The Panasonic W70A draws attention primarily because of its advanced Google TV operating system, which gives us access to a multitude of popular applications (YouTube, Netflix, Disney+, HBO Max, etc.). In terms of picture quality, the IPS panel offers wide viewing angles, so colours do not lose their intensity even when you watch a film from an angle. Gamers will also not be disappointed, as it features VRR and ALLM, along with low input lag (around 12 ms) – all of this translates to pleasant experiences during occasional gaming, despite the standard 60 Hz refresh rate.
However, it's worth noting that this is rather a basic model and has its limitations. The contrast and blacks are simply weak, which is a typical phenomenon for IPS panels, especially in dark rooms. A brightness level of around 270 cd/m² is also insufficient in heavily sunlit rooms, so the picture can seem washed out. Certain shortcomings in the software itself cannot be overlooked either. Google TV is a great foundation, but sometimes settings are scattered in surprising places, and the quality of translations leaves a lot to be desired.
It must be considered that the competition is offering more and more in a similar (or slightly higher) price range. Can the Panasonic W70A hold its own in such an environment? On one hand, it tempts with a rich app base and decent support for gamers, but on the other – the market is flooded with more polished TVs equipped with better specifications. However, if wide viewing angles and straightforward access to Google TV services are priorities, we can give it a chance. In other cases, it’s worth exploring among competitive models that often offer better blacks, higher brightness, and fewer annoying issues in the menu at a similar price.
The Samsung R85H is above all a very versatile TV that performs well in pretty much any use case. You can put it in a bright lounge, hook up a console, watch a movie or series in the evening, or use it for everyday broadcast TV, and each time you’ll get a solid picture. It may not make the same immediate impression as Samsung’s best OLEDs, but it’s hard to point to a single feature that would seriously limit its usefulness. That versatility is probably its biggest strength. Of course the thing that draws most attention with the R85H is the new "Micro RGB" backlight. From our tests we’d say it can indeed deliver an advantage over classic Mini-LED, although not always in the areas the manufacturer emphasises most. On measurement charts its colour reproduction is impressive, but in real, more complex scenes the TV doesn’t always exploit the full potential of the three‑colour backlight. Its benefits are easiest to spot on simpler parts of the image, where intense reds, greens and blues can look really striking. Viewing angles are also slightly better, since colours retain their saturation off‑axis longer than on typical LCD TVs. Micro RGB doesn’t, however, solve all the limitations of RGB technology. With very saturated elements you can sometimes notice slight colour bleeding into adjacent bright parts of the image, and the relatively small number of local dimming zones means the backlight can’t always act as precisely as its on‑paper capabilities might suggest. The R85H shows that RGB does have potential and could be the next step in LCD TV development, but using coloured LEDs alone doesn’t automatically produce a huge jump in image quality. We’d therefore treat the R85H mainly as a somewhat better and more interesting alternative to the QN80H, not as a TV you must buy at all costs just because it says Micro RGB. If the price gap between the models is sensible, we’d pick the R85H. We wouldn’t pay a large premium solely for the new backlight, because its everyday advantage isn’t always as big as the marketing materials might imply. All the same, the R85H is a successful all‑round TV, and that’s probably the best way to look at it.