TCL C8L / QM8L vs Samsung S90H (WOLED)

Direct comparison

C8L / QM8L

Info

S90H / S92H / HAE / HAT

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”98”

Available screen sizes: 42”48”55”65”83”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

8.3

8.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.7

    8.6

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    7.5

    8.8

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    7.2

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    8.9

    9.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    10.0

    6.5

  • Utility functions

    8.3

    7.3

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.3

  • Sound quality

    8.1

    8.4

Advantages

  • Very deep blacks, Mini-LED backlighting

  • High peak brightness, results reaching nearly 5,000 nits

  • Excellent daytime performance, the powerful backlight easily cuts through reflections on the panel

  • Very good colors, new SQD quantum dots

  • Pentonic 800 processor, a noticeable quality jump in upscaling and the performance of digital features

  • Four full HDMI 2.1 ports

  • Great specs for gamers, extremely low input lag (below 10 ms), up to 288 Hz refresh with VRR, and support for HGiG and Dolby Vision Gaming

  • Google TV, the system runs fast and allows installation of a large number of apps

  • Good sound, audio branded by premium Bang & Olufsen

  • Perfect black and infinite contrast (OLED)

  • Very high HDR brightness (up to 1400 nits)

  • Effective anti-reflective coating (matte, glare-free)

  • Exemplary color reproduction after calibration

  • Excellent motion handling (no motion blur)

  • Outstanding for gamers (4x HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, low input lag)

  • Game Motion Plus feature

  • Refresh rate up to 165 Hz

  • Wide viewing angles

  • Fast, fully featured Tizen

  • Good sound

Disadvantages

No like
  • Lack of creative fidelity: the TV tends to boost brightness.

  • Slight ghosting

  • In bright light colors lose some depth (a trait of matte coatings)

  • Lacks TV features such as USB recording or PIP

  • No support for DTS:X (an issue for Blu-ray disc fans)

  • Limited color saturation compared to the QD-OLED variant

Our verdict

TCL C8L is undoubtedly one of the most intriguing Mini-LED TVs to come into our lab this year. This model stands out primarily due to its excellent price-to-capability ratio. TCL has accustomed us to aggressive pricing of its screens, but in the case of the C8 series, the manufacturer has managed to push the boundaries even further. For the amount that often allows just the purchase of mid-range models or two models like the C8K with market competitors, here we receive features and specifications equal to those of top models. A new image processor, four full HDMI 2.1 ports, support for extreme refresh rates, and impressive peak brightness thanks to a massive number of dimming zones are arguments that are hard to overlook.

However, analyzing the whole picture, we must honestly summarize the character of this TV. The C8L is a device created more for displaying "impressive" images rather than rigorously faithful ones. What do we mean by that? The software and algorithms managing the Mini-LED backlight zones have been tuned to prioritize spectacle – the image is meant to be bright, contrasty, and strikingly saturated. And what does this mean? The TV tends to interpret images autonomously rather than adhering to certain studio standards. For most users looking for "greater" emotions in movies or games, this effect will likely be an advantage. On the other hand, purists and fans of perfectly natural images (like us 😉) may consider this behavior too aggressive and not in line with the director's intent. Therefore, we leave the final assessment on this issue to you.

Overall, despite this specificity, the TCL C8L is a TV that we can, and indeed must, recommend wholeheartedly. It is primarily a premium-class product that does literally everything correctly... to the point of being painful. We would regard certain imperfections simply as characteristics of this device rather than flaws – mainly due to the technological limitations that all Mini-LED TVs from every manufacturer on the market have accustomed us to. Ultimately, the software refinement has given the new eight a great deal, making it a mature, confident, and nearly complete device.

Samsung S90H is a TV that simply makes a spectacular impression. The combination of OLED's absolute blacks, high brightness, and excellent motion sharpness delivers a picture that's hard to look away from. And that's exactly what we expect from a good OLED TV. The matte anti-reflective coating also works very well. Reflections on a sunny day stop being a major problem, and thanks to the presence of a traditional polarizer black doesn't shift as much toward grayish-burgundy tones as with the QD-OLED variant. Add to that the blazing-fast Tizen, an excellent set of gaming features led by Game Motion Plus, and surprisingly good, full-bodied sound from the built-in speakers. Any weaknesses? Of course. Tone transitions aren't quite as perfect as on QD-OLED, and viewing angles remain slightly worse. In practice, though, these are mostly minor quibbles, especially since WOLED also has its own advantages, particularly in a bright room, where it preserves black levels and color saturation better. Overall, the QD-OLED variant still comes out slightly ahead, but this time the difference isn't as pronounced as it was a year ago. For most people that won't be the deciding factor when choosing a TV. So our advice is: rather than obsessing over the panel type, pick the size that best fits the room. Whether you buy the WOLED or QD-OLED version, you'll get a mature, versatile, and well-balanced TV. As every year, the S90H series has a guaranteed place among the most cost-effective OLEDs of 2026.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Premium
Stand type
Central
Central
Bezel color
Silver
Graphite
Stand
Height adjustment
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

8/10

10/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 2040 (34 x 60)

Contrast:

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Contrast and black detail

Result

156,600:1

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Contrast and black detail

Result

59,250:1

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Contrast and black detail

Result

17,400:1

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Contrast and black detail

Result

23,650:1

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Contrast and black detail

Result

9,250:1

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The C8L model cannot be denied one thing: impressive specifications. In the 65-inch variant we tested, the manufacturer packed in as many as 2040 independent local dimming zones (this number obviously increases or decreases with the screen size). Such a dense packing of light points has a direct impact on black depth. The contrast we measured in movie scenes reached impressive five- and six-digit values to one, which is a remarkable result in the LCD world. Is the algorithm perfect? Not entirely. On small, bright elements displayed on a dark background, the trained eye can still notice a slight halo effect and moments when zones come to life, which is a natural feature of Mini-LED technology. Interestingly, in our test scene with the helicopter, the background was noticeably brighter than on competing screens. Unfortunately, TCL has a specific way of manipulating the brightness curve, artificially boosting some scenes, which we do not have full control over from the device menu. This is an evident issue with this model that needs to be taken into account. That said, the black level on this model will be more than satisfactory for most viewers.

Because the Samsung S90H uses an organic display, it deserves the highest possible rating for contrast and blacks. This, of course, applies to both market variants: the WOLED version we tested and the QD-OLED variant. Because each pixel is an independent light source and can turn completely off, the TV delivers absolutely perfect blacks and infinite contrast. In practice, this translates into stunning image depth and perfectly sharp separation of bright details from dark backgrounds. Any haloing effect (blooming), which even top LCD TVs with Mini LED backlighting still struggle with today, is out of the question here. You'll appreciate the true magic of the WOLED panel especially during evening viewing in a darkened room; dark parts of scenes gain a remarkable sense of plasticity, incredible three-dimensionality, and a wealth of details hidden in the shadows.

HDR effect quality

7.3/10

7.7/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 97.4%, Bt.2020: 90.3%
DCI P3: 99.4%, Bt.2020: 75.9%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Brightness measurement

Result

1637 nit

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Brightness measurement

Result

701 nit

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Brightness measurement

Result

1428 nit

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Brightness measurement

Result

405 nit

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Brightness measurement

Result

1728 nit

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1374 nit

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1419 nit

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1570 nit

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1395 nit

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

713 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung S90H (WOLED)

TCL C8L / QM8L

Luminance of RGB colors

In terms of HDR, the TCL C8L turns out to be a hellishly bright television – and I mean literally. On a synthetic chart of 5%, our measuring equipment indicated a result exceeding 4500 nits. This is a result that is downright cosmic, considering that reference director monitors, which we often refer to in our materials, typically operate around 4000 nits. Does this mean that the C8L breaks barriers and climbs to the technological peak of Mini-LED? Not exactly. Dry synthetic tests are one thing, and real movie images are another. In real, varied scenes, the C8L achieves a peak of around 1600 nits. This is still a very good result, ensuring a very high level of HDR dynamics, but also clearly lower than what the manufacturer boasts in the specifications. The trouble starts with very small flashes of light – then brightness can drastically drop to around 600 nits. The algorithm tries at all costs to maintain deep black and minimize halo effect, but it does so at the expense of HDR impact. This is perfect evidence that laboratory charts rarely correspond to what we ultimately see on the screen.

Huge applause is due for color reproduction, all thanks to the new generation of SQD (Super Quantum Dot) quantum dots. The coverage of the DCI-P3 palette reaches 97%, but the true jaw-dropper is the measurement of the extremely demanding BT.2020 space. The C8L achieves as much as 90% in it, placing it alongside today's top screens that boast RGB backlighting. Importantly, unlike some screens with Micro/Mini RGB backlighting, this effect is stable regardless of the scene displayed. Of course, one must remember that content mastered for such a wide gamut in films or series is still a rarity. However, the mere fact that the panel has such a "color reserve" deserves immense admiration.

The Samsung S90H in the WOLED variant is still an exceptionally bright TV for its price class, although it is slightly dimmer compared to the QD-OLED version. The difference is not as pronounced as in last year’s F series, where gaps could reach as much as 500 nits. Here the specs of both panels are very close, and differences in peak brightness are only about 100–150 nits. In small-area measurements, the S90H on the WOLED panel easily reaches levels close to 1500 nits. That headroom lets it portray HDR dynamics phenomenally—specular highlights, reflections or explosions have the right punch, just as the creators intended in the post-production studio. As with most OLED displays, when a very bright scene fills the entire screen, the protection systems that safeguard the panel kick in and brightness naturally falls to around 700 nits. It’s worth stressing that this is still an excellent result on the market, often noticeably better than many Mini LED screens in the same segment.

Color gamut coverage

The biggest difference between the two S90H variants lies in color reproduction and saturation. This stems directly from the different construction of the WOLED panel, which uses an additional white subpixel. As a result, colors at very high brightness don’t achieve quite the same intensity, and the volume of the wide color gamut is somewhat more limited than with QD-OLED. That said, in everyday use these differences will be hard for most viewers to notice. Our measured DCI-P3 coverage on the WOLED panel reaches nearly 99%, which means that in the vast majority of real film scenes both variants will deliver almost identical images. The true gap only appears in rarer, particularly demanding productions that use the ultra-wide BT.2020 gamut. Due to the WOLED panel’s design, coverage of that standard is about 15% lower compared to the S90HAT with a QD-OLED panel, so the brightest, heavily illuminated HDR colors may appear a bit less vivid.

Factory color reproduction

5.3/10

7.6/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the TCL C8L in the best factory picture mode available in this TV’s menu for image fidelity. That, of course, is Filmmaker Mode, which appeared in this brand’s software relatively recently (a year ago in the "K" series). Thanks to it, an average user can get a pretty good color reproduction straight out of the box, although it is certainly not a perfectly tuned mode. Looking at the factory white balance of our unit, both in SDR and HDR material, the red component was clearly lacking, which made the image noticeably cooler and caused a slight shift toward bluish-green tints. The issue of brightness management is also ambiguous, as we mentioned earlier. While for SDR content the gamma linearity is actually correct and holds steadily at the reference value of 2.4, in HDR things look much worse. Tracking the EOTF curve clearly shows the TV has a significantly boosted brightness across the range, which can make the final image overly bright and inconsistent with the creators’ intent, and that in a mode that by definition should avoid that. Of course, like every sample in our lab, this one also underwent professional calibration, and its results are shown below.

In Filmmaker mode, which we strongly recommend enabling right out of the box, the S90H offers very good factory color tuning. Colors are natural and faithful to the filmmakers' intent, without the intrusive oversaturation found in more aggressive profiles. However, as is usually the case without full calibration, there can be unit-to-unit variation. In our test the white balance lacked a bit of the blue component, causing the image to lean slightly toward warmer, yellowish tones. This was most noticeable in bright scenes, such as the snowy sequences from Star Wars. Additionally, the gamma curve ran slightly low, around 2.2, which resulted in a slight boost to shadow detail. In HDR mode the tuning was a bit better, showing only a slight undersaturation in the red region.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.5/10

9.2/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

As you can see, the results of a professional calibration of the TCL C8L are really promising, thanks to the extensive adjustment tools the manufacturer put at our disposal in the menu. Above all, we were able to completely correct the white balance — we eliminated the red deficiency, so the image finally stopped drifting toward unwanted cool tones. After that adjustment, errors in the ColorChecker test fell to near-reference levels, regularly landing below a Delta E of 2, which is below the threshold of human perception.

If the test patterns look this perfect, you might ask: why then the lower final score in this category? The answer lies in the brightness management discussed earlier. Although the menu includes sliders that let you precisely straighten the EOTF curve on synthetic signals, when confronted with actual movie material (I recommend enabling the EOTF filter when watching movies), you can see that in most scenarios the TV still reacts to HDR metadata its own way. As a result, the picture can be slightly over-brightened and not faithful to the creators' intent, and it was precisely this lack of consistency with real films that cost the C8L a few points.

After full calibration it can safely be said that the S90H in the WOLED version looks almost perfect. In SDR mode color reproduction errors drop to ultra-low levels, and Delta E values very rarely exceed 2. That's a phenomenal result, so if you care about perfectly faithful color reproduction it's definitely worth considering calibration. The calibrated HDR mode also performs very well, in which the white balance was stabilized and earlier deviations eliminated. After professional tuning it's really hard to find anything to criticize, because the TV delivers an image with almost exemplary naturalness and dimensionality. The slightly lower rating in this category compared with the QD-OLED variant is solely due to the previously described saturation limitation in extremely bright scenes; the tuning options and color fidelity themselves are at the highest level.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9/10

8/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The smoothness of tonal transitions on the C8L is nearly exemplary. A well-tuned panel combined with the processing algorithms means the TV handles posterization, the ugly, layered banding where individual shades separate, very well. Subtle, minimal errors and slight imperfections in gradation are noticeable only in extremely dark, demanding scenes. However, overall, when watching high-quality content at native resolution, transitions between colors are extremely smooth and natural.

The smoothness of tonal transitions is very solid here, and the WOLED panel variant has been noticeably improved compared with last year's F-series model. Annoying gradient errors and visible banding now appear much less often. Despite this clear improvement, it still does not reach the level represented by QD-OLED technology. In almost every direct comparison, the QD-OLED panel handles smooth transitions between shades a bit more precisely. In summary: regarding gradients, the WOLED panel is clearly better than in previous generations of these panels, but the QD-OLED variant still maintains a noticeable advantage in this category.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

8/10

7.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
No
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

This year the C8 series and higher models received probably the biggest and most anticipated upgrade in TCL’s history, and it specifically concerns digital image processing. The C8L is the lowest-end model in the manufacturer's lineup to be equipped with the latest flagship chip, the MediaTek Pentonic 800 (listed in the menu as MT9655). Thanks to its processing power, the feature called "Gradual Smoothing" finally works as it should. The algorithm effectively eliminates unwanted posterization (ugly tonal transitions/color banding), doing so intelligently enough that it does not degrade the sharpness of other details.

The processor also handles upscaling lower-resolution content to 4K very well. Although evaluating this element can be mostly academic, because the differences between today's TVs in this class are very subtle. The most important takeaway is that TCL finally has nothing to be ashamed of compared to the competition.

When it comes to reducing posterization, Samsung has kept the same solutions as last year’s models. The dedicated gradient-smoothing function works quite well and can effectively mask unwanted tonal transitions, which can be useful on a WOLED panel that is somewhat prone to banding. However, keep in mind it acts aggressively. This mechanism, aside from removing artifacts, can clean up fine film grain and slightly soften detail. Ultimately it’s a matter of compromise, but if you care about an absolutely faithful reproduction, it’s safer to leave this option off.

There’s also no breakthrough in scaling. The S90H uses the same NQ4 Gen3 processor as its predecessor, so the quality of upscaling was almost identical. The chip sharpens lower-resolution material very well, extracting a satisfying level of detail. Samsung still hasn’t dealt with the old overscan issue. With some older recordings or archival material the image edges can be slightly cropped. It’s a minor flaw, but it’s a shame the manufacturer still hasn’t eliminated it.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.7/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
165Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
No
Brightness drop with BFI
32%
50%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (1080p@288Hz):

Blur (4K@165Hz ):

The TCL C8L is equipped with a fast panel that has a native 144 Hz refresh rate. That spec will be most appreciated by demanding PC gamers, while most users, who rely on consoles or TV broadcasts, will use a steady 120 Hz. It is at 120 Hz that motion processing algorithms handle image rendering for movies, series, and sports. In the TV’s menu you’ll find a "Motion Clarity" option that lets you adjust the motion smoothing to your preferences. The algorithms handle cinematic material at 24 or 30 frames per second (fps) as well as dynamic sports broadcasts at 50 or 60 fps, maintaining appropriate smoothness.

In terms of motion handling, the S90H is simply excellent. This year's panel offers a refresh rate boosted to 165 Hz, though in practice the benefit will be realized mainly by gamers connecting a powerful PC. For movies, TV series, or sports broadcasts, such a high refresh rate makes no difference and the picture looks exactly the same as at the standard 120 Hz. Regardless of the source, the OLED panel's lightning-fast response time does its job, so motion is clean and the ghosting or smearing seen on LCD screens simply doesn't occur here.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

9.6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 288Hz
    48 - 165Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

For gamers – especially for those with powerful PCs and several consoles at the same time – the TCL C8L is a true beast. It’s the first model in the manufacturer’s lineup equipped with four full HDMI 2.1 ports with a maximum bandwidth of 48 Gbps. This is directly thanks to the new Pentonic 800 processor we wrote about earlier. Additionally, the TV seamlessly supports virtually every gaming feature. It has an automatic game mode (ALLM) that reduces latency to minimal levels and full frame synchronization (VRR) operating in an impressive range of up to 288 Hz. We’re also talking about standards like G-Sync or FreeSync from Nvidia and AMD. When it comes to image display standards, there are also no compromises: the C8L offers complete support for HDR formats in games, including gaming Dolby Vision and the HGiG profile. All of these features can be conveniently managed from a very readable game bar (Game Bar), which we can customize according to our preferences. From a purely gaming perspective, there really isn’t anything to complain about in the C8L – well, maybe aside from the previously mentioned slight ghosting. But other than that? It’s an unflawed machine for gamers.

Players should feel at home with the S90H, because in that respect Samsung left few reasons to complain. The TV has four HDMI 2.1 ports, each of which supports VRR, ALLM, and high refresh rates. There's also the Game Bar, a handy menu that lets you quickly check key parameters and change settings without leaving the game. Importantly, Samsung has also improved HGiG. In last year's models it could cause issues when used with a console, but in the S90H it now works as it should. What sets it apart from the competition is primarily Game Motion Plus. It's a special motion-smoothing mode designed for games, which works best with titles running at 30 or 60 frames per second. Motion becomes noticeably smoother, while latency remains at a reasonable level. In our measurements it was under 50 ms, so you can still play comfortably. That's important, because on many TVs turning on a similar smoothing mode causes such a large increase in input lag that controls start to feel noticeably sluggish. Samsung has managed to find a good compromise here. There's still no Dolby Vision Gaming, but in practice Game Motion Plus may prove to be a far more useful feature.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
14 ms
10 ms
1080p120
8 ms
6 ms
2160p60
13 ms
10 ms
2160p120
8 ms
6 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
10 ms
2160p120
8 ms
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
13 ms
2160p120 DV
8 ms

In laboratory tests we measured input lag at under 10 ms. For a gamer that means a completely imperceptible delay. Importantly, this result can be improved further by forcing the PC to use a refresh rate above 120 Hz. We also give high marks to Dolby Vision Game mode, where the lag is just as low as in standard SDR or HDR10 modes.

Input lag is another area that's really hard to fault. With a 120 Hz signal we measured only about 5/6 ms, which is truly a stellar result. After switching to even higher refresh rates the delay fell to virtually astronomically low values, practically imperceptible during gameplay. The Samsung S90H delivers absolutely top-tier results.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
7ms
6ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RGB
RWGB
Max refresh rate
144Hz
165Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

The TCL C8L is very well suited as a large-format monitor. The TV supports refresh rates up to 288 Hz at Full HD resolution, which will be appreciated by fans of esports titles and owners of less powerful graphics cards in AAA games. The TV also works seamlessly with frame-synchronization technologies AMD FreeSync and NVIDIA G-Sync. Importantly for text work, the C8L renders most fonts correctly and legibly. At very close range you can notice minimal errors in the rendering of letter edges and a slight graininess around them, but the issue disappears entirely (or rather becomes much less noticeable) once you sit at a normal, recommended viewing distance.

The S90H works great as a large-format PC monitor, and not just because of its full set of gaming features. NVIDIA G-Sync certification, low input lag, and support for refresh rates up to 165 Hz mean it pairs with typical gaming PCs without issues. In terms of motion handling and image sharpness in PC games, it’s hard to find any faults. The situation is a bit different for everyday office work, web browsing, or text editing. While fonts remain readable, the specific subpixel structure of the WOLED panel (with an additional white subpixel) can make itself noticeable. When sitting very close to the screen, letter edges and small interface elements may show slight colored fringes or appear slightly softened. This is a characteristic of WOLED panels. In practice, however, it’s not a major problem. We tested the 65-inch variant, which is naturally used from about a meter or more away. From that distance the effect practically disappears and does not interfere with daily work. It may be more significant in the smallest versions, such as 42 or 48 inches, which often sit on desks and are used from a few dozen centimeters away.

Viewing angles

4.5/10

7.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
74%
31%

TCL C8L uses a VA-type panel, which by nature is not known for wide viewing angles. In this case, however, the manufacturer used TCL CSOT's proprietary WHVA 2.0 panel. As a result, viewing angles are significantly better than those of average VA panels, which is definitely a plus. Colors and contrast do not degrade as drastically when moving slightly off-axis as they do on most LCD screens. Overall, it's still a level below IPS panels, and even more so below OLED displays, but for a VA LCD panel the improvement is quite noticeable.

Viewing angles on the Samsung S90H are very good and among the best on the market. That's thanks to the OLED panel, which when viewed from the side doesn't lose brightness or color saturation as quickly as many LCD TVs. The image therefore keeps its proper appearance for longer, which matters especially when you're watching TV with a larger group and not everyone is seated directly in front of the screen. Only at very extreme angles can you notice the advantage of QD-OLED panels. In their case viewing angles are practically perfect, while on WOLED panels the colors and brightness begin to shift slightly.

Daytime performance

10/10

6.5/10

Panel finish
Glare
Matte
Reflection suppression
Decent
Very Good
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Panel brightness

Samsung S90H (WOLED): 473 cd/m2

TCL C8L / QM8L : 1651 cd/m2

The TCL C8L is one of the brightest TVs we've tested so far. As you can see from the brightness chart (or rather, you might not), its peak brightness reaches a cosmic 5,000 nits (exactly 4,862)! Although with a full-screen white image that value drops to around 600 nits, the TV's overall daytime performance lets us confidently say it's an almost perfect screen for very bright, sunlit living rooms. While the glossy panel used here doesn't suppress reflections as aggressively as matte screens, the display's enormous brightness can cut through most unwanted reflections from windows or other artificial light sources such as lamps.

There is one thing, however, in which the S90H with a WOLED panel performs better than the QD-OLED version. It's about viewing in a strongly sunlit room. Thanks to the presence of a conventional polarizer, black doesn't shift here as much toward gray or a dark cherry tone as it does with QD-OLED panels. Combined with the new matte finish, this gives very good results. The image, even in strong light, retains more depth, and colors don't lose their vibrancy as quickly. That doesn't mean the screen stays completely black under all conditions. Under very strong lighting you can notice a slight purple tint, typical of WOLED panels. In the S90H it is partially muted by the matte coating and isn't as noticeable.

Ultimately both variants perform similarly in this category. WOLED does a better job of holding black in a bright room, but on the other hand delivers slightly lower SDR brightness. At times the difference compared with the QD-OLED version can be around 150 nits.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED Super QLED (SQD)
WRGB OLED
Software version during testing
V8-0015T01-LF1V080.000644
T-RSMHDEUC-0100-120 4.3, E4601200, BT - G. albo 1204
Image processor
mt9655 2,5GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review TCL C8L / QM8L TV Panel details
Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV Panel details

TCL C8L / QM8L

Samsung S90H (WOLED)

TV features

8.3/10

7.3/10

  • System
    Google TV
    Tizen
  • System performance
    Very good
    Very good
  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review TCL C8L / QM8L  TV features
Review TCL C8L / QM8L  TV features
Review TCL C8L / QM8L  TV features
Review TCL C8L / QM8L  TV features
Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    No
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

SmartTV: Google TV

Online you can still come across older opinions about TCL where users complained about slow performance or occasional freezes of the Google TV interface. With the C8L model, however, there's a big step forward. Thanks to a new processor and some fixes, Google TV's stability and speed are at a very high level. We can easily compare the system's operation to closed systems like Tizen or webOS found in competing flagship models. On board it comes with a full package of features, led by the updated Gemini voice system.

TV features

For typical TV-related matters the C8L simply reliably fulfills its role as a television 😉. You'll find classic, standard solutions here, such as a Bluetooth module for smooth pairing of wireless headphones and the still-present teletext for the built-in tuners. However, it's clearly a model designed primarily for modern streaming platforms. One sign of this is the minimalist, modern remote, which, unlike the cheaper C7L, lacks a traditional numeric keypad entirely.

Classic TV

When it comes to ordinary cable or over-the-air TV, Samsung doesn't offer any revolutions compared with last year's model. Setting aside the marketing AI features, you simply get a solid, traditional package: a full set of tuners, a CI slot for a decoding card, teletext, and a convenient RF remote that doesn't require pointing directly at the screen. The problem is that the market competition offers exactly the same, and the S90H adds nothing new in this area. What's more, the PIP function, picture-in-picture, has been dropped from the S90 series. If you liked keeping an eye on the news in the corner of the screen while watching another program, you can't do that here.

Smart TV: Tizen

While it's hard to call anything new for traditional TV, Tizen in its 2026 version performs really well. The most important news is that the system runs incredibly smoothly and responds to commands without unnecessary hesitation. Any animation stutters or lag in menu navigation have disappeared. Even though it's Samsung's proprietary platform, rather than the Google TV many dislike, the app lineup is complete — you'll find absolutely all major VOD services here. Cloud gaming fans will also be pleased, because the gaming section has been heavily refined. For everyday Smart TV use, it's an exceptionally fast and mature environment.

Apps

9.6/10

9.3/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.4/10

9.1/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
Yes
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in USB media player handles everyday tests without the slightest problems. It's good to see that the TV natively and smoothly opens even less common image formats, such as Apple's HEIC. We did encounter a few formats that the factory app couldn't handle, but with Google TV that's no barrier. A huge advantage of this system is the ability to install any third-party player (e.g., VLC) directly from Google Play, which often completely resolves file compatibility issues.

The built-in media player easily handles most popular video, audio, and photo formats. The range of supported files is broad enough that the inability to install external apps like VLC is hardly a problem. However, we did encounter one serious bug when trying to open HEIC photos from an iPhone. The TV not only failed to display the files, it caused Tizen to completely freeze. The system stopped responding to the remote, and we had to unplug it from the outlet. This is a clear software bug that Samsung should patch as soon as possible in the next firmware update.

Sound

8.1/10

8.4/10

  • Maximum volume
    78dB
    -
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

It might seem that in terms of sound the TCL C8L would perform exactly the same as last year’s C8K. After all, the Bang & Olufsen-branded 6.2.2 audio system is on board again, with the same power and the same system features, namely Beosonic technology. Nothing could be further from the truth. The new generation performed noticeably better in our listening tests. Why is that? To be honest, from a purely hardware standpoint we don't know, but it's clear on the graphs from our measurements. Maybe TCL simply managed to improve the speakers' behavior with a new software update and better speaker tuning and drive. But as we always say, they're still TV speakers. We believe anyone who wants to fully enjoy this TV's potential will still need to buy a good soundbar or a home theater system. The C8L offers full support for audio codecs like Dolby Atmos and the niche DTS. Only by connecting an external audio setup will you be able to get true, immersive spatial sound from movies or games and complement what you see on this TV.

On paper the audio specification of the S90 series has stood still for years. It still uses a 2.1 configuration with a total power of 40 W, so before testing we assumed any noticeably better sound would mainly apply to the largest variants. However, the 65-inch model we tested also sounded noticeably better than its predecessors. The sound is fuller, more dynamic and has more "weight" than the dry technical specs would suggest. We don't know whether Samsung changed anything in the speakers themselves or whether the improvement is mainly due to better tuning and software optimization, but you can hear the effect from the first moments. For such a slim TV the S90H performs really well and for many people may be sufficient even without a soundbar. The only real complaint is the lack of DTS:X support, which unfortunately is increasingly absent from TVs. It does have Dolby Atmos, so users of streaming services are unlikely to feel any major drawback. Those most likely to be left wanting are people using Blu-ray discs, where DTS tracks still appear fairly often.

* In the test we used the S90H variant. The S92H is also available for purchase; it is equipped with two additional 20 W drivers. This results in a 2.1.2 setup with a total power of 60 W, so you can expect stronger and more spacious sound. We can't confirm that, however, as we didn't have the chance to test that version.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

78dBC (Max)

75dBC

No acoustic data

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy