XIAOMI A PRO 2026 vs Philips PUS7000

Direct comparison

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.6

5.3

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.0

    4.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.7

    5.7

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.7

    4.9

  • Gaming on console

    6.2

    6.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    5.8

  • Watching in bright light

    4.9

    3.5

  • Utility functions

    6.1

    5.0

  • Apps

    9.6

    6.7

  • Sound quality

    5.0

    5.8

Advantages

  • VA matrix with good native contrast and decent black levels

  • Support for Game Boost mode at 120 Hz in 1080p and 1440p

  • Low input lag in 120 Hz mode

  • Google TV – a vast selection of apps and services

  • Wide color gamut coverage (about 94% DCI-P3)

  • Decent colors after SDR mode calibration

  • Support for popular audio formats (Dolby Atmos, DTS:X)

  • Large, clear remote control with a numeric keypad – convenient for seniors

  • Attractive price

  • High contrast VA panel

  • Very low input lag

  • Gaming features – presence of VRR, ALLM, and a dedicated Game Bar

  • HDR10+ support

  • Quite decent image processing (for such a cheap TV)

  • Good readability of fonts – will work well as a large monitor

  • Backlit remote control with numeric keypad

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness

  • No real support for HDR10+ and other more advanced HDR formats (e.g., Dolby Vision)

  • Significant limitations when working with PC – lack of chroma 4:4:4, heavy dithering, poor font readability

  • Poor viewing angles (typical for VA)

  • Clunky design, legs mounted in plastic with screws

  • Weird system issues – stuttering, errors with Miracast and audio switching

  • Upscaling and digital image processing are practically nonexistent

  • Very poor sound, practically no bass (we felt it performed worse than the "2025" model)

  • Very low brightness – 200 nits

  • No Ambilight

  • Lack of any features to improve fluidity makes the image very "raw"

  • Titan OS system – the interface is slow, and it lacks many popular applications

  • The remote works with infrared

Our verdict

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a television that at first glance doesn’t reveal significant changes compared to its predecessor. Someone might even think it's just a copy of last year's model with a different sticker. And there’s some truth to that, as the main novelty, or rather the only clear difference, is the 120 Hz mode at lower resolutions. It must be acknowledged that this addition really does make a difference – it's not a solution for professional gamers, but rather a nod towards those looking for a smoother picture during casual gaming. This is where the A Pro 2026 can shine – with a simple, yet clever idea that sets it apart in the "super budget" segment. Unfortunately, when we begin to look at the television more broadly, enthusiasm quickly wanes. Even though the year has changed in the calendar, most of the issues known from the A Pro 2025 remain with us – the system can still experience strange stutters, and occasional bugs can be quite annoying. Additionally, there is a lack of any serious tools for digital image processing that worked quite decently last year. As a result, there are many construction limitations visible here that competitors at a similar price point are already trying to mask in some way. As for the quality of the image, we won't be dishonest with you either. Brightness levels of 200–300 nits don't stand a chance against more demanding materials. Yes, simpler streaming content can be watched, but with high-budget productions, it’s immediately clear why the television costs what it does. The impression of watching a flattened image stripped of details accompanies us virtually every time. And here we come to the crux of the matter. Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a television for those who really do not require much. As a daily screen for series, news, or YouTube – it performs fairly well, especially thanks to its operating system, which is GoogleTV. Also, if someone is looking for budget equipment and additionally would like a taste of smoother gameplay in games thanks to the 120 Hz mode, they might even be satisfied. But anyone expecting at least average image quality, a stable system, and proper functionality will quickly notice that there are other budget models on the market that simply perform better.

If you are looking for a specific reason to buy the Philips PUS7000, it is essentially just the price. This model is meant to be primarily inexpensive, and it fulfills that role perfectly. It could be a decent choice for someone who is still using an old Full HD screen and wants to finally switch to 4K without emptying their wallet. Interestingly, even though this is a "budget 60 Hz" model, Philips has not forgotten about gamers. We get VRR and ALLM, which significantly enhance the gaming experience when connected to a console, making everything quite responsive. But... well, the biggest problem with this TV is brightness, or rather, the lack of it. 200 nits is an output that makes the PUS7000 simply capitulate on a sunny day. The image will be pale and unclear even though it features a high-contrast VA panel. HDR here is basically just a label on the box. With such a dark panel, HDR content looks artificial and simply lacks the necessary intensity, so it’s better to forget about it and stick with regular SDR. Is it worth buying? At this price point, every manufacturer makes similar compromises, so the PUS7000 does not drastically fall behind the rest of the budget screens. The only question is whether you can get along with the Titan OS, which is still a bit raw and lacks many apps that are standard among competitors. With today’s prices, where Chinese brands like TCL and Hisense are flooding the market with QLEDs and Mini-LEDs, the Philips PUS7000 faces a really tough battle. If you care about a well-known brand logo and a low price: you can go for it. However, if you are looking for image quality… you’d better double-check your budget before purchasing.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Budget
Average
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Black
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

6.1/10

5.9/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,000:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,550:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

7,300:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,600:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,900:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,500:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,550:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

One of the biggest advantages of even a budget construction like the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is the use of a VA panel. It is responsible for quite decent contrast, which in our measurements fluctuated between 5000:1 and 7000:1. On the screen, this translates to a stable image with fairly deep blacks—something that is hard to find in competing models with IPS panels without local dimming. Xiaomi has also added the feature of global dimming for the entire panel. Sounds good, but... we advise you to turn it off right away. Why? Because the screen starts behaving very strangely in darker scenes—sometimes it dims so much that you can hardly see anything, and at other times it brightens up so much that the already dark blue black turns into a vivid blue. At that point, we had the impression that the TV was simply damaged. Fortunately, without this feature, the contrast presents itself really solidly. It is certainly not at the level of advanced TVs with local dimming, but in its price class, it will comfortably satisfy most users—especially if you are not watching in a completely dark room, but have at least a little light in the background, which effectively masks the imperfections of the "blue black."

The model PUS7000 we tested in the 55-inch size is equipped with a VA panel. This is significant for black quality, as in such budget constructions we do not find local dimming systems that could assist the screen in dark scenes. Therefore, all the work rests on the panel itself, which, thanks to its characteristics, offers a decent contrast of 6000:1. In practice, this translates to much better experiences during evening viewings compared to competing TVs with IPS panels. The black here is better separated from bright elements, making dark parts of the image not appear washed out, and details in shadows remain visible. However, it is worth noting that in completely dark conditions, the black may slightly take on shades of navy blue and will not be as perfectly "pitch black" as in more expensive models. To mitigate this effect and improve depth perception, it is advisable to consider watching the TV with soft, additional lighting in the room. Usually, this issue was somewhat resolved by the well-known Ambilight system from Philips TVs, which, through a glow on the wall, optically increases contrast. Unfortunately, in the PUS7000 model, the manufacturer decided to look for savings, so we do not find this backlighting system here, which is standard in higher series like the PUS8000.

HDR effect quality

4.1/10

3.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 93.6%, Bt.2020: 71.7%
DCI P3: 78.3%, Bt.2020: 57.1%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

220 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

248 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

322 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

315 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

326 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

197 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

209 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

230 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips PUS7000

XIAOMI A PRO 2026

If you are hoping for a cinematic HDR effect in the new Xiaomi A Pro 2026, you better quickly cool your expectations. This TV is simply too dark to fully convey the capabilities of contemporary movies or series prepared for the highest quality picture. Our measurements showed brightness in the range of 200-300 nits, which are values that suit SDR content more than ambitious HDR productions. In practice, this means that most movies look okay, but they definitely won’t give you the "wow" effect that other TVs deliver. Fortunately, not everything is lost – a plus here is the use of the PFS LED filter, which is a solution similar to the quantum dot known from QLEDs. Thanks to this, the coverage of the DCI-P3 color gamut reaches about 94%, resulting in vibrant, saturated colors in the vast majority of materials.

Unfortunately, the PUS7000 is not suitable for watching HDR content. This screen is simply too dark. A brightness level of 200 nits is not enough to correctly display such a format. Even if a HDR signal message appears on the screen, the image will resemble a regular SDR recording. Therefore, it's better to stick with the latter format to avoid issues in displaying bright scenes, which you can read about below. The situation is not improved by the fact that this is a classic LCD model without additional layers to enhance colors, such as QLED or PFS. As a result, colors in HDR may appear washed out. Ultimately, this gives a worse effect than in the standard SDR format, which is simply better suited to the capabilities of this panel.

Factory color reproduction

3.5/10

5.3/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

What we saw in Filmmaker mode surprised us greatly – and unfortunately not in a good way. The mode advertised as Hollywood standard resembled more of a display in a store window. The white balance was shifted towards blue, leading to huge color errors and the effect of washed-out scenes in SDR content. It was a little better, though far from perfect, in HDR materials. There, problems were also visible – color saturation and the entire palette consistently shifted towards cooler tones, which made the image appear more artificial and cold rather than cinematic. In other words: even in Filmmaker mode, which should be the showcase of this television, we got a result far from expectations.

We tested the television in movie mode, which theoretically should provide the best and most natural colors. And indeed, this mode is quite correct; however, after connecting the calibration equipment, its biggest flaw became apparent. The PUS7000 has significant deficiencies in displaying red. Poorly tuned white balance and too low saturation of this color cause the image to appear too cool. As a result, one might get the impression that the displayed content is simply lacking in vibrant colors. The situation is exacerbated by the fact that both SDR and HDR content are excessively brightened. This is confirmed by the gamma curve and EOTF graphs, which show that the television displays the image brighter than it should. This causes scenes to lose their depth and may appear somewhat washed out. Fortunately, the Philips menu offers many functions to improve these aspects, so we immediately proceeded to calibration to see what could be squeezed out of this screen.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

7/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Even though Xiaomi is not a brand associated with top-of-the-line televisions, it must be acknowledged that even in a budget model like the A Pro 2026, the manufacturer left quite a few calibration settings. After a few adjustments, the SDR picture gained a completely new character. The colors stopped veering into blue tones, the whites became more natural, and most errors dropped to a practically invisible level. As a result, SDR content looked very good, surprisingly so for this price range.

It was somewhat different with HDR material. Here, it was immediately noticeable what we had already mentioned - the overexposure of bright scenes and issues with balance control. Calibration only helped partially because the limitations of the panel itself played a role. However, it should be emphasized that in the case of SDR, the television transformed beyond recognition, and in a decidedly positive direction.

After professional calibration, it is clear that the PUS7000 responds well to image adjustments. In this price range, this is not a given. The effects should be assessed in two scenarios, depending on what content we plan to watch. SDR performs the best. After our corrections, the image looks really good. Most color errors fell below level 3, which is the threshold at which distortions typically become visible to the naked eye in measurements. Movies, series, sports, and regular television present themselves naturally, without unpleasant deviations. If someone primarily watches classic channels or streaming in HD quality, the difference after calibration will be noticeable immediately. However, it must be made clear that the PUS7000 is still not a television suitable for sensible HDR, and calibration does not change much here. The reason lies in the hardware: colors remain too undersaturated. The television lacks solutions that expand the color gamut, such as PFS filters or a quantum dot layer, so the panel simply cannot show the intense colors required by HDR. This is most evident in reds, which still look pale. This limitation cannot be bypassed with menu settings, as it results from the design of the backlighting and the panel itself.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.3/10

6/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The television really handles color blending well, and in most scenes, it's hard to find any imperfections. This is best seen in the bright parts of films, where tonal transitions look almost perfect, making the image smooth and natural. Darker scenes are a bit worse; in them, characteristic banding can be noticed. Fortunately, this is not a flaw that stands out and will remain virtually unnoticed by most viewers.

In terms of color gradation in bright scenes, the PUS7000 model performs surprisingly well. It's hard to have any major complaints here. The color transitions are natural and smooth, so there are no disturbing bands or jumps between shades on a bright background. When watching cheerful scenes, nothing should distract your attention from the screen. However, the situation changes dramatically when darker shades of gray or simply very dark colors appear on the screen. Unfortunately, you can then see quite strong "stepping" of colors. Instead of smooth transitions, you get clear cuts between individual tones. In dark, atmospheric films, this can be quite annoying and distract from the viewing experience, as the tonal transitions are not as clean as in the bright parts of the image.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

3/10

6.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
No
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Upscaling and digital image processing in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 are not among the strengths of this model. One might expect that since the TV wasn’t designed to achieve record brightness levels, the manufacturer would have opted for a more robust processor and a set of features that would "enhance" lower quality images. Unfortunately – we were also quite disappointed here. On the plus side, there is reasonably decent upscaling that handles HD materials and elevates them to 4K in an acceptable manner. However, this is where the list of advantages ends. The TV does not offer any features to improve tonal transitions or smooth out digital imperfections, so in most cases, we get a raw image, exactly as we deliver from an external source. On a large screen, this lack of support makes lower quality materials look simply bland. An additional problem is the phenomenon of overscan. When watching older materials, it sometimes happens that part of the image is cut off, which only intensifies the impression that Xiaomi still has a lot to catch up on in this category.

The PUS7000 handles digital image processing quite well. The distortion reduction feature deserves praise, as it effectively smooths out unwanted tonal transitions even at a low setting. However, it has a flaw: if the action is too aggressive, it can introduce undesirable artifacts on the screen. It’s a good idea to experiment with this setting to find the sweet spot between a smooth image and detail clarity.

The upscaling, which is the enhancement of lower quality materials to 4K, is adequate. The image after processing is very "soft," which is typical for almost all Philips televisions. The edges are plastic and smooth, making the image look cohesive. If someone finds it too soft, it can always be adjusted with the sharpness slider in the menu to achieve a more pronounced effect.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.5/10

3.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
No
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
No
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (1440p@120Hz):

Blur ():

The motion fluidity in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is an interesting compromise that results from the hybrid matrix used here. At the native resolution of 4K, the maximum refresh rate is 60 Hz – sufficient for those who mainly watch movies and series. It is precisely for them that the manufacturer added a motion smoother, allowing users to adjust the image to their own preferences – one can opt for greater fluidity or leave the more "cinematic" frames depending on the settings.

In this regard, we don't really have any good news. It might seem that the biggest downside is the lack of a 120 Hz panel, but in this price range, that's actually standard, and it's hard to expect more. However, the worst part is that the TV does not have any motion smoothing features. There are no supporting systems for either movies or sports. We have to accept that the image on the PUS7000 is processed "raw." This means that during dynamic scenes or fast camera movements, the motion may appear choppy or unclear. We have no way to enable any smoother that would soften this effect.

Console compatibility and gaming features

3.6/10

4.7/10

  • ALLM
    No
    Yes
  • VRR
    No
    Yes
  • VRR range
    No
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Indeed – since Xiaomi has added the "Game Boost 120 Hz" feature here, one might expect that they would follow up with a solid gaming package. Unfortunately, reality quickly dampens that enthusiasm. Aside from this mode (which, it must be said, is a great addition in a budget build), we have just a rather bizarre player panel. It's hard to call it a fully-fledged "game bar" – it's more of a simple overlay on the TV Menu with limited options. And that would be about it. There is no ALLM, so the TV won't automatically switch to game mode. There is no VRR, so you can forget about smooth frame synchronization. We also won't find support for Dolby Vision in games or the HGiG format, which are becoming increasingly standard on consoles. In short: apart from Game Boost 120 Hz, which does indeed make playing more enjoyable in 1080p or 1440p, the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 offers nothing particularly appealing to gamers.

Although the PUS7000 is not marketed as a gaming TV, it does not perform as poorly in this category as one might expect. While there is no support for 120 Hz refresh rates, which is understandable at this price point, the manufacturer has included several important features that genuinely improve the comfort of playing on a console. The most significant of these are VRR and ALLM technologies. VRR is responsible for synchronizing the screen with the number of frames generated by the console. This prevents the image from "tearing" and keeps it consistent even during sudden frame drops in the game. In turn, ALLM is a solution that automatically switches the TV to the lowest latency mode right after detecting a signal from the console. All of these parameters are easily accessible thanks to the Game Bar feature. This is a special control panel for gamers that can be brought up on the screen at any time. It allows for a quick overview of current settings and connection status without interrupting gameplay, which is a very convenient solution.

Input lag

9.5/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
12 ms
1080p120
8 ms
2160p60
25 ms
12 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
25 ms
13 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

The input lag on the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is quite decent and certainly not its weak point. The best results were achieved in 1080p@120 Hz and 1440p@120 Hz modes – there the TV drops below 10 ms, which can easily be called a phenomenal result and sufficient even for more demanding gamers. The situation changes with 60 Hz content – the input lag then rises to around 25 ms. While these may not be the best values on the market, they will be fully acceptable for casual gaming or for an evening console session. Especially since in most cases it is still worth enabling the 120 Hz mode, which is the most beneficial for gamers.

Another plus for gamers is the very low input lag at around 12 ms. In this price range, the result is impressive. The delay is small enough that the response to controller movements feels instantaneous, and in practice, it's hard to notice at all. Gaming remains comfortable even in fast, dynamic titles where every millisecond counts. In this regard, the PUS7000 can keep pace with much more expensive televisions.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

5.8/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
No
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
25ms
12ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 as a computer monitor? There's no beating around the bush – it's very bad. While you can still utilize the 120 Hz mode in lower resolutions for gaming, the TV is completely unsuitable for everyday work. It lacks full support for chroma 4:4:4, so fonts are blurry and sometimes even rainbow-colored. Additionally, there's strong dithering that makes the image look uneven – some pixels shine brighter, others dimmer, and vertical lines can even break apart. In practice, this means that text (especially colored and on a dark background) becomes difficult to read. Light text manages to hold up somewhat, but it's hard to talk about any comfort here. In this category, we give Xiaomi A Pro 2026 a rating of 2/10 (+1 for the additional high refresh rate mode), and there's really no point in dwelling on this any longer.

When it comes to connecting a computer, the gaming options are quite limited. The screen supports a maximum of 60 Hz and does not offer G-Sync technology, so it is not equipment for demanding PC gamers. However, the PUS7000 surprisingly performs well for text work. The readability of the fonts is at a very high level. The TV correctly handles chrominance sampling at 4:4:4. This means that every letter, regardless of its size or color, is displayed sharp and without any distortion at the edges. As a result, office work or browsing the internet on this screen is simply comfortable and does not strain the eyes like some cheap panels that have trouble with clean font rendering.

Viewing angles

3/10

3.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
63%
70%

The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 uses a VA panel, which immediately suggests that viewing angles are not its strong suit. Looking at the screen from the side, we quickly notice a loss of quality – colors noticeably fade, and the whole image appears washed out. The drop in brightness may not be as drastic as in some constructions based on similar technology, but that doesn’t change the fact that this is clearly a weak point of this model. If we plan to use it as a large, cheap screen for the living room, we have to take this limitation into account.

The viewing angles in this model are poor, which results directly from the use of a VA-type panel. Although this panel provides decent contrast, as I mentioned earlier, it has one major drawback: it requires sitting directly in front of the screen. Just slightly shifting to the side is enough for the colors to start losing saturation, and the picture becomes noticeably worse.

Daytime performance

4.9/10

3.5/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

Philips PUS7000: 202 cd/m2

XIAOMI A PRO 2026: 334 cd/m2

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 performs quite well during the day. The display has a satin finish that can somewhat reduce reflections, so the colors do not lose their vibrancy, even when the room is bright. Just keep in mind that this is not a super-bright screen – the average brightness is around 350 nits. In a regular, moderately sunny living room, it's sufficient, but if you have large windows that let in a lot of sunlight, it may simply be difficult without shades or curtains.

In a sunny room, the PUS7000 performs poorly. This is all because the panel is simply dim. A brightness level of 200 nits is a very low score that does not allow for comfortable viewing in bright daylight. On the positive side, the satin screen coating does quite well in reducing reflections. Thanks to it, the panel does not display reflections as prominently, but this is not enough to save the situation. The brightness of this model is too low to cut through strong sunlight, so in very bright rooms, the image will simply be unclear.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
White LED
Software version during testing
UKN1.240806.017.V816.0.25.5.13.621.4.URTMIXM
TPN256E_V056.002.236.141
Image processor
4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1530 MHz

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV Panel details
Review Philips PUS7000 TV Panel details
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV Panel details
Review Philips PUS7000 TV Panel details

XIAOMI A PRO 2026

Philips PUS7000

TV features

6.1/10

5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features

SmartTV - Google TV

The biggest advantage of the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is the Google TV system. It's what gives the TV a second life – you can run practically any app on it, from Netflix and YouTube to music services and even lesser-known programs from the Google Play Store. We are not limited to just what the manufacturer has pre-installed, as is the case with other budget TVs. Additionally, we have AirPlay, voice search through Google Assistant, and even integration with Gemini. We did experience some minor hiccups – for example, casting from a laptop didn’t always work – but despite such shortcomings, Google TV is a huge plus in this setup.

Classic TV Functions

The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 can be referred to as a "senior-friendly" TV. The large remote control with a numeric keypad and a fair number of physical buttons makes it intuitive to operate. Support for teletext and a clear EPG interface make using classic TV functions easier. We won't find many advanced features like USB recording or PiP, but the presence of an analog headphone jack can be surprisingly practical for some users. It gives the impression that this is a set of features tailored to the needs of the most traditional viewers.

System Stability

However, not everything works as it should. During testing, we encountered annoying system stutters, problems with Miracast, and issues when switching audio sources. There were even times when it was necessary to reset the TV by unplugging it. This just shows that although Google TV offers huge possibilities, stability in such a budget-friendly setup can still be very problematic.

Titan OS System

Titan OS is still a fairly new operating system, and unfortunately, this is evident in daily use. Overall, it operates sluggishly, sometimes even clumsily. The response to commands from the remote is slow, which is further complicated by the fact that the device uses infrared connectivity instead of Bluetooth / RF. This means that we have to aim the remote quite precisely at the television for the system to respond at all. During testing, the screen mirroring feature with computers equipped with Windows failed to work again. Fortunately, streaming from Apple devices using AirPlay went smoothly. Another drawback of Titan OS is the very modest app library. The selection is much smaller than in systems like webOS or Tizen, not to mention Google TV, where the choice of programs is almost unlimited.

Classic Features

On the other hand, the PUS7000 might be a good choice for people who mainly watch traditional television. Here we find a properly functioning teletext and a clear EPG interface, which is the electronic program guide. The remote included in the package is backlit, which greatly facilitates operation after dark, and it has standard numeric buttons for quick channel selection. Interestingly, there is a classic headphone jack input. This is a rarely seen addition in new televisions, allowing for the connection of older home theater systems or wired headphones without the need for additional adapters.

Apps

9.6/10

6.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

6.8/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a real enigma. On one hand, it plays most popular audio and video formats without major issues. On the other hand, it can stumble over basic things like Polish letters. Files with characters like ą, ł, ć, or ś in their names often do not want to open or are displayed incorrectly. It looks strange because we supposedly have codec support, yet when it comes to simple matters related to the alphabet, the television just gets confused. Fortunately, this is not a huge problem, as thanks to Google TV, we can simply install another player, such as VLC. Then the issue with Polish letters disappears completely, and using multimedia becomes hassle-free.

The built-in media player works quite well and handles most popular video formats without major issues. The TV easily reads subtitles from files and manages various audio formats, so those who keep movies on a disk or USB drive should not feel limited. The only complaint pertains to the photo browser - not everything worked correctly, and some files, especially at certain resolutions, would not open at all.

Sound

5/10

5.8/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

Last year, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 surprised us with really decent sound for a television in the super budget segment. Unfortunately, this year's edition – the A Pro 2026, has let us down across the board. The sound resembles the impression as if the device was playing underwater: flat, devoid of any bass or depth. The only plus remains the wide support for audio formats such as Dolby Atmos or DTS:X, but in practice, it doesn’t change much. If you're considering this television, you should immediately add a soundbar to the set, because without it, the audio experience will be quite disappointing.

The sound is already at a typical budget level. It is sufficient for news and public affairs programs, but when it comes to movies and music, it quickly lacks depth and bass. At this price range, it's hard to expect something more, so if we care about better experiences, it’s worth considering a soundbar or connecting external audio, even through the headphone output.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

81dBC (Max)

75dBC