Samsung The Frame Pro vs LG NANO81A / NANO80A

Direct comparison

Check the best price offer:

Samsung The Frame Pro
$3 197

The Frame Pro / LS03FW

Available screen sizes: 65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”86”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.3

5.7

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.8

    5.1

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.6

    5.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.8

    5.4

  • Gaming on console

    8.6

    6.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.4

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    7.0

    4.0

  • Utility functions

    7.7

    6.6

  • Apps

    9.3

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    6.4

    6.2

Advantages

  • Premium design – symmetrical frame, interchangeable frame customization, true image effect on the wall

  • Wireless One Connect module – no visible cables by the TV, easier space arrangement

  • Matte screen coating – no reflections even in bright rooms

  • High brightness ratio – up to 900 nits

  • Wide color gamut – QLED

  • Smooth tonal transitions, practically no banding

  • High motion fluidity – 144 Hz panel

  • Gaming features – VRR, ALLM, 144 Hz, Game Bar, low input lag (wired)

  • Tizen system – fast, intuitive, with a full suite of applications and support for AirPlay and voice assistant

  • Art Store – unique feature, TV as a digital picture frame

  • Mount included

  • Wide viewing angles (IPS panel)

  • Very low input lag (around 10-12 ms)

  • Smooth webOS 2025 system

  • Intuitive Magic remote with cursor

  • Better color gamut coverage thanks to NanoCell filter

  • Excellent as a PC monitor (sharp text, Chroma 4:4:4)

  • Decent features for gamers (VRR, ALLM, HGiG)

  • Extensive calibration options and natural colors after adjustments

  • Good image processing and efficient scaling of older content

  • Noticeable bass in the sound

Disadvantages

No like
  • It's hard to call it a true Mini-LED – edge lighting

  • Poor viewing angles (they could be better for improved wall image quality)

  • No HGiG* feature

  • Flat sound, little bass. A soundbar will definitely come in handy

  • Issues with font legibility and significant lag (input lag) when using the wireless One Connect module.

*The HGiG feature disappeared with the latest TV update. We are monitoring the situation, and if anything changes in this regard, we will let you know.

  • Poor black and low contrast

  • Low brightness (about 250 nits – weak for very bright rooms)

  • Panel refresh rate only 60 Hz

  • USB player without support for HEIC files and very large photos (over 20 Mpix)

Our verdict

Samsung The Frame Pro 2025 is a television that brings a breath of freshness to the lifestyle model segment. Its design takes center stage – a symmetrical frame, the ability to easily change decorative frames, and above all, the image effect on the wall thanks to the matte coating and special mount. In everyday use, it makes a great impression, and the Art Store feature combined with the high brightness of the screen means that the television works well not only as a display for movies and series but also as a decorative element in interior design. It is also hard not to appreciate the gadget-like addition of the wireless One Connect module – the ability to hide the box with ports anywhere in the living room provides significant design flexibility. In terms of image quality, The Frame Pro holds up quite well. Brightness levels of up to 900 nits in peak scenes allow for enjoyment of HDR effects even in brightly lit rooms, while the VA panel ensures stable and solid contrast. On the other hand, there are quite a few question marks. First and foremost – the naming. The designation "Pro" and the Mini-LED suffix suggest that we are dealing with an advanced local dimming system. However, in the 65-inch variant, we counted only 24 zones, all located at the bottom edge of the screen. You probably already know the effect after reading this review. Black levels and contrast are acceptable, but far from what Mini-LED televisions with full, dense backlighting provide. The issue of the wireless module also raises mixed feelings. While it indeed performs decently for connecting an amplifier or decoder, gamers and PC users will quickly discover that direct connection to the television via MICRO-HDMI is a necessity. Otherwise, they must contend with high input lag and worse font readability. Therefore, it is difficult to truly call The Frame Pro "Pro" in a strictly technological sense – it would be more appropriate to say it's "Frame Plus." A great lifestyle television, polished and visually striking, that will successfully fit into a bright, modern living room, but at the same time, it does not reach the level of quality we could expect from a product labeled as Mini-LED. It is a device that will delight with its design and additional features but will leave a slight sense of disappointment for those who expected a true breakthrough in image quality.

