TCL C9K vs LG QNED80A6A (IPS)

Direct comparison

C9K

Available screen sizes: 65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 43”65”86”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.7

5.9

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.4

    5.7

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    7.0

    5.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.8

    5.5

  • Gaming on console

    8.9

    6.8

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    5.0

  • Watching in bright light

    7.0

    4.7

  • Utility functions

    7.7

    6.8

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    7.9

    6.0

Advantages

  • Very good contrast and black

  • Very high brightness

  • Support for all HDR formats including Dolby Vision

  • Fast 144Hz panel - for gaming and sports fans

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, low input lag, etc.

  • GoogleTV operating system with a wide range of applications

  • Great sound branded by Bang & Olufsen

  • Improved viewing angles thanks to WHVA panel

  • Wide viewing angles – the image looks just as good from any spot on the couch

  • Rich and vibrant colors thanks to the PFS filter (QNED)

  • Smooth and modern WebOS 25 system

  • Magic remote (with cursor)

  • Good detail reproduction in HDR

  • Effective upscaling and tone transition smoothing function

  • Low input lag

  • Decent features for gamers (VRR, ALLM, HGiG), despite the 60Hz panel

  • Smooth tone transitions – no visible "banding" in color gradients

Disadvantages

No like
  • Local dimming needs improvement

  • Only 2 HDMI 2.1 ports

  • No recording function from built-in tuners and no PiP

  • No smaller variants, e.g., 55"

  • Poor contrast and grayish black – the IPS panel does not perform well in low light

  • Problematic local dimming – vertical backlight bands are highly visible on a dark background

  • 60Hz panel

  • No Dolby Vision support

  • Sound lacking depth – a soundbar is recommended

Our verdict

The TCL C9K is a television that on paper looks like a show of strength from the manufacturer – thousands of Mini-LED zones, WHVA panel, audio system from Bang & Olufsen, full support for HDR formats, gaming at 144 Hz, and even 288 Hz at lower resolutions. It’s clear that TCL wanted to throw in absolutely everything they had best. And indeed – in many aspects, the C9K can impress. The brightness is enormous, HDR in large scenes can be breathtaking, motion smoothness and gaming capabilities are at a top level, and the sound – considering it’s built into the television – sounds really good. This is a device that can easily be seen as a home entertainment center. But there is also another side to the coin. Brightness management simply falters despite the amazing technical specifications – smaller details often get lost in the shadows or are blown out. And although synthetic tests of contrast or brightness perform exceptionally well, in everyday viewing of movies and series, the effect is no longer so impressive.

To summarize briefly: the C9K is a television full of contrasts – literally and figuratively. It can provide experiences close to top screens, but it's still evident that TCL needs to work on the software and optimization. If someone is looking for a screen for gaming, sports, or spectacular blockbusters – they will be delighted. However, if one expects perfect reproduction of the director's vision and thinks they have managed to buy an absolutely top model at half the price of the competition, unfortunately, they will be disappointed. It's a pity, because the technological potential here is truly vast – it just lacked a bit of common sense in its utilization.

The QNED80A variant based on IPS technology targets a completely different audience. If you are looking for a television for a space where life buzzes all day, and family members watch TV from different spots, this will be a good choice. Wide viewing angles and saturated colors ensure that the picture looks good regardless of whether we are sitting directly in front or at the dining table. Of course, it is not perfect equipment, as there simply aren't any in this price range. The IPS panel won't provide you with jet black, so evening horror movie sessions may appear slightly gray, and edge dimming in dark scenes can create visible light stripes. Despite these shortcomings, the QNED80A makes up for it with an overall good picture quality. The processor's performance deserves immense praise – both scaling regular TV to 4K and presenting details in HDR content are outstanding here. The picture is clean, sharp, and rich in detail, even if the screen itself doesn't break brightness records. Combined with the superb WebOS system, which operates quickly and stably, this is a very safe, solid choice for everyday family entertainment at a relatively low price.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Good
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Silver
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

8.1/10

2.7/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 3024 (42 x 72)

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 6 (1 x 6)

Contrast:

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

459,000:1

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

72,750:1

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

30,350:1

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

9,800:1

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

12,200:1

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

2,400:1

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,350:1

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

2,450:1

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,200:1

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,150:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

What immediately distinguishes the C9K from the C8K model is the number of local dimming zones. In the 65-inch version, we counted… over 3000! One must admit – this is a true showcase of TCL's strength, cramming literally everything they had into this television. On paper, it makes a huge impression and indeed – in less demanding film scenes, the blacks look fantastic. The level is absolutely top-notch, and the separation of lights from dark parts of the image can be breathtaking. The problem is that this impressive specification does not always translate into practice. In our tests, we noticed situations where the C9K, despite having a greater number of zones, stumbled into contrast traps and performed… worse than the C8K. For instance, it cannot perfectly dim the true black bars in 21:9 format films (those with black bars on the top and bottom). Sounds strange? Unfortunately, this is the result of a lack of optimization – the hardware is "packed" with technology, but the algorithms do not always keep up with utilizing that potential.

Don't get us wrong – black is a strong point of the C9K and in many scenes, it simply looks fantastic. In synthetic measurements, the contrast is outstanding, coming close to the level of the best TVs on the market. But in real cinema usage, those numbers do not always correspond to a better experience than in its cheaper cousin. And that is probably the biggest disappointment – because the potential was enormous.

If you come across a model equipped with an IPS panel, the situation changes drastically and we won't beat around the bush – the contrast is simply weak. This is a natural feature of this technology, which pales in comparison to VA panels. Black, especially during evening screenings in the dark, is rarely jet black – more often, it leans towards shades of dark gray or navy blue. However, the real problem with this variant is the way the local dimming system operates. Since we are dealing with edge-lit backlighting on a panel that naturally "lets" through more light, this system often does more harm than good. When a bright object appears on a dark background, the TV tries to illuminate it by activating the appropriate zone. The effect? Instead of pinpoint light, we see illuminated vertical bands stretching across the entire screen. Unfortunately, this looks worse than in the VA version. Due to the lower native contrast of the panel, these "light bands" (so-called blooming) are much more visible and stand out more from the background. In many cases, these jumps in brightness are so aggressive that instead of enjoying the show, we focus on the backlighting work.

HDR effect quality

6.9/10

4.8/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
HDR10, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 96.5%, Bt.2020: 80.5%
DCI P3: 91.3%, Bt.2020: 66.5%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

1425 nit

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

531 nit

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

1277 nit

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

331 nit

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

1424 nit

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

369 nit

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

325 nit

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

434 nit

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

342 nit

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

318 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

LG QNED80A6A (IPS)

TCL C9K

As we mentioned with black and contrast – the C9K can make a huge impression in synthetic tests. Our measurements showed that on a screen 10% filled with white, the television is capable of squeezing out… 4000 nits of brightness! It sounds astronomical, but – and here, unfortunately, the pattern repeats – the numbers say one thing, and practice says another. In real movie scenes, the situation looks different. At best, when the light effects occupy a large part of the image and the local dimming algorithm does not have to think too hard about what to do with thousands of zones – the effect is really good. At that point, the C9K can reach around 1500 nits, which provides a pleasant, intense flash and can indeed make a positive impression.

The problem starts with smaller elements – such as stars in the sky, the moon, or single reflections. That’s when the proverbial cat comes out of the bag: the algorithms are not yet refined, and brightness drops to even 400–500 nits. That’s a huge difference compared to the potential 4000 nits we saw in laboratory tests. Why does this happen? Most likely, the television is trying to protect the blacks in this way and minimize the halo effect around bright objects. Unfortunately, this comes at the cost of details – some details simply vanish, and the scene loses its nature.

When it comes to image dynamics and brightness, the QNED80A has its feet firmly on the ground. It is not a "light beast" – during our measurements, peak brightness oscillated around 350-400 nits. To put it plainly: these are values that will not allow HDR formats to fully spread their wings. So don’t expect the glare of the sun or car headlights in movies to blind you. However, this TV has a powerful ace up its sleeve that saves the overall view of the image – it is the colors. LG engineers have implemented an advanced filtration system here (technically likely based on a PFS phosphor, marketed as QNED/NanoCell), which does a fantastic job. Thanks to it, despite the average brightness, the screen can generate exceptionally saturated and pure colors. Our instruments showed coverage of the wide DCI-P3 cinema palette at the level of 93-94%. This result outclasses most standard LCD TVs. In practice, this means that when watching 4K HDR content, the image – while not particularly bright – is very plastic, vibrant, and pleases the eye with the depth of colors.

Factory color reproduction

4.5/10

4.4/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

For color tests, as always, we reached for the Filmmaker mode – a new feature in TCL TVs for 2025. And while the direction itself is a step in the right direction, the execution leaves much to be desired. The white balance in SDR content turned out to be too warm – there was an excess of red. On the other hand, in HDR, it went in the opposite direction: the image became excessively blue. The Colour Checker test revealed quite a few color errors that were noticeable to the naked eye. An even bigger problem turned out to be what we mentioned above – brightness management. Regardless of whether we were watching SDR or HDR content, the image tended to blow out the entire scene, giving it an unnatural, even grotesque character. It's hard to call this a "director-created" mode – because the director has certainly never seen such an image.

Here, regardless of whether you encounter the VA or IPS version, the situation looks identical. LG engineers once again served us their vision of a "gaming look," which unfortunately has little to do with accuracy. After switching to console, the white balance automatically drifts into very cold areas. The image is dominated by the color blue, making it seem artificially sharpened, and the white is so aggressive that it is almost burned out. This creates an effect that we associate with bright retail modes – everything is supposed to shine and scream "I am digital." While some may like this, we must say it straight: this is not an accurate image. If you care about naturalness, we suggest checking the settings right away and changing the color temperature to a warmer one.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

7.4/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, we finally managed to tame the white balance – and it immediately translated into a more natural image. Colors finally started to look the way they should, and the overall presentation was incomparably better than in the factory settings. In other words – it’s worth taking a moment to improve this, as the gain is truly significant. The gamma responsible for managing brightness was also brought into order in SDR content, and the effect was more than satisfying. Unfortunately, when we turned on HDR materials, the situation quickly became complicated. No matter how we set the local dimming, the television had a tendency to do what it liked with the image – either it overexposed everything or dimmed the darkest parts too much. Exactly as we saw in the scene from the movie Billy Lynn. So, the color improvement after calibration makes a great impression, but brightness management in HDR remains the Achilles' heel of C9K and presents a certain technological limitation.

After professional calibration, the QNED80A in the IPS version has changed beyond recognition, especially in "regular" content (SDR). We managed to eliminate the greenish tint and calm down the overly bright gamma. In classic television or older games, color errors (DeltaE) fell below the threshold of perceptibility (value < 2). The image is now consistent, natural, and truly pleasing to the eye. The situation is somewhat more complicated in HDR mode. Although the colors are already in place, the television has trouble perfectly controlling the brightness (EOTF curve). Due to the limitations of edge lighting and the rather poor adjustment options provided by LG in this area, the television's software sometimes "does what it wants" just to mask the imperfections of black and contrast. However, this is not a cause for concern – despite these technical limitations, the image after calibration is a class better than what you saw out of the box.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.7/10

9.2/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

In terms of the smoothness of tonal transitions, TCL C9K performs really well. In more challenging movie scenes, there is no typical color banding that can break immersion even in more expensive TVs. Perhaps slight issues can be noticed in the brightest parts – for example, in scenes from the movie Kingstone – but these are nuances. For the vast majority of viewers, especially with 4K content, color grading will look smooth and practically unnoticeable.

Another very strong point of this model is the way it handles tonal transitions. Often in cheaper LCD constructions, we see what's called banding – a situation where the television cannot smoothly display a gradient, creating visible "steps" between shades. In the case of the QNED80A, the engineers have done their homework. Whether we are watching a blue sky, fog, or dark scenes full of gray, the transitions between colors are incredibly smooth and soft. There are no artificial cuts or jagged color edges. As a result, the image is very cohesive and natural, which is not a standard in this price segment.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5.5/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Digital image processing in TCL C9K is quite mediocre. The tonal smoothing feature seems to be present, but turning it on practically changes nothing – color bands are still visible, and it can unintentionally highlight elements we would prefer to hide, such as textures of objects. Fortunately, it doesn’t remove film grain, but that’s small comfort since the effects are still poor. Therefore, it's hard to recommend using this option.

On the other hand, image scaling performs much better. Lower quality materials look quite decent – characters and backgrounds are presented clearly, although, of course, with sources at 576p, physics cannot be fooled. Sometimes, characteristic aliasing on objects appears, but that’s the fault of the source itself, not the algorithm. A plus for not having issues with overscan – the image is not artificially cropped or enlarged.

It often happens that cheap 4K TVs mercilessly expose the flaws of low-resolution materials. Here, it's different. The QNED80A is great equipment for watching content that isn't perfect. The processor does a great job of upscaling the image, making even older recordings look quite decent on a 4K screen – they are consistent and free of digital noise. An interesting feature is the gradation reduction available in the settings. It is quite effective in combating so-called banding (color banding) in low-bitrate materials. Of course, one should approach it with some caution. Due to the lower computing power of the chip (compared to the premium series), enabling this option can sometimes result in unwanted artifacts or blurriness. Despite this risk, we encourage experimentation, as in many cases this feature can save a poor-quality viewing experience.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.8/10

4.6/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
No
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
No
Brightness drop with BFI
51%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur (1080p@288Hz):

Blur ():

Like the C8K, the C9K is also a really fast television – both figuratively and literally. It features a 4K panel with a refresh rate of 144 Hz, and at lower resolutions, the display can even ramp up to 288 Hz. This speed translates into practice – when watching sports or playing games, the image looks very smooth and clear. Additionally, in films, we get an extra motion smoother called Motion Clarity, which allows us to adjust the fluidity to our own preferences – from the cinematic "judder" frame to almost theatrical smoothness.

In terms of motion reproduction, the QNED80A unfortunately has a tough time. The television is based on a 60Hz refresh rate panel, which in 2025 in the QNED series is quite a disappointment. If you are looking for perfect sharpness in dynamic soccer matches, you might feel a bit unsatisfied. A solution in this situation is the TruMotion system. It allows for artificially adding frames, which smooths out the image in movies and series. In the menu, you will find the De-Judder slider – we recommend setting it to a value of 2, 3, or 4. This is the "golden mean" that improves fluidity without turning the film into a soap opera.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 288Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

For gaming, the TCL C9K is a complete tool. Here we have two (out of four) HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gbps, so all key technologies work: VRR (variable refresh rate) and ALLM (automatic low latency mode). Additionally, the manufacturer added a really intuitive Game Bar, which allows you to quickly preview the most important parameters and adjust settings without digging through the menu. Also, TCL's policy is a plus – the TV is not afraid of any HDR formats, even in game mode. Whether it's HGiG or Dolby Vision for the Xbox Series S/X console – everything works as it should, giving the player wide freedom.

In the gaming section, we won't sugarcoat it for you – the QNED80A is not e-sports equipment. The lack of support for 120Hz signal is a fact that must be accepted. However, LG engineers have done everything to squeeze the maximum potential out of this 60 Hz panel, providing gamers with a set of desired features. First and foremost, the television supports VRR (in the range of 48-60Hz) and ALLM. This means that the image is smooth, does not stutter, and the television automatically switches to low latency mode as soon as we pick up the controller. Accessing these options is incredibly simple thanks to the dedicated system overlay – Game Dashboard. It is also worth appreciating the support for the HGiG format. This is a nod to owners of modern consoles. Although the screen does not support gaming Dolby Vision, HGiG ensures that the television "understands" how to display games in HDR. This helps us avoid the issue of blown-out clouds, which is unfortunately a plague on cheaper LCD televisions.

Input lag

9.8/10

9.8/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
15 ms
1080p120
7 ms
2160p60
16 ms
15 ms
2160p120
7 ms

HDR

2160p60
16 ms
15 ms
2160p120
7 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
16 ms
2160p120 DV
7 ms

In terms of input lag, the TCL C9K performs exceptionally well. With 120 Hz content, the lag is just 7 ms, placing it among the very best TVs available on the market. Naturally, with 60 Hz materials, the input lag rises to about 15-16 ms, but in practice, this has little impact on the final responsiveness of the screen to our actions on the pad.

What about responsiveness? Our measurements showed an input lag of about 15 ms. In the gaming world, where top monitors go down to 1 ms, this might seem like an average result, but in the category of living room TVs, it is a very good result. In practice, this means that when playing on a console, you will not feel any discomfort. There's no situation here where the character reacts with a noticeable delay after pressing a button on the controller. The TV responds to the controller without delay, allowing you to enjoy the gameplay without unnecessary irritation. For recreational gaming after work – the result is quite acceptable.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

5/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Average
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
7ms
15ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RGB
RGB
Max refresh rate
144Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

In terms of office work, the TCL C9K does not disappoint – thanks to the support for 4:4:4 chroma, the readability of fonts is at a good level, so writing or working with documents should not pose a problem. One could indeed notice slight issues with dimming horizontal lines, but in everyday use, it’s hard to call that a real flaw. However, the C9K reveals its greatest potential in PC gaming. Here, the television showcases its full capabilities – it can switch to lower resolutions, such as Full HD, and display images at up to 288 Hz. Additionally, it supports both G-Sync and FreeSync, so image synchronization with the graphics card works flawlessly. It’s hard to have any major complaints about this set – it’s truly a top-tier screen for computer gaming.

In terms of cooperation with a PC, we have another surprise in store. Theoretically, it is IPS matrices that, due to their pixel structure, should dominate in displaying static office content. Meanwhile, the QNED80A breaks the mold once again. During testing, we noticed strange behavior when displaying text. While classic, bold fonts are readable and look correct, the trouble begins with small, thin letters. They tend to "split" along the contours and cast a strange shadow. This causes fine text to become less clear, and prolonged reading can be tiring for the eyes. So, if you are looking for a TV that will mainly serve to display Excel tables or Word documents, this particular variant may disappoint you a bit.

Viewing angles

4.5/10

6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
75%
69%

A new feature in TCL televisions for 2025 is the WHVA panel, which is designed to provide better viewing angles than standard VA panels. And indeed, there is noticeable progress. When viewing the screen from the side, the image is clearer and colors do not degrade as quickly as in previous models. However, this does not mean that we are dealing with the level of top coatings or solutions known from IPS panels, and certainly not from OLEDs. The image remains readable, but brightness clearly decreases. This is definitely a step forward compared to earlier TCL models, but it is not yet a complete revolution.

Do you remember how we complained about the weaker contrast? Now it's time for a comeback. It is in terms of viewing angles that the IPS matrix shows its superiority and reason for existence. If you have a spacious living room and family members watch television from different spots – for example, from an armchair in the corner or over the dining table – this variant will be a home run. Unlike VA panels, here the image retains its properties even at a large angle. Colors remain vibrant and do not change hues when viewed from the side. This makes the QNED80A in this version a great choice for watching games with friends or cartoons with kids, where not everyone has the luxury of sitting perfectly in front of the screen.

Daytime performance

7/10

4.7/10

Panel finish
Glare
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Panel brightness

LG QNED80A6A (IPS): 310 cd/m2

TCL C9K: 642 cd/m2

The new WHVA matrix coating has its strengths and weaknesses. On one hand, it manages quite well with minor reflections; on the other hand, with stronger light sources, it is evident that the reflection suppression is not at the highest level. Fortunately, the coating does not spoil what is most important: the blacks and color saturation. This is a definite plus, as in many competing models, the compromises in this area are more painful. Additionally, there is very high brightness – in SDR content, the C9K can achieve an average of 650 nits in SDR materials. This result is easily sufficient for watching television or movies in more challenging lighting conditions, even on sunny days.

QNED80A is not a "light monster," so in full, direct sunlight, the image may appear a bit washed out. It is not equipment dedicated to combating sharp sunlight hitting directly on the screen. However, it has an ace up its sleeve that significantly improves user comfort: the panel coating. Instead of a cheap, glossy finish, LG has used a satin texture here. It works very effectively, "softening" reflections from the surroundings. So we don't see our perfect reflection in the screen like in a mirror, which can be incredibly irritating in darker scenes. So it might be insufficient for extremely bright rooms, but in standard, moderate home conditions, the QNED80A will perform perfectly.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
Mini-LED PFS LED
Software version during testing
V8-0012T01-LF1V538.002459
33.21.62
Image processor
MT5896 2,5 GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review TCL C9K TV Panel details
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV Panel details

TCL C9K

LG QNED80A6A (IPS)

TV features

7.7/10

6.8/10

  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review TCL C9K TV features
Review TCL C9K TV features
Review TCL C9K TV features
Review TCL C9K TV features
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV features
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV features
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV features
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV features

Classic TV Features

In terms of basic TV features, the TCL C9K does not disappoint – it has everything that most users expect. The EPG guide works smoothly, teletext is available, and pairing Bluetooth headphones, a mouse, or a keyboard is straightforward. However, it should be noted that in the Google TV system – just like in other TCL models – there are no more advanced options, such as recording programs or picture-in-picture (PiP) mode. Some may find this lacking, especially if they have used such features with competitors. It's also worth mentioning that we only have one USB port available – enough to connect a drive with movies or a flash drive, but if someone plans to use multiple devices, they might find this insufficient.

Smart Features

While the TCL C9K does not stand out in terms of classic solutions, it showcases its full potential in the realm of smart features. The Google TV system is currently the most popular platform, and it's easy to see why – the library of applications is vast. Netflix, YouTube, Disney+, HBO Max, Amazon Prime Video – all are readily available. Only those very attached to more closed ecosystems, such as Apple Music, will feel the gaps. A significant advantage is the built-in voice assistant – it works quickly, understands natural commands, and allows for convenient control of the TV: from switching channels to opening applications, to searching for content or checking the weather. It is in this aspect that the TCL C9K shows that a smart TV is more than just a "TV with the internet" – it is a tool that truly simplifies daily use of the device.

WebOS Platform and Support

One of the biggest advantages of the QNED80A model is its "brain," meaning the operating system. LG has implemented a full-fledged WebOS for the year 2025, which in terms of smoothness and usability is on par with more expensive models. Applications launch smoothly, and navigating the menu is a pure pleasure. All this is thanks to the unique remote control with a pointer function (cursor), which underwent a visual overhaul this year. The manufacturer opted for minimalism—the new "Magic" is significantly smaller and more ergonomic. It fits perfectly in hand, but this change also has a downside. The physical number pad has disappeared from the casing. For the younger generations, who are accustomed to streaming, this is not an issue, but older family members who are used to entering channel numbers from memory will have to change their habits.

Everyday Use and Add-ons

In terms of functions that we would call "classic," the QNED80A sticks to a proven standard. It is not a multimedia powerhouse that will surprise you with exotic features, but it performs flawlessly in everyday television craftsmanship. The operation of classic television, including Teletext, is correct and problem-free. Wireless communication also deserves praise—the Bluetooth module works reliably, allowing for quick connections to a game console controller or wireless speakers. This is a TV that simply "works"—steadily, predictably, and without unnecessary complications.

Apps

9.6/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.2/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
Yes
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

C9K easily handled most of the materials we uploaded to the pendrive – from MKV format films, through older AVI files, to DTS and FLAC audio tracks. The only drawback remains the lack of support for HEIC format photos from Apple devices, but this is a common issue with almost all manufacturers. The most important thing, however, is that if someone finds a lack of support for some exotic format, they can always reach for an alternative player available in the Google Play store. And this is where the advantage of the Google TV system is evident – the ease with which you can extend the capabilities of the television with additional applications.

Many of us still enjoy watching movies or photos from our own USB drives. Here, the QNED80A performs quite decently, supporting a wide range of video and audio codecs. Most movie libraries will start "right off the bat." However, it is important to remember the specifics of the WebOS system. Since it is a closed environment, we are stuck with what the manufacturer has prepared for us – there is no option to install alternative players (e.g., the popular VLC) if we encounter a read error. What kind of errors might we encounter? First and foremost, the lack of support for HEIC files. So, if you take pictures with your iPhone and want to display them on a large screen straight from the flash drive – the TV won't see them. It's worth changing the photo save format on your phone to JPG right away. We also noticed that the player has difficulties processing very large graphic files. Photos with resolutions around 20-28 Mpix might not load or could cause errors. Aside from these exceptions – the playback is trouble-free.

Sound

7.9/10

6/10

  • Maximum volume
    77dB
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The sound in the TCL C9K is handled by the same system as in the C8K model – developed together with Bang & Olufsen. It is a 4.2.2 configuration with a total power of 90 W, meaning eight speakers placed to create a fuller sense of space. And I must admit – the effect is impressive. Dialogues are clear, the high and mid tones sound pure, and the bass doesn't fade, even during louder screenings. Of course, this won't replace a dedicated soundbar or home theater system, but for built-in speakers – there is really something worth listening to.

*During tests at maximum volume, we noticed unusual behavior from the audio system. When the slider is set to 100%, the TV reaches about 76–78 dB, but you can hear that it tries to generate more power, after which the volume level is immediately corrected to the mentioned value. On the other hand, when we lower the volume to, for example, 70%, it first drops as expected but then slowly rises back to the same level of 76 dB. This effect gives the impression of an aggressive limiter that always brings the volume to one level, regardless of the position of the slider. We checked this behavior multiple times, and in every case, the result was identical – no additional "smart" volume adjustment or AI features were active during this testing.

When it comes to sound, the QNED80A fits into the market standard for the mid-range. Here we have a classic 2.0 setup with a power of 20 watts. We won't hide it – you can't fool physics. The sound lacks low tones (bass) and that specific depth that builds the atmosphere in action movies or while listening to music. However, the TV has one significant advantage that users of traditional television, such as series and news programs, will appreciate. It's the reproduction of speech. Dialogues are surprisingly clear and natural. The sound is not "bass-heavy" or artificially boosted, which prevents ear fatigue and allows understanding every word of the narrator without the need to increase the volume.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

77dBC (Max)

75dBC

No acoustic data