Panasonic W85 vs Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026)

Direct comparison

PQS9011 / PQS9001 / the one 2026

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Amazon FireTV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.1

6.8

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.5

    6.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.8

    6.3

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.8

    6.8

  • Gaming on console

    7.7

    7.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    4.2

    6.1

  • Utility functions

    6.8

    7.6

  • Apps

    7.6

    7.2

  • Sound quality

    5.8

    6.9

Advantages

  • VA matrix with high native contrast

  • High refresh rate of 120/144 Hz

  • Two HDMI 2.1 ports with support for ALLM, VRR, and Dolby Vision in games

  • Very low input lag

  • Fairly good colour gamut coverage thanks to the QLED filter

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Sturdy central stand

  • Great compatibility with PC – full chroma 4:4:4, clear fonts

  • Ambilight, which gives evening viewing sessions a distinctive atmosphere and improves the perceived native contrast of the VA panel

  • Excellent panel response time: minimal motion blur of moving objects

  • Many gaming features: four HDMI 2.1 ports, VRR, ALLM, HGiG

  • 144 Hz refresh at 4K and 240 Hz at Full HD from a PC

  • Good coverage of a wide colour gamut: PFS LED

  • Dolby Vision, which genuinely helps the TV with HDR content

  • Respectable brightness of around 500 nits, useful for daytime viewing

  • Swivelling base

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness (below 270 nits) – no real HDR

  • HDR mode in games is poorly developed, with incorrect HGiG implementation

  • Poor media file player

  • The FireTV system in Europe is poorly developed: there are micro stutters and awkward translations, and many applications are missing

  • Average sound quality, lacking depth

  • The motion smoother does not want to work

  • No local dimming: average blacks in the evening and limited HDR effect

  • Smaller app library than the competition

  • Poor viewing angles (can be mitigated with a swivel stand)

  • Very high input lag in games with Dolby Vision

  • Significant errors in HDR colour reproduction (no CMS adjustment available)

  • Infrared remote requiring direct aiming

Our verdict

The Panasonic W85B is a television that aims to prove that the Japanese brand can make not only high-end equipment but also something more "for the people." And indeed — on paper, it looks quite decent: a VA panel with solid contrast, high refresh rates of 120/144 Hz, two full HDMI 2.1 ports, and low input lag. It sounds like a great set for a gamer or someone who just wants an affordable TV with good fundamentals. However, the reality is a bit more complicated. The W85B performs well mainly with the SDR format, especially after calibration, and is suitable for typical daily use. But when we start demanding more from it — for example, expecting strong HDR effects or greater immersion in games with that mode turned on — the TV quickly reveals its limitations. Its brightness is low and the lack of local dimming really stands out during evening viewing. Therefore, we see the W85B more as a "daily" television — ideal for someone who watches terrestrial television, YouTube, or streaming in SDR, and wants to connect a console or PC at 120/144 Hz (but without HDR). In this role, it performs very well. Is it a television for everyone? Definitely not. But if we accept its limitations and approach it without high expectations, the W85B can provide a lot of enjoyment for relatively reasonable money.

The idea behind The One has hardly changed over the years and with the Philips PQS9001 this is both a strength and its biggest drawback. You still get a versatile mid-range television whose main distinguishing feature is Ambilight. The light that follows the picture can change the atmosphere of an evening viewing and for many people will be the main reason to buy it. It's easy to see why: once you like that effect, you often don't want to go back to watching without it. The picture quality itself is good, but a very similar level has been seen in this series in previous years. The VA panel delivers decent blacks, colours are nicely saturated and the brightness is sufficient for comfortable viewing in a typical living room. It's a pity, though, that Philips didn't take another step and at least implement some form of local dimming. In a dark room you can see a navy-black rather than true black, and HDR, though noticeable, is less impressive as a result. After so many years of The One on the market we'd expect more.

There is a clear step forward in Titan OS. Compared with last year, and especially the version from two years ago, the system has become much more pleasant to use. A few apps have been added, many small functions improved and the annoying bugs we complained about before have been fixed. Overall it runs respectably, although we're again bothered by a remote that has to be pointed at the television. Philips stubbornly sticks with infrared for basic control, even though voice control uses radio connectivity. That makes it harder to understand why radio wasn't also used for menu navigation. The One also has a lot to offer gamers. Four HDMI 2.1 ports and extensive features are one thing, but what impressed us most was the panel's response time. Our unit showed virtually no smearing, even on dark backgrounds, which is rare for LCD TVs with a VA panel. That deserves considerable praise. The ability to play in 4K at 144 Hz or in Full HD at 240 Hz further encourages connecting a PC. Unfortunately there's an unfinished element here too: Dolby Vision when gaming on Xbox incurs very high input lag.

The PQS9000 therefore leaves mixed impressions. It can surprise with excellent motion handling and shows that Philips has worked on the system, but the image quality lacks a similar step forward. This is a television we can recommend primarily to Ambilight fans. If that lighting is what convinces you to choose Philips, buying The One makes a lot of sense. It's worth checking, though, whether you can't find a Mini LED model with good local dimming at a similar price, which would offer deeper blacks and more striking HDR. Then you need to decide what matters more to you: the ambience created by Ambilight or better image quality itself.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Good
Stand type
Central
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.3/10

5.8/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,300:1

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,250:1

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,200:1

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,400:1

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

3,150:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,500:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,950:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,600:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,750:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,500:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The W85B is Panasonic's basic LCD, so one shouldn't expect miracles in this category, but… the VA panel does a really good job here. Its biggest advantage is simply better contrast than in popular IPS panels – there, blacks often look like grey, whereas here you can actually see deeper tones. In the scenes we tested, the contrast held around 4000:1, which translates to roughly four times better performance than in IPS. Of course, there's no local dimming, so in challenging conditions, when it gets really dark in the room, black can resemble navy more than absolute pitch black. This is exactly the difference you notice when comparing it to OLEDs or Mini-LEDs. But for everyday viewing – series, matches, films in the evening in the living room – this contrast is more than sufficient. The picture has the appropriate depth, and the W85B does not give the impression of a "faded" television.

Black levels and contrast on the Philips PQS9000 are decent for an LCD TV without local dimming. That's mainly thanks to the VA panel; in our film scenes contrast often exceeded 5000:1, and in weaker results dropped to around 4000:1. That delivers an image with quite good depth and a clear advantage over typical IPS panels, where blacks are much more prone to looking grey. Unfortunately that's basically where the panel's strengths end. The TV has no local dimming, so it can't dim dark areas separately while retaining strong highlights elsewhere on the screen. All it has is global dimming, which brightens or dims the entire backlight at once. In a completely dark room these limitations become apparent: blacks take on a dark navy hue, and shadowy scenes lack the depth of a good screen with local dimming. Fortunately Ambilight helps here. The light on the wall makes the on-screen blacks appear deeper and slightly masks the panel's glow. That doesn't change the TV's actual contrast, but it affects how our eyes perceive it. In this case Ambilight is therefore not just decorative, as it can also make evening viewing more pleasant.

HDR effect quality

4.2/10

5.5/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 95.6%, Bt.2020: 75.0%
DCI P3: 94.5%, Bt.2020: 75.5%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

228 nit

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

249 nit

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

283 nit

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

282 nit

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

297 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

449 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

467 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

487 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

486 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

507 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026)

Panasonic W85

Unfortunately, we do not have good news here. The Panasonic W85B is rather dim – its peak brightness does not exceed 300 nits, so it’s hard to talk about any true HDR effect. In practice, this means that scenes which can “shine” and make an impression on other screens simply look like ordinary SDR with a slight boost in colours here. Our measurements and film tests confirmed this – regardless of the content, the W85B will not extract anything more from HDR. Therefore, if someone is looking for a television specifically for HDR, it is better to look towards other models. As consolation, the fact remains that in terms of colours, the W85B performs quite well. It is a QLED television, so its colour gamut coverage is wide, and most films and series look natural, without a distinct “washed-out” effect. The colours are saturated, so in everyday viewing, there is no sense that something is strongly amiss.

Philips PQS9000 is a moderately bright TV. In our HDR scenes it reached roughly 450 to just over 500 nits. That's enough to notice a difference compared with SDR. Reflections of the sun, lamps or flares have a bit more sparkle than on basic TVs, whose brightness often tops out around 300 nits. However, it is not a level at which bright elements make a particularly strong impression. The biggest limitation remains contrast. Without local dimming, when the TV brightens a bright object it also raises the black level around it. There is therefore no clear separation of strong highlights from a dark background, and it is that contrast that can show what HDR can do. The PQS9000 offers more than the cheapest models, but despite decent brightness the effect remains fairly basic.

Colours

Philips deserves praise for the colours. Although the manufacturer calls this model QLED, in reality a PFS phosphor is used here instead of quantum dots. That choice does not prevent the TV from achieving good results. On both test patterns and in measurements of film scenes we recorded about 94% coverage of DCI-P3 and 75% of BT.2020. For this class of TV that is really good. In practice this means that the vast majority of colours used in HDR films and series will have appropriate saturation. Vibrant green or intense red are not much of an issue and add appeal to the picture. Limitations are easier to notice in some games and in rarer content that use the most saturated shades of the wide BT.2020 gamut. In such situations, displays with wider colour coverage, such as SQD or RGB LED, can show more. In its price bracket, however, the PQS9000 has nothing to be ashamed of.

Factory color reproduction

4.2/10

5.1/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

When testing the Panasonic W85B, we obviously started with Filmmaker mode, as this is today’s gold standard when it comes to watching content “as the director intended.” The problem is that this television is quite far from those intentions. The biggest issue turned out to be an excess of red – both in SDR and HDR. The image often appeared too warm because of this, and in some scenes, it was almost “blazing.” Additionally, there is the issue of brightness management. When we looked at the gamma or EOTF charts, it was clear as day that in most scenes, the television brightens the image more than it should. The effect was simply predictable. Details can get lost, there is flattening, and highlights are blown out across the entire screen. We know, of course, how to correct this, but it must be said honestly that it requires a lot of work during calibration. Out of the box, the W85B does not provide a picture close to reference – it is rather a television that will always interpret colours and brightness a little “in its own way” without professional adjustments. Unfortunately, this is to the viewer’s detriment.

Unfortunately, the factory picture settings for Film mode on the PQS9000 need refinement. In SDR the most noticeable problem is an excess of red in the white balance, which makes whites, greys and skin tones too warm, sometimes even slightly pinkish. On top of that the gamma runs below the reference across most of the range. The TV therefore brightens midtones and highlights, making the overall image look flatter than it should.

In HDR the white balance itself is much better. Apart from minor deviations the RGB components track closely, so there is no pronounced colour cast as in SDR. However, the EOTF curve shows a slight brightening of parts of the image, and the biggest issue appears in measurements of the wide colour gamut. Many hues deviate significantly from the target, with errors reaching levels of 8–9. The good gamut coverage we praised earlier therefore does not mean the TV hits specific colours equally well. It can display a wide colour range, but out of the box it does not use it very precisely.

Color reproduction after calibration

6.9/10

7.7/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Fortunately, calibration made a significant difference for the Panasonic W85B, particularly in SDR content. Here, the improvement was really noticeable – we managed to balance the whites and somewhat tame the tendency of the television to excessively brighten the entire image. The picture became more coherent, and the colours gained a naturalness that was lacking in the factory settings. Admittedly, the results from the Color Checker are not perfect, as the W85B has visible issues with green saturation, but overall, we evaluate the post-calibration effect in SDR very positively. The situation is a bit different with HDR. Here too, we managed to reduce the tendency to warm up the entire scene, so the image performed significantly better than in the factory settings. However, the same issue we mentioned earlier is still evident – the television interprets the image too much "on its own" and brightens the entire screen. The lack of local dimming only exacerbates this effect. In summary, briefly in SDR content, the W85B performs really well after calibration and is more than suitable for daily viewing. However, in HDR, even after adjustments, it remains difficult to unequivocally recommend it for serious viewing sessions.

Calibration brought a significant improvement, especially in SDR material. We managed to even out the white balance and remove the previous colour cast, and the Color Checker measurements now look really very good. Colours are much closer to what should be on screen, so with ordinary TV or SDR films we can be satisfied with the outcome. Unfortunately HDR somewhat spoils that result. On the one hand it is limited by the panel itself, because calibration won't improve contrast or replace local dimming. On the other hand there remain colour errors that we couldn't correct because the CMS settings, that is the colour management controls, were greyed out and inactive. That costs Philips points with us. The white balance can be fine‑tuned, but without access to wide‑gamut adjustments it's not possible to order HDR colours equally well. It's a shame, because the SDR results show the potential is there, but we weren't allowed to make full use of it everywhere.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.1/10

8.6/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

Here we can comfortably praise the Panasonic W85B. The television handles colour matching and tonal transitions remarkably well. Gradients appear smooth, without visible bands or artificial contours. As a result, the image gains a natural quality, and sequences with a large number of subtle shades – such as the sky or blurred backgrounds – look exceptionally good for this class of equipment.

The Philips PQS9000 handles tonal transitions very well. This is especially evident in dark scenes, where shades flow smoothly into one another without visible banding or distinct boundaries between colours. As a result, even on large, uniform areas the image looks smooth. Minor imperfections only appear in lighter tones, but you have to look closely to notice them. During normal viewing they are unlikely to distract from the film. In this category Philips performs really well.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
No
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

With native SDR content, the Panasonic W85B performs very well – tonal transitions are smooth and natural, without artificial bands or prominent contours. However, the situation is worse when it comes to lower resolution materials. It is precisely there that the television has the most difficulty with "enhancing" the image. The lack of any option in the menu that would allow for improving gradation means that with older films or materials from YouTube, one can sometimes notice slight issues with colour blending.

Fortunately, upscaling, or raising the quality of lower resolution content, performs much better. This is definitely a strong point of this model – the image is scaled cleanly and in detail, and the television handles this better than one might expect from such an inexpensive piece of equipment. This is thanks to the HCX processor, which Panasonic has been developing for years, and it is noticeable that even in the lower series it can do a good job.

Digital picture processing in the Philips PQS9000 performs well, though we have a few reservations. The "Distortion Reduction" function helps to smooth tonal transitions in lower-quality material, but it works rather unevenly. It can improve one part of the image, only to seem to lose its effect a moment later, still in the same scene, and show banding between shades again. A plus is that it doesn't remove film grain or fine noise, so the image retains its texture. We found the 'Medium' setting worked best and we recommend it. The upscaling to 4K itself is acceptable, although the image is very soft. Edges are heavily smoothed, which may leave some viewers feeling the picture lacks definition. In that case, it's worth slightly increasing the sharpness in the TV's menu, as this will make edges appear more defined. However, don't overdo the sharpening slider, otherwise artificial halos may appear instead of an improvement.

Blur and motion smoothness

6.5/10

8.1/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
77%
0%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur (1080p@240Hz):

At first glance, everything looks good – the Panasonic W85B has a 120 Hz panel and even a 144 Hz mode, so it seems that it should cope well with smooth motion. The problem arises when we look into the settings. The options for improving fluidity are supposedly present in the menu, but in practice… they don't change anything. No matter what we choose, the image looks the same. On top of that, there is a lack of BFI, or the black frame insertion mode, which on many televisions helps sharpen motion. And suddenly it turns out that despite the strong panel, the W85B offers us no real tools to adjust motion according to our needs. It’s only good when the source itself operates at a higher frequency – for example, games at 120 Hz. But when it comes to films or sports, we simply have to accept what the television shows us, because nothing more can be done about it.

In terms of motion handling the Philips PQS9000 performs exceptionally well for an LCD TV. It's not just the 144 Hz refresh rate, but above all how quickly the panel itself responds. At 120 Hz there are virtually no typical trailing smears behind moving objects. What is particularly pleasing is that this also applies to darker scenes, where many VA panels clearly struggle. Here motion remains clear and, in this respect, Philips pleasantly surprised us.

The "Motion Styles" feature lets you adjust how motion is displayed. It includes two sliders: "Smoothness" and "Blur Reduction", allowing you to tailor the effect to the content you're watching and your own preferences. Our suggested settings are shown in the photo. Treat them as a starting point and try to find the level of smoothing that suits you best.

Console compatibility and gaming features

8.5/10

9.5/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 240Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Warning Yes, high input lag
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

On paper, the Panasonic W85B looks really solid. It has two full HDMI 2.1 ports, support for ALLM, variable refresh rates, Dolby Vision in games, and of course, a high refresh rate of the panel itself. Additionally, it features Panasonic's characteristic game tools bar – a "game bar" that allows you to preview key parameters and quickly change them if needed with a single click. This sounds great, but the problem arises when we turn on HDR. Here, the W85B suffers significantly, as there is practically no HGiG implementation – the television poorly manages brightness, and instead of an accurate picture, we get scenes that are too bright, sometimes even blown out. The solution? The simplest one – turn off HDR in the console settings and leave everything in SDR. And this is where it gets really interesting, as in this scenario, the W85B shows its better side. Low input lag, high fluidity thanks to 120 Hz – all of this makes gaming look phenomenal. Indeed, HDR can be forgone, but if the priority is responsiveness and smooth gameplay, the W85B offers a lot of fun.

Gaming features

In terms of gaming features, the Philips PQS9000 has a lot to offer. Four HDMI 2.1 ports let you connect several devices without having to choose which one gets the full-capability port. Consoles can use 120 Hz at Full HD, 1440p and 4K, while a PC can also make use of 144 Hz at 4K or 240 Hz if you drop to Full HD. There's also VRR, which matches the refresh rate to the frame rate and prevents screen tearing. Its range is 48 to 240 Hz, with the upper limit applying in Full HD mode.

ALLM is present, so the TV automatically switches to game mode, and HGiG works properly, which is useful when setting HDR on a console. There's also a Game Bar for quick access to settings and signal information. The list even includes Dolby Vision gaming, but it's hard to enjoy this option because of very high input lag. Aside from that caveat, the feature set is really solid.

Input lag

9.8/10

7.2/10

SDR

1080p60
17 ms
32 ms
1080p120
8 ms
16 ms
2160p60
17 ms
32 ms
2160p120
8 ms
16 ms

HDR

2160p60
17 ms
32 ms
2160p120
8 ms
16 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
17 ms
213 ms
2160p120 DV
10 ms
106 ms

There is really nothing to worry about here. The Panasonic W85B responds instantly to our movements, and the values measured in tests can comfortably compete with monitors for gamers. At a 120 Hz signal, the input lag is around 8–10 ms, while at 60 Hz it hovers around 17–20 ms. In practice, this means one thing – no delays, no frustration! You press the button, and the action happens on the screen straight away.

Input lag is already less impressive than the gaming features themselves. At 60 Hz we measured 32 ms, both in SDR and HDR. That result is fine for more relaxed games, but in fast-paced shooters you can feel a slight lag. At 120 Hz the delay drops to 16 ms and gaming is noticeably more enjoyable, though the competition can respond even faster.

The biggest problem appears when Dolby Vision is enabled. At 60 Hz the delay is as much as 213 ms, and at 120 Hz it reaches 106 ms. The response to controller input is then clearly delayed, which seriously disrupts gameplay. Therefore, on the PQS9000 it is definitely better to stick with HDR10. Dolby Vision is supported for games, but its practical usefulness remains limited.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Average
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
8ms
16ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

The Panasonic W85B performs surprisingly well as a computer monitor. It is perfectly suited for office work – the fonts are sharp and very readable thanks to full chroma 4:4:4 support, so you can easily write, browse pages, or work on spreadsheets. But the real fun begins when gaming. The television handles refresh rates of up to 144 Hz for PC without any issues, and it also supports popular image synchronisation technologies such as NVIDIA G-Sync and AMD FreeSync. This means we don't have to worry about screen tearing or stuttering – gameplay is smooth and looks simply fantastic.

The PQS9000 scores highly for PC compatibility, mainly thanks to its gaming capabilities. A 144 Hz refresh rate at 4K and support for G-Sync Compatible and AMD FreeSync Premium Pro allow frame-rate synchronisation on compatible NVIDIA and AMD cards. Working with text is also good. Regular fonts are sharp and legible, and thanks to proper 4:4:4 chroma handling coloured letters, icons and small desktop elements retain their clarity. The main reservation concerns very small, dark text: the horizontal strokes of letters are noticeably darker than the verticals, which makes some characters look uneven. You probably won't notice this from the sofa, but if someone plans to put The One on a desk and work up close, this flaw may become annoying.

Viewing angles

3.2/10

3.2/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
77%
68%

Here you can see the biggest price we pay for the high quality of the VA matrix contrast. The W85B, like most televisions with this type of panel, does not perform very well when viewed from a wider angle. Colours lose intensity and the image begins to fade as soon as we move away from the screen's axis. This is not a flaw of Panasonic itself, but rather a characteristic of VA technology – excellent contrast in exchange for poorer viewing angles. So if you plan to watch films with a larger group and often sit "off to the side," you need to keep this in mind.

Viewing angles are one of the weakest points of the Philips PQS9001. Simply moving to the side is enough for the colours to lose saturation noticeably, and for the picture to look washed out and less contrasty. When watching with several people, seats directly in front of the screen will therefore be by far the best.

Unfortunately this is a typical characteristic of VA panels, where good contrast when viewed head-on comes at the cost of poorer off-axis performance. Most TVs with such a panel suffer the same problem and The One is no exception. The swivelling stand helps a little, allowing you to angle the screen towards the viewer, but it won't solve the issue when seats are widely spaced.

Daytime performance

4.2/10

6.1/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026): 502 cd/m2

Panasonic W85: 263 cd/m2

The Panasonic W85B features a satin-finish panel that performs quite well in reducing reflections and maintaining colours even under strong light from windows or lamps. There is no "mirror" effect here, so watching television in a typical living room during the day is comfortable. However, the problem arises in really bright rooms – the television does not have high brightness, so it cannot compete with very strong sunlight. It is simply a screen that performs best in controlled conditions.

The Philips PQS9001 performs quite well for daytime viewing. The main advantage is a stable brightness of around 500 nits, regardless of how many bright elements appear on the screen. Even when watching winter sports or a scene full of white, the image does not dim. In a typical living room that level is more than enough to watch television comfortably without having to draw the curtains.

The satin finish does a decent job of suppressing reflections, though it does not eliminate them completely. A window opposite the screen will be visible and can be distracting, especially in darker scenes. Black holds up well in daylight, so the picture does not become overly washed out. For everyday viewing, it's therefore quite good, as long as the sun is not shining directly on the screen.

Panel details

Backlight Type
QLED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
Fire OS 8.1.4.6 (RS8146/3057
TPM267E_V167.002.054.151
Image processor
MT5896

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Panasonic W85 TV Panel details
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV Panel details

Panasonic W85

Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026)

TV features

6.8/10

7.6/10

  • System
    Amazon FireTV
    Titan OS
  • System performance
    Average
    Decent
  • HDMI inputs
    1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    Yes
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Panasonic W85 TV features
Review Panasonic W85 TV features
Review Panasonic W85 TV features
Review Panasonic W85 TV features
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV features
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV features
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV features
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    Yes
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    No
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

SmartTV: FireTV

The W85B runs on the Fire TV system, and it must be said – it is a significant step forward compared to Panasonic's previous proprietary solutions. Here, we have support for AirPlay, screen mirroring, and even voice control through Alexa. It sounds modern, and in practice, it does provide a lot of capabilities. The problem is that in Europe, Fire TV still looks a bit like a “guest with luggage.” It works decently, but there are occasional micro-hiccups, the interface doesn't always respond as smoothly as we would like, and in the menu, one can encounter awkward translations. This is not yet at the level of the big players like Google TV or even Tizen, but it is still an improvement compared to what Panasonic had previously. The worst part, however, is that the Fire TV application library is quite modest, and this is its biggest drawback.

Classic Television Functions

In terms of typical television functionalities, it is quite good – we have a classic remote control with a full numeric keypad, a clear EPG guide, and the possibility to record programmes from the built-in tuner to an external USB drive (e.g. a flash drive). The downside is the lack of the option to schedule recordings in advance – you can only record “here and now,” but not set recordings for later.

Titan OS in this year’s The One shows that Philips has worked on its system. Compared with last year’s version many small details and functions that previously did not behave as they should have been fixed. Now you can use AirPlay without problems, stream the picture from a computer via Miracast or search for something by voice in Polish. The system itself runs decently, though it is certainly not among the fastest. The app library has also grown, with Netflix, Prime Video, Disney+, CANAL+, Apple TV and YouTube available. The selection is still smaller than on Google TV, but when using popular services Titan gives fewer reasons to complain. Everyday convenience has improved in the basic features as well. You can connect Bluetooth headphones and listen through them at the same time as the TV’s speakers, and there is a mode that lets you switch the screen off and leave only the audio playing. USB recording and picture-in-picture (PiP) are missing. What’s most disappointing is the remote — despite its backlit buttons it still controls the TV via infrared, so you have to point it at the screen. The system has gained many useful tweaks, but that part of the operation has stayed the same and can be irritating in daily use.

Apps

7.6/10

7.2/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
No
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
No
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
No
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

3.1/10

8.6/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
No
6 Mpix
Yes
No
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The biggest downside of the built-in player with Fire TV is the lack of support for external text subtitles. If you have your own film library and use text files, you simply won't be able to display them on this television. The player itself handles basic video formats, but if someone wants to fully utilise files from USB, they will likely end up installing an additional application from the store (e.g. VLC).

The built-in USB player works quickly and smoothly and handles most of the files we tested without a problem. Music playback is good, from popular MP3s to FLAC files, including 96 kHz/24-bit. It's perfectly adequate for everyday playback of media from a USB stick. However, our main reservations again concern photo handling. The player is rather selective about image resolution: it opened our 8, 16 and 32 MP files, but failed with, among others, 4, 12 and 24 MP files. It's hard to see the logic in that when a larger photo works but a smaller one doesn't. That can be irritating when browsing holiday photos.

Sound

5.8/10

6.9/10

  • Maximum volume
    87dB
    96dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

Here, the Panasonic W85B unfortunately has nothing to boast about. The speakers sound flat and rather “plastic”, so there’s definitely no talk of cinema experiences here. There’s no depth, there’s no clear bass – just basic sound that’s merely meant to “exist”. It’s a shame because we thought that the external subwoofer used here would actually make a difference. Unfortunately, we were mistaken. The only advantage is that the television can play really loudly. This may appeal to older users who often need higher volumes to comfortably watch programmes or news. It’s sufficient for everyday TV watching, but if someone is thinking about films and games – an additional soundbar or audio system is practically a must.

The Philips PQS9001 has a 2.0 audio system with a total power output of 40 W, which is two 10 W drivers on each side. It performs quite well and noticeably better than most budget TVs. There's plenty of volume, but the sound itself lacks depth. The biggest issue is the lack of low bass, so explosions in films and the heavier parts of music don't have the proper weight.

Higher frequencies aren't reproduced evenly either. Measurements show a clear dip around 2 kHz, a boost at 6-7 kHz and a drop above roughly 8 kHz. This can emphasise sibilant consonants and give the sound an edge, despite the roll-off of the highest treble. It's adequate for everyday viewing, but for films and music it's worth considering additional audio equipment, all the more so given that the TV supports surround sound formats, including Dolby Atmos and DTS. A compatible soundbar or AV receiver will make better use of those formats than the built-in speakers.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

87dBC (Max)

75dBC

96dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy