XIAOMI A PRO 2026 vs Philips OLED811

Direct comparison

OLED801 / OLED811

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 48”55”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.6

8.1

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.0

    8.5

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.7

    8.7

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.7

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    6.2

    8.9

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    4.9

    6.0

  • Utility functions

    6.1

    7.9

  • Apps

    9.6

    7.7

  • Sound quality

    5.0

    7.6

Advantages

  • VA matrix with good native contrast and decent black levels

  • Support for Game Boost mode at 120 Hz in 1080p and 1440p

  • Low input lag in 120 Hz mode

  • Google TV – a vast selection of apps and services

  • Wide color gamut coverage (about 94% DCI-P3)

  • Decent colors after SDR mode calibration

  • Support for popular audio formats (Dolby Atmos, DTS:X)

  • Large, clear remote control with a numeric keypad – convenient for seniors

  • Three-sided Ambilight that creates a great atmosphere while watching

  • Perfect blacks and outstanding contrast from the OLED panel

  • Strong HDR effect. Brightness around 1500 nits

  • Very good viewing angles

  • Excellent motion clarity (no motion blur)

  • Supports 4K at 165 Hz

  • Four HDMI 2.1 ports

  • Extensive features for gamers

  • Support for multiple audio/video formats (Dolby Vision, Dolby Atmos, HDR10+, DTS)

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness

  • No real support for HDR10+ and other more advanced HDR formats (e.g., Dolby Vision)

  • Significant limitations when working with PC – lack of chroma 4:4:4, heavy dithering, poor font readability

  • Poor viewing angles (typical for VA)

  • Clunky design, legs mounted in plastic with screws

  • Weird system issues – stuttering, errors with Miracast and audio switching

  • Upscaling and digital image processing are practically nonexistent

  • Very poor sound, practically no bass (we felt it performed worse than the "2025" model)

  • Titan OS has a more limited app library compared with Google TV and other competitors

  • An infrared remote that requires pointing at the TV (sometimes responds slowly)

  • Very high input lag in games with Dolby Vision

  • Visible posterization (mainly in bright scenes)

  • Underused image processing capabilities of the Pentonic 800

Our verdict

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a television that at first glance doesn’t reveal significant changes compared to its predecessor. Someone might even think it's just a copy of last year's model with a different sticker. And there’s some truth to that, as the main novelty, or rather the only clear difference, is the 120 Hz mode at lower resolutions. It must be acknowledged that this addition really does make a difference – it's not a solution for professional gamers, but rather a nod towards those looking for a smoother picture during casual gaming. This is where the A Pro 2026 can shine – with a simple, yet clever idea that sets it apart in the "super budget" segment. Unfortunately, when we begin to look at the television more broadly, enthusiasm quickly wanes. Even though the year has changed in the calendar, most of the issues known from the A Pro 2025 remain with us – the system can still experience strange stutters, and occasional bugs can be quite annoying. Additionally, there is a lack of any serious tools for digital image processing that worked quite decently last year. As a result, there are many construction limitations visible here that competitors at a similar price point are already trying to mask in some way. As for the quality of the image, we won't be dishonest with you either. Brightness levels of 200–300 nits don't stand a chance against more demanding materials. Yes, simpler streaming content can be watched, but with high-budget productions, it’s immediately clear why the television costs what it does. The impression of watching a flattened image stripped of details accompanies us virtually every time. And here we come to the crux of the matter. Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a television for those who really do not require much. As a daily screen for series, news, or YouTube – it performs fairly well, especially thanks to its operating system, which is GoogleTV. Also, if someone is looking for budget equipment and additionally would like a taste of smoother gameplay in games thanks to the 120 Hz mode, they might even be satisfied. But anyone expecting at least average image quality, a stable system, and proper functionality will quickly notice that there are other budget models on the market that simply perform better.

The Philips OLED811 is a mid-range OLED TV for 2026 that stands out from its biggest rivals primarily because of one feature: Ambilight. By projecting light that follows the on-screen action onto the wall behind the TV, Ambilight can transform the atmosphere of an entire viewing session. In the evening, the picture seems to extend beyond the edges of the screen, making everything you watch feel that little bit more special. For some, it will simply be a nice extra; for others, it will be reason enough to choose a Philips TV once again.

Picture quality is very similar to what you get from models such as the LG C6 or Samsung S90H, at least in versions using the same type of panel. You can therefore expect deep, perfect blacks that make bright highlights look particularly impressive. The OLED811 is capable of delivering impactful HDR, and importantly, once calibrated, its picture comes close to reference quality. It does not have a major advantage over its competitors in this respect, but choosing Philips for Ambilight does not mean sacrificing picture quality either.

Gamers will also find several worthwhile improvements over last year’s model. Thanks to the MediaTek Pentonic 800 chipset, the TV finally offers four HDMI 2.1 ports. This means that connecting several devices—such as consoles, a PC and a soundbar—no longer forces you to decide which one gets access to the full capabilities of the interface. Gaming itself is highly enjoyable: the TV responds quickly, supports variable refresh rates and allows PC users to play in 4K at up to 165 Hz. It is only a shame that the new processor’s capabilities have not been put to equally good use when handling lower-quality content.

The operating system, however, raises the most concerns. Titan OS has replaced the well-liked Google TV platform, and although it has clearly improved over the past year, it is still difficult to see the change as a positive one. Admittedly, the system now runs more smoothly, offers more useful features and includes most popular streaming services in its app library. Nevertheless, the selection of apps remains far more limited than on Google TV and competing platforms. In our view, this is still the OLED811’s biggest weakness. The difference will be particularly noticeable to viewers who use less mainstream services.

Is it worth buying? Yes—provided that Titan OS meets your needs. In terms of picture quality and gaming features, the OLED811 offers just as much as its competitors, while Ambilight gives it something no rival can match. Philips therefore gives with one hand and takes with the other: it adds a uniquely immersive viewing atmosphere but limits your freedom when it comes to choosing apps. If all the services you use are available, this may well be a compromise worth making.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Budget
Good
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Black
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Swivel
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

6.1/10

10/10

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,000:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,550:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

7,300:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,600:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,900:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

One of the biggest advantages of even a budget construction like the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is the use of a VA panel. It is responsible for quite decent contrast, which in our measurements fluctuated between 5000:1 and 7000:1. On the screen, this translates to a stable image with fairly deep blacks—something that is hard to find in competing models with IPS panels without local dimming. Xiaomi has also added the feature of global dimming for the entire panel. Sounds good, but... we advise you to turn it off right away. Why? Because the screen starts behaving very strangely in darker scenes—sometimes it dims so much that you can hardly see anything, and at other times it brightens up so much that the already dark blue black turns into a vivid blue. At that point, we had the impression that the TV was simply damaged. Fortunately, without this feature, the contrast presents itself really solidly. It is certainly not at the level of advanced TVs with local dimming, but in its price class, it will comfortably satisfy most users—especially if you are not watching in a completely dark room, but have at least a little light in the background, which effectively masks the imperfections of the "blue black."

Black level and contrast are areas where the Philips OLED811 showcases all the strengths of OLED technology. Each pixel lights independently and can be turned completely off, so black is simply black. No gray halo or blooming around bright objects. In evening viewing this delivers a great effect: stars in the night sky, city lights, and text on dark backgrounds remain clearly separated from perfectly black surroundings.

So you shouldn't expect improvements here compared with other OLEDs, because in terms of black depth and contrast the result is already exemplary. The OLED811 doesn't need local dimming or any compromise between the brightness of a small object and the black around it. Even a single bright point can sit next to a completely switched-off pixel, giving the picture outstanding depth.

This is exactly where the advantage over Mini LED TVs becomes apparent in scenes with lots of black. Even the most advanced local dimming systems control larger areas of the image, so in demanding shots they can produce a halo around bright elements or dim them to preserve a dark background. The Philips OLED811 doesn't have that problem.

HDR effect quality

4.1/10

7.6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 93.6%, Bt.2020: 71.7%
DCI P3: 99.0%, Bt.2020: 74.5%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

220 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

248 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

322 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

315 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

326 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1225 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1310 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1443 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1368 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

626 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips OLED811

XIAOMI A PRO 2026

Luminance of RGB colors

If you are hoping for a cinematic HDR effect in the new Xiaomi A Pro 2026, you better quickly cool your expectations. This TV is simply too dark to fully convey the capabilities of contemporary movies or series prepared for the highest quality picture. Our measurements showed brightness in the range of 200-300 nits, which are values that suit SDR content more than ambitious HDR productions. In practice, this means that most movies look okay, but they definitely won’t give you the "wow" effect that other TVs deliver. Fortunately, not everything is lost – a plus here is the use of the PFS LED filter, which is a solution similar to the quantum dot known from QLEDs. Thanks to this, the coverage of the DCI-P3 color gamut reaches about 94%, resulting in vibrant, saturated colors in the vast majority of materials.

Philips OLED811 uses the new generation WOLED EX panels, also found in models like the LG C6 and Samsung S90H. After calibration we measured around 1500 nits, which is a very good result for an OLED TV. You can see it clearly in movies and series. All kinds of light flashes have the right intensity, especially when they appear on a dark background. In such scenes the OLED811 can deliver truly impressive HDR. Of course, that doesn't mean you'll see that peak brightness in every shot. When the screen is filled with a large area of white or a big explosion, brightness falls to around 600 nits. That's still a good result, but those scenes no longer have the same punch as small, bright elements on a dark background. This is a known limitation of OLEDs, and the OLED811 is no exception.

Colors

Aside from HDR brightness, colors also matter, and Philips performs very well here too. It covers almost the entire DCI-P3 gamut, which contains most of the colors used in HDR movies and series. So you get rich reds and lush greens, and while watching it's hard to find major faults in this area. It looks a bit worse with the much wider BT.2020 gamut — its most saturated shades are already beyond the reach of this panel. Added to that is the issue of the white subpixel the WOLED panel uses to help boost brightness. With very bright colors you can see some "whitening": the color is bright but loses some of its saturation. In exactly these situations QD-OLED panels from Samsung Display have the advantage. In most movies and series, however, this won't be something that immediately stands out.

Factory color reproduction

3.5/10

7.8/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

What we saw in Filmmaker mode surprised us greatly – and unfortunately not in a good way. The mode advertised as Hollywood standard resembled more of a display in a store window. The white balance was shifted towards blue, leading to huge color errors and the effect of washed-out scenes in SDR content. It was a little better, though far from perfect, in HDR materials. There, problems were also visible – color saturation and the entire palette consistently shifted towards cooler tones, which made the image appear more artificial and cold rather than cinematic. In other words: even in Filmmaker mode, which should be the showcase of this television, we got a result far from expectations.

The movie mode on the Philips OLED811 is sensibly configured right out of the box. Most color errors are minor, both in SDR and HDR, so you can sit down and watch without first adjusting the settings. There are no major inaccuracies that would immediately pull attention away from the film.

It's not perfect, though. The white balance shows a slight deficiency of red compared with green, so whites and grays can have a faint greenish tint. It's not a strong cast, but measurements clearly show it. There are also small brightness deviations in SDR: some areas of the picture are slightly lifted, and the deepest blacks aren't always rendered evenly. In HDR the TV tracks the reference much more closely, although in places it slightly pulls details out of the shadows. These are generally things to refine. The factory movie mode provides a good starting point, and calibration will show how much more you can get out of it.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

9.3/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Even though Xiaomi is not a brand associated with top-of-the-line televisions, it must be acknowledged that even in a budget model like the A Pro 2026, the manufacturer left quite a few calibration settings. After a few adjustments, the SDR picture gained a completely new character. The colors stopped veering into blue tones, the whites became more natural, and most errors dropped to a practically invisible level. As a result, SDR content looked very good, surprisingly so for this price range.

It was somewhat different with HDR material. Here, it was immediately noticeable what we had already mentioned - the overexposure of bright scenes and issues with balance control. Calibration only helped partially because the limitations of the panel itself played a role. However, it should be emphasized that in the case of SDR, the television transformed beyond recognition, and in a decidedly positive direction.

After calibration the Philips OLED811 produces an image very close to the reference. We managed to even out the white balance and remove the subtle color cast visible in the factory settings. Errors in Color Checker measurements for SDR and HDR dropped to around 1 to 2, and many samples even fall below 1. That's a level at which it's hard to spot differences from the reference image with the naked eye. We also improved the gamma, and only in the brightest whites a slight brightening remains. In HDR the EOTF curve also stays close to the reference, although the TV still tends to slightly boost the brightness of small elements like stars or subtitles. That gives the image a bit of extra glow that shouldn't be there, but otherwise there's little to complain about. It was already good out of the box, and after calibration we managed to refine most of the remaining shortcomings.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.3/10

7.5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The television really handles color blending well, and in most scenes, it's hard to find any imperfections. This is best seen in the bright parts of films, where tonal transitions look almost perfect, making the image smooth and natural. Darker scenes are a bit worse; in them, characteristic banding can be noticed. Fortunately, this is not a flaw that stands out and will remain virtually unnoticed by most viewers.

Compared with Philips’ previous OLEDs, the smoothness of tonal transitions has clearly improved. The biggest difference is visible in the dark parts of the image, which can give WOLED panels a lot of trouble. On the OLED811 they have been smoothed out very well; tones transition smoothly from one to another without obvious banding or visible steps. That’s a big plus, especially when watching dark scenes. Unfortunately, it’s not as good in brighter scenes. This is where we have the biggest reservations: instead of smooth transitions between tones you can sometimes see distinct boundaries, a posterization effect. It can be noticeable, and it’s a shame that the improvement seen in dark scenes didn’t extend to the bright areas to the same degree.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

3/10

6.8/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
No
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Upscaling and digital image processing in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 are not among the strengths of this model. One might expect that since the TV wasn’t designed to achieve record brightness levels, the manufacturer would have opted for a more robust processor and a set of features that would "enhance" lower quality images. Unfortunately – we were also quite disappointed here. On the plus side, there is reasonably decent upscaling that handles HD materials and elevates them to 4K in an acceptable manner. However, this is where the list of advantages ends. The TV does not offer any features to improve tonal transitions or smooth out digital imperfections, so in most cases, we get a raw image, exactly as we deliver from an external source. On a large screen, this lack of support makes lower quality materials look simply bland. An additional problem is the phenomenon of overscan. When watching older materials, it sometimes happens that part of the image is cut off, which only intensifies the impression that Xiaomi still has a lot to catch up on in this category.

The OLED811 handles lower-quality content reasonably well, though it's far from perfect. The "Artifact Reduction" feature helps smooth tonal transitions and on the low setting delivers a pretty good result. It doesn't remove banding between shades as effectively as similar solutions from some competitors, but at least it doesn't introduce new artifacts. That's a sensible setting for everyday viewing. Still, there's some disappointment, because the MediaTek Pentonic 800 chip used here can, in other manufacturers' implementations, deal more effectively with heavy compression even at similarly low settings. A lot therefore depends on how each manufacturer uses its capabilities. We have a few more reservations about the 4K upscaling itself. There is plenty of detail, but the overall image looks fairly soft. Edges are heavily smoothed, which robs the picture of some sharpness and clarity. You can partly correct that with the sharpness slider in the menu, though that will just emphasize outlines rather than recover detail. On the plus side, there is no overscan, so even with an SD signal the TV does not crop the edges of the picture.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.5/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
165Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (1440p@120Hz):

Blur (4K@165Hz ):

The motion fluidity in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is an interesting compromise that results from the hybrid matrix used here. At the native resolution of 4K, the maximum refresh rate is 60 Hz – sufficient for those who mainly watch movies and series. It is precisely for them that the manufacturer added a motion smoother, allowing users to adjust the image to their own preferences – one can opt for greater fluidity or leave the more "cinematic" frames depending on the settings.

In terms of motion handling, the OLED811 performs excellently. At 120 Hz, which is useful for console gaming and watching sports, the image stays clear and moving objects don’t leave noticeable trails. The fast response of OLED pixels helps here; you can see it clearly in the UFO test, even on dark backgrounds. There are also motion-smoothing controls. For movies you can adjust the strength of smoothing to your taste, ranging from preserving a cinematic feel to much smoother motion. A separate motion blur reduction control is useful for fast-paced content like live sports broadcasts.

Console compatibility and gaming features

3.6/10

9.5/10

  • ALLM
    No
    Yes
  • VRR
    No
    Yes
  • VRR range
    No
    48 - 165Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Warning Yes, high input lag
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Indeed – since Xiaomi has added the "Game Boost 120 Hz" feature here, one might expect that they would follow up with a solid gaming package. Unfortunately, reality quickly dampens that enthusiasm. Aside from this mode (which, it must be said, is a great addition in a budget build), we have just a rather bizarre player panel. It's hard to call it a fully-fledged "game bar" – it's more of a simple overlay on the TV Menu with limited options. And that would be about it. There is no ALLM, so the TV won't automatically switch to game mode. There is no VRR, so you can forget about smooth frame synchronization. We also won't find support for Dolby Vision in games or the HGiG format, which are becoming increasingly standard on consoles. In short: apart from Game Boost 120 Hz, which does indeed make playing more enjoyable in 1080p or 1440p, the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 offers nothing particularly appealing to gamers.

OLED811 has almost everything you could expect from a gaming TV. It supports 120 Hz at Full HD, 1440p and 4K resolutions, and when connected to a PC can reach 165 Hz. It also has VRR, which helps avoid screen tearing with variable frame rates, and ALLM, which automatically switches to game mode. So you don't have to dig into the settings every time you power up your console.

HGiG also works correctly, so once you enable HDR on the console the TV doesn't apply its own brightness adjustments. There's also a Game Bar that lets you check signal parameters and quickly change settings useful while gaming. The list even includes Dolby Vision for games, but there's a significant catch, which you'll read about below.

Input lag

9.5/10

8.8/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
14 ms
1080p120
8 ms
5 ms
2160p60
25 ms
14 ms
2160p120
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
25 ms
14 ms
2160p120
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
157 ms
2160p120 DV
57 ms

The input lag on the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is quite decent and certainly not its weak point. The best results were achieved in 1080p@120 Hz and 1440p@120 Hz modes – there the TV drops below 10 ms, which can easily be called a phenomenal result and sufficient even for more demanding gamers. The situation changes with 60 Hz content – the input lag then rises to around 25 ms. While these may not be the best values on the market, they will be fully acceptable for casual gaming or for an evening console session. Especially since in most cases it is still worth enabling the 120 Hz mode, which is the most beneficial for gamers.

OLED811 responds instantly. We measured 14 ms at 60 Hz and just 5 ms at 120 Hz, both in Full HD and 4K. Those are excellent results that let you comfortably play even fast-paced online titles. Unfortunately, enabling Dolby Vision changes things dramatically: at 60 Hz latency rises to 157 ms, and at 120 Hz it’s 57 ms. The first value in particular already means a clearly noticeable delay between input on the controller and the on-screen response. For gaming it’s definitely better to stick with HDR10.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
No
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
25ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGWB
Max refresh rate
60Hz
165Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 as a computer monitor? There's no beating around the bush – it's very bad. While you can still utilize the 120 Hz mode in lower resolutions for gaming, the TV is completely unsuitable for everyday work. It lacks full support for chroma 4:4:4, so fonts are blurry and sometimes even rainbow-colored. Additionally, there's strong dithering that makes the image look uneven – some pixels shine brighter, others dimmer, and vertical lines can even break apart. In practice, this means that text (especially colored and on a dark background) becomes difficult to read. Light text manages to hold up somewhat, but it's hard to talk about any comfort here. In this category, we give Xiaomi A Pro 2026 a rating of 2/10 (+1 for the additional high refresh rate mode), and there's really no point in dwelling on this any longer.

Philips OLED811 works very well with a computer. The manufacturer finally managed to correctly implement 4:4:4 chroma even at maximum resolution and refresh rate. That means small text and colored outlines are legible, without blurring or the rainbow fringing that results from loss of color information. Dark text on dark backgrounds also performs well, which TVs can struggle with. There are still minor imperfections related to the RGWB subpixel layout. Fonts aren't as sharp as on a classic RGB monitor, and with white letters you can see subtle red outlines up close. From a normal viewing distance you hardly notice it, though sitting close to the screen at a desk makes it easier to spot.

The most fun, though, is PC gaming. The combination of 4K at 165 Hz, working G-Sync, and input lag around 5 ms makes the OLED811 excellent for that. If you have a computer that can take advantage of that refresh rate, it's definitely worth hooking it up to the Philips TV.

Viewing angles

3/10

7.8/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
63%
32%

The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 uses a VA panel, which immediately suggests that viewing angles are not its strong suit. Looking at the screen from the side, we quickly notice a loss of quality – colors noticeably fade, and the whole image appears washed out. The drop in brightness may not be as drastic as in some constructions based on similar technology, but that doesn’t change the fact that this is clearly a weak point of this model. If we plan to use it as a large, cheap screen for the living room, we have to take this limitation into account.

Viewing angles on the OLED811 are excellent and among the best on the market. Even sitting well off to the side, you still see the picture with deep blacks and well-saturated colors. That's a big advantage over LCD screens: you don't have to sit exactly in front to enjoy good picture quality.

QD-OLED panels perform even better, preserving colors more accurately at an angle. On the Philips, at wider viewing angles whites shift slightly toward a greenish tint, but the effect is so minor that it's hard to find it bothersome while watching. We'd even say that in this respect we encountered the best WOLED unit we've tested so far.

Daytime performance

4.9/10

6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Glare
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

Philips OLED811: 392 cd/m2

XIAOMI A PRO 2026: 334 cd/m2

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 performs quite well during the day. The display has a satin finish that can somewhat reduce reflections, so the colors do not lose their vibrancy, even when the room is bright. Just keep in mind that this is not a super-bright screen – the average brightness is around 350 nits. In a regular, moderately sunny living room, it's sufficient, but if you have large windows that let in a lot of sunlight, it may simply be difficult without shades or curtains.

OLED811 handles daytime viewing fairly well, though in a very bright living room it already has its limits. Maximum SDR brightness reaches about 600 nits, comparable to the LG C6 or the Samsung S90H, which use the same panel. That's noticeably higher than basic OLEDs and will be more than enough for most people. Keep in mind, however, that this brightness isn't maintained across the whole screen; with a lot of white it drops, and the average of our measurements was about 392 nits.

Direct reflections from windows or lamps can be a bigger problem. The glossy coating reduces them reasonably well, but you can still see them clearly on the screen, especially in dark scenes. It doesn't diffuse them as effectively as matte screens, so placing the TV opposite a large window isn't the best idea. On the plus side, black levels remain very good during the day. In a typical living room the Philips will perform without major issues, but if strong sunlight falls directly on the screen, you'll want blinds.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
WRGB OLED
Software version during testing
UKN1.240806.017.V816.0.25.5.13.621.4.URTMIXM
TPM267E_V167.002.054.151
Image processor
4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1530 MHz

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV Panel details
Review Philips OLED811 TV Panel details

XIAOMI A PRO 2026

Philips OLED811

TV features

6.1/10

7.9/10

  • System
    Google TV
    Titan OS
  • System performance
    Poor
    Good
  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    Yes
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

SmartTV - Google TV

The biggest advantage of the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is the Google TV system. It's what gives the TV a second life – you can run practically any app on it, from Netflix and YouTube to music services and even lesser-known programs from the Google Play Store. We are not limited to just what the manufacturer has pre-installed, as is the case with other budget TVs. Additionally, we have AirPlay, voice search through Google Assistant, and even integration with Gemini. We did experience some minor hiccups – for example, casting from a laptop didn’t always work – but despite such shortcomings, Google TV is a huge plus in this setup.

Classic TV Functions

The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 can be referred to as a "senior-friendly" TV. The large remote control with a numeric keypad and a fair number of physical buttons makes it intuitive to operate. Support for teletext and a clear EPG interface make using classic TV functions easier. We won't find many advanced features like USB recording or PiP, but the presence of an analog headphone jack can be surprisingly practical for some users. It gives the impression that this is a set of features tailored to the needs of the most traditional viewers.

System Stability

However, not everything works as it should. During testing, we encountered annoying system stutters, problems with Miracast, and issues when switching audio sources. There were even times when it was necessary to reset the TV by unplugging it. This just shows that although Google TV offers huge possibilities, stability in such a budget-friendly setup can still be very problematic.

Smart features: Titan OS

It's the Smart TV system that is the most controversial change in the OLED811. Philips dropped the user-favorite Google TV in favor of its own Titan OS. For many people this may be hard to accept, although Titan has been getting better every year and runs noticeably smoother. We have working AirPlay, screen mirroring from a computer, and voice search in Polish. System responsiveness has improved too, though minor delays still occur when navigating menus. We suspect the infrared remote is partly to blame, as it doesn't always register commands immediately. The biggest limitation compared with Google TV remains a smaller app selection. That doesn't mean it's empty — you'll find Netflix, Prime Video, Disney+, CANAL+, and Apple TV was recently added to the library. If you mainly use popular services, Titan should be enough, but it's worth checking availability of lesser-known apps before buying (list at the bottom 😉).

Ambilight

Ambilight is still one of the best reasons to consider a Philips. On the OLED811 it's three-sided — LEDs at the top and along the sides of the chassis light the wall with colors matched to what's happening on screen. In the evening it creates a great effect and can change the mood of the whole room, which is why we awarded extra points for this feature. You don't have to use dynamic picture tracking though. If you prefer calmer viewing conditions, you can set a steady white light. That's a nice option for evening sessions when you don't want to sit in front of a bright screen in a completely dark room.

Classic features

For regular TV watching the OLED811 performs well, although there is no USB recording or picture-in-picture (PiP). You can connect Bluetooth headphones and use them at the same time as the TV speakers. What bothers us most is the aforementioned infrared control. The remote itself is really interestingly designed: it has backlighting and a hybrid keyboard with a numeric section. It's a shame you have to aim it at the TV like with old remotes. For equipment at this level we'd prefer to just press buttons without wondering which way we're holding the remote. Hopefully Philips will fix that in future models.

Apps

9.6/10

7.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

6.8/10

8.6/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
No
6 Mpix
Yes
No
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a real enigma. On one hand, it plays most popular audio and video formats without major issues. On the other hand, it can stumble over basic things like Polish letters. Files with characters like ą, ł, ć, or ś in their names often do not want to open or are displayed incorrectly. It looks strange because we supposedly have codec support, yet when it comes to simple matters related to the alphabet, the television just gets confused. Fortunately, this is not a huge problem, as thanks to Google TV, we can simply install another player, such as VLC. Then the issue with Polish letters disappears completely, and using multimedia becomes hassle-free.

The USB player in the OLED811 handles most of the audio and video formats we test, so it’s perfectly fine for watching a movie or playing music from a USB flash drive. Our biggest complaints are with photos, specifically the oddly selective handling of their resolutions. The TV opened files at 8, 16 and 32 MP, but couldn’t deal with the rest. It’s not that the photos are simply too large; the player can display a higher-resolution image yet refuse to open a smaller one. When browsing vacation photos this can be plain annoying, because some will have to be converted on a computer first... or you can just use remote screen capture... 😉

Sound

5/10

7.6/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    93dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

Last year, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 surprised us with really decent sound for a television in the super budget segment. Unfortunately, this year's edition – the A Pro 2026, has let us down across the board. The sound resembles the impression as if the device was playing underwater: flat, devoid of any bass or depth. The only plus remains the wide support for audio formats such as Dolby Atmos or DTS:X, but in practice, it doesn’t change much. If you're considering this television, you should immediately add a soundbar to the set, because without it, the audio experience will be quite disappointing.

When it comes to sound, there have been a few concrete changes compared with last year’s OLED820. The rear subwoofer has been removed, and the 4.1 speaker layout has been replaced by a 2.2 configuration. Despite those changes, the OLED811 still sounds good and quite balanced. It can play louder, and the sound even seems a bit fuller than last year. The bass has taken a hit, though. While the sound has some weight, the low end lacks the depth of the previous model. You notice this most in films and music, when you’re waiting for a bigger impact. Still, this is definitely well above average for built-in TV speakers. If you want deeper bass and clearer spatial effects, it’s worth considering a soundbar or a system with an AV receiver. Philips gives you a lot of flexibility here: it supports both Dolby Atmos and DTS, and can pass Dolby TrueHD tracks over HDMI eARC to compatible equipment without issue. So there’s plenty to take advantage of if we decide to expand the sound system later.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

93dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy