Philips PUS8359 (IPS) vs XIAOMI A PRO 2025

Direct compare

PUS8359 / PUS8349

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”55”65”

Available screen sizes: 43”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.2

5.6

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.3

    5.7

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    4.5

    6.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.6

    5.1

  • Gaming on console

    6.2

    6.2

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.0

    1.0

  • Watching in bright light

    4.3

    3.8

  • Utility functions

    5.7

    6.5

  • Apps

    7.0

    10.0

  • Sound quality

    6.1

    6.0

Advantages

  • Ambilight 3

  • Illuminated remote control

  • Basic features for gamers

  • Low input lag

  • Support for all audio formats (Dolby and DTS)

  • Expanded Google TV operating system

  • Voice control in Polish

  • Good image processing

  • High native contrast

  • Attractive price

Disadvantages

No like
  • Poor black and contrast

  • Average brightness

  • Limited TitanOS system

  • Low brightness

  • Poor font readability

  • The system can freeze

Our verdict

Philips PUS8359 is a television that captures attention mainly thanks to its three-sided Ambilight system. The adaptive backlighting creates an impressive effect, especially in the evening – the light behind the screen adds atmosphere while watching movies and makes the interior look more interesting. It’s a really cool addition, especially if we enjoy unconventional solutions. For gamers, this model can be a good starting choice. The low input lag of less than 10 ms ensures quick responses, while the Automatic Game Mode adjusts the settings to make gameplay smooth. If we play occasionally, the TV does the job, but it’s probably not equipment for those looking for top-notch experiences. When it comes to everyday use, it’s not ideal. The Titan OS looks simple, but it lacks many popular apps, which can be frustrating. Additionally, the interface can run slower than we’d like – switching apps or jumping between settings may sometimes require patience. If we’ve previously used more advanced systems like Android TV, Titan OS may disappoint us significantly. And what about picture quality? Here lies the problem. The panel offers average brightness and low contrast, so in bright rooms, the picture can look washed out. In darker scenes, blacks become more grey, which takes away details. HDR? Don’t expect great effects – the lack of Dolby Vision and limited technical capabilities mean that HDR content doesn’t make a significant impression. Philips PUS8359 is a television that works well for Ambilight fans and those looking for basic features. It performs decently in gaming, and evening viewings with the impressive backlighting will gain an extra atmosphere. However, if we care about high picture quality or an advanced Smart TV system, it’s worth looking at other models. This TV is a suggestion for those who don’t expect too much and want something simple with an interesting visual effect.

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 is an affordable QLED model that works well as a basic television at home. The Google TV operating system deserves special mention. Thanks to it, you can easily use apps like Netflix or YouTube. The interface is clear and easy to navigate, and the voice search capability in Polish ensures that we can quickly find the content we are interested in. The picture quality of the A Pro 2025 is sufficient for everyday TV watching or movies. Smooth tonal transitions and the enhancement of older materials make even lower resolution content look good. However, the screen brightness may disappoint in very sunny rooms – here, the TV performs moderately, but it fares much better in a darkened room. The television is more suited to occasional gaming. The low input lag provides quick response times, which is important for dynamic games. However, the 60 Hz panel and lack of more advanced features may not appeal to gamers looking for perfect image fluidity. On the other hand, A Pro 2025 may be sufficient for those who play from time to time. Not everything works perfectly. When connecting the TV to a computer, the fonts are hard to read, which can be an issue when working with text. The Google TV system itself can be a bit slow, which sometimes makes it difficult to switch between apps quickly. Xiaomi A Pro 2025 is a simple and functional TV that is good for everyday TV watching and using apps. It has its drawbacks, such as average brightness and issues with font readability, but at this price, it offers a lot. It’s a good choice for those looking for budget equipment for basic uses.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps

Where to buy

No links

No links

Contrast and black detail

1.9/10

5.9/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS8359 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,000:1

Review Philips PUS8359 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,050:1

Review Philips PUS8359 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review Philips PUS8359 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,050:1

Review Philips PUS8359 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

850:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,300:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,200:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,100:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Philips PUS8359/12 in the 55" and 43" versions is based on an IPS panel, which significantly affects the contrast quality. Unfortunately, test results clearly show a very low level. The blacks, instead of resembling deep tar, appear more like silver ash, which is especially noticeable when watching dark scenes. Such a level of contrast limits the ability to fully enjoy the image, particularly for those who prefer viewing in dimly lit rooms.

Xiaomi A Pro is equipped with a VA panel, which inherently offers distinctly better black depth and colour intensity compared to IPS panels, especially in darker conditions. Based on the tests conducted, the contrast measurement tool indicated a maximum value of around 6000:1. This is a solid result, ensuring good separation of image elements in darker scenes. An example is the film Oblivion, where the TV excelled at separating bright and dark areas, enhancing the visual effects. Unfortunately, the TV does not support local dimming technology, which is an obvious fact in this price range. This particularly stands out in tougher scenes, such as those from the film Sicario 2. In such moments, the black loses intensity and starts to resemble a navy blue shade. The lack of dynamic dimming of image segments means that details that should be deeply dimmed remain slightly illuminated.

HDR effect quality

3.6/10

3.2/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 76.0%, Bt.2020: 55.0%
DCI P3: 92.0%, Bt.2020: 70.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS8359 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

240 nit

Review Philips PUS8359 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

225 nit

Review Philips PUS8359 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

285 nit

Review Philips PUS8359 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

236 nit

Review Philips PUS8359 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

280 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

205 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

220 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

243 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

213 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

237 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

HDR luminance chart:

XIAOMI A PRO 2025

Philips PUS8359 (IPS)

The quality of the HDR effect on the Philips PUS8359/12 television is also not impressive. A brightness level of 280 nits is too low, resembling standard SDR more than true HDR, which is clearly evident on the five tested test cards. Additionally, the television does not impress in terms of colour gamut coverage – just 76% DCI-P3 is a result that can be considered poor, especially compared to other models in a similar price range.

In the HDR category, the television Xiaomi A Pro performs, to be blunt – poorly. In ideal conditions, it offers brightness at around 250 nits. This is a weak result; however, in this price range, many competing models offer similar or lower values. Such brightness is too low to fully capture the potential of HDR content. In practice, this means that the image lacks the proper depth and intensity expected from high-quality HDR. These values are more characteristic of Standard Dynamic Range (SDR), which means the true HDR effect remains out of reach for this model, and scenes that should stand out with spectacular brightness and contrast seem flat and lacking in vibrancy. However, for its price, the television offers good coverage of the DCI-P3 colour palette at 92%, thanks to quantum dot technology (specifically PFS LED). This results in vibrant and saturated colours, which will appeal particularly to gamers and movie enthusiasts who appreciate richer hues and better colour reproduction compared to traditional televisions without this technology.

Factory color reproduction

4/10

5.1/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

The most faithful factory mode in terms of compliance with the source material turned out to be "Film," which was used in our tests. However, like other factory modes, it also had its drawbacks. Both in SDR and HDR materials, we noticed issues with white balance, where the dominance of green and red resulted in a yellowish hue. This effect was particularly evident in the form of yellowed whites and unnatural skin tones. The "ColourChecker" palette test showed that each colour was shifted towards warmer tones, which affected the accuracy of colour reproduction. A key aspect of the image is also contrast and brightness, which can be assessed by analysing the gamma charts and the EOTF curve. In the gamma chart, we observed significant deviations – both excessively high values that caused loss of detail in the shadows and excessively low values, which led to a drastic drop in contrast. Compared to gamma, the EOTF curve performed better, only slightly brightening the image, which had a less negative impact on overall quality.

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 TV has been tested in movie mode, which offers the best colour reproduction straight out of the box. However, it’s worth noting that it is not without flaws. Analysing the white balance, one can see that the green values are in the negative. This phenomenon leads to some distortions in the shades of white, and at full white, the graph shows clear deviations. The high-contrast image results in inadequate tonal transitions in red, which negatively affects the quality of colour display. Generally, in the image below, it can be seen that the entire scenery before calibration takes on pink hues. Additionally, when analysing the gamma contrast, the graph is significantly below the value of 2.4, suggesting that the TV overly emphasises dark tones, while the brighter areas of the image may appear less pronounced. Furthermore, the EOTF curve shows a strong spike at the start, which can lead to a loss of detail in bright scenes and an unpleasant feeling of over-exaggeration. These aspects indicate the need for further calibration to achieve a more balanced colour reproduction and improve overall picture quality. Users who expect precise colour reproduction may need to take action to adjust the TV settings to achieve more realistic and natural visual results. In xiaomi tv a pro 2025, the factory colour settings in Xiaomi are average and may require calibration. After appropriate colour adjustment, the image gains a natural and vibrant colour palette, significantly closer to cinematic standards. It’s worth adding that the issue of inaccurate colour reproduction is typical for many TVs of this class, meaning it’s not a fault unique to the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 TV. For those who value perfect colour reproduction, professional calibration will be a key element that enhances overall picture quality.

Color reproduction after calibration

5/10

7/10

Philips, in both its cheaper and more expensive models, offers a wide range of tools for image calibration. We used them to improve the quality of the displayed image, although it was not as straightforward as it might seem. We managed to adjust the white balance, improve the gamma, and fine-tune the EOTF curve; however, despite these efforts, the deltaE errors remained at a very high level. The main causes were limited coverage of the DCI-P3 palette and low maximum brightness, which significantly affected the final outcome. While the overall presentation is much improved, the design features of the television did not allow us to achieve spectacular results.

Now it’s time to check how the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 TV performed after calibration. The biggest beneficiary of this process is white balance. After calibration, all previous errors were corrected in both HD and 4K content, and most errors no longer fell significantly outside the value of "2". This means a much more balanced and natural colour reproduction, which certainly affects the viewing comfort. In terms of gamma, the drop has been greatly mitigated, resulting in a more consistent tone reproduction across various scenes. However, the EOTF curve has not improved significantly due to a lack of effective control over dynamic tone mapping. This limitation means that there are still some issues with detail reproduction in bright scenes, which can affect the perception of certain materials. Nevertheless, despite these minor shortcomings, the overall shape of the picture is definitely better after calibration. The TV has gained quality, and the improved white balance along with reduced gamma issues means that users can enjoy a more realistic and pleasant visual experience. Further adjustments to the settings could improve the picture quality even more, but already the TV is demonstrating its capabilities, meeting the expectations of many users.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.4/10

9.3/10

The gradation of tonal transitions on the Philips PUS8359/12 television is at a good level, without any noticeable issues that could negatively affect the quality of content viewing. Upon closer inspection, one might notice slight imperfections in bright, colourful transitions; however, they are subtle enough that most users should not notice them or consider them a problem.

During the fluidity tests of tonal transitions in Xiaomi A Pro 2025, the gradation proved to be close to ideal. In most of the test sequences, there were no noticeable issues. Only in the scene with red water did very cosmetic imperfections appear, which, however, have no significant impact on the overall image quality. Both colour and grey gradients were reproduced with almost perfect precision, making this TV model a very good choice for those who pay attention to this particular feature of a television.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6/10

6.9/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

In this paragraph, we'll take a look at two functionalities. We'll once again examine the function responsible for tonal transitions, but we'll also check how the television handles image scaling. The option responsible for smooth gradation is called "Distortion Reduction". As we've established, it does a pretty good job of smoothing out inconsistencies. However, we must point out two things: we are unable to enable it for HDR content, and it blurs details in films.

The television being tested cannot boast the best image scaling. There is a noticeable overall blurriness in the image, but worse still, it blurs details. This is particularly evident on the branches and the model's hair. A characteristic white halo around the figures is also visible.

How does the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 handle tonal transitions, especially with lower quality materials? Thanks to advanced digital processing, the colour contour removal feature works surprisingly well. We recommend setting this option to "Medium" – this way, the television significantly improves the smoothness of tonal transitions while avoiding excessive smoothing of other image elements, such as film grain.

In the case of the test shot with the model and numerous branches in the background, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 showcased its capabilities in the context of digital processing. Adding artificial sharpness to this scene made the details of the model clearer, and her hair appeared more detailed. However, delicate contours appeared around the branches in the background, which were a result of digital intervention. While this enhances the overall impression of details, excessive sharpness can make some elements of the image seem unnaturally emphasised.

Blur and motion smoothness

4/10

4.3/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
-
Nie
BFI function 120Hz
-
Nie
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
0%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Philips PUS8359 is not the best choice for watching sports. The lack of even basic motion smoothing features means that the picture in dynamic scenes isn't sharp enough. Despite using an IPS panel (43 and 55'), which theoretically should provide better clarity than VA panel variants, there’s no noticeable improvement in terms of motion blur. In photos of fast movement, it’s clear that the figure of the little green man is distinctly blurry, indicating that the TV struggles to maintain sharpness in dynamic shots.

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 offers a motion smoothing feature called "Motion Smoothing," which primarily works for films. It can be customised to favour either a more cinematic, film-like effect with visible frames or a smoother, theatrical image. This feature should satisfy those who intend to watch mainly films on it. However, gamers and sports fans may feel disappointed. The panel with a refresh rate of 60 Hz, typical for this price range, does not impress. Our "Ufo" test revealed some blurring. Those expecting better clarity for moving objects may be slightly let down.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

3.3/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    No
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    No
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

In terms of console compatibility, Philips PUS8359 is mainly suitable for casual gamers. Although the TV is equipped with an HDMI 2.0 port, it offers features such as Automatic Low Latency Mode (ALLM), Variable Refresh Rate (VRR), and Game Bar. ALLM automatically switches the TV to low-latency mode, making quicker reactions during gaming easier, while VRR smoothly adjusts the refresh rate, eliminating screen tearing issues. The Game Bar provides quick access to game settings and ongoing parameter monitoring; however, in our opinion, it performs worse compared to competitors' solutions.

However, more demanding gamers may feel disappointed. Philips PUS8359 does not support advanced HDR formats in games or higher refresh rates, which is due to the use of a 60 Hz panel. These shortcomings limit the TV’s ability to deliver smooth and detailed experiences during fast-paced, dynamic gameplay.

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 offers several features useful for gamers, including Game Bar, which differs from the typical “dashboards” with interfaces found in other manufacturers. With this, users can quickly access game-related settings, which is convenient during intense gaming sessions. The TV also supports automatic low-latency mode (ALLM), meaning it automatically switches to a mode optimised for gaming, reducing signal delay. Unfortunately, it lacks support for HDMI 2.1, limiting the connection capabilities for the latest gaming consoles that may require higher bandwidth. Additionally, the TV does not support features such as VRR (variable refresh rate) or G-Sync, which are increasingly desired by gamers as they allow for smoother images and eliminate tearing. For these reasons, although Xiaomi A Pro 2025 has some features for gamers, in this price range, better options can be found that offer more advanced gaming solutions.

Input lag

10/10

9.8/10

SDR

1080p60
10 ms
15 ms
1080p120
2160p60
10 ms
15 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
10 ms
14 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

Philips PUS8359 offers an exceptionally low input lag of below 10 ms, which is a fantastic result. This makes the television perfect for dynamic gaming, providing quick responses and smooth gameplay, which will surely be appreciated by both casual and more demanding gamers.

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 delivers outstanding performance, regardless of resolution or HDR mode. With measurements as low as 15 ms, this TV ranks among the best in terms of responsiveness.

Compatibility with PC

6/10

1/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
10ms
105ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

The Philips PUS8359/12 TV with an IPS panel offers quite good font readability thanks to 4:4:4 chroma support, making it suitable for office work and everyday computer use. Although the low input lag makes it friendly for gamers in terms of response time, the lack of support for G-Sync and the 60 Hz panel might not meet the expectations of more demanding users. For those looking for a gaming TV, this could be a compromise – quick response is present, but the absence of higher refresh rates and adaptive image sync affects the rating in the gaming category.

In the category of collaboration with PCs, Xiaomi A Pro 2025 performs very poorly. The fonts are of low quality, and their display on the screen is often problematic. Dithering is ubiquitous; when zooming in on the fonts against a dark background, they are displayed in three colours, which is definitely eye-catching and can significantly hinder comfortable use of the device. Such issues can be a significant drawback for users planning to use the television as a computer monitor.

Viewing angles

6.3/10

2.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
60%
81%

The viewing angles on the Philips PUS8359 TV are quite good, thanks to the IPS panel used (43' and 55'). The image remains clear and distinct even when viewed from a greater angle, which is beneficial when watching content with a larger group or in rooms with an unconventional layout.

In the viewing angles category, Xiaomi A Pro 2025 with its VA panel simply performs poorly. While directly in front you can enjoy better blacks, the image loses quality from side perspectives. Our specialists found during the testing of the television that sitting a metre away from the device, the image on the right side is brightened and desaturated. However, moving a bit to the side improves everything, highlighting how significant the difference in image reception is depending on the viewing angle. All this makes the viewing experience in a larger group potentially less satisfying.

TV efficiency during daytime

4.3/10

3.8/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Average
Average
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

XIAOMI A PRO 2025: 249 cd/m2

Philips PUS8359 (IPS): 305 cd/m2

In terms of performance during the day, Philips PUS8359 performs average. The satin matrix coating moderately suppresses reflections, which may be noticeable in bright rooms. A brightness level of 300 cd/m² is acceptable in this price range, but one should not expect exceptional results in more challenging lighting conditions.

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 presents itself as average. The panel coating is satin, which may help reduce reflections, but the suppression of glare is moderate. The brightness of the television is only 250 nits, which is relatively low compared to other models on the market. As a result, during sunny days or in brightly lit rooms, the image quality may suffer, and details may be hard to discern.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
White LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
V246.004.012.161
RTM5.220609.003.1850
Image processor
M7632 2GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity:

Philips PUS8359 (IPS)

XIAOMI A PRO 2025

TV features

5.7/10

6.5/10

  • System
    Titan OS
    Google TV
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • AirPlay
    No
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
  • Possibility to connect Bluetooth headphones to the TV
    No
    Yes
  • Possibility to simultaneously use Bluetooth headphones and the TV speaker
    No
    No
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    RF
    RF
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes

Philips has decided to change its approach to the operating system this year, replacing the previous open system GoogleTV with its own TitanOS. As is often the case with new solutions, TitanOS is grappling with typical teething problems. Currently, it only offers basic apps, and the app store leaves much to be desired, which may disappoint users expecting a rich programme selection. Additionally, the lack of support for AirPlay features and the inability to record to USB are further limitations that could impact the overall user experience.

A notable feature in models with TitanOS is the new remote control, which is very convenient to use thanks to its backlighting. Unfortunately, its wireless operation is not entirely consistent. The hybrid design means that sometimes you have to aim at the television, while at other times you don’t—this depends on which buttons are being used. It’s just plain annoying.

The most important feature of the Philips PUS8359 television is the three-sided Ambilight system, which significantly enhances the viewing experience. The LED lighting placed on the sides and top of the television creates an immersive effect, extending the image beyond the screen and matching colours to the content being displayed. For many users, this is a key element that makes viewing sessions more engaging, and the television stands out from the competition.

In the functionality category, Xiaomi A Pro 2025 stands out with the Google TV system, which is one of its biggest advantages. This allows users access to a wide range of apps and streaming services, significantly enhancing the convenience of using the television. The Google TV system also offers a voice assistant that facilitates navigation and allows for quick content searches without the need to dig through menus. One of the key strengths of this system is the ability to download virtually unlimited apps from the Google Play Store, enabling personalisation of the television according to individual needs. Users can install apps for streaming, gaming, and various tools, making the television a multimedia entertainment hub. However, it is worth noting that this model lacks recording functions and AirPlay, which may be disappointing for some users. Additionally, there are quite significant lags in the operating system, affecting the ease of use. On the positive side, it also features the ability to pair other peripheral devices via Bluetooth and a remote that does not require aiming at the screen, which significantly improves user comfort. Despite some shortcomings, Xiaomi A Pro 2025 has the potential to meet the needs of users looking for a modern television.

Playing files from USB

8/10

6.8/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The default media player built into Philips PUS8359 offers quite a wide range of capabilities but also has its limitations. It plays virtually all video formats, with the obvious exception of Dolby Vision and the less obvious .asf, which isn't commonly encountered. However, the problem lies in the lack of H.265 HEVC codec support at high bitrates. When it comes to photos, the player performs adequately, but it lacks support for some popular resolutions and formats like HEIC, used on Apple devices. The player performs best with audio, where it can't be faulted. Unfortunately, due to system limitations, there's no possibility to expand functions, meaning we have to stick with what the manufacturer has prepared.

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 offers a decent built-in media player that meets the basic expectations of users. However, the TV has its drawbacks and sometimes encounters issues with playing certain file formats, which can be frustrating. Fortunately, with access to Google Play Store, users can easily download alternative players that better meet their needs. In our test of the Xiaomi TV A Pro 2025, we demonstrated that its compatibility with applications is high, and additional media playback applications work flawlessly. It is also worth highlighting that the Xiaomi TV A Pro 2025 is equipped with the Android TV platform, enabling access to a wide range of applications and streaming services. Installing alternative media players enhances the overall functionality of the device and eliminates format compatibility issues. As a result, Xiaomi A Pro becomes a more versatile television that can meet the diverse expectations of users, even those with higher demands regarding media playback.

Apps

7/10

10/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
OK
Kodi

Sound

6.1/10

6/10

  • Subjective sound quality:
    6.1/10
    6/10
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1:
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1:
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC):
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD:
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA:
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio:
    Yes
    Yes

The audio system in the Philips PUS8359 is a standard configuration with 2x10 W speakers, which is unlikely to impress audiophiles. At moderate volume levels (up to 50% of maximum), the sound remains acceptable and does not produce significant distortion. For better audio experiences, we definitely recommend connecting even a simpler soundbar. With support for Dolby Atmos and DTS, the TV works well with external audio systems.

When it comes to sound, Xiaomi A Pro 2025 pleasantly surprises, especially considering its price. The sound quality is really solid, and the audio does not deviate from what one might expect in this class. Additionally, the TV supports DTS audio formats, which are often missing in much more expensive TVs. It's worth noting that this rating is subjective and may vary depending on individual preferences.