LG NANO81A is essentially a continuation of the NanoCell series, which has hardly changed over the past few years. Aside from a new operating system, a refreshed remote, and a few marketing additions, we are dealing with practically the same design that we have known for years. Thanks to the nanofilter, the TV is capable of displaying better, cleaner colors than standard budget TVs, and the IPS panel guarantees really decent viewing angles. Unfortunately, for these advantages, we pay a very weak black level and low contrast, which is immediately noticeable during nighttime viewings. Although webOS is still one of the best systems on the market, the biggest problem with the NANO81A is its price, which we simply do not understand. In 2025, this model faces enormous competition not only from brands like TCL or Hisense but... at LG itself. The model we tested earlier, QNED80A, is equipped with local dimming technology, has a brighter panel, and offers a wider color gamut. Interestingly, at the time of writing this review, the technically superior QNED80A is often much cheaper than the NANO81A. In this situation, the existence of the NanoCell model loses its meaning – unless wide viewing angles are your only priority, but in our opinion, the price you have to pay for them (at the cost of tragic blacks and a higher expenditure) is simply too high.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 5 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Average
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Black
Graphite
Stand
Fixed, Height adjustment
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand, Wall bracket, One Connect Box
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.7/10

1.5/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 24 (1 x 24)

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Samsung The Frame Pro Contrast and black detail

Result

6,250:1

Review Samsung The Frame Pro Contrast and black detail

Result

5,100:1

Review Samsung The Frame Pro Contrast and black detail

Result

4,650:1

Review Samsung The Frame Pro Contrast and black detail

Result

4,350:1

Review Samsung The Frame Pro Contrast and black detail

Result

4,300:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

800:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

850:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

750:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

Samsung The Frame Pro has officially been labeled as a Mini-LED backlit television, but… is it really? In the 65-inch variant we tested, we counted only 24 dimming zones. The number itself seems somewhat modest, but the more important aspect is their placement – all of them are located along the bottom edge of the screen. In practice, this means that The Frame Pro should be treated more as edge-lit rather than a full-fledged Mini-LED with dense, direct local dimming. Samsung has used a similar maneuver before, renaming the Q70 series to Neo QLED televisions – mainly for marketing purposes. How does this translate to picture quality? Black levels and contrast look decent, but there are no effects known from televisions with advanced local dimming like in the QN80 series. Much of this is due to the high-quality VA panel, which provides solid parameters on its own – a contrast ratio of about 5000:1 looks good and, importantly, is stable without significant fluctuations. However, if someone buys The Frame Pro hoping to experience “true Mini-LED,” they might feel disappointed. We ourselves expected this model to differentiate itself more from the classic The Frame series in terms of contrast quality; however, the differences turned out to be smaller or even nonexistent compared to what the “Pro” designation might suggest.

The NanoCell series, including the NANO81 model we tested, is based on an IPS panel. For anyone who has even a little knowledge about screens, this means one thing: significant problems with black levels and contrast. Our measurements are ruthless here. A result of 800:1 is, quite frankly, a tragic score. In practice, this means that what should appear on the screen as deep black looks like a dark gray blot at night. Watching dark films or series in a completely dark room will simply be torturous – the image will lose all its depth and will appear flat. If you decide to go with this model, we have one key piece of advice for you: don't watch it in complete darkness. To salvage the situation somewhat, it's best to leave a soft light on in the room, and the ideal solution would be to install an LED strip behind the television. Such wall lighting will trick your eye (this is known as simultaneous contrast) and make that grayness on the screen seem a bit darker. Nonetheless, the start of the test in terms of cinematic experiences looks bleak.

HDR effect quality

5.8/10

3.6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 92.2%, Bt.2020: 71.2%
DCI P3: 87.6%, Bt.2020: 65.3%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung The Frame Pro Brightness measurement

Result

745 nit

Review Samsung The Frame Pro Brightness measurement

Result

458 nit

Review Samsung The Frame Pro Brightness measurement

Result

476 nit

Review Samsung The Frame Pro Brightness measurement

Result

446 nit

Review Samsung The Frame Pro Brightness measurement

Result

660 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

228 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

168 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

252 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

LG NANO81A / NANO80A

Samsung The Frame Pro

Samsung The Frame Pro belongs to relatively bright televisions. In synthetic tests, we managed to achieve values around 900 nits, which, for a lifestyle model, is quite a decent result. In full-screen scenes, such as the frame from the movie The Meg or the opening sequence in Life of Pi, brightness remained at levels of 700–800 nits. These are values that allow you to fully enjoy HDR effects and capture their cinematic magic. However, the situation complicates when smaller, point light sources appear on the screen. The edge lighting used here, equipped with the ability to locally dim entire strips, does not handle them very well. It sometimes happens that small elements are excessively dimmed, which weakens the effect, or on the contrary – they are significantly brightened, but at the cost of losing black depth in that part of the image. This can be compared to light glows resembling the spread of a laser beam in dense fog – the effect is visible and bright, but at the same time, it is not very natural and distracts our attention. Fortunately, the color aspect performs better. Thanks to the use of a quantum dot filter (QLED), the colors are saturated, and the reproduction of the DCI-P3 palette exceeds 92%. In general, movies or series watched in HDR on The Frame Pro present a rich color palette, even if the contrast and the operation of the backlight algorithms can sometimes distract our attention.

If you're counting on HDR in the NANO81A to bring tears to your eyes, I have to disappoint you. This TV is simply too dark to show what this format is really about. With a brightness of just 250 nits, HDR here essentially exists only on paper. In practice, during a viewing session, it's very hard to distinguish whether we're watching high dynamic range content or regular SDR – it simply lacks that "punch" of light in bright areas of the image. But, to not have all criticism, we do have a glimmer of light at the end of the tunnel – and it’s quite clear. It's about color gamut coverage. Here, the NanoCell filter shows that it's not just marketing nonsense. Our measurements indicated that the coverage of the DCI-P3 space is around 88%. This is really a solid result that positions this model significantly above typical budget models based on regular white LED lights without any filters. Of course, it's still a bit lacking compared to the level of quantum dot TVs (QLED) or advanced panels with PFS filtering, but for this price range, the colors are surprisingly saturated and vibrant. It's just a shame that this low brightness doesn’t allow them to fully "spread their wings" with the Nano filter.

Factory color reproduction

5.5/10

5.3/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

The best results were, of course, achieved in Filmmaker mode, which immediately showed that Samsung paid attention to the factory settings. In SDR content – the type of content most often viewed – The Frame Pro performed really well. White balance and gamma were almost perfectly matched, making the image look natural and consistent. Yes, there were some noticeable errors, especially in skin tones and reds, which could be overly saturated, giving everything a slightly “warmed up” character, but in everyday use, this did not significantly affect the viewing experience. In the case of HDR content, the situation was similar regarding white balance. It was at a good level; however, the biggest problem turned out to be brightness management. The EOTF curve was set in such a way that in many scenes the image appeared to be overexposed, and the brightest areas lost details and turned into solid patches of light. This severely undermined realism and made the colors appear strongly over-sharpened. Fortunately, Samsung provides the option for manual adjustment of the curve in its televisions, so we opted for calibration, and its results can be seen below.

For every movie fan, the natural choice in LG televisions is the Filmmaker Mode. This mode is designed to display the image as the director intended – without unnecessary "enhancements." Unfortunately, in the case of our test unit NANO81A, the factory settings left something to be desired. The main issue turned out to be white balance. Measurements showed a clear deficiency of blue color, which practically translated to many scenes having a slightly yellowish, almost "too yellow" tint. The white was not perfectly clean, which detracted from the freshness of the image. Additionally, brightness management was not ideal either – the factory-set gamma was too low. The image often appeared oversaturated, as if it had been pulled too much from the shadows, losing its naturalness and depth. Fortunately, LG, even in this relatively low price segment, does not block access to advanced settings. The calibration capabilities of this model are immense, which is a big plus for those who like to "dig around" in the menu. We decided to approach the topic in our own way and see how much we could extract from this panel with professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.5/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, the SDR mode looks simply perfect. We managed to eliminate the overly strong red saturation that previously gave the picture a somewhat excessively warm character. The colors became more balanced, which translated to a natural and pleasant reception of daily content – from television to movies and series from streaming or materials on YouTube. In HDR mode, the EOTF curve required the most work, as it originally caused excessive burning of the entire image. Calibration largely helped to "tame" this problem – the image stopped being overexposed, and details in bright areas became more visible. Of course, the limits are set by the television's own design, as edge lighting reveals its limitations, and even the smallest elements of light can still be oversaturated or blend into the background. However, this is a matter of technology, not calibration itself. After the correction, The Frame Pro is much more enjoyable to watch, and it's definitely worth opting for if you want to make the most of your television's capabilities.

After calibrating the NANO81A, it's a completely different television. What LG offers in terms of image enhancement tools even in such an inexpensive model deserves a big plus. We were able to completely eliminate that annoying yellowing of whites and make the colors natural, juicy, and simply "true." In SDR content (such as regular TV, YouTube, or older films), the picture now looks infinitely better – it's clear, well-balanced, and no longer strains the eyes with strange hues. It's evident that this panel has considerable potential, which is simply wasted by poor presets out of the box. However, we have one serious reservation that calibration cannot fully overcome – it's about brightness management in HDR mode. The algorithm LG uses in this model is designed very conservatively. The television deliberately dims the image in HDR to avoid overexposing an already weak black from the IPS panel. The developers faced a choice: either provide more light and accept that black will turn light gray, or reduce the brightness to maintain any contrast. They chose the latter. Nevertheless, after our adjustments, watching anything on the NANO81 is significantly better.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.5/10

9.3/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

Here Samsung truly deserves immense applause. The Frame Pro has proven to be one of the best TVs of the year when it comes to the smoothness of tonal transitions. During testing, we were practically unable to detect any noticeable issues with color blending – the gradients looked smooth and natural, and the "banding" typical of many TVs simply did not appear. Yes, in very dark scenes, minimal imperfections can be noticed, but you have to really focus to see them – even the seasoned eye of our editorial team had trouble with this. Therefore, in everyday viewing, there’s no way anything will disrupt your experience. This is a huge plus because it’s in darker scenes that TVs most often struggle. You won’t experience that here.

The fluidity of tonal transitions is an element where NANO81A really shines. LG proves here that it can refine image processing algorithms even in its cheaper models. During testing, we practically did not record the phenomenon of banding, that is, the annoying "steps" visible where one color should smoothly transition into another. Everything looks incredibly natural and smooth. This is especially evident in the bright scenes from the movie Kingsman, where the backgrounds remain clean and free from digital artifacts. However, even more impressive is how the television handles the extremely challenging, dark, and foggy shots in The Revenant. Where many budget panels falter and deliver ugly splotches instead of a smooth mist, the NANO81A maintains its composure, offering very velvety transitions. The only downside is that with darker shades, you will notice the weaker blacks of this TV rather than any issues with color transitions.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

While the smoothness of tonal transitions in 4K HDR content on The Frame Pro is not a problem at all, naturally with weaker signal quality – from television, HD content, or older Full HD films – imperfections may occur. Therefore, it is crucial how the television handles these limitations thanks to its image processor. The noise reduction feature works really effectively here. At the medium setting, it eliminates unwanted bands or artifacts, smoothing the image in a noticeable but not overly exaggerated way. However, it should be noted that Samsung tends to operate aggressively – even at the lowest setting of this feature, it can "eat" film grain. It is therefore advisable to use it with caution and adjust the settings to the material being viewed.

The upscaling itself is at a high level. The Frame Pro can effectively upscale older materials to native 4K resolution while maintaining good sharpness and readability. Movies and series in lower quality simply look better here. However, it is worth mentioning a minor drawback – typical for many Samsung televisions. With very old sources of poor quality, you may notice cropping of the image edges on the left side of the screen. This is not a problem that will ruin the viewing experience, but it is good to know that it may occur.

It often happens that cheap 4K panels mercilessly bring all the "dirt" and imperfections of lower resolution materials to light. However, in the case of the LG NANO81A, the situation is quite different. It’s a really solid performer when it comes to handling content that is far from ideal. The built-in processor does a great job with upscaling. Even older recordings look quite decent on this screen – the image is coherent, cleaned of digital noise, and simply pleasant to the eye. A big plus is the gradation reduction feature that you will find in the settings. It is exceptionally effective in combating color banding, which is a lifesaver when watching low bitrate materials, for example from some streaming services or older files from the internet. However, it is worth maintaining a certain vigilance. Since we are dealing with a less efficient chip than in LG's top models here, too aggressive an adjustment of this option can sometimes result in minor artifacts or a slight blurring of details. Despite this risk, I definitely encourage experimentation with this feature – in many cases, it can save the viewing experience and make low-quality material fully watchable.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.8/10

4.6/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
70%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur ():

The smoothness of motion in The Frame Pro is ensured not only by the panel, which operates with a refresh rate of up to 144 Hz, but also by the image processor and the smoothing system. It is thanks to this that we can adjust the way we display movies or sports broadcasts to our own preferences. Available are sliders for motion blur reduction and judder reduction – the first function improves the sharpness of fast movements, while the second allows for softening the "jumping" image effect during camera pans. Therefore, everyone can choose between a cinematic character of motion and a smoother, more "television-like" style.

In terms of motion fluidity, the NANO81A unfortunately has a few drawbacks. The TV is based on a panel with a refresh rate of 60 Hz. If you're looking for perfect sharpness in dynamic football matches or fast-paced action games, you might feel somewhat unsatisfied. With such a low native refresh rate, fast-moving objects on the screen will always be a bit blurry.

Console compatibility and gaming features

8.2/10

6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Samsung The Frame Pro doesn’t pretend to be just a “living room” television; here, gamers will also find something for themselves. The manufacturer has ensured a full suite of gaming features: we have support for variable refresh rate (VRR), automatic low latency mode (ALLM), refresh rates up to 144 Hz, and compatibility with both G-Sync and FreeSync Premium Pro. Additionally, there’s the well-known Game Bar panel, which is a quick menu where you can check key parameters on the fly – from refresh rates to active image processing modes. Are there any downsides? Yes, The Frame Pro doesn’t support Dolby Vision in gaming mode, but it's hard to consider this a serious issue – most gamers use HDR10 anyway... so, the HGIG mode. Exactly. The biggest surprise turned out to be the latest software update. Samsung… completely removed this option from The Frame PRO. In practice, this means that the TV independently interprets HDR tone mapping in games, and the user has no ability to enable settings designed for consoles. This is a step backward that may disappoint more informed gamers expecting full compliance with HGiG guidelines. We just hope that this mistake will be quickly corrected.

Interestingly, The Frame Pro also features an atypical arrangement of HDMI 2.1 ports. We have as many as five available – four are located in the One Connect module, and the fifth, in micro HDMI version, is directly on the TV. This solution is quite unconventional, but very practical. Samsung clearly suggests that this is the port to connect your console or computer. Why? Because it minimizes potential delays associated with communication through the wireless One Connect, and in gaming, every millisecond matters. We wrote separately about input lag, but it can be revealed here that by connecting equipment directly to the TV, we achieve the absolute maximum response speed.

NANO81A is unfortunately not a device designed for e-sports. The lack of support for a 120 Hz signal is a fact that users planning to purchase this model must simply come to terms with. Nevertheless, LG engineers have worked hard to squeeze the maximum capabilities out of this 60 Hz panel, offering a set of features that genuinely enhance the gaming experience. Above all, the television supports VRR technology (in the range of 48–60 Hz) and ALLM. As a result, the image remains stable and does not "tear," and the device automatically switches to low-latency mode as soon as it detects a signal from the console. Managing these settings is incredibly simple thanks to a dedicated system overlay that allows for a quick overview of parameters without leaving the game. A significant advantage is the support for the HGiG format. This solution is crucial for owners of modern consoles, as it enables the TV to correctly "understand" the intentions of game developers regarding HDR tone mapping. In practice, this helps avoid the effect of "blown out" bright spots, such as clouds or light sources, which unfortunately is a common issue in budget LCD televisions.

Input lag

9.9/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
14 ms
13 ms
1080p120
9 ms
2160p60
14 ms
12 ms
2160p120
8 ms

HDR

2160p60
14 ms
12 ms
2160p120
9 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

The Frame Pro in wired mode achieves truly excellent results. Latencies range from 9 to 14 ms, ensuring smooth and instant reactions in games. These are values that can easily be considered reference – even in dynamic titles, the action unfolds without delays, and the controls are precise and predictable. The situation changes when the wireless One Connect module comes into play. While it allows for hiding cables and enjoying greater freedom of room arrangement, it significantly worsens input lag results. In tests conducted at a distance of 2 to 3 meters from the television, with no furniture obstacles, the values jumped to as high as 50ms. While this is acceptable for watching movies since input lag doesn’t concern us at all, it becomes problematic in games and greatly spoils the experience. It’s somewhat of a paradox – on one hand, we have a television that offers some of the best results on the market in wired mode, while on the other hand, Samsung promotes a solution that proves quite detrimental for gamers. And after all, the console is one of the key devices we usually connect to the television...

For the sake of order, we present our wireless measurements at a distance of 2-3m:

SDR

HDR

1080p60 Hz: 39

2160p60 Hz HDR: 40

1080p120 Hz: 25

2160p120 Hz HDR: 25

2160p60 Hz: 40

2160p120 Hz: 25

In terms of response speed, the LG NANO81A performs exceptionally well. The input lag we measured is about 12 ms. This is a very low result, which means one thing for a gamer – the delay between moving the joystick on the controller and the reaction on the screen is practically imperceptible. The television performs excellently in dynamic titles, where every millisecond matters, and in this regard, it does not fall behind significantly more expensive models.

Compatibility with PC

8.4/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
8ms
12ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Connecting The Frame Pro to a computer via a wired connection is basically no rocket science – it works as it should. The image is clear, the fonts look good, you can calmly handle everyday work in Word or Excel, and then launch a game and it’s still okay. The real fun begins when we use the wireless module. And this is where the entire paradox of this television comes out again – a solution that was supposed to make life easier in theory can actually make it quite frustrating in practice. It's not just about the aforementioned delays, which can be immediately felt when using the mouse, but also about the clarity of the image itself. The fonts start to look simply worse, at times you can see some kind of delicate stripes, and the letters lose sharpness, and suddenly working with text becomes simply exhausting. And it's really strange that such a simple thing as displaying letters on the screen can fall apart because of the wireless module. So if someone plans to use The Frame Pro with a computer – whether for work or gaming – it’s really worth connecting it via a wired connection right away. Because otherwise, you can become very quickly frustrated, and instead of enjoying the large screen, you’ll feel like your eyes are fighting with the television for every paragraph of text.

Nano81A is a really solid monitor for text work. Thanks to the IPS panel and proper implementation of Chroma 4:4:4, fonts are very clear and sharp – practically anyone will be satisfied with how this screen performs as a monitor. We only noticed one small detail that we caught with our laboratory scrutiny: vertical lines of dark text are slightly darker than those horizontal ones. However, this phenomenon is minimal enough that we decided not to deduct points for it. The ratings went down only for features typical for PC gamers – it lacks G-Sync support and high refresh rates above 60 Hz, which will be a significant drawback for those looking for a screen for fast-paced computer games.

Viewing angles

3.1/10

6.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
73%
66%

The Frame Pro uses a VA panel, and that immediately means that viewing angles are not one of its strengths. It’s enough to sit slightly to the side to see how the screen starts to lose quality – brightness decreases, colors fade, and blacks that look solid from a central perspective suddenly resemble more dark gray velvet than deep pitch. This is most apparent at about a 40–45 degree angle – there, the image clearly brightens, and color saturation drops significantly. Overall, this is nothing new, as most LCD televisions with VA panels behave this way. At the cost of better blacks compared to IPS panels, we get worse viewing angles.

This is the moment when the LG NANO81A can finally "breathe" and make up for the points lost in the black and contrast category. Thanks to the use of an IPS panel, the viewing angles are simply very good here. This is where the tested model gains the most and clearly shows its advantage over competing televisions equipped with VA panels. In practice, this means that the image does not lose quality, even when viewed from a wide angle. This makes the NANO81A a great option for those who have a wide furniture layout in their living room or frequently watch games and movies with a larger group.

Daytime performance

7/10

4/10

Panel finish
Matte
Satin
Reflection suppression
Very Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

LG NANO81A / NANO80A : 247 cd/m2

Samsung The Frame Pro: 614 cd/m2

The Frame series has stood out for almost a few years with its matte display coating, and The Frame Pro from 2025 is no exception. It is precisely because of this that you can be assured that light reflections will not annoy you even in a brightly lit living room. Samsung has refined this technology to near perfection over the years, and today, it can confidently be said that this is the best matte display we can find in televisions. Colors still look good and do not drastically lose saturation, as is the case with cheaper, Chinese designs. Black also remains at a decent level, although it must be admitted that in extremely bright lighting conditions, colors may slightly flatten and lose depth. However, this is a small price to pay for the complete lack of reflections on the screen – and this can be priceless in everyday use. Plus, the brightness must also be noted – about 600 nits in SDR mode makes the picture easily cut through daylight, and it will look satisfactory in most rooms.

NANO81A is a relatively dark television, so it works best in rooms where you have control over the lighting. With a brightness reaching around 250 nits, it is hard to recommend it wholeheartedly for very bright, heavily sunlit living rooms – under such conditions, the image will simply lack punch. Nevertheless, LG deserves a small plus for the screen finish. The satin panel used here dampens reflections quite decently. As a result, even if there is a bit of light in the room, you won't see reflections of every detail from your surroundings on the screen. So, if you can slightly close the blinds, a daytime viewing experience will be quite possible, but this model was simply not designed to "fight" against full sunlight.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
White LED
Software version during testing
T-RSMFDEUC-0090-1126.0, E2500007, BT-S
33.21.62
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung The Frame Pro TV Panel details
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV Panel details
Review Samsung The Frame Pro TV Panel details
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV Panel details

Samsung The Frame Pro

LG NANO81A / NANO80A

TV features

7.7/10

6.6/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 5 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung The Frame Pro TV features
Review Samsung The Frame Pro TV features
Review Samsung The Frame Pro TV features
Review Samsung The Frame Pro TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features

Smart Features

Samsung The Frame Pro runs on the Tizen system, which has been the hallmark of the Korean manufacturer for years. It is one of the most refined smart TV environments – fast, stable, and intuitive. It virtually includes all popular streaming applications, and the interface operates smoothly and without significant delays. Features such as AirPlay 2, screen mirroring, and voice control of the TV using Bixby, Alexa, or Google Assistant are also supported.

TV Functions

When it comes to classic TV functions – as in almost every Samsung – this is not the device's strongest aspect. We receive a clear EPG guide, teletext support, the ability to connect headphones via Bluetooth, and that's about it. We won't find more advanced tools known from TVs (e.g., USB recording or PiP). However, this is standard in Samsung's offering. The manufacturer has been setting trends for several years and focuses mainly on smart features, while traditional television is somewhat neglected.

Art Store and Interchangeable Frames – A Unique Element of the Series

What has distinguished the series The Frame since its inception is the Art Mode and the Art Store application. Thanks to it, we can display reproductions of artworks on the screen, ranging from classics to modern graphics. The service is indeed paid (in the form of a subscription or a one-time annual fee), but it ensures that the materials are prepared in the highest quality, making the displayed images look almost as if painted. This element, along with the option to change the TV's frames, makes The Frame Pro serve a dual purpose as a television and a stylish interior design element.

Wireless One Connect Module

The second unique element of The Frame PRO is the wireless One Connect module, which includes all HDMI ports and other connections. This allows the TV to hang on the wall almost like a real painting, while all the electronics and cables can be placed in a separate box positioned even a few meters away. The device is powered via USB-C and takes over all the "thinking" processes of the TV. While this solution has its limitations for gamers or those using PCs (latency, deterioration in font quality), it works great for connecting amplifiers, decoders, or individual multimedia devices. It's a very "gadgety" solution, but in everyday use, it proves to be simply convenient and allows for better arrangement of space in the living room.

Smart Features: WebOS

One of the biggest advantages of the NANO81A model is its “brain,” which is the operating system. LG has implemented a full-fledged WebOS version for 2025, which in terms of fluidity and user experience is on par with the more expensive models of this brand. Applications launch smoothly, and navigating the menu is a pure pleasure – there is no sign of irritating lags that often occur with budget competitors. All of this is thanks to the unique remote control with a pointer (cursor) function, which has undergone a visual makeover this year. The manufacturer has opted for minimalism – the new Magic remote is significantly smaller and more ergonomic than its predecessors. It sits perfectly in the hand, but this change has a downside as well. The physical number pad has completely disappeared from the casing. For younger users, accustomed to streaming and selecting tiles, this will not be a problem. However, older household members, who are used to entering channel numbers from memory, will have to change their long-standing habits.

Everyday Use

In terms of features we would call “classic,” the NANO81A relies on proven standards. It is not a multimedia powerhouse that will surprise you with exotic additions, but it performs flawlessly in everyday television tasks. The handling of traditional terrestrial or cable television, including the old good Teletext, is correct and intuitive. Wireless communication also deserves praise. The Bluetooth module works very reliably, allowing for quick and stable connections to game console controllers or wireless headphones and speakers. It’s simply a TV that “works” – it is stable, predictable, and does not create unnecessary complications in daily use.

Apps

9.3/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The Frame Pro handles multimedia playback from a USB drive correctly. Most popular movie, music, and photo formats work without major problems, and the TV manages them efficiently. During tests, we noticed only one inconvenience – files in HEIC format, which is a standard used by Apple, do not open even though the system sees them and displays them in the player. For those who often transfer photos from an iPhone, this may be a minor inconvenience, but apart from that, the player does its job well, and it's hard to have significant complaints about it.

Many users still use their own USB drives to display movies or photos on the big screen. In this regard, the NANO81A performs quite decently – the built-in player supports a wide range of video and audio codecs, so most movie libraries will start up "right away." However, it is important to remember the specifics of the WebOS system. Since it is a closed environment, we are limited to what the manufacturer has prepared for us. There is no possibility of installing alternative players (like the popular VLC), so if the system player cannot handle something, there is not much that can be done about it. During tests, we encountered a few specific limitations. Above all, there is a lack of support for HEIC files. If you take photos with an iPhone and want to view them directly from the USB drive, the TV simply will not see them – it's worth changing the format to JPG on your phone right away. We also noticed that the player has difficulty processing very large graphic files. Photos with a resolution of around 20–28 Mpix may not load or cause system errors. Aside from these exceptions, daily multimedia handling is hassle-free.

Sound

6.4/10

6.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    84dB
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

The sound on The Frame Pro is not one of this TV's strongest features. Its slim design means there's virtually no bass, which makes the overall audio sound a bit flat and average. On the other hand, the TV plays loudly – it can easily fill a medium to larger room. Dialogues are clear, but when it comes to special effects or music, there’s a lack of depth. This is definitely a piece of equipment for which it's worth buying a soundbar, preferably from the designer Samsung S series. Thanks to decorative frames, it can be matched to the decor alongside ChooseTV.

When it comes to audio, the LG NANO81A pleasantly surprises compared to its higher-positioned sibling, the QNED80A model. Interestingly, NanoCell sounds slightly better, which is likely due to its somewhat thicker casing. The increased volume allows for the extraction of some low-end nuances – the bass may not be powerful, but it is more distinctly defined than in thinner constructions. However, one shouldn't expect miracles. It is still a standard 2.0 speaker arrangement with a total power of 20 W, so the overall sound characteristics remain similar to other models in this price range. The mid and high tones are acceptable, making dialogues in movies and news programs clear. While this slight improvement in the lower registers is pleasing, for true home cinema or music listening, it is still worth considering the purchase of at least a simple soundbar.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

84dBC (Max)

75dBC

81dBC (Max)

75dBC