Samsung U8000F (VA) vs LG QNED80A6A (IPS)

Direct comparison

U8000F / U8092F

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”50”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 43”65”86”

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.6

5.9

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.7

    5.7

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.9

    5.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.9

    5.5

  • Gaming on console

    6.6

    6.8

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.0

    5.0

  • Watching in bright light

    3.8

    4.7

  • Utility functions

    5.3

    6.8

  • Apps

    8.7

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    5.7

    6.0

Advantages

  • Great blacks and contrast (VA panel version)

  • Advanced Smart system: Tizen

  • Excellent for text work - displays fonts beautifully

  • Basic features for gamers - VRR and ALLM

  • Low input lag

  • Wide viewing angles – the image looks just as good from any spot on the couch

  • Rich and vibrant colours thanks to the PFS filter (QNED)

  • Smooth and modern WebOS 25 system

  • Magic remote (with cursor)

  • Good detail reproduction in HDR

  • Effective upscaling and toning smoothing feature

  • Low input lag

  • Decent features for gamers (VRR, ALLM, HGiG), despite the 60Hz panel

  • Smooth tonal transitions – no visible "stepping" on colour gradients

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness

  • Worse viewing angles than the version with an IPS panel (Obvious, isn't it? 😉)

  • Infrared remote

  • Inferior appearance compared to its predecessor

  • Poor contrast and greyish black – the IPS panel does not perform well in low light

  • Problematic local dimming – vertical backlight bands are very noticeable on dark backgrounds

  • 60Hz panel

  • No Dolby Vision support

  • Sound lacks depth – a soundbar is recommended

Our verdict

Samsung U8000F with a VA panel is a television that can pleasantly surprise in its class – of course, if we know what to expect from it. The greatest strength of this variant is definitely the quality of blacks. Compared to the version with an IPS panel, the difference is huge – the image gains depth, contrast looks significantly better, and evening movie sessions no longer resemble watching content through a grey filter. For a device from the budget segment, this is really a nice surprise. Additionally, we have the proven Tizen system, which not only runs smoothly but also offers access to a full range of applications, support for SmartThings, and voice assistant (via an app). The PC mode and console connection work flawlessly – fonts are clear and readable. Plus, there are basic features for gamers, such as VRR and ALLM, which – although they won’t turn this television into an esports machine – are perfectly adequate for occasional gaming.

Of course, like any construction in this budget, the U8000F with a VA panel also has its limitations. Viewing angles are not its strong suit – watching the image from the side reveals a drop in quality. However, it’s hard to regard this as a serious drawback – because you gain some advantages elsewhere. Better blacks always come with a bit less flexibility in setting. When it comes to HDR, we have a rather symbolic approach – the brightness is too low to talk about a true “wow” effect, and the color palette is limited. But let's face it – that’s not the reason you buy such a television. So if you’re planning to purchase the U8000F, we definitely recommend opting for the variant with the VA panel. It’s still a very basic model, but in this version, it offers more than you might expect – especially in terms of black quality. And in this price range, that’s quite a lot.

The QNED80A variant based on an IPS panel is aimed at a completely different audience. If you're looking for a TV for a place where life buzzes all day, and family members watch TV from various spots – this will be a good choice. The wide viewing angles and saturated colours make the picture look good, whether you're sitting directly in front or at the dining table. Of course, it's not perfect equipment, as there simply aren't any in this price segment. The IPS panel won't offer you inky blacks, so evening horror movie sessions may appear slightly grey, and local dimming in dark scenes can create noticeable light bands. Despite these flaws, the QNED80A makes up for it with its overall picture quality. The performance of the processor deserves immense praise – both upscaling regular TV to 4K and presenting details in HDR content are outstanding here. The image is clean, sharp, and rich in detail, even if the screen itself doesn't break brightness records. Combined with the fantastic WebOS system, which runs quickly and reliably, it's a very safe, solid choice for everyday family entertainment at a relatively low price.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Good
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Black
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
No
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.3/10

2.7/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 6 (1 x 6)

Contrast:

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,600:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,150:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,900:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,750:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,400:1

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

2,400:1

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,350:1

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

2,450:1

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,200:1

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,150:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

It’s worth noting that the test concerns variants with a VA panel, which perform several times better in the categories of black levels and contrast than the 55-inch version equipped with an IPS panel. Thanks to the higher native contrast (although it’s not the top result among VA panels), the tested scenes looked significantly better – without noticeable greyish hues or the typical washed-out shadow effect found in IPS panels. The black levels in the U8092F model can be considered really good and satisfying, especially in this price range. Of course, this is not a design equipped with local dimming, so it’s hard to expect spectacular results in very challenging scenes. On the other hand, we’re talking about a remarkably budget-friendly television that performs quite solidly in its category.

If you come across a model equipped with an IPS panel, the situation changes dramatically and we won't beat around the bush – the contrast is simply weak. This is a natural characteristic of this technology, which pales in comparison to VA panels. The blacks, especially during evening screenings with the lights off, are rarely pitch black – more often they lean towards dark grey or navy hues. However, the real problem in this variant is the way the local dimming system operates. Since we are dealing with edge-lit backlighting on a panel that naturally "leaks" more light, this system often does more harm than good. When a bright object appears on a dark background, the TV tries to boost its brightness by activating the relevant zone. The effect? Instead of pinpoint light, we see illuminated vertical bars stretching across the entire screen. Unfortunately, this looks worse than in the VA version. Due to the lower native contrast of the panel, these "light bars" (so-called blooming) are much more visible and stand out more against the background. In many cases, these brightness jumps are so aggressive that instead of enjoying the screening, we focus on the backlighting's performance.

HDR effect quality

3.1/10

4.8/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 79.1%, Bt.2020: 58.5%
DCI P3: 91.3%, Bt.2020: 66.5%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

212 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

173 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

265 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

90 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

369 nit

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

325 nit

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

434 nit

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

342 nit

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

318 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

LG QNED80A6A (IPS)

Samsung U8000F (VA)

While the U8000F with its VA panel can still be praised for decent blacks, there are no such accolades when it comes to brightness—particularly in HDR scenes. The television only achieves a maximum of just under 250 nits, which is simply too low to talk about any impressive light effects. Bright elements appear washed out, and scenes that should shine look rather flat. An interesting situation occurred during our testing of a scene from the movie Sicario 2— the screen noticeably darkened, as if the television was trying to hide its limitations in displaying blacks. One might get the impression that the device artificially darkens the image to improve contrast, but in practice, the effect doesn't make much difference, apart from the fact that we see less on the screen. Additionally, there’s the issue of colours—the U8000F doesn’t support a wide colour gamut, so one shouldn’t expect vibrant, saturated hues known from better models. The HDR image here resembles a slightly brightened SDR and... maybe that’s not such a bad thing. For this model, it’s not worth expecting a cinematic experience—better to treat HDR as a modest addition.

When it comes to image dynamics and brightness, the QNED80A keeps its feet firmly on the ground. It’s not a "light beast" – during our measurements, peak luminance hovered around 350-400 nits. To put it bluntly: these are values that won't fully unleash the potential of HDR formats. So don’t expect the glare of the sun or car headlights in films to blind you. However, this television has a powerful ace up its sleeve that saves the overall image quality – it's the colours. LG engineers have employed an advanced filtration system (technically based on phosphor PFS, marketed as QNED/NanoCell), which does a fantastic job. Thanks to this, despite average brightness, the screen can generate exceptionally saturated and pure colours. Our instruments showed coverage of the wide cinematic DCI-P3 colour gamut at around 93-94%. This is a result that outclasses most standard LCD televisions. In practice, this means that when watching 4K HDR content, the image – although not very bright – is very vivid, lively, and delights the eye with its depth of colours.

Factory color reproduction

6.5/10

4.4/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

Samsung U8000F has been tested by us in the best picture mode it offers out of the box – that is, Filmmaker Mode. This profile is supposed to theoretically provide a neutral, cinematic image, free of unnecessary enhancements and artificial beautifications. In the case of SDR content – mainly in HD or SD resolution – the television already presented itself surprisingly reasonably right out of the box. The only noticeable imperfection was brightness management. The gamma chart showed some deviations – slight brightening or dimming of certain tones – but in practice, this did not significantly affect the viewing experience. For a television in this segment, it performs quite well.

However, the situation in HDR mode looks significantly weaker. Although white balance was still acceptable, colour errors were very evident. In the Color Checker test, almost every sample was outside the target point, and the image itself appeared unnatural – colours were skewed, sometimes too cool, and at other times simply dull and lifeless. The main issue lies in hardware limitations – the U8000F does not support the wide colour gamut of DCI-P3, so it is physically unable to reproduce the colours that the HDR standard intends. Unfortunately, this is evident in almost every more demanding scene.

Here, regardless of whether you come across the VA or IPS version, the situation looks identical. LG engineers have once again served us their vision of a "gaming look," which unfortunately has little to do with accuracy. When switching to a console, the white balance automatically shifts to very cold regions. The image is dominated by blue, making it seem artificially sharpened, and the white is so aggressive that it almost burns out. This creates an effect we associate with garish retail modes – everything is meant to shine and scream "I’m digital." While some may like this, we must say it bluntly: it is not an accurate image. If you care about naturalness, we suggest you immediately check the settings and change the colour temperature to a warmer one.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.5/10

7.4/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Right out of the box, the U8000F offered a pretty decent picture in SDR for its price range. We managed to tweak it a bit further – we reduced a slight purple tint and improved the gamma characteristics, giving it a more natural curve. Despite these adjustments, the TV still has a tendency to overly brighten the brightest details – the gamma chart shows a clear break that cannot be fully corrected.

On the other hand, in HDR mode, it’s noticeably weaker. It's hard to talk about any significant improvement – despite attempts to fine-tune the settings, the picture still presents considerable colour errors. A Delta E exceeding 7 indicates noticeable deviations that we couldn’t effectively reduce. Unfortunately, this is a limitation of the construction itself – the U8000F simply wasn't designed for serious HDR. In daily SDR viewing, it performs quite well, but for HDR content... it’s best not to have overly high expectations.

After professional calibration, the QNED80A in the IPS version has changed beyond recognition, especially with "ordinary" content (SDR). We managed to eliminate the greenish tint and calm down the overly bright gamma. In classic television or older games, colour errors (DeltaE) have fallen below the threshold of perception (value < 2). The image is now coherent, natural, and truly pleasing to the eye. The situation is somewhat more complicated in HDR mode. Although the colours are now in place, the TV struggles with perfect brightness control (EOTF curve). Due to the limitations of edge lighting and the rather poor adjustment options provided by LG in this area, the TV's software at times "does what it wants" just to mask the imperfections of black and contrast. However, this is not a cause for concern – despite these technical limitations, the image after calibration is a class above what you saw out of the box.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.5/10

9.2/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

One of the essential elements affecting the perception of the image is the way in which the television handles tonal transitions – that is, blending colours and shades without clear boundaries. In the case of the Samsung U8092F model, this performed really well. On the test screens, we did not observe any visible banding or disturbances in the colour gradients. The image retains a natural character, without excessive digital interference, which unfortunately tends to be the norm in this class of equipment. Minimal imperfections appeared in very bright sections, but they are practically unnoticed and do not affect the daily use of the television.

Another very strong point of this model is the way it handles tonal transitions. Often in cheaper LCD designs, we see so-called banding – a situation where the television fails to smoothly display a gradient, creating visible "steps" between shades. In the case of the QNED80A, the engineers did their homework. Whether we're watching a blue sky, fog, or dark scenes full of greys, the transitions between colours are incredibly smooth and soft. There are no artificial cuts or jagged edges of colours here. This makes the image very cohesive and natural, which is not at all a standard in this price segment.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

When it comes to how the Samsung U8000F handles lower-quality materials, we have to admit that Samsung has made progress compared to its predecessor from last year – the DU7192 model, which theoretically occupies the same place in the lineup. This year’s model is equipped with a feature that improves the smoothness of tonal transitions, which has been implemented much better than last year. Yes, the television still uses quite strong algorithms that can distort details or remove film grain, but still – it can be confidently said that it works effectively. However, not everything has gone perfectly. The U8000F has noticeable issues with slight image stuttering when watching very old content in very low resolution. If someone plans to play their old VHS tape, they must be prepared for the image to look slightly “choppy”.

It often happens that cheap 4K TVs mercilessly expose the flaws of low-resolution materials. Here, it's different. The QNED80A is great equipment for watching content that isn’t perfect. The processor does a great job of scaling the image, making even older recordings look quite decent on the 4K screen – they are consistent and free of digital noise. Interestingly, there’s a gradation reduction feature available in the settings. It’s particularly effective in combating what is known as banding in low-bitrate materials. Of course, you need to approach it with some caution. Due to the lower processing power of the chip (in comparison to the premium series), turning on this option can sometimes result in unwanted artifacts or blurring. Despite this risk, we encourage experimentation, as in many cases this feature can save a viewing of low quality.

Blur and motion smoothness

4/10

4.6/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
-
No
Brightness drop with BFI
47%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (Upłynniacz ruchu 4K@60Hz):

Blur ():

The Samsung U8000F comes with a 60 Hz panel, so right from the start, it's clear that you can't expect miracles. It's simply the standard in this class – sufficient for everyday viewing, but without any fireworks. The TV offers one motion smoothing slider – a function called "Motion Blur Reduction", which allows us to adjust the smoothness of the image in films. Higher settings provide a more "theatrical" and smoothed effect, while lower settings maintain the original character of the film with a slight 24p effect. Interestingly, there is the "LED Clear Motion" feature, or BFI mode – which inserts black frames between the frames of the image to improve motion sharpness. However, in practice, the screen flickers significantly when this is activated, and it's best to treat this as more of an experiment rather than something that genuinely improves the gaming experience.

When it comes to motion reproduction, the QNED80 unfortunately has a bit of a disadvantage. The TV is built on a 60Hz refresh rate panel, which is quite disappointing for the QNED series in 2025. If you're looking for perfect sharpness in dynamic football matches, you might feel a bit let down. The solution in this situation is the TruMotion system. It allows for artificially adding frames, which smooths out the picture in movies and TV shows. In the menu, you'll find a De-Judder slider – we recommend setting it to a value of 2, 3, or 4. This is the "golden mean" that improves fluidity without turning the film into a soap opera.

Console compatibility and gaming features

5.3/10

6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    No
    Yes

[UPDATE] We have updated our 2025 Samsung TV reviews following the release of firmware version 1131, which officially restores the essential HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) support.

Samsung U8000F offers a basic set of features for gamers, which can still prove sufficient for less demanding users. Here we have an automatic gaming mode – when a game is launched on the console, the TV switches to low-latency mode by itself, significantly improving response time. We also find the VRR feature, or variable refresh rate, which operates in the range of 48 to 60 Hz. This means that both Xbox and PS5 will not produce the 'tearing' effect on the screen – as long as we stay within this range.

Unfortunately, that's about it when it comes to advantages. Add-ons like Game Bar or higher refresh rates are reserved for higher models of Samsung from the 2025 line. In theory, the TV also supports the HGiG feature, which should adjust the HDR image to the intentions of game developers. Unfortunately – despite this feature appearing in advertising brochures and store materials – its setup on the Xbox console turned out, in practice, to be... impossible.

In the gaming section, we won't be pulling the wool over your eyes – the QNED80A is not e-sports equipment. The lack of 120Hz signal support is a fact to accept. However, LG's engineers have done everything to squeeze the maximum potential out of this 60Hz panel, providing gamers with a desirable set of features. Above all, the TV supports VRR (in the range of 48-60Hz) and ALLM. This means the image is smooth and doesn't stutter, and the TV automatically switches to low latency mode as soon as you grab the controller. Accessing these options is ridiculously easy thanks to the dedicated system overlay – Game Dashboard. It's also worth appreciating the support for the HGiG format. This is a nod to owners of modern consoles. Even though the screen doesn't support gaming Dolby Vision, HGiG ensures that the TV "understands" how to display games in HDR. This helps avoid the effect of blown-out clouds, which is unfortunately a plague on cheaper LCD TVs.

Input lag

10/10

9.8/10

SDR

1080p60
11 ms
15 ms
1080p120
2160p60
11 ms
15 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
11 ms
15 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

The Samsung U8092F performed phenomenally in our input lag tests. Regardless of the resolution, the results were very low, which is truly impressive for this price segment. One can confidently say that gaming on this TV will not cause frustration due to significant delays between what we do on the controller and what we see on the screen. For most gamers, even the more demanding ones, this result should be more than satisfactory.

And what about responsiveness? Our measurements showed an input lag of around 15 ms. In the gaming world, where top monitors can go down to 1 ms, this might seem like an average result, but in the category of living room TVs, it's a very good outcome. In practice, this means that when playing on a console, you won't feel any discomfort. There's no situation where the character reacts with a noticeable delay after pressing a button on the controller. The TV responds to the controller without delay, allowing you to enjoy gameplay without unnecessary irritation. For casual gaming after work – the result is quite acceptable.

Compatibility with PC

6/10

5/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Average
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
11ms
15ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGB
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Working on the computer with this television is a true pleasure. The Samsung U8092F supports chroma 4:4:4, and even though it has a VA panel, the readability of text is very, very good. The television is also suitable for occasional PC gaming, mainly due to its low input lag. However, it should be noted that the G-Sync feature does not work on this model, which is strange because VRR worked without issue on the console.

In terms of collaboration with a PC, we have another surprise in store. Theoretically, it's the IPS panels that should dominate the display of static office content due to their pixel structure. Meanwhile, the QNED80A breaks the mould once again. During testing, we noticed some odd behaviour when displaying text. While classic, bold fonts are readable and look correct, the challenges arise with small, thin letters. They tend to "split" on the contours and cast a strange shadow. This makes small text less clear, and over extended periods, it can be tiring on the eyes. So if you're looking for a television that will mainly be used for displaying tables in Excel or Word documents, this particular model may disappoint you a bit.

Viewing angles

3.7/10

6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
67%
69%

Remember how we complained about the lower contrast? Now it's time for a comeback. It's in terms of viewing angles that the IPS panel shows its superiority and reason for existence. If you have a spacious lounge and family members watch TV from different spots – for example, from an armchair in the corner or over the dining table – this variant will be spot on. Unlike VA panels, here the image retains its properties even at a large angle. Colours remain vibrant, not changing shades when viewed from the side. This makes the QNED80A in this version an excellent choice for watching matches with mates or cartoons with the kids, where not everyone has the luxury of sitting directly in front of the screen.

Daytime performance

3.8/10

4.7/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Panel brightness

LG QNED80A6A (IPS): 310 cd/m2

Samsung U8000F (VA): 204 cd/m2

Thanks to the satin finish of the Samsung U8092F panel, it handles reflection reduction quite well. The screen doesn't act like a mirror, and the colours – given the capabilities of this class of device – remain fairly saturated, even in somewhat brighter conditions. Unfortunately, the finish alone won't perform miracles. The TV is simply too dark to effectively cut through very challenging lighting conditions. If we place it opposite a light source (e.g. a large window or a strong lamp) – unfortunately, one must reckon with the fact that not everything will be clearly visible on it.

QNED80A is not a "light monster," so in full, direct sunlight, the picture may appear a bit washed out. It is not equipment designed to combat sharp sunlight hitting directly on the screen. However, it has an ace up its sleeve that significantly improves user comfort: the matrix coating. Instead of a cheap, glossy finish, LG has used a satin structure here. It works very effectively, "softening" reflections from the surroundings. We don’t see our perfect reflection in the screen like in a mirror, which can be incredibly annoying in darker scenes. So for extremely bright rooms, this may be insufficient, but in standard, moderate home conditions, the QNED80A will perform perfectly.

Panel details

Backlight Type
White LED
Mini-LED PFS LED
Software version during testing
1064
33.21.62
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV Panel details
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV Panel details

TV features

5.3/10

6.8/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV features
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV features
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV features
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV features

Samsung U8092F – like all this year's models from this brand – runs on the Tizen operating system. The system itself is really well developed: we have access to many applications (although not all), a well-developed smart home support, and various extras, including exclusive Samsung applications. There are also features like AirPlay and Chromecast, which allow us to easily connect our phone to the television and stream multimedia.

Unfortunately, as this is Samsung's cheapest series in 2025, the manufacturer decided not to include a solar remote. In the package, we find a classic infrared remote, which visually resembles the newer version, but unfortunately lacks voice functions. As for typical “television” extras – the recording function and the PiP (picture in picture) mode are missing. However, a plus is the HDMI eARC, which allows for easy control of the included remote for devices like a decoder or soundbar – and it does indeed work seamlessly.

WebOS Platform and Support

One of the biggest advantages of the QNED80A model is its "brain," which is the operating system. LG has implemented a fully-fledged WebOS version for 2025, which in terms of smoothness and usability is on par with more expensive models. Apps launch smoothly, and navigating the menu is a pure pleasure. This is all thanks to the unique remote control with a pointer (cursor) function, which has undergone a visual redesign this year. The manufacturer has opted for minimalism – the new "Magic" is significantly smaller and more ergonomic. It fits perfectly in the hand, but this change also has a downside. The physical number pad has disappeared from the casing. For younger users, accustomed to streaming, this is no problem, but older household members who are used to entering channel numbers from memory will have to change their habits.

Daily Use and Features

In terms of features that we would call "classic," the QNED80A adheres to a tried-and-true standard. It is not a multimedia machine that will surprise you with any exotic additions, but it performs flawlessly in everyday television tasks. The handling of traditional television, including Teletext, is correct and trouble-free. The wireless communication also deserves praise – the Bluetooth module works reliably, allowing for quick connection to a game controller or wireless speakers. This is a television that simply "works" – stably, predictably, and without unnecessary complications.

Apps

8.7/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.3/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

Samsung U8092F handles playback of files fairly smoothly – the television supports most popular audio and video formats. Of course, it doesn't support Dolby Vision, but we simply won't find that in any Samsung model.

Some reservations can be made about the support for external text files – those that the user would like to add as subtitles to the film. During our tests, the television only played TXT files, and other formats, such as SRT or SUB, unfortunately did not work. This may not be a problem for everyone, but it's worth knowing. Perhaps it is an issue to be improved in the future with a software update for the television.

Many of us still enjoy watching films or photos from our own USB drives. Here, the QNED80A performs quite well, supporting a wide range of audio and video codecs. Most film libraries should start "straight away." However, it's important to remember the specifics of the WebOS system. As it is a closed environment, we are limited to what the manufacturer has provided for us – there is no option to install alternative players (like the popular VLC) if we encounter a read error. And what errors might we encounter? Primarily the lack of support for HEIC files. So, if you take photos with your iPhone and want to display them on the big screen straight from a USB drive – the TV won't recognise them. It’s worth changing the photo format to JPG on your phone right away. We also noticed that the player has difficulties processing very large graphic files. Photos with resolutions of around 20-28 Mpix may not load or may cause errors. Aside from these exceptions – the operation is seamless.

Sound

5.7/10

6/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

U8092F doesn't pretend to have a home theatre on board. We get a standard set of 2 x 10 W, which sounds fine but without much emotion, though with a light bass. For everyday viewing, such an audio setup is more than sufficient. We were pleasantly surprised that it managed to play a film with the built-in Dolby Atmos codec (JOC) – although, of course, we're not talking about true surround sound here.

When it comes to sound, the QNED80A fits into the market standard for the mid-range. We have a classic 2.0 setup with a power of 20 watts. We won't hide it – physics cannot be fooled. The sound lacks low tones (bass) and that specific depth that builds the atmosphere in action movies or while listening to music. However, the television has one significant advantage that users of traditional television, such as series and news programmes, will appreciate. It is the reproduction of speech. The dialogues are surprisingly clear and natural. The sound is not "bass-heavy" or artificially boosted, which means it doesn't strain the ear and allows you to understand every word of the narrator without the need to turn up the volume.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

No acoustic data