U8000F / U8092F
Available screen sizes: 43”50”65”75”85”
Diagonal with a different matrix:
Complete the survey to find out the result
Panel type: LCD IPS Refresh rate: 60Hz Brand: SAMSUNG Resolution: 3840x2160 System: Tizen Model year: 2025
We have another installment of the Samsung U8000F TV test for you. Although the manufacturer uses one name for the entire series, individual variants can differ drastically from each other. In this material, we take a look at the version equipped with a VA panel. How does it compare to its "brother" with an IPS panel? Does better black levels compensate for certain compromises? We check this in practice.
5.7
Overall rating
Samsung U8000F with a VA panel is a television that can pleasantly surprise in its class – of course, if we know what to expect from it. Its biggest advantage is definitely the black quality. Compared to the version with an IPS panel, the difference is enormous – the picture gains depth, the contrast looks much better, and evening movie sessions no longer feel like watching content through a gray filter. For a budget segment device, this is truly a nice surprise. The proven Tizen system also deserves credit, which not only works smoothly but also offers access to a full range of applications, support for SmartThings, and a voice assistant (via an app). The PC mode and connection to a console work flawlessly – the fonts are clear and readable. Additionally, it has basic features for gamers, such as VRR and ALLM, which – although they won’t turn this TV into an e-sport machine – are more than sufficient for occasional gaming.
Of course, like any construction in this budget, the U8000F with a VA panel has its limitations. The viewing angles are not one of its strong points – watching the picture from the side easily reveals a drop in quality. Nevertheless, it's hard to consider this a serious drawback – because something has to give. Better black levels are always associated with slightly lesser flexibility in adjustment. When it comes to HDR, we have rather a symbolic approach – the brightness is too low to talk about a true “wow” effect, and the color palette is limited. But let’s face the facts – that’s not why you buy such a TV. So if you're planning to purchase the U8000F, we definitely recommend opting for the version with a VA panel. It's still a very basic model, but in this version, it offers more than one might expect – especially in terms of black quality. And in this price range, that’s quite a lot.
Nice black and contrast (VA panel version)
Advanced Smart system: Tizen
Great for working with text - displays fonts very well
Basic features for gamers - VRR and ALLM
Low input lag
Low brightness
Worse viewing angles compared to the IPS matrix version (Obvious, isn't it? 😉)
Infrared remote control
Worse appearance than its predecessor
Movies and series in UHD quality
5.7
Classic TV, YouTube
5.9
Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)
5.5
Gaming on console
6.5
TV as a computer monitor
6.0
Watching in bright light
3.8
Utility functions
5.5
Apps
8.7
Sound quality
5.7
Complete the survey to find out what fits your preferences
HDMI inputs: 3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1 Outputs: eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI) Network Interfaces: Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality: Average
Stand type: Legs
Kolor ramki: Black
If someone was hoping that the U8000F would be a direct stylistic successor to the DU8000 model, they may feel disappointed. The new version from 2025 has clearly gained "mass" and gives the impression of a step back in terms of design. From a modern and fairly slim construction, it has become a television with a more clunky appearance. On the plus side, the front – from this side, the television still looks decent. The thin, metal bezels a few millimeters thick make it look better from the front than many models from the lowest tier. Nonetheless, the entire casing reveals that we are dealing with a very basic construction. It's a shame, because over the past few years, the 8000 series has been regarded as one of the more aesthetic in its segment. The 2025 version is unlikely to convince those looking for an elegant television for their living room.
Select size:
5.3/10
Local dimming function: No
Result
4,600:1
Result
4,150:1
Result
3,900:1
Result
3,750:1
Result
3,400:1
Visibility of details in the lights:
It is worth noting that the test concerns the variants with a VA matrix, which perform significantly better in terms of black levels and contrast compared to the 55-inch version equipped with an IPS panel. Thanks to the higher native contrast (though it is not a top result among VA matrices), the tested scenes looked much better – without noticeable grayness or the typical washed-out shadow effect found in IPS matrices. The black levels in the U8092F model can be considered really good and satisfying, especially in this price range. Of course, this is not a design equipped with local dimming, so it is hard to expect spectacular results in very challenging scenes. On the other hand, we are talking about an exceptionally budget-friendly television that performs quite solidly within its range.
Halo effect and black detail visibility:
3.1/10
Supported formats: HDR10, HDR10+, HLG Color gamut coverage: DCI P3: 79.1%, Bt.2020: 58.5%
Luminance measurements in HDR:
Result
212 nit
Result
173 nit
Result
265 nit
Result
90 nit
Result
250 nit
While the U8000F with a VA panel can still be praised for decent blacks, there are no longer any reasons to be impressed regarding brightness – especially in HDR scenes. The television reaches a maximum of just under 250 nits, which is simply too little to talk about any impressive light effects. Bright elements come off as pale, and scenes that should shine look rather flat. An interesting situation was observed during the test of a scene from the movie Sicario 2 – the screen noticeably darkened, as if the television were trying to hide its limitations in displaying blacks. One might get the impression that the device artificially darkens the image to improve contrast, but in practice, the effect doesn't make much of a difference, other than that we see less on the screen. Additionally, there's the issue of colors – the U8000F does not support a wide color gamut, so don't expect vibrant, saturated shades known from better models. The HDR image here resembles slightly brightened SDR and… maybe that’s even a good thing. For this model, it's not worth setting expectations for cinematic experiences – it's better to treat HDR as a modest addition.
Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)
Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)
We checked how the U8092F performs not only in synthetic tests but, above all, during a real viewing – because let's face it, test patterns are tests, but it's movies that are watched most often. And we must admit: the television pleasantly surprised us. After the lab results, we didn't expect miracles, yet everyday use turned out to be quite enjoyable.
The colors are not among the most saturated, and there are moments when small inaccuracies appear – that's a fact. But despite this, watching movies was surprisingly good. The television tried to render the bright elements of the scenes – sometimes with better success, sometimes with worse. There were instances where the sun and clouds blended into one bright spot, but at other moments, the details were clearly visible. The setting of the HDR tone mapping function had a significant impact here – it is definitely worth keeping it on. The image then gains naturalness and recovers some details that in the default setting tended to get lost in overexposures. This was particularly noticeable in scenes from the movie The Meg, where the bright areas had noticeably more visible content.
HDR luminance chart:
Luminancja HDR
Luminance of RGB colors
The image quality in HDR10 and HDR10+ modes on the tested model U8092F leaves a lot to be desired. Even though the television supports dynamic metadata, the differences between the two versions are minimal – in HDR10+ you can indeed see a bit more detail (although this is not evident in our test photo), but the overall perception still falls short. This is disappointing, especially since HDR10+ as a format has great potential – by adapting parameters to each scene, it can significantly improve contrast and visibility of details, especially on screens with limited brightness. Its growing popularity – presence on platforms such as Prime Video, Netflix, and soon also Disney+ – is definitely good news for viewers. It's just a pity that in the case of U8092F, the implementation of this format does not allow it to fully utilize its capabilities.
Static HDR10
Dynamic: HDR10+
6.5/10
The Samsung U8000F has been tested by us in the best picture mode available out of the box – namely, Filmmaker Mode. This profile is supposed to provide a neutral, cinematic image, free of unnecessary enhancements and artificial beautifications. In the case of SDR content – mainly in HD or SD resolution – the television performed surprisingly well right out of the box. The only noticeable imperfection was brightness management. The gamma chart showed some deviations – slight brightening or dimming of certain tones – but in practice, it did not significantly affect the viewing experience. For a television in this segment, it performs quite well.
However, the situation is considerably weaker in HDR mode. Although white balance was still acceptable, color errors were very pronounced. In the Color Checker test, almost every sample was outside the target point, and the image itself looked unnatural – colors were shifted, sometimes too cool, at other times simply dull and lifeless. The main problem lies in the hardware limitations – the U8000F does not support the wide color gamut of DCI-P3, so it is physically unable to reproduce the colors anticipated by the HDR standard. And unfortunately, this is evident in almost every more demanding scene.
7.5/10
Right out of the box, the U8000F offered quite a decent picture in SDR for its price range. However, we managed to slightly enhance it – we reduced a subtle purple tint and improved the gamma characteristics, giving it a more natural curve. Despite these adjustments, the TV still tends to brighten the brightest details a bit too aggressively – the gamma graph shows a clear dip that cannot be fully corrected.
On the other hand, in HDR mode, it is noticeably weaker. It's hard to talk about any significant improvement here – despite attempts to tweak the settings, the picture still presents considerable color errors. A Delta E exceeding 7 means noticeable deviations that couldn't be effectively reduced. Unfortunately, this is a limitation of the design itself – the U8000F was simply not designed for serious HDR. In everyday SDR viewing, it performs quite well, but when it comes to HDR content... it's best not to have too high expectations.
9.5/10
One of the key elements influencing the perception of the image is the way the television handles tonal transitions – that is, the blending of colors and shades without clear boundaries. In the case of the Samsung U8092F model, it performed really well. On the test screens, we did not observe any visible banding or disruptions in the colored gradients. The image retains a natural quality, without excessive digital interference, which unfortunately tends to be the norm in this class of equipment. Minimal imperfections appeared in very bright sections, but they are practically imperceptible and do not affect daily use of the television.
5/10
Smooth transition function
Image without overscan on the SD signal
When it comes to how the Samsung U8000F handles lower quality materials, we must admit that Samsung has made progress compared to its predecessor from last year – the DU7192 model, which theoretically occupies the same position in the lineup. This year's model is equipped with a feature for improving the fluidity of tonal transitions, which has been implemented much better than last year. Yes, the TV still uses quite strong algorithms that can distort details or remove film grain, but despite that – it can be confidently said that it works effectively. However, not everything went perfectly. The U8000F has noticeable issues with slight image stuttering when watching very old content in very low resolution. If someone plans to play their old VHS tape, they should be prepared for the image to appear slightly "choppy."
5.5/10
Maximum refresh rate of the panel: 60Hz
Film motion smoothing option: Yes
Blur reduction option: No
BFI function 60Hz: Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
Brightness drop with BFI: 47%
The Samsung U8000F is equipped with a 60 Hz panel, so right from the start, it's clear that we shouldn't expect miracles. This is simply standard in this class – sufficient for everyday viewing but without any frills. The TV offers one motion enhancement slider – a feature called "Motion Blur Reduction," which allows us to adjust the smoothness of the image in movies. Higher settings give a more "theatrical" and smoothed effect, while lower settings help maintain the original character of the film with a slight 24p effect. An interesting feature is "Clear Motion LED," which is a BFI mode – inserting black frames between image frames to improve motion sharpness. However, in practice, the screen flickers heavily when it's activated, and it should be treated more as an experiment than something that genuinely improves gaming comfort.
Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):
Blur (BFI function enabled):
Image flickers in this mode
Smużenie (Upłynniacz ruchu 4K@60Hz):
The smearing can be described as weak. VA 60 Hz panels typically exhibit noticeable blur in dynamic scenes – and that's how the U8092F performs. It's average, although not tragic. For more demanding viewers, this may be noticeable, especially when watching sports or fast-paced shots.
4/10
Samsung U8000F offers a basic set of features for gamers, which nonetheless may be sufficient for less demanding users. It has an automatic game mode – when a game is launched on the console, the TV automatically switches to low latency mode, significantly improving response time. It also includes a VRR feature, or variable refresh rate, which operates in the range of 48 to 60 Hz. This means that both Xbox and PS5 will not produce a "tearing" effect on the screen – as long as we stay within this range.
And unfortunately, that's about it when it comes to advantages. Additions like Game Bar or higher refresh rates are reserved for higher models of Samsung from the 2025 line. In theory, the TV also supports the HGiG function, which should adjust the HDR image to the intentions of game developers. Unfortunately – even though this feature appears in brochures and marketing materials – its configuration on the Xbox console turned out to be... impossible in practice.
10/10
In our tests, the Samsung U8092F performed phenomenally in terms of input lag. Regardless of the resolution, the results were very low, which is truly impressive for this price segment. Therefore, we can confidently say that gaming on this television will not cause irritation due to significant delays between what we do on the controller and what we see on the screen. For most gamers, even the more demanding ones, this result should be more than satisfactory.
SDR | HDR | Dolby Vision |
---|---|---|
1080p60: 11 ms | 2160p60: 11 ms | |
2160p60: 11 ms |
6/10
Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate): Yes
Font clarity: Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes: Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate): 11ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement: BGR
Max refresh rate: 60Hz
G-Sync: No
Working on a computer using this television is a real pleasure. The Samsung U8092F supports chroma 4:4:4, and despite being a version with a VA panel, the readability of fonts is very, very good. The television is also suitable for occasional gaming on a PC, mainly due to its low input lag. However, one must take into account that the G-Sync feature does not work on this model, which is strange because VRR worked without problems when it came to the console.
3.7/10
Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees: 67%
3.8/10
Matrix coating: Satin
Reflection suppression: Decent
Black levels during daytime: Very Good
Thanks to the satin coating on the Samsung U8092F matrix, it does quite well at reducing reflections. The screen doesn't act like a mirror, and the colors – given the capabilities of this class of device – remain fairly saturated, even in somewhat brighter conditions. Unfortunately, the coating alone won't work miracles. The television is simply too dark to effectively cut through very difficult lighting conditions. If we place it against a light source (e.g., a large window or a strong lamp) – unfortunately, we have to reckon with the fact that not everything will be visible on it.
Matrix brightness
Average luminance SDR
Samsung U8000F (VA): 204 cd/m2
5.5/10
System: Tizen
System performance: Decent
Samsung U8092F – like all this year's models from this brand – runs on the Tizen operating system. The system itself is really well-developed: we have access to many applications (though not all), a well-developed smart home integration, and various extras, including exclusive Samsung apps. It also includes features like AirPlay and Chromecast, which make it easy to connect your phone to the TV and share media.
Unfortunately, as this is Samsung's cheapest series in 2025, the manufacturer did not include a solar remote control. In the package, we find a classic infrared remote control that visually resembles a newer version, but unfortunately lacks voice functions. Regarding typical "TV" extras – it lacks a recording feature and a PiP mode (picture in picture). On the plus side, however, is HDMI eARC, which allows for easy control with the included remote, for example, a decoder or soundbar – and it actually works seamlessly.
8.7/10
8.7/10
Maximum photo resolution: | Supported photo formats: |
---|---|
Samsung U8092F handles playback of files rather smoothly – the television supports most popular audio and video formats. Of course, it does not support Dolby Vision, but we simply won’t find that in any Samsung model.
Some reservations can be made about the support for external text files – those that the user would like to add as subtitles to a movie. During our tests, the television only played TXT files, and other extensions, such as SRT or SUB, unfortunately did not work. This may not be a problem for everyone, but it is worth knowing. Perhaps this is an issue to be improved in the future with a system update for the television.
5.7/10
5.7/10
Subjective sound quality
Supported codecs
(TV speakers)
Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
Dolby True HD 7.1
Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
DTS-HD Master Audio
Supported codecs
(external HDMI eARC audio)
Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
Dolby True HD 7.1
Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
DTS-HD Master Audio
U8092F doesn't pretend to have a home theater on board. We get a standard set of 2 x 10 W, which sounds fine but without much excitement, though with a slight bass. For everyday viewing, such an audio setup is more than sufficient. We were pleasantly surprised that it was able to play a movie with the built-in Dolby Atmos codec (JOC) – although of course, we are not talking about true surround sound.
Software version during testing: 1064
Panel uniformity:
Backlight Type: White LED
Founder and originator of the "ChooseTV" portal
Journalist, reviewer, and columnist for the "ChooseTV" portal
Shopping Reviews
The best Samsung TVs 2024 / 2025! Which Samsung TV to choose... 4/30/2025
2/4/2025
1/16/2025
1/15/2025
2/20/2025
Our channel Youtube
Smart calibration of Samsung TV in SmartThing? 6/23/2025