PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) vs LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED)

Direct comparison

The One 2025 / PUS9060 / PUS9010 / PUS9000

Info

C6 / C64 / C6E / C6H / C61

Info

Available screen sizes: 75”

Available screen sizes: 77”83”

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.5

8.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.9

    8.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.6

    8.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.7

    8.6

  • Gaming on console

    8.1

    9.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.9

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    5.4

    7.6

  • Utility functions

    6.1

    8.4

  • Apps

    6.7

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    6.6

    7.0

Advantages

  • Very good viewing angles thanks to the IPS panel

  • Great compatibility with PC, 144 Hz mode, proper support for G-Sync and FreeSync

  • A wide range of features for gamers, variable refresh rate, auto game mode, HGiG

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including HDR10+ and Dolby Vision

  • Support for Dolby Atmos

  • Low input lag

  • Effective P5 image processor for lower quality materials

  • Ambilight system

  • Illuminated remote control

  • Remarkable brightness: over 2,000 nits in HDR

  • Perfect blacks and OLED contrast

  • Excellent picture quality in HDR films, including Dolby Vision

  • Very good image processing and upscaling

  • 165 Hz panel and virtually zero motion blur

  • Great package for gamers: VRR, G-Sync, HGiG, Dolby Vision Gaming

  • Very low input lag, about 5 ms at 120 Hz

  • Wider colour gamut than other WOLED screens: 99% DCI-P3 and about 83% BT.2020

  • Intuitive and modern webOS system

  • Convenient control with the Magic remote featuring a gyroscope

Disadvantages

No like
  • Poor black levels and contrast (typical for IPS panels)

  • Significantly lower brightness compared to the VA panel variant

  • Visible backlight bleed at the edges of the screen in the tested unit

  • Limited number of applications in the Titan OS system

  • The remote control is still based on infrared, requiring aiming at the screen

  • Strong dithering and flickering in near-black areas

  • Different versions of the remote depending on the C6 variant, so it's hard to be certain which Magic Remote will be included before purchase

  • Average reflection suppression, so in a very bright living room strong reflections may be visible

  • No DTS:X support; that format will require an external AV receiver or player

Our verdict

Philips PUS9010 (The One 2025) in the 75-inch version with an IPS panel is a television that clearly demonstrates the differences resulting from the panel used. Compared to the variant with a VA panel, it offers significantly better viewing angles, very good compatibility with consoles, and excellent text readability, but at the same time, it loses on black levels and maximum brightness. This model is best suited for everyday use, gaming, and in larger living rooms where not everyone is sitting perfectly facing the screen. The television performs very well in terms of responsiveness and features for gamers, offering 144 Hz, low input lag, and full support for variable refresh rate. An additional advantage is Ambilight, which, especially in the evening, can enhance the viewing experience and partially mask the weaker black levels of the IPS panel. After calibration, the picture appears coherent and natural, and the differences compared to the VA version in colour reproduction become difficult to detect. On the other hand, it must be clearly stated that those inclined towards cinematic viewing in complete darkness may be disappointed. The poor black levels, boosted brightness resulting from the quality of our unit, meant that this variant of the PUS9060 performs worse than the same model with a VA panel. Philips PUS9010 IPS is generally a sensible choice for users looking for a large, modern television for gaming, PC use, and everyday viewing, with very good viewing angles. However, if the priority is deep blacks and better picture quality, it is worth considering other variants or a higher class of equipment, as often for a small additional payment, you can get a television equipped with mini-LED technology.

The C6H is an even more interesting TV, because the use of a Tandem OLED panel means the C series is starting to move into territory previously reserved for much more expensive models. You still get all the advantages of the regular C6, but the panel’s capabilities are on a completely different level. HDR shows this best. In many scenes we measured around 2,000 nits, and at times even 2,300 nits, results until now seen in flagship TV ranges. There’s also a wider BT.2020 colour gamut and, above all, much stronger colours at high brightness. In that respect it’s hard to call this a typical mid-range OLED. What’s more, the rest of the TV keeps up with the panel. You get excellent image processing, 165 Hz, a full suite of gaming features and the user-friendly webOS with the Magic Remote. If we judged the C6H solely on its capabilities and specifications, it could easily be placed alongside much more expensive top-tier TVs. Unfortunately the spell is somewhat broken when evening comes and you want to watch a film. Around black our C6H sample showed noticeable dithering and an irritating flicker. It was most visible in difficult, very dark scenes, and it’s the kind of flaw that’s hard to ignore in an OLED TV. After all, part of the reason you buy such a panel is to enjoy perfect blacks during an evening viewing. It’s all the more a shame because otherwise the C6H is a truly excellent TV. Everything also indicates this isn’t a limitation of the panel itself but a software problem, similar to what we observed in the LG G6. We therefore hope LG will fix it with an update, as it has done in some overseas markets. For now this one issue prevents us from fully recommending the C6H. Until LG fixes it, the safer choice is the regular C6 or a competing OLED that doesn’t struggle with this near-black behaviour. However, if an update does indeed resolve the problem, the C6 with Tandem technology would immediately become one of the most interesting OLEDs of 2026.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Toslink (Optical audio)
IR (remote)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 1Gbit
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Premium
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Silver
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

2.9/10

10/10

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,300:1

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,400:1

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,450:1

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,500:1

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,350:1

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

In the 75-inch version of the Philips PUS9010 that we tested, an IPS panel has been used, which is immediately noticeable in terms of black levels and contrast. Compared to the 55-inch variant with a VA panel that we tested earlier, the difference is evident from the first scenes. The black is shallower, and in a dark room, the screen clearly tends towards greys. The television is not equipped with local dimming, so in low light, dark scenes lack depth. In practice, the picture looks noticeably worse than in the smaller 55-inch variant, especially during film sessions viewed in the evening. The situation is somewhat salvaged by Ambilight. The rear lighting can gently "trick" the eye, improving perceived contrast and making the blacks seem a bit deeper. It's a simple trick, but it works. That's why this model is definitely better watched with Ambilight turned on. It doesn't have to be a multi-colour mode following the image. Even a uniform white backlight can enhance the perception of dark scenes.

The Tandem OLED panel gives the C6 noticeably greater capabilities in several areas of the picture, but when it comes to black levels there was nothing that needed changing. As with any OLED, individual pixels can be completely switched off, allowing the TV to deliver perfect black and virtually infinite contrast. It therefore makes no difference whether bright subtitles appear on a black background, tiny stars or small light sources. You won't see the glow typical of LCDs around them, and transitions between bright and dark areas are very precise. In terms of black level alone the Tandem OLED version has no advantage over the standard C6, because both panels can switch off pixels on a per-pixel basis. Differences between them only appear with brightness and colour. However, if we look solely at contrast and black level, both variants offer the same reference-level performance.

NOTE: In the helicopter scene from the film Sicario 2 we noticed grain and flickering in the darkest parts of the image. This looks like a software bug that LG should address with an update. On the Tandem OLED version the effect is even more noticeable, and we observed similar behaviour on the flagship LG G6.

HDR effect quality

5.2/10

8.8/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 90.6%, Bt.2020: 66.9%
DCI P3: 99.4%, Bt.2020: 93.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

374 nit

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

383 nit

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

397 nit

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

391 nit

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

401 nit

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

2133 nit

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1900 nit

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

2300 nit

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1964 nit

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1648 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED)

PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS)

Luminance of RGB colors

In the Philips PUS9010 version with an IPS panel, the HDR brightness unfortunately performs worse than in the previously tested 55-inch model with a VA panel. The difference reaches about 100 nits, which is quite noticeable given the relatively low values. While the VA version could exceed 500 nits, here the maximum brightness is around 400 nits. This level still allows for watching movies and series in HDR, especially on streaming platforms, but the effects are clearly muted. Bright elements do not have the same impact, and scenes requiring high luminance appear less impressive. On the positive side, the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour gamut is commendable. The IPS version offers around 91%, which is about 5% more than the variant with a VA panel. This translates to somewhat better colour saturation in HDR content, despite the lower brightness. Colours can appear more vibrant and cohesive, especially in colourful scenes.

And it is with HDR that the Tandem OLED panel shows its greatest advantage. The C6H’s brightness is simply very high and in our measurements it hovered around 1900–2300 nits in most film scenes. That’s already a level at which bright highlights, the sun or small light sources can look truly spectacular. The biggest impression, however, was made by the fifth scene from the film The Meg. It is exceptionally demanding for OLEDs because almost the entire screen is very bright. Even so, the C6H reached about 1650 nits in that scene. By comparison, the regular C6 with a classic WOLED panel recorded around 600–700 nits at the same point. So we’re talking about more than double the brightness, and in places the difference even approaches three times. And that is probably the best example of what Tandem OLED delivers here. It’s not just a higher result on a small test patch. The C6H can maintain very high brightness even when much more of the screen is lit. As a result HDR has significantly greater dynamism, and in this respect the C6H is much closer to flagship OLEDs than to typical mid-range models.

Colours

Tandem OLED also brings an improvement in colours. DCI-P3 coverage remains practically complete at about 99%, while in the much wider BT.2020 colour space we measured around 82–83%. That’s roughly seven percentage points more than the regular C6. In everyday use this won’t be a difference visible in every scene, because most films do not use such a wide gamut. However, when very highly saturated colours appear, the C6H already has noticeably greater capability, especially in reds. Reds benefit the most, becoming deeper and more saturated. This still isn’t at the level of the best QD-OLED panels or SQD TVs, but for a WOLED panel the performance is really very good.

Factory color reproduction

5.9/10

7.8/10

We assessed the colour reproduction, as always, on the factory settings, focusing on the movie mode, which for Philips usually provides the best starting point. This is also a good moment to demonstrate how much the same TV model can vary depending on the type of panel used. Looking at the white balance, the overall tendency remains similar to the variant with the VA panel. Excessive red in the whites is still noticeable, but in the tested unit with an IPS panel, there are also deficits in the blue channel. As a result, the image has a slightly different colour character, which can be clearly seen in the comparative materials. This is a very good example illustrating why ready-made settings downloaded from the internet do not always work even within the same model.

However, returning to the assessment itself, this unit performs quite well, especially with SDR content. Colour tests show correct saturation and consistency, with no glaring errors that could interfere with everyday viewing. In HDR materials, slight deficits in reds can already be noticed, but these are not flaws that spoil the overall perception of the image. The biggest limitations do not come directly from the colours, but rather from the white and black levels. The use of an IPS panel and slightly lowered gamma results in the image being slightly boosted in brightness, and the poor black levels further affect the perceived contrast. This makes the overall picture look brighter, but at the same time it loses depth, especially during evening viewing.

Straight out of the box the LG C6 is fairly well set up, especially if you select the Filmmaker mode. In SDR content the white balance is decent, although as brightness increases it shows a slight deficiency in red. The image therefore becomes a little cooler, but not enough for the difference to be very noticeable during normal viewing. More is happening in the brightness response. Gamma is a bit low and, instead of holding at 2.4, it sits closer to 2.1–2.2 across much of the range. In practice the C6 slightly brightens midtones. Shadow detail is therefore more readable, but the picture loses some depth compared with how it should look in a darkened room.

In HDR the situation is a bit more interesting. The lower end of the greyscale performs very well, but from roughly 20–30% brightness the white balance starts to drift increasingly. As brightness rises there is more red, while blue becomes noticeably deficient. In the brightest scenes the difference is already substantial and also affects the reproduction of some colours. The EOTF itself is, however, fairly well tracked across most of the range. The C6 merely tends to slightly brighten the image, which we already saw in our film comparisons. The largest deviation appears in the very brightest areas, where the TV begins to adapt the signal to the panel’s capabilities.

The factory Filmmaker setting in HDR is therefore not perfect, but overall it performs well. The biggest room for improvement is the white balance, particularly at high brightness.

Color reproduction after calibration

8/10

9.1/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, the picture was brought to a truly sensible level. The overall look is coherent and natural, and when it comes to colour reproduction, it is difficult to unequivocally state whether we are dealing with a VA or IPS panel. This is a good sign, showing that the television has a solid foundation for further adjustments. It is worth noting the larger colour gamut coverage in this variant, which can subtly enhance the perception of colourful scenes, particularly in HDR content. However, this advantage is largely balanced out by the boosted black levels resulting from the use of an IPS panel. The limited black depth affects the perceived contrast, especially when watching in a dark room. Consequently, despite the noticeable improvement after calibration, the final assessment remains the same as in the variant with the VA panel. Better colours are unable to fully compensate for the weaker black levels.

LG TVs have long been very receptive to calibration and the C6 is no exception. After adjustment the white balance could be set almost perfectly, and most colour errors fell below 3, often even down to around 2. In practice this means very accurate colour reproduction in both SDR and HDR. An interesting detail only emerged when we looked at the HDR luminance response. On a classic EOTF plot everything looks almost ideal and at first glance it would be hard to find fault. Only when we measured the TV's behaviour on filters based on real film scenes did it become apparent that the C6 has a slight tendency to artificially boost image brightness.

It is not a huge difference and many people may even welcome it because HDR looks a bit more striking as a result. From the point of view of fidelity to the source material this is not ideal behaviour though – some scenes are simply a touch brighter than the filmmaker intended. Interestingly, this is rather unusual for LG. In previous generations the brand's TVs typically stuck closely to the reference picture characteristic after calibration. With the C6 we are still very close to the standard, but this subtle brightness 'boost' can indeed be noticed in films and series.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.5/10

5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

When it comes to the fluidity of tonal transitions, in the 75-inch version with an IPS panel, we have mixed feelings. Looking solely at the colourful gradients, the transitions perform even better than in the variant with a VA panel. The colours blend more smoothly, and typical banding issues are less noticeable. However, the situation changes dramatically in dark scenes. The tragic black characteristic of IPS effectively ruins the perception of tonal transitions in the low brightness areas. The boosted black makes it difficult to notice subtle shades of colours, and the very unnatural backlight bleed further exacerbates the situation. In the tested specimen, the backlight bleed was particularly noticeable at the edges, where the light almost pierced through to the screen. This not only negatively impacts the perception of dark scenes but also significantly hampers a reliable assessment of the gradation itself.

In terms of tonal transitions alone, the C6H performs really well. Gradients are smooth, colours do not break up into obvious bands, and in both bright and dark scenes it is hard to find significant posterisation issues. In most material the image looks very clean in this respect.

Note: The issue of dithering in near-black areas looks much worse, however. In very dark parts of the image you can notice distinct flickering and grain, which can be quite pronounced when viewed up close. The Tandem OLED panel version exhibits the effect noticeably more than the regular C6. It's a shame, because the tonal transitions themselves are at a very high level. It is precisely the behaviour of the image just above black that is the main reason we cannot rate this category higher.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.7/10

8.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

In the Philips PUS9010, we find another iteration of the P5 Perfect Picture image processor, designed to improve the quality of inferior materials. One of the components of this system is the distortion reduction function, which is responsible for smoothing tonal transitions. It works effectively and indeed reduces the visible colour gradation. Unfortunately, it does so quite aggressively. In practice, it can dim details such as the texture of materials or film grain. This is a notable compromise, so we would not recommend it for movie screenings. However, it performs significantly better with more casual content like YouTube or regular television. The P5 processor also manages quite well with lower resolution materials. The image is soft, at times even too soft, but this can easily be corrected with the sharpness slider, adjusting the effect to personal preference. A positive aspect is also the lack of edge trimming in SD materials, which is still not standard in this class of televisions.

Here the LG C6 has taken a really big step forward. The TV uses the same processor found in the flagship G6, and in terms of image processing the two models are very similar. That's a considerable plus, because this year's LG processor excels in that area. The "Smooth Gradation" function works particularly well. With heavily compressed footage it can effectively hide ugly banding and artefacts that often occur, for instance in lower-quality streaming. It's best to leave it on the "Low" setting. Then the improvement is noticeable, while the TV does not yet start to blur fine detail. Higher levels smooth the picture more, but can already remove some of the natural texture of objects on screen. Upscaling itself also performs very well. Lower-resolution material is sharpened correctly, edges look clean, and the processor quite effectively reconstructs fine detail. In this respect the C6 is already very close to LG's best TVs and the differences compared with the G6 are small.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.7/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
165Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
48%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur (4K@165Hz):

Philips PUS9010 has a 4K panel with a refresh rate of 144 Hz, which will be appreciated primarily by sports fans and gamers. This is especially evident in dynamic scenes where the motion is sharp, and annoying blur is almost non-existent. When it comes to movies (standard 24 fps), Philips gives us a proven set of settings known from higher series. Two sliders are used to control motion. “Smoothness” allows you to adjust the image to your own taste: at low settings, we maintain a cinematic character, while moving the slider to the right gives us a perfectly smooth, albeit somewhat “theatrical” effect. On the other hand, “Motion Blur Reduction” is a function designed for sports – it ensures that fast-moving objects do not lose detail and remain clear.

The C6H with a Tandem OLED panel can also operate at refresh rates of up to 165 Hz. PC gamers will naturally get the most out of this, because for consoles, films or sport we're still looking at a maximum of 120 Hz. The panel itself is excellent when it comes to motion. OLED pixels respond virtually instantly, so even with fast-moving objects you don't see the typical motion blur. The picture remains clean whether you're watching sport or playing fast-paced games.

If you prioritise smoothness over motion clarity, TruMotion is available. LG lets you adjust two parameters separately. De-Judder mainly works with films and series shot at 24 fps and helps reduce the judder that's characteristic of them. De-Blur, meanwhile, is intended for 50/60 fps content, so it's particularly useful when watching sport or television.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

10/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    40 - 165Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The Philips PUS9010 is a truly solid machine for gaming. It has everything that matters: VRR, automatic game mode (ALLM), and support for HGiG. The latter is a great feature – it allows HDR in games to be set exactly as the developers envisioned. The television handles 120 Hz refresh rates effortlessly at every popular resolution (1080p, 1440p, and 4K). Whether you connect a PS5, Xbox, or a powerful PC, everything functions stably and simply as it should. Gamers will also appreciate the Game Bar. This quick, clear menu immediately shows whether the low latency mode is active. This is especially useful when frequently switching between different consoles. The whole experience is complemented by Ambilight. Evening sessions with this backlighting take the atmosphere to a whole new level – the image seems larger, and dynamic scenes leave an even better impression. Even if someone isn’t a fan of such “gadgets”, it’s hard to deny that it’s impressive.

The C6H offers practically the full suite of gaming features. On consoles you can easily use 4K at 120 Hz, while PC users can push the refresh rate up to 165 Hz. The TV also supports VRR from 40 to 165 Hz, ALLM and a proper implementation of HGiG. Dolby Vision is also available in game mode, which remains a major advantage for Xbox owners. All key information can be viewed in the Game Bar, which provides quick access to VRR settings and the current signal’s parameters. The OLED implementation therefore does not alter the feature set available to gamers, but with such high panel brightness HDR games can make an even stronger impression. Functionally, the C6H is simply a very complete TV for console and PC gaming.

Input lag

9.5/10

9.9/10

SDR

1080p60
18 ms
14 ms
1080p120
8 ms
5 ms
2160p60
18 ms
14 ms
2160p120
8 ms
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
18 ms
14 ms
2160p120
8 ms
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
34 ms
22 ms
2160p120 DV
14 ms

In terms of responsiveness, the Philips PUS9010 performs very well. The input lag is around 9 ms at 120 Hz and 18 ms at 60 Hz, so the response to movement with the controller is quick and predictable. In practice, even dynamic action games or esports titles pose no problems. Dolby Vision in games performs less well. The lag then increases to around 35 ms, which will still be acceptable for less demanding players, but more sensitive individuals may start to feel a slight sluggishness in control. For this reason, HDR10 with HGiG enabled remains a better choice. In this model, it works correctly, providing lower latency and more predictable brightness behaviour, without the issues that can arise in Dolby Vision.

In terms of input lag the C6 performs as a good gaming TV should. At 120 Hz we measured around 5 ms, so the response to the controller is practically instantaneous. At 60 Hz the result rises to around 14 ms, but those are still good figures. Latency is slightly higher with Dolby Vision. At 120 Hz it's around 14 ms, and at 60 Hz about 22 ms. In practice, if you play normally on an Xbox, it's unlikely to be something that will actually bother you.

Compatibility with PC

8.9/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
9ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RGB
RWBG
Max refresh rate
144Hz
165Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

The Philips PUS9010 (2025) is a very good television for using with a PC. The manufacturer has provided a dedicated 144 Hz mode for PC gamers, and the television correctly supports variable refresh rates for both NVIDIA and AMD cards. The G-Sync and FreeSync features work seamlessly, making PC gaming smooth and free from screen tearing. Since we already know that the television is very suitable for gaming, it is worth noting the readability of text, especially when working daily on the PC. The use of an IPS panel is definitely a plus in this regard. The chroma has been implemented correctly, so we can talk about almost perfect font rendering. The text is sharp, clear and does not pose problems even with prolonged use. However, we must highlight a minor detail out of our meticulousness. With very dark text, vertical and horizontal lines can have slightly different brightness levels. This is, however, purely a technical flaw, practically imperceptible in practice, especially in the case of the 75-inch variant, where the distance from the screen additionally masks this effect.

The C6H with a Tandem OLED panel also works very well as a computer display. When working with text the most important thing is that the TV correctly handles 4:4:4 chroma subsampling, so small fonts, icons and interface elements are rendered clearly. The only thing you might notice from very close up is slight coloured fringes caused by the unusual subpixel layout. At a normal viewing distance for such a large screen that practically stops being an issue and everyday text is very legible. The C6H performs even better when the computer is used for gaming. The TV can run at refresh rates of up to 165 Hz, supports G-Sync and VRR, and input lag at the maximum refresh rate is about 5 ms. Combined with the very fast response time of the OLED panel this provides excellent conditions for PC gaming. There is no smearing, the image is very smooth and controls respond almost instantly. In that respect the C6H can easily be treated not only as a TV but also as a very large gaming monitor. You just need to remember that at 77 or 83 inches arranging a desk sensibly can be quite a challenge. 😉

Viewing angles

5.8/10

7.3/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
58%
30%

The viewing angles on the Philips PUS9010 are very good, and this is one of the greatest advantages of the IPS panel. Compared to the variant with a VA panel, the difference is noticeable. The picture retains significantly better consistency, and the colours remain stable even when viewed from a sharp angle. Of course, with a change in position, the level of brightness does drop slightly; however, the degradation of the image is much less than in the VA version. It is not at the level known from OLED screens, but among LCD televisions, one can say that it has some of the better viewing angles available on the market.

The C6H with a Tandem OLED panel also offers very wide viewing angles. You can watch the TV well off to the side and the image still retains high contrast and saturated colours. As you would expect from an OLED, it’s one of those screens where you don’t have to fight for the seat right in the middle of the sofa. Only TVs with QD-OLED panels from Samsung Display perform slightly better in this respect. The C6H’s marginally lower score comes from our unit having a slightly greater tendency to shift toward a greenish tint when viewed at really extreme angles. This is, however, a subtle difference that we noticed mainly during direct comparisons. In normal viewing, most people are unlikely to notice it.

Daytime performance

5.4/10

7.6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Glare
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED): 690 cd/m2

PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS): 398 cd/m2

In terms of use in a bright room, the Philips PUS9010 performs reasonably well. The applied satin matrix effectively dampens reflections and does not create a mirror effect, which means the screen doesn't scatter as much light from windows or lamps. Unfortunately, compared to the VA panel variant, the television performs worse. The screen is noticeably darker, which can be felt in a very sunny room. Under normal daytime conditions, this does not pose a major problem; however, in very bright surroundings, the difference compared to the VA version is noticeable.

The Tandem OLED panel performs noticeably better in daylight. The screen coating itself behaves very similarly: it is glossy, does a decent job of suppressing reflections and maintains deep blacks with the lights on. A bright window or lamp will still be visible on the screen, but the image does not lose much of its depth. The biggest difference, of course, is brightness. In typical SDR content the C6H reaches around 690 nits, noticeably more than the standard C6. In a bright living room you can really tell the difference; the image has more punch and cuts through the light entering the room much better. Tandem OLED also handles scenes with many bright elements better, although brightness still drops at near‑full white. So they have not entirely removed one of the typical OLED characteristics, but the limitation is far less pronounced here. If the TV is going to be used often in a bright living room, this is one of those C6H advantages over the regular C6 that you will actually notice in everyday use.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
WRGB TANDEM OLED
Software version during testing
TPN258E_V058.002.236.151
43.11.73
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS)

LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED)

TV features

6.1/10

8.4/10

  • System
    Titan OS
    WebOS
  • System performance
    Decent
    Very good
  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    IR (remote)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 1Gbit
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) TV features
Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) TV features
Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) TV features
Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) TV features
Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) TV features
Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) TV features
Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) TV features
Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    Yes
    No
  • Font size adjustment
    No
    No
  • Audio description
    No
    Yes

Classic TV Features

When it comes to classic features, the Philips PUS9010 is rather average. Onboard, we find the basics such as EPG, teletext, and the ability to connect headphones via Bluetooth. However, this is where the list of stronger points essentially ends. Unfortunately, it lacks USB recording and PiP (picture in picture) mode. These are features that are becoming increasingly rare but can still be useful in everyday use. A plus is the remote control with a numeric keypad. It is modern, backlit, and visually makes a very good impression. It's just a shame that it is still an infrared remote, so it requires aiming at the screen. With such a modern look, one would expect Bluetooth radio control.

Smart TV

Most Philips TVs from 2025, including the PUS9010, operate on the Titan OS system. This is still a relatively young platform, and unfortunately, its limitations are still apparent. The system itself runs quite smoothly, noticeably better than in the manufacturer's cheaper models, and during tests, it did not encounter issues when using screen mirroring or AirPlay, which is still not a given. However, the biggest drawback remains the limited number of available apps. This can be partially circumvented by connecting a keyboard and mouse to the TV and using the built-in web browser, but this is more of an emergency solution than a convenient everyday option.

Smart TV: webOS

Regardless of which C6 variant you get, the feature set remains the same. At the heart of the TV is webOS, the system LG has been developing for many years. It runs quickly, is well optimised and above all offers access to virtually all popular apps. Netflix, Disney+, Prime Video, YouTube, Max and other streaming services — in that respect it’s hard to find any major gaps. The system also provides a lot of additional options. You get AirPlay, easy screen casting from a smartphone, smart home device control and the ability to personalise the home screen. LG has expanded webOS significantly over several generations and at times the number of available tabs and recommendations can feel a bit overwhelming (especially with background ads), but once you get used to it the system is convenient and, above all, works smoothly.

Classic TV features

The C6 also handles being used as a regular TV very well, not just as a screen for Netflix. Terrestrial TV reception, the programme guide and channel switching all work smoothly and it’s hard to have major complaints. LG still offers the ability to record programmes to USB, so in terms of classic features the kit is really comprehensive. Basically, we’re missing only two things. The first is PiP, the ability to display two video sources simultaneously. The second is a backlight on the remote, which would be especially useful when watching in the evening. Apart from that, the C6 has pretty much everything you can expect from a modern television.

Magic Remote: DIFFERENT VERSIONS

When buying a C6 it’s worth paying attention to the remote, because LG has created a little confusion here. During our tests we had, among others, the C64 variant, found in large retail chains. The box contained the new, much smaller Magic Remote Slim. It has fewer buttons and looks decidedly more modern, but still retains the two most characteristic features of LG remotes: the scroll wheel and cursor control via motion. Meanwhile, the C6E we tested was equipped with the older, larger version of the Magic Remote. It works pretty much the same, but has a classic numeric keypad and many more physical buttons. It looks less modern, but some people, especially those used to traditional remotes, may find it more comfortable. So there’s no single answer as to which remote is better. The new one is smaller, simpler and definitely more contemporary. The older one, however, gives quicker access to a larger number of functions without having to click through menus. It’s worth knowing that depending on the C6 designation, the box may contain either variant.

Apps

6.7/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

7.9/10

9.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The media player in the new Philips is a solid standard. It handles most popular video and audio files, operating steadily and predictably. Although fans of rarer subtitle formats or specific image resolutions may feel somewhat unsatisfied, for the average user, the built-in software does the job. It's a convenient solution that means we don't need to engage external equipment to play materials from an external drive.

During our tests the TV easily handled virtually all the most popular video formats we put on a USB stick. There were no problems with high bitrates, subtitles or more demanding files, so it’s hard to fault it in that respect. The only exception was files with a DTS audio track. That’s no surprise, because the TV simply doesn’t support that codec. Otherwise the built-in player is good enough that most users won’t need to install external apps or connect an external player.

Sound

6.6/10

7/10

  • Maximum volume
    85dB
    88dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The sound from the Philips PUS9010 is simply adequate. The tested unit offers a 2.0 set with a total power of 40 W, which is more than sufficient for daily watching of television, films, or series. The sound quality is pleasant, but it is hard to speak of anything exceptional, especially if one is looking for strong bass or greater dynamics. One positive aspect is the wide range of audio formats supported. When connecting a soundbar or home cinema system, the television easily supports Dolby Atmos and DTS, without needing to fiddle with settings or sacrificing sound quality. For those planning on external audio systems, this is definitely good news.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

88dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy