Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) vs Philips OLED811

Direct comparison

BRAVIA 3 / K-(XX)S3

Info

OLED801 / OLED811

Info

Available screen sizes: 50”

Available screen sizes: 48”55”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.2

8.1

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.3

    8.5

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.3

    8.7

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.4

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    6.6

    8.9

  • TV as a computer monitor

    3.5

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    5.4

    6.0

  • Utility functions

    6.1

    7.9

  • Apps

    9.6

    7.7

  • Sound quality

    6.5

    7.6

Advantages

  • Significantly better contrast and deeper blacks than the IPS variant

  • Higher screen brightness, which improves viewing comfort during the day

  • More uniform panel, fewer issues with vignetting and lightening

  • Smooth tonal transitions, especially in bright scenes

  • Wide color gamut coverage (over 91% DCI-P3)

  • Effective upscaling of lower quality materials

  • Dolby Vision support, which partially enhances the experience of HDR content

  • Google TV system with a large app library

  • Two remotes included – classic and minimalist

  • Three-sided Ambilight that creates a great atmosphere while watching

  • Perfect blacks and outstanding contrast from the OLED panel

  • Strong HDR effect. Brightness around 1500 nits

  • Very good viewing angles

  • Excellent motion clarity (no motion blur)

  • Supports 4K at 165 Hz

  • Four HDMI 2.1 ports

  • Extensive features for gamers

  • Support for multiple audio/video formats (Dolby Vision, Dolby Atmos, HDR10+, DTS)

Disadvantages

No like
  • A lot worse viewing angles than in the version with the IPS panel

  • Collaboration with PC clearly weaker: worse font readability and visible dithering

  • Occasional system freezes on Google TV

  • Missing USB recording feature

  • Titan OS has a more limited app library compared with Google TV and other competitors

  • An infrared remote that requires pointing at the TV (sometimes responds slowly)

  • Very high input lag in games with Dolby Vision

  • Visible posterization (mainly in bright scenes)

  • Underused image processing capabilities of the Pentonic 800

Our verdict

Sony Bravia 3 in the VA panel variant is a television that remains the same budget model in character, but the change in panel type makes watching movies and series much more enjoyable. Higher contrast and deeper blacks finally allow for viewing in the evening without the impression that the screen is drowning in shades of gray. This is a significant advantage over the IPS version, even if it comes at the cost of much worse viewing angles. In practice, this comes down to a choice – if we watch mainly from a couch positioned directly in front, the VA panel gives a decidedly better effect. The rest of the image remains largely the same. The PFS filter still provides pleasantly saturated colors, and the upscaling is at a good level, ensuring that SDR content looks clean and aesthetic. The Google TV system, although it doesn’t always work perfectly smoothly, remains a huge asset – access to a broad library of applications and streaming platforms is something that competitors in this price range don’t always offer in such a refined form. At the same time, the Bravia 3 with VA does not solve all the issues of its predecessor. HDR brightness at around 350 nits still does not allow for a true high dynamic effect, and the lack of local dimming means that fine details can still be blown out. Additionally, there’s no USB recording, which was present in the predecessor. So, who is the Bravia 3 in the VA version for? For those who want to enter the world of Sony televisions at a lower cost and care about decent quality in films and series, primarily watching lower-quality content. It is not a proposition for gamers or for someone expecting cinematic HDR effects. As with the IPS version, it’s hard to talk about a bargain – even if it is the "cheapest Sony of 2025," it is still more expensive than competitors who can offer Mini-LEDs with significantly better contrast and brightness at the same price. Therefore, it is worth considering this model primarily when we come across an attractive promotion.

The Philips OLED811 is a mid-range OLED TV for 2026 that stands out from its biggest rivals primarily because of one feature: Ambilight. By projecting light that follows the on-screen action onto the wall behind the TV, Ambilight can transform the atmosphere of an entire viewing session. In the evening, the picture seems to extend beyond the edges of the screen, making everything you watch feel that little bit more special. For some, it will simply be a nice extra; for others, it will be reason enough to choose a Philips TV once again.

Picture quality is very similar to what you get from models such as the LG C6 or Samsung S90H, at least in versions using the same type of panel. You can therefore expect deep, perfect blacks that make bright highlights look particularly impressive. The OLED811 is capable of delivering impactful HDR, and importantly, once calibrated, its picture comes close to reference quality. It does not have a major advantage over its competitors in this respect, but choosing Philips for Ambilight does not mean sacrificing picture quality either.

Gamers will also find several worthwhile improvements over last year’s model. Thanks to the MediaTek Pentonic 800 chipset, the TV finally offers four HDMI 2.1 ports. This means that connecting several devices—such as consoles, a PC and a soundbar—no longer forces you to decide which one gets access to the full capabilities of the interface. Gaming itself is highly enjoyable: the TV responds quickly, supports variable refresh rates and allows PC users to play in 4K at up to 165 Hz. It is only a shame that the new processor’s capabilities have not been put to equally good use when handling lower-quality content.

The operating system, however, raises the most concerns. Titan OS has replaced the well-liked Google TV platform, and although it has clearly improved over the past year, it is still difficult to see the change as a positive one. Admittedly, the system now runs more smoothly, offers more useful features and includes most popular streaming services in its app library. Nevertheless, the selection of apps remains far more limited than on Google TV and competing platforms. In our view, this is still the OLED811’s biggest weakness. The difference will be particularly noticeable to viewers who use less mainstream services.

Is it worth buying? Yes—provided that Titan OS meets your needs. In terms of picture quality and gaming features, the OLED811 offers just as much as its competitors, while Ambilight gives it something no rival can match. Philips therefore gives with one hand and takes with the other: it adds a uniquely immersive viewing atmosphere but limits your freedom when it comes to choosing apps. If all the services you use are available, this may well be a compromise worth making.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Good
Stand type
stand-type-
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Base adjustment
Swivel
Accessories
Two remote controls, Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.7/10

10/10

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,550:1

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,250:1

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,050:1

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,000:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The biggest difference in the 50-inch variant is the way Bravia 3 handles contrast. Although the television is not equipped with a local dimming system, simply changing the type of panel to VA provides a noticeable effect. The contrast is definitely higher than in the other sizes based on IPS panels, and the blacks no longer resemble washed-out shades of gray or navy. As a result, much more detail is visible in darker parts of the image, making evening viewing simply more enjoyable. It's still not at the level of more expensive Sony models, but the difference compared to the other variants of Bravia 3 is clear and easily noticeable after a short viewing session.

Black level and contrast are areas where the Philips OLED811 showcases all the strengths of OLED technology. Each pixel lights independently and can be turned completely off, so black is simply black. No gray halo or blooming around bright objects. In evening viewing this delivers a great effect: stars in the night sky, city lights, and text on dark backgrounds remain clearly separated from perfectly black surroundings.

So you shouldn't expect improvements here compared with other OLEDs, because in terms of black depth and contrast the result is already exemplary. The OLED811 doesn't need local dimming or any compromise between the brightness of a small object and the black around it. Even a single bright point can sit next to a completely switched-off pixel, giving the picture outstanding depth.

This is exactly where the advantage over Mini LED TVs becomes apparent in scenes with lots of black. Even the most advanced local dimming systems control larger areas of the image, so in demanding shots they can produce a halo around bright elements or dim them to preserve a dark background. The Philips OLED811 doesn't have that problem.

HDR effect quality

4.9/10

7.6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 91.9%, Bt.2020: 67.3%
DCI P3: 99.0%, Bt.2020: 74.5%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

319 nit

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

360 nit

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

393 nit

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

365 nit

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

395 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1225 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1310 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1443 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1368 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

626 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips OLED811

Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA)

Luminance of RGB colors

Interestingly, in the 50-inch version, the Bravia 3 performs slightly better in terms of brightness than its larger variants. In measurements, it achieved around 370 nits, which still aren't values that can compete with top-end televisions, but enough to speak of a semblance of HDR effect. For some users, this level will be acceptable, while others will view it as typical for SDR content, where spectacular bursts or strong contrasts are not expected. It must be clearly stated that the Bravia 3 is not a television for those who want to extract maximum quality from the most challenging film materials.

However, this does not mean that everything is mediocre. Sony equipped this model with an additional PFS filter, which works similarly to solutions used in QLED televisions. As a result, the coverage of the DCI-P3 color palette increased to over 91 percent. In everyday use, this means livelier, more saturated colors and a more pleasing image texture. Even if strong lighting effects are lacking, movies and series can look significantly more attractive than in its predecessor, the X75WL.

Philips OLED811 uses the new generation WOLED EX panels, also found in models like the LG C6 and Samsung S90H. After calibration we measured around 1500 nits, which is a very good result for an OLED TV. You can see it clearly in movies and series. All kinds of light flashes have the right intensity, especially when they appear on a dark background. In such scenes the OLED811 can deliver truly impressive HDR. Of course, that doesn't mean you'll see that peak brightness in every shot. When the screen is filled with a large area of white or a big explosion, brightness falls to around 600 nits. That's still a good result, but those scenes no longer have the same punch as small, bright elements on a dark background. This is a known limitation of OLEDs, and the OLED811 is no exception.

Colors

Aside from HDR brightness, colors also matter, and Philips performs very well here too. It covers almost the entire DCI-P3 gamut, which contains most of the colors used in HDR movies and series. So you get rich reds and lush greens, and while watching it's hard to find major faults in this area. It looks a bit worse with the much wider BT.2020 gamut — its most saturated shades are already beyond the reach of this panel. Added to that is the issue of the white subpixel the WOLED panel uses to help boost brightness. With very bright colors you can see some "whitening": the color is bright but loses some of its saturation. In exactly these situations QD-OLED panels from Samsung Display have the advantage. In most movies and series, however, this won't be something that immediately stands out.

Factory color reproduction

5.8/10

7.8/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

We primarily tested the Sony Bravia 3 in movie mode, which immediately proved to be the best choice among the factory settings. It's not a perfect picture, but compared to eco mode, which the TV suggests right out of the box, the difference is clear and positive. In movie mode, one can notice a certain problem: the picture seems too warm, which results from a lack of blue in the white balance. Despite this, in SDR content, the final effect can still be considered quite decent and satisfactory for everyday viewing. Much more serious errors appear in HDR materials. The Color Checker analysis showed significant deviations, and poor brightness management, combined with limited color gamut coverage, further exposes the shortcomings of the picture in this mode. All this makes HDR on the Bravia 3 look unconvincing and can spoil the impression left by the quite decent SDR content settings. Fortunately, this is not a hopeless situation. All sorts of errors can be somewhat mitigated, and some can even be completely corrected through professional calibration. That’s why we decided to see how the TV would perform after such adjustments.

The movie mode on the Philips OLED811 is sensibly configured right out of the box. Most color errors are minor, both in SDR and HDR, so you can sit down and watch without first adjusting the settings. There are no major inaccuracies that would immediately pull attention away from the film.

It's not perfect, though. The white balance shows a slight deficiency of red compared with green, so whites and grays can have a faint greenish tint. It's not a strong cast, but measurements clearly show it. There are also small brightness deviations in SDR: some areas of the picture are slightly lifted, and the deepest blacks aren't always rendered evenly. In HDR the TV tracks the reference much more closely, although in places it slightly pulls details out of the shadows. These are generally things to refine. The factory movie mode provides a good starting point, and calibration will show how much more you can get out of it.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.5/10

9.3/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The calibration allowed us to extract significantly more from the Bravia 3 than we could have expected at the beginning. Most importantly, we managed to address the deficiency of blue, which previously caused a noticeable warming of the image. After a slight adjustment in the white balance, most of the errors in the Color Checker measurements for SDR content practically disappeared. The shades of white gained naturalness, and the brightness management in gamma stabilized to a level nearly ideal, not exceeding the threshold of human eye perception. One can therefore confidently say that in SDR content, after a few adjustments in settings, the Bravia 3 performs really impressively. Much worse, though still definitely better than before calibration, is its performance with HDR content. The white balance has been brought under control, but the limitations of the IPS panel are insurmountable. The lack of local dimming means that even the smallest elements can be overexposed, which is immediately noticeable. Color-wise, the effect is also improved, although far from perfect – many errors still exceed four, or even five delta E units, meaning they remain visible to the human eye. It was already clear that the Bravia 3 is not a television designed to impress with HDR quality. Nevertheless, it is gratifying that in SDR content, after calibration, the image can look truly great, and in this category, the television surprised us positively.

After calibration the Philips OLED811 produces an image very close to the reference. We managed to even out the white balance and remove the subtle color cast visible in the factory settings. Errors in Color Checker measurements for SDR and HDR dropped to around 1 to 2, and many samples even fall below 1. That's a level at which it's hard to spot differences from the reference image with the naked eye. We also improved the gamma, and only in the brightest whites a slight brightening remains. In HDR the EOTF curve also stays close to the reference, although the TV still tends to slightly boost the brightness of small elements like stars or subtitles. That gives the image a bit of extra glow that shouldn't be there, but otherwise there's little to complain about. It was already good out of the box, and after calibration we managed to refine most of the remaining shortcomings.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.1/10

7.5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

In terms of the fluidity of tonal transitions, the impressions from the Bravia 3 with a VA panel are very similar to what we saw in the IPS variant; however, there is one crucial factor here – screen uniformity. The VA panel performs significantly better at maintaining image consistency, which immediately translates into a higher rating. This was most noticeable in scenes from the movie Green Knight. In the IPS version, strong brightening and vignetting practically made it impossible to assess the gradation itself, whereas in the 50-inch variant, this problem was greatly reduced. As for the tonal transitions themselves, the TV presents itself really well. In bright parts of the image, we did not notice any serious errors – colors combine smoothly, without creating artificial contours. In darker scenes, there are also no major issues with color gradation, and thanks to the more even backlighting, the image is much more pleasant to view than in the IPS panel version. So, one can say that this is one of those categories where the Bravia 3 in the 50-inch edition performs surprisingly well.

Compared with Philips’ previous OLEDs, the smoothness of tonal transitions has clearly improved. The biggest difference is visible in the dark parts of the image, which can give WOLED panels a lot of trouble. On the OLED811 they have been smoothed out very well; tones transition smoothly from one to another without obvious banding or visible steps. That’s a big plus, especially when watching dark scenes. Unfortunately, it’s not as good in brighter scenes. This is where we have the biggest reservations: instead of smooth transitions between tones you can sometimes see distinct boundaries, a posterization effect. It can be noticeable, and it’s a shame that the improvement seen in dark scenes didn’t extend to the bright areas to the same degree.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7/10

6.8/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Bravia 3 brings something more to the Sony TV family than just a common name. It stands out primarily for its ability to enhance the quality of weaker materials thanks to the processor used. Of course, we won't find the advanced XR chip known from more expensive models here, but still, it must be admitted that the image at lower resolutions looked surprisingly good. The upscaling worked effectively, and most parts of the screen were free from the typical excessive edge jaggedness found in budget constructions. The feature that improves the fluidity of tonal transitions is also noteworthy. In the high setting, it works really well, effectively masking gradation imperfections without significant loss of detail. It does happen that the algorithm overly smooths elements that should remain sharp - for example, faces - however, in general, the effect is beneficial. The best results were achieved precisely at the highest setting, and this option could be recommended to people watching lower quality content.

The OLED811 handles lower-quality content reasonably well, though it's far from perfect. The "Artifact Reduction" feature helps smooth tonal transitions and on the low setting delivers a pretty good result. It doesn't remove banding between shades as effectively as similar solutions from some competitors, but at least it doesn't introduce new artifacts. That's a sensible setting for everyday viewing. Still, there's some disappointment, because the MediaTek Pentonic 800 chip used here can, in other manufacturers' implementations, deal more effectively with heavy compression even at similarly low settings. A lot therefore depends on how each manufacturer uses its capabilities. We have a few more reservations about the 4K upscaling itself. There is plenty of detail, but the overall image looks fairly soft. Edges are heavily smoothed, which robs the picture of some sharpness and clarity. You can partly correct that with the sharpness slider in the menu, though that will just emphasize outlines rather than recover detail. On the plus side, there is no overscan, so even with an SD signal the TV does not crop the edges of the picture.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.8/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
165Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
26%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur ():

Blur (4K@165Hz ):

The fluidity of motion has never been a strong point of televisions equipped with 60 Hz panels, and the Bravia 3 is no exception. Nevertheless, Sony has added something that may appeal to those who are more sensitive to the way images are displayed. We are talking about the proprietary motion smoother, Motion Flow, which gives users a lot of adjustment options. Thanks to it, the image can become smoother, almost theatrical, or you can stick with a more cinematic style characterized by the jaggedness that many people simply associate with the filmic atmosphere. These features work for content with lower frame rates, such as movies and series recorded at 24 or 30 frames per second, which are the materials we encounter every day. This is where the motion smoother proves to be one of the most important features in everyday use of the television, and here the Bravia 3 performs really well.

In terms of motion handling, the OLED811 performs excellently. At 120 Hz, which is useful for console gaming and watching sports, the image stays clear and moving objects don’t leave noticeable trails. The fast response of OLED pixels helps here; you can see it clearly in the UFO test, even on dark backgrounds. There are also motion-smoothing controls. For movies you can adjust the strength of smoothing to your taste, ranging from preserving a cinematic feel to much smoother motion. A separate motion blur reduction control is useful for fast-paced content like live sports broadcasts.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4/10

9.5/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    No
    Yes
  • VRR range
    No
    48 - 165Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Warning Yes, high input lag
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Bravia 3 is not equipment for e-sports players or fans of late-night marathons with a controller in hand. The lack of 120 Hz refresh rate and HDMI 2.1 ports closes the topic before it even gets a chance to develop. This is a television for a casual gamer who will play FIFA or racing games after work, not for someone who measures every frame in a spreadsheet. Nevertheless, Sony has added a few nice extras to make it feel less bare. ALLM works as it should, automatically switching the television to game mode (low latency). There's even a simple Game Bar that is clear. However, the biggest curiosity here is the PlayStation Portal app. Thanks to it, you can launch games from PS5 wirelessly and see them immediately on the television screen. It sounds great, but it only takes a few minutes to feel significant lag. In our opinion, it's more of a showcase of capabilities than something you can reliably use every day. If someone really wants to play, it's better to connect the console with an HDMI cable and forget about wireless issues.

OLED811 has almost everything you could expect from a gaming TV. It supports 120 Hz at Full HD, 1440p and 4K resolutions, and when connected to a PC can reach 165 Hz. It also has VRR, which helps avoid screen tearing with variable frame rates, and ALLM, which automatically switches to game mode. So you don't have to dig into the settings every time you power up your console.

HGiG also works correctly, so once you enable HDR on the console the TV doesn't apply its own brightness adjustments. There's also a Game Bar that lets you check signal parameters and quickly change settings useful while gaming. The list even includes Dolby Vision for games, but there's a significant catch, which you'll read about below.

Input lag

10/10

8.8/10

SDR

1080p60
12 ms
14 ms
1080p120
5 ms
2160p60
12 ms
14 ms
2160p120
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
11 ms
14 ms
2160p120
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
12 ms
157 ms
2160p120 DV
57 ms

Here, Bravia 3 shows its best side. Latencies drop below 12 milliseconds in almost every resolution and mode, so the response to controller movements is instantaneous, and there is no noticeable delay. It feels like the console and the TV are speaking the same language, without unnecessary pauses and hesitations. Special attention should be given to the Dolby Vision Gaming mode. In its predecessor, the X75WL model, using this feature was simply agonizing – input lag could exceed 100 milliseconds, which effectively took away the pleasure of gaming. In Bravia 3, this problem has been completely eliminated.

OLED811 responds instantly. We measured 14 ms at 60 Hz and just 5 ms at 120 Hz, both in Full HD and 4K. Those are excellent results that let you comfortably play even fast-paced online titles. Unfortunately, enabling Dolby Vision changes things dramatically: at 60 Hz latency rises to 157 ms, and at 120 Hz it’s 57 ms. The first value in particular already means a clearly noticeable delay between input on the controller and the on-screen response. For gaming it’s definitely better to stick with HDR10.

Compatibility with PC

3.5/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
12ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGWB
Max refresh rate
60Hz
165Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Collaboration with a computer in the case of Bravia 3 with a VA panel does not perform as well as in the version with an IPS panel. The fonts are noticeably less sharp and harder to read, which is immediately apparent when working with text. To this, there is the surprising issue of dithering, which we did not notice in the IPS variant. This is quite an unusual situation, but definitely worth noting, as it may hinder those planning to use the television as a monitor. When it comes to PC gaming, there are also no major reasons for enthusiasm here. The lack of support for frame synchronization with graphics cards or higher refresh rates makes the screen rather unattractive in this role. Therefore, if someone is seriously considering connecting Bravia 3 to a computer, a better choice would be the variant with an IPS panel, which performs significantly better in this regard.

Philips OLED811 works very well with a computer. The manufacturer finally managed to correctly implement 4:4:4 chroma even at maximum resolution and refresh rate. That means small text and colored outlines are legible, without blurring or the rainbow fringing that results from loss of color information. Dark text on dark backgrounds also performs well, which TVs can struggle with. There are still minor imperfections related to the RGWB subpixel layout. Fonts aren't as sharp as on a classic RGB monitor, and with white letters you can see subtle red outlines up close. From a normal viewing distance you hardly notice it, though sitting close to the screen at a desk makes it easier to spot.

The most fun, though, is PC gaming. The combination of 4K at 165 Hz, working G-Sync, and input lag around 5 ms makes the OLED811 excellent for that. If you have a computer that can take advantage of that refresh rate, it's definitely worth hooking it up to the Philips TV.

Viewing angles

3.2/10

7.8/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
73%
32%

The viewing angles in Bravia 3 with VA matrix are clearly weaker than in the version with IPS panel. It is enough to sit slightly to the side for the image to begin losing saturation and clarity, and the black to take on a lighter shade. This is the natural price to pay for the significantly better contrast and deeper blacks, which are a definite advantage in this variant.

Viewing angles on the OLED811 are excellent and among the best on the market. Even sitting well off to the side, you still see the picture with deep blacks and well-saturated colors. That's a big advantage over LCD screens: you don't have to sit exactly in front to enjoy good picture quality.

QD-OLED panels perform even better, preserving colors more accurately at an angle. On the Philips, at wider viewing angles whites shift slightly toward a greenish tint, but the effect is so minor that it's hard to find it bothersome while watching. We'd even say that in this respect we encountered the best WOLED unit we've tested so far.

Daytime performance

5.4/10

6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Glare
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

Philips OLED811: 392 cd/m2

Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA): 397 cd/m2

The performance of the Bravia 3 in the VA variant during the day is a mix of pros and cons. The manufacturer has also used a satin coating here, but compared to IPS, it struggles more with direct reflections. When sharp light hits the screen, reflections can be more pronounced and may interfere with viewing. On the other hand, the television compensates with higher brightness. In normal daytime conditions, the image is clearer and sharper than in the version with the IPS panel. Thanks to this, in everyday use, the Bravia 3 in the VA edition can perform even better, as long as it is not placed in a highly sunlit area.

OLED811 handles daytime viewing fairly well, though in a very bright living room it already has its limits. Maximum SDR brightness reaches about 600 nits, comparable to the LG C6 or the Samsung S90H, which use the same panel. That's noticeably higher than basic OLEDs and will be more than enough for most people. Keep in mind, however, that this brightness isn't maintained across the whole screen; with a lot of white it drops, and the average of our measurements was about 392 nits.

Direct reflections from windows or lamps can be a bigger problem. The glossy coating reduces them reasonably well, but you can still see them clearly on the screen, especially in dark scenes. It doesn't diffuse them as effectively as matte screens, so placing the TV opposite a large window isn't the best idea. On the plus side, black levels remain very good during the day. In a typical living room the Philips will perform without major issues, but if strong sunlight falls directly on the screen, you'll want blinds.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
WRGB OLED
Software version during testing
6120600301
TPM267E_V167.002.054.151
Image processor
MT5896 2,5 GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) TV Panel details
Review Philips OLED811 TV Panel details

TV features

6.1/10

7.9/10

  • System
    Google TV
    Titan OS
  • System performance
    SystemResponsiveness-
    Good
  • HDMI inputs
    4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) TV features
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) TV features
Review Sony Bravia 3 50' (VA) TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    Yes
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Smart TV Features

The biggest advantage of the Bravia 3 in everyday use is the presence of the Google TV system. Thanks to it, we have access to one of the largest libraries of applications and streaming services, so regardless of whether someone mainly uses Netflix, Disney+, or smaller platforms, everything is at their fingertips. The Google voice assistant also worked very well, responding to our commands quite "smartly." The Google TV system should theoretically operate very smoothly because Sony has been implementing it better than many cheaper competitors for years. Unfortunately, in the case of the Bravia 3, it's not as nice as we would expect. During testing, we noticed slight lagging in the interface, and some features, such as screen mirroring, simply refused to cooperate. One might get the impression that the processor in this model sometimes struggles to handle the demanding system, and not everything works as smoothly as we would expect.

Classic Features

Sony, even in the cheapest series, manages to remind us of its experience with various users. In the package, we find as many as two remotes. The first is modern and minimalist, with a small number of buttons, which works great for using apps and Google TV functions. The second is a classic remote with a richer set of keys and a numeric keypad, which will be especially appreciated by older people used to traditional solutions. This is a nice nod to different user groups, and it must be admitted that Sony handled this very practically. However, it is a pity that compared to the X75WL model, the ability to record content from TV tuners to USB memory has disappeared. The manufacturer has completely abandoned this feature, so if someone was attached to it, they will unfortunately not find it in the Bravia 3.

Smart features: Titan OS

It's the Smart TV system that is the most controversial change in the OLED811. Philips dropped the user-favorite Google TV in favor of its own Titan OS. For many people this may be hard to accept, although Titan has been getting better every year and runs noticeably smoother. We have working AirPlay, screen mirroring from a computer, and voice search in Polish. System responsiveness has improved too, though minor delays still occur when navigating menus. We suspect the infrared remote is partly to blame, as it doesn't always register commands immediately. The biggest limitation compared with Google TV remains a smaller app selection. That doesn't mean it's empty — you'll find Netflix, Prime Video, Disney+, CANAL+, and Apple TV was recently added to the library. If you mainly use popular services, Titan should be enough, but it's worth checking availability of lesser-known apps before buying (list at the bottom 😉).

Ambilight

Ambilight is still one of the best reasons to consider a Philips. On the OLED811 it's three-sided — LEDs at the top and along the sides of the chassis light the wall with colors matched to what's happening on screen. In the evening it creates a great effect and can change the mood of the whole room, which is why we awarded extra points for this feature. You don't have to use dynamic picture tracking though. If you prefer calmer viewing conditions, you can set a steady white light. That's a nice option for evening sessions when you don't want to sit in front of a bright screen in a completely dark room.

Classic features

For regular TV watching the OLED811 performs well, although there is no USB recording or picture-in-picture (PiP). You can connect Bluetooth headphones and use them at the same time as the TV speakers. What bothers us most is the aforementioned infrared control. The remote itself is really interestingly designed: it has backlighting and a hybrid keyboard with a numeric section. It's a shame you have to aim it at the TV like with old remotes. For equipment at this level we'd prefer to just press buttons without wondering which way we're holding the remote. Hopefully Philips will fix that in future models.

Apps

9.6/10

7.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.6/10

8.6/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
Yes
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
No
6 Mpix
Yes
No
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

Here, Sony really did a great job. The built-in player works quickly and doesn’t "hassle" when launching various formats. We didn't have to reach for external applications like VLC, as the TV handled even files that can cause a lot of issues on other models – such as HEIC photos from Apple devices. It’s a small detail, but one that shows the manufacturer wanted the user to feel complete convenience. By just plugging in a USB drive with a movie or photos from vacation onto an external hard drive, you can connect it and start watching on the big screen immediately. No fuss, no installing additional software, no searching for workarounds. This is really a rarity in TVs, and it must be said that in this aspect, Bravia 3 truly surprised us pleasantly.

The USB player in the OLED811 handles most of the audio and video formats we test, so it’s perfectly fine for watching a movie or playing music from a USB flash drive. Our biggest complaints are with photos, specifically the oddly selective handling of their resolutions. The TV opened files at 8, 16 and 32 MP, but couldn’t deal with the rest. It’s not that the photos are simply too large; the player can display a higher-resolution image yet refuse to open a smaller one. When browsing vacation photos this can be plain annoying, because some will have to be converted on a computer first... or you can just use remote screen capture... 😉

Sound

6.5/10

7.6/10

  • Maximum volume
    88dB
    93dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

Bravia 3 plays in a rather flat manner, but makes up for it with volume. It will perform flawlessly for watching traditional television, as the dialogues are clear and the mid-tones are well audible. This type of characteristic will be particularly appreciated by older users who primarily care about speech intelligibility. However, if someone expects something more from the sound, such as stronger bass or a wider soundstage, it is worth reaching for a soundbar despite everything. The television supports modern codecs, including Dolby Atmos and DTS:X, so an external sound system will easily utilize their potential. This ensures that with a relatively small expense, one can achieve a much fuller and more engaging sound.

When it comes to sound, there have been a few concrete changes compared with last year’s OLED820. The rear subwoofer has been removed, and the 4.1 speaker layout has been replaced by a 2.2 configuration. Despite those changes, the OLED811 still sounds good and quite balanced. It can play louder, and the sound even seems a bit fuller than last year. The bass has taken a hit, though. While the sound has some weight, the low end lacks the depth of the previous model. You notice this most in films and music, when you’re waiting for a bigger impact. Still, this is definitely well above average for built-in TV speakers. If you want deeper bass and clearer spatial effects, it’s worth considering a soundbar or a system with an AV receiver. Philips gives you a lot of flexibility here: it supports both Dolby Atmos and DTS, and can pass Dolby TrueHD tracks over HDMI eARC to compatible equipment without issue. So there’s plenty to take advantage of if we decide to expand the sound system later.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

93dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy