Sharp GP7 is a TV that certainly has its strengths, but it also doesn't escape a few shortcomings. Is it perfect? No, but for its price, it does a really decent job and will work quite well as a nice choice in many homes. The biggest plus? Google TV. Here, Sharp GP7 shows its class – we have an enormous selection of applications, probably the largest on the market. It doesn't matter if we want to watch Netflix, YouTube, or something less known – we will find everything in one place. Additionally, the interface is simple and intuitive, and if we don't feel like clicking, we just need to say to the remote what we are looking for, as it supports voice commands in Polish. Google TV definitely elevates the value of this TV, as we don't feel like we are missing anything. It just works. As for picture quality, it's also quite good. Brightness at 500 nits combined with Dolby Vision does the job – movies look really solid for this price range. Colors, thanks to the PFS (QLED) coating, are vibrant, the contrast from the VA panel gives dark scenes depth, and the overall picture just "plays." It's not premium level, but for this price, you can't really complain. It's a good picture that will satisfy most users. Of course, there are also weaker points. The TV struggles with dynamic scenes – sports or video games won't look perfect here. The 60 Hz panel and response time of the panel are not able to ensure the highest fluidity. Additionally, the manufacturer mentions HDMI 2.1, but all we find here is the ALLM feature. There is a lack of VRR, G-Sync, or other additions that could attract gamers.
In summary – Sharp GP7 is a solid TV for everyday watching of movies and series. It is not for gamers or fans of sports broadcasts, but for universal use – absolutely. If we value access to a rich ecosystem of applications and good picture quality at a reasonable price, this model might be just for us.
Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a television that at first glance doesn’t reveal significant changes compared to its predecessor. Someone might even think it's just a copy of last year's model with a different sticker. And there’s some truth to that, as the main novelty, or rather the only clear difference, is the 120 Hz mode at lower resolutions. It must be acknowledged that this addition really does make a difference – it's not a solution for professional gamers, but rather a nod towards those looking for a smoother picture during casual gaming. This is where the A Pro 2026 can shine – with a simple, yet clever idea that sets it apart in the "super budget" segment. Unfortunately, when we begin to look at the television more broadly, enthusiasm quickly wanes. Even though the year has changed in the calendar, most of the issues known from the A Pro 2025 remain with us – the system can still experience strange stutters, and occasional bugs can be quite annoying. Additionally, there is a lack of any serious tools for digital image processing that worked quite decently last year. As a result, there are many construction limitations visible here that competitors at a similar price point are already trying to mask in some way. As for the quality of the image, we won't be dishonest with you either. Brightness levels of 200–300 nits don't stand a chance against more demanding materials. Yes, simpler streaming content can be watched, but with high-budget productions, it’s immediately clear why the television costs what it does. The impression of watching a flattened image stripped of details accompanies us virtually every time. And here we come to the crux of the matter. Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a television for those who really do not require much. As a daily screen for series, news, or YouTube – it performs fairly well, especially thanks to its operating system, which is GoogleTV. Also, if someone is looking for budget equipment and additionally would like a taste of smoother gameplay in games thanks to the 120 Hz mode, they might even be satisfied. But anyone expecting at least average image quality, a stable system, and proper functionality will quickly notice that there are other budget models on the market that simply perform better.