TCL C7K / QM7K 50" vs SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2)

Direct comparison

C7K / Q7C / MQLED85K / C79K / C71K / QM7K

Info

BRAVIA 3 II / XR35M2

Available screen sizes: 50”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”85”100”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.2

7.0

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.7

    6.5

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.5

    6.3

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.7

    6.7

  • Gaming on console

    8.5

    8.1

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.4

    7.2

  • Watching in bright light

    6.1

    5.8

  • Utility functions

    7.3

    7.9

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    7.0

    6.8

Advantages

  • Very good black - VA panel with a large number of Mini-LED zones

  • High brightness in HDR - over 1000 nits

  • Great for gamers - HDMI 2.1, low input lag, VRR, ALLM, etc.

  • Good motion fluidity - 144Hz panel

  • Support for multiple HDR formats: HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision

  • Google TV operating system with access to a huge app base

  • Pleasant sound from built-in speakers

  • Very good motion clarity and exceptionally low motion blur for a 120Hz LCD TV

  • 4 × HDMI 2.1 48 Gbps, finally!

  • Lots of gaming features: VRR, ALLM, low input lag

  • Wide color gamut, QLED (PFS)

  • Supports Dolby Vision

  • Google TV with a wide range of apps and features

  • Broad audio format support: Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Record programs to USB

  • Two remotes included

Disadvantages

No like
  • Google TV can work with minor lags

  • No USB recording and PiP features

  • High price relative to its capabilities; for only a little more you can buy the much better BRAVIA 5

  • No local dimming

  • Lacks proper HGiG support

  • Average processing of lower-quality content

Our verdict

There are TVs that come in for testing and you immediately think: "oh, another average one, probably like many others." And in fact… that's true. The TCL C7K doesn't try to dethrone the OLEDs, it doesn't shout from the box "revolution!". And yet, after a few days of testing, it's hard not to think: "wow, this is really good equipment." And that's exactly what the C7K is. The biggest asset of the C7K is its decent picture at a reasonable price – MiniLED and quantum dots do their job here. The colors are vibrant, the brightness is satisfactory, the contrast is impressive, and with the right settings, you can truly enjoy viewing in the best quality. The second strong point is the fluidity of motion – both in sports and in games. Support for HDMI 2.1, variable refresh rate, 144 Hz, and a whole bunch of other features make playing on this TV a pure pleasure. Additionally, there's Google TV, which – despite minor shortcomings – provides access to nearly an endless library of applications. Voice control, quick access to YouTube, Netflix, AirPlay support – everything you need for daily use is here. Are there any downsides? Sure. The Google TV system sometimes experiences moments of "hesitation," and MiniLED – like any MiniLED – can stumble on very challenging movie scenes. But those are details. After all, the C7K is a mid-range model – and in this class, it simply performs excellently. So if you are looking for a reasonably priced, modern TV with Google TV that looks good, works well, and sounds pretty decent without breaking your budget – the TCL C7K definitely deserves attention.

The Sony Bravia 3 II is a TV that quickly reveals what the manufacturer had in mind for this model. It's meant above all to be a sensible Bravia for gaming, and in that respect the changes are substantial. After all, Sony fixed one of the biggest complaints about its TVs: having only two full HDMI 2.1 ports. Here there are four, and that alone makes the Bravia 3 II a much more convenient choice for anyone who wants to hook up a lot of gaming gear. Fortunately it doesn't stop at gaming. The 120 Hz panel performs very well in terms of motion, motion blur is minimal, and the motion-enhancing systems work surprisingly effectively, sometimes even better than on Sony's top TVs. That's why sports are another use where the Bravia 3 II feels right at home. Add Google TV with its full suite of apps and features, and in terms of everyday use it's the Sony we've known for years.

