Samsung U8000F (IPS) vs XIAOMI A PRO 2026

Direct compare

Check the best price offer:

Samsung U8000F (IPS)
$378

U8000F / U8092F

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.4

5.6

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.9

    6.0

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    4.8

    5.7

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.8

    4.7

  • Gaming on console

    6.3

    6.2

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.0

    2.0

  • Watching in bright light

    3.4

    4.9

  • Utility functions

    5.3

    6.1

  • Apps

    8.7

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    5.7

    5.0

Advantages

  • Advanced Smart system: Tizen

  • Good viewing angles (IPS Matrix)

  • Great for text work - displays fonts excellently

  • Low input lag

  • Basic features for gamers - VRR and ALLM

  • VA matrix with good native contrast and decent black levels

  • Support for Game Boost mode at 120 Hz in 1080p and 1440p

  • Low input lag in 120 Hz mode

  • Google TV – a vast selection of apps and services

  • Wide color gamut coverage (about 94% DCI-P3)

  • Decent colors after SDR mode calibration

  • Support for popular audio formats (Dolby Atmos, DTS:X)

  • Large, clear remote control with a numeric keypad – convenient for seniors

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness

  • Very poor black and contrast (IPS panel)

  • Worse appearance than its predecessor

  • Infrared remote

  • Low brightness

  • No real support for HDR10+ and other more advanced HDR formats (e.g., Dolby Vision)

  • Significant limitations when working with PC – lack of chroma 4:4:4, heavy dithering, poor font readability

  • Poor viewing angles (typical for VA)

  • Clunky design, legs mounted in plastic with screws

  • Weird system issues – stuttering, errors with Miracast and audio switching

  • Upscaling and digital image processing are practically nonexistent

  • Very poor sound, practically no bass (we felt it performed worse than the "2025" model)

Our verdict

The U8000F is a very basic television that may find its buyers among those looking for the cheapest Samsung 4K with Smart TV. And that is exactly its purpose. Thanks to the Tizen system, this model really offers quite a lot in terms of smart features – the number of applications and possibilities may attract those who want a reasonably intelligent device at the lowest possible price. In terms of picture quality – it is average, which is not surprising in this class. Nevertheless, a few pluses can be found: fairly good viewing angles will work well for traditional TV watching from different parts of the room, and the basic features for gamers (like VRR and ALLM) may be sufficient for typical "Sunday" gamers. The PC mode also deserves a plus – the television handles displaying fonts very well, so it can also serve as a cheap monitor. Of course, this is not a model that can be recommended to everyone "sight unseen." But if someone is looking for an affordable Samsung with a 4K resolution and a solid Smart system, then the U8000F is just that kind of device.

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a television that at first glance doesn’t reveal significant changes compared to its predecessor. Someone might even think it's just a copy of last year's model with a different sticker. And there’s some truth to that, as the main novelty, or rather the only clear difference, is the 120 Hz mode at lower resolutions. It must be acknowledged that this addition really does make a difference – it's not a solution for professional gamers, but rather a nod towards those looking for a smoother picture during casual gaming. This is where the A Pro 2026 can shine – with a simple, yet clever idea that sets it apart in the "super budget" segment. Unfortunately, when we begin to look at the television more broadly, enthusiasm quickly wanes. Even though the year has changed in the calendar, most of the issues known from the A Pro 2025 remain with us – the system can still experience strange stutters, and occasional bugs can be quite annoying. Additionally, there is a lack of any serious tools for digital image processing that worked quite decently last year. As a result, there are many construction limitations visible here that competitors at a similar price point are already trying to mask in some way. As for the quality of the image, we won't be dishonest with you either. Brightness levels of 200–300 nits don't stand a chance against more demanding materials. Yes, simpler streaming content can be watched, but with high-budget productions, it’s immediately clear why the television costs what it does. The impression of watching a flattened image stripped of details accompanies us virtually every time. And here we come to the crux of the matter. Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a television for those who really do not require much. As a daily screen for series, news, or YouTube – it performs fairly well, especially thanks to its operating system, which is GoogleTV. Also, if someone is looking for budget equipment and additionally would like a taste of smoother gameplay in games thanks to the 120 Hz mode, they might even be satisfied. But anyone expecting at least average image quality, a stable system, and proper functionality will quickly notice that there are other budget models on the market that simply perform better.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
BuildQuality-Budget
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel colour
Black
Black
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

1.1/10

6.1/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

800:1

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

700:1

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

700:1

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

650:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,000:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,550:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

7,300:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,600:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,900:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail
Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

The Samsung U8000F, more specifically the U8092F model in the 55-inch version, is equipped with an IPS panel. Let's be honest – this is not the best choice when it comes to displaying blacks and contrast correctly. The results in this category are just poor. The contrast is abysmal, and watching dark scenes with any kind of "cinematic" effect is nearly impossible. Additionally, the fact that the television lacks local dimming doesn’t help, making it hard to achieve better results. The only thing that deserves praise is the fairly decent uniformity of the panel – but that's more of a small consolation. Overall, it's not good. If you care about deep blacks and reasonable contrast, it's definitely better to go for the variant with a VA panel, which performs significantly better in this particular series.

One of the biggest advantages of even a budget construction like the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is the use of a VA panel. It is responsible for quite decent contrast, which in our measurements fluctuated between 5000:1 and 7000:1. On the screen, this translates to a stable image with fairly deep blacks—something that is hard to find in competing models with IPS panels without local dimming. Xiaomi has also added the feature of global dimming for the entire panel. Sounds good, but... we advise you to turn it off right away. Why? Because the screen starts behaving very strangely in darker scenes—sometimes it dims so much that you can hardly see anything, and at other times it brightens up so much that the already dark blue black turns into a vivid blue. At that point, we had the impression that the TV was simply damaged. Fortunately, without this feature, the contrast presents itself really solidly. It is certainly not at the level of advanced TVs with local dimming, but in its price class, it will comfortably satisfy most users—especially if you are not watching in a completely dark room, but have at least a little light in the background, which effectively masks the imperfections of the "blue black."

HDR effect quality

3/10

4.1/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 81.0%, Bt.2020: 59.0%
DCI P3: 93.6%, Bt.2020: 71.7%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

191 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

224 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

241 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

79 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

234 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

220 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

248 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

322 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

315 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

326 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) HDR effect quality
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) HDR effect quality
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) HDR effect quality
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 HDR effect quality

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) HDR effect quality
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

XIAOMI A PRO 2026

HDR luminance

Samsung U8000F (IPS)

HDR luminance

Better does not mean good – and that perfectly summarizes the capabilities of the U8092F when it comes to displaying bright movie scenes in HDR mode. The brightness of the panel is just under 250 nits, which is definitely too little to enjoy any lighting effects. An interesting situation was noted during the measurement of the fourth scene from the movie Sicario 2 – the television clearly dimmed the entire screen in an attempt to achieve better black levels (which are still weak). One could even suggest that the device uses some form of "global dimming," but unfortunately, the results are still very poor. To make matters worse, the television does not support a wide color gamut – the coverage of the DCI-P3 space is about 80%, so there’s no hope for truly vibrant colors. HDR images here look rather like lightly brightened SDR, and that's the form we would suggest sticking to when it comes to this television.

If you are hoping for a cinematic HDR effect in the new Xiaomi A Pro 2026, you better quickly cool your expectations. This TV is simply too dark to fully convey the capabilities of contemporary movies or series prepared for the highest quality picture. Our measurements showed brightness in the range of 200-300 nits, which are values that suit SDR content more than ambitious HDR productions. In practice, this means that most movies look okay, but they definitely won’t give you the "wow" effect that other TVs deliver. Fortunately, not everything is lost – a plus here is the use of the PFS LED filter, which is a solution similar to the quantum dot known from QLEDs. Thanks to this, the coverage of the DCI-P3 color gamut reaches about 94%, resulting in vibrant, saturated colors in the vast majority of materials.

Factory color reproduction

6.5/10

3.5/10

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Factory color reproduction
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Factory color reproduction
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

The Samsung U8000F was tested in the best possible picture mode built into the TV, which is Filmmaker Mode. This mode should – at least in theory – offer a cinematic, reference-quality image without unnecessary enhancements. For SDR content (mainly HD/SD), the TV performed surprisingly well straight out of the box. White balance errors hovered around a value of 3, which is roughly at the threshold of perception. The only complaint could be about brightness management – the gamma chart showed a slight tendency to brighten or darken certain areas, but overall it performed quite well for this price segment.

Unfortunately, it looks much worse in HDR mode. Although the white balance wasn't terrible, the TV had significant color errors – particularly noticeable on the Color Checker chart, where almost every sample landed outside the target point. The HDR image simply looks unnatural, and colors can be shifted, dull, or too cool. This largely stems from the fact that the U8000F does not support a wide color gamut (DCI-P3). The TV is physically incapable of displaying accurate colors in HDR standard – and this unfortunately shows in every more demanding material.

What we saw in Filmmaker mode surprised us greatly – and unfortunately not in a good way. The mode advertised as Hollywood standard resembled more of a display in a store window. The white balance was shifted towards blue, leading to huge color errors and the effect of washed-out scenes in SDR content. It was a little better, though far from perfect, in HDR materials. There, problems were also visible – color saturation and the entire palette consistently shifted towards cooler tones, which made the image appear more artificial and cold rather than cinematic. In other words: even in Filmmaker mode, which should be the showcase of this television, we got a result far from expectations.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.5/10

7/10

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Color reproduction after calibration
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Color reproduction after calibration
Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Color reproduction after calibration
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Color reproduction after calibration

Although the U8000F offered quite a decent picture in SDR right out of the box, we were able to adjust it a little more. We managed to eliminate a slightly purplish tint and calibrate the gamma to a more reasonable level. However, the television still tends to overemphasize the smallest and brightest parts of the image – the gamma chart shows a characteristic "dip" that is difficult to completely correct.

Unfortunately, the situation looks worse in HDR. It's hard to talk about any significant improvement here – the television is simply not designed for HDR content. We tried to adjust the picture in the advanced settings, but despite everything, the color errors remained quite large – a delta E above 7 indicates noticeable deviations. It's a bit of a shame, but that's the charm of a budget design. In SDR, the U8000F performs just fine, while HDR is simply not its league.

Even though Xiaomi is not a brand associated with top-of-the-line televisions, it must be acknowledged that even in a budget model like the A Pro 2026, the manufacturer left quite a few calibration settings. After a few adjustments, the SDR picture gained a completely new character. The colors stopped veering into blue tones, the whites became more natural, and most errors dropped to a practically invisible level. As a result, SDR content looked very good, surprisingly so for this price range.

It was somewhat different with HDR material. Here, it was immediately noticeable what we had already mentioned - the overexposure of bright scenes and issues with balance control. Calibration only helped partially because the limitations of the panel itself played a role. However, it should be emphasized that in the case of SDR, the television transformed beyond recognition, and in a decidedly positive direction.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9/10

9.3/10

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Smoothness of tonal transitions

Another important thing to pay attention to when assessing image quality is the smoothness of tonal transitions – that is, how well the television handles blending colors and shades. Here, the Samsung U8092F performs... almost perfectly. On the tested screens, there are no visible banding issues, no problems with color gradients, and the overall image is not artificially sharpened, which unfortunately happens in many televisions of this class. The image looks natural and very clean. We noticed minimal issues with the brightest scenes, but that’s more of nitpicking that only a very discerning eye would catch.

The television really handles color blending well, and in most scenes, it's hard to find any imperfections. This is best seen in the bright parts of films, where tonal transitions look almost perfect, making the image smooth and natural. Darker scenes are a bit worse; in them, characteristic banding can be noticed. Fortunately, this is not a flaw that stands out and will remain virtually unnoticed by most viewers.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5/10

3/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
No
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

When it comes to how the Samsung U8000F handles lower-quality materials, we have to admit that Samsung has made progress compared to its predecessor from last year – the DU7192 model, which theoretically occupies the same place in the lineup.

This year's model is equipped with a function to improve the fluidity of tonal transitions, which has been implemented much better than last year. Yes, the television still uses quite strong algorithms that can distort details or remove film grain, but even so – it can be confidently said that it works effectively.

However, not everything went perfectly. The U8000F has noticeable issues with slight frame cutting when watching very old content in very low resolution. If someone plans to play their old VHS tape, they should be prepared for the image to appear slightly “cut off.”

Upscaling and digital image processing in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 are not among the strengths of this model. One might expect that since the TV wasn’t designed to achieve record brightness levels, the manufacturer would have opted for a more robust processor and a set of features that would "enhance" lower quality images. Unfortunately – we were also quite disappointed here. On the plus side, there is reasonably decent upscaling that handles HD materials and elevates them to 4K in an acceptable manner. However, this is where the list of advantages ends. The TV does not offer any features to improve tonal transitions or smooth out digital imperfections, so in most cases, we get a raw image, exactly as we deliver from an external source. On a large screen, this lack of support makes lower quality materials look simply bland. An additional problem is the phenomenon of overscan. When watching older materials, it sometimes happens that part of the image is cut off, which only intensifies the impression that Xiaomi still has a lot to catch up on in this category.

Blur and motion smoothness

6/10

4.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
-
No
Brightness drop with BFI
48%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Smużenie ():

Smużenie (1440p@120Hz):

The Samsung U8000F is equipped with a 60 Hz panel, so right from the start, it’s clear that we shouldn’t expect any miracles. This is simply the standard in this class – sufficient for everyday viewing, but without any fireworks.

The TV offers one motion smoothing slider – a feature called "Motion Blur Reduction", which allows us to adjust the smoothness of the image in movies. Higher settings provide a more "theatrical" and smoothed effect, while lower settings help retain the original character of the film with a slight 24p effect. Interestingly, there is a feature called "Clear Motion LED", which is a BFI mode – that inserts black frames between the frames of the picture to improve motion clarity. However, in practice, the screen flickers significantly when activated, and it should be regarded more as an experiment than something that realistically enhances gaming comfort.

The motion fluidity in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is an interesting compromise that results from the hybrid matrix used here. At the native resolution of 4K, the maximum refresh rate is 60 Hz – sufficient for those who mainly watch movies and series. It is precisely for them that the manufacturer added a motion smoother, allowing users to adjust the image to their own preferences – one can opt for greater fluidity or leave the more "cinematic" frames depending on the settings.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4/10

3.6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    No
  • VRR
    Yes
    No
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    No
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    No
    Yes

Samsung U8000F offers a basic set of features for gamers, which nonetheless may be sufficient for less demanding users. We have an automatic game mode here – when a game is launched on the console, the TV automatically switches to low latency mode, which significantly improves response time. We also find the VRR feature, or variable refresh rate, which operates within a range of 48 to 60 Hz. This means that both Xbox and PS5 will not produce the "tearing" effect, as long as we stay within this range.

And unfortunately, that's about it for the advantages. Add-ons like Game Bar or higher refresh rates are reserved for the higher models of Samsung from the 2025 line. In theory, the TV also supports the HGiG feature, which should adjust HDR images to the intentions of game developers. Unfortunately – even though this feature appears in promotional brochures and store materials – its configuration on the Xbox console turned out to be... impossible in practice.

Indeed – since Xiaomi has added the "Game Boost 120 Hz" feature here, one might expect that they would follow up with a solid gaming package. Unfortunately, reality quickly dampens that enthusiasm. Aside from this mode (which, it must be said, is a great addition in a budget build), we have just a rather bizarre player panel. It's hard to call it a fully-fledged "game bar" – it's more of a simple overlay on the TV Menu with limited options. And that would be about it. There is no ALLM, so the TV won't automatically switch to game mode. There is no VRR, so you can forget about smooth frame synchronization. We also won't find support for Dolby Vision in games or the HGiG format, which are becoming increasingly standard on consoles. In short: apart from Game Boost 120 Hz, which does indeed make playing more enjoyable in 1080p or 1440p, the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 offers nothing particularly appealing to gamers.

Input lag

10/10

9.5/10

SDR

1080p60
12 ms
16 ms
1080p120
8 ms
2160p60
12 ms
25 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
12 ms
25 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

The Samsung U8092F performed phenomenally in our input lag tests. Regardless of the resolution or mode, the results were very low, which is truly impressive for this price range. It can be safely said that gaming on this television will not cause irritation due to significant delays between what we do on the controller and what we see on the screen. For most gamers, even those who are more demanding, this result should be more than satisfactory.

The input lag on the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is quite decent and certainly not its weak point. The best results were achieved in 1080p@120 Hz and 1440p@120 Hz modes – there the TV drops below 10 ms, which can easily be called a phenomenal result and sufficient even for more demanding gamers. The situation changes with 60 Hz content – the input lag then rises to around 25 ms. While these may not be the best values on the market, they will be fully acceptable for casual gaming or for an evening console session. Especially since in most cases it is still worth enabling the 120 Hz mode, which is the most beneficial for gamers.

Compatibility with PC

6/10

2/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Very Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Average
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
12ms
25ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No
Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Compatibility with PC
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Compatibility with PC

Working on a computer using this TV is a real pleasure. The Samsung U8092F supports chroma 4:4:4, and thanks to the layout of the sub-pixels in the IPS panel, text readability – regardless of color or size – is very, very good. The TV is also suitable for occasional gaming on PC, mainly due to its low input lag. However, one must keep in mind that the G-Sync feature does not work on this model, which is strange because VRR worked without any issues when it comes to the console.

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 as a computer monitor? There's no beating around the bush – it's very bad. While you can still utilize the 120 Hz mode in lower resolutions for gaming, the TV is completely unsuitable for everyday work. It lacks full support for chroma 4:4:4, so fonts are blurry and sometimes even rainbow-colored. Additionally, there's strong dithering that makes the image look uneven – some pixels shine brighter, others dimmer, and vertical lines can even break apart. In practice, this means that text (especially colored and on a dark background) becomes difficult to read. Light text manages to hold up somewhat, but it's hard to talk about any comfort here. In this category, we give Xiaomi A Pro 2026 a rating of 2/10 (+1 for the additional high refresh rate mode), and there's really no point in dwelling on this any longer.

Viewing angles

7/10

3/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
34%
63%

The viewing angles on the Samsung U8092F are very good – as is expected from an IPS panel. The picture doesn’t lose much in brightness or color saturation, even at greater angles from the axis. Of course, it's not on the level of organic screens – but it’s entirely sufficient for comfortably watching the image at an angle, e.g., from the side of the sofa.

The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 uses a VA panel, which immediately suggests that viewing angles are not its strong suit. Looking at the screen from the side, we quickly notice a loss of quality – colors noticeably fade, and the whole image appears washed out. The drop in brightness may not be as drastic as in some constructions based on similar technology, but that doesn’t change the fact that this is clearly a weak point of this model. If we plan to use it as a large, cheap screen for the living room, we have to take this limitation into account.

TV efficiency during daytime

3.4/10

4.9/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Average
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good
Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) TV efficiency during daytime
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV efficiency during daytime
Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) TV efficiency during daytime
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV efficiency during daytime

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

XIAOMI A PRO 2026: 334 cd/m2

Samsung U8000F (IPS): 218 cd/m2

Thanks to the satin coating of the Samsung U8092F matrix, it handles glare quite well. The screen does not act like a mirror, and the colors – considering the capabilities of this class of devices – remain fairly saturated, even in somewhat brighter conditions. Unfortunately, the coating itself cannot perform miracles. The television is simply too dark to effectively penetrate very challenging lighting conditions. If we place it in front of a light source (e.g., a large window or a strong lamp) – unfortunately, one must consider that not everything will be clearly visible on it.

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 performs quite well during the day. The display has a satin finish that can somewhat reduce reflections, so the colors do not lose their vibrancy, even when the room is bright. Just keep in mind that this is not a super-bright screen – the average brightness is around 350 nits. In a regular, moderately sunny living room, it's sufficient, but if you have large windows that let in a lot of sunlight, it may simply be difficult without shades or curtains.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
White LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
T-KSU2EFDEUC-0090-1064.4, E2500007, BT-S
UKN1.240806.017.V816.0.25.5.13.621.4.URTMIXM
Image processor
4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1530 MHz

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) TV details about the matrix
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV details about the matrix

Samsung U8000F (IPS)

XIAOMI A PRO 2026

TV features

5.3/10

6.1/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) TV features
Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features

Samsung U8092F – like all this year's models from this brand – runs on the Tizen operating system. The system itself is really well developed: we have access to many applications (though not all), a well-developed smart home support, and various add-ons, including exclusive Samsung apps. There are also features like AirPlay or Chromecast, which make it easy to connect a phone to the TV and transfer multimedia.

Unfortunately, since this is Samsung's cheapest series in 2025, the manufacturer did not decide to include a solar remote. In the package, we find a classic infrared remote, which visually resembles a newer version, but unfortunately lacks voice functions. As for typically "TV" features – it lacks recording functions and PiP (picture-in-picture) mode. On the plus side, however, HDMI eARC works well, allowing you to easily control devices from the set such as a decoder or soundbar – and it really works seamlessly.

SmartTV - Google TV

The biggest advantage of the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is the Google TV system. It's what gives the TV a second life – you can run practically any app on it, from Netflix and YouTube to music services and even lesser-known programs from the Google Play Store. We are not limited to just what the manufacturer has pre-installed, as is the case with other budget TVs. Additionally, we have AirPlay, voice search through Google Assistant, and even integration with Gemini. We did experience some minor hiccups – for example, casting from a laptop didn’t always work – but despite such shortcomings, Google TV is a huge plus in this setup.

Classic TV Functions

The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 can be referred to as a "senior-friendly" TV. The large remote control with a numeric keypad and a fair number of physical buttons makes it intuitive to operate. Support for teletext and a clear EPG interface make using classic TV functions easier. We won't find many advanced features like USB recording or PiP, but the presence of an analog headphone jack can be surprisingly practical for some users. It gives the impression that this is a set of features tailored to the needs of the most traditional viewers.

System Stability

However, not everything works as it should. During testing, we encountered annoying system stutters, problems with Miracast, and issues when switching audio sources. There were even times when it was necessary to reset the TV by unplugging it. This just shows that although Google TV offers huge possibilities, stability in such a budget-friendly setup can still be very problematic.

Playing files from USB

9.3/10

6.8/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

Samsung U8092F handles playback of files rather smoothly – the television supports most popular audio and video formats. Of course, it does not support Dolby Vision, but we simply will not find that in any Samsung model.

There may be some reservations regarding the support for external text files – those that the user would like to add as subtitles to a movie. During our tests, the television only played TXT files, and other formats, such as SRT or SUB, unfortunately did not work. This may not be a problem for everyone, but it's worth knowing. Perhaps this is an issue to be improved in the future with an update to the television's operating system.

The built-in media player in Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a real enigma. On one hand, it plays most popular audio and video formats without major issues. On the other hand, it can stumble over basic things like Polish letters. Files with characters like ą, ł, ć, or ś in their names often do not want to open or are displayed incorrectly. It looks strange because we supposedly have codec support, yet when it comes to simple matters related to the alphabet, the television just gets confused. Fortunately, this is not a huge problem, as thanks to Google TV, we can simply install another player, such as VLC. Then the issue with Polish letters disappears completely, and using multimedia becomes hassle-free.

Apps

8.7/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Sound

5.7/10

5/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

U8092F doesn't pretend to have a home theater onboard. We get a standard set of 2 x 10 W, which sounds decent, but without much excitement, though with a slight bass. For everyday viewing, this audio setup is completely sufficient. We were pleasantly surprised that it was able to play a movie with the built-in Dolby Atmos codec (JOC) – although, of course, we're not talking about true surround sound here.

Last year, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 surprised us with really decent sound for a television in the super budget segment. Unfortunately, this year's edition – the A Pro 2026, has let us down across the board. The sound resembles the impression as if the device was playing underwater: flat, devoid of any bass or depth. The only plus remains the wide support for audio formats such as Dolby Atmos or DTS:X, but in practice, it doesn’t change much. If you're considering this television, you should immediately add a soundbar to the set, because without it, the audio experience will be quite disappointing.

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

81dBC (Max)

75dBC