Xiaomi S Pro 2026 vs TCL C69K / Q6C

Direct comparison

C69K / Q6C / C6K

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”98”

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.2

7.1

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.7

    6.7

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.3

    6.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.4

    6.3

  • Gaming on console

    7.7

    8.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    7.4

    6.4

  • Utility functions

    7.2

    7.0

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    7.1

    6.5

Advantages

  • Good black levels and contrast (SDR)

  • Very high peak brightness (great for a bright living room)

  • Complete package for gamers (144 Hz panel, HDMI 2.1, VRR)

  • Extremely low input lag in SDR mode (below 10 ms)

  • Surprisingly good, strong sound (branded with Harman Kardon)

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS:X

  • Rich Google TV system (with AirPlay and Chromecast)

  • Proper compatibility with PC (clear fonts and 288Hz mode)

  • Outstanding price-to-specification ratio

  • Very good contrast and black: VA panel and MINI-LED backlighting

  • Good motion fluidity: High refresh rate of 144Hz

  • Decent panel brightness

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, HDMI 2.1, HGiG

  • Extra mode for PC gamers: 240Hz

  • GoogleTV system with a wide selection of apps

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Very attractive price

Disadvantages

No like
  • Local dimming algorithms practically do not work in HDR content

  • Useless Dolby Vision Gaming mode (input lag approx. 100 ms)

  • Poorly implemented HGiG mode

  • Strongly visible banding (color stepping) in dark scenes

  • Very weak upscaling and digital image processing

  • Google TV can "stutter"

  • Managing the backlighting could be more precise

  • Minor, occasional system errors

  • Slight smudging visible in dynamic scenes

  • Great chaos in naming (many derivative models that differ in nothing)

Our verdict

Is it worth buying the Xiaomi S Pro 2026? The answer to this question is quite complicated. Let's start with what's really great about this TV. First of all, the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 has an excellent price-to-performance ratio. We get a Mini LED panel with very high brightness, which handles well in a sunlit living room. Additionally, it has a fast 144 Hz (or even 288 Hz) display and a complete package for gamers: two HDMI 2.1 ports, support for VRR, and an impressively low input lag (under 10 ms). If we mainly watch "regular" content and play games, this is truly a fantastic screen. Even the built-in 30W speakers are surprisingly good and support Dolby Atmos. Unfortunately, there’s also a second, very problematic side to this model. In short: the software. We have the impression that Xiaomi has given us great "parts," but couldn't get them to work together correctly. The biggest problem is the HDR mode – the main reason one buys a TV today. For unknown reasons, the TV in HDR mode (HDR10, Dolby Vision) does not manage its dimming zones well. As a result, the black, which should be deep, becomes gray or bluish like in a regular LCD TV. There are also other software issues, such as the terrible implementation of HGiG or the fact that the Dolby Vision mode for gamers is useless due to enormous input lag (100 ms). Furthermore, the TV's capability for digital image processing is very poor. So how do we summarize this in terms of price? In its price class, the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 crushes the competition in terms of specifications. Other TVs for this money are usually simple LCD models without dimming, often only with a 60 Hz panel. The question then is: what is more important to you? If you are simply looking for a very bright and cheap TV for watching television during the day and gaming, and you are willing to calibrate it – you will be very satisfied with it. However, if you are looking for a TV to enjoy spectacular HDR in movies and games straight out of the box, you will be terribly disappointed with this model. In this case, in our opinion, it is better to pay a little more for a basic OLED TV or a more refined Mini-LED model from the competition.

The TCL C69K / Q6C is a TV that perfectly targets gamers and movie fans on a reasonable budget. Its biggest strength is the combination of a VA panel with Mini-LED backlighting. Simply put, contrast is high and blacks are deep, making evening movie sessions look truly impressive. Add to that a 144 Hz refresh rate, which does wonders not only for sports but especially for gaming. And for gamers, it’s a full package: HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, HGiG, and even a 240 Hz option for PC. Throw in Dolby Vision, which gives movies a cinematic touch, and you get a picture that’s just pleasing to the eye. On the software side, it runs Google TV with the Gemini AI assistant, so there’s no shortage of apps. The sound system holds up well too — Dolby Atmos and DTS support are nice additions, complemented by branded Onkyo speakers. Of course, it’s not perfect. The local dimming system can sometimes struggle in complex scenes, slightly lifting black levels. And those Polish translations in the menu... let’s just say they could use some work. Still, the C69K / Q6C makes a very strong case for itself. Considering the price, it’s one of the most interesting all-around TVs for both movies and gaming. Definitely worth watching out for during sales — and hoping for TCL’s usual post-launch firmware improvements.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Good
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
No
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.4/10

7.3/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 532 (28 x 19)

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 180 (10 x 18)

Contrast:

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

1,001,650:1

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

52,600:1

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

17,900:1

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

17,200:1

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

10,150:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

113,750:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

17,350:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

16,300:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

9,850:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

4,850:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

Let's get to the point, which is what is most important in the Mini LED panel: black levels and contrast. The Xiaomi S Pro 2026 is built on a VA matrix, which right from the start promises deep blacks. Let's add to that Mini LED backlighting with a very large number of local dimming zones. In the 65-inch variant we tested, we counted as many as 532 of them. That's a solid number that should provide precise control over the backlighting. It should be noted that this number is proportional to the size—choosing the smaller 55-inch variant will result in correspondingly fewer zones, while larger models will have more.

So, how does the black level perform on the S Pro 2026? The answer is complex.

Generally, it's really not bad, and we see a clear improvement compared to the problematic model from 2025. As you can see in our measurement charts, the results are occasionally spectacular. In most of the film scenes we measured in SDR (standard dynamic range), the contrast could be confidently described as very good and even comparable to constructions three times more expensive. Well, it could be... and this brings us to the paradox of this model. The problem lies in how the TV manages zones in scenarios other than SDR. As soon as we feed the TV a higher quality signal, such as an HDR series or Dolby Vision from streaming platforms (Netflix, HBO Max, or Disney+), something strange happens. We have an overwhelming impression that the TV suddenly... forgets that it was equipped with local dimming zones at all. As shown in our video below, the black in such scenes resembles more shades of dark gray or navy blue. On top of that, there's a slight flickering of the entire screen. This is the level one would expect from TVs completely devoid of a local dimming system. It seems that Xiaomi decided to fix one, but crucial flaw of last year's 2025 model over the year. And they succeeded – we no longer have the annoying "zone disco," and the picture is stable. It's just a pity that when consuming top-quality content (HDR), the whole advanced system becomes completely useless.

The heart of the image in TCL C69K / Q6C is a VA panel (specifically HVA from TCL CSOT), which offers a solid native contrast ratio of 6000–7000:1, even before activating local dimming. However, the true strength of this model lies in the Mini-LED backlighting with the ability to dim individual zones. In the 55-inch sample we tested, we counted around 180 of these zones (this value increases with the diagonal size). For this price segment, the contrast is truly impressive. In less complicated movie scenes, for example in segments from "Oblivion," it looks outstanding, and the shots immersed in black are very striking. Nevertheless, the characteristics of Mini-LED technology mean that we cannot always avoid issues – in more demanding frames with many bright details, halo effects or excessive dimming of certain elements occur (regardless of the selected local dimming settings). All in all, contrast is undeniably a strong point of C69K / Q6C.

HDR effect quality

6.3/10

4.9/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 93.6%, Bt.2020: 70.9%
DCI P3: 92.7%, Bt.2020: 71.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

809 nit

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

526 nit

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

1033 nit

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

469 nit

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

718 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

610 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

204 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

425 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

148 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

589 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

TCL C69K / Q6C

Xiaomi S Pro 2026

When it comes to HDR quality, the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 is undoubtedly a really bright TV. On our synthetic measurement charts, we were able to generate a peak brightness of around 1400 nits. This is not only a very good result but even spectacular, considering the price of this model. However, as we always repeat, for our editorial team, measurements and experiences from the content we watch every day—movies and series—are more important. So let's analyze how Xiaomi handles film material. Unfortunately, the result is somewhat mixed. When very bright scenes appear on the screen, the S Pro 2026 truly shows its full potential and can achieve real brightness of 800-1000 nits on bright elements. Moreover, even smaller objects can "burn" the eyes— in scenes from the movie Sicario 2, small metallic elements of the helicopter were really bright. The problem is this—and here the story comes full circle back to our assessment of contrast—that in such scenes, we cannot count on absolutely cinematic black. In our opinion, this compromise is too significant; high visibility of details in bright areas should not come at the expense of such a substantial boost in black levels. And even though the HDR effect itself can be striking here, it is important to remember that when very difficult, mixed scenes appear on the screen, we may feel a slight disappointment. Exactly the one we mentioned in the previous paragraph regarding dimming issues in HDR mode. On a positive note, it is worth adding that the S Pro 2026 is equipped with an additional PFS filter (which works similarly to a QLED layer), effectively broadening the color palette coverage. As a result, measurements showed a DCI-P3 color gamut coverage of up to 94%. This gives us the confidence that in most colorful scenes, the image will look rich and appropriately saturated.

In terms of brightness, TCL C69K / Q6C is a moderate model. Under optimal movie conditions, it shows its full potential, reaching a maximum of around 600 nits. In scenes with large, intense light sources, the HDR effect can be truly satisfying, providing a cinematic sparkle. However, it should be noted that when managing the backlight zones, there are situations where some elements of the image become dimmed, and sometimes they are barely visible. This suggests that there is still a lack of proper optimization of algorithms, though considering the technical parameters in this price range, the construction still looks very good.

Factory color reproduction

4.1/10

5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

Of course, we conducted all our measurements in "Film" mode, which is usually the best and most accurate choice you get straight out of the box. And we have to say it bluntly: even though this is the best mode, it is still very far from ideal. First of all, the television has a clear tendency to give the image a cool, bluish tint – this is due to a poorly set white balance. Additionally, there is a problem with how the S Pro 2026 manages its brightness right after being taken out of the box, which results in an overly bright image. These two flaws contribute to really huge colorimetric errors (Delta E). In HDR content, they were able to exceed our expected error scale of "10" (meaning values close to 20). For reference – the threshold of perceivable error by the human eye is a Delta E value of around 3. Results at the level of 20 mean that the image significantly deviates from what the director intended.

The Filmmaker mode, which has arrived in this year's TCL televisions (including the C69K / Q6C), is definitely the best choice "to start with." This is the mode we recommend for everyday viewing of movies and series. Unfortunately, as is often the case, best does not mean perfect. In SDR content, the image turned out to be too warm, with a strong red tint in the white balance. We had the opposite impression with HDR content – here the image became cooler than it should have, due to an excess of blue color. Additionally, the brightness characteristics sometimes resulted in overexposure. In practice, this translated to quite noticeable errors in color tests, which is hard to accept in a mode labeled as “by the creators.”

Color reproduction after calibration

7.2/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

So how does the S Pro 2026 perform after our calibration treatment? We must admit that after calibration, the television becomes a really pleasant device for watching everyday content. As you can see in the graphs, we managed to bring both white balance and gamma values to nearly perfection in HD (SDR) material. Most importantly, the colorimetric errors have become practically invisible to the human eye. In this scenario, the S Pro 2026 is simply a great television that, after professional calibration, can provide a lot of enjoyment while watching. However, it is worth noting clearly – our efforts helped little in 4K HDR mode. Despite calibration, the television still interprets the image rather strongly "in its own way," which is clearly seen in the measurement of the EOTF curve (luminance tracking). It's a bit of a shame, because this shows that the problem lies not in the panel itself, but in the software. Underdeveloped image management algorithms in HDR content can, unfortunately, disqualify this television for many more discerning users.

Through white balance adjustment, we were able to significantly reduce the tendency of C69K / Q6C to distort colors, which resulted in a very good final outcome. After calibration, the issue of excessive warmth in SDR scenes and overly cool images in HDR disappeared. However, it is worth closely analyzing brightness characteristics. While there are few complaints about SDR content - the image looks really good, especially in older movies, TV programs, or on YouTube - the situation is much worse with HDR content. Analysis of the EOTF curve suggests that everything is fine, but in practice (EOTF in films), the limitations of the design become apparent. This model tends to excessively brighten small parts of the frame, while in other situations it dims the entire scene too much. The effect of calibration is undeniable, and in terms of color accuracy, C69K / Q6C gains a lot. Unfortunately, certain limitations resulting from local dimming management simply cannot be overcome.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

6.9/10

9.5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

Let’s now move on to the analysis of tonal transitions, meaning the fluidity with which the television can render transitions between closely related shades. In the case of the Xiaomi S Pro 2026, the image that emerges from this is extremely dichotomous. On one hand, we have bright gradations. When scenes with blue skies or other smooth transitions in the bright parts of the image appear on the screen, the S Pro 2026 handles them excellently. They look perfectly smooth, without any visible artifacts.

Unfortunately, the situation changes drastically as soon as dark scenes take over the screen. To put it bluntly – they look really poor. Instead of a smooth tonal transition in the dark, the joins of colors and unsightly "stepping" of gradients are very clearly visible on the screen. In darker films or games, this is very noticeable and can effectively ruin the viewing experience.

In the model C69K / Q6C, tonal transitions (between colors) are very smooth, and it's hard to notice any banding. The image looks natural, and any minor imperfections are only visible on bright test screens, and only with very careful observation. In everyday viewing, the effect is simply fantastic. It can confidently be stated that in this category, C69K / Q6C performs remarkably.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

4.5/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Let's start with the issue we addressed in the previous paragraph: can a TV even fix the problem of poor tonal transitions in dark scenes? Theoretically, yes – in the menu, we find a feature with the promising name "Color Contour Removal." Well, "theoretically." Unfortunately, in practice, this setting – regardless of which of the three power levels is selected – yielded absolutely no real results. So we have a feature that, in practice, only exists in the menu. Moving on to the quality of upscaling (scaling the image from a lower resolution to 4K), unfortunately, we have more bad news for you. The S Pro 2026 handles this task very poorly. Interestingly, the phenomenon of "overscan" (slight image cropping) is not a big issue here. The problem is that the TV simply displays a very raw, unprocessed image. Its attempt to upscale the signal to a higher resolution looks simply poor and lacks any "smart" enhancement. There is no denying it – the whole digital image processing is the true Achilles' heel of this model.

In terms of image scaling, TCL C69K / Q6C performs quite well. Lower quality content is displayed acceptably, and thanks to the lack of overscan issues, the image is presented in full without any cropping. However, one shouldn't expect miracles – very low-quality materials won't gain a new life here, as the image processor has its limitations.

On thin lines and details, one can see characteristic jitter, indicating a lack of more advanced image enhancement algorithms. It's also a pity that the C69K / Q6C lacks the function for smoothing tonal transitions. As a result, in older movies or video materials, color banding can be noticeable and may become distracting during longer viewing sessions.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.5/10

7.3/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
BFI function 120Hz
No
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur (1080p@288Hz):

Blur ():

On paper, the specification of the S Pro 2026 looks impressive. The television is equipped with a native 144 Hz panel, capable of displaying images up to 288 Hz in a dedicated gaming mode. These are amazing results, but what interested us the most, in the context of everyday use, was how the television handles motion blur and how the image looks at 120 Hz. After all, this is the frequency used today by consoles like PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X/S, and it is desired by sports fans. Generally speaking, the panel "holds up." The matrix is fast enough to meet these challenges, and objects displayed at native 120Hz fluidity are shown correctly. As for the software, the television is equipped with a motion smoothing system, but with a key caveat – it only works for input signals up to 60 Hz. This means it is mainly suitable for classic television, movies, and series. Thanks to this, we can adjust the fluidity of the image to our own preferences – from a very smooth, "theatrical" approach to setting the slider to "zero" and maintaining a fully cinematic character.

The use of a 144 Hz panel in TCL C69K / Q6C is a significant advantage in this price range. It represents an important step forward compared to its predecessor (C655 PRO), which only offered 60 Hz at 4K. The difference is particularly noticeable when watching sports or playing games – the ball, players, or dynamic action in games are displayed more clearly and without losing details. An interesting feature is also the ability of the panel to operate at 240 Hz (which the manufacturer does not officially mention) – we will return to this topic in relation to the PC gaming mode. TCL has also added a feature for movie fans: “Motion Clarity.” This allows users to adjust the picture to their preferences using two simple sliders. We can either keep the visible film frame or opt for very smooth, "

Console compatibility and gaming features

8.2/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 240Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Warning Yes, high input lag
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

For gamers, the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 is, on paper, an almost ideal proposition. It is equipped with two HDMI 2.1 ports, allowing us to unlock (although these options are somewhat hidden in the menu) the full suite of features: ALLM, VRR, and, crucially, the ability to work in 4K at 144 Hz. This last feature should particularly please owners of powerful PCs. The TV also has something akin to a gaming panel – and while it’s hard to call it a full-fledged "Game Bar," it does its job by displaying key information. It’s just a shame that in its default form, it covers a relatively large part of the screen.

However, our biggest issue with this model concerns how the S Pro 2026 handles gaming in HDR mode. To put it bluntly: it doesn’t handle it well. Due to the poorly implemented HGiG function (the HDR tone mapping standard for games), during the initial HDR calibration on the console, it’s very easy to "blow out" the image. If someone is unaware of this software flaw and follows the on-screen instructions, they will simply set the image incorrectly, with burnt-out details in bright areas. Another major problem is the Dolby Vision mode for gaming. While it does work, it generates such a high input lag that it becomes noticeable in dynamic titles. (All our latency measurements can be checked in the paragraph below). In summary: generally, it’s a really good screen for gamers, but with one small caveat. We would rather avoid HDR mode on it – unless we decide to manually adjust the brightness bar on the console "by eye," completely ignoring the instructions from the console's pictogram.

TCL C69K / Q6C is a television that can boldly be called equipment created with gamers in mind. Here we have 4K at 144 Hz, VRR support, automatic game mode (ALLM), and Dolby Vision Gaming. Additionally, there's a practical Game Bar, which is a panel with the most important settings right at hand – useful when we want to quickly change something during gameplay (e.g., aspect ratio: Yes, it’s possible!). The wide range of VRR, reaching up to 240 Hz, is noteworthy. This option is primarily for PC gamers who will lower the resolution below native 4K. In that case, the TV can spread its wings and show additional smoothness, especially in fast esports titles. For consoles, we stick to the classic limit of 120 Hz, but the possibilities are still quite broad. The only drawback is slight motion blur that can sometimes be seen in dynamic scenes. Other than that, C69K / Q6C offers everything gamers expect from a television.

Input lag

8.5/10

9.7/10

SDR

1080p60
17 ms
18 ms
1080p120
8 ms
10 ms
2160p60
17 ms
18 ms
2160p120
8 ms
10 ms

HDR

2160p60
17 ms
17 ms
2160p120
8 ms
11 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
110 ms
17 ms
2160p120 DV
77 ms
9 ms

We move on to one of the most important measurements for gamers, which is input lag. Overall, the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 performs exceptionally well in this regard. Generally, in game mode, the lag is very low. With 120 Hz content (from consoles or PCs), we easily achieved results below 10 ms. These results are truly remarkable and practically imperceptible for most people, even those very sensitive to it. Unfortunately, there is one "but" that poses the greatest issue with this model in gaming. We are talking about the Dolby Vision Gaming mode. When this mode is activated, the input lag rises to an astronomical level of around 100 ms. At such a value, the delay between our movements on the controller (we tested on an Xbox console) and what is displayed on the screen becomes really very large and annoying. Therefore, our recommendation is simple: we absolutely do not recommend using Dolby Vision Gaming mode on this television.

In terms of input lag, TCL C69K / Q6C performs excellently. With 120 Hz content, the delay is around 10 ms, and at times even less. This is a level at which the response is practically instantaneous, and it is hard to find any objections. For 60 Hz material, the result is around 18 ms – still a very good outcome, more than sufficient for comfortable gaming.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
8ms
11ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Generally, when it comes to gaming, the S Pro 2026 is a great screen for PC owners. It offers a refresh rate of up to 288 Hz in Full HD resolution or a full 144 Hz in 4K. All of this, supported by technologies like AMD FreeSync and G-Sync, is really a lot for very demanding gamers. And how about "desktop" work? Here we have positive news as well. Although the displayed font may not be perfectly sharp (like on a dedicated PC monitor with an IPS panel), it is presented in a really pleasant and readable way. This is due to the proper implementation of Chroma 4:4:4 sampling, which ensures that text is clear and there are no issues with color fringing.

As a computer monitor, TCL C69K / Q6C performs excellently. At native resolution, we achieve 4K at 144 Hz, and by lowering the resolution, we can even reach 240 Hz. The television also works with Nvidia and AMD cards, supporting both G-Sync and FreeSync. It's hard to have any reservations for office work as well. Thanks to 4:4:4 chroma support, fonts are sharp and readable, and any minor imperfections are so small that they go unnoticed in everyday use.

Viewing angles

3.7/10

3/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
66%
78%

As for a TV equipped with a VA panel, we must admit that the drop in brightness when viewed at an angle is relatively small in the Xiaomi S Pro 2026. However, it is important to keep in mind a second, key aspect – color saturation degrades significantly at an angle. This is typical behavior for TVs with a VA panel that do not have additional coatings to widen viewing angles. Is this a flaw of this TV? Not really. It is simply a characteristic, the price we have to pay for the key advantages of a VA panel in the form of its high native contrast.

In the TCL C69K / Q6C, the viewing angles are typical for a VA panel. Sitting directly in front, the picture looks very good, but any shift to the side results in a noticeable drop in color saturation and brightness. The difference is particularly evident in colorful scenes – the colors become washed out, and the contrast loses its depth. Compared to IPS panels, this is clearly a weaker performance, although it is compensated by better black levels and higher native contrast.

Daytime performance

7.4/10

6.4/10

Panel finish
Glare
Satin
Reflection suppression
Average
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Panel brightness

TCL C69K / Q6C: 532 cd/m2

Xiaomi S Pro 2026: 771 cd/m2

Due to its very high peak brightness, the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 performs really well in brightly lit rooms. In most scenarios, it is able to "break through" even very strong lighting in the room. However, it should be noted that the matrix used here quite poorly suppresses reflections. This means that in darker areas of the image, or when the TV is displaying a dark scene, direct reflections (e.g., the reflection of a window or lamp) can be annoying. Nevertheless, the S Pro 2026, as a TV for a bright living room, performs really well thanks to its powerful brightness.

In bright lighting conditions, TCL C69K / Q6C performs quite well. The panel offers decent brightness (in SDR content it reaches about 550 nits), which allows for comfortable TV viewing in a moderately lit living room, and even on days when strong light comes through the windows. This means that daytime viewing does not require completely darkening the room. Another plus is that the screen coating does quite well at reducing reflections, so the TV does not become a "mirror" even in bright light. However, this is not at the level of top models with more advanced anti-reflective coatings – in very challenging conditions (e.g., with large windows), reflections will be noticeable.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED PFS LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
UKN1.240806.107.V816.0.25.6.6.ULBMIXM
V8-T653T01-LF1V531.002396
Image processor
mt5896 2,5gb ram
MT5896 2,5GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 TV Panel details
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV Panel details

Xiaomi S Pro 2026

TCL C69K / Q6C

TV features

7.2/10

7/10

  • HDMI inputs
    1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 TV features
Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 TV features
Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features

Operating System (Google TV)

A significant advantage of the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 is undoubtedly the presence of the Google TV system. This gives us access to a massive library of applications – we can find literally everything here, from leading VOD platforms to niche players. The system also offers a multitude of useful features, such as built-in Chromecast, support for AirPlay and Screen Mirroring, and an efficiently working voice search. The Google TV system itself is great, but one must take a slight caution regarding its implementation by Xiaomi. During our tests, it experienced a proverbial "hitch." Animations could lag a bit, and the response to commands wasn't immediate. This is definitely not the level of fluidity that we know from top, significantly more expensive models equipped with more powerful processors.

TV Features and Connectivity

So how does the S Pro 2026 perform as a "conventional" television? Unfortunately, we have less good news here. In terms of classic TV viewing, we can mainly praise this model for having a convenient remote control with a numeric keypad – which (surprisingly) is not a standard today. However, this is where the conveniences end. We won't find either USB recording (PVR) capabilities or PiP (Picture-in-Picture) options. On the plus side, we credit the extensive Bluetooth connectivity options. We had no trouble connecting external devices to the TV, such as wireless headphones, a keyboard, or a mouse, which significantly facilitates operation.

Multimedia Features: Google TV

The Google TV system is undoubtedly the strongest user aspect of TCL C69K / Q6C. It gives the television character and provides an advantage over many competitors. We get the full package of services here: from support for popular streaming applications, through support for screen mirroring, to AirPlay (so iPhone users will feel right at home). In addition, there is Google Assistant, recently in the Gemini AI version, which not only answers questions but also efficiently performs simple commands (e.g., changing the channel or searching for content in VOD). The system itself operates quite responsively. However, it is worth mentioning a certain drawback: the awkward translations in the Polish menu can provoke a smile, but sometimes require a moment of thought to decipher their meaning.

Classic Features

In terms of classic TV features, TCL C69K / Q6C is rather average. We won’t find USB recording or PiP mode here, which may disappoint some users. However, the manufacturer did not forget about the basics: teletext TV and a readable EPG are available, which still matter to some users. In everyday use, the support for external audio devices via Bluetooth is also useful. It’s a simple way to connect, for example, a speaker or headphones, which can be a practical solution for seniors. Beyond that, however, it is difficult to find elements that would distinguish C69K / Q6C from competitors – it’s simply a solid but standard package of basic functions.

Apps

9.6/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

6.8/10

8.9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in, default media player in the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 is – given the capabilities of the Google TV system – simply weak. Its biggest drawback is that it does not support characters other than those from the standard alphabet. Consequently, it does not display, among other things, Polish fonts in subtitles or file names. Fortunately, as we mentioned before, the heart of the television is Google TV. This system allows for the instant installation of an external, significantly better player, such as VLC or Kodi. For this television, we recommend installing an alternative player immediately after the first startup.

The built-in media player in TCL C69K / Q6C performs really well – practically all popular file formats work without major issues. There are some minor exceptions, particularly with less common codecs or unusual video file configurations, but in everyday use, this is rarely noticeable. The biggest advantage, however, is that the television runs on Google TV, which provides complete freedom in choosing additional software. If someone encounters a file that the standard player does not support, it is enough to install an alternative – like VLC – and the problem disappears.

Sound

7.1/10

6.5/10

  • Maximum volume
    82dB
    -
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

We must admit that the S Pro 2026 surprised us quite positively. The television is equipped with a 30W speaker system that, for its class, sounds really very good. There is even a noticeable slight hint of bass, and the mid and high tones are quite well balanced. Of course, all of this is within the capabilities provided by the television's speakers, but it is a level we did not expect from such a relatively inexpensive model. A huge plus is also the support for top audio technologies. The television is capable of decoding not only the very popular Dolby Atmos format but also the recently quite rare DTS:X, which we mainly find on Blu-ray discs.

In terms of audio, TCL C69K / Q6C performs quite well. The manufacturer has been boasting about its collaboration with Onkyo for several years, and this indeed translates into sound quality. The sound is pleasant, with clear mid-tones and quite a clean high end, and overall it feels well balanced. Of course, this will not replace a full-fledged soundbar, especially in terms of bass depth, but for built-in speakers in a television from this price segment – it is really very good.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

82dBC (Max)

75dBC

No acoustic data