XIAOMI A PRO 2026 vs Philips OLED811

Direct comparison

OLED801 / OLED811

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 48”55”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.6

8.1

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.0

    8.5

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.7

    8.7

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.7

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    6.2

    8.9

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    4.9

    6.0

  • Utility functions

    6.1

    7.9

  • Apps

    9.6

    7.7

  • Sound quality

    5.0

    7.6

Advantages

  • VA matrix with good native contrast and decent blacks

  • Support for Game Boost mode at 120 Hz in 1080p and 1440p

  • Low input lag in 120 Hz mode

  • Google TV – a vast selection of apps and services

  • Wide colour gamut coverage (approx. 94% DCI-P3)

  • Decent colours after SDR mode calibration

  • Support for popular audio formats (Dolby Atmos, DTS:X)

  • Large, clear remote with a numeric keypad – convenient for seniors

  • Three-sided Ambilight that creates a great atmosphere for viewing

  • Perfect blacks and excellent contrast from the OLED panel

  • Powerful HDR effect. Brightness around 1500 nits

  • Very good viewing angles

  • Excellent motion clarity (no smearing)

  • Supports 4K at 165 Hz

  • Four HDMI 2.1 ports

  • Extensive gaming features

  • Support for multiple audio/video formats: (Dolby Vision, Dolby Atmos, HDR10+, DTS)

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness

  • No real support for HDR10+ and other more advanced HDR formats (e.g. Dolby Vision)

  • Significant limitations when working with PC – lack of chroma 4:4:4, strong dithering, poor font readability

  • Poor viewing angles (typical for VA)

  • Clunky construction, legs mounted in plastic with screws

  • Weird system issues – stuttering, errors with Miracast and sound switching

  • Upscaling and digital image processing are practically non-existent

  • Very weak sound, virtually no bass (we felt it performed worse than the "2025" model)

  • Smaller app library on Titan OS than on Google TV or most competitors

  • Infrared remote that needs to be pointed at the TV (sometimes responds slowly)

  • Very high input lag in games with Dolby Vision

  • Visible posterization (mainly in bright scenes)

  • Underused image-processing capabilities of the Pentonic 800

Our verdict

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a television that at first glance does not reveal significant changes compared to its predecessor. Someone might even think it is simply a copy of last year's model with a different label. And there is some truth to that, as the main new feature, or rather the only noticeable difference, is the 120 Hz mode at lower resolutions. Credit must be given to Xiaomi, as this addition really does make a difference – it is not a solution for professional gamers, but a nod towards those looking for a smoother image during casual gaming. This is where the A Pro 2026 can shine – with a simple yet clever idea that distinguishes it in the “super-budget” segment. Unfortunately, when we begin to look at the television more broadly, excitement quickly dwindles. Even though the year has changed on the calendar, most of the issues known from the A Pro 2025 have remained – the system can still experience strange stutters, and the occasional errors can be quite irritating. Additionally, there is a lack of any serious tools for digital image processing, which worked quite decently last year. As a result, there are many limitations in the design that the competition at a similar price point is already attempting to mask. In terms of picture quality, we will not deceive you either. A brightness level of 200–300 nits does not stand a chance against more demanding materials. Yes, with simpler streaming content, one can manage to watch something, but with high-budget productions, it is immediately evident why the television costs what it does. The impression of watching a flattened image stripped of details accompanies us almost every time. And here we get to the crux of the matter. The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a television for those who really require very little. As a daily screen for series, news, or YouTube – it works quite well, especially thanks to its operating system, which is GoogleTV. Also, if someone is looking for budget equipment and additionally would like a taste of smoother gameplay in games due to the 120 Hz mode, they may even be satisfied. But anyone expecting at least average picture quality, a stable system, and proper functionality will quickly notice that there are other budget models on the market that simply perform better.

Philips OLED811 is a mid-range OLED for 2026 that stands out from its biggest rivals mainly for one thing: Ambilight. The light that follows the picture and spreads across the wall can change the atmosphere of an entire viewing session. In the evening the screen seems to extend beyond its borders and watching simply gains extra charm. For some it will be a pleasant extra, for others a sufficient reason to choose Philips again. The picture itself is very comparable to what models such as the LG C6 or Samsung S90H offer when using the same type of panel. So you get deep, perfect blacks on which bright elements make a strong impression. The OLED811 can deliver powerful HDR and, importantly, after calibration the picture itself is close to the reference. There is no big advantage over the competition, but there is also no feeling that by choosing Philips for Ambilight you are sacrificing image quality.

There are also a few good changes for gamers compared with last year’s model. Thanks to the MediaTek Pentonic 800 chipset we finally have four HDMI 2.1 ports, so connecting several devices, for example consoles, a PC and a soundbar, no longer requires choosing which device will get the full capabilities of the port. Gaming itself is very enjoyable — the television responds quickly, supports variable refresh rates, and from a PC allows gaming in 4K at 165 Hz. It’s a pity that the new processor’s capabilities were not put to equally good use when processing lower-quality sources. The biggest concern, however, is the operating system. Titan OS replaced the popular Google TV and although it has clearly developed over the past year, it is still hard to call the change a positive one. The system runs more smoothly, has more useful features, and the app library already contains most popular streaming services. Nevertheless, the selection of apps is still much smaller than with Google or the competition, and in our view that remains the OLED811’s biggest drawback. People who use less popular services may particularly feel this difference.

Is it worth buying? Yes, if Titan OS meets your needs. In terms of picture and gaming capabilities the OLED811 has as much to offer as its rivals, but Ambilight gives it something others do not. So Philips both gives and takes. It adds a unique viewing atmosphere but limits freedom of app choice. If the apps you use are available, that compromise may be worth making.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Budget
Good
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Black
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Swivel
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

6.1/10

10/10

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,000:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,550:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

7,300:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,600:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,900:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

One of the biggest advantages of even a budget model like the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is the use of a VA panel. It is responsible for quite a decent contrast, which in our measurements oscillated around 5000:1 – 7000:1. On the screen, this translates to a stable image with a fairly deep black – something that is difficult to find in competitive models with an IPS panel without local dimming. Xiaomi has also added a feature for global dimming of the entire panel. It sounds good, but… we advise you to turn it off immediately. Why? Because the screen begins to behave very strangely in darker scenes – sometimes it dims so much that practically nothing is visible, while at other times it brightens so much that the already dark blue black turns into a bright blue. At that moment, we felt as if the television was simply damaged. Fortunately, without this feature, the contrast looks really solid. It is definitely not on the level of advanced televisions with local dimming, but in its price range, it will comfortably satisfy most users – especially if you are not watching in a completely dark room, but have at least a little light in the background, which effectively masks the imperfections of the "blue black".

Black and contrast are categories where the Philips OLED811 showcases all the benefits of OLED technology. Each pixel lights independently and can be switched off completely, so black is simply black. There’s no grey glow or haloing around bright objects. During evening viewings this produces a great effect: stars in the night sky, city lights and text on dark backgrounds remain clearly separated from a perfectly black surround.

It’s therefore hard to expect any improvement here over other OLEDs, because in terms of black depth and contrast the result is already exemplary. The OLED811 doesn’t need local dimming or a compromise between the brightness of a small object and the black around it. Even a single bright point can sit next to a completely switched-off pixel, giving the image outstanding depth.

It’s in scenes with extensive black that the advantage over Mini LED TVs becomes clear. Even the most sophisticated local-dimming systems control larger areas of the image, so in demanding shots they can create a glow around bright elements or dim them to preserve a dark background. The Philips OLED811 doesn’t suffer from this problem.

HDR effect quality

4.1/10

7.6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 93.6%, Bt.2020: 71.7%
DCI P3: 99.0%, Bt.2020: 74.5%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

220 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

248 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

322 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

315 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

326 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1225 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1310 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1443 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1368 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

626 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips OLED811

XIAOMI A PRO 2026

Luminance of RGB colors

If you are hoping for a cinema-grade HDR effect in the new Xiaomi A Pro 2026, you better cool your expectations quickly. This television is simply too dim to fully showcase the capabilities of contemporary films or series designed for the highest image quality. Our measurements showed brightness in the range of 200–300 nits, which is more akin to SDR content than ambitious HDR productions. In practice, this means that while most films may look fine, they certainly won't evoke that "wow" effect that other televisions are known for. Fortunately, not everything is lost – we must credit the PFS LED filter used here, which is a solution similar to the quantum dot technology found in QLEDs. Thanks to this, the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour palette reaches about 94%, resulting in vibrant, saturated colours in the vast majority of materials.

Philips OLED811 uses a new generation of WOLED EX panels, also found in models such as the LG C6 and Samsung S90H. After calibration we measured around 1500 nits, which is a very good result for an OLED TV. You can see this clearly in films and series. All kinds of bright flashes have the right intensity, especially when they appear against a dark background. In such scenes the OLED811 can deliver truly impressive HDR. Of course, that does not mean you will see that level of brightness in every shot. When the screen is filled with a large amount of white or a wide explosion, brightness falls to around 600 nits. That is still a good result, but those scenes no longer have the same punch as small, bright elements on a dark background. This is a known limitation of OLEDs and the OLED811 is no exception.

Colours

Aside from HDR brightness, colours also matter and here Philips performs very well. It covers almost the entire DCI-P3 gamut, which contains most of the colours used in HDR films and series. You get saturated reds and lush greens, and when watching it’s hard to find major faults in that respect. It looks a little worse with the much wider BT.2020 gamut, whose most saturated shades are already out of reach for this panel. There is also the issue of the white subpixel that the WOLED panel uses to boost brightness. With very bright colours you can see a certain washout: the colour is bright but loses some of its intensity. It is precisely in such situations that QD-OLED panels from Samsung Display have the advantage. However, in most films and series this is not something that will immediately stand out.

Factory color reproduction

3.5/10

7.8/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

What we saw in Filmmaker mode took us by surprise – and unfortunately not in a good way. The mode advertised as Hollywood standard resembled more of a shop window display. The white balance was shifted towards blue, leading to significant colour mistakes and burnt-out scenes in SDR content. It was slightly better, though still not perfect, in HDR materials. There were also issues there – the colour saturation and the entire palette consistently drifted towards cooler tones, resulting in an image that had more of an artificial, cold tint instead of a cinematic character. In other words: even in Filmmaker mode, which should showcase this television, we got an effect far from expectations.

Film mode on the Philips OLED811 is sensibly set up straight out of the box. Most colour errors remain small, both in SDR and HDR, so you can sit down to watch without adjusting the settings first. There are no major inaccuracies that would immediately distract from the film. It falls a little short of perfection, though. The white balance shows a slight lack of red compared with green, so whites and greys can have a faint greenish tint. It is not a strong colour cast, but measurements clearly show it. There are also minor brightness deviations in SDR: some parts of the image are slightly brightened, and the darkest shades are not always reproduced evenly. In HDR the TV sticks much closer to the reference, although in places it gently lifts detail from the shadows. These are generally areas that could be improved. The factory film mode provides a good starting point, and calibration will reveal how much more can be gained from it.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

9.3/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Although Xiaomi is not a brand associated with top-tier televisions, it must be acknowledged that even in a budget model like the A Pro 2026, the manufacturer left plenty of calibration settings. After a few adjustments, the SDR image gained a completely new look. Colours stopped drifting towards blue tones, whites took on a more natural quality, and most errors dropped to a practically invisible level. As a result, SDR content looked very good, surprisingly so for this price range.

It was somewhat different with HDR materials. Here, it was immediately evident what we had already mentioned – clipping in bright scenes and issues with balance control. Calibration helped only partly, as the limitations of the panel itself played a role. However, it must be emphasized that for SDR, the television had transformed beyond recognition and in a decidedly positive direction.

After calibration the Philips OLED811 produces an image very close to the reference. We managed to correct the white balance and eliminate the slight tint visible in the factory settings. Errors in the Color Checker measurements for SDR and HDR fell to around 1 to 2, and many samples are even below 1. That's a level at which differences from the reference image are hard to spot with the naked eye. We also improved the gamma, and only in the brightest whites is there a slight brightening remaining. In HDR the EOTF curve also tracks the reference closely, although the TV still tends to gently boost the brightness of small elements, such as stars or on-screen text. This gives the picture a little extra sparkle that shouldn't be there, but otherwise there's little to fault. It was already good out of the box, and after calibration we managed to refine most of the remaining shortcomings.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.3/10

7.5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The television really handles colour blending well, and in most scenes, it's difficult to spot any imperfections. This is most evident in the bright segments of films, where tonal transitions look almost perfect; the image is then smooth and natural. Darker scenes present slightly worse, where characteristic banding can be noticed. Fortunately, this is not a flaw that stands out prominently, and for most viewers, it will remain practically unnoticed.

Compared with Philips' previous OLEDs the smoothness of tonal transitions has clearly improved. The biggest difference is visible in dark parts of the picture, which can cause WOLED panels a lot of trouble. On the OLED811 they have been smoothed very well, with tones transitioning smoothly from one to another without visible banding or contouring. That's a big plus, especially when viewing dark scenes.

Unfortunately, it's not as good in brighter scenes. That's where we have the biggest reservations: instead of a gentle transition between tones, in places you can see distinct boundaries, known as posterisation. It can be quite noticeable, and it's a shame that the improvement seen in dark scenes did not extend to the brighter parts of the image to a similar degree.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

3/10

6.8/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
No
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Upscaling and digital image processing in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 are not among the strengths of this model. One might expect that since the television was not designed to achieve record brightness levels, the manufacturer would focus on a more robust processor and a set of features that would "enhance" lower-quality images. Unfortunately – and here we are also faced with significant disappointment. On the positive side, we can note reasonably good upscaling, which handles HD materials and boosts them up to 4K in an acceptable manner. However, this is where the list of advantages ends. The television does not offer any features that improve tonal transitions or smooth out digital imperfections, so in most cases, we get a raw image, exactly as we deliver from an external source. On a large screen, such a lack of support makes lower-quality materials simply look bland. An additional problem is the phenomenon of overscan. When watching older materials, it happens that part of the image gets cut off, which only amplifies the impression that Xiaomi still has a lot of ground to make up in this category.

OLED811 handles lower-quality material reasonably well, though it falls well short of perfection. The "Banding reduction" function helps to smooth tonal transitions and on the low setting gives a fairly good result. It does not remove bands between shades as effectively as similar solutions from some competitors, but at least it does not introduce new artefacts in the process. This is a sensible setting for everyday viewing. There is still some dissatisfaction, however, because the MediaTek Pentonic 800 chipset used here can, in other manufacturers' implementations, cope with the effects of heavy compression more effectively even at similarly low settings. Much therefore depends on how a given manufacturer makes use of its capabilities. We have a few more comments about the upscaling to 4K. There is a lot of detail, but the overall image looks rather soft. Edges are heavily smoothed, which robs the picture of a bit of sharpness and clarity. This can be partly corrected with the sharpness slider in the menu, though that will merely accentuate outlines rather than recover detail. On the plus side, there is no overscan; even with an SD signal the TV does not crop the edges of the picture.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.5/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
165Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (1440p@120Hz):

Blur (4K@165Hz ):

The fluidity of motion in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is an interesting compromise that arises from the hybrid matrix used here. At its native 4K resolution, the maximum refresh rate is 60 Hz – sufficient for those who mainly watch films and series. It is precisely with them in mind that the manufacturer has added a motion smoother, allowing users to adjust the image to their own preferences – opting for greater fluidity or leaving more "cinematic" frames depending on the settings.

In terms of motion handling the OLED811 performs excellently. At 120 Hz, which is useful for console gaming and watching sport, the picture stays clear and moving objects do not leave noticeable smears. The fast response of OLED pixels helps here; this is clear in the UFO test, even on dark backgrounds. There are also motion smoothing controls. For films you can adjust the level of smoothing to suit your taste, ranging from preserving a cinematic character to much smoother motion. A separate blur reduction setting is useful for fast-paced material such as sports broadcasts.

Console compatibility and gaming features

3.6/10

9.5/10

  • ALLM
    No
    Yes
  • VRR
    No
    Yes
  • VRR range
    No
    48 - 165Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Warning Yes, high input lag
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Exactly – since Xiaomi has included the "Game Boost 120 Hz" feature, one might expect that they would follow up with a solid gaming package. Unfortunately, reality quickly dampens this enthusiasm. Aside from this mode (which, it must be admitted, is a great addition in a budget design), we only have a rather odd player panel. It's hard to call it a full-fledged "game bar" – it’s more of a simple overlay on the TV Menu with limited capabilities. And that would be about it. There’s a lack of ALLM, so the TV won’t automatically switch to game mode. There’s no VRR, so you can forget about smooth frame sync. We also won’t find support for Dolby Vision in games or the HGiG format, which are becoming increasingly standard on consoles. In short: besides the Game Boost 120 Hz, which actually allows for a more enjoyable experience at 1080p or 1440p, the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 offers nothing that could particularly attract gamers.

OLED811 has almost everything you could expect from a TV for gaming. It supports 120 Hz at Full HD, 1440p and 4K, and when connected to a PC it can reach 165 Hz. It also has VRR, which helps prevent screen tearing when frame rates fluctuate, and ALLM, which automatically switches to game mode. So you don't have to dig into the settings every time you power up your console.

Another plus is that HGiG works correctly, so once HDR is set on the console the TV doesn't apply its own changes to image brightness. There's also a Game Bar to check signal parameters and quickly change settings useful while gaming. The list even includes Dolby Vision for gaming, but there is a significant catch, which you can read about below.

Input lag

9.5/10

8.8/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
14 ms
1080p120
8 ms
5 ms
2160p60
25 ms
14 ms
2160p120
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
25 ms
14 ms
2160p120
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
157 ms
2160p120 DV
57 ms

The input lag on the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is quite decent and definitely not its weak point. The best results were achieved in 1080p@120 Hz and 1440p@120 Hz modes – in those, the television goes below 10 ms, which can easily be described as an outstanding result, and more than sufficient even for the more demanding gamers. The situation changes with 60 Hz content – the input lag then rises to around 25 ms. While these may not be the best figures on the market, they are perfectly acceptable for casual gaming or firing up a console in the evening. Especially since in most cases, it's still worthwhile to enable the 120 Hz mode, which is the most advantageous for gamers.

The OLED811 responds instantly. We measured 14 ms at 60 Hz and just 5 ms at 120 Hz, both in Full HD and 4K. Those are excellent results that let you comfortably play even fast online titles. Unfortunately, when Dolby Vision is enabled the situation changes dramatically: at 60 Hz latency rises to 157 ms, and at 120 Hz it is 57 ms. The first figure in particular already means a clearly noticeable delay between input on the controller and the on-screen response. For gaming, it’s definitely better to stick with HDR10.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
No
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
25ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGWB
Max refresh rate
60Hz
165Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 as a computer monitor? There's no point beating around the bush – it's very bad. While the 120 Hz mode can still be used in games at lower resolutions, for daily work the television is completely unsuitable. There's a lack of full support for chroma 4:4:4, meaning fonts are blurred and sometimes even rainbow-like. Additionally, there's significant dithering, causing the image to appear uneven – some pixels shine brighter, others dimmer, and vertical lines can even break apart. In practice, this means that text (especially coloured and on a dark background) becomes hard to read. Light text manages to hold up somewhat, but it’s hard to talk about any comfort here. In this category, we give the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 a score of 2/10 (+1 for the additional high refresh rate mode), and there’s really no point in dwelling on this further.

The Philips OLED811 works very well with a PC. The manufacturer has finally managed to implement 4:4:4 chroma correctly, even at maximum resolution and refresh rate. As a result, small text and coloured edges are legible, without blurring or rainbow artefacts caused by loss of colour information. Dark text on dark backgrounds also performs well, which is something TVs can struggle with. There are still minor imperfections related to the RGWB subpixel layout. Fonts are not as sharp as on a conventional RGB monitor, and white letters can show faint red outlines up close. From a normal viewing distance you hardly notice it, though sitting close to the screen at a desk makes it easier to spot.

The most fun, however, comes from gaming on a PC. The combination of 4K at 165 Hz, functional G-Sync and input lag of around 5 ms makes the OLED811 excellent for that. If you have a PC that can take advantage of such a refresh rate, it’s definitely worth connecting it to the Philips.

Viewing angles

3/10

7.8/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
63%
32%

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 uses a VA panel, which immediately suggests that viewing angles are not its strong suit. When looking at the screen from the side, we quickly notice a loss of quality – colours noticeably fade, and the whole image appears washed out. The drop in brightness may not be as drastic as in some constructions based on similar technology, but that does not change the fact that this is clearly a weak point of this model. If we plan to use it as a large, cheap screen for the living room, we need to reckon with this limitation.

The viewing angles on the OLED811 are excellent and among the best on the market. Even sitting well off to the side, you still see an image with deep blacks and well-saturated colours. This is a big advantage over LCD screens, as you don't have to sit directly in front to enjoy good picture quality.

QD-OLED panels do even better, keeping colours truer at angles. On the Philips, at greater off‑axis angles white shifts slightly towards greenish hues, but the effect is so small that it is hard to find it bothersome during viewing. We'd even say that, in this respect, we've come across the best WOLED panel unit we've tested so far.

Daytime performance

4.9/10

6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Glare
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

Philips OLED811: 392 cd/m2

XIAOMI A PRO 2026: 334 cd/m2

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 performs quite well during the day. The display has a satin coating that manages to dull reflections somewhat, so the colours do not lose their vibrancy, even when the room is bright. Just remember that it is not an extremely bright screen – the average brightness is around 350 nits. In a typical, moderately sunlit living room, it is sufficient, but if you have large windows and plenty of sunshine coming in, it might simply be difficult without blinds or curtains.

OLED811 copes with daytime viewing, though in a very bright living room it has its limitations. Maximum SDR brightness reaches around 600 nits, comparable to the LG C6 or the Samsung S90H, which use the same panel. That’s noticeably more than entry-level OLEDs and will be more than enough for most people. However, bear in mind this brightness is not sustained across the whole screen; it falls with large areas of white, and our average measurement was about 392 nits.

A bigger problem can be direct reflections from windows or lamps. The glossy coating suppresses them reasonably well, but they are still clearly visible on the screen, especially in dark scenes. It doesn’t diffuse them as effectively as matte screens, so placing the TV opposite a large window is not the best idea. On the plus side, blacks remain very good even during the day. In a typical living room the Philips will cope without major issues, but with strong sunlight falling directly on the screen you will want blinds.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
WRGB OLED
Software version during testing
UKN1.240806.017.V816.0.25.5.13.621.4.URTMIXM
TPM267E_V167.002.054.151
Image processor
4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1530 MHz

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV Panel details
Review Philips OLED811 TV Panel details

XIAOMI A PRO 2026

Philips OLED811

TV features

6.1/10

7.9/10

  • System
    Google TV
    Titan OS
  • System performance
    Poor
    Good
  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    Yes
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

SmartTV - Google TV

The biggest advantage of the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is the Google TV system. It is what gives the television a second life – you can run practically any application on it, from Netflix and YouTube to music services and lesser-known programmes from the Google Play Store. We are not limited to what the manufacturer has pre-installed, as is the case with other budget televisions. Additionally, we have AirPlay, voice search via Google Assistant, and even integration with Gemini. We did encounter a few minor hiccups – for example, streaming from a laptop did not always want to work – but despite these shortcomings, Google TV is a huge plus in this setup.

Classic TV Functions

The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 can be termed a 'senior-friendly' television. The large remote control with a numerical keypad and a considerable number of physical buttons makes it intuitive to operate. Support for teletext and a clear EPG interface facilitate the use of classic television functions. We will not find many advanced features such as USB recording or the PiP function, but the presence of an analogue headphone jack output can be surprisingly practical for some users. It gives the impression of a set of features tailored to the needs of the most traditional viewers.

System Stability

However, not everything works as it should. During testing, we encountered irritating system lags, problems with Miracast, and issues when switching audio sources. There were even instances where it was necessary to reset the television by disconnecting it from the power supply. This simply shows that although Google TV offers huge possibilities, the stability in such a budget-friendly construct can still be quite problematic.

Smart features: Titan OS

It's the Smart TV system that is the most controversial change in the OLED811. Philips dropped the user-favorite Google TV in favor of its own Titan OS. For many people this may be hard to accept, although Titan has been getting better every year and runs noticeably smoother. We have working AirPlay, screen mirroring from a computer, and voice search in Polish. System responsiveness has improved too, though minor delays still occur when navigating menus. We suspect the infrared remote is partly to blame, as it doesn't always register commands immediately. The biggest limitation compared with Google TV remains a smaller app selection. That doesn't mean it's empty — you'll find Netflix, Prime Video, Disney+, CANAL+, and Apple TV was recently added to the library. If you mainly use popular services, Titan should be enough, but it's worth checking availability of lesser-known apps before buying (list at the bottom 😉).

Ambilight

Ambilight is still one of the best reasons to consider a Philips. On the OLED811 it's three-sided — LEDs at the top and along the sides of the chassis light the wall with colors matched to what's happening on screen. In the evening it creates a great effect and can change the mood of the whole room, which is why we awarded extra points for this feature. You don't have to use dynamic picture tracking though. If you prefer calmer viewing conditions, you can set a steady white light. That's a nice option for evening sessions when you don't want to sit in front of a bright screen in a completely dark room.

Classic features

For regular TV watching the OLED811 performs well, although there is no USB recording or picture-in-picture (PiP). You can connect Bluetooth headphones and use them at the same time as the TV speakers. What bothers us most is the aforementioned infrared control. The remote itself is really interestingly designed: it has backlighting and a hybrid keyboard with a numeric section. It's a shame you have to aim it at the TV like with old remotes. For equipment at this level we'd prefer to just press buttons without wondering which way we're holding the remote. Hopefully Philips will fix that in future models.

Apps

9.6/10

7.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

6.8/10

8.6/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
No
6 Mpix
Yes
No
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a real enigma. On one hand, it plays most popular audio and video formats without major issues. On the other hand, it can struggle with basic things like Polish characters. Files with letters such as ą, ł, ć or ś in their names often refuse to open or are displayed incorrectly. This looks strange, as we seemingly have codec support, yet the television simply gets lost on simple matters related to the alphabet. Fortunately, this is not a huge problem, as thanks to Google TV we can simply install another player, e.g. VLC. Then the issue with Polish characters disappears completely, and using multimedia becomes hassle-free.

The USB player in the OLED811 handles most of the audio and video formats we test, so it's perfectly adequate for watching a film or playing music from a USB stick. However, our main reservations are about photos, specifically its oddly selective handling of their resolutions. The TV opened 8, 16 and 32MP files but couldn't cope with the rest. It's not that the photos are simply too large. The player can display a higher-resolution image yet refuse to open a smaller one. When browsing holiday snaps this can be simply irritating, because some of them will need to be converted on a computer first... or you could just mirror your screen remotely...😉

Sound

5/10

7.6/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    93dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

Last year, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 surprised us with really decent sound, considering it is a super budget television. Unfortunately, this year's edition – the A Pro 2026, has let us down across the board. The sound resembles the sensation of the equipment playing from underwater: flat, devoid of any bass or depth. The only upside remains the wide support for audio formats, such as Dolby Atmos or DTS:X, but in practice, it changes very little. If you are considering this television, you must immediately factor in a soundbar, as without it the audio experience will be quite disappointing.

There have been a few concrete changes to the audio compared with last year’s OLED820. The rear subwoofer is gone, and the 4.1 speaker layout has been replaced by a 2.2 configuration. Despite these changes, the OLED811 still sounds good and fairly balanced. It can play louder, and the sound even seems a little fuller than a year ago. However, the bass has suffered. Although the sound has some weight, the low end lacks the depth of its predecessor. It’s easiest to hear this in films and music, when you’re waiting for a bigger punch. Still, this is well above average for built‑in TV speakers. If you want deeper bass and clearer spatial effects, it’s worth considering a soundbar or a system with an AV receiver. Philips gives plenty of freedom here: it supports both Dolby Atmos and DTS, and can pass Dolby TrueHD tracks over HDMI eARC to compatible equipment. So there are options if we decide to expand the audio setup in future.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

93dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy