PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) vs Samsung S90H (QD-OLED)

Direct comparison

The One 2025 / PUS9060 / PUS9010 / PUS9000

Info

S90HAT / S90HAE / S92HAT

Info

Available screen sizes: 75”

Available screen sizes: 77”

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: QD-OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.5

8.6

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.9

    9.0

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.6

    9.3

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.7

    9.0

  • Gaming on console

    8.1

    9.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.9

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    5.4

    6.4

  • Utility functions

    6.1

    7.3

  • Apps

    6.7

    9.3

  • Sound quality

    6.6

    8.4

Advantages

  • Very good viewing angles thanks to the IPS panel

  • Great compatibility with PC, 144 Hz mode, proper support for G-Sync and FreeSync

  • A wide range of features for gamers, variable refresh rate, auto game mode, HGiG

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including HDR10+ and Dolby Vision

  • Support for Dolby Atmos

  • Low input lag

  • Effective P5 image processor for lower quality materials

  • Ambilight system

  • Illuminated remote control

  • Perfect blacks and infinite contrast

  • Very high HDR brightness (up to 1700 nits)

  • Excellent colour gamut coverage (QD-OLED)

  • Reference-grade image reproduction after professional calibration

  • Excellent motion clarity (no smearing)

  • Outstanding for gamers (4x HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, low input lag)

  • High panel refresh rate (up to 165Hz)

  • Perfect viewing angles

  • Effective anti-reflective coating (matte)

  • Fast, responsive Tizen system

  • Surprisingly good sound

Disadvantages

No like
  • Poor black levels and contrast (typical for IPS panels)

  • Significantly lower brightness compared to the VA panel variant

  • Visible backlight bleed at the edges of the screen in the tested unit

  • Limited number of applications in the Titan OS system

  • The remote control is still based on infrared, requiring aiming at the screen

  • In bright light, blacks can take on a cherry tint (a characteristic of QD-OLED panels)

  • The matte coating in strong light affects the perceived colour saturation

  • Lack of TV features such as USB recording or PIP

  • No support for DTS:X (an issue for Blu-ray disc fans)

  • Why can't we find this panel in all sizes?!

Our verdict

Philips PUS9010 (The One 2025) in the 75-inch version with an IPS panel is a television that clearly demonstrates the differences resulting from the panel used. Compared to the variant with a VA panel, it offers significantly better viewing angles, very good compatibility with consoles, and excellent text readability, but at the same time, it loses on black levels and maximum brightness. This model is best suited for everyday use, gaming, and in larger living rooms where not everyone is sitting perfectly facing the screen. The television performs very well in terms of responsiveness and features for gamers, offering 144 Hz, low input lag, and full support for variable refresh rate. An additional advantage is Ambilight, which, especially in the evening, can enhance the viewing experience and partially mask the weaker black levels of the IPS panel. After calibration, the picture appears coherent and natural, and the differences compared to the VA version in colour reproduction become difficult to detect. On the other hand, it must be clearly stated that those inclined towards cinematic viewing in complete darkness may be disappointed. The poor black levels, boosted brightness resulting from the quality of our unit, meant that this variant of the PUS9060 performs worse than the same model with a VA panel. Philips PUS9010 IPS is generally a sensible choice for users looking for a large, modern television for gaming, PC use, and everyday viewing, with very good viewing angles. However, if the priority is deep blacks and better picture quality, it is worth considering other variants or a higher class of equipment, as often for a small additional payment, you can get a television equipped with mini-LED technology.

Samsung, what have you actually done? The S90H is a TV that won us over practically from the first minutes. If you want a short answer to whether it's worth the money, we’ll be blunt: yes, absolutely. The combination of perfect, organic black with very high brightness and the vivid colors of the QD-OLED panel creates an effect that wows you from the first time you turn it on. Choosing a matte finish proved to be a perfect decision. No more constant battles with the blinds or seeing your own reflection on a sunny day. Sure, purists like us will notice that in a heavily sunlit room the blacks can slightly shift toward grayish-maroon tones, but daytime usability here is invaluable. Most importantly, in the evening and at night the picture still delivers everything we love about OLEDs: perfect black, excellent contrast, and amazing depth. Add to that a fast, refined Tizen system and an almost complete package of gaming features led by Game Motion Plus. The result is an exceptionally complete TV where minor software niggles don't change the overall, very positive impression. So does the S90H have any serious downside? As far as the TV itself is concerned, it's hard to point to anything that would really spoil its appeal. The biggest reservation is more about Samsung's policy. To this day it's hard for us to understand why such a great QD-OLED panel is available only in the 77-inch model we tested, with the HAT suffix in the name. Maybe that will change in the future, but for now that's how it stands. So if you're aiming exactly for this variant, there's no need to hesitate. The Samsung S90H in the 77-inch QD-OLED version is one of the most exciting TVs of the year. Once the early-adopter tax drops and stronger promotions arrive, it could become one of the most cost-effective OLEDs on the market, and quite possibly one of 2026's biggest bestsellers.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Toslink (Optical audio)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 1Gbit
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps, Ethernet (LAN) 1Gbit
Build quality
Good
Premium
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

2.9/10

10/10

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,300:1

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,400:1

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,450:1

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,500:1

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,350:1

Review Samsung S90H (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

In the 75-inch version of the Philips PUS9010 that we tested, an IPS panel has been used, which is immediately noticeable in terms of black levels and contrast. Compared to the 55-inch variant with a VA panel that we tested earlier, the difference is evident from the first scenes. The black is shallower, and in a dark room, the screen clearly tends towards greys. The television is not equipped with local dimming, so in low light, dark scenes lack depth. In practice, the picture looks noticeably worse than in the smaller 55-inch variant, especially during film sessions viewed in the evening. The situation is somewhat salvaged by Ambilight. The rear lighting can gently "trick" the eye, improving perceived contrast and making the blacks seem a bit deeper. It's a simple trick, but it works. That's why this model is definitely better watched with Ambilight turned on. It doesn't have to be a multi-colour mode following the image. Even a uniform white backlight can enhance the perception of dark scenes.

Because the Samsung S90H uses an OLED panel, it deserves top marks for contrast and black levels. Importantly, this applies both to the WOLED-panel version and to the QD-OLED variant we tested. Each pixel emits light independently and can be turned off completely, so the TV delivers perfect blacks and virtually infinite contrast. This results in excellent image depth and a very clear separation of bright elements from a dark background, without the halo effect (blooming) that still occurs even in the best LCD TVs. The effect is particularly striking when watching in a darkened room, where dark scenes look incredibly realistic and the picture gains in three-dimensionality and detail.

HDR effect quality

5.2/10

7.8/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 90.6%, Bt.2020: 66.9%
DCI P3: 99.8%, Bt.2020: 89.6%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

374 nit

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

383 nit

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

397 nit

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

391 nit

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

401 nit

Review Samsung S90H (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1464 nit

Review Samsung S90H (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1470 nit

Review Samsung S90H (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1269 nit

Review Samsung S90H (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1505 nit

Review Samsung S90H (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

902 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung S90H (QD-OLED)

PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS)

In the Philips PUS9010 version with an IPS panel, the HDR brightness unfortunately performs worse than in the previously tested 55-inch model with a VA panel. The difference reaches about 100 nits, which is quite noticeable given the relatively low values. While the VA version could exceed 500 nits, here the maximum brightness is around 400 nits. This level still allows for watching movies and series in HDR, especially on streaming platforms, but the effects are clearly muted. Bright elements do not have the same impact, and scenes requiring high luminance appear less impressive. On the positive side, the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour gamut is commendable. The IPS version offers around 91%, which is about 5% more than the variant with a VA panel. This translates to somewhat better colour saturation in HDR content, despite the lower brightness. Colours can appear more vibrant and cohesive, especially in colourful scenes.

The Samsung S90H is a genuinely bright TV for the mid-range OLED segment. In synthetic tests its peak brightness reached around 1650 nits. That’s an impressive result in this class, roughly 50% higher than what we have seen from previous models in this price bracket. Most importantly, these tests translate directly to real video material. In four out of five film clips we tested, the S90H’s brightness ranged between 1300 and 1500 nits. That headroom allows it to reproduce most HDR films with very high dynamic range and without obvious compromises, especially in material mastered to 1000–1500 nits. In practice light effects, reflections and explosions have the appropriate punch, and the picture does not appear dimmed. Of course, on full-screen very bright scenes the result is naturally lower and drops to around 900 nits. This is a direct result of the OLED panel’s protection systems working to prevent overload. Even in this scenario there is little to complain about. Those 900 nits across the whole screen is still a very high level, ensuring excellent dynamic range in HDR content.

Colour has always been a major strength of QD-OLED TVs, and the S90H is no exception. The DCI-P3 colour space we measured reached a full 100% (actually 99.9%), while coverage of the much wider BT.2020 gamut hit about 89%. That’s an excellent result, enabling very saturated and vivid colours in HDR content. It’s worth emphasising that QD-OLED’s advantage over WOLED panels is not limited to palette coverage alone. In practice it’s mainly visible in the higher brightness of saturated colours, that is in a greater colour volume. As a result, intense reds, greens and blues in HDR look more vibrant and more striking.

Factory color reproduction

5.9/10

8.3/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

We assessed the colour reproduction, as always, on the factory settings, focusing on the movie mode, which for Philips usually provides the best starting point. This is also a good moment to demonstrate how much the same TV model can vary depending on the type of panel used. Looking at the white balance, the overall tendency remains similar to the variant with the VA panel. Excessive red in the whites is still noticeable, but in the tested unit with an IPS panel, there are also deficits in the blue channel. As a result, the image has a slightly different colour character, which can be clearly seen in the comparative materials. This is a very good example illustrating why ready-made settings downloaded from the internet do not always work even within the same model.

However, returning to the assessment itself, this unit performs quite well, especially with SDR content. Colour tests show correct saturation and consistency, with no glaring errors that could interfere with everyday viewing. In HDR materials, slight deficits in reds can already be noticed, but these are not flaws that spoil the overall perception of the image. The biggest limitations do not come directly from the colours, but rather from the white and black levels. The use of an IPS panel and slightly lowered gamma results in the image being slightly boosted in brightness, and the poor black levels further affect the perceived contrast. This makes the overall picture look brighter, but at the same time it loses depth, especially during evening viewing.

The next stage of the test was to check how the S90H handles colour reproduction without any calibration. As always, we carried out the measurements in Filmmaker Mode, the best factory picture preset. And here Samsung really deserves praise. The factory tuning is at a very high level, and a few years ago this was not one of its strong points. The average colour error (Delta E) remained around 3, which is below the level at which most people can notice any inaccuracies. Only in the brightest shades of grey did the values slightly approach 4, but even then it's hard to regard this as a real problem while watching. For out-of-the-box settings, the result is simply excellent.

Color reproduction after calibration

8/10

9.4/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, the picture was brought to a truly sensible level. The overall look is coherent and natural, and when it comes to colour reproduction, it is difficult to unequivocally state whether we are dealing with a VA or IPS panel. This is a good sign, showing that the television has a solid foundation for further adjustments. It is worth noting the larger colour gamut coverage in this variant, which can subtly enhance the perception of colourful scenes, particularly in HDR content. However, this advantage is largely balanced out by the boosted black levels resulting from the use of an IPS panel. The limited black depth affects the perceived contrast, especially when watching in a dark room. Consequently, despite the noticeable improvement after calibration, the final assessment remains the same as in the variant with the VA panel. Better colours are unable to fully compensate for the weaker black levels.

All right, but you know we wouldn't be ourselves if we didn't also check how far we could push the S90H after professional calibration. And there was no big surprise. Since the factory settings were already very good, there wasn't much room for improvement. Even so, we managed to refine the picture to near perfection. After calibration the mean colour reproduction errors fell below the threshold of perception, with Delta E values under 2 for both SDR and HDR material. We also improved the brightness response, so the image more faithfully reflects the creators' intent and maintains appropriate tonality across the whole luminance range. After professional calibration the S90H therefore becomes a display very close to reference.

Will the difference be spectacular for everyone? Not necessarily. The factory settings already deliver a very high level, so in everyday viewing some people may not notice a dramatic jump. Much also depends on the individual unit. Our sample was very well tuned straight out of the box, but that doesn't mean every S90H will perform at the same level. Even identical models can differ from each other in terms of factory calibration. That's exactly why professional calibration makes sense: it allows a specific unit to be brought to the highest possible accuracy, rather than relying on a bit of luck when buying.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.5/10

9/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

When it comes to the fluidity of tonal transitions, in the 75-inch version with an IPS panel, we have mixed feelings. Looking solely at the colourful gradients, the transitions perform even better than in the variant with a VA panel. The colours blend more smoothly, and typical banding issues are less noticeable. However, the situation changes dramatically in dark scenes. The tragic black characteristic of IPS effectively ruins the perception of tonal transitions in the low brightness areas. The boosted black makes it difficult to notice subtle shades of colours, and the very unnatural backlight bleed further exacerbates the situation. In the tested specimen, the backlight bleed was particularly noticeable at the edges, where the light almost pierced through to the screen. This not only negatively impacts the perception of dark scenes but also significantly hampers a reliable assessment of the gradation itself.

The smoothness of tonal transitions here is exceptionally high. In most content it's hard to spot any obvious posterisation, and if it does occur, it's only in the most demanding scenes. That's one of the traits we often observe in well-tuned QD-OLED panels. In practice they can perform better in terms of gradation than many classic WOLEDs, although of course much also depends on the electronics and the specific model. So if you care about the smoothest possible gradients, the tested variant with a QD-OLED panel has a clear advantage here.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.7/10

7.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
No
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

In the Philips PUS9010, we find another iteration of the P5 Perfect Picture image processor, designed to improve the quality of inferior materials. One of the components of this system is the distortion reduction function, which is responsible for smoothing tonal transitions. It works effectively and indeed reduces the visible colour gradation. Unfortunately, it does so quite aggressively. In practice, it can dim details such as the texture of materials or film grain. This is a notable compromise, so we would not recommend it for movie screenings. However, it performs significantly better with more casual content like YouTube or regular television. The P5 processor also manages quite well with lower resolution materials. The image is soft, at times even too soft, but this can easily be corrected with the sharpness slider, adjusting the effect to personal preference. A positive aspect is also the lack of edge trimming in SD materials, which is still not standard in this class of televisions.

In this respect Samsung has changed practically nothing compared with last year’s model, which is actually quite good news. The feature responsible for smoothing tonal transitions still very effectively limits the posterisation effect. However, you should remember that it works rather aggressively, because besides the artefacts themselves it can also remove film grain and slightly soften fine image detail. As always, this is therefore a matter of compromise and personal preference. If you want the most faithful reproduction of the source material possible, we recommend leaving this function turned off.

There is also little to be said about upscaling in terms of revolution. The S90H uses the same proprietary NQ4 Gen3 image processor as its predecessor, so scaling quality has remained practically unchanged. The TV handles lower-resolution material well, effectively improving its sharpness. However, the overscan problem has still not been solved. With some older material, especially archival recordings, it may happen that a portion of the image at the edges is cropped. It’s a minor flaw, but a shame Samsung has left this issue unchanged for another year running.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.7/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
165Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
50%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur (4K@165HZ):

Philips PUS9010 has a 4K panel with a refresh rate of 144 Hz, which will be appreciated primarily by sports fans and gamers. This is especially evident in dynamic scenes where the motion is sharp, and annoying blur is almost non-existent. When it comes to movies (standard 24 fps), Philips gives us a proven set of settings known from higher series. Two sliders are used to control motion. “Smoothness” allows you to adjust the image to your own taste: at low settings, we maintain a cinematic character, while moving the slider to the right gives us a perfectly smooth, albeit somewhat “theatrical” effect. On the other hand, “Motion Blur Reduction” is a function designed for sports – it ensures that fast-moving objects do not lose detail and remain clear.

In terms of motion handling the S90H delivers a very high level. A new feature here is a panel with a refresh rate of up to 165 Hz, although in practice that will mainly benefit PC gamers. Films, series and sports broadcasts do not use such high refresh rates, so when watching them the difference compared with the standard 120 Hz will not be noticeable. That said, thanks to the OLED panel's lightning-fast response time motion is very clean and the picture does not suffer from the motion blur typical of many LCDs. Samsung has equipped the television with extensive motion-smoothness settings. You get two sliders: judder reduction and blur reduction, which let you easily tailor the picture's character to your own preferences. You can easily achieve a very smooth image when watching sport, but you can just as well preserve a more cinematic feel at the typical 24 frames per second. It all depends on which effect you prefer.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

9.5/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 165Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The Philips PUS9010 is a truly solid machine for gaming. It has everything that matters: VRR, automatic game mode (ALLM), and support for HGiG. The latter is a great feature – it allows HDR in games to be set exactly as the developers envisioned. The television handles 120 Hz refresh rates effortlessly at every popular resolution (1080p, 1440p, and 4K). Whether you connect a PS5, Xbox, or a powerful PC, everything functions stably and simply as it should. Gamers will also appreciate the Game Bar. This quick, clear menu immediately shows whether the low latency mode is active. This is especially useful when frequently switching between different consoles. The whole experience is complemented by Ambilight. Evening sessions with this backlighting take the atmosphere to a whole new level – the image seems larger, and dynamic scenes leave an even better impression. Even if someone isn’t a fan of such “gadgets”, it’s hard to deny that it’s impressive.

From the outset the Samsung S90H feels like a TV designed with gamers in mind, and it's easy to see why. The manufacturer has equipped it with almost everything you could expect from a modern gaming screen. You get as many as four full-bandwidth HDMI 2.1 ports, support for ALLM and VRR, and very high refresh rates. There's also a clear Game Bar that lets you instantly check key picture parameters or change settings without leaving the game. Another very welcome improvement is the HGiG behaviour. Last year it could cause quite a few problems, but on the S90H it works exactly as it should.

Samsung's ace up its sleeve remains its proprietary Game Motion Plus mode. The feature works similarly to the motion smoothing used for films: it improves animation smoothness in games while keeping input lag at a very reasonable level. For titles running at 30 or 60 fps, with the right settings input lag did not exceed 40 ms in our tests. That's a very good result, especially since with many manufacturers enabling similar features results in delays several times higher. Game Motion Plus does not, of course, replace Dolby Vision Gaming, as it's a completely different type of feature, but overall it's a gaming addition that many players may find more noticeable. Smoother motion in 30/60 fps games often makes a bigger difference than HDR itself (which, incidentally, is often poorly implemented in games).

Input lag

9.5/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
18 ms
10 ms
1080p120
8 ms
5 ms
2160p60
18 ms
10 ms
2160p120
8 ms
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
18 ms
10 ms
2160p120
8 ms
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
34 ms
2160p120 DV

In terms of responsiveness, the Philips PUS9010 performs very well. The input lag is around 9 ms at 120 Hz and 18 ms at 60 Hz, so the response to movement with the controller is quick and predictable. In practice, even dynamic action games or esports titles pose no problems. Dolby Vision in games performs less well. The lag then increases to around 35 ms, which will still be acceptable for less demanding players, but more sensitive individuals may start to feel a slight sluggishness in control. For this reason, HDR10 with HGiG enabled remains a better choice. In this model, it works correctly, providing lower latency and more predictable brightness behaviour, without the issues that can arise in Dolby Vision.

Input lag is another aspect that's really hard to fault. With a 120 Hz signal we measured just around 5 ms, which is a truly outstanding result. After switching to even higher refresh rates the latency dropped to astronomically low levels, virtually imperceptible during gaming. The Samsung S90H delivers absolutely market-leading results here.

Compatibility with PC

8.9/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
9ms
4ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RGB
RBG (QD-OLED)
Max refresh rate
144Hz
165Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

The Philips PUS9010 (2025) is a very good television for using with a PC. The manufacturer has provided a dedicated 144 Hz mode for PC gamers, and the television correctly supports variable refresh rates for both NVIDIA and AMD cards. The G-Sync and FreeSync features work seamlessly, making PC gaming smooth and free from screen tearing. Since we already know that the television is very suitable for gaming, it is worth noting the readability of text, especially when working daily on the PC. The use of an IPS panel is definitely a plus in this regard. The chroma has been implemented correctly, so we can talk about almost perfect font rendering. The text is sharp, clear and does not pose problems even with prolonged use. However, we must highlight a minor detail out of our meticulousness. With very dark text, vertical and horizontal lines can have slightly different brightness levels. This is, however, purely a technical flaw, practically imperceptible in practice, especially in the case of the 75-inch variant, where the distance from the screen additionally masks this effect.

The Samsung S90H works excellently as a large PC screen, and not only because of its gaming-oriented feature set. The panel supports a refresh rate of up to 165 Hz, has very low input lag, and the official NVIDIA G-Sync certification allows you to achieve smooth gameplay without screen tearing when used with GeForce graphics cards. If you’re looking for a large display that will handle demanding PC games well, the S90H is an excellent choice.

And what about everyday work with text or web browsing? That’s good too. Fonts are sharp and legible, although you should bear in mind the specifics of QD-OLED panels. Up close you can notice the characteristic triangular subpixel layout, which can make letter edges appear slightly jagged or pick up faint coloured fringing. Is that an issue? In practice, it’s minor. After all, we’re talking about a 77-inch screen, so few people will sit just a few dozen centimetres from the panel. From a normal viewing distance that effect becomes virtually invisible.

Viewing angles

5.8/10

9.9/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
58%
9%

The viewing angles on the Philips PUS9010 are very good, and this is one of the greatest advantages of the IPS panel. Compared to the variant with a VA panel, the difference is noticeable. The picture retains significantly better consistency, and the colours remain stable even when viewed from a sharp angle. Of course, with a change in position, the level of brightness does drop slightly; however, the degradation of the image is much less than in the VA version. It is not at the level known from OLED screens, but among LCD televisions, one can say that it has some of the better viewing angles available on the market.

As befits an OLED, the viewing angles are excellent, but the QD-OLED panel used here goes one step further in that respect. Even if we sit well to the side of the screen, the colours hardly lose saturation and the drop in brightness is marginal. There is also no sign of the greenish tint that can be irritating on some TVs with panels from LG Display. The image retains its colours very well regardless of the angle from which we view it.

Daytime performance

5.4/10

6.4/10

Panel finish
Satin
Matte
Reflection suppression
Decent
Very Good
Black levels during daytime
Good
Average

Panel brightness

Samsung S90H (QD-OLED): 486 cd/m2

PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS): 398 cd/m2

In terms of use in a bright room, the Philips PUS9010 performs reasonably well. The applied satin matrix effectively dampens reflections and does not create a mirror effect, which means the screen doesn't scatter as much light from windows or lamps. Unfortunately, compared to the VA panel variant, the television performs worse. The screen is noticeably darker, which can be felt in a very sunny room. Under normal daytime conditions, this does not pose a major problem; however, in very bright surroundings, the difference compared to the VA version is noticeable.

The biggest addition to the S90 range is the matte screen finish. Samsung has taken this step in this line for the first time and, in our view, it was a good move. You notice the difference straight away. The coating very effectively suppresses reflections, so even when there is a window opposite the TV or a strong lamp is shining, you won't see the typical mirror-like glare on the screen. Instead, only a gently diffused light appears, which interferes much less with viewing. If the TV is going to sit in a bright living room, that's really hard to overstate.

Of course there is a trade-off. QD-OLED with a matte coating has a characteristic trait: when strong light hits the screen, blacks can shift slightly towards a cherry tint, and colours may lose a little of their depth. This isn't a defect that occurs in every situation, but a quirk of this design under strong lighting. Fortunately the TV itself is bright enough that there are no issues watching during the day. In SDR it reaches around 500 nits of average brightness, and combined with the matte coating this makes for really comfortable viewing conditions.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
QD-OLED
Software version during testing
TPN258E_V058.002.236.151
1122
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS)

Samsung S90H (QD-OLED)

TV features

6.1/10

7.3/10

  • System
    Titan OS
    Tizen
  • System performance
    Decent
    Very good
  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 1Gbit
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps, Ethernet (LAN) 1Gbit
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) TV features
Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) TV features
Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) TV features
Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) TV features
Review Samsung S90H (QD-OLED) TV features
Review Samsung S90H (QD-OLED) TV features
Review Samsung S90H (QD-OLED) TV features
Review Samsung S90H (QD-OLED) TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    Yes
    No
  • Font size adjustment
    No
    Yes
  • Audio description
    No
    Yes

Classic TV Features

When it comes to classic features, the Philips PUS9010 is rather average. Onboard, we find the basics such as EPG, teletext, and the ability to connect headphones via Bluetooth. However, this is where the list of stronger points essentially ends. Unfortunately, it lacks USB recording and PiP (picture in picture) mode. These are features that are becoming increasingly rare but can still be useful in everyday use. A plus is the remote control with a numeric keypad. It is modern, backlit, and visually makes a very good impression. It's just a shame that it is still an infrared remote, so it requires aiming at the screen. With such a modern look, one would expect Bluetooth radio control.

Smart TV

Most Philips TVs from 2025, including the PUS9010, operate on the Titan OS system. This is still a relatively young platform, and unfortunately, its limitations are still apparent. The system itself runs quite smoothly, noticeably better than in the manufacturer's cheaper models, and during tests, it did not encounter issues when using screen mirroring or AirPlay, which is still not a given. However, the biggest drawback remains the limited number of available apps. This can be partially circumvented by connecting a keyboard and mouse to the TV and using the built-in web browser, but this is more of an emergency solution than a convenient everyday option.

Traditional TV

When it comes to ordinary cable or an aerial, Samsung hasn't reinvented the wheel. Putting all the AI fanfare to one side, the user largely gets the same as last year. The TV simply does its job: it switches channels smoothly, has a tuner and a CI module slot, so in many cases you can do without an external set-top box. Teletext is also still present. The compact remote is worth praising too; its biggest advantage is radio connectivity, so you don't have to point it directly at the TV to change anything. The problem is that almost every competitor offers most of these features today, and the S90H doesn't add anything particularly special. What's more, the manufacturer has taken a small step backwards. The PiP function, picture-in-picture, has disappeared from the S90 range. If you were in the habit of glancing at the news in the corner of the screen while watching another programme, you won't be able to do that here. A shame.

Smart TV: Tizen

While there's little to get excited about with traditional TV, the Tizen system in its 2026 incarnation is absolutely top-tier. Again putting AI features to one side, the main point is simple: the system is simply lightning fast. Response to commands from the remote is instantaneous, and when navigating menus there are no slow animations or irritating stutters. Although it doesn't include Google TV, the app catalogue is very broad. Practically all the major VOD streaming platforms are available, so it's hard to have any real complaints on that front. Fans of console-free gaming will also be pleased, because Samsung has significantly expanded the cloud gaming section, offering access to the main streaming services directly from the TV. As a Smart TV, the S90H is simply a very comprehensive and exceptionally fast device.

Apps

6.7/10

9.3/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

7.9/10

9.1/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The media player in the new Philips is a solid standard. It handles most popular video and audio files, operating steadily and predictably. Although fans of rarer subtitle formats or specific image resolutions may feel somewhat unsatisfied, for the average user, the built-in software does the job. It's a convenient solution that means we don't need to engage external equipment to play materials from an external drive.

Its built-in player handles most popular video, audio and photo formats very well. Its playback capabilities are comprehensive enough that you certainly won't miss the option to install external players, such as VLC. However, we encountered a serious bug when attempting to open HEIC photos from an iPhone. The S90H not only failed to display the files, but caused the system to freeze completely. The receiver stopped responding to any of our commands, so we had to reset it (unplugging it solved the issue). This appears to be a software bug that requires an urgent fix in the next firmware release.

Sound

6.6/10

8.4/10

  • Maximum volume
    85dB
    89dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The sound from the Philips PUS9010 is simply adequate. The tested unit offers a 2.0 set with a total power of 40 W, which is more than sufficient for daily watching of television, films, or series. The sound quality is pleasant, but it is hard to speak of anything exceptional, especially if one is looking for strong bass or greater dynamics. One positive aspect is the wide range of audio formats supported. When connecting a soundbar or home cinema system, the television easily supports Dolby Atmos and DTS, without needing to fiddle with settings or sacrificing sound quality. For those planning on external audio systems, this is definitely good news.

In theory, the audio specification of the S90 series has remained unchanged for several years. We still get a 2.1 speaker system with a total power of 40 W. However, when we powered up the unit we tested, we were pleasantly surprised. The television sounded noticeably better than the dry technical specifications or our recollections from previous models' tests would suggest. It's hard to say definitively whether this is down to optimisation of the sound-control software, or simply the fact that the 77-inch cabinet allows for slightly larger drivers and gives them better conditions to work in. The fact is the sound is fuller and more dynamic. That's a big plus for the manufacturer. Our only real gripe is the lack of support for the DTS format. Unfortunately, this is a standard increasingly being dropped by TV manufacturers, so Samsung is no exception. On the plus side, it does support the most popular spatial format, Dolby Atmos. Even so, fans of physical Blu-ray releases, where DTS tracks are still very common, may feel slightly disappointed.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

89dBC (Max)

75dBC