TCL C6K vs Samsung Q7F

TCL C6K is a moderately bright TV that can showcase its full potential under the best cinematic conditions – the maximum brightness is around 600 nits. In scenes with large, intense light sources, the HDR effect can be really satisfying, providing a sense of cinematic brilliance. However, it should be noted that when managing the backlighting zones, there are situations where some elements become dimmed and sometimes can even become barely visible. It is clear that there is a lack of proper algorithm optimization here, although looking at the technical parameters in this price range, the design itself performs very well.

Unfortunately, the Samsung Q7F is not one of the bright televisions, and this directly affects the quality of HDR movies. The peak brightness of the panel is only about 250 nits, which is definitely too low to speak of true cinematic experiences. In practice, the image in HDR content does not differ significantly from classic SDR, making it hard to talk about any "wow effect" that usually accompanies us while watching such films. During testing movie scenes, the image simply looked dim, and brightness almost invariably hovered around the mentioned 250 nits. The worst performance was observed in shots with small, intensely glowing elements – the applied global dimming technique reacted very aggressively, dimming the entire screen to maintain the black effect. On the plus side, it is worth noting the presence of a QLED coating that expands the color palette. As a budget QLED model, the Q7F performs quite decently here: its DCI-P3 color coverage is about 93%, and BT.2020 reaches 70%. This means that colors, despite the low brightness, can look quite vivid and attractive.

This year's TCL televisions feature a Filmmaker mode, and it must be admitted that it is definitely the best choice straight out of the box. This is the mode we recommend for everyday watching of movies and series. Unfortunately, as is often the case, the best doesn't mean perfect. In the case of SDR content, the image was too warm because the red was strongly emphasized in the white balance. On the other hand, with HDR content, we had the opposite impression – the image became cooler than it should have been due to excess blue. Additionally, the brightness characteristic sometimes led to highlights being blown out. In practice, this resulted in quite noticeable color test inaccuracies that are hard to accept in a mode advertised as "by the creators."

The factory color reproduction in the Samsung Q7F definitely isn't one of its strong points. In Filmmaker mode, which theoretically should be closest to neutral, the white balance issue is immediately noticeable. There's too much red on the screen, while blue is noticeably lacking. The effects of this are very easy to see – white, instead of being neutral, takes on warm, almost slightly orange tones. Over time, this makes the entire image look somewhat unnatural, and bright areas of the scene can seem unrealistic. The problems become even more apparent in HDR content. The graphs show that the TV has significant errors in the Color Checker palette, which translates to visible inaccuracies in the real image. In practice, this means that colors are not presented as they should be. The Q7F also heavily manipulates brightness; darker elements are overly boosted, causing them to lose their cinematic feel, while bright parts can appear dimmed. As a result, the image seems flattened, and instead of helping to bring out details, contrast only highlights its own limitations. This is particularly frustrating in HDR materials, as every detail matters there. In scenes where a subtle play of light and shadow should be felt, the Q7F either overdoes the brightening or, conversely, suppresses elements that were meant to draw the eye. This causes the image to lose its depth, and instead of cinematic realism, we get more of a simplification effect.

Thanks to the white balance correction, it was possible to significantly reduce the C6K's tendency to distort colors, which resulted in a very good final outcome. After calibration, we will no longer observe the effect of excessive warming of scenes in SDR or overly cooling the image in HDR. However, it is worth taking a closer look at the brightness characteristics. In SDR content, there are few complaints – the image looks really good, especially in older movies, TV shows, or materials from YouTube. This is much worse for HDR content. Analysis of the EOTF curve suggests that everything is fine, but in practice (EOTF in films), the limitations of the construction become apparent. The TV tends to overly brighten the smallest parts of the frame, and in other situations, it can dim the entire scene too much. The effect of calibration is therefore evident, and in terms of color, the C6K has gained quite a lot, but certain limitations arising from local dimming and, in fact, its management by the C6K simply cannot be overcome.

After professional calibration, we managed to bring the Q7F in order – at least in terms of SDR content. The picture in this mode looks really good: the white balance has been set correctly, the colors appear natural, and errors in the color palette have dropped to values that are practically invisible to the eye. The gamma behaves excellently, and the only minor drawback is a slight brightening of smaller elements, which results from the lack of local dimming. For everyday TV watching or standard quality films, the Q7F performs surprisingly well.

It was much more difficult to tame HDR content. Despite adjusting the white balance, the television continues to manipulate brightness significantly, causing scenes to sometimes look unnatural – what was meant to be subtly darker can end up being overly brightened, and bright parts of the image sometimes appear dull. The final effect is better than in the factory settings, but it is evident that the design limitations of the Q7F do not allow for fully utilizing the potential of HDR materials.

The TCL C6K performs quite well in terms of scaling. Lower quality materials look acceptable, and the lack of overscan issues means that the image is displayed in full, without cropping. However, one cannot expect miracles – content of very low quality will not gain new life here, as the image processor has its limitations. On thin lines or details, the characteristic tearing is visible, which reveals the absence of advanced image enhancement algorithms. It is also a pity that the C6K lacks the feature for smoothing tonal transitions – in older films or video materials, color banding can be noticeable and may be bothersome during long viewing sessions.

Upscaling and digital image processing in the Q7F is a bit of a sine wave. On one hand, we have really nice upscaling – weaker sources look better than one might expect. The image becomes clearer, sharper, and even older movies or terrestrial TV hold up well. Samsung has been strong in this area for years, and the Q7F confirms that. On the other hand… things start to get tricky. The TV has a problem with overscan – part of the image is simply cut off, and it looks rather unrefined. Additionally, we were let down by a feature called "noise reduction," which should improve the smoothness of tonal transitions in weaker materials. In other Samsungs, it works relatively well, but here it practically makes no difference – the banding in gradients remains. It's a bit disappointing because we could have expected more from a model that is aimed at users looking for a display for SDR content.

TCL C6K features a 144 Hz panel, which is a significant advantage in this price range. This is an important step forward compared to the previous model C655 PRO, which offered only 60 Hz at 4K. The difference is especially noticeable when watching sports or playing games – the ball, athletes, or fast action in a game are displayed more clearly and without losing details. An interesting fact is also the ability of the panel to operate at 240 Hz, which the manufacturer does not mention in official materials. We will return to this topic when discussing the game mode for PC.

TCL also added a feature for movie watchers: "Motion Clarity," which allows you to adjust the image to your preferences using two simple sliders. You can keep the movie frame visible or opt for a very smooth, almost theatrical effect. This way, everyone can find settings tailored to their taste.

Motion blur and motion fluidity in the Q7F is probably the most budget-conscious element of this TV. The 60 Hz panel is noticeable, with blur being quite evident, especially in dynamic scenes, and it's rather difficult to consider this model as equipment designed for watching sports or playing fast-paced games. In tests with the little green man, there was a long tail, and the ball in a football match would leave trails behind it.

On the plus side, the presence of motion smoothing is commendable. It really makes a difference in movies - especially since most materials are recorded at 24 frames. Here we can decide for ourselves whether we prefer a more "cinematic" image, with the slight jerkiness characteristic of cinema, or a smoother, more "television-like" one. This actually works quite well and helps improve the viewing comfort for series or movies.

The TCL C6K is a TV that can confidently be called equipment designed for gamers. Here we have 4K at 144 Hz, VRR support, automatic game mode (ALLM), and Dolby Vision Gaming. Additionally, there's a practical Game Bar, a panel with the most important settings readily available – useful when we want to quickly change something during gameplay (e.g., screen aspect ratio: Yes, that’s possible!). The wide VRR range, reaching up to 240 Hz, deserves attention. However, this is mainly an option for PC gamers who drop below the native 4K resolution. Then the TV can spread its wings and show additional smoothness, especially in fast-paced e-sports titles. In the case of consoles, we stick to the classic limit of 120 Hz, but the possibilities are still quite broad. The only drawback is a slight ghosting that can sometimes be seen in dynamic scenes. Other than that, the C6K offers everything gamers expect from a TV.

Features for gamers in the Samsung Q7F is a topic that evokes quite a bit of mixed emotions. On one hand – no sensible person expected miracles here, after all, it's a 60 Hz television, and it was clear from the beginning that it wouldn't be a device to extract the maximum from a console or PC. On the other hand, since the manufacturer promised specific solutions in promotional materials, it's natural that we wanted to see them in practice. At the start, it's quite decent. The automatic game mode (ALLM) works, so there's no need to manually fiddle with the settings; the console switches the TV to low latency mode by itself. Additionally, we have the Game Bar, which looks impressive and allows you to check a few basic parameters without leaving the game. And this is where the good news ends.

The biggest problem with the Q7F is VRR, or rather its absence. Indeed, a relevant icon appears in the menu, and you can even see it in the Game Bar, but throughout the entire test, the function remained dead and could not be activated in any way. The issue with HGiG is even more painful; this option was actually available at the beginning, but after a software update, it disappeared completely, which is simply unprofessional. Therefore, the Q7F is only suitable for absolute basics. Sure, you can turn on the console, play more mellow titles, and enjoy low input lag, but if someone is counting on more advanced features that the manufacturer promised, they will be disappointed. This is not a television intended for gaming, and it's better to be aware of this before purchasing.