PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) vs LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED)

Direct comparison

The One 2025 / PUS9060 / PUS9010 / PUS9000

Info

C6 / C64 / C6E / C6H / C61

Info

Available screen sizes: 75”

Available screen sizes: 77”83”

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.5

8.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.9

    8.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.6

    8.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.7

    8.6

  • Gaming on console

    8.1

    9.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.9

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    5.4

    7.6

  • Utility functions

    6.1

    8.4

  • Apps

    6.7

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    6.6

    7.0

Advantages

  • Very good viewing angles thanks to the IPS panel

  • Great PC compatibility, 144 Hz mode, proper support for G-Sync and FreeSync

  • Wide range of features for gamers, variable refresh rate, automatic gaming mode, HGiG

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including HDR10+ and Dolby Vision

  • Support for Dolby Atmos

  • Low input lag

  • Effective P5 image processor for lower quality content

  • Ambilight system

  • Backlit remote

  • Outstanding brightness, over 2,000 nits in HDR

  • Perfect blacks and OLED contrast

  • Excellent picture quality for HDR films and Dolby Vision

  • Very good image processing and upscaling

  • 165 Hz panel and practically zero motion blur

  • Great gaming package: VRR, G-Sync, HGiG, Dolby Vision Gaming

  • Very low input lag, approx. 5 ms at 120 Hz

  • Wider colour gamut than other WOLED screens, 99% DCI-P3 and around 83% BT.2020

  • Intuitive, modern webOS

  • Convenient control with the Magic remote featuring a gyroscope

Disadvantages

No like
  • Poor blacks and contrast (typical for IPS panels)

  • Clearly lower brightness than in the VA panel variant

  • Visible backlight bleed at the edges of the screen in the tested unit

  • Limited number of applications in the Titan OS system

  • The remote is still infrared, requiring aiming at the screen

  • Strong dithering and image flicker in near-black areas

  • Various remote versions across C6 variants, so before buying it's hard to be sure which Magic Remote will be included

  • Average handling of reflections; in a very bright living room strong reflections may be noticeable

  • No DTS:X support. For that format you'll need an external AV receiver or player

Our verdict

Philips PUS9010 (The One 2025) in the 75-inch version with an IPS panel is a TV that clearly shows the differences arising from the panel used. Compared to the VA panel variant, it offers significantly better viewing angles, very good compatibility with consoles, and excellent text readability, but at the same time, it loses out on black levels and maximum brightness. This model is best suited for everyday use, gaming, and in larger living rooms where not everyone is sitting perfectly in front of the screen. The TV performs very well in terms of responsiveness and features for gamers, offering 144 Hz, low input lag, and full support for variable refresh rates. An additional advantage remains Ambilight, which, especially in the evening, can enhance the viewing experience and partly mask the weaker black levels of the IPS panel. After calibration, the picture appears consistent and natural, and the differences compared to the VA version in color reproduction become hard to detect. On the other hand, it must be stated clearly that those focused on cinematic sessions in complete darkness may be disappointed. The poor black levels and boosted brightness due to the quality of our unit means that this variant of the PUS9060 performs worse than the same model with a VA panel. Philips PUS9010 IPS is generally a sensible choice for users looking for a large, modern TV for gaming, PC, and everyday watching with very good viewing angles. However, if deep blacks and better picture quality are a priority, it’s worth considering other variants or a higher class of equipment, as often for a small extra charge, you can get a TV equipped with mini-LED technology.

The C6H is an even more interesting TV because the use of a Tandem OLED panel means the C series is moving into territory previously reserved for far more expensive models. You still get all the benefits of the regular C6, but the panel’s capabilities are on a completely different level. HDR illustrates this best. In many scenes we measured around 2000 nits, and at times even 2300 nits — results previously seen only in flagship TV ranges. On top of that there’s a wider BT.2020 gamut and, above all, much stronger colours at high brightness. In that respect it’s hard to call this a typical mid-range OLED. What’s more, the rest of the TV keeps up with the panel. You get excellent image processing, 165 Hz, a full suite of gaming features and the convenient webOS with the Magic Remote. If we judged the C6H solely on its capabilities and specs, it could easily sit alongside much more expensive top-tier TVs.

Unfortunately the magic fades a little when evening comes and you want to watch a film on it. Around black our C6H sample showed noticeable dithering and annoying flicker. It was most visible in challenging, very dark scenes and it’s the kind of fault that’s hard to ignore on an OLED. After all, one of the reasons you buy a panel like this is to enjoy perfect blacks during evening viewing. It’s a pity because otherwise the C6H is a genuinely terrific TV. Everything also suggests this isn’t a limitation of the panel itself but a firmware issue, similar to what we also saw in the LG G6. We therefore hope LG will fix it with an update, as it has done on some overseas markets. For now, this single issue prevents us from fully recommending the C6H. Until LG fixes it, the safer choice is the regular C6 or a rival OLED that doesn’t suffer from this near-black behaviour. If an update does resolve the problem, the Tandem-equipped C6 will immediately become one of the most interesting OLEDs of 2026.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Toslink (Optical audio)
IR (remote)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 1Gbit
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Premium
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Silver
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

2.9/10

10/10

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,300:1

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,400:1

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,450:1

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,500:1

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,350:1

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

In the 75-inch version of the Philips PUS9010 that we tested, an IPS panel has been used, which is immediately evident in the black levels and contrast category. Compared to the 55-inch variant with a VA panel that we tested earlier, the difference is noticeable right from the first screens. The black is shallower, and in a dark room, the display clearly falls into greys. The TV is not equipped with local dimming, so when the lights are out, dark scenes lose depth. In practice, the picture looks distinctly worse than in the smaller 55-inch variant, especially during movie viewings in the evening. The situation is somewhat salvaged by Ambilight. The rear lighting can subtly "deceive" the eye, enhancing the perceived contrast and making the black appear a bit deeper. It’s a simple trick, but it works. That’s why this model is definitely better watched with Ambilight turned on. It doesn’t have to be a multi-coloured mode tracking the image. Even a solid white backlight can improve the perception of dark scenes.

The Tandem OLED panel gives the C6 clearly greater capabilities in several areas of the picture, but when it comes to black levels there was nothing that needed changing. As with any OLED, individual pixels can be completely switched off, allowing the TV to achieve perfect black and virtually infinite contrast. So it doesn't matter whether bright subtitles on a black background, tiny stars or small light sources appear on the screen. You won't see the halo typical of LCDs around them, and transitions between bright and dark areas are very precise. In terms of pure black the Tandem OLED version has no advantage over the standard C6, because both panels can switch pixels off with single-pixel precision. Differences between them only show up in brightness and colour. However, if we look solely at contrast and black level, both variants offer the same reference performance.

NOTE: In the helicopter scene from the film Sicario 2 we noticed graininess and flicker in the darkest parts of the image. It looks like a software bug that LG should fix with an update. In the Tandem OLED version the effect is even more noticeable, and we observed similar behaviour in the flagship LG G6 as well.

HDR effect quality

5.2/10

8.8/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 90.6%, Bt.2020: 66.9%
DCI P3: 99.4%, Bt.2020: 93.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

374 nit

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

383 nit

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

397 nit

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

391 nit

Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

401 nit

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

2133 nit

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1900 nit

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

2300 nit

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1964 nit

Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1648 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED)

PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS)

Luminance of RGB colors

In the Philips PUS9010 version with an IPS panel, the HDR brightness sadly performs worse than in the previously tested 55-inch variant with a VA panel. The difference reaches about 100 nits, which is noticeably significant given the relatively low values. While the VA version could exceed 500 nits, here the maximum brightness reaches around 400 nits. This level still allows for watching movies and series in HDR, especially on streaming platforms, but the effects are clearly more subdued. Bright elements don't have the same impact, and scenes requiring high luminance are less impressive. On the plus side, the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour gamut is commendable. The IPS version offers about 91%, which is roughly 5% more than the variant with a VA panel. This translates into slightly better colour saturation in HDR content, despite the lower brightness. Colours can appear more vivid and cohesive, especially in colourful scenes.

And the biggest advantage of the Tandem OLED panel is most obvious with HDR. The C6H's brightness is simply very high and, in our measurements across most film scenes, hovered around 1,900 to 2,300 nits. That's the kind of level at which bright highlights, the sun or small light sources can look truly spectacular. The scene that impressed us most was the fifth scene from the film The Meg. It's particularly demanding for OLEDs because almost the entire screen is extremely bright. Even so, the C6H reached about 1,650 nits in that scene. By comparison, the standard C6 with a classic WOLED panel managed roughly 600 to 700 nits at the same point. So we're talking about more than double the brightness, and in places the difference approaches three times as much. And that's probably the best example of what Tandem OLED delivers. It's not just a higher score on a small test window. The C6H can maintain very high brightness even when much more of the screen is illuminated. That gives HDR a much wider dynamic range, and in this respect the C6H is considerably closer to flagship OLEDs than to typical mid-range models.

Colours

Tandem OLED also brings improvements in colour. DCI-P3 coverage remains virtually complete at around 99%, while in the much wider BT.2020 colour space we measured about 82–83%. That's roughly 7 percentage points more than the standard C6. In everyday viewing this won't be a difference you notice in every scene, because most films don't use such a wide palette. However, when very highly saturated colours appear, the C6H has noticeably greater capability, especially with reds. Reds benefit the most, becoming deeper and more saturated. It's still not at the level of the best QD-OLED panels or SQD TVs, but for a WOLED panel the result is really very good.

Factory color reproduction

5.9/10

7.8/10

We evaluated colour reproduction, as always, on factory settings, focusing on the movie mode, which in the case of Philips usually offers the best starting point. This is also a good moment to show how much the same model of TV can vary depending on the panel used. Looking at the white balance, the overall tendency remains similar to the version with the VA panel. There is still excessive red in the whites, however, in the tested unit with the IPS panel, there are also losses in the blue channel. As a result, the picture has a slightly different colour character, which is well illustrated in the comparative materials. This is a very good example showing why ready-made settings downloaded from the internet do not always work even within the same model.

However, returning to the assessment itself, this unit performs quite well, especially in SDR content. Colour tests show correct saturation and colour consistency, without glaring errors that could hinder everyday viewing. In HDR materials, it is possible to notice slight losses in reds, but these are not flaws that completely spoil the image perception. The biggest limitations do not stem directly from the colours, but rather from the whites and blacks. The use of an IPS panel and slightly lowered gamma means that the image is slightly boosted in brightness, and weak blacks further affect perceived contrast. This makes everything look brighter, but at the same time, it lacks depth, especially during evening viewing.

Right out of the box the LG C6 is pretty well set up, especially if you select Filmmaker mode. In SDR content the white balance is good, although as brightness increases it starts to lack red slightly. This makes the picture a bit cooler, but not enough to be very noticeable during normal viewing. More is going on in the luminance response. Gamma is a bit low and instead of holding at 2.4 it sits closer to 2.1–2.2 across a large part of the range. In practice the C6 slightly brightens midtones. Shadows are therefore more readable, but the image loses a little depth compared with how it should look in a dark room.

In HDR the situation is a bit more interesting. The start of the grayscale looks very good, but from around 20–30% brightness the white balance starts to drift more strongly. As brightness increases red builds up and blue becomes noticeably lacking. In the brightest parts the difference is already significant and also affects the reproduction of some colours. The EOTF curve itself is handled quite well across most of the range. The C6 only has a tendency to slightly brighten the picture, which we've already seen in our film comparisons. The biggest deviation appears around the brightest sections where the TV starts to adapt the signal to the panel's capabilities.

So the factory Filmmaker setting in HDR is not perfect, but overall performs well. The biggest room for improvement is the white balance, especially at high brightness.

Color reproduction after calibration

8/10

9.1/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, the picture has been brought to a really reasonable level. The whole thing looks cohesive and natural, and when it comes to colour reproduction, it's hard to definitively say whether we're dealing with a VA or IPS panel. This is a good sign, showing that the television has a solid foundation for further adjustments. The larger colour gamut in this variant is a plus, as it can subtly enhance the depiction of colourful scenes, especially in HDR content. However, this advantage is largely offset by the boosted blacks resulting from the use of an IPS panel. The limited depth of black affects perceived contrast, particularly when watching in a dark room. As a result, despite noticeable improvement post-calibration, the final rating remains the same as that of the variant with a VA panel. Better colours are not able to fully compensate for the weaker blacks.

LG TVs have long responded very well to calibration, and the C6 is no exception. After adjustment, the white balance was set almost perfectly, and most colour errors fell to values below 3, often around 2. In practice this means very accurate colour reproduction in both SDR and HDR. An interesting detail only showed up with the HDR luminance response. On a classic EOTF chart everything looks almost perfect and at first glance it would be hard to fault. Only when we measured the TV’s behaviour using filters based on real film scenes did it emerge that the C6 has a slight tendency to artificially boost image brightness.

It isn’t a huge difference and many people may even see it as a positive, since HDR looks a bit more punchy. From the point of view of fidelity to the source material it’s not ideal, though — some scenes are simply a touch brighter than the filmmaker intended. Interestingly, this is quite atypical for LG. In previous generations, this brand’s TVs usually stuck very closely to the reference picture characteristics after calibration. With the C6 we’re still very close to the standard, but that subtle boost in brightness can indeed be noticed in movies and TV shows.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.5/10

5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

When it comes to the fluidity of tonal transitions, in the 75-inch version with an IPS panel, we have mixed feelings. Looking solely at the colour gradients, the transitions perform even better than in the variant with a VA panel. Colours blend more smoothly, and typical banding issues are less noticeable. However, the situation changes drastically in dark scenes. The tragic blacks characteristic of IPS severely mar the perception of tonal transitions in low brightness levels. The boosted blacks make it difficult to discern subtle colour shades, and the very unnatural glow from the panel further worsens the situation. In the tested unit, the backlight bleed was particularly noticeable at the edges, where light practically seeped through to the screen. This not only negatively impacts the perception of dark scenes but also significantly hinders a reliable assessment of the gradation itself.

In terms of tonal transitions alone, the C6H performs really well. Gradients are smooth, colours don't break into obvious banding and, in both bright and dark scenes, it's hard to find major posterisation issues. For most content the image looks very clean in this respect.

Note: The situation is much worse, however, when it comes to dithering around black. In very dark parts of the image you can notice distinct flicker and graininess that, at close viewing distances, can be quite pronounced. On the Tandem OLED panel version the effect is noticeably stronger than on the regular C6. That's a shame, because the tonal transitions themselves are at a very high level here. It's precisely the behaviour of the image just above black that is the main reason we can't rate this category higher.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.7/10

8.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

In the Philips PUS9010, we find another iteration of the P5 Perfect Picture image processor, which aims to improve the quality of lower-grade materials. One of the components of this system is a distortion reduction function that smooths tonal transitions. It works effectively and actually reduces visible banding. Unfortunately, it does so quite aggressively. In practice, it can mute details such as material textures or film grain. This is a clear compromise, so we wouldn't particularly recommend it for movie sessions. For more casual content, like YouTube or regular television, it performs much better. The P5 processor also handles lower resolution materials quite well. The image is soft, at times even too soft, but it can easily be corrected using the sharpness slider, adjusting the effect to personal preferences. A positive aspect is also the absence of edge cropping in SD materials, which is still not standard in this class of televisions.

Here the LG C6 has taken a really big step forward. The TV uses the same processor found in the flagship G6, and in terms of image processing the two models are very similar. That's a big plus, because in this area LG's processor this year performs excellently. The 'Smooth Gradation' function works especially well. With heavily compressed material it can effectively hide unsightly tonal banding and artefacts that often appear, for example, in lower-quality streaming. It's best left on the 'Low' setting. That way the improvement is clear, and the TV doesn't yet start to blur fine details. Higher levels smooth the picture more, but can begin to remove some of the natural texture of objects on screen. Upscaling itself also performs very well. Lower-resolution content is properly sharpened, edges look clean, and the processor quite effectively reconstructs fine details. In this respect the C6 is already really close to LG's top TVs and the differences compared with the G6 are small.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.7/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
165Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
48%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur (4K@165Hz):

Philips PUS9010 has a 4K panel with a refresh rate of 144 Hz, which will be appreciated mainly by sports fans and gamers. This is especially noticeable in dynamic scenes where the motion is sharp, and annoying blur is almost non-existent. When it comes to movies (standard 24 fps), Philips offers us a proven set of settings known from its higher series. Two sliders are used to control motion. “Smoothness” allows you to adjust the picture to your liking: at low settings, it maintains a cinematic character, while moving the slider to the right gives us a perfectly smooth, albeit slightly “theatrical” effect. Meanwhile, “Motion Blur Reduction” is a feature designed for sports – it ensures that fast-moving objects do not lose detail and remain clear.

The C6H with a Tandem OLED panel can also run at a refresh rate of up to 165 Hz. PC gamers will get the most out of that, of course, because with consoles, films or sport we're still looking at a maximum of 120 Hz. The panel itself performs excellently in motion. OLED pixels respond almost instantly, so even with fast-moving objects you don't see the usual trailing. The picture stays clean both when watching sport and in fast-paced games.

If you prioritise smoothness over motion clarity, TruMotion is available. LG lets you adjust two parameters separately. De-Judder mainly works with films and series shot at 24 fps and reduces their characteristic judder. De-Blur is intended for 50/60 fps content, so it's mainly useful when watching sport or TV.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

10/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    40 - 165Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Philips PUS9010 is a solid machine for gaming. It has everything that’s important: VRR, automatic game mode (ALLM), and support for HGiG. The latter is fantastic – it allows you to set HDR in games exactly the way the developers envisioned. The TV handles 120 Hz refresh rates effortlessly at every popular resolution (1080p, 1440p, and 4K). It doesn’t matter if you connect a PS5, Xbox, or a powerful PC – everything runs smoothly and just as it should. Gamers will also appreciate the Game Bar. It’s a quick, clear menu where you can immediately see if the low latency mode is active. This is especially useful when frequently switching between different consoles. The whole experience is enhanced by Ambilight. Evening sessions with this backlighting create a whole different level of atmosphere; the image seems larger, and dynamic scenes are even more impressive. Even if someone isn’t a fan of such “gimmicks,” it’s hard to deny that it makes an impression.

The C6H offers virtually a full gaming feature set. On consoles you can easily use 4K at 120 Hz, while PC users can push the refresh rate up to 165 Hz. The TV also supports VRR from 40 to 165 Hz, ALLM and a correct implementation of HGiG. Dolby Vision is available in game mode too, which remains a big plus for Xbox owners. All the key info can be seen in the Game Bar, which provides quick access to VRR settings and the current signal parameters. The tandem OLED doesn’t change the actual feature set for gamers, but with such high panel brightness HDR games can look even more impressive. Functionally, the C6H is simply a very complete TV for consoles and PC.

Input lag

9.5/10

9.9/10

SDR

1080p60
18 ms
14 ms
1080p120
8 ms
5 ms
2160p60
18 ms
14 ms
2160p120
8 ms
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
18 ms
14 ms
2160p120
8 ms
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
34 ms
22 ms
2160p120 DV
14 ms

In terms of responsiveness, the Philips PUS9010 performs very well. The input lag is around 9 ms at 120 Hz and 18 ms at 60 Hz, so the response to movement with the controller is quick and predictable. In practice, even dynamic action games or e-sports titles pose no issues. Dolby Vision in games is less impressive. The lag then increases to around 35 ms, which for less demanding players is still acceptable, but more sensitive individuals may feel a slight sluggishness in control. For this reason, HDR10 with HGiG enabled remains the better choice. In this model, it works correctly, providing lower lag and more predictable brightness behaviour, without the issues that can occur with Dolby Vision.

The C6’s input lag is what you’d expect from a good gaming TV. At 120 Hz we measured about 5 ms, so controller input feels practically instantaneous. At 60 Hz the figure rises to roughly 14 ms, but that’s still a good result. Latency is a bit higher in Dolby Vision: about 14 ms at 120 Hz and roughly 22 ms at 60 Hz. In practice, if you’re playing on an Xbox, it’s unlikely to be something that will actually bother you.

Compatibility with PC

8.9/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
9ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RGB
RWBG
Max refresh rate
144Hz
165Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Philips PUS9010 (2025) is a very good television for using with a PC. The manufacturer has included a dedicated 144 Hz mode for PC gamers, and the television correctly supports variable refresh rates for both NVIDIA and AMD graphics cards. G-Sync and FreeSync functions work seamlessly, making PC gaming smooth and free from screen tearing. Since we already know that the television is very suitable for gaming, it’s also worth noting the readability of text, especially during daily work with a PC. The use of an IPS panel definitely works in its favour. Chroma has been implemented correctly, so one can speak of almost perfect font reproduction. Text is sharp, clear, and does not cause problems even with prolonged use. However, from our meticulous observations, we must note a minor detail. With very dark text, vertical and horizontal lines can have slightly different brightness levels. This is, however, purely a technical flaw, virtually imperceptible in practice, especially in the case of the 75-inch variant, where the distance from the screen further masks this effect.

The C6H with a Tandem OLED panel also works very well as a computer monitor. When working with text the most important thing is that the TV correctly handles 4:4:4 chroma subsampling, so small fonts, icons and UI elements are displayed clearly. The only thing you might notice from very close up are faint coloured fringes caused by the unusual subpixel layout. From a normal viewing distance on a screen this large it practically doesn’t matter, and in everyday use text is very readable. The C6H performs even better when the computer is used for gaming. The TV can run at refresh rates up to 165 Hz, supports G-Sync and VRR, and input lag at the maximum refresh rate is about 5 ms. Combined with the very fast response time of the OLED panel this makes for excellent conditions for PC gaming. There’s no smearing, motion is very smooth and controls respond almost instantly. In this respect the C6H can easily be treated not just as a TV but as a very large gaming monitor. You just need to remember that at 77 or 83 inches setting up your desk sensibly can be quite a challenge. 😉

Viewing angles

5.8/10

7.3/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
58%
30%

The viewing angles on the Philips PUS9010 are very good, and this is one of the biggest advantages of the IPS panel. Compared to the variant with a VA panel, the difference is clear. The image maintains significantly better consistency, and the colours remain stable even when viewed from a large angle. Of course, with a change in position, the brightness level does drop slightly; however, the degradation of the image is much less than in the VA version. It isn't at the level known from OLED screens, but among LCD televisions, you can talk about having one of the better viewing angles available on the market.

The C6H with a Tandem OLED panel also offers very wide viewing angles. You can watch the TV well from far off to the side and the picture still maintains high contrast and saturated colours. As you'd expect from an OLED, it's one of those screens where you don't have to fight for the exact middle spot on the couch. Only TVs with QD-OLED panels from Samsung Display actually perform better in this regard. The C6H's slightly lower rating comes from our sample having a bit more tendency to shift towards a greenish tint when viewed at very extreme angles. It's a subtle difference we noticed mainly in direct side-by-side comparisons. During normal viewing, most people probably won't notice it.

Daytime performance

5.4/10

7.6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Glare
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED): 690 cd/m2

PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS): 398 cd/m2

In terms of use in a bright room, the Philips PUS9010 performs reasonably well. The applied satin matrix effectively dampens reflections and does not cause a mirror effect, meaning the screen does not distract as much from light coming in from windows or lamps. Unfortunately, compared to the variant with a VA matrix, the television performs less well. The screen is noticeably darker, which can be felt in a strongly sunlit room. Under normal daytime conditions, this does not present a major problem, but in very bright surroundings, the difference compared to the VA version is noticeable.

The version with a Tandem OLED panel performs noticeably better during the day. The screen coating behaves very similarly, it’s glossy, suppresses reflections quite well and holds black levels with the lights on. A strong window or lamp will still be visible on the screen, but the image doesn’t lose much of its depth because of it. The biggest difference here is, of course, brightness. In typical SDR content the C6H reaches around 690 nits, which is clearly more than the standard C6. In a bright living room you can really notice it — the picture has more punch and cuts through the light entering the room much better.

Tandem OLED also handles scenes with lots of bright elements on screen better, although brightness still drops with near-full white. So they haven’t completely eliminated one of OLEDs’ typical traits, but the limitation is much less severe here. If the TV will often be used in a bright living room, this is one of the C6H’s advantages over the regular C6 that you’ll actually notice day to day.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
WRGB TANDEM OLED
Software version during testing
TPN258E_V058.002.236.151
43.11.73
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS)

LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED)

TV features

6.1/10

8.4/10

  • System
    Titan OS
    WebOS
  • System performance
    Decent
    Very good
  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    IR (remote)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 1Gbit
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) TV features
Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) TV features
Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) TV features
Review PHILIPS PUS9010 (IPS) TV features
Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) TV features
Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) TV features
Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) TV features
Review LG OLED C6H (TANDEM OLED) TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    Yes
    No
  • Font size adjustment
    No
    No
  • Audio description
    No
    Yes

Classic TV Features

When it comes to classic features, the Philips PUS9010 is rather average. It includes basics such as EPG, teletext, and the ability to connect headphones via Bluetooth. However, that's basically where the stronger points end. Unfortunately, it lacks USB recording and the PiP mode (picture in picture). These are features that are becoming less common, but they can still be useful in everyday use. On the plus side, the remote control comes with a numeric keypad. It's modern, backlit, and visually makes a very good impression. It's just a pity that it's still an infrared remote, so it requires aiming at the screen. With such a modern look, it really would have been nice to have Bluetooth radio control.

Smart TV

Most Philips TVs from 2025, including the PUS9010, run on the Titan OS system. This is still a relatively young platform and unfortunately, its limitations are still visible. The system itself runs quite smoothly, noticeably better than in the manufacturer's cheaper models, and during testing, it did not encounter problems when using screen mirroring or AirPlay, which is still not a given. However, the biggest drawback remains the limited number of available applications. This can be partially circumvented by connecting a keyboard and mouse to the TV and using the built-in web browser, but this is more of a makeshift solution than a convenient daily option.

Smart TV: webOS

No matter which C6 version you get, the feature set stays the same. The heart of the TV is, of course, webOS, the system LG has been developing for many years. It runs fast, is well optimized, and above all offers access to virtually all popular apps. Netflix, Disney+, Prime Video, YouTube, Max and other streaming services — in this respect it's hard to find significant gaps. The system itself also provides a lot of extra options. There’s AirPlay, easy screen casting from a smartphone, smart home device control, and the ability to personalize the home screen. LG has been expanding webOS heavily for several generations, and at times the number of available tabs or recommendations can be a bit overwhelming, especially with background ads, but once you get used to it the system is convenient and, most importantly, runs smoothly.

Classic TV features

The C6 also performs very well when you want to use it like a regular TV, not just a screen for Netflix. Over-the-air TV reception, the program guide and channel switching work smoothly and there’s little to complain about. LG still offers the ability to record programs to USB, so in terms of classic features the set is really well equipped. There are really only two things missing. The first is PiP, the ability to display two video sources at the same time. The second is a backlight for the remote, which would be handy for evening viewing. Apart from that, the C6 has basically everything you’d expect from a modern TV.

Magic Remote: DIFFERENT VERSIONS

When buying the C6, it’s worth paying attention to the remote, because LG has created some confusion here. During our tests we had, among others, the C64 variant commonly found in large retail chains. The package included the new, much smaller Magic Remote Slim. It has fewer buttons and looks much more modern, but it still retains two of LG remotes’ most characteristic features: the scroll wheel and cursor control by moving the remote. The C6E we tested came with the older, larger Magic Remote. It works basically the same, but it has a traditional numeric keypad and many more physical buttons. It looks less modern, but some people, especially those used to classic remotes, may find it more convenient. So there’s no single answer as to which remote is better. The new one is smaller, simpler and more contemporary, while the older one gives faster access to a larger number of functions without navigating menus. It’s worth knowing that depending on the C6 designation, the box may contain either variant.

Apps

6.7/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

7.9/10

9.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The media player in the new Philips is a solid standard. It handles most popular video and audio files, operating stably and predictably. Although fans of rarer subtitle formats or specific image resolutions might feel a bit disappointed, for the average user, the built-in software does the job. It’s a convenient solution that means we don’t have to involve external equipment to play materials from an external drive.

During our tests the TV handled virtually all of the popular video formats we put on a USB stick without any problems. There were no issues with high bitrates, subtitles or more demanding files, so it's hard to find anything to criticise in that respect. The only exception was material with a DTS audio track. That's not surprising, as the TV simply doesn't support that codec. Aside from that, the player is good enough that most users will easily get by without installing external apps or connecting an additional player.

Sound

6.6/10

7/10

  • Maximum volume
    85dB
    88dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The sound from the Philips PUS9010 is simply adequate. The tested unit offers a 2.0 setup with a total power of 40 W, which is more than sufficient for everyday watching of TV, movies, or series. The sound is pleasant, but it's hard to describe it as anything above average, especially if you're after strong bass or greater dynamics. On the plus side, it supports a wide range of audio formats. When connecting a soundbar or home theatre system, the TV easily handles Dolby Atmos and DTS, without the need to fiddle with settings or lose sound quality. For those planning external speakers, this is definitely good news.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

88dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy