QNED93A / QNED90A
Available screen sizes:
Complete the survey to find out the result
Panel type: LCD VA Refresh rate: 144Hz Brand: LG Resolution: 3840x2160 System: WebOS Model year: 2025
For years, we mainly associate LG with OLED TVs. And it's not hard to see why – after all, the company has its own organic panel factories, and they are indeed its hallmark. In the LCD segment, especially in more advanced Mini-LED backlit designs, LG has never taken centre stage. However, the model LG QNED93A marks a departure from this rule. The manufacturer is trying to prove that it can also create a solid LCD TV with full local dimming. Did this attempt succeed? We’re checking it out in practice.
7.3
Overall rating
LG QNED93A is a television that at first glance appears to be a solid step forward compared to previous LCD models from this brand. On paper, we get a lot: significantly more dimming zones, 144 Hz refresh rate for gamers, support for all HDR formats, including Dolby Vision, and WebOS with a new Magic remote, which remains one of the most user-friendly control systems. The QNED93A shines most brightly in gaming applications. Four fully-fledged HDMI 2.1 ports allow you to connect consoles and computers without any limitations, and the low input lag is maintained at both 120 and 60 Hz. For PC gamers, an additional advantage will be the 144 Hz mode and full compatibility with G-Sync and FreeSync. So it can confidently be said that in terms of features for gamers, the QNED93A doesn't have any complexes compared to the competition. Another strong point is WebOS. LG's system has been regarded for years as one of the most user-friendly in everyday use, and this is confirmed here. Everything is clear, and the Magic remote allows you to operate the TV like a mouse pointer – quickly and intuitively. Brightness is also a plus. At its peak, it managed to achieve results close to 1400 nits. This is enough for the image to not wash out in brighter rooms and for special effects in movies or games to look convincing. The image processor handles upscaling older content well – television or films in lower resolutions appear clearer and sharper than on many competing screens.
However, it cannot be hidden that the biggest problem with the QNED93A is the local dimming algorithms. In scenes full of blacks, the screen can darken significantly, causing many details to simply vanish. The effect is such that the contrast looks better at first glance, but at the cost of information that should be visible. An additional problem is the Dolby Vision mode, which usually improves certain aspects of screens, but in this case changes very little. The differences between dynamic and static metadata have to be literally searched for with a magnifying glass. This is simply disappointing because the hardware's number of dimming zones and stronger backlighting provide the basis for a better effect. So who is the LG QNED93A for? It is a television that will work excellently as a home entertainment centre, especially if you’re thinking about gaming on consoles or PCs. In everyday watching of TV and films in well-lit conditions, it will also provide a lot of satisfaction thanks to its high brightness and decent image processor. However, one must accept that in scenes with a lot of black and full utilization of HDR, this model does not measure up to its competitors. LG has shown that it can create a very solid LCD screen, but it is also evident that not everything has been refined as it has in their OLED televisions.
Pretty good contrast
High number of dimming zones
Good HDR brightness (around 1400 nits)
Wide colour gamut coverage (around 96% DCI-P3)
144 Hz mode and a full set of features for gamers (HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, G-Sync, FreeSync, HGiG, Game Bar)
Low input lag (7 ms at 120 Hz)
Good compatibility with PC, including 144 Hz and clear fonts
WebOS with a rich selection of apps and voice control
Magic remote
Quite effective upscaling and image processing tools - works great for older content like free-to-air TV or YouTube
Local dimming algorithms need refinement
Very average viewing angles
Dolby Vision does not bring a noticeable improvement over HDR10
Movies and series in UHD quality
6.8
Classic TV, YouTube
6.9
Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)
6.9
Gaming on console
8.6
TV as a computer monitor
8.6
Watching in bright light
6.2
Utility functions
8.2
Apps
9.1
Sound quality
6.9
Complete the survey to find out what fits your preferences
HDMI inputs: 0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps) Outputs: Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI) Network Interfaces: Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality: BuildQuality-Good
Stand type: Central
Bezel colour: Graphite
Stand: Fixed
Flat design: No
Accessories: Stand
LG QNED93A is a television that clearly shows the manufacturer has put effort into the quality of the build. The bezels are slender, particularly at the top, where the screen looks truly elegant and modern. The situation is a bit different at the bottom – there, LG has opted for a wide aluminium-graphite strip, which distinctly contrasts with the rest and gives the device character. In the package, we find a central stand, simple and sturdy, but without any adjustment options. We can’t rotate the screen or change its height, so you have to come to terms with how it has been designed. From the front, the QNED93A looks very tidy, but when we look at the back, the charm fades a bit. The casing is noticeably thicker than in more streamlined constructions, so there’s no way to flush mount the television flat against the wall. This doesn’t change the fact that the whole thing looks solid and absolutely does not give the impression of a cheap build.
Select size:
7.3/10
Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 308 (14 x 22)
Result
130,500:1
Result
30,950:1
Result
15,250:1
Result
6,750:1
Result
4,600:1
Visibility of details in the lights:
We took a close look at the 55-inch version of the LG QNED93A, featuring a high-contrast VA panel. However, for Mini-LED TVs, it’s not just the panel itself but primarily the number and performance of the local dimming zones that determine the final effect. In this model, we counted an impressive 308 zones right off the bat. In comparison, last year’s QNED91T in the 65-inch variant had only about 160. The difference is huge and shows that LG has made a significant step forward in this technology. On paper, it looks great, but in practice, enthusiasm quickly cools. The contrast in the QNED93A can indeed be impressive – bright elements are clearly separated from the blacks, and in many scenes, the depth effect is a real delight for the eyes. The problem is that despite such a significant improvement in the backlighting design, the results aren’t much better than last year’s model. The algorithms controlling the dimming can be overly aggressive. This is especially evident in darker sequences, where the screen dims to the point that subtle details vanish from view. Many viewers will appreciate the stronger blacks, but it’s hard to ignore that this comes at the expense of the director's intentions. The most problematic scenes turn out to be those with many small, bright elements. It is precisely then that the typical halo effects, or luminous halos, associated with LCDs and local zone dimming appear around them. While this phenomenon doesn’t completely ruin the experience, it serves as a reminder that even with an increased number of zones, local dimming still has its limitations. Ultimately, the contrast in the QNED93A can be considered good, but we feel that the manufacturer didn’t put in enough effort in optimising the new model in terms of blacks and contrast.
5.8/10
Supported formats: HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG Color gamut coverage: DCI P3: 95.1%, Bt.2020: 77.1%
Luminance measurements in HDR:
Result
1330 nit
Result
219 nit
Result
678 nit
Result
160 nit
Result
1016 nit
Although the number of local dimming zones in the LG QNED93A hasn’t directly translated to noticeably better contrast, it’s hard to deny this model one thing – it’s brighter than its predecessor. In synthetic tests, we recorded values around 1400-1500 nits, and more importantly, these results are reflected in real film scenes. In full-screen sequences flooded with whites or bright lights, the screen was able to maintain high luminance, providing a truly decent amazing HDR effect. Unfortunately, where the TV could show true class, that is in scenes requiring precision, all the magic dissipates. The dimming algorithms we mentioned earlier operate aggressively enough that small, bright objects – like distant lights, stars, or the moon – can almost completely disappear. Just look at the test scenes from the film Pan or Sicario 2 (screens 2 and 4) to see how subtle details are dimmed to the limits of their visibility. It’s a pity because a greater number of zones could theoretically translate to significantly better performance. Fortunately, there are also strong points. The QNED93A performs well in terms of colour gamut coverage, achieving around 96% of the DCI-P3 standard. As a result, colours in films look rich and full, and the image doesn’t lose intensity even in more demanding scenes. So, it can be said that the HDR in this model is solid, although the underdeveloped local dimming algorithms hinder its full potential.
Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)
Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)
When it comes to movie viewing experiences, the scenes heavily set in black on the QNED93A are unlikely to impress. However, when we reach for productions filled with special effects, the screen can really surprise positively – regardless of whether we're talking about the most demanding films mastered for studio monitors or everyday series and cinematic hits available on streaming platforms. The scene from the film Mr., as you can see, has been rendered very accurately – the brightest point in the form of a sunrise did not spill into a uniform, overexposed blot. The fireworks in Billy Lynn’s Long Halftime Walk also performed well, though here some flattening of colours is noticeable and there's a risk that the tiniest details may disappear in the darker parts of the image. Nevertheless, this does not change the fact that in everyday viewing, the QNED93A should satisfy you, and the overall reception of content will be more than satisfactory.
HDR luminance chart:
HDR luminance
QNED93A supports a wide range of HDR formats, but in practice, the two most important are static HDR10 and dynamic Dolby Vision. And here comes the surprise. Usually, in televisions that struggle with details in whites, Dolby Vision acts like a lifeline – rescuing the image from distress and showing what HDR10 cannot. However, in the case of QNED93A, the differences between both standards are so subtle that you would almost need a magnifying glass to notice them. Indeed, sometimes in Dolby Vision, you can see a bit more detail, but this effect is so marginal that one might get the impression that something clearly has not worked as it should.
Static HDR10
Dynamic: Dolby Vision
6/10
In film mode (more specifically Filmmaker), the colour reproduction in the QNED93A was relatively accurate, although there were some reservations. In SDR content, the white balance leaned towards warmer tones, resulting in a slight yellowing across the entire screen. Gamma, on the other hand, led to a slight lightening of the image, making it look a bit less natural, especially in scenes that required precise shading (this is evident in the comparison photo). This isn't a problem that immediately stands out to every viewer, but more discerning individuals may feel that the image deviates from the intended aesthetic of the filmmakers. In HDR materials, the situation looked a bit different. The white balance here was quite good, ensuring that whites did not take on pink or unwanted green hues. However, the brightness management turned out to be an issue. An analysis of the EOTF curve revealed that at certain moments, the television could be distinctly too dark where it shouldn't be, losing some details and lowering the realism of scenes. This detracted from the HDR effects, which were theoretically meant to be the most impressive. For this reason, we decided to conduct a calibration.
7.8/10
After professional calibration, the Filmmaker mode in the QNED93A has improved primarily where it matters most in everyday use. We managed to straighten the white balance and eliminate the yellowish tint in SDR content, which is what we watch most often – television, streaming services, or standard quality movies. As a result, the colours look natural and pleasant, making the overall viewing experience significantly more comfortable. In HDR mode, we also made corrections, but here the biggest issue turned out to be the EOTF curve. Although LG provides some leeway in the settings, the television still controls brightness on its own terms. It's clear that the local dimming algorithms are not fully refined and can ruin the viewing experience by dimming parts of the picture at inappropriate moments. Nevertheless, it’s worth opting for calibration of this model, especially the mode intended for everyday viewing.
8/10
The smoothness of tonal transitions in the LG QNED93A is really impressive. In most scenes, there are no visible artificial colour banding or posterisation effects. Dark scenes, in particular, are surprisingly good – many TVs struggle in these, but here the image remains smooth and consistent. In brighter sections, one can notice some slight colour blending, but it’s not pronounced enough to be distracting. However, during testing, we encountered a noticeable DSE effect, known as “dirty screen.” On our unit, this effect was strong enough that in bright scenes, the corners noticeably darkened, giving the impression of vignetting. This may be a defect of the test unit, but during intensive viewing, it was hard for us to overlook.
7.8/10
Smooth transition function
Image without overscan on the SD signal
The LG QNED93A turns out to be a very solid television for everyday use. Its image processor performs excellently with upscaling, making even older films or free-to-air television sharper and more detailed. During the screening of 'The Godfather,' it’s clearly visible how upscaling brings out additional details from the image – the characters’ faces and the texture of their clothing look significantly clearer than in the original material.
The digital image processing also deserves praise. The television is equipped with a function that reduces unwanted colour banding and screen irregularities. It works best in the 'Medium' setting – subtly smoothing tonal transitions without overly interfering with the image. This way, the natural film grain is preserved, and the screen does not appear artificially smooth. Perhaps in some scenes, slight colour banding can still be noticed, but in practice, the effect is more advantageous than with a stronger intervention from the algorithm.
7.9/10
Maximum refresh rate of the panel: 144Hz
Film motion smoothing option: Yes
Blur reduction option: Yes
BFI function 60Hz: Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
Brightness drop with BFI: 56%
LG QNED93A has been equipped with a 144 Hz panel. This is primarily a nod to gamers, but the fact that higher refresh rates are increasingly appearing in televisions can be viewed positively. In everyday viewing, 120 Hz remains key, and in this regard, the QNED93A performs well. The manufacturer also provides the option to adjust the picture thanks to the TruMotion system – the De-Judder and De-Blur sliders allow you to choose between a cinematic motion feel with visible frames and full smoothing with theatrical motion.
Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):
Blur (BFI function enabled):
Image flickers in this mode
Smużenie (4K@144Hz):
Smearing, as on a VA LCD panel, is at a low level. In fast scenes, whether it's sports or games, objects maintain sharp outlines, and the blur effect only appears on dark backgrounds. However, this does not significantly affect viewing comfort, as in most materials the image remains clear.
9.8/10
LG QNED93A is a television that has undoubtedly been designed with gamers in mind. Right from the start, we get a complete package – all four HDMI ports operate in 2.1 standard, so whether we connect a console, a PC, or a receiver, we have full compatibility. This is important because many manufacturers still limit themselves to two ports, and here nothing stands in the way of having maximum capabilities for all the equipment. There’s also an automatic game mode (ALLM), which automatically switches the television to the appropriate settings when the console is turned on, as well as variable refresh rate (VRR). This means the image doesn’t stutter or glitch, even when the frame rate drops – whether in dynamic shooters or during races.
The 144 Hz panel gives an additional advantage in computer games. While 120 Hz is enough for consoles, the QNED93A allows PCs to push even more – every movement, every glance to the side is refreshed faster, which makes a difference especially in e-sports. The manufacturer also considered HDR in games – the television supports HGiG mode, which are guidelines intended to ensure that the lighting effects are exactly as the game developers intended. To top it off, we get Game Bar – a special information bar called up on the screen that shows parameters in real time. You can check the frame rate, active VRR functions, or input lag levels. This solution is useful not only for settings enthusiasts but for anyone who wants to quickly check what mode the television is operating in and whether everything is working as it should.
9.8/10
In the delay field, the LG QNED93A has nothing to be ashamed of. The television responds instantly to our actions, which is evident from the first tests with the controller in hand. In 120 Hz mode, the input lag drops to around 7 ms, meaning almost immediate reaction – shots, passes, or precise movements of the stick are instantly reflected on the screen. For 60 Hz content, the result slightly increases to just under 15 ms, but it still remains within the full comfort zone. An interesting feature is the Dolby Vision mode for gaming, which on the QNED93A works with the Xbox Series X console. Here, the lag increases to about 20 ms. In theory, this could be considered a deterioration, but in practice, it's still a very good result. Even with such a demanding picture standard, gameplay remains dynamic, and the differences in control are practically imperceptible.
SDR | HDR | Dolby Vision |
---|---|---|
1080p60: 16 ms | 2160p60: 15 ms | 2160p60 DV: 21 ms |
1080p120: 7 ms | 2160p120: 7 ms | 2160p120 DV: 7 ms |
2160p60: 16 ms | ||
2160p120: 7 ms |
8.6/10
Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate): Yes
Font clarity: Good
Readability of dark text and shapes: Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate): 7ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement: BGR
Max refresh rate: 144Hz
G-Sync: Yes
A new feature in this year's model is full support for 144 Hz refresh rates, which PC gamers will appreciate. The QNED93A works with both Nvidia graphics cards, offering compatibility with G-Sync, and AMD products, where it operates with FreeSync Premium Pro. Thanks to this, gameplay is smooth, without screen tearing or stuttering, and the panel performs very well in dynamic e-sports titles and demanding AAA games.
Equally important is the clarity of the image for everyday work. The TV supports chroma 4:4:4, so fonts in Windows and apps are sharp and clear. However, we noticed a minor detail – with a dark background and bright letters, subtle horizontal stripes may appear due to the arrangement of subpixels. This is a minor detail that does not affect the comfort of using the TV on a daily basis, but perfectionists may notice it after prolonged text interaction. However, we don’t think anyone would want to work on a 55-inch screen from less than 1 metre away 😉.
2.9/10
Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees: 78%
QNED93A uses a VA panel, and that means one thing: the category of viewing angles becomes its Achilles' heel. Already at a tilt of around 45 degrees, brightness drops by up to 80%, and colours start to noticeably fade. This is the natural price for the high contrast offered by VA panels. There is no additional coating to improve angles, as is found in some more expensive models, so the QNED93A looks best when viewed head-on. If you’re planning a large family viewing, where some viewers will sit further to the side, you need to be aware that the image won't be as attractive as it is in the centre of the screen.
6.2/10
Matrix coating: Satin
Reflection suppression: Decent
Black levels during daytime: Good
LG QNED93A uses a satin matrix, which moderately deals with reflection suppression. It is definitely not at the level of matte screens, but it does not have the feeling of a mirrored surface like models with a glossy finish. This means that reflections are not as distracting, and the colours maintain their intensity even when light from the window hits the screen. The brightness is also a plus. The average level in HDR mode hovers around 550–600 nits. This means that the TV performs well in well-lit rooms, and you can enjoy viewing even when watching movies during the day, with only partially closed blinds. As a large screen in the living room, the QNED93A performs really well.
Matrix brightness
Average luminance SDR
LG QNED93A / QNED90A: 546 cd/m2
8.2/10
System: WebOS
System performance: Decent
QNED93A runs on webOS, one of the most enjoyable Smart TV systems. It comes equipped with AirPlay, Screen Mirroring, Chromecast, and convenient voice control. The platform is fairly intuitive and generally quick, though in the tested unit, there were moments when the response to the remote's touch required a moment of "thought". However, it’s hard to classify this as a serious issue – webOS remains a refined system and will likely receive further updates that will enhance it.
In this model, LG didn't include the old Magic remote with a numeric keypad, but the TV performs excellently as a screen for daily viewing of antenna channels. The EPG interface is clear, the TV offers a TV guide, and we have the option to record programs from the built-in tuners directly to a USB drive. Everything works correctly and intuitively. We just missed the PiP functionality, which is offered by only two manufacturers in 2025.
The Magic Remote is still the biggest difference compared to the competition. In 2025, it underwent a slight redesign – it has fewer buttons and resembles some of the minimalist remotes from Samsung. However, the cursor remains key, functioning like a magic wand. Just move your hand, and the pointer on the screen follows your movement. It’s incredibly simple yet very convenient. Navigation in the menu or entering passwords is significantly quicker, and it’s hard to switch back to traditional buttons afterwards.
9.1/10
8.8/10
Maximum photo resolution: | Supported photo formats: |
---|---|
The built-in media player in the LG QNED93A handles most popular video and audio formats with ease, so it’s more than sufficient for basic use. However, during testing, we noticed two minor hiccups. The first is the lack of support for HEIC files, which are Apple’s photo format. The manufacturer claims that the TV should open them, but we couldn't confirm this in practice. The second issue concerned text files with subtitles in TXT format. Fortunately, other more common subtitle formats worked without any problems, so it’s hard to consider this a significant limitation in everyday use.
6.9/10
81dB
Maximum volume
Supported codecs
(TV speakers)
Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
Dolby True HD 7.1
Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
DTS-HD Master Audio
LG QNED93A sounds quite pleasant for built-in speakers in a television. The sound is fairly clear, and at moderate volume levels, vocals and dialogue come through distinctly. The bass, as is often the case in relatively slim designs, isn't the strongest, but its presence is noticeable and is more than sufficient for daily TV show watching. The maximum volume reaches around 81 dB and doesn't lead to significant distortions, although during more demanding cinematic scenes, it's evident that the system has its limitations. Overall, the sound can be described as adequate and not off-putting. It definitely won't compete with a soundbar, but it won't ruin your movie experience either.
81dBC (Max)
75dBC
Software version during testing: 33.20.74
Subpixel Structure:
Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:
Backlight Type: Mini-LED QLED
Founder and originator of the "ChooseTV" portal
Journalist, reviewer, and columnist for the "ChooseTV" portal
Shopping Reviews
The best LG TVs 2024 / 2025! Which LG TV to choose? Ranking ... 5/9/2025
6/20/2025