Samsung U8000F (VA) vs Samsung S85H

Direct comparison

Check the best price offer:

Samsung U8000F (VA)
$314

U8000F / U8092F

Info

S85H

Available screen sizes: 43”50”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 48”55”65”77”83”

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.6

7.9

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.7

    8.0

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.9

    8.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.9

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    6.6

    9.6

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.0

    7.6

  • Watching in bright light

    3.8

    5.1

  • Utility functions

    5.3

    7.3

  • Apps

    8.7

    9.3

  • Sound quality

    5.7

    7.2

Advantages

  • Nice black and contrast (VA panel version)

  • Advanced Smart system: Tizen

  • Great for working with text - displays fonts very well

  • Basic features for gamers - VRR and ALLM

  • Low input lag

  • Perfect blacks and infinite contrast with OLED

  • Good HDR brightness up to around 800 nits

  • High image fidelity after calibration

  • Very smooth motion thanks to a 120 Hz OLED panel

  • Rich set of features for gamers: VRR, Game Bar, low input lag

  • 4 HDMI 2.1 ports with full 48 Gbps bandwidth

  • Feature-rich, smooth-running Tizen system

  • Solar-powered remote with many features

  • Support for Dolby Atmos surround sound

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness

  • Worse viewing angles compared to the IPS matrix version (Obvious, isn't it? 😉)

  • Infrared remote control

  • Worse appearance than its predecessor

  • Worse reflection suppression than its predecessor, a characteristic of the new OLED SE panel

  • Average SDR brightness, best suited for a room with controlled lighting

  • No DTS:X support, mainly a drawback for Blu-ray collectors

  • No Dolby Vision, not necessary but would be nice 🙂

Our verdict

Samsung U8000F with a VA panel is a television that can pleasantly surprise in its class – of course, if we know what to expect from it. Its biggest advantage is definitely the black quality. Compared to the version with an IPS panel, the difference is enormous – the picture gains depth, the contrast looks much better, and evening movie sessions no longer feel like watching content through a gray filter. For a budget segment device, this is truly a nice surprise. The proven Tizen system also deserves credit, which not only works smoothly but also offers access to a full range of applications, support for SmartThings, and a voice assistant (via an app). The PC mode and connection to a console work flawlessly – the fonts are clear and readable. Additionally, it has basic features for gamers, such as VRR and ALLM, which – although they won’t turn this TV into an e-sport machine – are more than sufficient for occasional gaming.

Of course, like any construction in this budget, the U8000F with a VA panel has its limitations. The viewing angles are not one of its strong points – watching the picture from the side easily reveals a drop in quality. Nevertheless, it's hard to consider this a serious drawback – because something has to give. Better black levels are always associated with slightly lesser flexibility in adjustment. When it comes to HDR, we have rather a symbolic approach – the brightness is too low to talk about a true “wow” effect, and the color palette is limited. But let’s face the facts – that’s not why you buy such a TV. So if you're planning to purchase the U8000F, we definitely recommend opting for the version with a VA panel. It's still a very basic model, but in this version, it offers more than one might expect – especially in terms of black quality. And in this price range, that’s quite a lot.

Samsung S85H is a very successful continuation of the S85 series and a TV that still performs its main role well: to be an affordable entry into the world of OLEDs. The biggest change from its predecessor is the use of LG Display's new OLED SE panel, but the overall character of this model remains practically unchanged. Its greatest strengths are still perfect blacks, very high contrast and a picture that can look truly excellent in the evening. Add to that good colors and the ability to achieve a high degree of fidelity to the director's vision. The S85H also works very well as a versatile TV. Gamers get four HDMI 2.1 ports, 120 Hz, VRR, very low input lag and Game Motion Plus, so there is little to complain about here. Tizen runs fast and is user-friendly, and the whole system clearly targets users who today mainly use Netflix, YouTube and other streaming services, while traditional broadcast TV is treated as an extra.

However, the new OLED SE panel is not without flaws. This is most noticeable when watching during the day, because its glare handling is worse than previous OLED panels. Its peak brightness is also not high enough for the S85H to perform particularly well in a very sunlit living room. It is still a TV that shows its strengths best in the evening or in a room with at least partial control over ambient light. And that is probably the best way to look at the S85H. It is not an OLED meant to break brightness records or compete with the most expensive panels. It simply aims to offer what people like most about the technology, but at a lower price. Perfect blacks, very good movie picture quality, excellent gaming features and a convenient smart system make the S85H one of the easiest ways to get into OLED without spending a fortune.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Good
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Black
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Base adjustment
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.3/10

10/10

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,600:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,150:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,900:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,750:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,400:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

It is worth noting that the test concerns the variants with a VA matrix, which perform significantly better in terms of black levels and contrast compared to the 55-inch version equipped with an IPS panel. Thanks to the higher native contrast (though it is not a top result among VA matrices), the tested scenes looked much better – without noticeable grayness or the typical washed-out shadow effect found in IPS matrices. The black levels in the U8092F model can be considered really good and satisfying, especially in this price range. Of course, this is not a design equipped with local dimming, so it is hard to expect spectacular results in very challenging scenes. On the other hand, we are talking about an exceptionally budget-friendly television that performs quite solidly within its range.

The switch to LG Display’s new WOLED SE panel practically changed nothing when it comes to black levels and contrast. And you couldn’t really expect any major improvement, because we’re still talking about OLED, a technology that can completely turn off each pixel individually. In practice this means perfect black and enormous image depth, especially in darker scenes. Black bars are truly black, there is no halo around bright elements, and contrast remains virtually infinite. Even very expensive Mini-LEDs with thousands of local dimming zones still can’t offer the same precision as the S85H. And that is its biggest advantage. The S85H may be Samsung’s cheapest OLED, but in terms of black levels it can deliver exactly the same as much more expensive models using organic panels.

HDR effect quality

3.1/10

6.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 79.1%, Bt.2020: 58.5%
DCI P3: 95.2%, Bt.2020: 70.9%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

212 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

173 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

265 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

90 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

733 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

744 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

837 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

755 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

404 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung S85H

Samsung U8000F (VA)

Luminance of RGB colors

While the U8000F with a VA panel can still be praised for decent blacks, there are no longer any reasons to be impressed regarding brightness – especially in HDR scenes. The television reaches a maximum of just under 250 nits, which is simply too little to talk about any impressive light effects. Bright elements come off as pale, and scenes that should shine look rather flat. An interesting situation was observed during the test of a scene from the movie Sicario 2 – the screen noticeably darkened, as if the television were trying to hide its limitations in displaying blacks. One might get the impression that the device artificially darkens the image to improve contrast, but in practice, the effect doesn't make much of a difference, other than that we see less on the screen. Additionally, there's the issue of colors – the U8000F does not support a wide color gamut, so don't expect vibrant, saturated shades known from better models. The HDR image here resembles slightly brightened SDR and… maybe that’s even a good thing. For this model, it's not worth setting expectations for cinematic experiences – it's better to treat HDR as a modest addition.

Interestingly, the new WOLED SE panel has brought a slight improvement in brightness to the S85 series. In the same movie scenes the previous year's model stayed closer to about 700 nits, while the S85H can reach around 800 nits. Of course this isn't a change that completely transforms the HDR experience, but that extra headroom is noticeable especially with small highlights, reflections, and stronger special effects. Around 800 nits is already a very good result for an entry-level OLED and in most films it's enough for HDR to have the right impact. Bright elements can clearly stand out from perfect black, and that contrast still does most of the heavy lifting here. You should remember the typical limitation of organic technology, though. When a very bright scene covers a large part of the screen, brightness can drop by almost half. This is the result of the panel's protection mechanisms, which limit its power with large bright areas.

Colors

The S85H can produce very pleasant, saturated colors and in most HDR films it looks really good in that respect. We measured roughly 95% DCI-P3 coverage, so the palette most often used in movies is reproduced to a very large degree. Skin tones, greens, and stronger reds still have appropriate intensity, and during normal viewing it's hard to fault them. Only when you look more broadly at BT.2020 do the limitations of the new WOLED SE panel become apparent. Coverage was around 70%, a bit less than in previous-generation WOLEDs and noticeably less than in QD-OLED panels. In films this isn't a major loss, because most productions rarely use such highly saturated colors. You notice it more often in games, where developers are much more likely to employ more intense colors.

Factory color reproduction

6.5/10

7/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

The Samsung U8000F has been tested by us in the best picture mode available out of the box – namely, Filmmaker Mode. This profile is supposed to provide a neutral, cinematic image, free of unnecessary enhancements and artificial beautifications. In the case of SDR content – mainly in HD or SD resolution – the television performed surprisingly well right out of the box. The only noticeable imperfection was brightness management. The gamma chart showed some deviations – slight brightening or dimming of certain tones – but in practice, it did not significantly affect the viewing experience. For a television in this segment, it performs quite well.

However, the situation is considerably weaker in HDR mode. Although white balance was still acceptable, color errors were very pronounced. In the Color Checker test, almost every sample was outside the target point, and the image itself looked unnatural – colors were shifted, sometimes too cool, at other times simply dull and lifeless. The main problem lies in the hardware limitations – the U8000F does not support the wide color gamut of DCI-P3, so it is physically unable to reproduce the colors anticipated by the HDR standard. And unfortunately, this is evident in almost every more demanding scene.

To evaluate color we, of course, selected Filmmaker mode, and in SDR our S85H unit was very well calibrated out of the box. The biggest deviation appears in the white balance, where a bit of blue drops out as brightness increases. In practice this means whites and grays have a slightly warmer tint than they should. It's not a major error and during normal viewing it generally isn't very noticeable. Gamma also stays close to the reference value, so the image is neither overly bright nor unnecessarily dim. The S85H's SDR picture quality is therefore very good straight out of the box. A few more imperfections show up in HDR. Here the white balance shifts more as brightness increases, with blue becoming dominant and the red component noticeably lacking. That also leads to larger errors in some colors. These aren't yet distortions that completely change the character of the image, but compared directly with the reference the difference is easier to spot. Overall, Filmmaker mode is a very good starting point before professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.5/10

9.1/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Right out of the box, the U8000F offered quite a decent picture in SDR for its price range. However, we managed to slightly enhance it – we reduced a subtle purple tint and improved the gamma characteristics, giving it a more natural curve. Despite these adjustments, the TV still tends to brighten the brightest details a bit too aggressively – the gamma graph shows a clear dip that cannot be fully corrected.

On the other hand, in HDR mode, it is noticeably weaker. It's hard to talk about any significant improvement here – despite attempts to tweak the settings, the picture still presents considerable color errors. A Delta E exceeding 7 means noticeable deviations that couldn't be effectively reduced. Unfortunately, this is a limitation of the design itself – the U8000F was simply not designed for serious HDR. In everyday SDR viewing, it performs quite well, but when it comes to HDR content... it's best not to have too high expectations.

Calibration yields very good results on the S85H. First, the white balance can be set almost perfectly, which removes the slightly too-warm image cast that was visible earlier in SDR. Color reproduction itself also improves significantly; most errors drop to a very low level, and in everyday viewing it's hard to notice any visible inaccuracies. You can also improve a lot in HDR, although some issues remain due to the TV's inherent characteristics. The S85H doesn't always perfectly follow the brightness curve. The darkest areas are slightly boosted, and as you approach the panel's limits you can see small deviations in the brightest highlights. On top of that there's limited coverage of the wider BT.2020 gamut, which no calibration can of course overcome. Despite this, the end result is very good, and after calibration the S85H can deliver a well-tuned, natural image.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.5/10

7/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

One of the key elements influencing the perception of the image is the way the television handles tonal transitions – that is, the blending of colors and shades without clear boundaries. In the case of the Samsung U8092F model, it performed really well. On the test screens, we did not observe any visible banding or disruptions in the colored gradients. The image retains a natural quality, without excessive digital interference, which unfortunately tends to be the norm in this class of equipment. Minimal imperfections appeared in very bright sections, but they are practically imperceptible and do not affect daily use of the television.

The smoothness of tonal transitions is definitely not a strong suit of the S85H compared with other OLEDs. It's most noticeable on bright gradients, where fairly distinct banding appears between successive shades. Instead of an ideally smooth transition you can see separate color bands, and you don't have to look hard to spot them. Gradients in motion look even worse. When gradients move the imperfections become more visible and the image looks simply average in that regard. Dark gradients are not perfect either. You can see unevenness there as well, so the problem isn't limited to the brightest parts of the image. Of course you won't notice this all the time in a typical movie, but scenes with large areas of similar color such as the sky, fog, a sunset or a dark background can reveal the panel's limitations. Compared with older WOLEDs there is still some improvement, but looking at the TVs we've tested this year the S85H performs averagely in this respect, much like its competitor the LG B6, which uses the same panel. This is also one of those characteristics where the difference versus last year's QD-OLED panel becomes very clear. QD-OLEDs handle smooth blending of successive shades much better and clearly beat the WOLED SE panel used here when it comes to gradation.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5/10

7.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
No
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

When it comes to how the Samsung U8000F handles lower quality materials, we must admit that Samsung has made progress compared to its predecessor from last year – the DU7192 model, which theoretically occupies the same position in the lineup. This year's model is equipped with a feature for improving the fluidity of tonal transitions, which has been implemented much better than last year. Yes, the TV still uses quite strong algorithms that can distort details or remove film grain, but despite that – it can be confidently said that it works effectively. However, not everything went perfectly. The U8000F has noticeable issues with slight image stuttering when watching very old content in very low resolution. If someone plans to play their old VHS tape, they should be prepared for the image to appear slightly "choppy."

For the S85H, Samsung used the same proprietary NQ4 Gen2 AI processor as in last year’s S85F, and in terms of digital image processing it performs quite well. Upscaling is one of this model’s strengths. Lower-resolution content is well sharpened, edges look natural, and the image doesn’t feel overly artificial. Just bear in mind a common Samsung quirk: at very low resolutions you can’t completely disable overscan, so the TV may slightly crop the left edge of the image. The "noise reduction" function, which smooths weaker tonal transitions, also works very well. The processor can effectively remove posterization and other imperfections visible in lower-quality material. However, you need to be careful with the strength of this feature, because Samsung can be fairly aggressive here. When it’s enabled, along with unwanted artifacts, fine image details such as the texture of skin or clothing can start to disappear.

Blur and motion smoothness

4/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
120Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
-
No
Brightness drop with BFI
47%
49%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (Upłynniacz ruchu 4K@60Hz):

Blur (4K@60Hz):

The Samsung U8000F is equipped with a 60 Hz panel, so right from the start, it's clear that we shouldn't expect miracles. This is simply standard in this class – sufficient for everyday viewing but without any frills. The TV offers one motion enhancement slider – a feature called "Motion Blur Reduction," which allows us to adjust the smoothness of the image in movies. Higher settings give a more "theatrical" and smoothed effect, while lower settings help maintain the original character of the film with a slight 24p effect. An interesting feature is "Clear Motion LED," which is a BFI mode – inserting black frames between image frames to improve motion sharpness. However, in practice, the screen flickers heavily when it's activated, and it should be treated more as an experiment than something that genuinely improves gaming comfort.

The S85H uses an OLED panel, so it performs excellently when it comes to motion blur. Pixels respond virtually instantly, so moving objects don’t leave the characteristic ghosting seen on some LCD TVs. This is especially noticeable with sports or fast-paced games, where the image stays very clean even during rapid motion. The panel runs at 120 Hz. That’s more than enough for movies, TV series, sports, or console gaming. It’s a bit of a shame Samsung didn’t include a higher refresh rate aimed at PC gamers, since more and more TVs now offer 144 or even 165 Hz at 4K. However, that doesn’t affect motion perception in films or sports. There’s also the classic motion smoothing feature with two settings, blur reduction and judder reduction. So you can choose whether films should keep their cinematic 24 frames per second or if you prefer to smooth them a bit. The S85H gives you plenty of flexibility here, and the interpolation works well and, with reasonable settings, doesn’t produce too many artifacts.

Console compatibility and gaming features

5.3/10

9.6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 120Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    No
    Yes

[UPDATE] We have updated our 2025 Samsung TV reviews following the release of firmware version 1131, which officially restores the essential HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) support.

Samsung U8000F offers a basic set of features for gamers, which nonetheless may be sufficient for less demanding users. It has an automatic game mode – when a game is launched on the console, the TV automatically switches to low latency mode, significantly improving response time. It also includes a VRR feature, or variable refresh rate, which operates in the range of 48 to 60 Hz. This means that both Xbox and PS5 will not produce a "tearing" effect on the screen – as long as we stay within this range.

And unfortunately, that's about it when it comes to advantages. Additions like Game Bar or higher refresh rates are reserved for higher models of Samsung from the 2025 line. In theory, the TV also supports the HGiG function, which should adjust the HDR image to the intentions of game developers. Unfortunately – even though this feature appears in brochures and marketing materials – its configuration on the Xbox console turned out to be... impossible in practice.

The Samsung S85H is very well set up for gaming, whether you connect a console or a PC. The manufacturer didn’t skimp on ports and all four HDMI inputs support full HDMI 2.1. That means you can use 4K at 120 Hz, VRR, and ALLM without worrying which input to plug your console into. With several devices that matters, because you don’t have to choose between a console, a PC, or a soundbar connected via eARC. The feature set itself is very comprehensive. The S85H supports VRR, FreeSync, and automatic switching to game mode, and Samsung offers its comprehensive Game Bar, which lets you quickly view key signal parameters and change settings without leaving the game. The only real omission is Dolby Vision, which will matter mainly to Xbox owners. That’s a typical trait of Samsung TVs. Game Motion Plus performs very well and is one of the features that have set Samsung TVs apart for years. It smooths motion in games running at 30 or 60 fps, but does so without as large an increase in input lag as traditional motion smoothing. In practice, with more relaxed games, racing titles, or action games this can really improve perceived motion, especially if you’re sensitive to low framerates.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
11 ms
10 ms
1080p120
5 ms
2160p60
11 ms
10 ms
2160p120
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
11 ms
10 ms
2160p120
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

In our tests, the Samsung U8092F performed phenomenally in terms of input lag. Regardless of the resolution, the results were very low, which is truly impressive for this price segment. Therefore, we can confidently say that gaming on this television will not cause irritation due to significant delays between what we do on the controller and what we see on the screen. For most gamers, even the more demanding ones, this result should be more than satisfactory.

Samsung S85H also performs very well in terms of input lag. At 120 Hz we measured input lag below 5 ms, which is a level at which the TV's response to controls is practically instantaneous. At 60 Hz the delay is naturally higher, but still remains very low, about 10 ms, so in this respect the S85H gives little reason to complain.

Compatibility with PC

6/10

7.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
11ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGWB
Max refresh rate
60Hz
120Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Working on a computer using this television is a real pleasure. The Samsung U8092F supports chroma 4:4:4, and despite being a version with a VA panel, the readability of fonts is very, very good. The television is also suitable for occasional gaming on a PC, mainly due to its low input lag. However, one must take into account that the G-Sync feature does not work on this model, which is strange because VRR worked without problems when it came to the console.

The Samsung S85H also works very well as a large PC monitor. Font readability is good, and from the typical distance you sit from a screen this size, text looks really good. You just need to remember the four-subpixel layout of the WOLED panel, which means that from very close up the edges of letters aren't quite as perfectly sharp as on a traditional RGB monitor. However, this is a characteristic of OLED technology itself and shouldn't be an issue in normal TV use.

The S85H also has a lot to offer PC gamers. It delivers 120 Hz, G-Sync support, very low input lag, and of course the lightning-fast response time of the OLED panel. The only thing that was really missing was the ability to run the panel at a higher refresh rate. More and more TVs already support 144 or 165 Hz at 4K, so an additional mode like that would be welcome here.

Viewing angles

3.7/10

7.5/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
67%
34%

Viewing angles are one of the big advantages of the S85H and OLED panels in general. Even when you view the screen from well off to the side, the image still retains good contrast, brightness and color saturation. In this respect the S85H performs significantly better than practically any LCD or Mini-LED TV available today. Only QD-OLED panels actually do better, keeping colors even more stable at wide angles. However, you’ll only find those in higher-end models.

Daytime performance

3.8/10

5.1/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Average
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Panel brightness

Samsung S85H: 350 cd/m2

Samsung U8000F (VA): 204 cd/m2

Thanks to the satin coating on the Samsung U8092F matrix, it does quite well at reducing reflections. The screen doesn't act like a mirror, and the colors – given the capabilities of this class of device – remain fairly saturated, even in somewhat brighter conditions. Unfortunately, the coating alone won't work miracles. The television is simply too dark to effectively cut through very difficult lighting conditions. If we place it against a light source (e.g., a large window or a strong lamp) – unfortunately, we have to reckon with the fact that not everything will be visible on it.

Samsung S85H is a moderately bright TV. In our measurements the average brightness in SDR was about 350 nits, so that should be enough for ordinary daytime viewing as long as the TV isn't placed in a very sunlit living room. In a moderately lit room the picture remains readable, but with large windows and light hitting the screen directly the S85H's capabilities start to run out. We have a few more remarks about the WOLED SE panel itself. The change in panel construction compared with the previous generation affected how the screen handles reflections, and unfortunately it's not a change for the better. Reflections are more noticeable than on earlier WOLED panels. LG Display tried to partly mask this effect with a more satin screen finish that scatters light, but that doesn't completely solve the issue. With a strong light source the reflection becomes quite large and a characteristic grayish halo appears around it. In photos it's clear that such a reflection can take up a large part of the image and strongly affect how it's perceived. The S85H therefore doesn't really differ from cheaper OLEDs when it comes to daytime viewing. It performs best in the evening or in a room where you have at least partial control over the light. During the day it's still comfortable to use, but it's definitely not a TV designed for a very bright living room.

Panel details

Backlight Type
White LED
WRGB OLED
Software version during testing
1064
1204
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV Panel details
Review Samsung S85H TV Panel details

TV features

5.3/10

7.3/10

  • System
    Tizen
    Tizen
  • System performance
    Decent
    Very good
  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (VA) TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    Yes
    No
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Samsung U8092F – like all this year's models from this brand – runs on the Tizen operating system. The system itself is really well-developed: we have access to many applications (though not all), a well-developed smart home integration, and various extras, including exclusive Samsung apps. It also includes features like AirPlay and Chromecast, which make it easy to connect your phone to the TV and share media.

Unfortunately, as this is Samsung's cheapest series in 2025, the manufacturer did not include a solar remote control. In the package, we find a classic infrared remote control that visually resembles a newer version, but unfortunately lacks voice functions. Regarding typical "TV" extras – it lacks a recording feature and a PiP mode (picture in picture). On the plus side, however, is HDMI eARC, which allows for easy control with the included remote, for example, a decoder or soundbar – and it actually works seamlessly.

Tizen

Samsung S85H runs on Tizen, and it's hard to fault its online features. The system is fast, responsive, and the app selection is among the largest on the market. Besides the main streaming platforms, there are also plenty of less popular services, so it's unlikely you'll find yourself missing something essential. Samsung is also expanding SmartThings features, integration with other devices, and more AI-driven solutions. There are a lot of capabilities here, and some users will probably never explore even half of them. A big plus is the promised seven years of system updates. For a TV, which we usually keep much longer than a phone or computer, that matters. Tizen should therefore receive new features and fixes for a long time instead of being abandoned after two or three years. The S85H also doesn't feel like a budget model. We essentially get the same extensive ecosystem that Samsung offers in its higher-end TVs.

Traditional features

Samsung's approach to a TV's traditional features looks completely different. It's clear the manufacturer has been increasingly prioritizing "modern" services over traditional ones for several years. The S85H therefore isn't a TV that will particularly appeal to people who are used to full-featured regular TV operation. The included remote illustrates this well. It's small, minimalist, and has only the most necessary buttons, but no classic numeric keypad. For streaming this solution is convenient, but for frequent watching of traditional TV without a set-top box, not everyone will like it. It's simply a consequence of the direction Samsung is taking its TVs.

Apps

8.7/10

9.3/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.3/10

9.1/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

Samsung U8092F handles playback of files rather smoothly – the television supports most popular audio and video formats. Of course, it does not support Dolby Vision, but we simply won’t find that in any Samsung model.

Some reservations can be made about the support for external text files – those that the user would like to add as subtitles to a movie. During our tests, the television only played TXT files, and other extensions, such as SRT or SUB, unfortunately did not work. This may not be a problem for everyone, but it is worth knowing. Perhaps this is an issue to be improved in the future with a system update for the television.

The USB file player on the Samsung S85H works quickly and without major issues. The TV handles both videos and photos well, and for the latter we had no problems with unusual resolutions or a high number of megapixels. Subtitle support is also a plus; Polish characters display correctly and you don't need to change any settings. The only real shortcoming was the lack of support for HEIC, the image format commonly used by Apple devices. Aside from that, the built-in player performs very well and will be more than sufficient for most people for everyday use with a USB flash drive or external USB drive.

Sound

5.7/10

7.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    86dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

U8092F doesn't pretend to have a home theater on board. We get a standard set of 2 x 10 W, which sounds fine but without much excitement, though with a slight bass. For everyday viewing, such an audio setup is more than sufficient. We were pleasantly surprised that it was able to play a movie with the built-in Dolby Atmos codec (JOC) – although of course, we are not talking about true surround sound.

In terms of sound, the S85H hasn’t really changed compared with its predecessor. It still uses a fairly basic 2.0 system with a total output of 20 W, which sounds adequate and, for such a slim TV, can even add a bit of bass. That’s perfectly fine for everyday TV watching, but it’s not at the level of pricier models that can sound fuller and more "spatial." With that picture, adding at least a soundbar is a no-brainer. All the more so since the S85H supports Dolby Atmos and Samsung’s Q-Symphony, which lets a compatible Samsung soundbar work together with the TV speakers instead of replacing them entirely. If you want to get more from this setup when watching movies, external audio is the most sensible addition.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

86dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy