SHARP JP7765E vs LG OLED C6 (WOLED)

Direct comparison

JP7

C6 / C64 / C6E / C6H / C61

Info

Available screen sizes: 50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 42”48”55”65”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.2

8.3

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.4

    8.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.0

    8.8

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    3.9

    8.6

  • Gaming on console

    6.1

    9.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    5.0

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    7.3

    6.6

  • Utility functions

    6.4

    8.4

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    6.0

    7.0

Advantages

  • Good black and contrast - mini-LED backlight with VA matrix

  • High brightness - handles bright living rooms

  • Google TV system - unlimited base of apps and smart features

  • Very good file player - plays almost everything

  • Mini-jack output - rare and useful headphone jack

  • Extremely loud - up to 90 dB (perfect for seniors)

  • Very attractive price

  • Perfect black levels and OLED contrast

  • Very high HDR brightness, up to about 1,500 nits

  • Excellent picture quality for HDR movies and Dolby Vision

  • Very good image processing and upscaling

  • 165 Hz panel and virtually no motion blur

  • Great gaming package: VRR, G-Sync, HGiG, Dolby Vision Gaming

  • Very low input lag, about 5 ms at 120 Hz

  • Wide viewing angles

  • Intuitive and modern WebOS system

  • Convenient control using the Magic Remote with a gyroscope

Disadvantages

No like
  • Massive smearing and only 60Hz panel

  • Poor mini-LED local dimming algorithms

  • Narrow viewing angles (a natural feature of VA panels)

  • No VRR and HGiG – features for gamers

  • Weird sound – the audio has a "gap" in dialogues

  • Different remote versions depending on the C6 model; before buying, it's hard to know which Magic Remote will be included

  • Visible graininess (dithering) in dark areas; noticeable when viewed up close

  • Average reflection handling; in a very bright living room strong reflections may be visible

  • No DTS:X support; you'll need an external AV receiver or player for that format

Our verdict

Sharp JP7765 is another offering in the market that tries to prove that Mini-LED technology doesn’t have to cost a fortune. The low price is matched with an exceptionally high brightness — a peak of 1000 nits in HDR is a result that simply impresses in this price range. Although the proprietary processor doesn’t always manage backlighting perfectly in demanding scenes, support for Dolby Vision effectively saves the situation. Thanks to dynamic metadata, the image becomes plastic, deep, and simply appealing to the eye. Adding to this the Google TV system, extreme volume, and a rarely-seen headphone jack, we get a device that is a brilliant option for seniors or less demanding viewers transitioning from basic, cheap LCDs. In such a scenario, the Sharp JP7 appears to be a really decent and cost-effective choice. However, it must be made clear: contrary to marketing slogans, this is not equipment for everyone. Gamers or sports fans will definitely not find themselves here. The biggest drawback of the JP7765 model is the slow, 60Hz panel and significant motion blur, which essentially disqualifies this television when watching dynamic matches or playing fast-paced titles. The image loses sharpness so markedly during rapid movements that for a football or racing fan, it may be an unacceptable barrier.

So who is the Sharp JP7765 for? It is a sensible option for budget-conscious individuals who do not have high demands for motion fluidity but appreciate a “kick” of brightness. By choosing the Sharp JP7, you will definitely make a better deal than purchasing basic (non-dimming) televisions from the competition. Rivals usually offer standard LCD panels at a similar price that cannot compare to the capabilities of even such a basic Mini-LED model as the JP7. Ultimately, it’s a matter of a simple arrangement: you accept weaker motion fluidity in exchange for the powerful brightness that is hard to find with other manufacturers at this price point.

The LG C6 is a very successful evolution of one of the most popular OLEDs on the market. The TV itself hasn't changed dramatically compared with last year's C5; the look is very similar, webOS offers comparable features, and gamers again get pretty much everything you'd expect from a modern TV. It's hard to fault that, since the C5 was already a very complete device in that regard. The most important change took place where there was actually room for improvement: the panel itself. The new WOLED panel is noticeably brighter, and roughly 1500 nits in HDR makes it increasingly hard to treat the C6 as just a "mid-range OLED." HDR movies look very impressive, black stays perfect, colors are very good, and the new processor (the same one found in the flagship G6) handles upscaling and lower-quality content very well. Add to that a seriously strong set of features for gamers. 165 Hz from a PC, VRR, G-Sync and very low input lag mean you can just as well hook up a console as a powerful PC. During the day the C6 also performs better than previous generations, though of course in a very bright living room you'll still find brighter TVs on the market. And that's probably exactly why we like the C series most: its versatility. The C6 doesn't try to be the best TV in every possible category, but it hardly performs poorly in any of them. It's suitable for movies, sports, gaming, regular TV and everyday streaming. If its price starts to fall after launch as it did with previous generations, it could be one of the most interesting OLEDs to buy in 2026.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
IR (remote)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Premium
Stand type
Central
Central
Bezel color
Silver
Silver
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.3/10

10/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 160 (10 x 16)

Contrast:

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

64,100:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

18,250:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

46,350:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

7,000:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

4,500:1

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

Moving on to what is most important in Mini-LEDs, namely contrast and black levels, the Sharp JP7 in the 55-inch size we tested utilizes a VA panel. Combined with backlighting split into 160 zones (in a 10x16 configuration), this promises truly solid performance. Measurements on static film test images can be downright shocking, with measured contrast reaching five-digit values, even hitting levels of 50,000:1. On paper, this is a result that much more expensive models would not be ashamed of, and black levels under these conditions look very attractive.

Unfortunately, a television is purchased for watching films, not for admiring static images, and this is where the charm wears off a bit. When something more starts happening on the screen—especially in complicated, dark scenes with a lot of small bright elements—the backlighting system in the JP7 begins to literally go haywire. The zones can "dance" before the viewer's eyes, turning on and off in a way that can be simply annoying and detracts from the action. It is clear that Sharp has a huge room for improvement regarding local dimming management. The hardware potential in the form of Mini-LEDs is significant, but the controlling algorithms clearly struggle to tame them.

If we talk about black levels, there isn't much to discuss. The LG C6 uses an OLED panel, so each pixel can be completely turned off. The result is exactly what we'd expect: perfect black, very high contrast, and no halo or glow around bright elements. You can see this clearly in night scenes, where single lamps, text, or other bright points appear against a very dark background. The C6 handles them without any problems and doesn't have the limitations typical of Mini LED TVs with local dimming. Interestingly, in this respect it doesn't matter whether we're talking about this version of the C6 or the more expensive variant with a Tandem OLED panel. In terms of black alone, both TVs perform practically identically. Differences between them need to be sought mainly in brightness and color.

NOTE: In the helicopter scene from the film Sicario 2 we noticed graininess and flickering in the darkest parts of the image. It looks like a software bug that LG should fix with an update. In the Tandem OLED version the effect is even more visible, and we observed similar behavior in the flagship LG G6 as well.

HDR effect quality

5.3/10

7.8/10

Supported formats
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 94.0%, Bt.2020: 70.1%
DCI P3: 99.5%, Bt.2020: 75.7%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

1014 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

247 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

606 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

180 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

605 nit

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1489 nit

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1288 nit

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1527 nit

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1345 nit

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

649 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

LG OLED C6 (WOLED)

SHARP JP7765E

Luminance of RGB colors

So how does the brightness of the Sharp JP7 perform in the most demanding titles? Honestly: at first, we were quite surprised. The television is capable of achieving over 1000 nits of brightness, which is an outstanding and rarely seen result for a device costing just under 2000 zł (for 55 inches). Watching bright, full-screen scenes, one can get the impression that we are dealing with truly good equipment. However, unfortunately, we must return to the problem we mentioned earlier regarding local dimming management. When small, bright elements appear on a dark background on the screen (like in the test scenes from Life of Pi or Sicario 2), it is noticeable how poorly the JP7 handles the zones. The television dims them almost to the maximum, stifling the whole HDR effect, which at such moments resembles a flat SDR image (less than 200 nits). This instability makes the image on the JP7 unfortunately lose its appeal in demanding, contrast-heavy films.

As a consolation, it is worth noting that the panel has the potential for good color display. A PFS (phosphor) filter has been implemented here, allowing the coverage of the DCI-P3 palette to reach a solid 94%. The manufacturer calls its product a “QLED,” even though it is mainly based technologically on the aforementioned PFS filter. Considering the recent market battles among manufacturers about what can and cannot be called QLED, we leave the issue of the correctness of this naming to your judgment. However, it remains a fact that the potential for reproducing saturated colors in this panel is simply good.

The HDR effect on the LG C6 is really very good. LG Display's new WOLED panel primarily brought a significant increase in brightness. In our unit we measured around 1,500 nits and, importantly, the TV can show similar values in many normal movie scenes. That gives HDR the proper impact. Bright highlights, lamps, or sunlight can be really strong, and most HDR movies simply look very impressive. Of course it's still an OLED, so brightness drops in scenes with a lot of white. The fifth scene of The Meg illustrates this well, where the C6 reached about 600-700 nits. That's still a very good result, but it also shows the new panel hasn't removed all the limitations typical of OLEDs.

Colors

When it comes to color, there is also little to complain about. The C6 covers about 99% of the DCI-P3 gamut and roughly 75% of BT.2020. In practice the colors are very saturated and, importantly, stable regardless of the scene. That's worth emphasizing, because not every TV behaves the same in this respect. In some RGB Mini LED models color saturation can depend more strongly on image brightness. Today a wider color gamut is mainly offered by QD-OLED TVs and new SQD models with a new generation of quantum dots. However, the C6 still performs very strongly here and is able to generate appropriately saturated colors in most movie scenes.

Factory color reproduction

4/10

7.8/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

When it comes to out-of-the-box colors, the Sharp JP7 was tested in Film mode, which traditionally offers the most consistent image compared to the yellowed “Eco” mode or the glaring blue of the “Dynamic” mode. Although this is the best choice among the available settings, the results are still far from ideal. The white balance clearly lacked red and blue components, causing many scenes to take on an unnatural, greenish tint. Another issue was the gamma – during fullscreen scenes, the television provides too much brightness, completely stripping away its cinematic character. All of this translated into color reproduction errors, particularly with shades of gray, which exceeded Delta E 10. Just to remind: errors above 2-3 are already noticeable to the human eye, so here we are dealing with a significant distortion of reality.

In HDR mode, the situation is reversed but not any better. Here, the blue color dominates the white balance, giving the image an unnatural, almost “store-like” sharpness reminiscent of aggressive demo modes. Furthermore, the measurements of the EOTF curve emphasize the store-like nature of the image. The graph clearly shows that the television generates an image significantly brighter than the standards predict, resulting in an artificially boosted and unrealistic final effect. The Sharp JP7 is evidently trying to appear stronger than it actually is, but it does so at the expense of fidelity to the content.

Right out of the box the LG C6 is pretty well set up, especially if you choose Filmmaker mode. In SDR material the white balance is decent, although as brightness increases it starts to lack a bit of red. The picture becomes a little cooler as a result, but it’s not such a big difference that it stands out during normal viewing. More happens in the brightness response itself. Gamma is a bit low and instead of holding at 2.4 it sits closer to 2.1–2.2 over much of the range. In practice the C6 slightly brightens midtones. Shadows are therefore more readable, but the image loses some depth compared with how it should look in a dark room. In HDR the situation is a bit more interesting. The start of the grayscale looks very good, but from about 20–30% brightness the white balance starts to drift more and more. As brightness rises there’s more red and a noticeable lack of blue. In the brightest highlights the difference is already significant and also affects reproduction of some colors. The EOTF curve itself is handled fairly well over most of the range. The C6 only has a tendency to slightly brighten the image, which we also saw during our film comparisons. The largest deviation appears around the brightest highlights, where the TV begins to adapt the signal to the panel’s capabilities. So the out-of-the-box Filmmaker mode in HDR isn’t perfect, but overall it performs well. The biggest room for improvement is the white balance, especially at high brightness.

Color reproduction after calibration

6.7/10

9.1/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

We subjected the JP7 to our standard calibration procedure and truly... the television gained a new life thanks to it, especially in SDR content (YouTube, classic television, series, or older movies). Because we managed to accurately set the white balance and stabilize the gamma, color errors dropped to a value of below 3. This is a level at which the human eye has trouble detecting discrepancies. In this scenario, the Sharp JP7 delivers an image with really great color accuracy, which is a significant advantage in this price range. However, the content in HDR turned out to be much more problematic. Here, despite our efforts and adjustments to the settings, the television simply did not want to cooperate. In the JP7 menu, we cannot find any option that would allow for real control over brightness management (EOTF). Although a significant portion of color errors was reduced, the image still remained unnaturally oversaturated. It's a pity because the potential of the mini-LED backlit panel is large, but the software presents a clear barrier.

The conclusion is simple: when watching less demanding content (SDR) on the JP7, you can expect an image that is more than satisfactory, but in HDR, you have to come to terms with a certain degree of "artificiality" that cannot be overcome even with professional equipment.

LG TVs have been very receptive to calibration for years, and the C6 is no exception. After adjustment the white balance was set almost perfectly, and most color errors dropped to values below 3, often even around 2. In practice this means very accurate color reproduction in both SDR and HDR. An interesting detail appeared only with the HDR brightness characteristic. On a classic EOTF chart everything looks nearly ideal, and at first glance it would be hard to find fault. Only when we measured the TV’s behavior using filters based on actual movie scenes did it become clear that the C6 has a slight tendency to artificially boost image brightness.

It’s not a huge difference and many people may even see it as a positive, because HDR looks a bit more impressive this way. From the standpoint of fidelity to the source material this isn’t ideal — some scenes are simply a touch brighter than the filmmaker intended. Interestingly, this is somewhat unusual for LG. In previous generations, the brand’s TVs typically stuck very closely to the reference tone curve after calibration. With the C6 we’re still very close to the standard, but that subtle boost in brightness is indeed noticeable in films and series.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

7/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

When it comes to image purity, posterization on the Sharp JP7 fortunately doesn't distract too much from the content being viewed. In most scenes, it's hard to spot irritating stripes or the so-called "color stair stepping," which often ruin the experience in scenes with flat colors. Of course, you can't expect miracles here because in some extremely demanding scenes, a trained eye may notice errors in tonal transitions. However, this is not a level that could realistically distract during a film. Well, unless you have good eyesight and are looking for artifacts on the screen – then you'll probably find something.

The LG C6 handles tonal transitions very well. In most movie scenes it was hard to notice any obvious posterization issues. Both in the dark parts of the image and in bright gradients the colors remain relatively smooth and do not break up into visible bands. That's good news, because WOLED panels haven't always been perfect in this regard. With the C6 it's clearly better, and during normal viewing this aspect of the image shouldn't draw attention.

Note: One downside is the dithering visible in near-black areas. Up close you can notice subtle flicker and grain in the darkest parts of the image. It's not as pronounced as with the Tandem OLED panel, but it still occurs, so we decided to dock the C6 a few points in this category.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

3.5/10

8.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
No
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

When it comes to lower quality materials and how the Sharp JP7 handles them, the situation is ambiguous. Let's start with the upscaling – here we have no major objections. The process of scaling the image to a higher resolution is correct; the image remains readable and clear, without the overscan effect or cropped edges. Of course, this is not at the level of top models and at times one can notice slight jaggedness on the contours, but in this price range, the effect is fully acceptable.

However, the digital image processing itself is significantly worse, as aside from the scaling, it virtually does not exist. In the JP7 menu, we won't find any option that would effectively smooth out unwanted tonal transitions or reduce noise in the image. As a result, the signal reaches the matrix in a very raw form, which, with heavily compressed materials (e.g., from YouTube), leads to visible posterization. Either this is a flaw in the software or a very strange design decision, as in earlier Sharp models, this feature was available and, more importantly, worked with noticeable effect. Here we are left at the mercy of what the source provides, without any digital support from the image processor.

The LG C6 has taken a really big step forward here. The TV uses the same processor found in the flagship G6, and in terms of image processing the two models are very similar. That’s a big plus, because in this area LG’s processor this year performs excellently. The "Smooth Gradation" feature works especially well. With heavily compressed material it can effectively hide ugly tonal transitions and artifacts that often appear, for example, in lower-quality streaming. It’s best to leave it set to "Low." Then the improvement is clear, and the TV doesn’t yet start blurring fine details. Higher levels smooth the image more, but can already remove some of the natural texture of objects on the screen. The upscaling itself also performs very well. Lower-resolution content is sharpened properly, edges look clean, and the processor quite effectively rebuilds fine details. In this regard the C6 is already very close to LG’s best TVs, and the differences compared with the G6 are small.

Blur and motion smoothness

2/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
165Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
-
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
-
-
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
49%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur ():

Blur (4K@165Hz):

The motion fluidity on the Sharp JP7 is very mediocre, and the reason is simple: the television uses a 60Hz panel. This immediately makes it difficult to recommend for watching sports or serious gaming, where higher refresh rates are already the standard. The only real plus is the presence of a motion smoother, which we can control in movies using a slider called De-judder. Lower settings produce a more raw, "cinematic" (frame-based) image, while higher settings add artificial fluidity. We suggest setting it somewhere in the middle of the scale, that is, in the 3-5 range – this is the best compromise to avoid the soap opera effect while getting rid of the tiring image stutter. Interestingly, in the menu, we also find a slider for "motion blur reduction," which usually suggests the presence of a 120Hz panel. However, in the case of the JP7, it does not contribute anything to the image and serves more as a placeholder – it is meant to look good in the settings, but technically it should not function on this panel.

The LG C6 features a panel with a maximum refresh rate of 165 Hz, which is great news especially for gamers using a powerful PC. For movies, sports, or consoles we'll of course use up to 120 Hz, but even then it's hard to fault the motion clarity. As you'd expect from an OLED, the panel's response time is almost instantaneous. Moving objects therefore don't leave the characteristic smears you still see on LCD TVs. This is particularly noticeable in sports and fast-paced games, where the picture remains very clean even during dynamic motion.

For movies and TV, LG also provides the TruMotion motion-smoothing system. In the user settings you'll find two separate sliders. De-Judder is mainly for low-frame-rate content, that is primarily 24 fps films and series. It can slightly reduce the characteristic judder, or be set higher if you want a much smoother image. De-Blur is useful for higher-frame-rate material, mainly sports broadcasts and 50/60 fps television.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4/10

10/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    No
    Yes
  • VRR range
    No
    40 - 165Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

As we mentioned earlier, the 60Hz panel is not a feature that will attract gamers to the Sharp JP7. Perhaps for the casual gamer, whose console generates most titles at 60 frames per second, there might be something interesting? When it comes to specific additions, we find:

  • ALLM Mode: Automatically switches the TV to low latency game mode (input lag).

  • Game Menu: Which is hard to call a full-fledged “Game Bar,” as its functionality is minimal. Besides enabling ALLM, there is only a smoothness enhancer dedicated to games, which we recommend against because it introduces very noticeable artifacts and spoils the responsiveness.

  • Dolby Vision Gaming: For Microsoft's consoles.

Unfortunately, the list of shortcomings is much longer and more painful than the positives. The biggest disappointment is the lack of support for 120Hz, even when lowering the resolution to Full HD. The presence of 120Hz would allow for performance modes to be activated in many games on PS5 or Xbox Series X. Another absence is VRR, which means that during frame drops, we are susceptible to image tearing. The lack of proper implementation of the HGiG standard is also very problematic. This results in the fact that during HDR calibration in the console menu, it is very easy to “overshoot” the brightness settings. As a result, instead of clear details in highlights, we end up with an unnaturally over-brightened image with cut-off details. The Sharp JP7 is a proposal only for very casual gamers.

LG has focused heavily on gamers for years, and the C6 really lacks nothing important. The TV supports 4K at 120 Hz from consoles, and when connected to a PC it can run up to 165 Hz. It also offers VRR from 40 to 165 Hz, ALLM, and properly working HGiG. A big plus is Dolby Vision support for games, so the Xbox Series X can use that format without sacrificing game mode. The package is rounded out by a Game Bar that lets you quickly check key signal parameters and change settings without leaving the game. In terms of features, the C6 is one of those TVs that’s really hard to find fault with. Whether you play on PlayStation, Xbox, or PC, practically everything you could expect from a modern gaming TV is available here.

Input lag

9.3/10

9.9/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
14 ms
1080p120
29 ms
5 ms
2160p60
13 ms
14 ms
2160p120
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
14 ms
2160p120
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
13 ms
22 ms
2160p120 DV
14 ms

The issue of input lag in the Sharp JP7 is quite intriguing. In all 60Hz modes, the television boasts a result of just 13 ms. This is truly an excellent result, making the lag practically unnoticeable during gameplay. In this respect, Sharp has risen to the occasion, and even in dynamic titles, the controls remain responsive.

However, during our tests, we encountered a certain technical puzzle. Using our professional Murideo generator, we were able to force and measure the input lag at 120Hz refresh rate in Full HD resolution. This sounds promising, but in reality, it is merely a "paper" curiosity, as standard external devices such as consoles or computers were unable to force the Sharp to operate in such a mode. Although professional diagnostic tools see some hidden potential here, for the end user, the JP7 remains just a 60 Hz screen.

In terms of input lag, the C6 performs as a good gaming TV should. At 120 Hz we measured about 5 ms, so controller input is practically instantaneous. At 60 Hz it rises to around 14 ms, which is still good. Slightly higher input lag appears in Dolby Vision. At 120 Hz we get about 14 ms, and at 60 Hz about 22 ms. In practice, if you're playing normally on an Xbox, it's unlikely to be something that will really bother you.

Compatibility with PC

5/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
13ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RWBG
Max refresh rate
60Hz
165Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

The Sharp JP7 performs adequately as a monitor. Although the readability of standard fonts on a white or black background is acceptable, the sharpness clearly drops with darker and thinner text, which makes long work with text difficult. For occasional news browsing in a browser, this panel is sufficient; however, we strongly discourage using it as a permanent screen for PC gaming. Besides the rigid limitation to 60Hz, the TV does not support any form of frame synchronization (lack of G-Sync and FreeSync), which, combined with the enormous blurring of the panel, makes the user experience in dynamic scenarios simply poor.

The C6 also performs very well when connected to a computer. The TV correctly supports 4:4:4 chroma, so text, icons and other small UI elements are displayed sharply. That means you can use it not only for gaming but also for regular work in Windows without major issues. One limitation is the four-subpixel matrix layout. If you sit very close to the screen, you may notice slight colored fringing along the edges of some fonts. However, this is not particularly bothersome and is practically invisible from a normal viewing distance. The C6 also has a lot to offer PC gamers. From a PC you can take full advantage of the 165 Hz refresh rate, plus there’s G-Sync, VRR and a very low input lag of around 5 ms at maximum refresh. Combined with the OLED’s ultra-fast response time, this delivers a very smooth, clean image with no visible smearing. So if someone plans to hook a powerful PC to the C6, the TV can easily serve as a large gaming monitor and also works quite well for everyday productivity.

Viewing angles

3.1/10

7.4/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
77%
33%

The Sharp JP7 uses a VA panel, which automatically means narrow viewing angles. It's a classic compromise: we get quite decent black levels and contrast, but at the expense of image degradation when viewed from the side. At an angle, the colors clearly fade and lose their saturation, so the JP7 is definitely a device meant for watching "straight on," rather than from the corner of the couch.

Viewing angles on the LG C6 are very good and are actually among the best you can find in TVs today. That’s largely thanks to the OLED panel itself. Even when you sit noticeably to the side, the picture still maintains good contrast and the colors don’t lose much of their saturation. Because of that, the C6 is very well suited to a larger living room where not everyone sits directly in front of the screen. Only at very extreme angles can you notice slight changes in color, but during normal viewing it’s hard to regard that as any kind of problem. In this respect, really only Samsung Display's QD-OLED panels perform better.

Daytime performance

7.3/10

6.6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Glare
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

LG OLED C6 (WOLED): 469 cd/m2

SHARP JP7765E: 708 cd/m2

The satin coating used in the Sharp JP7 matrix effectively reduces reflections, although it is still far from fully matte. However, the true "game changer" in bright rooms is the brightness of the device itself with SDR content. An average score of 700 nits and peaks around 1000 nits is an outstanding result in the segment under 2000 PLN. Thanks to such high luminance, the television can easily handle even well-lit living rooms. One just needs to be cautious of direct reflections, e.g., from a window across, because the satin material used here will not eliminate them completely, but at this brightness, the image remains readable.

The LG C6 has a glossy panel that handles direct reflections quite well, but it doesn't eliminate them completely. If there's a large window or a bright lamp opposite the TV, their reflections will still be visible. On the other hand, the screen preserves blacks well in a lit room, and even during the day the picture doesn't become gray or washed out. Additionally, the C6 is fairly bright in SDR. With typical content we measured about 470 nits, so in most living rooms it should handle daytime viewing without major issues. Brightness only starts to drop significantly when a large portion of the screen is occupied by white. This is still one of the typical characteristics of OLEDs, and you can notice it with very bright content, such as winter sports. Overall the C6 performs well in a normally lit living room. However, if the TV will sit opposite huge windows and have to battle strong sunlight for most of the day, a bright Mini LED will still be the better choice.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED PFS LED
WRGB OLED
Software version during testing
UKN4.250714.091
43.11.77
Image processor
MT5896 2GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review SHARP JP7765E TV Panel details
Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) TV Panel details

SHARP JP7765E

LG OLED C6 (WOLED)

TV features

6.4/10

8.4/10

  • System
    Google TV
    WebOS
  • System performance
    Decent
    Very good
  • HDMI inputs
    4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
    IR (remote)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review SHARP JP7765E TV features
Review SHARP JP7765E TV features
Review SHARP JP7765E TV features
Review SHARP JP7765E TV features
Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) TV features
Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) TV features
Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) TV features
Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    Yes
    No
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    No
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Smart TV Features - Google TV

The main advantage of the Sharp JP7 is the Google TV system, which at this moment offers the widest access to applications on the market. The library is almost unlimited – from all popular streaming services to niche VOD solutions or media players. The system provides great freedom of personalization and access to the latest versions of popular platforms. In the package, we get a Bluetooth remote that allows using the built-in voice assistant without having to point at the TV. The only significant lack in the multimedia sphere that we encountered is the absence of AirPlay support. Users of Apple devices, such as the iPhone or iPad, will not be able to directly and wirelessly stream content to the screen of this Sharp.

Classic Features and Connections

Regarding traditional television features, the Sharp JP7 offers nothing beyond the market standard. It lacks the ability to record programs to external storage (PVR) and a dual tuner, which excludes the use of the picture-in-picture (PiP) function. The TV only provides basic solutions, such as teletext and the ability to wirelessly connect accessories via Bluetooth.

As for the connections, the Sharp JP7 offers 4 HDMI ports, which the manufacturer proudly describes as standard 2.1. However, it must be made clear: this is a purely marketing move because in practice these ports only offer full functionality of standard 2.0 due to the limitations of the television. However, it is a plus that there is a classic mini-jack headphone output, which allows connecting older audio sets or speakers without the need for adapters or the HDMI eARC standard. This is quite a rare and very practical addition lately.

Smart TV - webOS

Regardless of which C6 variant you end up with, the feature set is the same. At the heart of the TV is, of course, webOS, the system LG has been developing for many years. It runs fast, is well optimized and, above all, provides access to practically all popular apps. Netflix, Disney+, Prime Video, YouTube, Max and other streaming services - in that respect there are few gaps. The system itself also offers plenty of extra features. There’s AirPlay, easy screen mirroring from your smartphone, control of smart home devices and the ability to personalize the home screen. LG has been expanding webOS for several generations and sometimes the number of tabs and recommendations can be a bit overwhelming, especially with background ads, but once you get used to it the system is convenient and, most importantly, works smoothly.

Classic TV features

The C6 also handles being used like a regular TV very well, not just as a screen for Netflix. Over-the-air TV reception, the program guide and channel switching all work smoothly and there’s little to complain about. LG still offers the ability to record shows to USB, so in terms of classic features the set is really well equipped. There are basically only two things missing. The first is PiP, the ability to display two video sources at once. The second is a backlight on the remote, which would be useful for evening viewing. Other than that the C6 has pretty much everything you can expect from a modern TV.

Magic Remote - DIFFERENT VERSIONS

When buying the C6 it’s worth paying attention to the remote, because LG has created a bit of a mix-up here. During our tests we had, among others, the C64 variant, found in large retail chains. That package included the new, much smaller Magic Remote Slim. It has fewer buttons and looks far more modern, but it still keeps two of LG’s most distinctive remote features - the scroll wheel and pointer control by moving the remote. The C6E we tested came with the older, larger Magic Remote. It works essentially the same, but has a classic numeric keypad and many more physical buttons. It looks less modern, but some people, especially those used to classic remotes, may find it more comfortable. So there’s no single answer to which remote is better. The new one is smaller, simpler and decidedly more contemporary, while the older one gives faster access to more functions without navigating through menus. It’s good to know that depending on the C6 model code the box may contain one or the other variant.

Apps

9.6/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.4/10

9.1/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
Yes
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

When it comes to media playback from external sources, the Sharp JP7 performs simply exceptionally. The built-in player is a true surprise, as it handled virtually every file format we provided. It even managed to support the HEIC format (primarily used in Apple devices), which most televisions struggle with. Here, Sharp displayed photos without the slightest hiccup. Of course, a significant advantage is the presence of the Google TV system, which allows for the installation of external applications like VLC or Kodi in case of any issues. In our opinion, however, this will be an unnecessary measure because the factory player is refined and versatile enough to satisfy even the most demanding users.

During our tests the TV handled practically all of the most popular video formats we put on a USB flash drive without any problems. There were no issues with high bitrates, subtitles, or more demanding files, so it's hard to find fault with it in that respect. The only exception was material with a DTS audio track. This is not surprising, since the TV simply does not support that codec. Besides, the TV’s media player is good enough that most users will be fine without installing third-party apps or hooking up an external player.

Sound

6/10

7/10

  • Maximum volume
    89dB
    88dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

The sound produced by the JP7765E model can be described as atypical, and even – looking at our measurements – rather peculiar. What stands out first is the enormous volume scale. The TV can reach a level of almost 90 decibels (89 dBC on the chart), which is almost a record result in this class. Such strong "loudness" will certainly appeal to seniors or people who need a device with a very high volume.

However, a glance at the frequency chart explains why the sound seems so "strange." The characteristic is extremely uneven: we have a solid boost in the lower registers (around 200 Hz) and in the high tones, but the mid-range – where most of the information about the human voice is located (between 500 Hz and 1.5 kHz) – experiences a huge drop. This makes the sound unnatural and can seem "recessed" at key moments in dialogues.

On the plus side, we have support for the Dolby Atmos format. However, it must be honestly admitted that to truly feel the potential of this system, it will be necessary to connect at least a decent soundbar. The JP7's own speakers, although very loud, cannot deliver the cinematic depth and precision that this standard requires.

In terms of sound, the C6 has hardly changed compared with last year’s C5. We still get a 2.2 system with a total output of 40 W, which is a somewhat more solid foundation than the simple 2.0 20 W setups in many TVs. In practice the sound is quite good. Dialogues are clear, the sound isn’t overly flat, and the extra speakers provide a bit more bass than many basic TVs. Of course it still won’t replace a good soundbar, let alone a full home theater, but it’s more than enough for everyday TV viewing.

There is a small step back in the settings, though. LG removed some of the preset sound modes this year, which makes it a bit harder to tailor the sound to your preferences than with the previous generation. For that reason our rating is slightly lower, even though the speakers’ capabilities remain virtually unchanged. On the plus side, the TV supports Dolby Atmos, currently the most popular surround format for films and streaming. It still lacks DTS support, which may matter mainly to people using their own movie libraries on discs or files.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

89dBC (Max)

75dBC

88dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy