Samsung U8000F (VA) vs SHARP JP7765E

Direct comparison

Check the best price offer:

Samsung U8000F (VA)
$687

U8000F / U8092F

Info

JP7

Available screen sizes: 43”50”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.6

6.1

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.7

    6.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.9

    6.0

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.9

    3.9

  • Gaming on console

    6.6

    6.1

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.0

    5.0

  • Watching in bright light

    3.8

    7.3

  • Utility functions

    5.3

    5.2

  • Apps

    8.7

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    5.7

    6.0

Advantages

  • Nice black and contrast (VA panel version)

  • Advanced Smart system: Tizen

  • Great for working with text - displays fonts very well

  • Basic features for gamers - VRR and ALLM

  • Low input lag

  • Good black and contrast - mini-LED backlight with VA matrix

  • High brightness - handles bright living rooms

  • Google TV system - unlimited base of apps and smart features

  • Very good file player - plays almost everything

  • Mini-jack output - rare and useful headphone jack

  • Extremely loud - up to 90 dB (perfect for seniors)

  • Very attractive price

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness

  • Worse viewing angles compared to the IPS matrix version (Obvious, isn't it? 😉)

  • Infrared remote control

  • Worse appearance than its predecessor

  • Massive smearing and only 60Hz panel

  • Poor mini-LED local dimming algorithms

  • Narrow viewing angles (a natural feature of VA panels)

  • No VRR and HGiG – features for gamers

  • Weird sound – the audio has a "gap" in dialogues

Our verdict

Samsung U8000F with a VA panel is a television that can pleasantly surprise in its class – of course, if we know what to expect from it. Its biggest advantage is definitely the black quality. Compared to the version with an IPS panel, the difference is enormous – the picture gains depth, the contrast looks much better, and evening movie sessions no longer feel like watching content through a gray filter. For a budget segment device, this is truly a nice surprise. The proven Tizen system also deserves credit, which not only works smoothly but also offers access to a full range of applications, support for SmartThings, and a voice assistant (via an app). The PC mode and connection to a console work flawlessly – the fonts are clear and readable. Additionally, it has basic features for gamers, such as VRR and ALLM, which – although they won’t turn this TV into an e-sport machine – are more than sufficient for occasional gaming.

Of course, like any construction in this budget, the U8000F with a VA panel has its limitations. The viewing angles are not one of its strong points – watching the picture from the side easily reveals a drop in quality. Nevertheless, it's hard to consider this a serious drawback – because something has to give. Better black levels are always associated with slightly lesser flexibility in adjustment. When it comes to HDR, we have rather a symbolic approach – the brightness is too low to talk about a true “wow” effect, and the color palette is limited. But let’s face the facts – that’s not why you buy such a TV. So if you're planning to purchase the U8000F, we definitely recommend opting for the version with a VA panel. It's still a very basic model, but in this version, it offers more than one might expect – especially in terms of black quality. And in this price range, that’s quite a lot.

Sharp JP7765 is another offering in the market that tries to prove that Mini-LED technology doesn’t have to cost a fortune. The low price is matched with an exceptionally high brightness — a peak of 1000 nits in HDR is a result that simply impresses in this price range. Although the proprietary processor doesn’t always manage backlighting perfectly in demanding scenes, support for Dolby Vision effectively saves the situation. Thanks to dynamic metadata, the image becomes plastic, deep, and simply appealing to the eye. Adding to this the Google TV system, extreme volume, and a rarely-seen headphone jack, we get a device that is a brilliant option for seniors or less demanding viewers transitioning from basic, cheap LCDs. In such a scenario, the Sharp JP7 appears to be a really decent and cost-effective choice. However, it must be made clear: contrary to marketing slogans, this is not equipment for everyone. Gamers or sports fans will definitely not find themselves here. The biggest drawback of the JP7765 model is the slow, 60Hz panel and significant motion blur, which essentially disqualifies this television when watching dynamic matches or playing fast-paced titles. The image loses sharpness so markedly during rapid movements that for a football or racing fan, it may be an unacceptable barrier.

So who is the Sharp JP7765 for? It is a sensible option for budget-conscious individuals who do not have high demands for motion fluidity but appreciate a “kick” of brightness. By choosing the Sharp JP7, you will definitely make a better deal than purchasing basic (non-dimming) televisions from the competition. Rivals usually offer standard LCD panels at a similar price that cannot compare to the capabilities of even such a basic Mini-LED model as the JP7. Ultimately, it’s a matter of a simple arrangement: you accept weaker motion fluidity in exchange for the powerful brightness that is hard to find with other manufacturers at this price point.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Average
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Black
Silver
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.3/10

7.3/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 160 (10 x 16)

Contrast:

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,600:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,150:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,900:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,750:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,400:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

64,100:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

18,250:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

46,350:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

7,000:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

4,500:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

It is worth noting that the test concerns the variants with a VA matrix, which perform significantly better in terms of black levels and contrast compared to the 55-inch version equipped with an IPS panel. Thanks to the higher native contrast (though it is not a top result among VA matrices), the tested scenes looked much better – without noticeable grayness or the typical washed-out shadow effect found in IPS matrices. The black levels in the U8092F model can be considered really good and satisfying, especially in this price range. Of course, this is not a design equipped with local dimming, so it is hard to expect spectacular results in very challenging scenes. On the other hand, we are talking about an exceptionally budget-friendly television that performs quite solidly within its range.

Moving on to what is most important in Mini-LEDs, namely contrast and black levels, the Sharp JP7 in the 55-inch size we tested utilizes a VA panel. Combined with backlighting split into 160 zones (in a 10x16 configuration), this promises truly solid performance. Measurements on static film test images can be downright shocking, with measured contrast reaching five-digit values, even hitting levels of 50,000:1. On paper, this is a result that much more expensive models would not be ashamed of, and black levels under these conditions look very attractive.

Unfortunately, a television is purchased for watching films, not for admiring static images, and this is where the charm wears off a bit. When something more starts happening on the screen—especially in complicated, dark scenes with a lot of small bright elements—the backlighting system in the JP7 begins to literally go haywire. The zones can "dance" before the viewer's eyes, turning on and off in a way that can be simply annoying and detracts from the action. It is clear that Sharp has a huge room for improvement regarding local dimming management. The hardware potential in the form of Mini-LEDs is significant, but the controlling algorithms clearly struggle to tame them.

HDR effect quality

3.1/10

5.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 79.1%, Bt.2020: 58.5%
DCI P3: 94.0%, Bt.2020: 70.1%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

212 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

173 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

265 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

90 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

1014 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

247 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

606 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

180 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

605 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

SHARP JP7765E

Samsung U8000F (VA)

While the U8000F with a VA panel can still be praised for decent blacks, there are no longer any reasons to be impressed regarding brightness – especially in HDR scenes. The television reaches a maximum of just under 250 nits, which is simply too little to talk about any impressive light effects. Bright elements come off as pale, and scenes that should shine look rather flat. An interesting situation was observed during the test of a scene from the movie Sicario 2 – the screen noticeably darkened, as if the television were trying to hide its limitations in displaying blacks. One might get the impression that the device artificially darkens the image to improve contrast, but in practice, the effect doesn't make much of a difference, other than that we see less on the screen. Additionally, there's the issue of colors – the U8000F does not support a wide color gamut, so don't expect vibrant, saturated shades known from better models. The HDR image here resembles slightly brightened SDR and… maybe that’s even a good thing. For this model, it's not worth setting expectations for cinematic experiences – it's better to treat HDR as a modest addition.

So how does the brightness of the Sharp JP7 perform in the most demanding titles? Honestly: at first, we were quite surprised. The television is capable of achieving over 1000 nits of brightness, which is an outstanding and rarely seen result for a device costing just under 2000 zł (for 55 inches). Watching bright, full-screen scenes, one can get the impression that we are dealing with truly good equipment. However, unfortunately, we must return to the problem we mentioned earlier regarding local dimming management. When small, bright elements appear on a dark background on the screen (like in the test scenes from Life of Pi or Sicario 2), it is noticeable how poorly the JP7 handles the zones. The television dims them almost to the maximum, stifling the whole HDR effect, which at such moments resembles a flat SDR image (less than 200 nits). This instability makes the image on the JP7 unfortunately lose its appeal in demanding, contrast-heavy films.

As a consolation, it is worth noting that the panel has the potential for good color display. A PFS (phosphor) filter has been implemented here, allowing the coverage of the DCI-P3 palette to reach a solid 94%. The manufacturer calls its product a “QLED,” even though it is mainly based technologically on the aforementioned PFS filter. Considering the recent market battles among manufacturers about what can and cannot be called QLED, we leave the issue of the correctness of this naming to your judgment. However, it remains a fact that the potential for reproducing saturated colors in this panel is simply good.

Factory color reproduction

6.5/10

4/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

The Samsung U8000F has been tested by us in the best picture mode available out of the box – namely, Filmmaker Mode. This profile is supposed to provide a neutral, cinematic image, free of unnecessary enhancements and artificial beautifications. In the case of SDR content – mainly in HD or SD resolution – the television performed surprisingly well right out of the box. The only noticeable imperfection was brightness management. The gamma chart showed some deviations – slight brightening or dimming of certain tones – but in practice, it did not significantly affect the viewing experience. For a television in this segment, it performs quite well.

However, the situation is considerably weaker in HDR mode. Although white balance was still acceptable, color errors were very pronounced. In the Color Checker test, almost every sample was outside the target point, and the image itself looked unnatural – colors were shifted, sometimes too cool, at other times simply dull and lifeless. The main problem lies in the hardware limitations – the U8000F does not support the wide color gamut of DCI-P3, so it is physically unable to reproduce the colors anticipated by the HDR standard. And unfortunately, this is evident in almost every more demanding scene.

When it comes to out-of-the-box colors, the Sharp JP7 was tested in Film mode, which traditionally offers the most consistent image compared to the yellowed “Eco” mode or the glaring blue of the “Dynamic” mode. Although this is the best choice among the available settings, the results are still far from ideal. The white balance clearly lacked red and blue components, causing many scenes to take on an unnatural, greenish tint. Another issue was the gamma – during fullscreen scenes, the television provides too much brightness, completely stripping away its cinematic character. All of this translated into color reproduction errors, particularly with shades of gray, which exceeded Delta E 10. Just to remind: errors above 2-3 are already noticeable to the human eye, so here we are dealing with a significant distortion of reality.

In HDR mode, the situation is reversed but not any better. Here, the blue color dominates the white balance, giving the image an unnatural, almost “store-like” sharpness reminiscent of aggressive demo modes. Furthermore, the measurements of the EOTF curve emphasize the store-like nature of the image. The graph clearly shows that the television generates an image significantly brighter than the standards predict, resulting in an artificially boosted and unrealistic final effect. The Sharp JP7 is evidently trying to appear stronger than it actually is, but it does so at the expense of fidelity to the content.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.5/10

6.7/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Right out of the box, the U8000F offered quite a decent picture in SDR for its price range. However, we managed to slightly enhance it – we reduced a subtle purple tint and improved the gamma characteristics, giving it a more natural curve. Despite these adjustments, the TV still tends to brighten the brightest details a bit too aggressively – the gamma graph shows a clear dip that cannot be fully corrected.

On the other hand, in HDR mode, it is noticeably weaker. It's hard to talk about any significant improvement here – despite attempts to tweak the settings, the picture still presents considerable color errors. A Delta E exceeding 7 means noticeable deviations that couldn't be effectively reduced. Unfortunately, this is a limitation of the design itself – the U8000F was simply not designed for serious HDR. In everyday SDR viewing, it performs quite well, but when it comes to HDR content... it's best not to have too high expectations.

We subjected the JP7 to our standard calibration procedure and truly... the television gained a new life thanks to it, especially in SDR content (YouTube, classic television, series, or older movies). Because we managed to accurately set the white balance and stabilize the gamma, color errors dropped to a value of below 3. This is a level at which the human eye has trouble detecting discrepancies. In this scenario, the Sharp JP7 delivers an image with really great color accuracy, which is a significant advantage in this price range. However, the content in HDR turned out to be much more problematic. Here, despite our efforts and adjustments to the settings, the television simply did not want to cooperate. In the JP7 menu, we cannot find any option that would allow for real control over brightness management (EOTF). Although a significant portion of color errors was reduced, the image still remained unnaturally oversaturated. It's a pity because the potential of the mini-LED backlit panel is large, but the software presents a clear barrier.

The conclusion is simple: when watching less demanding content (SDR) on the JP7, you can expect an image that is more than satisfactory, but in HDR, you have to come to terms with a certain degree of "artificiality" that cannot be overcome even with professional equipment.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.5/10

7.5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

One of the key elements influencing the perception of the image is the way the television handles tonal transitions – that is, the blending of colors and shades without clear boundaries. In the case of the Samsung U8092F model, it performed really well. On the test screens, we did not observe any visible banding or disruptions in the colored gradients. The image retains a natural quality, without excessive digital interference, which unfortunately tends to be the norm in this class of equipment. Minimal imperfections appeared in very bright sections, but they are practically imperceptible and do not affect daily use of the television.

When it comes to image purity, posterization on the Sharp JP7 fortunately doesn't distract too much from the content being viewed. In most scenes, it's hard to spot irritating stripes or the so-called "color stair stepping," which often ruin the experience in scenes with flat colors. Of course, you can't expect miracles here because in some extremely demanding scenes, a trained eye may notice errors in tonal transitions. However, this is not a level that could realistically distract during a film. Well, unless you have good eyesight and are looking for artifacts on the screen – then you'll probably find something.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5/10

3.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

When it comes to how the Samsung U8000F handles lower quality materials, we must admit that Samsung has made progress compared to its predecessor from last year – the DU7192 model, which theoretically occupies the same position in the lineup. This year's model is equipped with a feature for improving the fluidity of tonal transitions, which has been implemented much better than last year. Yes, the TV still uses quite strong algorithms that can distort details or remove film grain, but despite that – it can be confidently said that it works effectively. However, not everything went perfectly. The U8000F has noticeable issues with slight image stuttering when watching very old content in very low resolution. If someone plans to play their old VHS tape, they should be prepared for the image to appear slightly "choppy."

When it comes to lower quality materials and how the Sharp JP7 handles them, the situation is ambiguous. Let's start with the upscaling – here we have no major objections. The process of scaling the image to a higher resolution is correct; the image remains readable and clear, without the overscan effect or cropped edges. Of course, this is not at the level of top models and at times one can notice slight jaggedness on the contours, but in this price range, the effect is fully acceptable.

However, the digital image processing itself is significantly worse, as aside from the scaling, it virtually does not exist. In the JP7 menu, we won't find any option that would effectively smooth out unwanted tonal transitions or reduce noise in the image. As a result, the signal reaches the matrix in a very raw form, which, with heavily compressed materials (e.g., from YouTube), leads to visible posterization. Either this is a flaw in the software or a very strange design decision, as in earlier Sharp models, this feature was available and, more importantly, worked with noticeable effect. Here we are left at the mercy of what the source provides, without any digital support from the image processor.

Blur and motion smoothness

4/10

2/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
-
BFI function 120Hz
-
-
Brightness drop with BFI
47%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (Upłynniacz ruchu 4K@60Hz):

Blur ():

The Samsung U8000F is equipped with a 60 Hz panel, so right from the start, it's clear that we shouldn't expect miracles. This is simply standard in this class – sufficient for everyday viewing but without any frills. The TV offers one motion enhancement slider – a feature called "Motion Blur Reduction," which allows us to adjust the smoothness of the image in movies. Higher settings give a more "theatrical" and smoothed effect, while lower settings help maintain the original character of the film with a slight 24p effect. An interesting feature is "Clear Motion LED," which is a BFI mode – inserting black frames between image frames to improve motion sharpness. However, in practice, the screen flickers heavily when it's activated, and it should be treated more as an experiment than something that genuinely improves gaming comfort.

The motion fluidity on the Sharp JP7 is very mediocre, and the reason is simple: the television uses a 60Hz panel. This immediately makes it difficult to recommend for watching sports or serious gaming, where higher refresh rates are already the standard. The only real plus is the presence of a motion smoother, which we can control in movies using a slider called De-judder. Lower settings produce a more raw, "cinematic" (frame-based) image, while higher settings add artificial fluidity. We suggest setting it somewhere in the middle of the scale, that is, in the 3-5 range – this is the best compromise to avoid the soap opera effect while getting rid of the tiring image stutter. Interestingly, in the menu, we also find a slider for "motion blur reduction," which usually suggests the presence of a 120Hz panel. However, in the case of the JP7, it does not contribute anything to the image and serves more as a placeholder – it is meant to look good in the settings, but technically it should not function on this panel.

Console compatibility and gaming features

5.3/10

4/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    No
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    No
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    No
    Yes

[UPDATE] We have updated our 2025 Samsung TV reviews following the release of firmware version 1131, which officially restores the essential HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) support.

Samsung U8000F offers a basic set of features for gamers, which nonetheless may be sufficient for less demanding users. It has an automatic game mode – when a game is launched on the console, the TV automatically switches to low latency mode, significantly improving response time. It also includes a VRR feature, or variable refresh rate, which operates in the range of 48 to 60 Hz. This means that both Xbox and PS5 will not produce a "tearing" effect on the screen – as long as we stay within this range.

And unfortunately, that's about it when it comes to advantages. Additions like Game Bar or higher refresh rates are reserved for higher models of Samsung from the 2025 line. In theory, the TV also supports the HGiG function, which should adjust the HDR image to the intentions of game developers. Unfortunately – even though this feature appears in brochures and marketing materials – its configuration on the Xbox console turned out to be... impossible in practice.

As we mentioned earlier, the 60Hz panel is not a feature that will attract gamers to the Sharp JP7. Perhaps for the casual gamer, whose console generates most titles at 60 frames per second, there might be something interesting? When it comes to specific additions, we find:

  • ALLM Mode: Automatically switches the TV to low latency game mode (input lag).

  • Game Menu: Which is hard to call a full-fledged “Game Bar,” as its functionality is minimal. Besides enabling ALLM, there is only a smoothness enhancer dedicated to games, which we recommend against because it introduces very noticeable artifacts and spoils the responsiveness.

  • Dolby Vision Gaming: For Microsoft's consoles.

Unfortunately, the list of shortcomings is much longer and more painful than the positives. The biggest disappointment is the lack of support for 120Hz, even when lowering the resolution to Full HD. The presence of 120Hz would allow for performance modes to be activated in many games on PS5 or Xbox Series X. Another absence is VRR, which means that during frame drops, we are susceptible to image tearing. The lack of proper implementation of the HGiG standard is also very problematic. This results in the fact that during HDR calibration in the console menu, it is very easy to “overshoot” the brightness settings. As a result, instead of clear details in highlights, we end up with an unnaturally over-brightened image with cut-off details. The Sharp JP7 is a proposal only for very casual gamers.

Input lag

10/10

9.3/10

SDR

1080p60
11 ms
13 ms
1080p120
29 ms
2160p60
11 ms
13 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
11 ms
13 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
13 ms
2160p120 DV

In our tests, the Samsung U8092F performed phenomenally in terms of input lag. Regardless of the resolution, the results were very low, which is truly impressive for this price segment. Therefore, we can confidently say that gaming on this television will not cause irritation due to significant delays between what we do on the controller and what we see on the screen. For most gamers, even the more demanding ones, this result should be more than satisfactory.

The issue of input lag in the Sharp JP7 is quite intriguing. In all 60Hz modes, the television boasts a result of just 13 ms. This is truly an excellent result, making the lag practically unnoticeable during gameplay. In this respect, Sharp has risen to the occasion, and even in dynamic titles, the controls remain responsive.

However, during our tests, we encountered a certain technical puzzle. Using our professional Murideo generator, we were able to force and measure the input lag at 120Hz refresh rate in Full HD resolution. This sounds promising, but in reality, it is merely a "paper" curiosity, as standard external devices such as consoles or computers were unable to force the Sharp to operate in such a mode. Although professional diagnostic tools see some hidden potential here, for the end user, the JP7 remains just a 60 Hz screen.

Compatibility with PC

6/10

5/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Average
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
11ms
13ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Working on a computer using this television is a real pleasure. The Samsung U8092F supports chroma 4:4:4, and despite being a version with a VA panel, the readability of fonts is very, very good. The television is also suitable for occasional gaming on a PC, mainly due to its low input lag. However, one must take into account that the G-Sync feature does not work on this model, which is strange because VRR worked without problems when it came to the console.

The Sharp JP7 performs adequately as a monitor. Although the readability of standard fonts on a white or black background is acceptable, the sharpness clearly drops with darker and thinner text, which makes long work with text difficult. For occasional news browsing in a browser, this panel is sufficient; however, we strongly discourage using it as a permanent screen for PC gaming. Besides the rigid limitation to 60Hz, the TV does not support any form of frame synchronization (lack of G-Sync and FreeSync), which, combined with the enormous blurring of the panel, makes the user experience in dynamic scenarios simply poor.

Viewing angles

3.7/10

3.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
67%
77%

The Sharp JP7 uses a VA panel, which automatically means narrow viewing angles. It's a classic compromise: we get quite decent black levels and contrast, but at the expense of image degradation when viewed from the side. At an angle, the colors clearly fade and lose their saturation, so the JP7 is definitely a device meant for watching "straight on," rather than from the corner of the couch.

Daytime performance

3.8/10

7.3/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Panel brightness

SHARP JP7765E: 708 cd/m2

Samsung U8000F (VA): 204 cd/m2

Thanks to the satin coating on the Samsung U8092F matrix, it does quite well at reducing reflections. The screen doesn't act like a mirror, and the colors – given the capabilities of this class of device – remain fairly saturated, even in somewhat brighter conditions. Unfortunately, the coating alone won't work miracles. The television is simply too dark to effectively cut through very difficult lighting conditions. If we place it against a light source (e.g., a large window or a strong lamp) – unfortunately, we have to reckon with the fact that not everything will be visible on it.

The satin coating used in the Sharp JP7 matrix effectively reduces reflections, although it is still far from fully matte. However, the true "game changer" in bright rooms is the brightness of the device itself with SDR content. An average score of 700 nits and peaks around 1000 nits is an outstanding result in the segment under 2000 PLN. Thanks to such high luminance, the television can easily handle even well-lit living rooms. One just needs to be cautious of direct reflections, e.g., from a window across, because the satin material used here will not eliminate them completely, but at this brightness, the image remains readable.

Panel details

Backlight Type
White LED
Mini-LED PFS LED
Software version during testing
1064
UKN4.250714.091
Image processor
MT5896 2GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV Panel details
Review SHARP JP7765E TV Panel details

TV features

5.3/10

5.2/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review SHARP JP7765E TV features
Review SHARP JP7765E TV features
Review SHARP JP7765E TV features
Review SHARP JP7765E TV features

Samsung U8092F – like all this year's models from this brand – runs on the Tizen operating system. The system itself is really well-developed: we have access to many applications (though not all), a well-developed smart home integration, and various extras, including exclusive Samsung apps. It also includes features like AirPlay and Chromecast, which make it easy to connect your phone to the TV and share media.

Unfortunately, as this is Samsung's cheapest series in 2025, the manufacturer did not include a solar remote control. In the package, we find a classic infrared remote control that visually resembles a newer version, but unfortunately lacks voice functions. Regarding typical "TV" extras – it lacks a recording feature and a PiP mode (picture in picture). On the plus side, however, is HDMI eARC, which allows for easy control with the included remote, for example, a decoder or soundbar – and it actually works seamlessly.

Smart TV Features - Google TV

The main advantage of the Sharp JP7 is the Google TV system, which at this moment offers the widest access to applications on the market. The library is almost unlimited – from all popular streaming services to niche VOD solutions or media players. The system provides great freedom of personalization and access to the latest versions of popular platforms. In the package, we get a Bluetooth remote that allows using the built-in voice assistant without having to point at the TV. The only significant lack in the multimedia sphere that we encountered is the absence of AirPlay support. Users of Apple devices, such as the iPhone or iPad, will not be able to directly and wirelessly stream content to the screen of this Sharp.

Classic Features and Connections

Regarding traditional television features, the Sharp JP7 offers nothing beyond the market standard. It lacks the ability to record programs to external storage (PVR) and a dual tuner, which excludes the use of the picture-in-picture (PiP) function. The TV only provides basic solutions, such as teletext and the ability to wirelessly connect accessories via Bluetooth. Gemini Message Content

As for the connections, the Sharp JP7 offers 4 HDMI ports, which the manufacturer proudly describes as standard 2.1. However, it must be made clear: this is a purely marketing move because in practice these ports only offer full functionality of standard 2.0 due to the limitations of the television. However, it is a plus that there is a classic mini-jack headphone output, which allows connecting older audio sets or speakers without the need for adapters or the HDMI eARC standard. This is quite a rare and very practical addition lately.

Apps

8.7/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.3/10

9.4/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

Samsung U8092F handles playback of files rather smoothly – the television supports most popular audio and video formats. Of course, it does not support Dolby Vision, but we simply won’t find that in any Samsung model.

Some reservations can be made about the support for external text files – those that the user would like to add as subtitles to a movie. During our tests, the television only played TXT files, and other extensions, such as SRT or SUB, unfortunately did not work. This may not be a problem for everyone, but it is worth knowing. Perhaps this is an issue to be improved in the future with a system update for the television.

When it comes to media playback from external sources, the Sharp JP7 performs simply exceptionally. The built-in player is a true surprise, as it handled virtually every file format we provided. It even managed to support the HEIC format (primarily used in Apple devices), which most televisions struggle with. Here, Sharp displayed photos without the slightest hiccup. Of course, a significant advantage is the presence of the Google TV system, which allows for the installation of external applications like VLC or Kodi in case of any issues. In our opinion, however, this will be an unnecessary measure because the factory player is refined and versatile enough to satisfy even the most demanding users.

Sound

5.7/10

6/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    89dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

U8092F doesn't pretend to have a home theater on board. We get a standard set of 2 x 10 W, which sounds fine but without much excitement, though with a slight bass. For everyday viewing, such an audio setup is more than sufficient. We were pleasantly surprised that it was able to play a movie with the built-in Dolby Atmos codec (JOC) – although of course, we are not talking about true surround sound.

The sound produced by the JP7765E model can be described as atypical, and even – looking at our measurements – rather peculiar. What stands out first is the enormous volume scale. The TV can reach a level of almost 90 decibels (89 dBC on the chart), which is almost a record result in this class. Such strong "loudness" will certainly appeal to seniors or people who need a device with a very high volume.

However, a glance at the frequency chart explains why the sound seems so "strange." The characteristic is extremely uneven: we have a solid boost in the lower registers (around 200 Hz) and in the high tones, but the mid-range – where most of the information about the human voice is located (between 500 Hz and 1.5 kHz) – experiences a huge drop. This makes the sound unnatural and can seem "recessed" at key moments in dialogues.

On the plus side, we have support for the Dolby Atmos format. However, it must be honestly admitted that to truly feel the potential of this system, it will be necessary to connect at least a decent soundbar. The JP7's own speakers, although very loud, cannot deliver the cinematic depth and precision that this standard requires.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

89dBC (Max)

75dBC