XIAOMI A PRO 2025 vs Philips OLED811

Direct comparison

OLED801 / OLED811

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 48”55”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.5

8.1

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.8

    8.5

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.1

    8.7

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.1

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    6.2

    8.9

  • TV as a computer monitor

    1.0

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    3.8

    6.0

  • Utility functions

    5.5

    7.9

  • Apps

    9.6

    7.7

  • Sound quality

    6.0

    7.6

Advantages

  • Expanded Google TV operating system

  • Voice control in Polish

  • Good image processing

  • High native contrast

  • Attractive price

  • Three-sided Ambilight that creates a great atmosphere while watching

  • Perfect blacks and outstanding contrast from the OLED panel

  • Strong HDR effect. Brightness around 1500 nits

  • Very good viewing angles

  • Excellent motion clarity (no motion blur)

  • Supports 4K at 165 Hz

  • Four HDMI 2.1 ports

  • Extensive features for gamers

  • Support for multiple audio/video formats (Dolby Vision, Dolby Atmos, HDR10+, DTS)

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness

  • Poor font readability

  • The system can lag

  • Titan OS has a more limited app library compared with Google TV and other competitors

  • An infrared remote that requires pointing at the TV (sometimes responds slowly)

  • Very high input lag in games with Dolby Vision

  • Visible posterization (mainly in bright scenes)

  • Underused image processing capabilities of the Pentonic 800

Our verdict

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 is a device that caters to the needs of many basic users. As one of the most affordable QLED TVs available, it offers a good balance between price and quality. One of its standout features is the Google TV system, which provides seamless access to a variety of apps and multimedia content. The intuitive interface makes it easy to navigate popular streaming platforms such as Netflix and YouTube. Voice control in Polish adds further convenience, allowing users to issue commands without manually navigating menus. The completely wireless remote enhances usability, removing the need to aim directly at the TV.

In terms of picture quality, the TV delivers solid performance for everyday viewing. It handles tonal transitions smoothly and processes lower-quality materials effectively, resulting in a pleasing image for standard television programmes. However, its limited brightness may affect performance in brightly lit environments—an expected compromise in this price range. The inclusion of a basic motion smoother allows for adjustable fluidity in movies and series, making it suitable for less demanding viewers in terms of motion handling.

That said, the TV’s 60 Hz panel and lack of advanced features may limit its appeal for those seeking higher performance. Its low input lag will appeal to occasional gamers, but the device falls short for PC connectivity due to poor font clarity, which makes text work less enjoyable. Additionally, while the operating system offers extensive functionality, its responsiveness could be better.

Despite these shortcomings, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 remains a compelling choice for budget-conscious users seeking an affordable QLED TV with practical features and reliable performance for basic applications.

The Philips OLED811 is a mid-range OLED TV for 2026 that stands out from its biggest rivals primarily because of one feature: Ambilight. By projecting light that follows the on-screen action onto the wall behind the TV, Ambilight can transform the atmosphere of an entire viewing session. In the evening, the picture seems to extend beyond the edges of the screen, making everything you watch feel that little bit more special. For some, it will simply be a nice extra; for others, it will be reason enough to choose a Philips TV once again.

Picture quality is very similar to what you get from models such as the LG C6 or Samsung S90H, at least in versions using the same type of panel. You can therefore expect deep, perfect blacks that make bright highlights look particularly impressive. The OLED811 is capable of delivering impactful HDR, and importantly, once calibrated, its picture comes close to reference quality. It does not have a major advantage over its competitors in this respect, but choosing Philips for Ambilight does not mean sacrificing picture quality either.

Gamers will also find several worthwhile improvements over last year’s model. Thanks to the MediaTek Pentonic 800 chipset, the TV finally offers four HDMI 2.1 ports. This means that connecting several devices—such as consoles, a PC and a soundbar—no longer forces you to decide which one gets access to the full capabilities of the interface. Gaming itself is highly enjoyable: the TV responds quickly, supports variable refresh rates and allows PC users to play in 4K at up to 165 Hz. It is only a shame that the new processor’s capabilities have not been put to equally good use when handling lower-quality content.

The operating system, however, raises the most concerns. Titan OS has replaced the well-liked Google TV platform, and although it has clearly improved over the past year, it is still difficult to see the change as a positive one. Admittedly, the system now runs more smoothly, offers more useful features and includes most popular streaming services in its app library. Nevertheless, the selection of apps remains far more limited than on Google TV and competing platforms. In our view, this is still the OLED811’s biggest weakness. The difference will be particularly noticeable to viewers who use less mainstream services.

Is it worth buying? Yes—provided that Titan OS meets your needs. In terms of picture quality and gaming features, the OLED811 offers just as much as its competitors, while Ambilight gives it something no rival can match. Philips therefore gives with one hand and takes with the other: it adds a uniquely immersive viewing atmosphere but limits your freedom when it comes to choosing apps. If all the services you use are available, this may well be a compromise worth making.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Budget
Good
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Black
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Swivel
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.9/10

10/10

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,300:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,200:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,100:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The Xiaomi A Pro features a VA panel, which provides significantly better black depth and colour intensity compared to IPS panels, particularly in low-light environments. Testing revealed a maximum contrast ratio of approximately 6000:1, which is a solid performance for its category. This high contrast allows for good separation of image elements in darker scenes, enhancing visual quality. For instance, in the film Oblivion, the TV excelled at distinguishing bright and dark areas, effectively elevating the viewing experience.

However, the lack of local dimming technology—a common limitation in this price range—becomes apparent in more demanding scenes. In films like The Revenant, where intricate shadow details are critical, the black levels lose their intensity, appearing closer to navy blue. Without dynamic dimming, parts of the image that should be deeply darkened remain faintly illuminated, which can diminish the overall impact of darker sequences.

Despite this limitation, the TV’s strong contrast performance makes it a good choice for viewers prioritising deep blacks and vibrant colours, provided their expectations align with the TV’s price bracket.

Black level and contrast are areas where the Philips OLED811 showcases all the strengths of OLED technology. Each pixel lights independently and can be turned completely off, so black is simply black. No gray halo or blooming around bright objects. In evening viewing this delivers a great effect: stars in the night sky, city lights, and text on dark backgrounds remain clearly separated from perfectly black surroundings.

So you shouldn't expect improvements here compared with other OLEDs, because in terms of black depth and contrast the result is already exemplary. The OLED811 doesn't need local dimming or any compromise between the brightness of a small object and the black around it. Even a single bright point can sit next to a completely switched-off pixel, giving the picture outstanding depth.

This is exactly where the advantage over Mini LED TVs becomes apparent in scenes with lots of black. Even the most advanced local dimming systems control larger areas of the image, so in demanding shots they can produce a halo around bright elements or dim them to preserve a dark background. The Philips OLED811 doesn't have that problem.

HDR effect quality

3.5/10

7.6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 92.0%, Bt.2020: 70.0%
DCI P3: 99.0%, Bt.2020: 74.5%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

205 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

220 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

243 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

213 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

237 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1225 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1310 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1443 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1368 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

626 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips OLED811

XIAOMI A PRO 2025

Luminance of RGB colors

In the HDR category, the Xiaomi A Pro performs poorly overall. Under ideal conditions, it achieves a brightness level of around 250 nits, which is underwhelming. However, many competing models offer similar or even lower brightness levels. Such limited brightness is insufficient to fully showcase the potential of HDR content. In practical terms, the image lacks the depth and intensity expected from high-quality HDR. Instead, the visuals resemble standard dynamic range (SDR), with scenes that should display striking brightness and contrast appearing flat and uninspiring. That said, for its price, the television offers solid DCI-P3 colour gamut coverage at 92%, made possible by its quantum dot (QLED) technology. This ensures vibrant and saturated colours, making it an appealing choice for gamers and movie enthusiasts seeking richer hues and improved colour reproduction compared to standard models.

Philips OLED811 uses the new generation WOLED EX panels, also found in models like the LG C6 and Samsung S90H. After calibration we measured around 1500 nits, which is a very good result for an OLED TV. You can see it clearly in movies and series. All kinds of light flashes have the right intensity, especially when they appear on a dark background. In such scenes the OLED811 can deliver truly impressive HDR. Of course, that doesn't mean you'll see that peak brightness in every shot. When the screen is filled with a large area of white or a big explosion, brightness falls to around 600 nits. That's still a good result, but those scenes no longer have the same punch as small, bright elements on a dark background. This is a known limitation of OLEDs, and the OLED811 is no exception.

Colors

Aside from HDR brightness, colors also matter, and Philips performs very well here too. It covers almost the entire DCI-P3 gamut, which contains most of the colors used in HDR movies and series. So you get rich reds and lush greens, and while watching it's hard to find major faults in this area. It looks a bit worse with the much wider BT.2020 gamut — its most saturated shades are already beyond the reach of this panel. Added to that is the issue of the white subpixel the WOLED panel uses to help boost brightness. With very bright colors you can see some "whitening": the color is bright but loses some of its saturation. In exactly these situations QD-OLED panels from Samsung Display have the advantage. In most movies and series, however, this won't be something that immediately stands out.

Factory color reproduction

5.1/10

7.8/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 performs best in movie mode for colour reproduction straight out of the box, though it is not without its flaws. An analysis of the white balance shows negative green values, causing distortions in white tones. At full white, there are noticeable deviations, and the high-contrast image leads to poor tonal transitions in red, negatively impacting the overall colour quality. Before calibration, the image often displays a pink hue in its scenery.

The gamma contrast graph falls below the 2.4 mark, indicating an overemphasis on darker tones and a lack of prominence in lighter areas. Additionally, the EOTF curve shows a sharp rise early on, which can result in lost detail in bright scenes and an oversaturated appearance. These issues suggest that further calibration is needed to balance the colour reproduction and enhance the overall image.

Factory colour settings on the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 are average, and while this is common in televisions of its class, users seeking accurate colour representation may need to adjust the settings. After proper calibration, the TV delivers a more natural and vibrant palette, aligning better with cinematic standards. For those prioritising precise colour reproduction, professional calibration will significantly improve image quality.

The movie mode on the Philips OLED811 is sensibly configured right out of the box. Most color errors are minor, both in SDR and HDR, so you can sit down and watch without first adjusting the settings. There are no major inaccuracies that would immediately pull attention away from the film.

It's not perfect, though. The white balance shows a slight deficiency of red compared with green, so whites and grays can have a faint greenish tint. It's not a strong cast, but measurements clearly show it. There are also small brightness deviations in SDR: some areas of the picture are slightly lifted, and the deepest blacks aren't always rendered evenly. In HDR the TV tracks the reference much more closely, although in places it slightly pulls details out of the shadows. These are generally things to refine. The factory movie mode provides a good starting point, and calibration will show how much more you can get out of it.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

9.3/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 TV shows significant improvement. The white balance is the most noticeable change, with previous errors corrected in HD and 4K content. Most deviations are now minimal, falling within an acceptable range, resulting in a more balanced and natural colour representation that enhances viewing comfort.

In terms of gamma, the drop has been largely addressed, leading to a more consistent rendering of tones across various scenes. However, the EOTF curve still hasn't seen substantial improvement, as there is limited control over dynamic tone mapping. This limitation means that some details may still be lost in bright scenes, affecting the perception of certain materials.

Despite these minor issues, the overall picture quality is improved after calibration. The enhanced white balance and reduced gamma issues provide a more realistic and enjoyable viewing experience. While further adjustments could enhance the image even more, the TV now showcases its potential, meeting the expectations of many users.

After calibration the Philips OLED811 produces an image very close to the reference. We managed to even out the white balance and remove the subtle color cast visible in the factory settings. Errors in Color Checker measurements for SDR and HDR dropped to around 1 to 2, and many samples even fall below 1. That's a level at which it's hard to spot differences from the reference image with the naked eye. We also improved the gamma, and only in the brightest whites a slight brightening remains. In HDR the EOTF curve also stays close to the reference, although the TV still tends to slightly boost the brightness of small elements like stars or subtitles. That gives the image a bit of extra glow that shouldn't be there, but otherwise there's little to complain about. It was already good out of the box, and after calibration we managed to refine most of the remaining shortcomings.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.3/10

7.5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

During testing of tonal transition fluidity, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 performed admirably. In most test sequences, there were no noticeable issues. Only in the scene with red water were there minor imperfections, but these were cosmetic and did not significantly impact the overall image quality. Both colour and grey gradients were reproduced with almost perfect accuracy, making this TV an excellent choice for those who prioritise this aspect of television performance.

Compared with Philips’ previous OLEDs, the smoothness of tonal transitions has clearly improved. The biggest difference is visible in the dark parts of the image, which can give WOLED panels a lot of trouble. On the OLED811 they have been smoothed out very well; tones transition smoothly from one to another without obvious banding or visible steps. That’s a big plus, especially when watching dark scenes. Unfortunately, it’s not as good in brighter scenes. This is where we have the biggest reservations: instead of smooth transitions between tones you can sometimes see distinct boundaries, a posterization effect. It can be noticeable, and it’s a shame that the improvement seen in dark scenes didn’t extend to the bright areas to the same degree.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.9/10

6.8/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 handles tonal transitions effectively, especially when dealing with lower-quality materials. Thanks to its advanced digital processing, the colour contour removal feature performs surprisingly well. Setting this option to "Medium" provides the best balance, enhancing the smoothness of tonal transitions while avoiding excessive smoothing of other image elements, like film grain.

In the case of a tested frame featuring a model with numerous branches in the background, the TV demonstrated its digital processing strengths. Adding artificial sharpness clarified the model’s details, particularly enhancing the hair's definition. However, around the branches, subtle contours emerged due to digital intervention. While this adds detail to the overall image, excessive sharpness can sometimes cause certain elements to appear unnaturally highlighted.

The OLED811 handles lower-quality content reasonably well, though it's far from perfect. The "Artifact Reduction" feature helps smooth tonal transitions and on the low setting delivers a pretty good result. It doesn't remove banding between shades as effectively as similar solutions from some competitors, but at least it doesn't introduce new artifacts. That's a sensible setting for everyday viewing. Still, there's some disappointment, because the MediaTek Pentonic 800 chip used here can, in other manufacturers' implementations, deal more effectively with heavy compression even at similarly low settings. A lot therefore depends on how each manufacturer uses its capabilities. We have a few more reservations about the 4K upscaling itself. There is plenty of detail, but the overall image looks fairly soft. Edges are heavily smoothed, which robs the picture of some sharpness and clarity. You can partly correct that with the sharpness slider in the menu, though that will just emphasize outlines rather than recover detail. On the plus side, there is no overscan, so even with an SD signal the TV does not crop the edges of the picture.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.3/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
165Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
0%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur ():

Blur (4K@165Hz ):

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 features a motion smoothing option known as "Motion Smoothing," which is designed mainly for film viewing. It allows users to adjust the effect to either a more cinematic, film-like appearance with visible frames or a smoother, theatrical image. This feature will likely satisfy movie lovers. However, gamers and sports enthusiasts might be disappointed. The TV uses a 60 Hz refresh rate panel, typical for this price range, which doesn’t offer exceptional motion handling. Our "Ufo" test revealed some motion blur, so those seeking sharper moving images may find it lacking in this regard.

In terms of motion handling, the OLED811 performs excellently. At 120 Hz, which is useful for console gaming and watching sports, the image stays clear and moving objects don’t leave noticeable trails. The fast response of OLED pixels helps here; you can see it clearly in the UFO test, even on dark backgrounds. There are also motion-smoothing controls. For movies you can adjust the strength of smoothing to your taste, ranging from preserving a cinematic feel to much smoother motion. A separate motion blur reduction control is useful for fast-paced content like live sports broadcasts.

Console compatibility and gaming features

3.3/10

9.5/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    No
    Yes
  • VRR range
    No
    48 - 165Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Warning Yes, high input lag
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 includes several gamer-friendly features, such as the Game Bar, which sets itself apart from the typical dashboards seen in other brands. This feature allows quick access to game-related settings, making it convenient during intense gaming sessions. The TV also supports Automatic Low Latency Mode (ALLM), automatically switching to a game-optimised mode to reduce signal delays. However, it lacks HDMI 2.1 support, limiting compatibility with the latest gaming consoles that require higher bandwidth. Additionally, it does not support features like VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) or G-Sync, which are becoming essential for gamers seeking smoother visuals and reduced tearing. While the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 has some useful features, there are better options in this price range offering more advanced gaming solutions.

OLED811 has almost everything you could expect from a gaming TV. It supports 120 Hz at Full HD, 1440p and 4K resolutions, and when connected to a PC can reach 165 Hz. It also has VRR, which helps avoid screen tearing with variable frame rates, and ALLM, which automatically switches to game mode. So you don't have to dig into the settings every time you power up your console.

HGiG also works correctly, so once you enable HDR on the console the TV doesn't apply its own brightness adjustments. There's also a Game Bar that lets you check signal parameters and quickly change settings useful while gaming. The list even includes Dolby Vision for games, but there's a significant catch, which you'll read about below.

Input lag

9.8/10

8.8/10

SDR

1080p60
15 ms
14 ms
1080p120
5 ms
2160p60
15 ms
14 ms
2160p120
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
14 ms
14 ms
2160p120
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
157 ms
2160p120 DV
57 ms

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 achieves excellent results, regardless of the resolution or HDR mode. With measurements as low as 15 ms, this television ranks among the best in terms of responsiveness.

OLED811 responds instantly. We measured 14 ms at 60 Hz and just 5 ms at 120 Hz, both in Full HD and 4K. Those are excellent results that let you comfortably play even fast-paced online titles. Unfortunately, enabling Dolby Vision changes things dramatically: at 60 Hz latency rises to 157 ms, and at 120 Hz it’s 57 ms. The first value in particular already means a clearly noticeable delay between input on the controller and the on-screen response. For gaming it’s definitely better to stick with HDR10.

Compatibility with PC

1/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Average
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
105ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGWB
Max refresh rate
60Hz
165Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

In the category of cooperation with a PC, Xiaomi A Pro 2025 performs very poorly. The fonts are of low quality, and their display on the screen is often problematic. Dithering is ubiquitous; when zooming in on the fonts against a dark background, they are displayed in three colours, which is definitely glaring and can significantly hinder the comfortable use of the device. Such problems can be a significant disadvantage for users who plan to use the television as a computer monitor.

Philips OLED811 works very well with a computer. The manufacturer finally managed to correctly implement 4:4:4 chroma even at maximum resolution and refresh rate. That means small text and colored outlines are legible, without blurring or the rainbow fringing that results from loss of color information. Dark text on dark backgrounds also performs well, which TVs can struggle with. There are still minor imperfections related to the RGWB subpixel layout. Fonts aren't as sharp as on a classic RGB monitor, and with white letters you can see subtle red outlines up close. From a normal viewing distance you hardly notice it, though sitting close to the screen at a desk makes it easier to spot.

The most fun, though, is PC gaming. The combination of 4K at 165 Hz, working G-Sync, and input lag around 5 ms makes the OLED811 excellent for that. If you have a computer that can take advantage of that refresh rate, it's definitely worth hooking it up to the Philips TV.

Viewing angles

2.6/10

7.8/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
81%
32%

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 performs poorly in terms of viewing angles due to its VA panel. While the TV offers better blacks when viewed directly in front, the image quality degrades significantly from side angles. During testing, our specialists observed that sitting just one metre from the device caused the image on the right side to appear brightened and desaturated. However, shifting slightly to the side improved the picture, highlighting the noticeable difference in image quality depending on the viewing angle. This makes the viewing experience less enjoyable for larger groups.

Viewing angles on the OLED811 are excellent and among the best on the market. Even sitting well off to the side, you still see the picture with deep blacks and well-saturated colors. That's a big advantage over LCD screens: you don't have to sit exactly in front to enjoy good picture quality.

QD-OLED panels perform even better, preserving colors more accurately at an angle. On the Philips, at wider viewing angles whites shift slightly toward a greenish tint, but the effect is so minor that it's hard to find it bothersome while watching. We'd even say that in this respect we encountered the best WOLED unit we've tested so far.

Daytime performance

3.8/10

6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Glare
Reflection suppression
Average
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

Philips OLED811: 392 cd/m2

XIAOMI A PRO 2025: 249 cd/m2

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 presents itself as average. The screen coating is satin, which may help reduce reflections, but the suppression of reflections is average. The brightness of the television is only 250 nits, which is a relatively low result compared to other models on the market. As a result, during sunny days or in brightly lit rooms, the image quality may suffer, and details may be hard to discern.

OLED811 handles daytime viewing fairly well, though in a very bright living room it already has its limits. Maximum SDR brightness reaches about 600 nits, comparable to the LG C6 or the Samsung S90H, which use the same panel. That's noticeably higher than basic OLEDs and will be more than enough for most people. Keep in mind, however, that this brightness isn't maintained across the whole screen; with a lot of white it drops, and the average of our measurements was about 392 nits.

Direct reflections from windows or lamps can be a bigger problem. The glossy coating reduces them reasonably well, but you can still see them clearly on the screen, especially in dark scenes. It doesn't diffuse them as effectively as matte screens, so placing the TV opposite a large window isn't the best idea. On the plus side, black levels remain very good during the day. In a typical living room the Philips will perform without major issues, but if strong sunlight falls directly on the screen, you'll want blinds.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
WRGB OLED
Software version during testing
RTM5.220609.003.1850
TPM267E_V167.002.054.151
Image processor
M7632 2GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 TV Panel details
Review Philips OLED811 TV Panel details

XIAOMI A PRO 2025

Philips OLED811

TV features

5.5/10

7.9/10

  • System
    Google TV
    Titan OS
  • System performance
    Poor
    Good
  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    No
    Yes
  • Audio description
    No
    Yes

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 stands out with its Google TV system, one of its key advantages. This platform provides access to a wide range of applications and streaming services, making the TV easy to use. It also features a voice assistant for streamlined navigation and quick content searches without the need to scroll through menus. A major benefit of Google TV is the ability to download virtually any app from the Google Play Store, allowing users to customise the TV to suit their preferences. Users can install streaming, gaming, and other apps, turning the TV into a multimedia entertainment centre. However, it’s important to note that this model lacks recording features and AirPlay, which may disappoint some users. Additionally, there are noticeable lag issues with the operating system, which can affect ease of use. On the plus side, the TV supports Bluetooth pairing with other devices and the remote control can operate without the need to aim at the screen, enhancing user comfort. Despite a few shortcomings, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 is a solid option for those seeking a modern TV experience.

Smart features: Titan OS

It's the Smart TV system that is the most controversial change in the OLED811. Philips dropped the user-favorite Google TV in favor of its own Titan OS. For many people this may be hard to accept, although Titan has been getting better every year and runs noticeably smoother. We have working AirPlay, screen mirroring from a computer, and voice search in Polish. System responsiveness has improved too, though minor delays still occur when navigating menus. We suspect the infrared remote is partly to blame, as it doesn't always register commands immediately. The biggest limitation compared with Google TV remains a smaller app selection. That doesn't mean it's empty — you'll find Netflix, Prime Video, Disney+, CANAL+, and Apple TV was recently added to the library. If you mainly use popular services, Titan should be enough, but it's worth checking availability of lesser-known apps before buying (list at the bottom 😉).

Ambilight

Ambilight is still one of the best reasons to consider a Philips. On the OLED811 it's three-sided — LEDs at the top and along the sides of the chassis light the wall with colors matched to what's happening on screen. In the evening it creates a great effect and can change the mood of the whole room, which is why we awarded extra points for this feature. You don't have to use dynamic picture tracking though. If you prefer calmer viewing conditions, you can set a steady white light. That's a nice option for evening sessions when you don't want to sit in front of a bright screen in a completely dark room.

Classic features

For regular TV watching the OLED811 performs well, although there is no USB recording or picture-in-picture (PiP). You can connect Bluetooth headphones and use them at the same time as the TV speakers. What bothers us most is the aforementioned infrared control. The remote itself is really interestingly designed: it has backlighting and a hybrid keyboard with a numeric section. It's a shame you have to aim it at the TV like with old remotes. For equipment at this level we'd prefer to just press buttons without wondering which way we're holding the remote. Hopefully Philips will fix that in future models.

Apps

9.6/10

7.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

6.8/10

8.6/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
No
6 Mpix
Yes
No
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 comes with a decent built-in media player that satisfies basic user expectations. However, it does have limitations, occasionally struggling with certain file formats, which could be a point of frustration. Thankfully, with access to the Google Play Store, users can easily download alternative media players to better suit their needs. In testing, we found that the TV's compatibility with apps is generally strong, and third-party media players work seamlessly. The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 runs on the Android TV platform, providing access to apps and streaming services. By installing alternative media players, users can overcome compatibility issues and enhance the TV’s functionality. This makes the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 a more versatile option, capable of meeting diverse media playback needs of users, including those with more demanding requirements.

The USB player in the OLED811 handles most of the audio and video formats we test, so it’s perfectly fine for watching a movie or playing music from a USB flash drive. Our biggest complaints are with photos, specifically the oddly selective handling of their resolutions. The TV opened files at 8, 16 and 32 MP, but couldn’t deal with the rest. It’s not that the photos are simply too large; the player can display a higher-resolution image yet refuse to open a smaller one. When browsing vacation photos this can be plain annoying, because some will have to be converted on a computer first... or you can just use remote screen capture... 😉

Sound

6/10

7.6/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    93dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 offers surprisingly good sound quality for its price range. The audio performance is solid, meeting expectations for a TV in this class. Notably, it supports DTS audio formats, a feature often absent in even more expensive models. While this assessment is subjective and may differ based on personal preferences, the TV delivers a commendable audio experience for its price point.

When it comes to sound, there have been a few concrete changes compared with last year’s OLED820. The rear subwoofer has been removed, and the 4.1 speaker layout has been replaced by a 2.2 configuration. Despite those changes, the OLED811 still sounds good and quite balanced. It can play louder, and the sound even seems a bit fuller than last year. The bass has taken a hit, though. While the sound has some weight, the low end lacks the depth of the previous model. You notice this most in films and music, when you’re waiting for a bigger impact. Still, this is definitely well above average for built-in TV speakers. If you want deeper bass and clearer spatial effects, it’s worth considering a soundbar or a system with an AV receiver. Philips gives you a lot of flexibility here: it supports both Dolby Atmos and DTS, and can pass Dolby TrueHD tracks over HDMI eARC to compatible equipment without issue. So there’s plenty to take advantage of if we decide to expand the sound system later.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

93dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy