TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" vs LG NANO81A / NANO80A

Direct comparison

C7K / Q7C / MQLED85K / C79K / C71K / QM7K

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”98”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”86”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.4

5.7

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.2

    5.1

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.9

    5.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.8

    5.4

  • Gaming on console

    8.7

    6.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.4

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    6.4

    4.0

  • Utility functions

    7.3

    6.6

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    7.7

    6.2

Advantages

  • Very good black - VA panel with a large number of Mini-LED zones

  • High brightness in HDR - over 1000 nits

  • Great for gamers - HDMI 2.1, low input lag, VRR, ALLM, etc.

  • Good motion fluidity - 144Hz panel

  • Supports multiple HDR formats: HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision

  • Google TV operating system with access to a huge app library

  • Pleasant sound from built-in speakers (6.2.2) Bang & Olufsen

  • Wide viewing angles (IPS panel)

  • Very low input lag (around 10-12 ms)

  • Smooth webOS 2025 system

  • Intuitive Magic remote with cursor

  • Better color gamut coverage thanks to NanoCell filter

  • Excellent as a PC monitor (sharp text, Chroma 4:4:4)

  • Decent features for gamers (VRR, ALLM, HGiG)

  • Extensive calibration options and natural colors after adjustments

  • Good image processing and efficient scaling of older content

  • Noticeable bass in the sound

Disadvantages

No like
  • Google TV can work with minor stutters

  • No USB recording and PiP function

  • Poor black and low contrast

  • Low brightness (about 250 nits – weak for very bright rooms)

  • Panel refresh rate only 60 Hz

  • USB player without support for HEIC files and very large photos (over 20 Mpix)

Our verdict

There are TVs that make it to reviews and at first glance seem like just another "mediocre" model. The TCL C7K looks just like that – without big slogans about revolution, without ambitions to dethrone OLEDs. Yet after spending a few days with this model, it's hard not to come to the conclusion that it's truly a successful piece of equipment. The biggest advantages? Very good picture quality at a reasonable price. MiniLED combined with a QLED filter delivers vibrant colors, high brightness, and contrast that really impresses in this class. Motion in sports or games looks smooth, and the presence of HDMI 2.1 and 144 Hz refresh rate makes gaming on this model pure enjoyment. Additionally, the Google TV system offers a huge range of possibilities: from voice control, to AirPlay support, to access to all the most important applications.

Are there any drawbacks? Yes. MiniLED still has its limitations, and in the most challenging movie scenes, compromises in dimming can be noticeable. Google TV also doesn't always operate perfectly smoothly. But these are rather minor issues that do not overshadow the overall picture – which is truly positive. It’s also worth highlighting the difference between variants. The 50-inch version we tested can be surprising, but the 55–85 inch models perform distinctly better – they have more backlight zones, even better contrast quality, and superior sound. Therefore, if you're considering purchasing the C7K, it's definitely worth going for a larger size.

LG NANO81A is essentially a continuation of the NanoCell series, which has hardly changed over the past few years. Aside from a new operating system, a refreshed remote, and a few marketing additions, we are dealing with practically the same design that we have known for years. Thanks to the nanofilter, the TV is capable of displaying better, cleaner colors than standard budget TVs, and the IPS panel guarantees really decent viewing angles. Unfortunately, for these advantages, we pay a very weak black level and low contrast, which is immediately noticeable during nighttime viewings. Although webOS is still one of the best systems on the market, the biggest problem with the NANO81A is its price, which we simply do not understand. In 2025, this model faces enormous competition not only from brands like TCL or Hisense but... at LG itself. The model we tested earlier, QNED80A, is equipped with local dimming technology, has a brighter panel, and offers a wider color gamut. Interestingly, at the time of writing this review, the technically superior QNED80A is often much cheaper than the NANO81A. In this situation, the existence of the NanoCell model loses its meaning – unless wide viewing angles are your only priority, but in our opinion, the price you have to pay for them (at the cost of tragic blacks and a higher expenditure) is simply too high.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Good
Average
Stand type
Central
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

8.1/10

1.5/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 1008 (42 x 24)

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Contrast and black detail

Result

256,000:1

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Contrast and black detail

Result

59,850:1

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Contrast and black detail

Result

22,200:1

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Contrast and black detail

Result

16,850:1

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Contrast and black detail

Result

11,400:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

800:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

850:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

750:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Contrast and black detail
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Contrast and black detail
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Contrast and black detail
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Contrast and black detail

The results of black and contrast tests on models from 55 to 85 inches are very similar, which is why in the main part of the evaluation we refer to the 65-inch version. It is a natural phenomenon that larger sizes mean a greater number of backlight zones, and in the case of 65 inches, we counted over 1000. The effect is very good – the contrast is at a high level and is definitely better than in the smallest, 50-inch variant. Typical MiniLED limitations are still noticeable, such as the halo effect or a somewhat too aggressive dimming of the image, but here they are less perceptible than in the smaller model.

For comparison, it is worth recalling that the 50-inch TCL C7K, although surprising with its use of as many as 336 dimming zones, had difficulties managing the backlight in more complicated scenes – there were instances of overexposure or loss of detail. In larger sizes, this problem does not disappear completely, but thanks to a greater number of zones, its impact on the image perception is less bothersome.

The NanoCell series, including the NANO81 model we tested, is based on an IPS panel. For anyone who has even a little knowledge about screens, this means one thing: significant problems with black levels and contrast. Our measurements are ruthless here. A result of 800:1 is, quite frankly, a tragic score. In practice, this means that what should appear on the screen as deep black looks like a dark gray blot at night. Watching dark films or series in a completely dark room will simply be torturous – the image will lose all its depth and will appear flat. If you decide to go with this model, we have one key piece of advice for you: don't watch it in complete darkness. To salvage the situation somewhat, it's best to leave a soft light on in the room, and the ideal solution would be to install an LED strip behind the television. Such wall lighting will trick your eye (this is known as simultaneous contrast) and make that grayness on the screen seem a bit darker. Nonetheless, the start of the test in terms of cinematic experiences looks bleak.

HDR effect quality

6.2/10

3.6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
HDR10, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 94.0%, Bt.2020: 73.5%
DCI P3: 87.6%, Bt.2020: 65.3%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Brightness measurement

Result

1108 nit

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Brightness measurement

Result

405 nit

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Brightness measurement

Result

865 nit

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Brightness measurement

Result

290 nit

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Brightness measurement

Result

848 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

228 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

168 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

252 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" HDR effect quality
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" HDR effect quality
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" HDR effect quality
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

LG NANO81A / NANO80A

HDR luminance

TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85"

HDR luminance

In terms of brightness, the models from 55 to 85 inches in the C7K series are truly impressive. In the best testing conditions, the 65-inch screen achieved over 1200 nits, which practically means that the brightest scenes can dazzle with almost cinematic brilliance. These are not just dry numbers from measurements – during screenings, white skies, explosions, or light reflections on water looked incredibly striking, often giving the impression that the television exceeds its price class. This is particularly effective in scenes with a large area of illumination, where the screen is filled with intense brightness – such as in sun-drenched shots or during dynamic action sequences. Viewers looking for strong HDR will definitely be satisfied.

However, scenes requiring precise control of backlighting – with small points of light on a dark background – are more challenging. Here the C7K, despite having over a thousand zones, can still dim brightness to maintain deep blacks. The effect is that in films like Sicario 2 or Life of Pi, some details, such as a distant lantern or single reflections, can be less defined or blend in with the surroundings. This is a compromise inherent to MiniLED technology – it provides excellent image depth and blacks at a level that ordinary LCDs do not offer, but this comes at the cost of limited visibility of the smallest lights.

If you're counting on HDR in the NANO81A to bring tears to your eyes, I have to disappoint you. This TV is simply too dark to show what this format is really about. With a brightness of just 250 nits, HDR here essentially exists only on paper. In practice, during a viewing session, it's very hard to distinguish whether we're watching high dynamic range content or regular SDR – it simply lacks that "punch" of light in bright areas of the image. But, to not have all criticism, we do have a glimmer of light at the end of the tunnel – and it’s quite clear. It's about color gamut coverage. Here, the NanoCell filter shows that it's not just marketing nonsense. Our measurements indicated that the coverage of the DCI-P3 space is around 88%. This is really a solid result that positions this model significantly above typical budget models based on regular white LED lights without any filters. Of course, it's still a bit lacking compared to the level of quantum dot TVs (QLED) or advanced panels with PFS filtering, but for this price range, the colors are surprisingly saturated and vibrant. It's just a shame that this low brightness doesn’t allow them to fully "spread their wings" with the Nano filter.

Factory color reproduction

6/10

5.3/10

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Factory color reproduction
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Factory color reproduction
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

The novelty in TCL televisions for 2025 is the long-awaited Filmmaker mode, which until now could be found in most competitive brands. This is great news because this mode is considered the most faithful to the original vision of the creators and is often recommended by enthusiasts of good picture quality. Unfortunately – as is often the case – the mere presence of this mode does not guarantee perfection. The Filmmaker mode in the TCL C7K is not free from flaws. One could point out the incorrect white balance, particularly the slight dominance of blue, which led to cool, somewhat grayish skin tones. But that was not the biggest problem. The main complaint was excessive brightness exposure, which is clearly visible in the gamma and EOTF charts. The image was simply too bright, at times almost blown out, which affected not only the depth of scenes but also the overall viewing experience. Some details were simply lost, and the whole image looked as if someone had slightly overdone the brightness slider. As always – we decided to see what could be squeezed out of this after calibration. And that’s when things started to get really interesting…

For every movie fan, the natural choice in LG televisions is the Filmmaker Mode. This mode is designed to display the image as the director intended – without unnecessary "enhancements." Unfortunately, in the case of our test unit NANO81A, the factory settings left something to be desired. The main issue turned out to be white balance. Measurements showed a clear deficiency of blue color, which practically translated to many scenes having a slightly yellowish, almost "too yellow" tint. The white was not perfectly clean, which detracted from the freshness of the image. Additionally, brightness management was not ideal either – the factory-set gamma was too low. The image often appeared oversaturated, as if it had been pulled too much from the shadows, losing its naturalness and depth. Fortunately, LG, even in this relatively low price segment, does not block access to advanced settings. The calibration capabilities of this model are immense, which is a big plus for those who like to "dig around" in the menu. We decided to approach the topic in our own way and see how much we could extract from this panel with professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.5/10

7.5/10

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Color reproduction after calibration
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Color reproduction after calibration
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Color reproduction after calibration
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Color reproduction after calibration

After calibration, the TCL C7K showed itself in a really good light, especially when it comes to SDR content. We managed to tune the white balance, color gamut, and brightness characteristics so precisely that color errors on the ColorChecker palette dropped below a value of 2. For the uninitiated – this is almost a perfect result, which means that the image is very close to what the creators intended. Unfortunately, it looked worse with 4K HDR content. Although we were able to slightly calm the white balance and correct its previous errors, it is still evident that the television has some "MiniLED traits," especially in brightness management. When we checked how the C7K handles the EOTF curve on actual film scenes, and not just on synthetic test patterns, it turned out that the screen still tends to slightly brighten the entire image. This affects the overall experience – black loses some depth, and the image becomes less contrastive than it should be. Despite these minor shortcomings in HDR content, the overall reception of materials – especially in SDR – is really very good. After calibration, the C7K can display an image that can successfully compete with much more expensive models. Good color tuning, natural skin tones, and pleasant brightness make movie sessions and everyday content viewing more than satisfactory.

After calibrating the NANO81A, it's a completely different television. What LG offers in terms of image enhancement tools even in such an inexpensive model deserves a big plus. We were able to completely eliminate that annoying yellowing of whites and make the colors natural, juicy, and simply "true." In SDR content (such as regular TV, YouTube, or older films), the picture now looks infinitely better – it's clear, well-balanced, and no longer strains the eyes with strange hues. It's evident that this panel has considerable potential, which is simply wasted by poor presets out of the box. However, we have one serious reservation that calibration cannot fully overcome – it's about brightness management in HDR mode. The algorithm LG uses in this model is designed very conservatively. The television deliberately dims the image in HDR to avoid overexposing an already weak black from the IPS panel. The developers faced a choice: either provide more light and accept that black will turn light gray, or reduce the brightness to maintain any contrast. They chose the latter. Nevertheless, after our adjustments, watching anything on the NANO81 is significantly better.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.6/10

9.3/10

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Smoothness of tonal transitions

TCL C7K handles color gradation very well – in most tested scenes, the tonal transitions were smooth, and the colors blended together without visible outlines or an artificial “blots” effect. In everyday use, it’s hard to find anything to complain about – the image looks natural, without irritating transitions or digital artifacts. Certain limitations only appear in very dark tones – especially in a heavily muted gray palette, where the television may struggle to reproduce the perfect gradation. But that’s absolutely understandable, as even many significantly more expensive models in this range simply give up. Fortunately, these situations are rare and do not significantly affect the overall perception.

The fluidity of tonal transitions is an element where NANO81A really shines. LG proves here that it can refine image processing algorithms even in its cheaper models. During testing, we practically did not record the phenomenon of banding, that is, the annoying "steps" visible where one color should smoothly transition into another. Everything looks incredibly natural and smooth. This is especially evident in the bright scenes from the movie Kingsman, where the backgrounds remain clean and free from digital artifacts. However, even more impressive is how the television handles the extremely challenging, dark, and foggy shots in The Revenant. Where many budget panels falter and deliver ugly splotches instead of a smooth mist, the NANO81A maintains its composure, offering very velvety transitions. The only downside is that with darker shades, you will notice the weaker blacks of this TV rather than any issues with color transitions.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5.5/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

TCL C7K features a function that, according to the manufacturer, is supposed to smooth out unwanted color transitions – something like a rescue for less successful tonal changes. It's called "Gradual Smoothing" and... well, it sounds ambitious, but in practice, it works very poorly. Regardless of whether we set it to low or high, the difference is minimal. Worse still – the function can cut out elements from the image that should remain. Fortunately, film grain remains untouched, so at least it doesn't smooth everything indiscriminately, but still – it's better to just turn this option off.

When it comes to scaling lower-resolution content, it's already better. SD and HD materials look quite decent, although sometimes we felt that the image loses sharpness and becomes too soft – as if something took away its clarity. Fortunately, with very low sources (e.g., 576p), there was no overscan effect, meaning the image was not artificially cropped – everything fit on the screen as it should.

It often happens that cheap 4K panels mercilessly bring all the "dirt" and imperfections of lower resolution materials to light. However, in the case of the LG NANO81A, the situation is quite different. It’s a really solid performer when it comes to handling content that is far from ideal. The built-in processor does a great job with upscaling. Even older recordings look quite decent on this screen – the image is coherent, cleaned of digital noise, and simply pleasant to the eye. A big plus is the gradation reduction feature that you will find in the settings. It is exceptionally effective in combating color banding, which is a lifesaver when watching low bitrate materials, for example from some streaming services or older files from the internet. However, it is worth maintaining a certain vigilance. Since we are dealing with a less efficient chip than in LG's top models here, too aggressive an adjustment of this option can sometimes result in minor artifacts or a slight blurring of details. Despite this risk, I definitely encourage experimentation with this feature – in many cases, it can save the viewing experience and make low-quality material fully watchable.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.1/10

4.6/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
No
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 120Hz
No
Brightness drop with BFI
31%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur ():

The TCL C7K handles motion fluency really well. The panel used in it offers a refresh rate of 144 Hz, which in itself suggests that this TV is something more than just an ordinary "60 Hz" panel. Moreover, if we connect the C7K to a computer and set the resolution to Full HD. But we'll write more about that in the paragraph about gamers and PC collaboration. Back to everyday use – both sports and movies look very good here. Thanks to the fast panel and well-functioning motion smoother, the C7K is great for watching matches, but also for movie screenings. In the menu, we find two sliders – blur reduction and flicker reduction – which allow you to tailor the smoothness effect to your own preferences. At lower settings, we get a more cinematic effect, with a slight stutter in motion. At higher settings – the image becomes more theatrical, smooth to the point of exaggeration. Everyone can set it up according to their liking.

In terms of motion fluidity, the NANO81A unfortunately has a few drawbacks. The TV is based on a panel with a refresh rate of 60 Hz. If you're looking for perfect sharpness in dynamic football matches or fast-paced action games, you might feel somewhat unsatisfied. With such a low native refresh rate, fast-moving objects on the screen will always be a bit blurry.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 240Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

TCL C7K is a television that on paper looks like the dream equipment for gamers – and most importantly, it holds up well in practice. First, the good news: we have two full-bandwidth HDMI 2.1 ports, so we can easily connect both a console and a computer, taking full advantage of their capabilities. The panel itself supports a refresh rate of 144 Hz, which provides a significant advantage in dynamic games. Additionally, it comes with a full suite of gaming features: VRR (variable refresh rate), ALLM (automatic low latency mode), and support for Dolby Vision in games. There's also an HGiG mode that allows for HDR effects consistent with the creators' intentions. GameBar, which is an informative bar for the gamer. It operates quickly, looks clear (like the Nintendo console👌), and shows what’s most important: the current frame count, VRR status, and even HDR parameters.

NANO81A is unfortunately not a device designed for e-sports. The lack of support for a 120 Hz signal is a fact that users planning to purchase this model must simply come to terms with. Nevertheless, LG engineers have worked hard to squeeze the maximum capabilities out of this 60 Hz panel, offering a set of features that genuinely enhance the gaming experience. Above all, the television supports VRR technology (in the range of 48–60 Hz) and ALLM. As a result, the image remains stable and does not "tear," and the device automatically switches to low-latency mode as soon as it detects a signal from the console. Managing these settings is incredibly simple thanks to a dedicated system overlay that allows for a quick overview of parameters without leaving the game. A significant advantage is the support for the HGiG format. This solution is crucial for owners of modern consoles, as it enables the TV to correctly "understand" the intentions of game developers regarding HDR tone mapping. In practice, this helps avoid the effect of "blown out" bright spots, such as clouds or light sources, which unfortunately is a common issue in budget LCD televisions.

Input lag

9.6/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
18 ms
13 ms
1080p120
12 ms
2160p60
18 ms
12 ms
2160p120
12 ms

HDR

2160p60
18 ms
12 ms
2160p120
12 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
18 ms
2160p120 DV
12 ms

When it comes to delays, the C7K gives no reason to complain. In games at 120 Hz, the input lag is around 10 ms, which means the television responds really quickly. Interestingly, even in Dolby Vision mode, the result is very similar, which is not always the standard. Good job, TCL. At 60 Hz, the lag naturally increases a bit, but that's completely normal and applies to virtually every television with a refresh rate of 120 Hz or higher. The most important thing is that everything still operates smoothly and there’s no feeling that something is unresponsive to our actions.

In terms of response speed, the LG NANO81A performs exceptionally well. The input lag we measured is about 12 ms. This is a very low result, which means one thing for a gamer – the delay between moving the joystick on the controller and the reaction on the screen is practically imperceptible. The television performs excellently in dynamic titles, where every millisecond matters, and in this regard, it does not fall behind significantly more expensive models.

Compatibility with PC

8.4/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
12ms
12ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Compatibility with PC
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Compatibility with PC

If we intend to connect the C7K to a computer – especially for gaming – there’s really a lot to play for. We have 4K at 144 Hz, which sounds great on its own, but if we lower the resolution, the TV can display even 280 Hz. In e-sports, where every fraction of a second counts, this really makes a difference. Additionally, it supports G-Sync and FreeSync, so no matter what graphics card we have – the image will be smooth, without any stuttering or tearing.

However, if we plan to place the C7K on a desk and use it like a monitor, it’s a bit less "rosy." Yes, it supports chroma 4:4:4, so the fonts should be sharp, but with very dark letters, there’s a slight blurriness and dimming of the edges. It's not something that immediately stands out while gaming or watching, but when working with text – it can be distracting. In everyday use – rather without concerns, but if we plan to place 50 inches a meter from our face, it’s worth keeping this in mind.

Nano81A is a really solid monitor for text work. Thanks to the IPS panel and proper implementation of Chroma 4:4:4, fonts are very clear and sharp – practically anyone will be satisfied with how this screen performs as a monitor. We only noticed one small detail that we caught with our laboratory scrutiny: vertical lines of dark text are slightly darker than those horizontal ones. However, this phenomenon is minimal enough that we decided not to deduct points for it. The ratings went down only for features typical for PC gamers – it lacks G-Sync support and high refresh rates above 60 Hz, which will be a significant drawback for those looking for a screen for fast-paced computer games.

Viewing angles

3/10

6.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
78%
66%

There are no surprises here – the C7K has classic viewing angles for a VA panel. That is: sitting directly in front – it’s great. The colors look good, the contrast is strong, everything is in place. But just slightly shifting to the side begins to worsen the experience – the image loses saturation, blacks turn gray, and the overall impression suffers a bit. So if we plan to watch together with several people or have a couch that occupies half the living room – it’s worth seating everyone more centrally. You can watch from the side, but don’t expect miracles – it’s just a characteristic of VA panels.

This is the moment when the LG NANO81A can finally "breathe" and make up for the points lost in the black and contrast category. Thanks to the use of an IPS panel, the viewing angles are simply very good here. This is where the tested model gains the most and clearly shows its advantage over competing televisions equipped with VA panels. In practice, this means that the image does not lose quality, even when viewed from a wide angle. This makes the NANO81A a great option for those who have a wide furniture layout in their living room or frequently watch games and movies with a larger group.

Daytime performance

6.4/10

4/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Daytime performance
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Daytime performance
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" Daytime performance
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

LG NANO81A / NANO80A : 247 cd/m2

TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85": 529 cd/m2

Fortunately, the TCL C7K performs quite well in a bright room. The applied panel has a satin finish that effectively suppresses reflections, making it so that even on sunny days, we don’t have to worry about reflections from lamps or windows. Importantly, the colors maintain their intensity and do not wash out, as can happen with weaker matte panels. Regarding brightness itself, the average for content like YouTube or regular television reaches a little below 500 nits. It’s not a record-setting result— for example, the MQLED85 (C765) performs better in this regard. However, for everyday watching during the day, it should work without major issues, as long as we don’t plan to place it opposite a south-facing window without curtains.

NANO81A is a relatively dark television, so it works best in rooms where you have control over the lighting. With a brightness reaching around 250 nits, it is hard to recommend it wholeheartedly for very bright, heavily sunlit living rooms – under such conditions, the image will simply lack punch. Nevertheless, LG deserves a small plus for the screen finish. The satin panel used here dampens reflections quite decently. As a result, even if there is a bit of light in the room, you won't see reflections of every detail from your surroundings on the screen. So, if you can slightly close the blinds, a daytime viewing experience will be quite possible, but this model was simply not designed to "fight" against full sunlight.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
White LED
Software version during testing
V8.0012T01-LF1V531.002396
33.21.62
Image processor
MT5896 2,5GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" TV Panel details
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV Panel details
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" TV Panel details
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV Panel details

TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85"

LG NANO81A / NANO80A

TV features

7.3/10

6.6/10

  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 55"-85" TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV features

SmartTV: GoogleTV

The biggest strength of the TCL C7K in everyday use is undoubtedly the Google TV system. Thanks to it, we have access to an almost endless library of applications, including those more niche ones that are often unavailable on other platforms. The built-in Google Assistant understands Polish, so we can easily ask what is on TV, what the weather is like, and even issue a few voice commands to control the television. We also have to appreciate the presence of Chromecast and AirPlay, which work smoothly and make life easier.

Usability Features

On the downside, the classic features perform a bit worse. Of course, we will find the basics here – teletext, EPG, or the ability to connect headphones – but that's basically it. There is a lack of USB recording functionality and picture-in-picture (PiP) mode, which can still be found with the competition at times. It is also worth noting that Google TV in the TCL version can sometimes have oddly translated fragments of the menu or minor interface bugs. These are not things that hinder everyday use, but detail-oriented people might notice them.

Smart Features: WebOS

One of the biggest advantages of the NANO81A model is its “brain,” which is the operating system. LG has implemented a full-fledged WebOS version for 2025, which in terms of fluidity and user experience is on par with the more expensive models of this brand. Applications launch smoothly, and navigating the menu is a pure pleasure – there is no sign of irritating lags that often occur with budget competitors. All of this is thanks to the unique remote control with a pointer (cursor) function, which has undergone a visual makeover this year. The manufacturer has opted for minimalism – the new Magic remote is significantly smaller and more ergonomic than its predecessors. It sits perfectly in the hand, but this change has a downside as well. The physical number pad has completely disappeared from the casing. For younger users, accustomed to streaming and selecting tiles, this will not be a problem. However, older household members, who are used to entering channel numbers from memory, will have to change their long-standing habits.

Everyday Use

In terms of features we would call “classic,” the NANO81A relies on proven standards. It is not a multimedia powerhouse that will surprise you with exotic additions, but it performs flawlessly in everyday television tasks. The handling of traditional terrestrial or cable television, including the old good Teletext, is correct and intuitive. Wireless communication also deserves praise. The Bluetooth module works very reliably, allowing for quick and stable connections to game console controllers or wireless headphones and speakers. It’s simply a TV that “works” – it is stable, predictable, and does not create unnecessary complications in daily use.

Apps

9.6/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.2/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
Yes
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in file player in the TCL C7K performs really well. It supports most popular audio and video formats, so if we want to quickly load something from a USB drive and play it, there shouldn't be a problem. Of course, as is often the case, there can be some minor shortcomings – not every exotic codec will work (Apple's HEIC), not all subtitles will be perfectly synchronized (txt.). However, the biggest advantage of this television comes to the rescue, which is Google TV. Thanks to access to the Google Play Store, we can easily install an alternative player, such as VLC, and then no file will be a challenge for us.

Many users still use their own USB drives to display movies or photos on the big screen. In this regard, the NANO81A performs quite decently – the built-in player supports a wide range of video and audio codecs, so most movie libraries will start up "right away." However, it is important to remember the specifics of the WebOS system. Since it is a closed environment, we are limited to what the manufacturer has prepared for us. There is no possibility of installing alternative players (like the popular VLC), so if the system player cannot handle something, there is not much that can be done about it. During tests, we encountered a few specific limitations. Above all, there is a lack of support for HEIC files. If you take photos with an iPhone and want to view them directly from the USB drive, the TV simply will not see them – it's worth changing the format to JPG on your phone right away. We also noticed that the player has difficulty processing very large graphic files. Photos with a resolution of around 20–28 Mpix may not load or cause system errors. Aside from these exceptions, daily multimedia handling is hassle-free.

Sound

7.7/10

6.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

In larger versions of the C7K (from 55 inches and up), the sound makes an even better impression than in the smallest, 50-inch variant. This is due to the greater number of built-in speakers and additional channels that provide a fuller, more spacious sound. The bass becomes clearer, dialogues gain clarity, and sound effects can truly fill the room.

It's worth mentioning the collaboration between TCL and the Bang & Olufsen brand, which appeared in the 2025 models. Even if we are not a hundred percent sure whether original drivers from the Danish company are working inside, the final effect is surprisingly positive. As far as a TV without an additional soundbar goes, the larger C7K models offer sound that can be enjoyed even during longer movie sessions.

When it comes to audio, the LG NANO81A pleasantly surprises compared to its higher-positioned sibling, the QNED80A model. Interestingly, NanoCell sounds slightly better, which is likely due to its somewhat thicker casing. The increased volume allows for the extraction of some low-end nuances – the bass may not be powerful, but it is more distinctly defined than in thinner constructions. However, one shouldn't expect miracles. It is still a standard 2.0 speaker arrangement with a total power of 20 W, so the overall sound characteristics remain similar to other models in this price range. The mid and high tones are acceptable, making dialogues in movies and news programs clear. While this slight improvement in the lower registers is pleasing, for true home cinema or music listening, it is still worth considering the purchase of at least a simple soundbar.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

81dBC (Max)

75dBC