SAMSUNG S95F (TANDEM OLED 83") vs TCL X11L

Direct comparison

S95F / FAT / FAE

Info

Available screen sizes: 83”

Available screen sizes: 75”85”98”

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

8.7

8.6

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    9.0

    8.5

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    9.0

    7.9

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    8.6

    7.3

  • Gaming on console

    9.8

    9.1

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.8

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    7.7

    10.0

  • Utility functions

    7.9

    8.3

  • Apps

    9.3

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    8.0

    8.2

Advantages

  • Perfect black and excellent contrast

  • High image brightness

  • Amazing image quality after calibration

  • Ultra-fast WOLED 165 Hz panel

  • Great choice for gamers – full support for HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, and HGiG, with an input lag of just 5 ms

  • Very accurate colour reproduction after calibration

  • Best reflection suppression thanks to the matte screen finish and better performance of the panel in challenging lighting conditions compared to the version with a QD-OLED panel

  • Intuitive and speedy Tizen operating system with a rich set of features

  • Modern and elegant design

  • One Connect module for easy aesthetic cable management

  • Best blacks on the market in a MINI-LED screen

  • Extremely high HDR and SDR brightness

  • Excellent colour saturation thanks to the SQD (Super QLED) filter

  • Very good image processing (MediaTek Pentonic 800)

  • A host of features for gamers: 4x HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, refresh rate up to 288Hz (PC)

  • Good motion handling

  • Open operating system: Google TV

  • Stunning design and build quality

  • Backlit metal remote

  • Built-in audio system tuned by Bang & Olufsen

Disadvantages

No like
  • No support for DTS:X (home cinema)

  • No USB recording from built-in tuners

  • Worse viewing angles (although still very good) than in the version with QD-OLED panel

  • Artificial brightening of the image: the TV brightens the entire HDR image by itself

  • Glossy panel poorly suppresses reflections

  • Lack of "television" features, e.g. USB recording (PVR), PiP

  • High price

Our verdict

In the case of the 83-inch version, Samsung took a different route than with the smaller sizes and opted for the Tandem WOLED panel produced by LG Display. This move initially raised questions, but in practice, it turned out to be a home run. Here we have an exceptionally successful mix: absolutely reference black levels, outstanding brightness that allows enjoyment of HDR content even during the day, as well as overall picture quality that firmly places this television among the very best on the market. There are also advantages aimed at gamers – lightning-fast input lag, 165 Hz refresh rate, full support for VRR and G-Sync/Freesync, and four HDMI 2.1 ports that let you connect several consoles or PCs without any compromises. To the list of positives, we must also add the matte coating – rarely found in OLEDs, and in this case, exceptionally effective. Thanks to it, light reflections are largely eliminated, and the television remains readable and comfortable to view even in a sunlit living room. This feature becomes even more significant in such a large size, as it is hard to imagine an 83-inch screen on which instead of a movie we see a reflection of our own room. Of course, there were some compromises – the viewing angles on the WOLED panel are not as perfect as in QD-OLED versions. However, in return, we get better performance in challenging lighting conditions and a more stable image under strong light hitting the screen. In practice, it is hard to consider this a real downside, rather as a different distribution of emphasis compared to smaller variants. The S95F in the 83-inch version is an almost explosive mix: a gigantic OLED with a matte finish, excellent brightness, fantastic black levels, and a comprehensive suite of features for gamers. If someone dreams of a huge, matte screen that isn’t afraid of daylight, they will not find a better screen on the market at this moment.

TCL X11L is, without a doubt, a powerful showcase of the manufacturer's capabilities and a TV that impresses in many areas. It’s clear the engineers focused on what matters most: maximum brightness, blacks and contrast. The new quantum dots with an SQD filter do such a job that colour saturation is hardly any different from the top new RGB panels. And what about the blacks? The X11L can easily be placed alongside an OLED and doesn't lose that fight by much, which is a real feat in the world of Mini-LEDs. On top of that there’s a whole host of features surrounding the screen. The new MediaTek Pentonic 800 processor has completely eliminated TCL’s old issues; image processing, upscaling and the smoothness of tonal transitions finally look as good as the competition from Korea or Japan. There is nothing to be ashamed of anymore. Gamers will be delighted too: four full HDMI 2.1 ports, refresh rates up to 288 Hz, a console-inspired Game Bar and Dolby Vision with no noticeable input lag. All of this is tied together by a very smooth Google TV system. Sounds like a recipe for the best Mini-LED of 2026, right? It would be perfect if not for one irritating quirk that stems directly from TCL’s stubborn image-tuning “philosophy”. This TV can simply ignore the director’s intent and, in HDR formats, arbitrarily and artificially brighten entire scenes. The effect? The picture can be too bright at times, sometimes even blown-out. The worst part is that the software offers no option to fix it; even during professional calibration we couldn’t fully correct this fault. For a screen at this price that aspires to be “the best of the best”, such wilfulness is simply unacceptable, especially when we’re talking about Filmmaker mode.

Still, if you couldn’t care less about perfect, studio-accurate fidelity and are after a picture that is above all maximally spectacular, showy and very bright in daylight, the X11L is a true beast. It’s the first Mini-LED to come so close to OLED black levels, and in brightness it simply crushes it. The only real brake here is the price. The sum you’ll have to pay for this model (regardless of size) is a serious outlay. Is it worth spending that much? We’ll leave that to your judgement. One thing must be conceded: it’s currently one of the best Mini-LEDs we’ve tested so far.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (40Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Super Premium
Super Premium
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Height adjustment
Flat design
Yes
Yes
Accessories
Stand, One Connect Box
Stand

Contrast and black detail

10/10

9.1/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 11520 (80 x 144)

Contrast:

Review SAMSUNG S95F (TANDEM OLED 83") Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG S95F (TANDEM OLED 83") Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG S95F (TANDEM OLED 83") Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG S95F (TANDEM OLED 83") Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG S95F (TANDEM OLED 83") Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review TCL X11L Contrast and black detail

Result

1,842,100:1

Review TCL X11L Contrast and black detail

Result

942,400:1

Review TCL X11L Contrast and black detail

Result

93,700:1

Review TCL X11L Contrast and black detail

Result

91,450:1

Review TCL X11L Contrast and black detail

Result

27,550:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The 83-inch version, equipped with a Tandem OLED panel, also offers a picture that makes a stunning impression. Despite the different technology, the final effect remains at an absolutely top level. The black is deep and uniform, without any transparency or imperfections, and the contrast is truly breathtaking. In dark scenes, every detail remains visible, and the separation of lights is perfect – nothing blends together, and the image looks exactly as it should on a reference-class television. This is proof that regardless of the panel used, Samsung has set the bar very high in this series.

Black and contrast on the X11L are simply S E N S A T I O N A L. The main credit goes to the astronomical number of local dimming zones combined with the proprietary WHVA 2.0 panel (VA-type). In the 75-inch model we tested we counted exactly 11,520 of them. Yes, you read that correctly, over 11 thousand local dimming zones in a Mini-LED screen! This translated into outstanding results in our tests: most scenes, especially the less complex ones, had blacks that were indistinguishable from those known from OLEDs. Even with the lights completely off, when the screen displayed deep, almost pitch-black parts of the image, it could be mistaken for an OLED panel. It’s currently the best Mini-LED if you care about the deepest blacks.

However, remember this is still an LCD TV. Even with such an astronomical number of zones, very complex sequences with lots of small elements on a black background (like a starfield or our demanding test pattern (no. 5) from the Pioneer Kuro) can reveal some halo effects, a faint glow around bright objects. Undoubtedly, though, this is far less noticeable than on other screens of this type we’ve tested so far. The algorithm handles it very well.

Naturally, the number of zones increases with screen diagonal. Below you can see the number of zones for each size:

X11L screen size

Number of local dimming zones

75"

11,520 zones

85"

14,400 zones

98"

20,736 zones

HDR effect quality

8.6/10

9.2/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 98.3%, Bt.2020: 75.6%
DCI P3: 97.9%, Bt.2020: 89.5%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review SAMSUNG S95F (TANDEM OLED 83") Brightness measurement

Result

2074 nit

Review SAMSUNG S95F (TANDEM OLED 83") Brightness measurement

Result

2107 nit

Review SAMSUNG S95F (TANDEM OLED 83") Brightness measurement

Result

2330 nit

Review SAMSUNG S95F (TANDEM OLED 83") Brightness measurement

Result

2165 nit

Review SAMSUNG S95F (TANDEM OLED 83") Brightness measurement

Result

1083 nit

Review TCL X11L Brightness measurement

Result

2934 nit

Review TCL X11L Brightness measurement

Result

2105 nit

Review TCL X11L Brightness measurement

Result

2809 nit

Review TCL X11L Brightness measurement

Result

1782 nit

Review TCL X11L Brightness measurement

Result

2841 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

TCL X11L

SAMSUNG S95F (TANDEM OLED 83")

Luminance of RGB colors

The Samsung S95F in the 83-inch variant with a Tandem OLED panel also manages to enchant with HDR effects. In test film scenes, such as "Life of Pi" or "Sicario 2", where smaller light points dominate – stars in the night sky, the glow of the moon or headlights – the television effortlessly achieves brightness values exceeding 2000 nits. This is a result that not long ago seemed unattainable for OLEDs and positions this model alongside the best Mini-LED constructions.

The limitations of organic panels only reveal themselves in full-screen scenes filled entirely with white. In the case of this model, for instance in the final scene from the film The Meg, brightness drops to around 1000 nits – a bit lower than in the smaller QD-OLED variants, where the result hovered around 1400 nits. Nevertheless, we are still talking about a remarkable result, unprecedented in OLED televisions of this size. The colour reproduction is equally impressive. The new Tandem OLED panel virtually catches up with QD-OLED televisions, offering excellent coverage of a wide colour gamut. The results are slightly weaker than with QD-OLED, but in practice, they still provide an image whose intensity and naturalness of colours are hard to compare with any other television.

Such a large number of zones did not only result in deep, inky blacks, but also in screen brightness. The X11L is an extremely bright television. Peak brightness can easily exceed 4,000 nits, and with the special "Boost" mode active it can, in specific conditions, even reach marketing figures around 9,000 to 10,000 nits. It is undoubtedly one of the brightest, if not the brightest, screens on the market. So how do these numbers relate to real film measurements? The results are very good, though of course far from the marketing claims. The brightness we measured in real film scenes was around 2,000 to 3,000 nits. That is an excellent result, given that the vast majority of content available is recorded and produced for those brightness levels, even the rare material mastered to 4,000 nits. But it also clearly shows that the figures the manufacturer touts do not always translate directly to the video material you have at home. The only "quirk" (if you can call it that) is that when very small, bright elements appear on screen, their brightness falls below 2,000 nits. The dimming algorithm does this deliberately to preserve deep blacks and minimise halo. This is entirely understandable, and the effect is still very impressive, but it also shows that even with such powerful hardware, Mini-LED technology has its limits and does not always work without compromise. In HDR itself, brightness is not the only thing that matters; colour saturation and the colours themselves do too. On the X11L these are very good thanks to the new Super QLED (SQD) quantum dots. The application of a new coating filter has delivered excellent results in covering the P3 colour gamut and the ultra-wide BT.2020. Although it does not reach the promised 100% of BT.2020, figures around 89 to 90% can be considered excellent. Colours are not far off those of RGB Mini-LED screens. We can even say they are more stable, due to a less demanding algorithm that RGB screens often struggle with.

Factory color reproduction

6/10

5.2/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

The best picture mode straight out of the box is undoubtedly Filmmaker Mode. This is a mode that has been available in Samsung televisions for several years and is intended to reproduce the image as faithfully as possible to the creators' vision. In SDR material, it performs reasonably well, although not without faults. The image is slightly subdued, and the white balance tends to shift towards red and blue, resulting in a slight pinkish tint on the screen. The average colour errors hover around a value of ΔE 3–4, which is at the limit of what most people can discern with the naked eye.

Much more pronounced are the limitations when it comes to HDR content. Here, a slight excess of blue in the white balance is not such a big problem – the real obstacle is the way the television manages brightness. In many scenes, the image appeared as if it had been overexposed, and details in the blacks could completely disappear. The final effect did not reflect what the hardware of this class is capable of and led to significant colour errors. It's hard to understand why such a factory characteristic was chosen, as the HDR reception in this version was definitely not what it should have been.

Turning on what should theoretically be the best Filmmaker Mode, you expect a one-to-one image of what the director saw. On the X11L it's fairly good, but this mode has obvious faults, which our measurements immediately exposed. Let's start with SDR. Both the white balance and the gamma are simply misaligned. The whites contain too much blue and red, giving the screen a slight pink tint. That also affected the gamma, which instead of holding the cinematic 2.4 drifts closer to 2.2. What did that result in? The whole image is therefore more pushed and looks artificially brighter. The worst comes at the end, namely the HDR measurements. Apart from this slight white-balance shift, the X11L fails on the brightness-management curve, the so-called EOTF. What we saw in the measurements immediately explains what we noticed earlier in films. The image is unnaturally brightened because the curve is massively overshot above the reference. The TV simply blatantly lifts the dark parts of the picture to create a "wow" effect, completely ignoring the director's intent.

Color reproduction after calibration

9.4/10

7/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, the S95F shows what it is truly capable of. The white balance has been corrected and minor inaccuracies adjusted, resulting in an almost exemplary image for SDR content. The colour differences have dropped below the level that the human eye can perceive – looking at the screen gives a sense of complete naturalness and colour coherence.

In HDR, the improvement is equally noticeable. The TV performs much better with brightness, eliminating the issue of "blowing out" the entire frame. Bright scenes are more controlled, and blacks retain more detail, although there can still be a slight brightening of the image as a whole. However, this does not change the fact that after calibration, the S95F delivers an image that can comfortably be called one of the best on the market – regardless of whether we are watching movies in SDR or spectacular productions in HDR.

After professional calibration we primarily managed to fully tame the SDR signal. Here the X11L responded perfectly to our adjustments. We were able to completely correct the white balance, remove that pink tint and set gamma to a stable 2.4. After that the picture finally became consistent with the director's vision, natural and free of artificial boosts. We also made minimal tweaks to HDR, but the TV's biggest flaw remained unchanged. It's of course about how the X11L manages its brightness and how much it overshoots the EOTF curve. Unfortunately, TCL provides virtually no tools to adjust this parameter. Even during professional calibration the software offers no way to rein in this curve, so the TV will always tend to brighten the image in HDR on its own.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.6/10

9.5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The S95F version with the Tandem OLED panel also handles the fluidity of tonal transitions very well. Although WOLED panels have not typically been the strongest in this category, it is difficult to spot any serious issues here. The gradation of colours is smooth and natural, and the only minor imperfections may appear with brighter colours. However, they are not significant enough to spoil the overall impression of the picture – the whole thing presents itself at a really high level.

The smoothness of tonal transitions deserves praise. Both in bright and dark areas the image simply looks smooth and is free from irritating banding or contouring. Importantly, with Dolby Vision material this issue is not particularly noticeable either, which is often not the case with other TVs. Minor gradation errors are visible only on specific shades of grey, but they are so small that in everyday use they will bother practically no one. In this respect the X11L performs almost perfectly.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

8/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

In the Samsung S95F model, there is a noise reduction feature aimed at improving the smoothness of tonal transitions. Its operation can hardly be called ineffective – on the contrary, it can overly interfere with the image. Older films or materials of poorer quality, such as those from YouTube, acquire a soft, smoothed character thanks to it, reminiscent of a painting effect. The problem is that along with the noise, the natural film grain disappears, stripping the image of its cinematic character. Fortunately, the feature does not blur significant details, so its use is more a matter of taste. If someone prefers a slightly polished and smooth image, it is worth enabling, but in our opinion, the most sensible setting is “Standard”.

A better impression is left by the upscaling. The S95F efficiently enhances the quality of lower resolution content – even 576p video looks quite good, although minor artifacts in the form of blockiness can be noticed. Overall, the effect is very solid, although when compared to competitors – such as the Sony Bravia 8 (II) or LG G5 – it is noticeable that those models can extract a bit more from the image. However, it is worth remembering one inconvenience: with older films and photos, there is an overscan issue that causes a slight cutting off of the left edge of the image.

Much like the C8L model we tested earlier, TCL has delivered a substantial upgrade in its flagship X series. It's all thanks to the MediaTek Pentonic 800 processor used in this model. Thanks to it, features for smoothing tonal transitions and even upscaling content to higher resolutions finally look as they should. The biggest Achilles' heel of previous TCL models has at last been addressed. The processor handles digital processing superbly and, in this respect, the TV no longer lags behind flagship models from Korea or even the most refined ones from Japan.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.5/10

7.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
165Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
BFI function 120Hz
-
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
Brightness drop with BFI
52%
50%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@165Hz):

Blur (1080p@288Hz):

In the case of the 83-inch S95F with a Tandem OLED panel, the fluidity of motion also makes a huge impression. The panel, with a native resolution of 4K, offers a refresh rate of 165 Hz, and this combined with organic technology makes games and sports look superb. Additionally, the manufacturer has added a film smoother and a motion blur reduction system, allowing each viewer to adjust the image to their own preferences – whether it's a more "frame-rate" cinematic effect or a smooth, almost theatrical spectacle.

From a specification standpoint the X11L can impress, supporting refresh rates up to 144 Hz at 4K, and it can be pushed to as much as 288 Hz in Full HD. However, from a real-world usage perspective we were most interested in how the screen performs at 120 Hz. After all, that is the limit for today’s hardware, with current-generation consoles leading the way. How does that look in practice? Even though it uses a VA panel, the screen does not exhibit significant smearing. With very fast-moving objects you can notice a slight trailing, but it is subtle enough that it hardly stands out while gaming or watching sport. The motion smoothing feature called "Motion Clarity" is also very useful here, allowing you to adjust motion smoothness to your preference. Recommended settings can be found in the picture.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.6/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 165Hz
    48 - 288Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Low smearing and phenomenal motion fluidity, which are the hallmarks of OLED displays, are just the warm-up. The Samsung S95F has been designed with gamers in mind – and this is evident at every turn. Four HDMI 2.1 ports with a bandwidth of 40 Gb/s may sound like a compromise on paper, but in practice, neither consoles nor PCs will experience the slightest limitation here. On board, there is a full set of gaming features: Variable Refresh Rate (VRR), Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM), as well as a flawlessly implemented HGiG standard that allows you to enjoy HDR exactly as the creators intended. All of this is complemented by Game Bar – an intuitive command centre where you can check and adjust the most important settings in seconds.

Particular attention should also be paid to Game Motion Plus, Samsung's proprietary motion smoothing technology. It can add extra fluidity to animations, which can be a lifesaver in games running at 60 frames per second, where stability doesn't always hold up. Indeed, support for Dolby Vision in games is lacking, but it’s hard to consider this a serious flaw – the manufacturer compensates for this gap with other solutions. The S95F is one of the absolute favourites for the title of the best gaming television on today's market.

For gamers the X11L is simply a superb screen. TCL has already accustomed us to the fact that it packs virtually every available feature into its products, and the flagship from the X series is no different. Thanks to the new processor, the X11L has as many as four HDMI 2.1 ports with full 48 Gbps bandwidth. Naturally, HDMI 2.1 brings a set of very useful features, such as Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM) and VRR frame synchronisation, covering the full refresh range up to 288 Hz. All these features can be conveniently controlled from the dedicated Game Bar. Interestingly, its appearance can be customised to your taste; there are three preset themes to choose from, directly referencing the Nintendo, PlayStation and Xbox consoles. And speaking of Xbox, the X11L also supports Dolby Vision Gaming without any issues.

When gaming in the standard HDR10 format, however, you need to bear in mind the specific tuning of the brightness curve, which can prove troublesome during initial setup. Although the TV supports HGiG, configuring everything via the PlayStation or Xbox system menu can be difficult. The screen’s algorithms tend to artificially brighten the test checkerboard pattern, making it really hard to hit the correct white clipping point by eye. For HDR10 to look correct, we suggest manually setting the console brightness in the console menu to around 2,500–3,000 nits.

Input lag

10/10

9.8/10

SDR

1080p60
10 ms
17 ms
1080p120
5 ms
10 ms
2160p60
10 ms
16 ms
2160p120
5 ms
10 ms

HDR

2160p60
10 ms
16 ms
2160p120
5 ms
9 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
16 ms
2160p120 DV
10 ms

The input lag on the Samsung S95F is absolutely top-notch – just 5 ms with 120 Hz content is stunning. The response to our actions on the controller is almost instantaneous, providing a sense of complete control over the gameplay. Of course, with 60 Hz content, the lag is doubled, but even 10 ms is hard to consider a reason for complaints – it’s still a result that will satisfy both demanding gamers and e-sports perfectionists.

Input lag is very good. Results of around 10-15 ms don't exactly break market records, but in practice they provide the exact same level of comfort as top 5 ms displays. At such low values the difference becomes purely theoretical. During gaming no one can detect any delay.

Compatibility with PC

8.8/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Average
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
5ms
9ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BWRG
RGB
Max refresh rate
165Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

In the version with the WOLED panel, the Samsung S95F also shows its claws – PC gamers have a complete gaming package at their disposal with low input lag, support for G-Sync and FreeSync, and fast refresh rates. This is hardware that can easily replace a monitor even in dynamic titles. When working with text, the differences compared to QD-OLED are subtle yet noticeable – the BWGR subpixel arrangement may give the impression of a slight softening of the edges of letters, as if the text has a delicate shadow. This is not a flaw that ruins the comfort of using a PC, rather a feature arising from the panel's construction.

PC compatibility on the X11L is very good, mainly thanks to a powerful suite of gaming features. In addition to console-style benefits and very high refresh rates, it supports PC frame-sync technologies (G-Sync Compatible and AMD FreeSync Premium Pro), tailored to particular GPUs. In short, in terms of gaming, even from a PC source, this screen is simply outstanding. Text work is somewhat weaker, though, because of the fonts' particular legibility. Looking closely at the letters, you can see that horizontal strokes are slightly darker than the verticals, and faint artefacts appear around the edges. The truth is, however, that from a metre or two away this is completely unnoticeable. And given the size of the X11L series, nobody is likely to put this 'beast' on their desk. 😉

Viewing angles

7.6/10

4.5/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
34%
69%

In the variant with the WOLED matrix, the viewing angles are good and absolutely adequate for everyday watching. The fact is that the QD-OLED panel performs better in this respect, and with a strong angle, you can notice a slight shift in colours; however, this is not something that disrupts a normal viewing experience. Sitting on the sofa – whether in the middle or slightly to the side – the picture still looks very good, and most viewers will be fully satisfied.

Thanks to its proprietary WHVA 2.0 panel, the viewing angles (for an LCD TV with this type of panel) are really decent. Colours do not wash out as much as they do with classic VA panels often found in lower-tier models. That said, it is not on the level of good IPS/ADS panels, and certainly not of any OLED, but all the same it is not a weak point of this model.

Daytime performance

7.7/10

10/10

Panel finish
Matte
Glare
Reflection suppression
Very Good
Average
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

TCL X11L: 1949 cd/m2

SAMSUNG S95F (TANDEM OLED 83"): 704 cd/m2

This is probably the first television in the world where two worlds have come together – the matte finish from Samsung and the WOLED panel from LG Display. And it's fair to say that such a duo makes a stunning impression. Light reflections virtually disappear, and the image does not lose its naturalness – colours remain saturated, and black does not lighten as it does in QD-OLED. It sounds almost like an industry joke, but it turns out that the combination of technologies from two rivals has produced a result better than anyone could have expected. Moreover, the panel's brightness, hovering around 700 nits, means that the television performs excellently even in difficult daytime conditions.

The X11L offers outstanding daytime viewing performance, mainly thanks to its extremely high brightness. In SDR content the TV can on average pump out around 2000 nits! The screen is so bright that in typical home conditions it will easily cut through any sunlight entering the room. In that respect, a bright day is no challenge for it. The only drawback for the X11L in this area is a rather glossy panel. Unfortunately this screen doesn't suppress reflections well, so it acts a bit like a mirror. For that reason, when watching in the evening it's best not to switch on lights directly opposite the screen, as lamps and bright items in the room will be fairly clearly visible on the panel surface.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
Software version during testing
T-RSMFDEUC-0090-1042.5, E2500007, BT-S
v8-0015T01-LF1V080.000644
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review SAMSUNG S95F (TANDEM OLED 83") TV Panel details
Review TCL X11L TV Panel details

SAMSUNG S95F (TANDEM OLED 83")

TCL X11L

TV features

7.9/10

8.3/10

  • System
    Tizen
    Google TV
  • System performance
    Very good
    Very good
  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 40Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    Yes
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review SAMSUNG S95F (TANDEM OLED 83") TV features
Review SAMSUNG S95F (TANDEM OLED 83") TV features
Review SAMSUNG S95F (TANDEM OLED 83") TV features
Review SAMSUNG S95F (TANDEM OLED 83") TV features
Review TCL X11L TV features
Review TCL X11L TV features
Review TCL X11L TV features
Review TCL X11L TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    No
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

SmartTV in S95F: Tizen

Samsung S95F is not just a screen for films and games, but also a well-developed smart platform. The Tizen system runs quickly and smoothly – it is hard to encounter stutter or major issues here. In everyday use, we have everything we need: AirPlay, screen sharing from smartphones, and voice search (which works even without the remote in hand). It is a closed system, so we won't find every app available on Android, but the library is rich enough that no one is likely to feel deprived. Additionally, there is SmartThings, which integrates with smart home devices, allowing the TV to be more than just a display.

Classic features of the S95F

A pleasant surprise is the presence of features that are often omitted in this class of equipment – PiP, teletext, and the ability to connect headphones via Bluetooth. The only thing missing is USB recording from the built-in DVB-T/T2 tuners, but Samsung makes up for this with an excellent remote (tiny), which can easily control other devices, including the Canal+ decoder. The One Connect module also deserves praise – having all the inputs hidden in a separate box is a huge convenience, especially for those who frequently juggle connected devices. Thus, it is difficult to point out any element that could provoke complaints here.

Smart TV: Google TV

From the Smart TV perspective, the flagship TCL runs Google TV and it is simply excellent software. The platform offers a huge app library that includes virtually every major video-on-demand (VOD) service. Everything runs very smoothly, and the intuitive interface makes daily content browsing easy. A major plus is the responsive voice assistant which, together with Gemini AI support, can accurately suggest films and series based on our previous choices.

Classic features and the remote

While the Smart TV system is top tier, when it comes to conventional features there is really not much to say. The TV provides a well-functioning teletext and that is pretty much all you can expect from traditional television features. TCL has skimped on the basics. There is no USB recording function (PVR) and not even a picture-in-picture (PiP) option. As for the remote, it is very well made, sits comfortably in the hand and even has backlit buttons that make it easier to use at night. Unfortunately, the manufacturer chose not to include numeric buttons. That may not go down well with older viewers or those who like to flick through channels in the traditional way by entering their numbers.

Apps

9.3/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9/10

9.4/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
No
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the S95F works quite well, although it is not without its limitations. It handles most popular video and audio formats, but there may be some concerns with photos. The manufacturer's claims do not always align with reality – for example, HEIC files would not open. On the other hand, for most users, such a set of features will be perfectly sufficient; however, if someone needed something more advanced, they could always look for an alternative in the Tizen catalogue (if they can find one) or use wireless connectivity 😉.

The built-in player works very well. During our tests we examined it from every angle and it played virtually every video file and audio format we threw at it without a hitch. The only minor quirk is that the player refused to work with external text files in .txt format. If that is a major issue for you, the operating system can help: from the app store you can always install a third-party player, such as the reliable VLC, which will handle any kind of subtitles. In most cases you won't need to, though, because the stock TCL app is absolutely top-tier when it comes to file compatibility.

Sound

8/10

8.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    82dB
    84dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

The built-in speakers of the S95F can be pleasantly surprising – they sound enjoyable and clear, and despite the slim construction of the television, it is hard to say that the sound is flat. Admittedly, there could be more bass, but this is a natural compromise with such a thin casing. For everyday watching of films or series, the set performs excellently. Those who enjoy stronger sensations should consider a soundbar – preferably one with Q-Symphony support. Then the television speakers and the Samsung soundbar work together.

The sound in the X11L is really good, thanks to a very elaborate audio system. The Bang & Olufsen-branded speakers here perform very well: the sound is relatively spacious, clean and free of any odd interference or cabinet resonances even at higher volumes. In that respect the X11L delivers. Still, we feel a slight sense of disappointment. Considering the front of the case has an integrated soundbar, we expected somewhat better sound. We certainly wouldn't compare this sound to similar solutions fitted by direct competitors. Despite our small reservation, the sound is definitely above average and solid. It's ideal for everyday viewing, and buying a basic soundbar without a subwoofer for this model makes no sense at all.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

82dBC (Max)

75dBC

84dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy