Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a television that at first glance does not reveal significant changes compared to its predecessor. Someone might even think it is simply a copy of last year's model with a different label. And there is some truth to that, as the main new feature, or rather the only noticeable difference, is the 120 Hz mode at lower resolutions. Credit must be given to Xiaomi, as this addition really does make a difference – it is not a solution for professional gamers, but a nod towards those looking for a smoother image during casual gaming. This is where the A Pro 2026 can shine – with a simple yet clever idea that distinguishes it in the “super-budget” segment. Unfortunately, when we begin to look at the television more broadly, excitement quickly dwindles. Even though the year has changed on the calendar, most of the issues known from the A Pro 2025 have remained – the system can still experience strange stutters, and the occasional errors can be quite irritating. Additionally, there is a lack of any serious tools for digital image processing, which worked quite decently last year. As a result, there are many limitations in the design that the competition at a similar price point is already attempting to mask. In terms of picture quality, we will not deceive you either. A brightness level of 200–300 nits does not stand a chance against more demanding materials. Yes, with simpler streaming content, one can manage to watch something, but with high-budget productions, it is immediately evident why the television costs what it does. The impression of watching a flattened image stripped of details accompanies us almost every time. And here we get to the crux of the matter. The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a television for those who really require very little. As a daily screen for series, news, or YouTube – it works quite well, especially thanks to its operating system, which is GoogleTV. Also, if someone is looking for budget equipment and additionally would like a taste of smoother gameplay in games due to the 120 Hz mode, they may even be satisfied. But anyone expecting at least average picture quality, a stable system, and proper functionality will quickly notice that there are other budget models on the market that simply perform better.
Philips OLED811 is a mid-range OLED for 2026 that stands out from its biggest rivals mainly for one thing: Ambilight. The light that follows the picture and spreads across the wall can change the atmosphere of an entire viewing session. In the evening the screen seems to extend beyond its borders and watching simply gains extra charm. For some it will be a pleasant extra, for others a sufficient reason to choose Philips again. The picture itself is very comparable to what models such as the LG C6 or Samsung S90H offer when using the same type of panel. So you get deep, perfect blacks on which bright elements make a strong impression. The OLED811 can deliver powerful HDR and, importantly, after calibration the picture itself is close to the reference. There is no big advantage over the competition, but there is also no feeling that by choosing Philips for Ambilight you are sacrificing image quality.
There are also a few good changes for gamers compared with last year’s model. Thanks to the MediaTek Pentonic 800 chipset we finally have four HDMI 2.1 ports, so connecting several devices, for example consoles, a PC and a soundbar, no longer requires choosing which device will get the full capabilities of the port. Gaming itself is very enjoyable — the television responds quickly, supports variable refresh rates, and from a PC allows gaming in 4K at 165 Hz. It’s a pity that the new processor’s capabilities were not put to equally good use when processing lower-quality sources. The biggest concern, however, is the operating system. Titan OS replaced the popular Google TV and although it has clearly developed over the past year, it is still hard to call the change a positive one. The system runs more smoothly, has more useful features, and the app library already contains most popular streaming services. Nevertheless, the selection of apps is still much smaller than with Google or the competition, and in our view that remains the OLED811’s biggest drawback. People who use less popular services may particularly feel this difference.
Is it worth buying? Yes, if Titan OS meets your needs. In terms of picture and gaming capabilities the OLED811 has as much to offer as its rivals, but Ambilight gives it something others do not. So Philips both gives and takes. It adds a unique viewing atmosphere but limits freedom of app choice. If the apps you use are available, that compromise may be worth making.