Samsung S90H (WOLED) vs LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED)

Direct comparison

S90H / S92H / HAE / HAT

Info

C6 / C64 / C6E / C6H / C61

Info

Available screen sizes: 42”48”55”65”83”

Available screen sizes: 77”83”

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

8.4

8.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    8.6

    8.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    8.8

    8.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    8.5

    8.6

  • Gaming on console

    9.7

    9.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    6.5

    7.6

  • Utility functions

    7.3

    8.4

  • Apps

    9.3

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    8.4

    7.0

Advantages

  • Perfect blacks and infinite contrast (OLED)

  • Very high HDR brightness (up to 1400 nits)

  • Effective anti-reflective coating (Matte, Glare Free)

  • Excellent colour accuracy after calibration

  • Great motion handling (no motion blur)

  • Excellent for gamers (4× HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, low input lag)

  • Game Motion Plus feature

  • Refresh rate up to 165 Hz

  • Wide viewing angles

  • Fast, fully featured Tizen

  • Good sound

  • Outstanding brightness, over 2,000 nits in HDR

  • Perfect blacks and OLED contrast

  • Excellent picture quality for HDR films and Dolby Vision

  • Very good image processing and upscaling

  • 165 Hz panel and practically zero motion blur

  • Great gaming package: VRR, G-Sync, HGiG, Dolby Vision Gaming

  • Very low input lag, approx. 5 ms at 120 Hz

  • Wider colour gamut than other WOLED screens, 99% DCI-P3 and around 83% BT.2020

  • Intuitive, modern webOS

  • Convenient control with the Magic remote featuring a gyroscope

Disadvantages

No like

- In bright light colours lose some depth (a characteristic of matte coatings) - Lack of TV features such as USB recording or picture-in-picture (PiP) - No support for DTS:X (an issue for Blu-ray disc fans) - Reduced colour saturation compared with the QD-OLED variant

  • Strong dithering and image flicker in near-black areas

  • Various remote versions across C6 variants, so before buying it's hard to be sure which Magic Remote will be included

  • Average handling of reflections; in a very bright living room strong reflections may be noticeable

  • No DTS:X support. For that format you'll need an external AV receiver or player

Our verdict

Samsung S90H is a TV that simply makes a brilliant impression. The combination of OLED’s absolute black, high brightness and excellent motion clarity produces a picture that’s hard to look away from. And that’s exactly what you expect from a good OLED TV. The matte anti-reflective coating also works very well. Reflections on a sunny day become less of an issue, and thanks to the standard polariser blacks don’t shift as much toward greyish-maroon tones as they do on QD-OLED. Add a snappy Tizen, an excellent set of gaming features led by Game Motion Plus, and surprisingly good, full-bodied sound from the built-in speakers. Any weaknesses? Of course. Tone transitions aren’t quite as perfect as on QD-OLED, and viewing angles remain slightly worse. In practice these are minor points, especially since WOLED also has its own advantages, particularly in a bright room where it preserves black levels and colour saturation better. Overall, QD-OLED still comes out a bit ahead, but this time the difference isn’t as pronounced as it was a year ago. For most people this won’t be a deciding factor when choosing a TV. So our advice is this: instead of obsessing over panel type, pick the size that best fits your room. Whether you buy the WOLED or QD-OLED version, you’ll get a mature, versatile and very well-balanced TV. As every year, the S90H series holds a top spot among the best-value OLEDs of 2026.

The C6H is an even more interesting TV because the use of a Tandem OLED panel means the C series is moving into territory previously reserved for far more expensive models. You still get all the benefits of the regular C6, but the panel’s capabilities are on a completely different level. HDR illustrates this best. In many scenes we measured around 2000 nits, and at times even 2300 nits — results previously seen only in flagship TV ranges. On top of that there’s a wider BT.2020 gamut and, above all, much stronger colours at high brightness. In that respect it’s hard to call this a typical mid-range OLED. What’s more, the rest of the TV keeps up with the panel. You get excellent image processing, 165 Hz, a full suite of gaming features and the convenient webOS with the Magic Remote. If we judged the C6H solely on its capabilities and specs, it could easily sit alongside much more expensive top-tier TVs.

Unfortunately the magic fades a little when evening comes and you want to watch a film on it. Around black our C6H sample showed noticeable dithering and annoying flicker. It was most visible in challenging, very dark scenes and it’s the kind of fault that’s hard to ignore on an OLED. After all, one of the reasons you buy a panel like this is to enjoy perfect blacks during evening viewing. It’s a pity because otherwise the C6H is a genuinely terrific TV. Everything also suggests this isn’t a limitation of the panel itself but a firmware issue, similar to what we also saw in the LG G6. We therefore hope LG will fix it with an update, as it has done on some overseas markets. For now, this single issue prevents us from fully recommending the C6H. Until LG fixes it, the safer choice is the regular C6 or a rival OLED that doesn’t suffer from this near-black behaviour. If an update does resolve the problem, the Tandem-equipped C6 will immediately become one of the most interesting OLEDs of 2026.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
IR (remote)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Premium
Stand type
Central
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Silver
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

10/10

10/10

Contrast:

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

As the Samsung S90H uses an organic display, it deserves the highest possible rating for contrast and blacks. This applies to both variants on the market: the WOLED model we tested and the QD-OLED version. Because each pixel is an independent light source and can switch completely off, the TV delivers absolutely perfect black and infinite contrast. In practice that translates into brilliant image depth and perfectly sharp separation of bright details from a dark background. Any haloing (blooming), which still affects even top Mini LED-backlit LCD TVs, is completely absent here. The true magic of the WOLED panel is most evident during evening viewing in a darkened room; the dark areas of the picture gain remarkable texture, impressive three-dimensionality and a wealth of details hidden in the shadows.

The Tandem OLED panel gives the C6 clearly greater capabilities in several areas of the picture, but when it comes to black levels there was nothing that needed changing. As with any OLED, individual pixels can be completely switched off, allowing the TV to achieve perfect black and virtually infinite contrast. So it doesn't matter whether bright subtitles on a black background, tiny stars or small light sources appear on the screen. You won't see the halo typical of LCDs around them, and transitions between bright and dark areas are very precise. In terms of pure black the Tandem OLED version has no advantage over the standard C6, because both panels can switch pixels off with single-pixel precision. Differences between them only show up in brightness and colour. However, if we look solely at contrast and black level, both variants offer the same reference performance.

NOTE: In the helicopter scene from the film Sicario 2 we noticed graininess and flicker in the darkest parts of the image. It looks like a software bug that LG should fix with an update. In the Tandem OLED version the effect is even more noticeable, and we observed similar behaviour in the flagship LG G6 as well.

HDR effect quality

7.7/10

8.8/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 99.4%, Bt.2020: 75.9%
DCI P3: 99.4%, Bt.2020: 93.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1374 nit

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1419 nit

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1570 nit

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1395 nit

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

713 nit

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

2133 nit

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1900 nit

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

2300 nit

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1964 nit

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1648 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED)

Samsung S90H (WOLED)

Luminance of RGB colors

Luminance of RGB colors

The Samsung S90H in the WOLED variant is still an exceptionally bright TV for its price bracket, although it is slightly dimmer compared with the QD-OLED version. That difference is not as pronounced as in last year’s F series, where gaps sometimes reached 500 nits. Here the parameters of both panels are very similar, with differences in peak brightness of only about 100–150 nits. In small-window measurements the S90H with the WOLED panel easily reaches close to 1,500 nits. That headroom lets it phenomenally convey the dynamics of HDR effects — blooms, light reflections and explosions have the right punch, exactly as intended by the studio creators. As with most OLED displays, when a very bright scene fills the entire screen, panel protection systems kick in and brightness naturally falls to around 700 nits. It’s worth stressing that this is still an excellent result on the market, often noticeably better than many Mini LED screens in the same segment.

Colour gamut coverage

The biggest difference between the two S90H variants lies in colour reproduction and saturation. This stems directly from the different construction of the WOLED panel, which uses an additional white subpixel. As a result, very high-brightness colours don’t achieve quite the same saturation, and the wide-colour volume is slightly more limited than with QD-OLED. That said, in everyday use these differences will be hard for most viewers to notice. Our measured DCI-P3 coverage on the WOLED panel reaches almost 99%, meaning that for the vast majority of real film scenes both variants will present an almost identical image. The real gap only appears in rarer, especially demanding productions that use the ultra-wide BT.2020 gamut. Because of the WOLED panel’s construction, coverage of that standard is roughly 15% lower compared with the S90HAT with a QD-OLED panel, so the brightest, heavily lit HDR colours may appear a touch less vivid.

And the biggest advantage of the Tandem OLED panel is most obvious with HDR. The C6H's brightness is simply very high and, in our measurements across most film scenes, hovered around 1,900 to 2,300 nits. That's the kind of level at which bright highlights, the sun or small light sources can look truly spectacular. The scene that impressed us most was the fifth scene from the film The Meg. It's particularly demanding for OLEDs because almost the entire screen is extremely bright. Even so, the C6H reached about 1,650 nits in that scene. By comparison, the standard C6 with a classic WOLED panel managed roughly 600 to 700 nits at the same point. So we're talking about more than double the brightness, and in places the difference approaches three times as much. And that's probably the best example of what Tandem OLED delivers. It's not just a higher score on a small test window. The C6H can maintain very high brightness even when much more of the screen is illuminated. That gives HDR a much wider dynamic range, and in this respect the C6H is considerably closer to flagship OLEDs than to typical mid-range models.

Colours

Tandem OLED also brings improvements in colour. DCI-P3 coverage remains virtually complete at around 99%, while in the much wider BT.2020 colour space we measured about 82–83%. That's roughly 7 percentage points more than the standard C6. In everyday viewing this won't be a difference you notice in every scene, because most films don't use such a wide palette. However, when very highly saturated colours appear, the C6H has noticeably greater capability, especially with reds. Reds benefit the most, becoming deeper and more saturated. It's still not at the level of the best QD-OLED panels or SQD TVs, but for a WOLED panel the result is really very good.

Factory color reproduction

7.6/10

7.8/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

In Filmmaker mode, which we strongly recommend switching on straight out of the box, the S90H offers very good factory colour tuning. Colours are natural and faithful to the creators' intent, without the annoying oversaturation seen in more aggressive profiles. However, as is often the case without full calibration, there is unit-to-unit variation. In our test the white balance was a little deficient in the blue component, so the image leaned slightly towards warmer, yellowish tones. This was most noticeable in bright scenes, such as the snowy sequences from Star Wars. Additionally, the gamma curve was slightly low at around 2.2, which caused a small lift in shadow detail. In HDR mode the tuning was a bit better, showing only a slight undersaturation in the red region.

Right out of the box the LG C6 is pretty well set up, especially if you select Filmmaker mode. In SDR content the white balance is good, although as brightness increases it starts to lack red slightly. This makes the picture a bit cooler, but not enough to be very noticeable during normal viewing. More is going on in the luminance response. Gamma is a bit low and instead of holding at 2.4 it sits closer to 2.1–2.2 across a large part of the range. In practice the C6 slightly brightens midtones. Shadows are therefore more readable, but the image loses a little depth compared with how it should look in a dark room.

In HDR the situation is a bit more interesting. The start of the grayscale looks very good, but from around 20–30% brightness the white balance starts to drift more strongly. As brightness increases red builds up and blue becomes noticeably lacking. In the brightest parts the difference is already significant and also affects the reproduction of some colours. The EOTF curve itself is handled quite well across most of the range. The C6 only has a tendency to slightly brighten the picture, which we've already seen in our film comparisons. The biggest deviation appears around the brightest sections where the TV starts to adapt the signal to the panel's capabilities.

So the factory Filmmaker setting in HDR is not perfect, but overall performs well. The biggest room for improvement is the white balance, especially at high brightness.

Color reproduction after calibration

9.2/10

9.1/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After full calibration, you can safely say the S90H in the WOLED version looks almost perfect. In SDR mode colour errors fall to ultra-low levels and Delta E values very rarely exceed 2. That's a phenomenal result, so if perfectly faithful colour reproduction matters to you, it's definitely worth getting it calibrated. The calibrated HDR mode also performs very well, where the white balance was stabilised and previous deviations eliminated. After professional tuning it's really hard to fault anything, because the TV delivers an image with almost exemplary naturalness and three-dimensionality. The slightly lower score in this category compared with the QD-OLED variant is solely due to the saturation limitation in extremely bright scenes, while the tuning potential and colour fidelity are at the highest level.

LG TVs have long responded very well to calibration, and the C6 is no exception. After adjustment, the white balance was set almost perfectly, and most colour errors fell to values below 3, often around 2. In practice this means very accurate colour reproduction in both SDR and HDR. An interesting detail only showed up with the HDR luminance response. On a classic EOTF chart everything looks almost perfect and at first glance it would be hard to fault. Only when we measured the TV’s behaviour using filters based on real film scenes did it emerge that the C6 has a slight tendency to artificially boost image brightness.

It isn’t a huge difference and many people may even see it as a positive, since HDR looks a bit more punchy. From the point of view of fidelity to the source material it’s not ideal, though — some scenes are simply a touch brighter than the filmmaker intended. Interestingly, this is quite atypical for LG. In previous generations, this brand’s TVs usually stuck very closely to the reference picture characteristics after calibration. With the C6 we’re still very close to the standard, but that subtle boost in brightness can indeed be noticed in movies and TV shows.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8/10

5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The smoothness of tonal transitions is at a very solid level here, and the WOLED panel variant has been noticeably improved compared with last year’s F-series model. Troublesome gradient artefacts and visible banding occur much less often. Despite this clear improvement, it still does not reach the level of QD-OLED technology. In almost every direct comparison the QD-OLED panel handles smooth transitions between shades a little more precisely. In summary, when it comes to gradients the WOLED panel is clearly better than earlier generations of these panels, but the QD-OLED variant still holds a noticeable advantage in this area.

In terms of tonal transitions alone, the C6H performs really well. Gradients are smooth, colours don't break into obvious banding and, in both bright and dark scenes, it's hard to find major posterisation issues. For most content the image looks very clean in this respect.

Note: The situation is much worse, however, when it comes to dithering around black. In very dark parts of the image you can notice distinct flicker and graininess that, at close viewing distances, can be quite pronounced. On the Tandem OLED panel version the effect is noticeably stronger than on the regular C6. That's a shame, because the tonal transitions themselves are at a very high level here. It's precisely the behaviour of the image just above black that is the main reason we can't rate this category higher.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

8.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

When it comes to banding reduction itself, Samsung has kept the same solutions known from last year’s models. The dedicated gradient-smoothing function works quite well and can effectively mask unwanted tonal transitions, which can be useful on a WOLED panel that’s somewhat more prone to banding. However, it’s important to remember it acts aggressively. This mechanism, aside from the artefacts themselves, can remove fine film grain and subtly soften detail. Ultimately it’s a trade-off, but if you want perfectly faithful image reproduction, it’s safer to leave this option off.

There’s also no breakthrough in scaling. The S90H uses the same NQ4 Gen3 processor as its predecessor, so upscaling quality was almost identical. The chip sharpens lower-resolution material very well, pulling a satisfying level of detail out of it. However, Samsung still hasn’t solved the old overscan problem. For some older recordings or archival footage the edges of the image can be slightly cropped. It’s a minor drawback, but it’s a shame the manufacturer still hasn’t fixed it.

Here the LG C6 has taken a really big step forward. The TV uses the same processor found in the flagship G6, and in terms of image processing the two models are very similar. That's a big plus, because in this area LG's processor this year performs excellently. The 'Smooth Gradation' function works especially well. With heavily compressed material it can effectively hide unsightly tonal banding and artefacts that often appear, for example, in lower-quality streaming. It's best left on the 'Low' setting. That way the improvement is clear, and the TV doesn't yet start to blur fine details. Higher levels smooth the picture more, but can begin to remove some of the natural texture of objects on screen. Upscaling itself also performs very well. Lower-resolution content is properly sharpened, edges look clean, and the processor quite effectively reconstructs fine details. In this respect the C6 is already really close to LG's top TVs and the differences compared with the G6 are small.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.5/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
165Hz
165Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
50%
48%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@165Hz ):

Blur (4K@165Hz):

When it comes to motion handling the S90H is simply excellent. This year's panel offers its refresh rate boosted to 165 Hz, although in practice the benefit will mainly be for gamers connecting a powerful PC. For movies, TV series or sports broadcasts such a high refresh rate makes no difference and the picture looks exactly the same as at the standard 120 Hz. Regardless of the source, the OLED panel's lightning-fast response time does the job. Motion is clean, and the ghosting or smearing seen on LCDs simply doesn't occur here.

The C6H with a Tandem OLED panel can also run at a refresh rate of up to 165 Hz. PC gamers will get the most out of that, of course, because with consoles, films or sport we're still looking at a maximum of 120 Hz. The panel itself performs excellently in motion. OLED pixels respond almost instantly, so even with fast-moving objects you don't see the usual trailing. The picture stays clean both when watching sport and in fast-paced games.

If you prioritise smoothness over motion clarity, TruMotion is available. LG lets you adjust two parameters separately. De-Judder mainly works with films and series shot at 24 fps and reduces their characteristic judder. De-Blur is intended for 50/60 fps content, so it's mainly useful when watching sport or TV.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.6/10

10/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 165Hz
    40 - 165Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Gamers should feel right at home with the S90H, because Samsung has left few reasons to complain in this area. The TV has four HDMI 2.1 ports, each supporting VRR, ALLM and high refresh rates. There's also the Game Bar, a handy menu that lets you quickly check key parameters and change settings without leaving the game. Importantly, Samsung has also improved HGiG. In last year's models it could cause issues when used with a console, but on the S90H it now works as it should. What really stands out against the competition is Game Motion Plus. It's a specialised motion-smoothing mode for games that works best with titles running at 30 or 60 frames per second. Motion becomes noticeably smoother and latency remains at a reasonable level. In our measurements it was under 50 ms, so gaming is still comfortable. That's important, because on many TVs enabling a similar smoothing feature causes such a big increase in input lag that controls become noticeably sluggish. Samsung has managed to find a good compromise here. There's still no Dolby Vision Gaming, but in practice Game Motion Plus may prove to be the more useful feature.

The C6H offers virtually a full gaming feature set. On consoles you can easily use 4K at 120 Hz, while PC users can push the refresh rate up to 165 Hz. The TV also supports VRR from 40 to 165 Hz, ALLM and a correct implementation of HGiG. Dolby Vision is available in game mode too, which remains a big plus for Xbox owners. All the key info can be seen in the Game Bar, which provides quick access to VRR settings and the current signal parameters. The tandem OLED doesn’t change the actual feature set for gamers, but with such high panel brightness HDR games can look even more impressive. Functionally, the C6H is simply a very complete TV for consoles and PC.

Input lag

10/10

9.9/10

SDR

1080p60
10 ms
14 ms
1080p120
6 ms
5 ms
2160p60
10 ms
14 ms
2160p120
6 ms
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
10 ms
14 ms
2160p120
5 ms
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
22 ms
2160p120 DV
14 ms

Input lag is another aspect that's hard to fault. At 120 Hz we measured just about 5 to 6 ms, which is truly outstanding. Switching to even higher refresh rates, the delay fell to astronomically low levels, practically imperceptible during gameplay. The Samsung S90H delivers top-tier results.

The C6’s input lag is what you’d expect from a good gaming TV. At 120 Hz we measured about 5 ms, so controller input feels practically instantaneous. At 60 Hz the figure rises to roughly 14 ms, but that’s still a good result. Latency is a bit higher in Dolby Vision: about 14 ms at 120 Hz and roughly 22 ms at 60 Hz. In practice, if you’re playing on an Xbox, it’s unlikely to be something that will actually bother you.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
6ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RWGB
RWBG
Max refresh rate
165Hz
165Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

The S90H works very well as a large-format monitor for PC, and not just because of its comprehensive gaming features. NVIDIA G-Sync certification, low input lag and support for refresh rates up to 165 Hz mean it runs smoothly with typical gaming PCs. In terms of motion and image sharpness in PC games it’s hard to find fault. The situation is a little different for everyday office work, web browsing or text editing. Although fonts remain legible, the specific subpixel structure of the WOLED panel (with an additional white subpixel) can be noticeable. When sitting very close to the screen, letter edges and small interface elements can show slight coloured fringing or appear a bit softened. This is characteristic of WOLED panels. In practice, however, it’s not a major issue. We tested the 65-inch variant, which is naturally used from about a metre or more. From that distance the effect practically disappears and doesn’t interfere with daily work. It may be more noticeable in the smallest sizes, like 42 or 48 inches, which often sit on a desk and are used from a distance of a few dozen centimetres.

The C6H with a Tandem OLED panel also works very well as a computer monitor. When working with text the most important thing is that the TV correctly handles 4:4:4 chroma subsampling, so small fonts, icons and UI elements are displayed clearly. The only thing you might notice from very close up are faint coloured fringes caused by the unusual subpixel layout. From a normal viewing distance on a screen this large it practically doesn’t matter, and in everyday use text is very readable. The C6H performs even better when the computer is used for gaming. The TV can run at refresh rates up to 165 Hz, supports G-Sync and VRR, and input lag at the maximum refresh rate is about 5 ms. Combined with the very fast response time of the OLED panel this makes for excellent conditions for PC gaming. There’s no smearing, motion is very smooth and controls respond almost instantly. In this respect the C6H can easily be treated not just as a TV but as a very large gaming monitor. You just need to remember that at 77 or 83 inches setting up your desk sensibly can be quite a challenge. 😉

Viewing angles

7.6/10

7.3/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
31%
30%

Viewing angles on the Samsung S90H are very good and among the best on the market. That's thanks to the OLED panel, which when viewed from the side does not lose brightness or colour saturation as quickly as many LCD TVs. The picture therefore keeps its proper appearance for longer, which matters especially when watching TV in a larger group and not everyone is sitting directly in front of the screen. Only at a really large angle can you notice the advantage of QD-OLED panels. In their case viewing angles are practically perfect, while with the WOLED version the colours and brightness then start to change slightly.

The C6H with a Tandem OLED panel also offers very wide viewing angles. You can watch the TV well from far off to the side and the picture still maintains high contrast and saturated colours. As you'd expect from an OLED, it's one of those screens where you don't have to fight for the exact middle spot on the couch. Only TVs with QD-OLED panels from Samsung Display actually perform better in this regard. The C6H's slightly lower rating comes from our sample having a bit more tendency to shift towards a greenish tint when viewed at very extreme angles. It's a subtle difference we noticed mainly in direct side-by-side comparisons. During normal viewing, most people probably won't notice it.

Daytime performance

6.5/10

7.6/10

Panel finish
Matte
Glare
Reflection suppression
Very Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED): 690 cd/m2

Samsung S90H (WOLED): 473 cd/m2

There is, however, one area where the S90H with a WOLED panel performs better than the QD-OLED version. It's viewing in a brightly sunlit room. Thanks to the presence of a traditional polariser, blacks here don't shift toward grey or a dark burgundy as much as they do on QD-OLED panels. Combined with the new matte coating, this delivers very good results. The picture retains more depth even in strong light, and colours don't lose their vibrancy so quickly. That doesn't mean the screen remains completely black in every condition. Under very strong illumination you can notice a faint purple tint typical of WOLED panels. In the S90H it is partly muted by the matte coating and isn't as obvious. Ultimately both variants perform similarly in this category. WOLED handles black retention in a bright room better, but on the other hand it achieves slightly lower SDR brightness. At times the difference compared with the QD-OLED version can reach around 150 nits.

The version with a Tandem OLED panel performs noticeably better during the day. The screen coating behaves very similarly, it’s glossy, suppresses reflections quite well and holds black levels with the lights on. A strong window or lamp will still be visible on the screen, but the image doesn’t lose much of its depth because of it. The biggest difference here is, of course, brightness. In typical SDR content the C6H reaches around 690 nits, which is clearly more than the standard C6. In a bright living room you can really notice it — the picture has more punch and cuts through the light entering the room much better.

Tandem OLED also handles scenes with lots of bright elements on screen better, although brightness still drops with near-full white. So they haven’t completely eliminated one of OLEDs’ typical traits, but the limitation is much less severe here. If the TV will often be used in a bright living room, this is one of the C6H’s advantages over the regular C6 that you’ll actually notice day to day.

Panel details

Backlight Type
WRGB OLED
WRGB TANDEM OLED
Software version during testing
T-RSMHDEUC-0100-120 4.3, E4601200, BT - G. albo 1204
43.11.73
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV Panel details
Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) TV Panel details

Samsung S90H (WOLED)

LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED)

TV features

7.3/10

8.4/10

  • System
    Tizen
    WebOS
  • System performance
    Very good
    Very good
  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    IR (remote)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV features
Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) TV features
Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) TV features
Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) TV features
Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    No
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    No
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Classic TV

With regular cable or terrestrial TV, Samsung doesn't offer any revolutions compared with last year's model. Putting the marketing AI features to one side, you simply get a solid, traditional package: a full set of tuners, a CI slot for a conditional-access module (CAM), teletext and a convenient RF remote that doesn't need to be pointed directly at the screen. The problem is that the competition offers exactly the same today, and the S90H adds nothing in this area. What's more, the S90 series has lost the PIP function, picture-in-picture. If you liked keeping an eye on the news in the corner of the screen while watching another programme, you can't do that here.

Smart TV: Tizen

While there are few novelties for traditional TV, Tizen for 2026 performs really well. The main point is that the system runs incredibly smoothly and responds to commands without hesitation. Any animation stutter or lag when navigating menus has disappeared. Although it's Samsung's proprietary platform rather than the Google TV many prefer, the app library is complete and includes all the major VOD services. Cloud-gaming fans will also be pleased, as the gaming section has been thoroughly polished. For everyday Smart TV use, it's an exceptionally fast and mature environment.

Smart TV: webOS

No matter which C6 version you get, the feature set stays the same. The heart of the TV is, of course, webOS, the system LG has been developing for many years. It runs fast, is well optimized, and above all offers access to virtually all popular apps. Netflix, Disney+, Prime Video, YouTube, Max and other streaming services — in this respect it's hard to find significant gaps. The system itself also provides a lot of extra options. There’s AirPlay, easy screen casting from a smartphone, smart home device control, and the ability to personalize the home screen. LG has been expanding webOS heavily for several generations, and at times the number of available tabs or recommendations can be a bit overwhelming, especially with background ads, but once you get used to it the system is convenient and, most importantly, runs smoothly.

Classic TV features

The C6 also performs very well when you want to use it like a regular TV, not just a screen for Netflix. Over-the-air TV reception, the program guide and channel switching work smoothly and there’s little to complain about. LG still offers the ability to record programs to USB, so in terms of classic features the set is really well equipped. There are really only two things missing. The first is PiP, the ability to display two video sources at the same time. The second is a backlight for the remote, which would be handy for evening viewing. Apart from that, the C6 has basically everything you’d expect from a modern TV.

Magic Remote: DIFFERENT VERSIONS

When buying the C6, it’s worth paying attention to the remote, because LG has created some confusion here. During our tests we had, among others, the C64 variant commonly found in large retail chains. The package included the new, much smaller Magic Remote Slim. It has fewer buttons and looks much more modern, but it still retains two of LG remotes’ most characteristic features: the scroll wheel and cursor control by moving the remote. The C6E we tested came with the older, larger Magic Remote. It works basically the same, but it has a traditional numeric keypad and many more physical buttons. It looks less modern, but some people, especially those used to classic remotes, may find it more convenient. So there’s no single answer as to which remote is better. The new one is smaller, simpler and more contemporary, while the older one gives faster access to a larger number of functions without navigating menus. It’s worth knowing that depending on the C6 designation, the box may contain either variant.

Apps

9.3/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

9.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player handles most popular video, audio and photo formats without any problems. The range of supported files is broad enough that the inability to install external apps like VLC isn't an issue at all. However, we encountered one serious bug when trying to open HEIC photos from an iPhone. The TV not only failed to display the files, it caused Tizen to completely freeze. The system stopped responding to the remote and we had to unplug it. This is a clear software bug that Samsung should patch as soon as possible in the next firmware update.

During our tests the TV handled virtually all of the popular video formats we put on a USB stick without any problems. There were no issues with high bitrates, subtitles or more demanding files, so it's hard to find anything to criticise in that respect. The only exception was material with a DTS audio track. That's not surprising, as the TV simply doesn't support that codec. Aside from that, the player is good enough that most users will easily get by without installing external apps or connecting an additional player.

Sound

8.4/10

7/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    88dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Theoretically, the audio specification in the S90 series has been unchanged for several years. We still get a 2.1 setup with a total power of 40 W, so before testing we assumed that noticeably better sound would mainly concern the largest variants. Yet the 65-inch model we tested sounded noticeably better than its predecessors. The sound is fuller, more dynamic and has more "body" than the dry technical specs would suggest. We don't know whether Samsung changed the speakers themselves or if the improvement mainly comes from better tuning and software optimisation, but the effect is audible from the first moments. For such a slim TV the S90H performs really well and for many people may be sufficient even without a soundbar. Our only real gripe is the lack of DTS:X support, which is unfortunately disappearing from TVs more and more. There is Dolby Atmos, though, so streaming service users are unlikely to notice much of a problem. Those who mainly use Blu-ray discs may be left wanting, since DTS tracks still appear quite often on them.

* In the review we used the S90H variant. The S92H is also available for sale, equipped with two additional 20 W drivers. That gives a 2.1.2 configuration with a total power of 60 W, so you can expect stronger, more spacious sound. We can't confirm this, however, as we didn't have the opportunity to test that version.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

88dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy