TCL C6K vs SHARP JP7765E

TCL C6K is a moderately bright TV that can showcase its full potential under the best cinematic conditions – the maximum brightness is around 600 nits. In scenes with large, intense light sources, the HDR effect can be really satisfying, providing a sense of cinematic brilliance. However, it should be noted that when managing the backlighting zones, there are situations where some elements become dimmed and sometimes can even become barely visible. It is clear that there is a lack of proper algorithm optimization here, although looking at the technical parameters in this price range, the design itself performs very well.

So how does the brightness of the Sharp JP7 perform in the most demanding titles? Honestly: at first, we were quite surprised. The television is capable of achieving over 1000 nits of brightness, which is an outstanding and rarely seen result for a device costing just under 2000 zł (for 55 inches). Watching bright, full-screen scenes, one can get the impression that we are dealing with truly good equipment. However, unfortunately, we must return to the problem we mentioned earlier regarding local dimming management. When small, bright elements appear on a dark background on the screen (like in the test scenes from Life of Pi or Sicario 2), it is noticeable how poorly the JP7 handles the zones. The television dims them almost to the maximum, stifling the whole HDR effect, which at such moments resembles a flat SDR image (less than 200 nits). This instability makes the image on the JP7 unfortunately lose its appeal in demanding, contrast-heavy films.

As a consolation, it is worth noting that the panel has the potential for good color display. A PFS (phosphor) filter has been implemented here, allowing the coverage of the DCI-P3 palette to reach a solid 94%. The manufacturer calls its product a “QLED,” even though it is mainly based technologically on the aforementioned PFS filter. Considering the recent market battles among manufacturers about what can and cannot be called QLED, we leave the issue of the correctness of this naming to your judgment. However, it remains a fact that the potential for reproducing saturated colors in this panel is simply good.

This year's TCL televisions feature a Filmmaker mode, and it must be admitted that it is definitely the best choice straight out of the box. This is the mode we recommend for everyday watching of movies and series. Unfortunately, as is often the case, the best doesn't mean perfect. In the case of SDR content, the image was too warm because the red was strongly emphasized in the white balance. On the other hand, with HDR content, we had the opposite impression – the image became cooler than it should have been due to excess blue. Additionally, the brightness characteristic sometimes led to highlights being blown out. In practice, this resulted in quite noticeable color test inaccuracies that are hard to accept in a mode advertised as "by the creators."

When it comes to out-of-the-box colors, the Sharp JP7 was tested in Film mode, which traditionally offers the most consistent image compared to the yellowed “Eco” mode or the glaring blue of the “Dynamic” mode. Although this is the best choice among the available settings, the results are still far from ideal. The white balance clearly lacked red and blue components, causing many scenes to take on an unnatural, greenish tint. Another issue was the gamma – during fullscreen scenes, the television provides too much brightness, completely stripping away its cinematic character. All of this translated into color reproduction errors, particularly with shades of gray, which exceeded Delta E 10. Just to remind: errors above 2-3 are already noticeable to the human eye, so here we are dealing with a significant distortion of reality.

In HDR mode, the situation is reversed but not any better. Here, the blue color dominates the white balance, giving the image an unnatural, almost “store-like” sharpness reminiscent of aggressive demo modes. Furthermore, the measurements of the EOTF curve emphasize the store-like nature of the image. The graph clearly shows that the television generates an image significantly brighter than the standards predict, resulting in an artificially boosted and unrealistic final effect. The Sharp JP7 is evidently trying to appear stronger than it actually is, but it does so at the expense of fidelity to the content.

Thanks to the white balance correction, it was possible to significantly reduce the C6K's tendency to distort colors, which resulted in a very good final outcome. After calibration, we will no longer observe the effect of excessive warming of scenes in SDR or overly cooling the image in HDR. However, it is worth taking a closer look at the brightness characteristics. In SDR content, there are few complaints – the image looks really good, especially in older movies, TV shows, or materials from YouTube. This is much worse for HDR content. Analysis of the EOTF curve suggests that everything is fine, but in practice (EOTF in films), the limitations of the construction become apparent. The TV tends to overly brighten the smallest parts of the frame, and in other situations, it can dim the entire scene too much. The effect of calibration is therefore evident, and in terms of color, the C6K has gained quite a lot, but certain limitations arising from local dimming and, in fact, its management by the C6K simply cannot be overcome.

We subjected the JP7 to our standard calibration procedure and truly... the television gained a new life thanks to it, especially in SDR content (YouTube, classic television, series, or older movies). Because we managed to accurately set the white balance and stabilize the gamma, color errors dropped to a value of below 3. This is a level at which the human eye has trouble detecting discrepancies. In this scenario, the Sharp JP7 delivers an image with really great color accuracy, which is a significant advantage in this price range. However, the content in HDR turned out to be much more problematic. Here, despite our efforts and adjustments to the settings, the television simply did not want to cooperate. In the JP7 menu, we cannot find any option that would allow for real control over brightness management (EOTF). Although a significant portion of color errors was reduced, the image still remained unnaturally oversaturated. It's a pity because the potential of the mini-LED backlit panel is large, but the software presents a clear barrier.

The conclusion is simple: when watching less demanding content (SDR) on the JP7, you can expect an image that is more than satisfactory, but in HDR, you have to come to terms with a certain degree of "artificiality" that cannot be overcome even with professional equipment.

The TCL C6K performs quite well in terms of scaling. Lower quality materials look acceptable, and the lack of overscan issues means that the image is displayed in full, without cropping. However, one cannot expect miracles – content of very low quality will not gain new life here, as the image processor has its limitations. On thin lines or details, the characteristic tearing is visible, which reveals the absence of advanced image enhancement algorithms. It is also a pity that the C6K lacks the feature for smoothing tonal transitions – in older films or video materials, color banding can be noticeable and may be bothersome during long viewing sessions.

When it comes to lower quality materials and how the Sharp JP7 handles them, the situation is ambiguous. Let's start with the upscaling – here we have no major objections. The process of scaling the image to a higher resolution is correct; the image remains readable and clear, without the overscan effect or cropped edges. Of course, this is not at the level of top models and at times one can notice slight jaggedness on the contours, but in this price range, the effect is fully acceptable.

However, the digital image processing itself is significantly worse, as aside from the scaling, it virtually does not exist. In the JP7 menu, we won't find any option that would effectively smooth out unwanted tonal transitions or reduce noise in the image. As a result, the signal reaches the matrix in a very raw form, which, with heavily compressed materials (e.g., from YouTube), leads to visible posterization. Either this is a flaw in the software or a very strange design decision, as in earlier Sharp models, this feature was available and, more importantly, worked with noticeable effect. Here we are left at the mercy of what the source provides, without any digital support from the image processor.

TCL C6K features a 144 Hz panel, which is a significant advantage in this price range. This is an important step forward compared to the previous model C655 PRO, which offered only 60 Hz at 4K. The difference is especially noticeable when watching sports or playing games – the ball, athletes, or fast action in a game are displayed more clearly and without losing details. An interesting fact is also the ability of the panel to operate at 240 Hz, which the manufacturer does not mention in official materials. We will return to this topic when discussing the game mode for PC.

TCL also added a feature for movie watchers: "Motion Clarity," which allows you to adjust the image to your preferences using two simple sliders. You can keep the movie frame visible or opt for a very smooth, almost theatrical effect. This way, everyone can find settings tailored to their taste.

The motion fluidity on the Sharp JP7 is very mediocre, and the reason is simple: the television uses a 60Hz panel. This immediately makes it difficult to recommend for watching sports or serious gaming, where higher refresh rates are already the standard. The only real plus is the presence of a motion smoother, which we can control in movies using a slider called De-judder. Lower settings produce a more raw, "cinematic" (frame-based) image, while higher settings add artificial fluidity. We suggest setting it somewhere in the middle of the scale, that is, in the 3-5 range – this is the best compromise to avoid the soap opera effect while getting rid of the tiring image stutter. Interestingly, in the menu, we also find a slider for "motion blur reduction," which usually suggests the presence of a 120Hz panel. However, in the case of the JP7, it does not contribute anything to the image and serves more as a placeholder – it is meant to look good in the settings, but technically it should not function on this panel.

The TCL C6K is a TV that can confidently be called equipment designed for gamers. Here we have 4K at 144 Hz, VRR support, automatic game mode (ALLM), and Dolby Vision Gaming. Additionally, there's a practical Game Bar, a panel with the most important settings readily available – useful when we want to quickly change something during gameplay (e.g., screen aspect ratio: Yes, that’s possible!). The wide VRR range, reaching up to 240 Hz, deserves attention. However, this is mainly an option for PC gamers who drop below the native 4K resolution. Then the TV can spread its wings and show additional smoothness, especially in fast-paced e-sports titles. In the case of consoles, we stick to the classic limit of 120 Hz, but the possibilities are still quite broad. The only drawback is a slight ghosting that can sometimes be seen in dynamic scenes. Other than that, the C6K offers everything gamers expect from a TV.

As we mentioned earlier, the 60Hz panel is not a feature that will attract gamers to the Sharp JP7. Perhaps for the casual gamer, whose console generates most titles at 60 frames per second, there might be something interesting? When it comes to specific additions, we find:

• ALLM Mode: Automatically switches the TV to low latency game mode (input lag).

• Game Menu: Which is hard to call a full-fledged “Game Bar,” as its functionality is minimal. Besides enabling ALLM, there is only a smoothness enhancer dedicated to games, which we recommend against because it introduces very noticeable artifacts and spoils the responsiveness.

• Dolby Vision Gaming: For Microsoft's consoles.

Unfortunately, the list of shortcomings is much longer and more painful than the positives. The biggest disappointment is the lack of support for 120Hz, even when lowering the resolution to Full HD. The presence of 120Hz would allow for performance modes to be activated in many games on PS5 or Xbox Series X. Another absence is VRR, which means that during frame drops, we are susceptible to image tearing. The lack of proper implementation of the HGiG standard is also very problematic. This results in the fact that during HDR calibration in the console menu, it is very easy to “overshoot” the brightness settings. As a result, instead of clear details in highlights, we end up with an unnaturally over-brightened image with cut-off details. The Sharp JP7 is a proposal only for very casual gamers.