TCL C9K vs Philips OLED950

Direct comparison

C9K

OLED950 / OLED+

Available screen sizes: 65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 65”77”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.7

8.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.4

    8.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    7.0

    8.8

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.8

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    8.9

    9.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    6.5

  • Watching in bright light

    7.0

    7.3

  • Utility functions

    7.7

    6.5

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    7.9

    8.2

Advantages

  • Very good contrast and black

  • Very high brightness

  • Support for all HDR formats including Dolby Vision

  • Fast 144Hz panel - for gaming and sports fans

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, low input lag, etc.

  • GoogleTV operating system with a wide range of applications

  • Great sound branded by Bang & Olufsen

  • Improved viewing angles thanks to WHVA panel

  • Amazing peak brightness, exceeding 2000 nits on test panels (Tandem OLED matrix)

  • Perfect blacks and infinite contrast

  • Support for all HDR formats, including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Excellent support for gamers: 4K@120Hz, VRR, ALLM, and 144 Hz mode

  • Very low input lag

  • Impressive 4-sided Ambilight system

  • Google TV system offering access to a vast library of applications

  • Backlit remote control, rechargeable via USB-C port

Disadvantages

No like
  • Local dimming needs improvement

  • Only 2 HDMI 2.1 ports

  • No recording function from built-in tuners and no PiP

  • No smaller variants, e.g., 55"

  • Only two HDMI ports in standard 2.1

  • Remote control communicating via infrared (requires aiming at the receiver)

  • Very high price compared to market competition

  • Sound quality noticeably weaker than in the lower model OLED910

  • Slight issues with posterization

Our verdict

The TCL C9K is a television that on paper looks like a show of strength from the manufacturer – thousands of Mini-LED zones, WHVA panel, audio system from Bang & Olufsen, full support for HDR formats, gaming at 144 Hz, and even 288 Hz at lower resolutions. It’s clear that TCL wanted to throw in absolutely everything they had best. And indeed – in many aspects, the C9K can impress. The brightness is enormous, HDR in large scenes can be breathtaking, motion smoothness and gaming capabilities are at a top level, and the sound – considering it’s built into the television – sounds really good. This is a device that can easily be seen as a home entertainment center. But there is also another side to the coin. Brightness management simply falters despite the amazing technical specifications – smaller details often get lost in the shadows or are blown out. And although synthetic tests of contrast or brightness perform exceptionally well, in everyday viewing of movies and series, the effect is no longer so impressive.

To summarize briefly: the C9K is a television full of contrasts – literally and figuratively. It can provide experiences close to top screens, but it's still evident that TCL needs to work on the software and optimization. If someone is looking for a screen for gaming, sports, or spectacular blockbusters – they will be delighted. However, if one expects perfect reproduction of the director's vision and thinks they have managed to buy an absolutely top model at half the price of the competition, unfortunately, they will be disappointed. It's a pity, because the technological potential here is truly vast – it just lacked a bit of common sense in its utilization.

Philips OLED950 is undoubtedly a technological showcase that redefines what we can expect from a home entertainment center in many aspects. The use of groundbreaking Tandem OLED technology means that when it comes to picture quality, we are reaching absolute heights here. The combination of infinite black and perfect contrast with brightness that can exceed the magical barrier of 2000 nits in HDR mode produces effects that, at times, take your breath away. Whether we are watching movies in a sunlit living room or playing games at night with the support of a 4-sided Ambilight system, the experience is simply phenomenal. This is a complete screen that will satisfy both the cinephile seeking fidelity in Dolby Vision and the gamer demanding 144 Hz and perfect motion response.

However, this admiration for the raw performance of the panel is mixed with some disappointment when we look at the manufacturer's promises regarding image processing. Philips strongly promoted the use of a "dual" P5 processor, suggesting that it would be a remedy for all the woes of digital signal processing. However, the reality turned out to be less revolutionary. In our tests, the difference compared to models equipped with the standard, single P5 chip was almost imperceptible in everyday use. Issues with the smoothness of tonal transitions and posterization in difficult scenes, although rare, still occur. Given the astronomical price of this model, we expected a much greater qualitative leap in this aspect that would justify such a high positioning of the equipment. The issue of cost-effectiveness becomes the biggest problem for this otherwise outstanding television. When we look at the market with a cool head, the situation of the 950 model becomes complicated. It's not just about the strong competition from cheaper flagship models like the LG G5 or Samsung S95F, but about the "fratricidal" fight within Philips' own offerings. It turns out that the lower-positioned OLED910 model offers us practically the same brilliant image generated by an identical panel. Moreover, the 910 model wins at the starting gate in terms of audio, offering an integrated soundbar from Bowers & Wilkins, which is simply absent in the more expensive 950 model in favor of a different design. Thus, we encounter a paradox: we get the same picture and worse sound, yet we have to pay significantly more. Therefore, although the OLED950 is a fantastic screen, in 2025 the title of "Best Philips TV" and our recommendation goes to the model OLED910.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
2 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Premium
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Silver
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Where to buy

Contrast and black detail

8.1/10

10/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 3024 (42 x 72)

Contrast:

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

459,000:1

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

72,750:1

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

30,350:1

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

9,800:1

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

12,200:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail
Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail
Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail
Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

What immediately distinguishes the C9K from the C8K model is the number of local dimming zones. In the 65-inch version, we counted… over 3000! One must admit – this is a true showcase of TCL's strength, cramming literally everything they had into this television. On paper, it makes a huge impression and indeed – in less demanding film scenes, the blacks look fantastic. The level is absolutely top-notch, and the separation of lights from dark parts of the image can be breathtaking. The problem is that this impressive specification does not always translate into practice. In our tests, we noticed situations where the C9K, despite having a greater number of zones, stumbled into contrast traps and performed… worse than the C8K. For instance, it cannot perfectly dim the true black bars in 21:9 format films (those with black bars on the top and bottom). Sounds strange? Unfortunately, this is the result of a lack of optimization – the hardware is "packed" with technology, but the algorithms do not always keep up with utilizing that potential.

Don't get us wrong – black is a strong point of the C9K and in many scenes, it simply looks fantastic. In synthetic measurements, the contrast is outstanding, coming close to the level of the best TVs on the market. But in real cinema usage, those numbers do not always correspond to a better experience than in its cheaper cousin. And that is probably the biggest disappointment – because the potential was enormous.

There's no need to elaborate here. Like in every OLED TV, the black level and contrast in the Philips OLED950 are simply perfect. No matter the movie scene being watched, nighttime shots, or materials in 2.39:1 aspect ratio with black bars, you can count on perfect black without bleeding or washout. This is one of the biggest advantages of OLED technology over LCD and Mini-LED TVs. There are no algorithms for local dimming at play here, nor are there any compromises. Black always remains black. The only thing we noticed in our tests is the helicopter scene from the movie Sicario 2. The OLED950 quite clearly highlights details in the shadows. However, this is a characteristic of our test sample, more related to the nature of image reproduction than to the black level itself. In this regard, everything here is top-notch.

HDR effect quality

6.9/10

8.7/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 96.5%, Bt.2020: 80.5%
DCI P3: 99.7%, Bt.2020: 82.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

1425 nit

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

531 nit

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

1277 nit

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

331 nit

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

1424 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

1910 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2084 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2194 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2179 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

1370 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review TCL C9K HDR effect quality
Review Philips OLED950 HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review TCL C9K HDR effect quality
Review Philips OLED950 HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review TCL C9K HDR effect quality
Review Philips OLED950 HDR effect quality

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Review TCL C9K HDR effect quality
Review Philips OLED950 HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

Philips OLED950

HDR luminance

Luminance of RGB colors

TCL C9K

HDR luminance

As we mentioned with black and contrast – the C9K can make a huge impression in synthetic tests. Our measurements showed that on a screen 10% filled with white, the television is capable of squeezing out… 4000 nits of brightness! It sounds astronomical, but – and here, unfortunately, the pattern repeats – the numbers say one thing, and practice says another. In real movie scenes, the situation looks different. At best, when the light effects occupy a large part of the image and the local dimming algorithm does not have to think too hard about what to do with thousands of zones – the effect is really good. At that point, the C9K can reach around 1500 nits, which provides a pleasant, intense flash and can indeed make a positive impression.

The problem starts with smaller elements – such as stars in the sky, the moon, or single reflections. That’s when the proverbial cat comes out of the bag: the algorithms are not yet refined, and brightness drops to even 400–500 nits. That’s a huge difference compared to the potential 4000 nits we saw in laboratory tests. Why does this happen? Most likely, the television is trying to protect the blacks in this way and minimize the halo effect around bright objects. Unfortunately, this comes at the cost of details – some details simply vanish, and the scene loses its nature.

OLED950 is a phenomenal TV for consuming HDR content, which is primarily due to the use of innovative Tandem OLED technology. With this technology, the screen is capable of generating astronomical brightness values, reaching over 2000 nits in movie scenes (on test screens). This is an outstanding result, placing the OLED950 model among the very top displays available on the market. However, it should be noted that there is a specific characteristic of this solution – at moments when full-screen bursts of light appear on the screen, the brightness can drop by as much as half. Nevertheless, it is worth emphasizing that values above 1000 nits on a full screen are still an outstanding result. This allows for HDR images to be displayed exactly as filmmakers would wish, maintaining the dynamics and impact of light scenes.

The use of Tandem OLED technology has also brought measurable benefits in terms of color reproduction, improving elements where traditional WOLED panels have had difficulties compared to QD-OLED competitors. In the case of the OLED950, the color gamut coverage is broader than in classic WOLED panels, reaching nearly 100% of the DCI-P3 space and a solid 82% of the demanding BT.2020 palette. Although these results still do not match the high achievements of QD-OLED panels, the difference diminishes during real-world usage. We cannot deny that in the vast majority of films, colors look simply fantastic on this model – they are saturated, vibrant, and full of depth.

Factory color reproduction

4.5/10

5.5/10

Review TCL C9K Factory color reproduction
Review Philips OLED950 Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review TCL C9K Factory color reproduction
Review Philips OLED950 Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

For color tests, as always, we reached for the Filmmaker mode – a new feature in TCL TVs for 2025. And while the direction itself is a step in the right direction, the execution leaves much to be desired. The white balance in SDR content turned out to be too warm – there was an excess of red. On the other hand, in HDR, it went in the opposite direction: the image became excessively blue. The Colour Checker test revealed quite a few color errors that were noticeable to the naked eye. An even bigger problem turned out to be what we mentioned above – brightness management. Regardless of whether we were watching SDR or HDR content, the image tended to blow out the entire scene, giving it an unnatural, even grotesque character. It's hard to call this a "director-created" mode – because the director has certainly never seen such an image.

We tested the OLED950 model in Movie mode. Although it is theoretically the best and most faithful preset on this television, in practice, it proved to be not without flaws. Interestingly, in the unit we tested, the biggest challenge wasn't the white balance itself – although it did have a slight tendency to give the image a pinkish tint. The main problem lay in the way the television managed brightness, both in everyday SDR content and in demanding HDR scenes. Analysis of the gamma chart and EOTF curve leads to one key conclusion: the television excessively highlights brightness in the lower registers. This results in the image appearing less contrasty than the panel technology would allow. Details in dark areas that should remain perfectly black (characteristic of "OLED black") are simply unnecessarily highlighted and brightened. Fortunately, these errors can be corrected using the appropriate tools, so – as always – we proceeded with professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

9.4/10

Review TCL C9K Color reproduction after calibration
Review Philips OLED950 Color reproduction after calibration
Review TCL C9K Color reproduction after calibration
Review Philips OLED950 Color reproduction after calibration

After calibration, we finally managed to tame the white balance – and it immediately translated into a more natural image. Colors finally started to look the way they should, and the overall presentation was incomparably better than in the factory settings. In other words – it’s worth taking a moment to improve this, as the gain is truly significant. The gamma responsible for managing brightness was also brought into order in SDR content, and the effect was more than satisfying. Unfortunately, when we turned on HDR materials, the situation quickly became complicated. No matter how we set the local dimming, the television had a tendency to do what it liked with the image – either it overexposed everything or dimmed the darkest parts too much. Exactly as we saw in the scene from the movie Billy Lynn. So, the color improvement after calibration makes a great impression, but brightness management in HDR remains the Achilles' heel of C9K and presents a certain technological limitation.

As can be seen, the OLED950 transforms into an absolutely phenomenal display after a professional calibration process, which without a shadow of a doubt can be placed in the same category as the best televisions currently available in the world. This equipment only needed a professional touch to show its full potential and eliminate factory shortcomings. The minimal errors in reproduction in Color Checker tests and the fidelity of the color palette speak for themselves. We are dealing with an almost perfect device here. A true window to the world, offering top-notch image quality.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.7/10

7.1/10

Review TCL C9K Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips OLED950 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C9K Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips OLED950 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C9K Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips OLED950 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C9K Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips OLED950 Smoothness of tonal transitions

In terms of the smoothness of tonal transitions, TCL C9K performs really well. In more challenging movie scenes, there is no typical color banding that can break immersion even in more expensive TVs. Perhaps slight issues can be noticed in the brightest parts – for example, in scenes from the movie Kingstone – but these are nuances. For the vast majority of viewers, especially with 4K content, color grading will look smooth and practically unnoticeable.

If we had to point out the weaker point of the OLED950 model compared to market competitors like the G5 or S95F, it would be, as with most TVs from this manufacturer, the digital signal processing. Although the processor used here is referred to as a "dual" processor, our tests did not show significant changes compared to the lower-positioned OLED910 model. The differences are in reality symbolic, which was reflected in only a cosmetic increase in the rating in this category. In very demanding, especially dark scenes, one can still occasionally notice issues with slight posterization. However, it should be clearly emphasized that this is a "flaw" that an average viewer very rarely notices during normal usage, and the overall reception remains at a high level.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5.5/10

7.1/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Review TCL C9K Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips OLED950 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review TCL C9K Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips OLED950 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Digital image processing in TCL C9K is quite mediocre. The tonal smoothing feature seems to be present, but turning it on practically changes nothing – color bands are still visible, and it can unintentionally highlight elements we would prefer to hide, such as textures of objects. Fortunately, it doesn’t remove film grain, but that’s small comfort since the effects are still poor. Therefore, it's hard to recommend using this option.

On the other hand, image scaling performs much better. Lower quality materials look quite decent – characters and backgrounds are presented clearly, although, of course, with sources at 576p, physics cannot be fooled. Sometimes, characteristic aliasing on objects appears, but that’s the fault of the source itself, not the algorithm. A plus for not having issues with overscan – the image is not artificially cropped or enlarged.

Upscaling

In terms of image scaling, the proprietary P5 processor performs just as well as in most models from this manufacturer. Lower resolution content takes on a very soft and plastic character. Such a presentation will certainly appeal to many. However, if you prefer sharper contours, you can gently enhance them with the appropriate slider in the TV menu. In this aspect, it's really hard to pick on anything. The image simply looks very good and additionally there is no problem with the phenomenon of overscan.

Smoothing and Distortion Reduction

The tonal transition smoothing feature fares a bit worse. In the settings, we find an option called “Distortion Reduction.” This allows for three levels of processor intervention adjustment. Unfortunately, the Minimum setting works poorly and the smoothing effects are negligible. The Medium level gives a decent result, but it also starts to smooth out the skin details of actors. On the other hand, the Maximum setting works too aggressively. It removes definitely too many details from the face and background elements or can even take away the film grain. To achieve the optimal effect, it's worth playing around with these settings at home and adjusting them to your preferences. It might seem that the Medium option represents the best compromise here.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.8/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
No
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
No
Brightness drop with BFI
51%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur (1080p@288Hz):

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Like the C8K, the C9K is also a really fast television – both figuratively and literally. It features a 4K panel with a refresh rate of 144 Hz, and at lower resolutions, the display can even ramp up to 288 Hz. This speed translates into practice – when watching sports or playing games, the image looks very smooth and clear. Additionally, in films, we get an extra motion smoother called Motion Clarity, which allows us to adjust the fluidity to our own preferences – from the cinematic "judder" frame to almost theatrical smoothness.

The motion representation in the OLED950 model is virtually perfect. This is typical for screens of this type (OLED 120Hz+), as the matrix shows no blurring at all. Thanks to this, we can enjoy flawless sharpness in practically any conditions. A big part of this is not only due to the specifics of organic technology. Equally important work is done by the smoothing systems implemented by the manufacturer.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 288Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

For gaming, the TCL C9K is a complete tool. Here we have two (out of four) HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gbps, so all key technologies work: VRR (variable refresh rate) and ALLM (automatic low latency mode). Additionally, the manufacturer added a really intuitive Game Bar, which allows you to quickly preview the most important parameters and adjust settings without digging through the menu. Also, TCL's policy is a plus – the TV is not afraid of any HDR formats, even in game mode. Whether it's HGiG or Dolby Vision for the Xbox Series S/X console – everything works as it should, giving the player wide freedom.

OLED950 is almost the perfect TV for gamers. This is not only due to the unique atmosphere that the Ambilight system creates during gameplay. The most important aspect here is the solid hardware support. We find literally everything that one should expect from a modern gaming screen today. The manufacturer has implemented two HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gb/s. This gives us access to gaming in 4K resolution at 120 frames per second. Of course, support for VRR technology and the ALLM automatic game mode is also included. The device handles any HDR signal effortlessly, whether we are using Dolby Vision or the HGiG standard.

Access to all settings is available from one place thanks to the special Game Bar overlay. Although this interface may not be the most graphically attractive on the market, it fully serves its purpose. It displays all the most important signal parameters and offers useful additions. Gamers can take advantage of the mini-map zoom function or add a permanent crosshair on the screen, which can be seen as a small aid in online competition. Adjusting the contrast range also proves useful. It allows for brightening shadows and achieving better visibility of enemies hidden in the dark corners of the map.

Input lag

9.8/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
12 ms
1080p120
7 ms
5 ms
2160p60
16 ms
12 ms
2160p120
7 ms
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
16 ms
12 ms
2160p120
7 ms
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
16 ms
12 ms
2160p120 DV
7 ms
5 ms

In terms of input lag, the TCL C9K performs exceptionally well. With 120 Hz content, the lag is just 7 ms, placing it among the very best TVs available on the market. Naturally, with 60 Hz materials, the input lag rises to about 15-16 ms, but in practice, this has little impact on the final responsiveness of the screen to our actions on the pad.

According to what we have come to expect from televisions in this segment, the signal delay in this model is practically negligible. Our measurements indicated nearly reference values: just 5 ms at a refresh rate of 120 Hz and 12 ms for a 60 Hz signal. This means an instantaneous response to every command issued via a controller, mouse, or keyboard. With such low results, the only limitation during dynamic online gameplay is now just your own reflexes and lack of "skill," not the hardware. 😉

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

6.5/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
7ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RGB
BWRG
Max refresh rate
144Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes
Review TCL C9K Compatibility with PC
Review Philips OLED950 Compatibility with PC

In terms of office work, the TCL C9K does not disappoint – thanks to the support for 4:4:4 chroma, the readability of fonts is at a good level, so writing or working with documents should not pose a problem. One could indeed notice slight issues with dimming horizontal lines, but in everyday use, it’s hard to call that a real flaw. However, the C9K reveals its greatest potential in PC gaming. Here, the television showcases its full capabilities – it can switch to lower resolutions, such as Full HD, and display images at up to 288 Hz. Additionally, it supports both G-Sync and FreeSync, so image synchronization with the graphics card works flawlessly. It’s hard to have any major complaints about this set – it’s truly a top-tier screen for computer gaming.

In this category, the situation looks quite specific. If we look at the OLED950 through the lens of a gamer, we get a phenomenal display. It works excellently not only with consoles but also in combination with a powerful computer. We have access to an additional 144 Hz mode, full support for G-Sync and FreeSync technologies, as well as very low signal latency. One could therefore risk stating that for PC gamers, this is an almost ideal monitor.

However, problems arise when we examine the readability of the fonts. We're not just talking about the unusual subpixel arrangement of the WOLED panels (BWRG), which in all televisions of this type causes a specific coloration of text edges. The tested model struggles with correctly displaying Chroma 4:4:4 sampling. This is mainly visible when we display colored text on another colorful background. The letters then gain strange shading, unnatural contours, and unwanted artifacts. It's a bit of a shame, although one must honestly admit that this is a very specific flaw. For 99% of you, no one is likely to notice this during normal entertainment. However, if you belong to that 1% of people planning to purchase the OLED950 strictly as a monitor for office work, you may feel disappointed.

Viewing angles

4.5/10

7.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
75%
29%

A new feature in TCL televisions for 2025 is the WHVA panel, which is designed to provide better viewing angles than standard VA panels. And indeed, there is noticeable progress. When viewing the screen from the side, the image is clearer and colors do not degrade as quickly as in previous models. However, this does not mean that we are dealing with the level of top coatings or solutions known from IPS panels, and certainly not from OLEDs. The image remains readable, but brightness clearly decreases. This is definitely a step forward compared to earlier TCL models, but it is not yet a complete revolution.

As befits organic technology, the viewing angles here are practically very good. We can enjoy a great picture regardless of where we sit on the sofa while looking at the screen. The only reservation comes when directly comparing the used Tandem OLED matrix with the competition's solutions. Compared to last year's LG panels equipped with the MLA filter or the best QD-OLED screens from Samsung, the angles in the OLED950 are slightly weaker. They are not as perfect as those of the mentioned rivals. Nevertheless, they still generally maintain a very high level, and in everyday use, it's hard to consider this a drawback.

Daytime performance

7/10

7.3/10

Panel finish
Glare
Glare
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Very Good
Review TCL C9K Daytime performance
Review Philips OLED950 Daytime performance
Review TCL C9K Daytime performance
Review Philips OLED950 Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

Philips OLED950: 615 cd/m2

TCL C9K: 642 cd/m2

The new WHVA matrix coating has its strengths and weaknesses. On one hand, it manages quite well with minor reflections; on the other hand, with stronger light sources, it is evident that the reflection suppression is not at the highest level. Fortunately, the coating does not spoil what is most important: the blacks and color saturation. This is a definite plus, as in many competing models, the compromises in this area are more painful. Additionally, there is very high brightness – in SDR content, the C9K can achieve an average of 650 nits in SDR materials. This result is easily sufficient for watching television or movies in more challenging lighting conditions, even on sunny days.

The OLED950 model works perfectly well in really bright rooms without concerns. The key advantage here is the previously mentioned very high brightness of the panel. In terms of OLED technology, the performance is impressive. It can confidently be stated that in this regard, this television is capable of competing with mid-range Mini-LED models. In the world of organic panels, this is not at all obvious, which is a significant plus for the tested device.

However, there is one drawback that can be described as its Achilles' heel. Similar to most Tandem OLED panels, the manufacturer has used a glossy screen coating here. Unfortunately, it does not handle direct light reflections very well. It's worth keeping this in mind when planning the TV’s placement relative to windows, as reflections may be visible.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
Software version during testing
V8-0012T01-LF1V538.002459
Image processor
MT5896 2,5 GB RAM
MT5896

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review TCL C9K TV Panel details
Review Philips OLED950 TV Panel details

TV features

7.7/10

6.5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review TCL C9K TV features
Review TCL C9K TV features
Review TCL C9K TV features
Review TCL C9K TV features
Review TCL C9K TV features
Review TCL C9K TV features
Review TCL C9K TV features
Review TCL C9K TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features

Classic TV Features

In terms of basic TV features, the TCL C9K does not disappoint – it has everything that most users expect. The EPG guide works smoothly, teletext is available, and pairing Bluetooth headphones, a mouse, or a keyboard is straightforward. However, it should be noted that in the Google TV system – just like in other TCL models – there are no more advanced options, such as recording programs or picture-in-picture (PiP) mode. Some may find this lacking, especially if they have used such features with competitors. It's also worth mentioning that we only have one USB port available – enough to connect a drive with movies or a flash drive, but if someone plans to use multiple devices, they might find this insufficient.

Smart Features

While the TCL C9K does not stand out in terms of classic solutions, it showcases its full potential in the realm of smart features. The Google TV system is currently the most popular platform, and it's easy to see why – the library of applications is vast. Netflix, YouTube, Disney+, HBO Max, Amazon Prime Video – all are readily available. Only those very attached to more closed ecosystems, such as Apple Music, will feel the gaps. A significant advantage is the built-in voice assistant – it works quickly, understands natural commands, and allows for convenient control of the TV: from switching channels to opening applications, to searching for content or checking the weather. It is in this aspect that the TCL C9K shows that a smart TV is more than just a "TV with the internet" – it is a tool that truly simplifies daily use of the device.

Smart Features

The biggest advantage of the OLED950 is the Google TV system — the manufacturer is increasingly moving away from it in cheaper models in favor of TitanOS, but here we fortunately still have a fully functional environment based on Android. This means access to a vast library of applications, a voice assistant, and convenient features like Chromecast. For unknown reasons, our editorial team was once again unable to launch Windows Miracast, despite the manufacturer declaring that this option is available. On the positive side: Apple device users can rest easy, as the television supports AirPlay.

Classic Features

In terms of "classics," the television offers a rather basic set: teletext and Bluetooth connectivity. The most criticisms are directed at the remote control. On one hand, it is sensibly designed, has backlighting, "hybrid" switching between the control of typical functions and a numeric keypad, and charges via USB-C. On the other hand, enthusiasm quickly fades when it turns out you need to point it at the screen, as it operates on infrared.

Apps

9.6/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.2/10

9.5/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
Yes
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

C9K easily handled most of the materials we uploaded to the pendrive – from MKV format films, through older AVI files, to DTS and FLAC audio tracks. The only drawback remains the lack of support for HEIC format photos from Apple devices, but this is a common issue with almost all manufacturers. The most important thing, however, is that if someone finds a lack of support for some exotic format, they can always reach for an alternative player available in the Google Play store. And this is where the advantage of the Google TV system is evident – the ease with which you can extend the capabilities of the television with additional applications.

The built-in file player in the OLED950 model works wonderfully. During our tests, the device handled practically every format we provided. Whether they were video files, audio tracks, or photos, the TV played them without any issues. It’s hard to find any weak points in handling the most popular standards. However, if someone still finds something lacking (which seems unlikely), the operating system comes to the rescue. With the presence of Google TV, we are not limited to just the default solutions. At any moment, one can enter the app store and install an external player, such as the popular VLC or Kodi. This ensures that the TV can handle literally any file from our home library.

Sound

7.9/10

8.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    77dB
    85dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

The sound in the TCL C9K is handled by the same system as in the C8K model – developed together with Bang & Olufsen. It is a 4.2.2 configuration with a total power of 90 W, meaning eight speakers placed to create a fuller sense of space. And I must admit – the effect is impressive. Dialogues are clear, the high and mid tones sound pure, and the bass doesn't fade, even during louder screenings. Of course, this won't replace a dedicated soundbar or home theater system, but for built-in speakers – there is really something worth listening to.

*During tests at maximum volume, we noticed unusual behavior from the audio system. When the slider is set to 100%, the TV reaches about 76–78 dB, but you can hear that it tries to generate more power, after which the volume level is immediately corrected to the mentioned value. On the other hand, when we lower the volume to, for example, 70%, it first drops as expected but then slowly rises back to the same level of 76 dB. This effect gives the impression of an aggressive limiter that always brings the volume to one level, regardless of the position of the slider. We checked this behavior multiple times, and in every case, the result was identical – no additional "smart" volume adjustment or AI features were active during this testing.

The 2.1 speaker system used here, with a total power of 70 W, provides a solid dose of quality sound. It plays clearly, and thanks to the additional subwoofer at the back of the case, the sound is deep and has a distinct punch. This element is often missing in cheaper models, where the bass is practically nonexistent. However, we must face the truth when comparing it to the OLED910 model. That TV, equipped with a built-in Bowers & Wilkins soundbar, simply sounds much better. Was it a good decision? In our opinion, the outstanding audio from the 910 model adds greater value. Choosing the 950 model makes sense mainly if you're big fans of Ambilight, and the sound issue is taken care of by your external home theater or soundbar.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

77dBC (Max)

75dBC

No acoustic data