Hisense U7Q vs TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Direct comparison

U7Q / U78Q

Info

C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”100”

Available screen sizes: 50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: VIDAA

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.1

6.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.7

    5.9

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.8

    6.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.3

    5.3

  • Gaming on console

    8.0

    7.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    1.7

  • Watching in bright light

    6.2

    6.6

  • Utility functions

    8.9

    7.0

  • Apps

    7.7

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    7.2

    6.5

Advantages

  • Great contrast and deep black

  • Very good smoothness of tonal transitions (close to reference level)

  • High brightness

  • Supports 4K 144 Hz and even 240 Hz in Full HD

  • VRR, ALLM, G-SYNC – a full package for gamers

  • Low input lag

  • Pleasant sound with a light bass

  • Many classic TV functions built into the VIDAA system

  • Very good contrast and black: VA panel and MINI-LED backlighting

  • Pretty high (around 600 nits)

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, HGiG

  • Additional mode for gamers: 120Hz and 144Hz

  • Google TV system with a wide range of applications

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Quite pleasant sound from the built-in speakers

Disadvantages

No like
  • Lack of support for HGiG (hinders HDR setup on consoles)

  • Brightness management issues

  • Poor viewing angles – typical for VA panels

  • Closed VIDAA system – missing some applications

  • The matrix is heavily smudged

  • Strong visible dithering (looks like artificial 4K)

  • Very poor compatibility with PC

  • Minor system errors

  • Significant chaos in naming (many derivative models that differ in no way)

Our verdict

The Hisense U7Q is one of the most interesting Mini-LED televisions in its price segment, clearly showing that Hisense is really starting to matter in the market not only because of the price-to-capabilities ratio but also due to its increasingly refined picture quality. Let’s start with what truly impresses: the contrast and black levels are at a level that was recently unattainable in this price range. Combined with smooth tonal transitions, solid brightness, and a fast 144 Hz panel, the U7Q becomes a television that excels in both movies and gaming. Gamers will find nearly everything they could expect here – variable refresh rate (VRR) support, auto low latency mode (ALLM), very low input lag, and even 240 Hz in Full HD. All of this means that the U7Q will perform well with both next-generation consoles and PCs. However, it is not without its weaknesses. With HDR content, one might want to say: "untapped potential" – you may ask why? The television’s algorithms dim small bright elements or overly boost them, which can spoil the viewing experience. There is also a lack of support for HGiG, which is a feature that would better synchronize the console with the television for HDR. In summary, briefly – the Hisense U7Q is a very versatile and complete television that has its imperfections but makes up for them in many key aspects. For gamers, for occasional movie watchers, for someone looking for good equipment for everyday use – it is one of the most cost-effective propositions in 2025. One just needs to know what compromises they are signing up for – and then it will be hard to be disappointed.

TCL C6KS (also known as C69KS and Q6CS) is a television that on paper promised to be a hit in the "value for money" category. And indeed, in many ways it's a successful piece of equipment: thanks to Mini-LED backlighting, we get good black levels and brightness that rivals more expensive models. In fact, it's identical to the slightly more expensive C6K model, which we've already tested for you. Additionally, it features the same excellent Google TV system and surprisingly rich gaming features, making it enjoyable to play even with a 60 Hz panel. Unfortunately, the positive impression is marred by the performance of the panel used. The television suffers from noticeable motion blur, and aggressive dithering (digital grain) makes the image often appear unnatural and artificial—as if it were being forced to be sharper. Ultimately, the biggest problem with the C6KS isn’t its flaws, but rather its sibling, the C6K. At its current price, this model finds itself in a strange "middle ground." It costs almost the same (or just slightly less) as the full-fledged TCL C6K, which offers a significantly better 120 Hz panel and is simply a complete design without those annoying flaws. The C6KS is a compromise model that will only become attractive under one condition—if its price drops drastically. For now, opting for the (often symbolic) additional cost to the C6K model remains a much safer and better choice. One could mischievously state that the letter "S" in the name actually stands for "Slim." It's just that it's not about an exceptionally slim case, but about how much this model has been "slimmed down" in terms of capabilities compared to the full-fledged C6K.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Good
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
No
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.5/10

7.5/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 220 (10 x 22)

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 180 (10 x 18)

Contrast:

Review Hisense U7Q Contrast and black detail

Result

278,000:1

Review Hisense U7Q Contrast and black detail

Result

28,800:1

Review Hisense U7Q Contrast and black detail

Result

11,100:1

Review Hisense U7Q Contrast and black detail

Result

10,800:1

Review Hisense U7Q Contrast and black detail

Result

6,250:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

129,650:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

26,650:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

12,900:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

12,600:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

6,250:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The U7Q is a television with Mini-LED backlighting – just like the PRO version. The difference? The version without the suffix simply has fewer dimming zones. In our 65-inch model with a VA panel, we counted 220 of them. And although this doesn't make as much of an impression as in the U7Q PRO, it still looks very good on paper for this price range. Alright, but how does it perform in practice? Surprisingly well. The contrast in the U7Q can reach up to 300,000:1, which provides a really solid black effect. In many scenes, it's hard to find fault – the image has depth, and the highlights are well separated. Of course, Mini-LED is not OLED – so there are certain limitations. In very challenging scenes with a lot of dark details, the television sometimes either "eats" them, leaving a nice black, or slightly brightens the background, which can cause a halo effect. This is normal in this technology and must be taken into account. Despite these minor drawbacks – the contrast in the U7Q performs really well.

Let's move on to what tigers like best, which is black and contrast. If you were worried that the lower price of the C6KS model (C69KS/Q6CS) was due to drastic cuts in image quality, I have great news for you regarding black levels and contrast. In direct comparison with the more expensive C6K, the tested model hardly falls short at all. Just like in the higher series, we find a VA panel supported by a local dimming system. What’s most interesting – and here’s a big surprise – during the tests, we counted exactly the same number of dimming zones in the C6KS (of the same size) as in the tested more expensive counterpart! The black levels are very good. The contrast measurement results speak for themselves – for such a relatively inexpensive television, the black is deep and free from major issues that often plague budget models without local dimming. Of course, we can't cheat physics. We must expect that in very demanding scenes (e.g., bright text on a black background), we will sometimes notice undesirable effects such as blooming (halo effect around bright objects). However, this is not something that disqualifies this television – overall, the black levels are at a very decent, satisfying level.

HDR effect quality

4.6/10

4.9/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 93.5%, Bt.2020: 70.5%
DCI P3: 92.0%, Bt.2020: 71.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Hisense U7Q Brightness measurement

Result

521 nit

Review Hisense U7Q Brightness measurement

Result

160 nit

Review Hisense U7Q Brightness measurement

Result

351 nit

Review Hisense U7Q Brightness measurement

Result

98 nit

Review Hisense U7Q Brightness measurement

Result

674 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

602 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

204 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

421 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

152 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

590 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Hisense U7Q

Since the algorithms responsible for blacks are performing quite well, we expected a similarly good effect when it comes to brightness and overall HDR quality. Unfortunately – here we have to disappoint you a bit.

The U7Q is quite a bright TV – in optimal conditions, it can reach around 800 nits, which indeed impresses on some screens, especially in scenes like those from the movie The Meg. Bright segments can really shine, and the HDR effect is noticeable. The problem arises when very small, bright elements appear on a dark background – for example, in Sicario 2 or in the second scene of the movie Life of Pi. In such moments, the dimming algorithms operate too aggressively. Yes, the blacks look great then, but the brightest points can almost completely fade, causing the HDR effect to disappear and details to be barely visible. That's just the nature of this technology in this price segment.

As a consolation, it's worth adding that the U7Q is advertised as a QLED TV (in practice, a PFS layer is used, which works very similarly), and it is indeed capable of displaying a wide color palette – with DCI-P3 coverage at around 94%, that's a very good result for this class.

And how does the issue of HDR look? Here the C6KS performs quite well and – as is becoming a recurring theme in this review – identically to the C6K model. The maximum brightness generated by this television is around 600 nits. In bright scenes, this translates to a really solid, cinematic effect, and generally, the video materials look good here. However, one must remember the specifics of the dimming algorithm in this model. When very small, bright points (e.g., stars) appear against a dark background, the television can dim them quite significantly. The goal is simple: to eliminate blooming and maintain the best possible black levels. It’s a reasonable compromise. Most viewers will definitely appreciate deep, “true black” more than additional micro-details that could cause grayness on the screen. Such is the nature of local dimming technology in this price range, and one must be aware of it. It’s also worth noting that the TCL C69KS (C6KS) has an additional PFS coating, which is marketed under the tagline of QLED technology. Thanks to this, the colors are saturated and vibrant – our measurements showed that the coverage of a wide color gamut reaches 92% here.

Factory color reproduction

6.3/10

5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the U7Q in the best possible picture mode, which is Filmmaker Mode. This mode is supposed to provide the most "filmic" experience and fidelity to the creators' intent – right out of the box. Unfortunately, even this professionally sounding name does not guarantee a perfect picture.

In our unit, the problem lay in a poorly set white balance. Both in HD and 4K content, the image had too much blue and red, giving the screen a slightly pinkish hue. It didn't look terrible, but it was noticeable – especially in bright scenes and white backgrounds. This alone could have been forgiven, but the biggest issue is the management of brightness in HDR content. The EOTF curve from the measurements confirms what we saw earlier during the scene tests: the television often dims the smallest bright elements too much, causing them to almost disappear, or conversely – excessively brightens the brightest ones, affecting the naturalness of the image.

Unlike the more expensive C6K model, the tested C6KS does not have an option labeled Filmmaker Mode in the menu. Is this a reason to cry? Absolutely not. Our tests have shown that in practice, in terms of color reproduction, the absence of this specific label makes virtually no difference. The best available Film/Cinema mode here offers nearly identical picture characteristics to the aforementioned Filmmaker mode in the more expensive model. So we get a very similar image, just under a different name. So if you were wondering whether paying extra for the C6K gives you better colors – the answer is: no, in both cases the base is the same and requires slight adjustments.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.4/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Thanks to specialized tools, we managed to correct the color quality in SDR content to nearly perfection. In materials with lower dynamics, delta E errors dropped below 0.5, which can be considered an almost reference result. The image on television, YouTube, or classic Full HD looks really good after calibration. Well, but where couldn’t we improve the image so easily? Primarily, it concerns HDR quality content. While we managed to somewhat "tame" the white balance and eliminate pink hues in most scenes, unfortunately, we did not have full control over brightness management. We set the local dimming settings according to the best observations – SDR: Medium, HDR: High – but the U7Q still did everything a bit its own way. There were still cases of overly strong dimming or brightening of details that the calibration simply couldn't eliminate. And although the overall reception of the content is much better, it must be taken into account that the U7Q will always have something to say at the end "but."

Thanks to the white balance adjustment, the tendency of the C69KS to distort colors has been effectively reduced, leading to a very good final effect. After calibration, we won't see excessive warmth in SDR scenes or overly cool tones in HDR. However, it's worth noting the brightness characteristic. In SDR content, there are hardly any objections – the image looks very good, especially in older films, television programs, or materials from YouTube. It is much more difficult to evaluate the performance of the television in HDR. Analysis of the EOTF curve suggests correct behavior, but its practical variant shows certain limitations. The C69KS can overly brighten the smallest elements of the frame, while at other times it can dim the entire scene. Calibration has therefore brought clear benefits in terms of color reproduction, but certain limitations arising from the operation of local dimming and the way it is controlled by the C69KS cannot be avoided, as we also saw in the C6K test.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.9/10

4.8/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The U7Q performs exceptionally well when it comes to tonal transitions – we can confidently say that it reaches almost reference level, which is why in this category, the TV receives one of the highest possible ratings from us. The color blends are smooth, clean, and without visible bands. In most scenes, everything looks simply perfect, and any potential minor imperfections may only appear in very specific shots – although we hardly noticed them during testing.

Looking solely at the smoothness of tonal transitions, the C69KS gives no real reason for complaints. The gradation of colors proceeds correctly, and more challenging sequences do not reveal significant problems. Therefore, you might be surprised by the low score in this category. This is due to very strong dithering and artificially boosted "resolution," leading to a grainy and unnatural character of the image. For this reason, the final score is significantly lower, despite the correct gradation of the tonal transitions themselves.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

There are situations where we would like to smooth out tonal transitions a bit, especially in older materials – those that have limited source quality. The U7Q is equipped with a feature called “Smooth and Gradient Image,” but unfortunately… it works very poorly. In the “Low” option, the effects are practically unnoticeable, and other settings smooth out details but do not improve tonal transitions. The only plus is that the feature does not interfere with film grain, so it does not ruin the natural structure of the image.

Fortunately, content scaling performs quite well. The image is not overly sharpened, there is no artificial clarity – and although it is known that this is not the level of high-end televisions, the U7Q handles displaying really old content in a completely acceptable manner without any problem.

C69KS handles upscaling quite well. The tested 576p material looks surprisingly decent – a significant amount of detail is preserved, and the algorithm adds a subtle "rounding" effect to sharp edges, making the image appear more cohesive. However, the smoothing of tonal transitions is lacking. The television practically cannot improve them, leaving the image in a somewhat raw state. With older materials, this can be simply exhausting, as the lack of additional processing highlights all imperfections.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.1/10

4.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
No
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
No
Brightness drop with BFI
77%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur (1080p 240Hz):

Blur (4K@144Hz):

U7Q is truly a fast television, similar to its more powerful version "PRO". At a resolution of 4K, it supports up to 144 Hz refresh rate, and if someone wants even more – in Full HD you can achieve up to 240 Hz! This will mainly benefit PC gamers, but it’s worth appreciating – this is a rare feature in this price segment. Right from the start, it’s clear that U7Q was created with dynamic content in mind, such as games or sports. In films, we are not left "out in the cold" either – U7Q offers the "Ultra Motion Smoothness" feature, where using two sliders you can adjust whether you want a smoother, theatrical image, or something closer to a cinematic style with a visible frame. It’s good that, like with most manufacturers, we have a choice here and can adjust it to our own preferences.

C69KS offers a simplified motion improvement panel in movies, allowing you to adjust the intensity of the effect using a slider. This makes it easy to match the smoothness to your own preferences. The possibility of using higher refresh rates is also a plus – even though the panel operates natively at 4K at 60 Hz, lowering the resolution to 1440p allows you to enable 120 and 144 Hz modes, both on consoles and PC. This sounds like great news, but in practice, the image at these settings suffers from significant motion blur. The effect is noticeable enough that the overall experience feels simply mediocre and loses its appeal in everyday use.

Console compatibility and gaming features

8.5/10

8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 240Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The Hisense U7Q is a TV designed for gamers – and you can see that right away based on its gaming capabilities. It has practically everything you could wish for: variable refresh rate (VRR) – check, automatic game mode (ALLM) – also check, and high refresh rates of up to 240 Hz in Full HD, as well as support for various resolutions, not just 4K. It's truly a great set of features that makes the U7Q excel in both fast-paced shooters on consoles and more demanding titles on PC. Of course – like in most Hisense models – it lacks a proper implementation of the HGiG function. That's a shame because HGiG allows you to adjust the brightness of the console to the specific TV, which in practice makes displaying HDR games according to the creators' intentions much easier. Without this, you simply have to reckon with certain limitations in the final HDR image in games.

If we overlook the smearing and lack of native 4K at 120 Hz, the C69KS impresses with how well it performs during gaming. We get everything you can expect from a gaming television: variable refresh rate (VRR), automatic switching to game mode (ALLM), Dolby Vision Gaming mode, and a reasonably functioning HGiG. The TV can also operate at 120 and even 144 Hz at lower resolutions, allowing for smoother gameplay on console or PC. Additionally, there is a clear Game Bar that lets you quickly glance at key settings during gaming. As a result — despite a few limitations — the C69KS can be a truly successful screen for gamers.

Input lag

9.7/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
17 ms
9 ms
1080p120
9 ms
2160p60
17 ms
9 ms
2160p120
9 ms

HDR

2160p60
17 ms
9 ms
2160p120
9 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
28 ms
9 ms
2160p120 DV
19 ms

Input lag on the U7Q is really impressive. With 120 Hz content, we recorded around 9 ms, and with 60 Hz – around 17 ms. These are outstanding results that make the TV perform excellently even in dynamic games that require quick reactions. There is hardly anything to criticize here. Of course, as is often the case, the Dolby Vision mode in games seems a bit slower compared to classic SDR or HDR. This will mainly be noticeable for Xbox Series X/S console users, which are the only ones that support Dolby Vision Gaming. Fortunately, input lag still remains below 30 ms, so in practice, this is still an acceptable level even for more demanding gamers.

TCL C6KS performs very well here — the latency drops below 10 ms, which makes reactions in games instantaneous. This is an excellent result in this class and definitely good news for those playing dynamic titles.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

1.7/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Good
Poor
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
9ms
9ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

The U7Q communicates excellently with the computer. For gamers, this is great news – we have high refresh rates, low input lag, and G-SYNC support, so gaming from the PC is pure pleasure. But the U7Q also performs well in everyday tasks. If someone uses a computer for text, browsing the internet, or office work – there’s nothing to complain about. The television correctly handles chroma 4:4:4, so fonts look sharp and clear, without blurriness or strange contours. Both lowercase and uppercase letters are simply readable – just as they should be.

Besides the previously mentioned option of operating at 144 Hz at lower resolutions, the C6KS offers nothing that would encourage its use as a monitor. The fonts look really poor—the darkest ones have a distinct rainbow glow, and standard text is surrounded by strange artifacts. The effect is noticeable enough that extended work at the computer can be simply exhausting.

Viewing angles

3/10

2.7/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
74%
80%

The viewing angles on the U7Q are rather weak – this is simply a typical characteristic of VA panels. Straight on, everything looks very good: blacks are deep, colors are saturated, and the contrast is high. But just shifting slightly to the side causes the image to start losing quality – colors become washed out, and blacks begin to resemble dark gray. Compared to TVs with IPS panels, the U7Q performs worse, although on the other hand, it makes up for it with better contrast and deeper blacks.

The viewing angles in C6KS are very poor, typical of VA panels. This is a compromise we pay for by choosing high contrast — the image looks good head-on, but any significant deviation quickly results in drops in brightness and saturation.

Daytime performance

6.2/10

6.6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Good
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS: 527 cd/m2

Hisense U7Q: 519 cd/m2

The U7Q performs quite well in a sunlit room. The brightness in SDR mode averages around 520 nits, which in practice means that even on sunny days, it's comfortable to watch television—without the feeling that everything is drowning in our reflections. Additionally, thanks to the satin coating on the panel, the television does a good job of reducing reflections.

C6KS performs really well as a TV viewing screen during the day. Its brightness of around 500–600 nits easily cuts through challenging lighting conditions. In addition, there is a satin finish that effectively reduces reflections. As a result, the television surprisingly holds up well during daytime viewing, even in brighter rooms.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED PFS LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
V0000.09.01T.P0523
Image processor
RTD6748 2GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Hisense U7Q TV Panel details
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV Panel details

Hisense U7Q

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

TV features

8.9/10

7/10

  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    Yes
    No
  • Recording programming
    Yes
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Hisense U7Q TV features
Review Hisense U7Q TV features
Review Hisense U7Q TV features
Review Hisense U7Q TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features

Classic Features of U7Q

Hisense U7Q has a lot to offer when it comes to classic TV features. You can record programs to USB, easily connect external devices via Bluetooth, and the interface – such as EPG – is clear and readable. It may sound like something mainly appreciated by seniors, but the truth is that the U7Q has practically everything needed for watching traditional television. The only thing missing here is the PiP (picture-in-picture) feature.

Smart TV U7Q: Vidaa

When it comes to Smart features, the U7Q runs on the proprietary VIDAA system. And I must admit – it works really smoothly. Voice search in Polish? No issues. AirPlay and screen mirroring? They work without any problems as well. Of course, one must be aware that VIDAA is a closed system, so – as is often the case – some popular apps, especially those related to music, are missing. Therefore, before purchasing, it’s worth checking if all the apps you use daily are available.

The biggest advantage of the C6KS is the Google TV system. It is an environment that offers a lot—ideal for those who prioritize a wide selection of applications and convenient use of streaming services. AirPlay, screen sharing, and voice assistant features work very well here, making everyday use of the television simply convenient.

The support for traditional television is somewhat lacking. Users who expect extensive "TV" features may feel overlooked. Besides the efficiently working Bluetooth remote with a numeric keypad, we won't find conveniences like USB recording or PiP functionality here.

Apps

7.7/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8.2/10

8.9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
Yes
Yes
TIFF
Yes
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in player in the U7Q fully meets the needs of most future users. The television seamlessly supports Polish characters and most popular video, audio, and photo formats. If we had to nitpick, it would be only about the limited support for certain photo resolutions – there are occasions when files from the camera are not displayed correctly. It's worth keeping this in mind if you plan to present photos directly from a DSLR or phone.

The system player really delivers and smoothly handles popular formats. The only hiccup occurs with files from the Apple ecosystem (e.g., HEIC) – here, TCL simply gives up. Fortunately, a huge plus of Google TV is that you can install your own application, such as VLC. This way, you can quickly address the shortcomings of the factory player, allowing you to play practically any material, customizing the TV to your preferences.

Sound

7.2/10

6.5/10

  • Maximum volume
    82dB
    -
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

Sound is one of the major advantages of the U7Q. The TV sounds really pleasant – there is a slightly noticeable bass, good tone balance, and it is definitely something more than just for "everyday news watching." You can easily play music on it and just enjoy the sound – of course in an entertaining way, not an audiophile one 😉. It also deserves high praise for full support for the most important audio codecs, which worked flawlessly. A small exception is Dolby Atmos in TrueHD version, which did not fully play when connected to a home theater, so if someone uses this format – it's worth keeping in mind – it may be a software bug.

TCL C6KS performs almost identically to the C6K model, as it uses the same set of speakers branded by Onkyo. For a television of this class, the sound is quite good — you can even sense a slightly defined bass, which is not often found in budget segments. However, it is worth remembering the proper perspective. This bass performs decently against other televisions, but a home theater setup or even a basic soundbar will still offer a much fuller, more dynamic sound. Therefore, the C6KS is suitable for regular television watching, but if someone is keen on a stronger sound, additional audio equipment will be a natural choice.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

82dBC (Max)

75dBC

No acoustic data