The biggest problem with this model, however, isn't the TV itself but its current price. The Bravia 3 II is today priced dangerously close to the Bravia 5, and when the premium for the higher model is only a few percent, choosing the lower series starts to lose its point. The Bravia 5 already offers full Mini-LED backlighting with local dimming, exactly what the Bravia 3 II most lacks for evening viewing and in HDR. That's why we look at this model through the lens of price. The Bravia 3 II is a genuinely successful lower midrange TV and, at the right price, could easily be one of the more interesting choices for a gamer or sports fan. However, if the gap to the Bravia 5 remains small, it will be hard to recommend it with full conviction.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Good
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Base adjustment
Accessories
Stand
Two remote controls, Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.1/10

5.6/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 336 (14 x 24)

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 50" Contrast and black detail

Result

161,000:1

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 50" Contrast and black detail

Result

18,750:1

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 50" Contrast and black detail

Result

13,150:1

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 50" Contrast and black detail

Result

6,300:1

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 50" Contrast and black detail

Result

4,200:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,050:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,650:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,850:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

6,400:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,350:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The 50-inch TCL C7K that we tested surprised us right from the start – it's the smallest model in the series, yet it comes equipped with a VA panel with MiniLED backlighting and – attention – as many as 336 dimming zones. For comparison: many significantly larger TVs from higher tiers would be eager to boast such a number. Here we have it in the 50-inch version. Sounds promising, right? So how does this translate into real movie-watching experiences? In the vast majority of tested scenes – very well. The contrast was so high that in measurements it even reached six-digit values, which in practice means very deep blacks and well-separated highlights. In scenes from movies like The Revenant or Oblivion, the effect was impressive, matching the best LCD screens in this class.

However, not everything went perfectly. Despite the impressive number of zones, their management was not always exemplary. In more complex scenes, where there are small light sources or a high level of detail, the TV had issues with the so-called halo effect (a glowing halo around bright objects) or with overly aggressive dimming of the image. In such situations, contrast could either collapse due to overexposing parts of the zones or, conversely – details in bright areas disappeared because the zones suppressed the light too much. Nevertheless, it's worth emphasizing that in the vast majority of scenes, the contrast was more than satisfactory. And considering the size of the TV and its price, the final effect will satisfy not just average users.

The Bravia 3 II uses a VA panel, a solution that by design provides much better contrast than IPS or ADS panels. In our unit the native contrast was about 5000:1, which is a pretty good result for a TV without local dimming. In practice this means that in a mildly lit room blacks can look really decent. Dark parts of the image don't immediately turn gray, and night scenes have noticeably more depth than on many IPS-panel TVs. However, the poorer black performance becomes apparent when you turn off the lights. The Bravia 3 II doesn't have local dimming, so the entire backlight behaves similarly regardless of what's happening in any particular area of the image. In a dark room it's easy to see that black is no longer truly black but starts to shift toward a dark navy. It's not at a level that seriously ruins the movie experience, but during an evening viewing the difference versus a Mini-LED, and even more so versus an OLED TV, becomes very clear.

HDR effect quality

5.4/10

5.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 93.1%, Bt.2020: 72.9%
DCI P3: 94.2%, Bt.2020: 73.9%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 50" Brightness measurement

Result

1051 nit

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 50" Brightness measurement

Result

185 nit

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 50" Brightness measurement

Result

454 nit

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 50" Brightness measurement

Result

200 nit

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 50" Brightness measurement

Result

836 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

408 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

430 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

449 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

457 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

455 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2)

TCL C7K / QM7K 50"

TCL C7K is one of the brightest MiniLED televisions in its price range. Under the best test conditions, the screen was able to achieve over 1200 nits, resulting in impressive, and at times blindingly bright scenes. And most importantly – this is not just a theoretical measurement. In practice, the brightest parts of movies can shine with true cinematic grandeur. Home HDR cinema fans should be truly pleased.

The impression is especially great in scenes with large areas of brightness – white skies, explosions, sun reflections, or magical sunsets can surprise with the intensity of light that rarely appears in this price range.

However, things get a bit worse when more challenging scenarios appear on the screen, which have been described in terms of contrast – meaning images full of details, with small bright elements against a dark background. In such cases, the C7K often chooses to retain black at the expense of brightness. An example? Scenes from the movies Sicario 2 or Life of Pi, where small light sources (like a distant lantern) can be less visible, and details in the lights are simply dimmed or blend into the background.

For many viewers, this may be an acceptable compromise – as we achieve deep blacks and pleasant image texture. Nevertheless, it is worth being aware that the visibility of small details in bright areas is not the strongest suit of this model. It is simply a technological limitation that still exists – even with over 300 zones.

Bravia 3 II is certainly not a TV that tries to impress with brightness. In our measurements it reached about 450 nits, so it's far from the strongest designs on the market. That said, HDR here is not just a paper feature. Compared with regular SDR material, the brightest parts of the image can already punch through, and reflections, highlights, or stronger exposures have a bit more energy and stand out better from the rest of the scene. You can see this best in simpler shots where many bright elements appear on screen. Then the Bravia 3 II can give a hint of a higher-dynamic-range picture. The problem only starts with more demanding content, where much greater brightness headroom is needed. There the TV quickly shows its limits and instead of strong, striking HDR we get only a correctly rendered picture.

Colors

Bravia 3 II uses a QLED-type panel, although technically it does not use a traditional quantum-dot layer. Instead Sony applied a PFS phosphor-based solution that serves a very similar role: it allows for more saturated reds and greens and thus lets the TV display a much wider color gamut. Measurements showed about 94% coverage of the DCI-P3 gamut and about 74.4% of the very wide BT.2020. Those are good results for this class of hardware, meaning the Bravia 3 II has no problem showing adequately saturated colors in HDR content. Colors don't look washed out, and the more intense shades can look really attractive.

Factory color reproduction

6/10

6.3/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

A new feature in TCL televisions for 2025 is the long-awaited Filmmaker mode, which until now could be found in most competitive brands. This is great news because this mode is considered the truest to the original vision of the creators and is often recommended by enthusiasts of good image quality. Unfortunately – as is often the case – the mere presence of this feature does not guarantee perfection. The Filmmaker mode in the TCL C7K is not free of flaws. One could point out the incorrect white balance, particularly the slight dominance of blue, which caused cool, somewhat grayish skin tones. But that was not the biggest problem. The main complaint was excessive brightness exposure, which is clearly visible on the gamma and EOTF graphs. The image was simply too bright, at times even blown out, which affected not only the plasticity of the scenes but also the overall viewing experience. Some details simply got lost, and the whole image looked as if someone had overdone it with the brightness slider. As always – we decided to see what could be squeezed out of it after calibration. And this is where things got really interesting...

In Professional mode the Bravia 3 II, straight out of the box, delivers a fairly good level of color reproduction. In SDR the most noticeable issue is a slightly low gamma, which makes the midtone areas a bit brighter. White balance is not perfect either; as brightness increases there is a slight lack of blue and red, so whites can sometimes take on a slightly warmer, mildly greenish tint. However, these are not errors that immediately stand out while watching a movie. Average error values hover around 3, so the factory preset can be considered quite good. The situation is similar in HDR. Here again there is a slight deficiency in the blue component, so the image is a touch warmer than the reference, but the difference is not large enough to be significantly distracting during normal viewing.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.5/10

8/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, the TCL C7K showed itself in a really good light, especially when it comes to SDR content. We managed to fine-tune the white balance, color gamut, and brightness characteristics so precisely that color errors on the ColorChecker palette dropped below a value of 2. For the uninitiated – this is an almost perfect result, meaning that the image is very close to what the creators intended. Unfortunately, it was less impressive with 4K HDR content. Although we managed to slightly calm the white balance and correct its earlier errors, it is still evident that the TV has certain "MiniLED traits," especially in managing brightness. When we checked how the C7K performed with the EOTF curve on real movie scenes rather than just synthetic test patterns, it turned out that the screen still has a tendency to slightly brighten the entire image. This affects the overall experience – the black loses some depth, and the image becomes less contrasty than it should be. Despite these minor shortcomings in HDR content, the overall reception of materials – especially in SDR – is really very good. After calibration, the C7K can display an image that can successfully compete with much more expensive models. Good color tuning, natural skin tones, and pleasant brightness make movie sessions and everyday content viewing more than satisfactory.

After calibration you can get a lot out of SDR content. The white balance was set almost perfectly, gamma practically matches the reference value, and average color errors fell from around 3 to about 1. That's a level at which differences from the reference image are, in practice, very hard to detect. The Bravia 3 II therefore shows that despite its position in Sony's lineup it has quite a lot of potential for precise picture tuning. Improvements are also visible in HDR, although here you can no longer work around all of the TV's limitations. After equalizing the colors it's easier to notice that the EOTF curve in film material runs slightly below the reference value in places, meaning the Bravia 3 II slightly darkens part of the image. That's not ideal from a reference standpoint, but in this particular TV it also has an advantage. With no local dimming and average black levels, this behavior slightly reduces the visibility of the backlight in darker scenes and helps maintain a greater sense of contrast. So you could say Sony partially masks the limits of the panel that way, rather than trying at all costs to stick to the reference luminance.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.6/10

9.5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The TCL C7K handles color gradation very well – in most tested scenes, tonal transitions were smooth, and colors blended together without visible contours or artificial “blot” effects. In everyday use, it’s hard to find fault with it – the image looks natural, without irritating transitions or digital artifacts. Some limitations only appear in very dark tones – especially in a heavily muted gray palette, where the TV may struggle to reproduce ideal gradation. But this is absolutely understandable, because even many significantly more expensive models in this range simply give up. Fortunately, these situations are rare and do not significantly affect the overall perception.

In terms of tonal transition smoothness, the Bravia 3 II performs very well. In most of the scenes we watched, it was hard to spot any issues with blending individual shades. Gradients remain smooth both in bright parts of the image, like skies or sunsets, and in much more challenging dark shots. The only thing that may be noticeable in our photos, especially in the darkest scenes, is uneven backlighting. This is not related to color banding, but rather a consequence of using a backlight without local dimming.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5.5/10

6/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The TCL C7K features a function that, according to the manufacturer, is supposed to smooth out unwanted color transitions – something like a rescue for less successful tonal shifts. It's called "Gradual Smoothing" and... well, it sounds ambitious, but in practice, it works very poorly. Regardless of whether we set it to low or high, the difference is minimal. What's worse – the function can remove elements from the image that should remain. Fortunately, film grain remains untouched, so at least it doesn't smooth everything indiscriminately, but still – it's better to just turn this option off.

As for scaling lower-resolution content, it's already better. SD and HD materials look quite decent, though sometimes we had the impression that the image loses sharpness and becomes too soft – as if something took away its clarity. Fortunately, at very low sources (e.g., 576p), there was no overscan effect, meaning the image was not artificially cropped – everything fit on the screen as it should.

The Bravia 3 II is Sony’s first TV to use the new MediaTek Pentonic 800 chipset, and you can see a few changes in image processing. Starting with the basics: upscaling is solid. The TV can sensibly upscale lower-resolution material and doesn’t have a strong tendency to overemphasize jagged edges or other source imperfections. With regular broadcast TV or lower-quality streaming the picture remains quite pleasing. We have more reservations about the digital image processing. In this model Sony replaced the well-known "Smooth Gradation" feature with a new setting called "Digital Noise Reduction." Its role is essentially the same: to smooth unpleasant tonal transitions and artifacts caused by heavy compression. Unfortunately, this feature performs noticeably worse than before. At the "Large" setting — the only one that noticeably affected the picture — the TV can smooth away too many image elements at once, causing film grain to disappear and surface textures or even character skin to start looking unnatural. Worse, the effect is not very consistent. When a scene contains more motion the function’s effect weakens significantly and at times it looks as if the TV stops intervening in the image altogether. For everyday viewing we therefore don’t recommend using it at a high level. It can help on a static shot, but the price is often too much loss of detail.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.1/10

8.2/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
120Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 120Hz
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
Brightness drop with BFI
24%
25%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur (4K 144Hz):

Blur ():

TCL C7K handles motion smoothness really very well. The matrix used in it offers a refresh rate of 144 Hz, which already suggests that this TV is something more than just an ordinary "60 Hz" panel. Moreover – if we connect the C7K to a computer and set the resolution to Full HD. But we will write more about this in the paragraph about gamers and PC cooperation. Returning to everyday use – both sports and movies look very good here. Thanks to the fast panel and well-functioning motion smoother, the C7K is perfect for watching matches, but also for movie screenings. In the menu, we will find two sliders – blur reduction and flicker reduction – which allow us to adjust the motion smoothness effect to our own preferences. At lower settings, we get a more cinematic effect, with slight frame motion. At higher settings – the image becomes more theatrical, smooth to the point of exaggeration. Everyone can set it to their liking.

Motion handling is definitely one of the Bravia 3 II's strongest points. The TV uses a 120 Hz VA panel, a solution that by nature, despite the high refresh rate, doesn't always cope well with motion blur. Here Sony has managed to get that problem very well under control. Fast-moving objects remain sharp, and the characteristic trails and blurring are reduced to a very low level, if not to zero. It's one of the least smearing LCD TVs we've had the chance to test. Interestingly, in this respect the Bravia 3 II can even outperform the much more expensive flagship True RGB series: the Bravia 9 II.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

8.1/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 120Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

TCL C7K is a TV that looks like the dream equipment for gamers on paper – and most importantly, it also performs well in practice. First, the good news: we have two HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth, so we can easily connect both a console and a computer, taking full advantage of their capabilities. The panel itself supports 144 Hz refresh rate, which provides a significant advantage in dynamic games. Additionally, it comes with a full package of gaming features: VRR (Variable Refresh Rate), ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode), and Dolby Vision support in games. There is also an HGiG mode, which allows for HDR effects that align with the creators' intentions. GameBar, which is an information bar for gamers. It operates quickly, looks clear (like a Nintendo console👌), and shows what’s most important: the current frame count, VRR status, and even HDR parameters.

Sony Bravia 3 II is a very good TV for gamers, although not everything has been handled the way we'd like. The biggest change concerns the connections. For the first time in a Sony TV we get four full HDMI 2.1 ports with 48 Gb/s bandwidth, thanks to the new MediaTek Pentonic 800 chipset. That removes one of the long-standing issues that has plagued the manufacturer's TVs. You can connect several devices at once and use each input's full capabilities, including VRR and ALLM. There's also a simple Game Bar that lets you check key signal parameters and change a few useful settings, such as black level, when you want to improve visibility in darker parts of a game.

There are, however, two limitations worth knowing. The first is the lack of support for 1440p at 120 Hz. This won't be a problem for everyone, but people using that resolution on a console or PC, for example to get higher frame rates in certain games, will have to choose 1080p. We have more reservations about HGiG support. Sony does not allow disabling tone mapping on the Bravia 3 II, so the TV continuously processes HDR content even when you would prefer to leave that task to the console. You can most easily notice this during HDR setup. The checkerboard pattern does not disappear at the point corresponding to the TV's actual capabilities. That doesn't mean HDR in games will look bad. You just need to approach the setup a bit differently and, instead of relying on the pattern, manually set the peak brightness to about 450 nits. The issue can be worked around, but you should know about it before you start configuring your console.

Input lag

9.7/10

9.9/10

SDR

1080p60
19 ms
14 ms
1080p120
11 ms
8 ms
2160p60
19 ms
14 ms
2160p120
11 ms
8 ms

HDR

2160p60
19 ms
14 ms
2160p120
10 ms
8 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
19 ms
14 ms
2160p120 DV
10 ms
8 ms

When it comes to delays, the C7K doesn't give any reasons to complain. In games at 120 Hz, the input lag is around 10 ms, which means the television responds really quickly. Interestingly, even in Dolby Vision mode, the result is very similar, which is not always the standard. Good job, TCL. At 60 Hz, the lag obviously increases a bit, but that is completely normal and applies to virtually any television with a refresh rate of 120Hz and higher. The most important thing is that everything still runs smoothly and there is no feeling that something is not responding to our actions.

In terms of input lag, the Bravia 3 II performs very well. With a 120 Hz signal the input lag is around 8 ms, while at 60 Hz it increases to about 14 ms, so in both cases the response to controls is very fast and during normal gaming you'd be hard-pressed to notice any delay. It's also a plus that the TV behaves well in Dolby Vision Gaming mode on Xbox. The input lag then remains practically just as low, and until recently Sony often had a noticeable problem with this.

Compatibility with PC

8.4/10

7.2/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Average
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
11ms
8ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
120Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

If we intend to connect the C7K to a computer – especially for gaming – there’s definitely something to play with. We have 4K at 144 Hz, which sounds great on its own, but if we drop the resolution, the TV can display even 280 Hz. In e-sports, where every fraction of a second counts, this makes a real difference. On top of that, there's support for G-Sync and FreeSync, so regardless of what graphics card we have – the image will be smooth, without any stuttering or tearing.

But if we plan to put the C7K on a desk and use it like a monitor, it’s a little less “rosy.” Sure, it supports chroma 4:4:4, so fonts should be sharp, but with very dark letters, there’s a slight blurring and dimming of the edges. It’s not something that immediately stands out during gaming or watching, but when working with text – it can be distracting. In everyday use – probably without concerns, but if we plan to place a 50-inch screen a meter from our face, it’s worth keeping this in mind.

Using it with a computer is generally good, although again not without a few reservations. The Bravia 3 II correctly supports 4:4:4 chroma, so in typical use text and the system UI look sharp and readable. However, gray fonts can draw attention, as their vertical edges are often noticeably brighter than the horizontal ones. On a larger screen that isn't particularly bothersome, but if you're considering the smaller Bravia 3 II as a monitor for working with text, it's worth keeping in mind. What bothers us more is the lack of additional higher-refresh-rate modes. It's not even about 144 or 165 Hz at 4K, but at least the option to get smoother motion at Full HD. This solution is appearing increasingly in competing TVs (DLG 240Hz), while Sony still doesn't offer it, even in its pricier models. For most users, 4K at 120 Hz will of course be perfectly adequate, especially for consoles, but people who also use the TV as a PC gaming monitor may be left wanting.

Viewing angles

3.2/10

3.3/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
75%
72%

There are no surprises here – the C7K has classic viewing angles for a VA panel. That is: sitting directly in front – it’s great. Colors look good, contrast is strong, everything is in place. But just shifting a little to the side and it starts to get worse – the image loses saturation, blacks turn gray, and the overall impression diminishes a bit. So if we plan to watch together with a few people or have a couch that takes up half the living room – it’s worth seating everyone more centrally. You can watch from the side, but don’t expect miracles – that’s just a characteristic of the VA panel.

The viewing angles are pretty typical for a VA panel — in other words, just average and for some probably even poor. The Bravia 3 II looks best when you’re sitting directly in front of the screen. As you move to the side, colors start to lose saturation and blacks become increasingly gray. Unfortunately, that’s the price you pay for this panel’s high native contrast. Watching with two or three people shouldn’t be much of an issue, but if the couch is wide, people sitting at its far edges will see a noticeably worse picture.

Daytime performance

6.1/10

5.8/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Panel brightness

SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2): 447 cd/m2

TCL C7K / QM7K 50": 475 cd/m2

Fortunately, the TCL C7K performs quite well in a bright room. The applied matrix has a satin finish that effectively reduces reflections, so even on a sunny day, we don't have to worry about reflections from lamps or windows. Importantly, the colors maintain their intensity and do not wash out, as can happen with weaker matte panels. When it comes to brightness itself, the average for content like YouTube or regular TV is slightly below 500 nits. This is not a record result – for example, the MQLED85 (C765) performs better in this regard. However, for everyday watching during the day, it should work without major issues, as long as we don't plan to place it opposite a south-facing window without curtains.

During the day the Bravia 3 II performs quite decently, although a lot depends on where you place the TV. The satin coating handles reflections reasonably well; it doesn't act like a mirror, but strong light sources, especially a window opposite the screen, can interfere with viewing. The VA panel is an advantage here, helping blacks retain fairly good depth in daylight so the image doesn't immediately turn gray or become washed out. The set can also reach about 450 nits of brightness and can maintain that level regardless of how many bright elements are on screen. That will be more than enough for a typical living room, and during the day the picture remains easy to see. If, however, the TV is to be placed in a very bright room with large windows and a lot of direct light, you can find models with a noticeably more effective coating and greater brightness headroom.

Panel details

Backlight Type
QLED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
V8.0012T01-LF1V531.002396
6140200730
Image processor
MT5896 2,5GB RAM
PENTONIC 800 4GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review TCL C7K / QM7K 50" TV Panel details
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV Panel details

TCL C7K / QM7K 50"

SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2)

TV features

7.3/10

7.9/10

  • System
    Google TV
    Google TV
  • System performance
    Good
    Good
  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 50" TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 50" TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 50" TV features
Review TCL C7K / QM7K 50" TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    Yes
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    No
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

SmartTV: GoogleTV

The greatest strength of the TCL C7K in everyday use is undoubtedly the Google TV system. Thanks to it, we have access to an almost endless library of apps, including more niche ones that are often unavailable on other platforms. The built-in Google Assistant understands Polish, so we can easily ask what's on TV, what the weather is like, and even give a few voice commands to control the television. It's also worth noting the presence of Chromecast and AirPlay, which work smoothly and make life easier.

Usability Features

On the downside, the classic features are somewhat lacking. Of course, we find the basics here – teletext, EPG, or the ability to connect headphones – but that's pretty much it. There's a lack of USB recording functionality or picture-in-picture (PiP) mode, which can sometimes still be found with the competition. It's also worth remembering that the Google TV implementation on TCL can sometimes have oddly translated menu sections or minor interface bugs. These are not issues that hinder everyday use, but detail-oriented individuals may notice them.

Smart TV Features: Google TV

The Bravia 3 II runs on Google TV and, in terms of capabilities, it’s one of the more feature-rich systems currently found in TVs. First and foremost, it offers access to a very large number of apps, so in addition to the most popular streaming platforms you’ll also find many less obvious services without much trouble. Sony also supports AirPlay and Chromecast, making it very convenient to cast content from a smartphone. Voice search also performs well, backed by Gemini, which handles commands in multiple languages and can genuinely make using the TV easier. However, during our tests we ran into one problem: the Bravia 3 II would not correctly receive a picture from a Windows 11 PC via Miracast. So if you want to use the TV as a secondary display for a computer, the safest solution is still a connection via HDMI.

Classic TV features

Sony also hasn’t forgotten users who still primarily use regular broadcast TV. The Bravia 3 II supports recording programs to USB, including the ability to schedule recordings via PVR, which is rare these days, especially in cheaper models. There is also teletext and a clear channel guide, so in terms of basic TV functions we really lacked nothing here, perhaps except for picture-in-picture (PiP). It’s notable that the set includes two remote controls. The first is modern and simplified (the non-backlit version), while the second is a classic design with a full numeric keypad. And although it may look a bit old-fashioned, viewers who watch a lot of traditional TV may actually find it more convenient, for example when entering channel numbers.

Apps

9.6/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.2/10

9.3/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
Yes
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the TCL C7K performs really well. It supports most popular audio and video formats, so if we want to quickly throw something from a USB drive and play it – there shouldn’t be any problem. Of course, as is usually the case, there are some minor shortcomings – not every exotic codec will work (Apple's HEIC), not all subtitles will be perfectly synchronized (txt.). However, this is where the biggest advantage of this TV comes in, which is Google TV. With access to the Google Play store, we can easily install an alternative player, like VLC, and then no file is intimidating to us.

The Bravia 3 II's built-in player works really well, and during our tests it handled most popular video and audio formats without any problems. There’s really nothing that would force us to install an extra player or use an external device. The only exception might be videos with subtitles saved in .txt format, which the TV does not support, but let’s be honest, at that point that would be nitpicking.

Sound

7/10

6.8/10

  • Maximum volume
    76dB
    87dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

To be honest, we didn't expect much from the sound in the 50-inch version of the C7K model. Usually, in such sizes, it's hard to get anything more than a thin, flat sound. But here – a pleasant surprise. The sound turned out to be really enjoyable, with good clarity and even a slightly perceptible bass. This is probably related to TCL's new collaboration with the Bang & Olufsen brand, which is new for 2025. Whether the C7K actually features original drivers from the Danish premium brand – we can't confirm. But the final effect is still deserving of a plus. For a TV without a soundbar – it sounds quite nice.

In terms of sound, the Bravia 3 II performs adequately, but there’s not much more to say. The speakers handle dialogue and regular TV well, but they clearly lack lower frequencies. Bass drops off quickly, so with music, action movies, or games the sound is fairly light and lacks punch. That’s not unusual for TVs in this class, but if you want a more impactful sound a soundbar is highly recommended. Supported audio formats are much better. The Bravia 3 II handles practically everything you might need, including Dolby TrueHD, DTS-HD Master Audio, and DTS:X, formats increasingly skipped by other manufacturers. The TV can also pass them through to an external audio setup. The exception is Dolby Atmos encoded in Dolby TrueHD, which the built-in speakers cannot reproduce directly, but when using a suitable soundbar or AV receiver this shouldn’t be a significant problem.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

76dBC (Max)

75dBC

87dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy