XIAOMI A PRO 2025 vs Haier K85F

Direct comparison

K85F / K85FUX

Available screen sizes: 43”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.5

5.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.8

    5.2

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.1

    5.2

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.1

    4.6

  • Gaming on console

    6.2

    6.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    1.0

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    3.8

    4.1

  • Utility functions

    5.5

    5.5

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    6.0

    4.8

Advantages

  • Expanded Google TV operating system

  • Voice control in Polish

  • Good image processing

  • High native contrast

  • Attractive price

  • Low input lag, great for gaming

  • Surprisingly good file player via USB

  • High contrast and decent blacks (VA panel)

  • Good text readability in PC monitor mode

  • Presence of gaming features: ALLM and VRR

  • Access to many applications thanks to GoogleTV

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness

  • Poor font readability

  • The system can lag

  • Catastrophic picture quality in HDR mode

  • Poor quality of workmanship and fit of materials

  • Slow, glitchy, and poorly translated Google TV system

  • Very poor sound quality from built-in speakers

  • Problematic remote (and no batteries included)

  • Poor viewing angles

  • Low brightness and weak anti-reflective coating

  • Low color gamut coverage

Our verdict

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 is a device that caters to the needs of many basic users. As one of the most affordable QLED TVs available, it offers a good balance between price and quality. One of its standout features is the Google TV system, which provides seamless access to a variety of apps and multimedia content. The intuitive interface makes it easy to navigate popular streaming platforms such as Netflix and YouTube. Voice control in Polish adds further convenience, allowing users to issue commands without manually navigating menus. The completely wireless remote enhances usability, removing the need to aim directly at the TV.

In terms of picture quality, the TV delivers solid performance for everyday viewing. It handles tonal transitions smoothly and processes lower-quality materials effectively, resulting in a pleasing image for standard television programmes. However, its limited brightness may affect performance in brightly lit environments—an expected compromise in this price range. The inclusion of a basic motion smoother allows for adjustable fluidity in movies and series, making it suitable for less demanding viewers in terms of motion handling.

That said, the TV’s 60 Hz panel and lack of advanced features may limit its appeal for those seeking higher performance. Its low input lag will appeal to occasional gamers, but the device falls short for PC connectivity due to poor font clarity, which makes text work less enjoyable. Additionally, while the operating system offers extensive functionality, its responsiveness could be better.

Despite these shortcomings, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 remains a compelling choice for budget-conscious users seeking an affordable QLED TV with practical features and reliable performance for basic applications.

The debut of the Haier brand in the European TV market with the K85F model gives the impression of being rushed, and after thorough testing, it feels almost unfinished. Analyzing this product, we come to a fundamental conclusion: its biggest problem is not the quality of the panel used. Given its price segment, this is simply average, with the typical advantages of VA technology in the form of high contrast and equally typical disadvantages such as poor viewing angles. What actually disqualifies this model as a home entertainment center is the glaring lack of engineering and, above all, software refinement. The list of shortcomings is long and starts from the first contact with the device. Careless assembly, which could have been avoided at the quality control stage, a poorly optimized and poorly translated Google TV system, and annoying issues with such basic functions as pairing the remote—these all contribute to the picture of a product that seems to have been released to market without due diligence. The catastrophic picture quality in HDR mode, resulting not only from low brightness but also from a complete lack of intelligent adaptation to the signal, only adds to this disappointing image. However, it turns out that this model has its second, surprising face. It is enough to look at it not through the prism of a home TV, but rather as a large and cheap display for special tasks. Then its shortcomings take a backseat, and unexpected advantages come to the forefront: an exceptionally well-functioning media player with USB, outstanding font readability from a PC, and access to a huge database of applications. In such a role—as a screen in a conference room, hotel lobby, or simple advertising player—the Haier K85F performs surprisingly well. For the typical user seeking a reliable and simply well-functioning TV for the living room in 2025, however, the Haier K85F is a proposition that is extremely difficult to recommend with a clear conscience. It is a product full of contradictions that fails in its primary function intended by the manufacturer on too many fronts.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Budget
BuildQuality-Budget
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Black
Black
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.9/10

5.6/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,300:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,200:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,100:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Review Haier K85F Contrast and black detail

Result

3,550:1

Review Haier K85F Contrast and black detail

Result

5,200:1

Review Haier K85F Contrast and black detail

Result

5,350:1

Review Haier K85F Contrast and black detail

Result

5,400:1

Review Haier K85F Contrast and black detail

Result

3,500:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail
Review Haier K85F Contrast and black detail
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail
Review Haier K85F Contrast and black detail

The Xiaomi A Pro features a VA panel, which provides significantly better black depth and colour intensity compared to IPS panels, particularly in low-light environments. Testing revealed a maximum contrast ratio of approximately 6000:1, which is a solid performance for its category. This high contrast allows for good separation of image elements in darker scenes, enhancing visual quality. For instance, in the film Oblivion, the TV excelled at distinguishing bright and dark areas, effectively elevating the viewing experience.

However, the lack of local dimming technology—a common limitation in this price range—becomes apparent in more demanding scenes. In films like The Revenant, where intricate shadow details are critical, the black levels lose their intensity, appearing closer to navy blue. Without dynamic dimming, parts of the image that should be deeply darkened remain faintly illuminated, which can diminish the overall impact of darker sequences.

Despite this limitation, the TV’s strong contrast performance makes it a good choice for viewers prioritising deep blacks and vibrant colours, provided their expectations align with the TV’s price bracket.

Well, let's get to the meat of the matter, which is how the Haier K85F handles black levels and contrast. The key information is that the television uses a VA panel, which is crucial for picture quality in dark scenes. Thanks to this, the contrast is really solid – our measurements showed values around 5000:1, which is much better than those of popular IPS panels.

However, it's important to remember that we are talking about budget equipment. So, we should not expect any advanced technologies, such as local dimming. The backlighting works across the entire screen at all times. How did it look during viewing? We took the movie “Oblivion” with its cosmic landscapes for a test, and we also checked classic black bars in other productions. The effect was quite decent. The blacks had a good depth, but they weren't perfectly inky – a slight, bluish glow could be seen, revealing that the backlighting of the panel was still active.

HDR effect quality

3.5/10

3.4/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 92.0%, Bt.2020: 70.0%
DCI P3: 81.8%, Bt.2020: 61.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

205 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

220 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

243 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

213 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

237 nit

Review Haier K85F Brightness measurement

Result

217 nit

Review Haier K85F Brightness measurement

Result

212 nit

Review Haier K85F Brightness measurement

Result

278 nit

Review Haier K85F Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Review Haier K85F Brightness measurement

Result

273 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 HDR effect quality
Review Haier K85F HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 HDR effect quality
Review Haier K85F HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 HDR effect quality
Review Haier K85F HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

Haier K85F

HDR luminance

XIAOMI A PRO 2025

HDR luminance

In the HDR category, the Xiaomi A Pro performs poorly overall. Under ideal conditions, it achieves a brightness level of around 250 nits, which is underwhelming. However, many competing models offer similar or even lower brightness levels. Such limited brightness is insufficient to fully showcase the potential of HDR content. In practical terms, the image lacks the depth and intensity expected from high-quality HDR. Instead, the visuals resemble standard dynamic range (SDR), with scenes that should display striking brightness and contrast appearing flat and uninspiring. That said, for its price, the television offers solid DCI-P3 colour gamut coverage at 92%, made possible by its quantum dot (QLED) technology. This ensures vibrant and saturated colours, making it an appealing choice for gamers and movie enthusiasts seeking richer hues and improved colour reproduction compared to standard models.

Now let's move on to one of the hottest topics in the world of televisions, which is the quality of HDR effect. In the case of the Haier K85F model, we must unfortunately make it clear: if you are looking for equipment to watch content in a wide dynamic range, you should steer clear of this model. The main issue is its very low peak brightness, which during our tests barely reached 250 nits. To give you a better idea of what this means – such a value is okay for watching standard SDR materials, but it is absolutely insufficient to show any real benefits of HDR. The image simply lacks the "power" to generate bright, striking bursts. All our measurements and tests on specialist patterns only confirmed this. As if that weren't enough, the television also struggles with color reproduction. In this budget model, we won't find any technologies that expand the color palette, such as quantum dot layers (known in marketing as "QLED"). As a result, the coverage of the DCI-P3 color space, which is crucial for HDR materials, is only about 80%. In practice, this means that the image will not only be dark but also devoid of vibrant, saturated colors that the director wanted to show us.

Factory color reproduction

5.1/10

3.8/10

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Factory color reproduction
Review Haier K85F Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Factory color reproduction
Review Haier K85F Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 performs best in movie mode for colour reproduction straight out of the box, though it is not without its flaws. An analysis of the white balance shows negative green values, causing distortions in white tones. At full white, there are noticeable deviations, and the high-contrast image leads to poor tonal transitions in red, negatively impacting the overall colour quality. Before calibration, the image often displays a pink hue in its scenery.

The gamma contrast graph falls below the 2.4 mark, indicating an overemphasis on darker tones and a lack of prominence in lighter areas. Additionally, the EOTF curve shows a sharp rise early on, which can result in lost detail in bright scenes and an oversaturated appearance. These issues suggest that further calibration is needed to balance the colour reproduction and enhance the overall image.

Factory colour settings on the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 are average, and while this is common in televisions of its class, users seeking accurate colour representation may need to adjust the settings. After proper calibration, the TV delivers a more natural and vibrant palette, aligning better with cinematic standards. For those prioritising precise colour reproduction, professional calibration will significantly improve image quality.

Well, how does the television perform with colors straight from the factory, without any intervention from our side? The Haier K85F offers a full range of picture modes, such as Dynamic or Eco, but for anyone who wants to watch movies according to the creators' intentions, only one really matters: Film mode. This is the mode we focused our tests on, and unfortunately, its name has little to do with reality. The picture in the factory settings is far from what we could call cinematic fidelity and requires many adjustments. Let's start with the white balance, which has a clear lack of red color. In practice, this means that the whole picture has a cool, bluish tint. The situation is even worse when it comes to brightness management, specifically gamma curves (for SDR) and EOTF (for HDR). Their graph resembles a real rollercoaster, which has a disastrous effect on the viewing experience. This results in unnatural dimming of SDR content, causing details in the shadows to get lost, and in the case of HDR – excessive brightness, which further exacerbates the issue of highlights. This combination, meaning too cool white combined with chaotic brightness and excessive blue color saturation, causes enormous errors in color reproduction. Our measurements on a specialized ColorChecker chart showed errors (Delta E) regularly reaching and exceeding values of 8-9. In simpler terms: errors above the threshold of 3 are easily noticeable to the naked eye, so such a result means that the colors on the screen are simply heavily distorted.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

6.2/10

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Color reproduction after calibration
Review Haier K85F Color reproduction after calibration
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Color reproduction after calibration
Review Haier K85F Color reproduction after calibration

After calibration, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 TV shows significant improvement. The white balance is the most noticeable change, with previous errors corrected in HD and 4K content. Most deviations are now minimal, falling within an acceptable range, resulting in a more balanced and natural colour representation that enhances viewing comfort.

In terms of gamma, the drop has been largely addressed, leading to a more consistent rendering of tones across various scenes. However, the EOTF curve still hasn't seen substantial improvement, as there is limited control over dynamic tone mapping. This limitation means that some details may still be lost in bright scenes, affecting the perception of certain materials.

Despite these minor issues, the overall picture quality is improved after calibration. The enhanced white balance and reduced gamma issues provide a more realistic and enjoyable viewing experience. While further adjustments could enhance the image even more, the TV now showcases its potential, meeting the expectations of many users.

Well, is there anything we can do about this image? Can professional calibration save the situation? The answer is: both yes and no. It must be clearly stated that there are certain things we cannot overcome. The limitations of the construction itself, namely a poor panel and its narrow color coverage, mean that you can forget about achieving meaningful HDR – we won’t sugarcoat it for you. The biggest beneficiary of our adjustments is undoubtedly the SDR mode, and it is precisely for watching such content, after calibration, that this television begins to make sense. We managed to tame the white balance in our own way. Although the TV only offers basic 2-point adjustment (instead of precise 20-point), it’s not perfect, but we successfully eliminated that unpleasant, cold "chill" in the image. Above all, however, we recorded a significant improvement in brightness management. The gamma curve, which previously resembled a rollercoaster, looks like an almost perfectly straight line after calibration. This is a sign that the TV can finally display images without artificially dimming or brightening them. The conclusion is simple: even in the case of such a cheap television, professional adjustment of the settings can achieve a lot and draw out its maximum potential.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.3/10

7.6/10

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier K85F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier K85F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier K85F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier K85F Smoothness of tonal transitions

During testing of tonal transition fluidity, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 performed admirably. In most test sequences, there were no noticeable issues. Only in the scene with red water were there minor imperfections, but these were cosmetic and did not significantly impact the overall image quality. Both colour and grey gradients were reproduced with almost perfect accuracy, making this TV an excellent choice for those who prioritise this aspect of television performance.

It's time to address an issue that many may overlook, but to the trained (and not only) eye, it can be quite irritating. We're talking about the smoothness of tonal transitions, or how smoothly the screen displays transitions between very similar shades of one color – for example, on a clear blue sky. We must admit that in this category, the Haier K85F, considering its price, performs quite decently. In bright scenes, such as the aforementioned sky or expansive landscapes in the movie "The Martian," there are no harsh, contrasting bands visible. Indeed, if we look closely, we can spot minimal imperfections, but generally, the effect is more than satisfactory. However, the situation changes when darker scenes are on the screen, such as gloomy corridors in games or nighttime landscapes. Here, banding, or the posterization effect, becomes much more noticeable. Transitions in shadows and shades of gray are no longer as smooth and can irritate the more sensitive eye. This is not a level that would completely disqualify the television, but it is evident that this is an area where costs were cut.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.9/10

4/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier K85F Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier K85F Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 handles tonal transitions effectively, especially when dealing with lower-quality materials. Thanks to its advanced digital processing, the colour contour removal feature performs surprisingly well. Setting this option to "Medium" provides the best balance, enhancing the smoothness of tonal transitions while avoiding excessive smoothing of other image elements, like film grain.

In the case of a tested frame featuring a model with numerous branches in the background, the TV demonstrated its digital processing strengths. Adding artificial sharpness clarified the model’s details, particularly enhancing the hair's definition. However, around the branches, subtle contours emerged due to digital intervention. While this adds detail to the overall image, excessive sharpness can sometimes cause certain elements to appear unnaturally highlighted.

Let's move on to digital processing and image scaling, that is, how the Haier K85F handles lower resolution signals, for example, from standard television. Right from the start, we encounter an extremely annoying and completely incomprehensible issue – the overscan feature is enabled by default. This means that the television artificially enlarges the image, cropping its edges, and this occurs on every source, even 1080p. To see the full frame, you have to dig into the screen settings every time and manually switch the format to "stretch to 16:9." It's a detail, but incredibly frustrating. The scaling of content to 4K resolution can be described in one word: acceptable. And that's basically it. The image processor does not strip the image of details, nor does it generate jagged edges or other artifacts. It simply does its job, without any fireworks. It's fine, but nothing more. The biggest and most noticeable shortcoming in the digital processing section is the absence of a banding smoothing function. This is an algorithm that could significantly reduce the annoying banding effect we mentioned earlier. Unfortunately, the manufacturer did not implement such a solution, condemning us to watch the imperfections of the panel and low-quality materials in all their glory.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.3/10

4.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
No
-
BFI function 120Hz
No
-
Brightness drop with BFI
0%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 features a motion smoothing option known as "Motion Smoothing," which is designed mainly for film viewing. It allows users to adjust the effect to either a more cinematic, film-like appearance with visible frames or a smoother, theatrical image. This feature will likely satisfy movie lovers. However, gamers and sports enthusiasts might be disappointed. The TV uses a 60 Hz refresh rate panel, typical for this price range, which doesn’t offer exceptional motion handling. Our "Ufo" test revealed some motion blur, so those seeking sharper moving images may find it lacking in this regard.

The panel in the K85F model operates at a native refresh rate of 60 Hz, which already sets certain expectations for smoothness of the image right from the start. However, we must admit that we were very positively surprised when we found not one, but two separate sliders for motion control in the settings menu: one labeled "Blur Reduction" and the other "De-Judder." Such generosity in this price segment is an absolute rarity, as usually manufacturers offer at most one common option. Unfortunately, our enthusiasm quickly dwindled as fast as it appeared. It soon became clear why Haier was so "generous" – the slider responsible for blur reduction is simply a dummy. Moving it does not produce any visible effect on the screen; thus, only one of the two options actually works.

Console compatibility and gaming features

3.3/10

4/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    No
    Yes
  • VRR range
    No
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    No

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 includes several gamer-friendly features, such as the Game Bar, which sets itself apart from the typical dashboards seen in other brands. This feature allows quick access to game-related settings, making it convenient during intense gaming sessions. The TV also supports Automatic Low Latency Mode (ALLM), automatically switching to a game-optimised mode to reduce signal delays. However, it lacks HDMI 2.1 support, limiting compatibility with the latest gaming consoles that require higher bandwidth. Additionally, it does not support features like VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) or G-Sync, which are becoming essential for gamers seeking smoother visuals and reduced tearing. While the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 has some useful features, there are better options in this price range offering more advanced gaming solutions.

Let's move on to the features for gamers, although we must point out right away that this is more of a proposal for "casual" players. The manufacturer boasts in the specifications about the presence of HDMI 2.1 ports, which looks impressive on paper, but in reality, it is largely a marketing gimmick. What good is a modern port when the heart of the television is a panel with a refresh rate of 60 Hz? It physically cannot display a signal at 120 frames per second, even at lower resolutions, which takes away HDMI 2.1's most important advantage. That's a shame. (That’s why we mark it as HDMI 2.0 ports in our tests). Another oddity is the television's response to attempts to calibrate HDR from the console. Changes in brightness settings cause very unnatural behavior of the image, which might suggest an incorrect implementation of the HGiG standard. To be honest, however, you shouldn't worry too much about this, because as we have mentioned multiple times, we simply do not recommend using any HDR content on this screen. However, to make it not so bitter, the Haier K85F also has two significant and unexpected advantages. The first is the presence of ALLM, or Auto Low Latency Mode, which switches the television to low latency mode as soon as it detects a connected console. The second, even bigger surprise is support for VRR, or Variable Refresh Rate. Although it works in a very modest range of 48-60 Hz, its very presence is commendable. Thanks to this, the image in games can stutter less, which truly improves the gaming experience.

Input lag

9.8/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
15 ms
13 ms
1080p120
2160p60
15 ms
13 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
14 ms
13 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
13 ms
2160p120 DV

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 achieves excellent results, regardless of the resolution or HDR mode. With measurements as low as 15 ms, this television ranks among the best in terms of responsiveness.

However, we have to give credit to Haier – there is one parameter where this television absolutely shines and embarrasses many more expensive models. We are talking about input lag, or signal delay. Our measurements showed a remarkably low result of only 13 ms. This is a huge advantage that makes controlling games instantaneous and extremely responsive. In this regard, the K85F performs excellently.

Compatibility with PC

1/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Average
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
105ms
13ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Compatibility with PC
Review Haier K85F Compatibility with PC

In the category of cooperation with a PC, Xiaomi A Pro 2025 performs very poorly. The fonts are of low quality, and their display on the screen is often problematic. Dithering is ubiquitous; when zooming in on the fonts against a dark background, they are displayed in three colours, which is definitely glaring and can significantly hinder the comfortable use of the device. Such problems can be a significant disadvantage for users who plan to use the television as a computer monitor.

And what if we try to use this Haier as a computer monitor? Here, what was a big surprise for us, the TV performs exceptionally well. For office work – it’s perfect. All thanks to the fact that it properly supports the so-called chroma sampling 4:4:4. To put it simply: every single letter on the screen is sharp, without annoying colored halos or blurriness. Sure, let’s be straightforward – this is not equipment for PC gamers. 60 Hz is too low for them. But if you just need a big screen for text work, browsing the internet, coding, or displaying presentations, then the K85F will perform excellently in this role. It’s one of its strongest and, to be honest, most unexpected applications.

Viewing angles

2.6/10

2.8/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
81%
67%

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 performs poorly in terms of viewing angles due to its VA panel. While the TV offers better blacks when viewed directly in front, the image quality degrades significantly from side angles. During testing, our specialists observed that sitting just one metre from the device caused the image on the right side to appear brightened and desaturated. However, shifting slightly to the side improved the picture, highlighting the noticeable difference in image quality depending on the viewing angle. This makes the viewing experience less enjoyable for larger groups.

At almost the very end of the evaluation of the panel itself, we left the viewing angles, which unfortunately are one of its biggest weaknesses. However, we must honestly admit that this is no surprise – it is simply a natural and widely known characteristic of VA-type panels. In the unit we tested, interestingly, the brightness of the image did not drop drastically when we moved away from the center of the screen. The real problem, however, is the colors, which instantly begin to fade. A slight change in position on the sofa is enough for the hues to lose their saturation and become washed out. In this regard, the Haier K85F presents a very average level, typical for this technology.

Daytime performance

3.8/10

4.1/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Average
Average
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Daytime performance
Review Haier K85F Daytime performance
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Daytime performance
Review Haier K85F Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

Haier K85F: 276 cd/m2

XIAOMI A PRO 2025: 249 cd/m2

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 presents itself as average. The screen coating is satin, which may help reduce reflections, but the suppression of reflections is average. The brightness of the television is only 250 nits, which is a relatively low result compared to other models on the market. As a result, during sunny days or in brightly lit rooms, the image quality may suffer, and details may be hard to discern.

And how does the television perform in confrontation with daylight, for example in a heavily sunlit living room? Unfortunately, we don't have good news here. As we've established, this is a television with relatively low brightness, which becomes a serious drawback in the face of sunlight. The situation is further worsened by the applied screen coating. Instead of effectively suppressing reflections, its satin structure tends to unfavorably scatter them. In practice, this means that the reflection of a window or lamp turns into a large, blurred, milky halo, which degrades contrast and effectively hinders viewing. The conclusion is therefore clear: if the television is to be placed in a bright room, the K85F model will not be a good choice.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
White LED
Software version during testing
RTM5.220609.003.1850
UKN2.241219.053
Image processor
M7632 2GB RAM
mt5896

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 TV Panel details
Review Haier K85F TV Panel details

XIAOMI A PRO 2025

Haier K85F

TV features

5.5/10

5.5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    No
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 TV features
Review Haier K85F TV features
Review Haier K85F TV features
Review Haier K85F TV features
Review Haier K85F TV features
Review Haier K85F TV features
Review Haier K85F TV features

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 stands out with its Google TV system, one of its key advantages. This platform provides access to a wide range of applications and streaming services, making the TV easy to use. It also features a voice assistant for streamlined navigation and quick content searches without the need to scroll through menus. A major benefit of Google TV is the ability to download virtually any app from the Google Play Store, allowing users to customise the TV to suit their preferences. Users can install streaming, gaming, and other apps, turning the TV into a multimedia entertainment centre. However, it’s important to note that this model lacks recording features and AirPlay, which may disappoint some users. Additionally, there are noticeable lag issues with the operating system, which can affect ease of use. On the plus side, the TV supports Bluetooth pairing with other devices and the remote control can operate without the need to aim at the screen, enhancing user comfort. Despite a few shortcomings, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 is a solid option for those seeking a modern TV experience.

GoogleTV on Haier K85F

The heart of the television is the Google TV system, which in theory should be its huge advantage. Access to thousands of applications and a wealth of features are promises we are familiar with. Unfortunately, in Haier's execution, this is one of the worst implementations of this software we have encountered. The system operates painfully slowly, and the interface notoriously freezes. However, the real nightmare is the incorrect and often downright comical translations of some menu options, making it at times difficult to figure out what is being referred to. To make matters worse, during our tests, we were unable to launch the AirPlay function, which simply did not work.

Classic features on Haier K85F

Let's move on to the classic features and ports, because this story is even more interesting. A plus is certainly the rich set of ports, including four HDMI inputs and a rarely found mini-jack headphone output. Unfortunately, the television does not offer either USB recording or PiP mode. However, the real ordeal begins with the remote. Our first attempts to pair it via Bluetooth to activate radio frequency (RF) control and voice functions ended in total failure. After several dozen attempts, we were sure it was simply a manufacturing defect. And here's the surprise: after a long struggle, we discovered that the remote can be paired, but it needs to be done from the native Google TV settings, completely bypassing Haier's non-functioning system overlay. This is a perfect example of how terrible software can ruin basic functionality. Oh, and one more thing. In the box... there weren’t even any batteries for the remote.

Playing files from USB

6.8/10

9.4/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 comes with a decent built-in media player that satisfies basic user expectations. However, it does have limitations, occasionally struggling with certain file formats, which could be a point of frustration. Thankfully, with access to the Google Play Store, users can easily download alternative media players to better suit their needs. In testing, we found that the TV's compatibility with apps is generally strong, and third-party media players work seamlessly. The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 runs on the Android TV platform, providing access to apps and streaming services. By installing alternative media players, users can overcome compatibility issues and enhance the TV’s functionality. This makes the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 a more versatile option, capable of meeting diverse media playback needs of users, including those with more demanding requirements.

After all our complaints about the unfinished software, the moment came when we experienced absolute shock. It turns out that within this error-prone and slow system, there is a function that works almost perfectly and puts industry veterans to shame. We are talking about the built-in media player for USB drives. It is a true multimedia powerhouse that played virtually every video format we threw at it without the slightest hesitation – from the most popular to the completely niche. Haier, a newcomer to the TV market, has achieved something that many manufacturers with decades of experience have struggled with for years. Who knows, perhaps it was intended to be a reliable player for conference rooms? Regardless of its origin, the result is outstanding!

Apps

9.6/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Sound

6/10

4.8/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    83dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 offers surprisingly good sound quality for its price range. The audio performance is solid, meeting expectations for a TV in this class. Notably, it supports DTS audio formats, a feature often absent in even more expensive models. While this assessment is subjective and may differ based on personal preferences, the TV delivers a commendable audio experience for its price point.

Unfortunately, the review regarding the sound will be very short. The biggest advantage of the built-in speakers of the K85F is actually that they are simply there and produce sound. Aside from that, the sound is completely flat, lacking any bass tones and just anemic. Yes, the TV box features a Dolby Atmos logo, but in light of the physical capabilities of these drivers, it is a function that exists only on paper. Therefore, the verdict can only be one: when planning to purchase this TV, one should immediately add a soundbar to the budget.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

83dBC (Max)

75dBC