TCL C9K vs Philips OLED820

Direct compare

C9K

Available screen sizes: 65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 42”48”55”65”77”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3810x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.7

8.0

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.4

    8.3

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    7.0

    8.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.8

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    8.9

    9.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    6.5

  • Watching in bright light

    7.0

    5.7

  • Utility functions

    7.7

    6.8

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    7.9

    7.7

Advantages

  • Very good contrast and black

  • Very high brightness

  • Support for all HDR formats including Dolby Vision

  • Fast 144Hz panel - for gaming and sports fans

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, low input lag, etc.

  • GoogleTV operating system with a wide range of applications

  • Great sound branded by Bang & Olufsen

  • Improved viewing angles thanks to WHVA panel

  • Ideal contrast and black thanks to the WOLED panel

  • High HDR brightness (up to 1300 nits) and wide coverage of the DCI-P3 color palette (99%)

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Great motion fluidity, no motion blur, refresh rate up to 144 Hz

  • Full support for gamers: HDMI 2.1 (2 ports), VRR, ALLM, HGiG, Dolby Vision in games, low input lag

  • Ambilight, which realistically affects image perception and distinguishes the TV from the competition

  • GoogleTV system with a huge app base and great voice assistant

  • Extras in the form of: Backlit remote and rotating stand

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS:X audio formats

Disadvantages

No like
  • Local dimming needs improvement

  • Only 2 HDMI 2.1 ports

  • No recording function from built-in tuners and no PiP

  • No smaller variants, e.g., 55"

  • Only two HDMI 2.1 ports (with 2 consoles and a soundbar, we are forced to "juggle" the cables)

  • Lack of many classic "TV" features, e.g., USB recording or PiP mode, the infrared remote can be annoying

  • Slight issues with color matching (much better than last year but far from the competition)

  • Font readability issues when working with PC (lack of full Chroma 4:4:4 support)

Our verdict

The TCL C9K is a television that on paper looks like a show of strength from the manufacturer – thousands of Mini-LED zones, WHVA panel, audio system from Bang & Olufsen, full support for HDR formats, gaming at 144 Hz, and even 288 Hz at lower resolutions. It’s clear that TCL wanted to throw in absolutely everything they had best. And indeed – in many aspects, the C9K can impress. The brightness is enormous, HDR in large scenes can be breathtaking, motion smoothness and gaming capabilities are at a top level, and the sound – considering it’s built into the television – sounds really good. This is a device that can easily be seen as a home entertainment center. But there is also another side to the coin. Brightness management simply falters despite the amazing technical specifications – smaller details often get lost in the shadows or are blown out. And although synthetic tests of contrast or brightness perform exceptionally well, in everyday viewing of movies and series, the effect is no longer so impressive.

To summarize briefly: the C9K is a television full of contrasts – literally and figuratively. It can provide experiences close to top screens, but it's still evident that TCL needs to work on the software and optimization. If someone is looking for a screen for gaming, sports, or spectacular blockbusters – they will be delighted. However, if one expects perfect reproduction of the director's vision and thinks they have managed to buy an absolutely top model at half the price of the competition, unfortunately, they will be disappointed. It's a pity, because the technological potential here is truly vast – it just lacked a bit of common sense in its utilization.

The Philips OLED820 is a very successful and significant step forward compared to last year's model, the OLED 819. For many people, the main reason for purchasing it will, of course, be Ambilight: the multi-colored lighting system that sets Philips TVs apart from the competition. It’s no surprise, as it made a huge impression on us as well. It's not just an impressive gadget, but a real addition that can change the perception of the content being watched and add depth to it. However, Ambilight should not overshadow what the OLED820 offers as a screen. Here we have almost infinite contrast, high brightness in HDR films, and excellent color reproduction, which improves even more after slight tweaking or professional calibration. This setup guarantees one of the best pictures available on the market today, and we are also aware that the TV offers something unique and unprecedented elsewhere. It is also equipment that works well for gaming. A 144 Hz panel and HDMI 2.1 ports open up access to the full capabilities of new-generation consoles, and low input lag makes gameplay exceptionally responsive. The operating system also deserves praise – Google TV. This is a much better solution than the proprietary Titan OS found in lower-end Philips models, such as the OLED770. And this is a serious argument for paying extra for this model. A larger app library, a more efficient voice assistant, and fewer system errors contribute to a noticeably better everyday experience. Of course, the Philips OLED 820 is not free from minor shortcomings – some software issues are apparent, and certain features could be better refined. Nevertheless, the overall presentation is very solid. Perhaps the OLED820 is not a revolutionary TV, but it is a very successful and well-balanced option in Philips’ lineup. It combines excellent picture quality, a complete set of features for gamers, and a unique addition in the form of Ambilight. If you’re looking for a solid mid-range OLED that not only offers good picture quality but also something distinctive and exceptional, the OLED820 should be high on your shopping list.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Premium
Stand type
Central
Central
Stand type
stand-type-Silver
stand-type-Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Swivel
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

8.1/10

10/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 3024 (42 x 72)

Contrast:

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

459,000:1

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

72,750:1

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

30,350:1

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

9,800:1

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

12,200:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

What immediately distinguishes the C9K from the C8K model is the number of local dimming zones. In the 65-inch version, we counted… over 3000! One must admit – this is a true showcase of TCL's strength, cramming literally everything they had into this television. On paper, it makes a huge impression and indeed – in less demanding film scenes, the blacks look fantastic. The level is absolutely top-notch, and the separation of lights from dark parts of the image can be breathtaking. The problem is that this impressive specification does not always translate into practice. In our tests, we noticed situations where the C9K, despite having a greater number of zones, stumbled into contrast traps and performed… worse than the C8K. For instance, it cannot perfectly dim the true black bars in 21:9 format films (those with black bars on the top and bottom). Sounds strange? Unfortunately, this is the result of a lack of optimization – the hardware is "packed" with technology, but the algorithms do not always keep up with utilizing that potential.

Don't get us wrong – black is a strong point of the C9K and in many scenes, it simply looks fantastic. In synthetic measurements, the contrast is outstanding, coming close to the level of the best TVs on the market. But in real cinema usage, those numbers do not always correspond to a better experience than in its cheaper cousin. And that is probably the biggest disappointment – because the potential was enormous.

Contrast and black are the domain of OLEDs, and the Philips OLED820 is no exception. The WOLED panel from LG Display works the same as in the LG C5 models or the Samsung S90F, providing exactly what we expect – perfect black and infinite contrast. Whether we are watching challenging scenes full of fine details or simpler frames flooded with uniform black, the television always performs excellently. It separates light from darkness with surgical precision, creating an extraordinary sense of depth in the image. And while different technologies can be debated, in this category, OLED simply reigns, and the Philips OLED820 only confirms this rule.

HDR effect quality

6.9/10

7.5/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 96.5%, Bt.2020: 80.5%
DCI P3: 99.3%, Bt.2020: 76.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

1425 nit

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

531 nit

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

1277 nit

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

331 nit

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

1424 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1035 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1235 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1356 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1315 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

521 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

HDR luminance chart:

Philips OLED820

Luminancja HDR

Luminance of RGB colors

TCL C9K

Luminancja HDR

Luminance of RGB colors

As we mentioned with black and contrast – the C9K can make a huge impression in synthetic tests. Our measurements showed that on a screen 10% filled with white, the television is capable of squeezing out… 4000 nits of brightness! It sounds astronomical, but – and here, unfortunately, the pattern repeats – the numbers say one thing, and practice says another. In real movie scenes, the situation looks different. At best, when the light effects occupy a large part of the image and the local dimming algorithm does not have to think too hard about what to do with thousands of zones – the effect is really good. At that point, the C9K can reach around 1500 nits, which provides a pleasant, intense flash and can indeed make a positive impression.

The problem starts with smaller elements – such as stars in the sky, the moon, or single reflections. That’s when the proverbial cat comes out of the bag: the algorithms are not yet refined, and brightness drops to even 400–500 nits. That’s a huge difference compared to the potential 4000 nits we saw in laboratory tests. Why does this happen? Most likely, the television is trying to protect the blacks in this way and minimize the halo effect around bright objects. Unfortunately, this comes at the cost of details – some details simply vanish, and the scene loses its nature.

When it comes to HDR quality, the Philips OLED820 uses the same class of WOLED panel that we find in its biggest competitors – LG C5 or Samsung S90F. This means we can count on truly solid performance. This year, mid-range OLED panels are capable of exceeding the threshold of a thousand nits, and the model tested reaches around 1300 nits in some films. This is an outstanding result that allows for an extremely precise depiction of the director's vision, as contemporary productions are mastered in such brightness ranges. Of course, there are situations where even the OLED820 has to compromise. Full-screen scenes flooded with white, like those in the movie The Meg, can drop brightness to 400–500 nits, which clearly weakens the effect. This is a characteristic of OLED technology that has not yet been fully eliminated. Despite this limitation, it is hard not to appreciate the HDR in this model – high luminance and wide coverage of the DCI-P3 color gamut at 99% make the picture simply look great.

Factory color reproduction

4.5/10

6.7/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

For color tests, as always, we reached for the Filmmaker mode – a new feature in TCL TVs for 2025. And while the direction itself is a step in the right direction, the execution leaves much to be desired. The white balance in SDR content turned out to be too warm – there was an excess of red. On the other hand, in HDR, it went in the opposite direction: the image became excessively blue. The Colour Checker test revealed quite a few color errors that were noticeable to the naked eye. An even bigger problem turned out to be what we mentioned above – brightness management. Regardless of whether we were watching SDR or HDR content, the image tended to blow out the entire scene, giving it an unnatural, even grotesque character. It's hard to call this a "director-created" mode – because the director has certainly never seen such an image.

The color reproduction in the factory settings really surprised us, and positively so. The Philips OLED820, switched to Filmmaker mode, immediately showed that it was quite well tuned in terms of color. The white balance was relatively accurate, though with a slight lack in the blue hue, which sometimes gave the image a slightly yellowish tint. However, this is not a flaw that particularly interferes with everyday viewing. A larger problem arose with the brightness characteristic. The gamma chart clearly deviated from the ideal, with the line being below the expected values, causing the image to be overly brightened, and the colors looked as if they were covered with a light milky filter. This effect was also noticeable in tests using the Colour Checker pattern, where more pronounced errors appeared.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

9.3/10

After calibration, we finally managed to tame the white balance – and it immediately translated into a more natural image. Colors finally started to look the way they should, and the overall presentation was incomparably better than in the factory settings. In other words – it’s worth taking a moment to improve this, as the gain is truly significant. The gamma responsible for managing brightness was also brought into order in SDR content, and the effect was more than satisfying. Unfortunately, when we turned on HDR materials, the situation quickly became complicated. No matter how we set the local dimming, the television had a tendency to do what it liked with the image – either it overexposed everything or dimmed the darkest parts too much. Exactly as we saw in the scene from the movie Billy Lynn. So, the color improvement after calibration makes a great impression, but brightness management in HDR remains the Achilles' heel of C9K and presents a certain technological limitation.

After calibration, both the Filmmaker mode and the game mode gained quite a lot. A slight adjustment of the white balance and an improvement in brightness characteristics resulted in excellent outcomes for SDR content – the image looked almost perfect, natural and very close to the reference. In the case of HDR materials, the situation was similar; the colors looked stunning and it was hard to find anything to criticize. However, we noticed a certain feature that we had already pointed out when comparing scenes from the movie Billy Lynn. An analysis of the EOTF curve revealed that the television has a slight tendency to dim details in the blacks, which means that the darkest sections are not always displayed exactly as the director intended. Nevertheless, the effect after calibration is remarkable, and the OLED820 stands out as one of the more interesting screens in its class. It just needs a little bit of fine-tuning, and there's really nothing to be afraid of.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.7/10

6.5/10

In terms of the smoothness of tonal transitions, TCL C9K performs really well. In more challenging movie scenes, there is no typical color banding that can break immersion even in more expensive TVs. Perhaps slight issues can be noticed in the brightest parts – for example, in scenes from the movie Kingstone – but these are nuances. For the vast majority of viewers, especially with 4K content, color grading will look smooth and practically unnoticeable.

The fluidity of tonal transitions is unfortunately the Achilles' heel of the Philips OLED820. During tests, we noticed slight issues with color blending – both in bright and darker scenes, one can see characteristic banding, which detracts from the naturalness of the image. It must be admitted that compared to last year's OLED 819 model, there is a significant improvement, but nonetheless, the competition performs better in this category.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5.5/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Digital image processing in TCL C9K is quite mediocre. The tonal smoothing feature seems to be present, but turning it on practically changes nothing – color bands are still visible, and it can unintentionally highlight elements we would prefer to hide, such as textures of objects. Fortunately, it doesn’t remove film grain, but that’s small comfort since the effects are still poor. Therefore, it's hard to recommend using this option.

On the other hand, image scaling performs much better. Lower quality materials look quite decent – characters and backgrounds are presented clearly, although, of course, with sources at 576p, physics cannot be fooled. Sometimes, characteristic aliasing on objects appears, but that’s the fault of the source itself, not the algorithm. A plus for not having issues with overscan – the image is not artificially cropped or enlarged.

Fortunately, the earlier effects of the aforementioned posterization can be quite effectively mitigated. The "distortion reduction" feature set to medium handles unwanted color banding, improving the smoothness of tonal transitions. It does happen, however, that it works a bit too aggressively and smooths out some details – such as minor skin imperfections of the actors – but despite this, it can be considered worth using without major compromises. The upscaling in the OLED820 also performs well. The test image with the model is exceptionally soft, sometimes even too much so, although this can be alleviated by slightly increasing the sharpness in the picture menu – it’s a matter of personal preference. The lack of overscan issues with very low-resolution content is also commendable, meaning we don't have to worry that the image will be unnecessarily cropped.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.8/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
No
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
No
Brightness drop with BFI
51%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Smużenie (1080p@288Hz):

Smużenie (4K@144Hz):

Like the C8K, the C9K is also a really fast television – both figuratively and literally. It features a 4K panel with a refresh rate of 144 Hz, and at lower resolutions, the display can even ramp up to 288 Hz. This speed translates into practice – when watching sports or playing games, the image looks very smooth and clear. Additionally, in films, we get an extra motion smoother called Motion Clarity, which allows us to adjust the fluidity to our own preferences – from the cinematic "judder" frame to almost theatrical smoothness.

Motion fluidity is an area where OLEDs always shine, and the Philips OLED820 confirms this rule. The panel itself offers a refresh rate of 144 Hz, which will mainly benefit PC gamers, but even with standard television sources or consoles, where 120 Hz is used, the motion is fast, sharp, and simultaneously smooth, without traces of ghosting. This is thanks to the outstanding response time between pixels, which ensures the image retains clarity in every dynamic scene. The manufacturer has also added its own smoothing feature called "Motion Style." In the menu, we find two sliders – the first, responsible for fluidity, allows us to adjust the amount of artificially added frames in movies. This way, we can choose a raw, cinematic character with a clearly visible film frame or a more theatrical image with smooth motion. The second slider is for reducing blurring, especially useful in sports broadcasts. Here, we definitely recommend setting it to the maximum value, as the effect is truly excellent.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 288Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

For gaming, the TCL C9K is a complete tool. Here we have two (out of four) HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gbps, so all key technologies work: VRR (variable refresh rate) and ALLM (automatic low latency mode). Additionally, the manufacturer added a really intuitive Game Bar, which allows you to quickly preview the most important parameters and adjust settings without digging through the menu. Also, TCL's policy is a plus – the TV is not afraid of any HDR formats, even in game mode. Whether it's HGiG or Dolby Vision for the Xbox Series S/X console – everything works as it should, giving the player wide freedom.

Philips OLED820 is one of the most complete televisions for gamers. It practically has everything you could expect: two HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gbps (too bad there aren't four), variable refresh rate VRR, automatic game mode ALLM, support for Dolby Vision in games, and a good implementation of the HGiG mode. The television also handles lower resolutions at 120 Hz without any issues, so you can count on great flexibility when choosing different picture modes on the console. Philips also adds Game Bar – a panel that allows you to change picture modes, add a crosshair, or view parameters. Although it looks quite clunky and is less polished than that of the competition, it serves its purpose. In practice, therefore, the OLED820, besides having a full set of four HDMI 2.1 ports, offers almost everything a gamer might need.

Input lag

9.8/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
13 ms
1080p120
7 ms
5 ms
2160p60
16 ms
13 ms
2160p120
7 ms
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
16 ms
13 ms
2160p120
7 ms
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
16 ms
13 ms
2160p120 DV
7 ms
5 ms

In terms of input lag, the TCL C9K performs exceptionally well. With 120 Hz content, the lag is just 7 ms, placing it among the very best TVs available on the market. Naturally, with 60 Hz materials, the input lag rises to about 15-16 ms, but in practice, this has little impact on the final responsiveness of the screen to our actions on the pad.

The input lag in the Philips OLED820 is truly at a reference level. The measurement showed values below 5 ms, which places it at the very top of the TVs available on the market. Even the Dolby Vision mode does not cause problems in this regard, which is quite a rare phenomenon. In practice, this means lightning-fast responses to every movement, no noticeable delays, and full comfort in dynamic games. In short, outstanding results that will please even the most demanding gamers.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

6.5/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
7ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RGB
RWBG
Max refresh rate
144Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

In terms of office work, the TCL C9K does not disappoint – thanks to the support for 4:4:4 chroma, the readability of fonts is at a good level, so writing or working with documents should not pose a problem. One could indeed notice slight issues with dimming horizontal lines, but in everyday use, it’s hard to call that a real flaw. However, the C9K reveals its greatest potential in PC gaming. Here, the television showcases its full capabilities – it can switch to lower resolutions, such as Full HD, and display images at up to 288 Hz. Additionally, it supports both G-Sync and FreeSync, so image synchronization with the graphics card works flawlessly. It’s hard to have any major complaints about this set – it’s truly a top-tier screen for computer gaming.

Collaboration with a PC for the Philips OLED820 varies depending on the application. For gaming, it performs exceptionally well: a high refresh rate of 144 Hz combined with G-Sync support provides smoothness and responsiveness that other televisions would envy. The situation is less favorable when it comes to text work. The lack of proper implementation of chroma 4:4:4 causes fonts on colored backgrounds to be slightly blurred, which significantly lowers work comfort. Therefore, it's hard to recommend the OLED820 as a screen for office work with text or numbers. It's a pity that the manufacturer didn't learn from last year's models and this flaw continues to persist.

Viewing angles

4.5/10

7.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
75%
34%

A new feature in TCL televisions for 2025 is the WHVA panel, which is designed to provide better viewing angles than standard VA panels. And indeed, there is noticeable progress. When viewing the screen from the side, the image is clearer and colors do not degrade as quickly as in previous models. However, this does not mean that we are dealing with the level of top coatings or solutions known from IPS panels, and certainly not from OLEDs. The image remains readable, but brightness clearly decreases. This is definitely a step forward compared to earlier TCL models, but it is not yet a complete revolution.

The viewing angles on the Philips OLED820 are another advantage that should delight you. OLEDs have always been characterized by nearly perfect angles, so no matter where we look from, the image remains clear and readable. Indeed, the classic WOLED matrix does not match technologies like MLA OLED or QD-OLED, but it's still hard to criticize anything here. The angles are simply excellent.

TV efficiency during daytime

7/10

5.7/10

Matrix coating
Glare
Glare
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Very Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

Philips OLED820: 345 cd/m2

TCL C9K: 642 cd/m2

The new WHVA matrix coating has its strengths and weaknesses. On one hand, it manages quite well with minor reflections; on the other hand, with stronger light sources, it is evident that the reflection suppression is not at the highest level. Fortunately, the coating does not spoil what is most important: the blacks and color saturation. This is a definite plus, as in many competing models, the compromises in this area are more painful. Additionally, there is very high brightness – in SDR content, the C9K can achieve an average of 650 nits in SDR materials. This result is easily sufficient for watching television or movies in more challenging lighting conditions, even on sunny days.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
Software version during testing
V8-0012T01-LF1V538.002459
TPM231WW_R.201.100.146.207
Image processor
MT5896 2,5 GB RAM
MT5896 3GB

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

TV features

7.7/10

6.8/10

  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Wyszukiwanie głosowe
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes

Classic TV Features

In terms of basic TV features, the TCL C9K does not disappoint – it has everything that most users expect. The EPG guide works smoothly, teletext is available, and pairing Bluetooth headphones, a mouse, or a keyboard is straightforward. However, it should be noted that in the Google TV system – just like in other TCL models – there are no more advanced options, such as recording programs or picture-in-picture (PiP) mode. Some may find this lacking, especially if they have used such features with competitors. It's also worth mentioning that we only have one USB port available – enough to connect a drive with movies or a flash drive, but if someone plans to use multiple devices, they might find this insufficient.

Smart Features

While the TCL C9K does not stand out in terms of classic solutions, it showcases its full potential in the realm of smart features. The Google TV system is currently the most popular platform, and it's easy to see why – the library of applications is vast. Netflix, YouTube, Disney+, HBO Max, Amazon Prime Video – all are readily available. Only those very attached to more closed ecosystems, such as Apple Music, will feel the gaps. A significant advantage is the built-in voice assistant – it works quickly, understands natural commands, and allows for convenient control of the TV: from switching channels to opening applications, to searching for content or checking the weather. It is in this aspect that the TCL C9K shows that a smart TV is more than just a "TV with the internet" – it is a tool that truly simplifies daily use of the device.

GoogleTV on OLED820

Philips OLED820 runs on the Google TV system, which immediately places it among the televisions that truly offer freedom of use. It's a fantastic platform that needs no introduction – you'll find almost an endless number of apps, from popular VOD services to niche programs or games. Google TV also allows you to customize the home screen, tailoring content to your preferences, so the television actually "learns" your viewing style. A huge plus is also Google's voice assistant – quick, natural, and effective. It can understand even less obvious questions, and in practice, it works significantly better than many competitors. Unfortunately, there was a hiccup – the screen mirroring function simply didn’t work during testing. This can be considered a minor issue, but in 2025, things like this just shouldn't happen.

Classic Features of OLED820

When it comes to classic additions, the OLED820 doesn't strive for conservative notes. On one hand, we get a backlit remote control with a numeric keypad that is quite well organized and comfortable to use. On the other hand, you have to aim it at the screen because it operates on infrared, which is more reminiscent of equipment from a decade ago than a modern television. It also lacks a few features that are often found in competitors – there's no USB recording from tuners or a PiP mode. A nice touch among classic solutions is the mini jack analog input for headphones. This is a rarity today, and it can prove useful – whether for a senior with an additional headphone station or for someone who would like to connect older speakers.

AmbilightTV OLED820

You also can't overlook Ambilight, a feature that is a hallmark of Philips. This solution impacts not only the television's appearance but also the reception of content. The lighting system can be set in various ways, from a multicolored mode that dynamically follows the image to calmer, static backlighting. We definitely recommend the latter option because the gentle light behind the screen makes the viewed content combined with the OLED matrix look even deeper and more engaging. It's a simple yet very effective addition that has given Philips televisions character for years.

Playing files from USB

9.2/10

9.5/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
Yes
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

C9K easily handled most of the materials we uploaded to the pendrive – from MKV format films, through older AVI files, to DTS and FLAC audio tracks. The only drawback remains the lack of support for HEIC format photos from Apple devices, but this is a common issue with almost all manufacturers. The most important thing, however, is that if someone finds a lack of support for some exotic format, they can always reach for an alternative player available in the Google Play store. And this is where the advantage of the Google TV system is evident – the ease with which you can extend the capabilities of the television with additional applications.

The Philips OLED820 has a built-in file player with USB, which at first glance looks quite clunky, but in practice, it works surprisingly well. One could even say that it is one of the best built-in players available in televisions. It handles virtually every type of file: photos, videos, or music, with minor exceptions, most of which are also not supported by the competition. And if someone still feels something is missing, there is always the option to install the VLC app from the Google Play library and the problem disappears.

Apps

9.6/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Sound

7.9/10

7.7/10

  • Maximum volume
    77dB
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

The sound in the TCL C9K is handled by the same system as in the C8K model – developed together with Bang & Olufsen. It is a 4.2.2 configuration with a total power of 90 W, meaning eight speakers placed to create a fuller sense of space. And I must admit – the effect is impressive. Dialogues are clear, the high and mid tones sound pure, and the bass doesn't fade, even during louder screenings. Of course, this won't replace a dedicated soundbar or home theater system, but for built-in speakers – there is really something worth listening to.

*During tests at maximum volume, we noticed unusual behavior from the audio system. When the slider is set to 100%, the TV reaches about 76–78 dB, but you can hear that it tries to generate more power, after which the volume level is immediately corrected to the mentioned value. On the other hand, when we lower the volume to, for example, 70%, it first drops as expected but then slowly rises back to the same level of 76 dB. This effect gives the impression of an aggressive limiter that always brings the volume to one level, regardless of the position of the slider. We checked this behavior multiple times, and in every case, the result was identical – no additional "smart" volume adjustment or AI features were active during this testing.

The Philips OLED 820 features a built-in 4.1 speaker system with a total power of 70 W. At the back of the chassis, there is a subwoofer that provides quite solid and deep bass. The classic speakers responsible for the rest of the range are located at the bottom of the television, which means that the sound does not always propagate as we would like. However, the overall sound quality can be considered acceptable – series, television programs, or occasional music listening perform well, with slight bass support. This should be sufficient for daily use, although we still recommend purchasing even an inexpensive soundbar, which will significantly enhance the user experience.

Acoustic Measurements

77dBC (Max)

75dBC

81dBC (Max)

75dBC