Samsung S90H (WOLED) vs Samsung S85H

Direct comparison

S90H / S92H / HAE / HAT

Info

S85H

Available screen sizes: 42”48”55”65”83”

Available screen sizes: 48”55”65”77”83”

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

8.4

7.9

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    8.6

    8.0

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    8.8

    8.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    8.5

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    9.7

    9.6

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    7.6

  • Watching in bright light

    6.5

    5.1

  • Utility functions

    7.3

    7.3

  • Apps

    9.3

    9.3

  • Sound quality

    8.4

    7.2

Advantages

  • Perfect black and infinite contrast (OLED)

  • Very high HDR brightness (up to 1400 nits)

  • Effective anti-reflective coating (matte, glare-free)

  • Exemplary color reproduction after calibration

  • Excellent motion handling (no motion blur)

  • Outstanding for gamers (4x HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, low input lag)

  • Game Motion Plus feature

  • Refresh rate up to 165 Hz

  • Wide viewing angles

  • Fast, fully featured Tizen

  • Good sound

  • Perfect blacks and infinite contrast with OLED

  • Good HDR brightness up to around 800 nits

  • High image fidelity after calibration

  • Very smooth motion thanks to a 120 Hz OLED panel

  • Rich set of features for gamers: VRR, Game Bar, low input lag

  • 4 HDMI 2.1 ports with full 48 Gbps bandwidth

  • Feature-rich, smooth-running Tizen system

  • Solar-powered remote with many features

  • Support for Dolby Atmos surround sound

Disadvantages

No like
  • In bright light colors lose some depth (a trait of matte coatings)

  • Lacks TV features such as USB recording or PIP

  • No support for DTS:X (an issue for Blu-ray disc fans)

  • Limited color saturation compared to the QD-OLED variant

  • Worse reflection suppression than its predecessor, a characteristic of the new OLED SE panel

  • Average SDR brightness, best suited for a room with controlled lighting

  • No DTS:X support, mainly a drawback for Blu-ray collectors

  • No Dolby Vision, not necessary but would be nice 🙂

Our verdict

Samsung S90H is a TV that simply makes a spectacular impression. The combination of OLED's absolute blacks, high brightness, and excellent motion sharpness delivers a picture that's hard to look away from. And that's exactly what we expect from a good OLED TV. The matte anti-reflective coating also works very well. Reflections on a sunny day stop being a major problem, and thanks to the presence of a traditional polarizer black doesn't shift as much toward grayish-burgundy tones as with the QD-OLED variant. Add to that the blazing-fast Tizen, an excellent set of gaming features led by Game Motion Plus, and surprisingly good, full-bodied sound from the built-in speakers. Any weaknesses? Of course. Tone transitions aren't quite as perfect as on QD-OLED, and viewing angles remain slightly worse. In practice, though, these are mostly minor quibbles, especially since WOLED also has its own advantages, particularly in a bright room, where it preserves black levels and color saturation better. Overall, the QD-OLED variant still comes out slightly ahead, but this time the difference isn't as pronounced as it was a year ago. For most people that won't be the deciding factor when choosing a TV. So our advice is: rather than obsessing over the panel type, pick the size that best fits the room. Whether you buy the WOLED or QD-OLED version, you'll get a mature, versatile, and well-balanced TV. As every year, the S90H series has a guaranteed place among the most cost-effective OLEDs of 2026.

Samsung S85H is a very successful continuation of the S85 series and a TV that still performs its main role well: to be an affordable entry into the world of OLEDs. The biggest change from its predecessor is the use of LG Display's new OLED SE panel, but the overall character of this model remains practically unchanged. Its greatest strengths are still perfect blacks, very high contrast and a picture that can look truly excellent in the evening. Add to that good colors and the ability to achieve a high degree of fidelity to the director's vision. The S85H also works very well as a versatile TV. Gamers get four HDMI 2.1 ports, 120 Hz, VRR, very low input lag and Game Motion Plus, so there is little to complain about here. Tizen runs fast and is user-friendly, and the whole system clearly targets users who today mainly use Netflix, YouTube and other streaming services, while traditional broadcast TV is treated as an extra.

However, the new OLED SE panel is not without flaws. This is most noticeable when watching during the day, because its glare handling is worse than previous OLED panels. Its peak brightness is also not high enough for the S85H to perform particularly well in a very sunlit living room. It is still a TV that shows its strengths best in the evening or in a room with at least partial control over ambient light. And that is probably the best way to look at the S85H. It is not an OLED meant to break brightness records or compete with the most expensive panels. It simply aims to offer what people like most about the technology, but at a lower price. Perfect blacks, very good movie picture quality, excellent gaming features and a convenient smart system make the S85H one of the easiest ways to get into OLED without spending a fortune.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Good
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Base adjustment
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

10/10

10/10

Contrast:

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

Because the Samsung S90H uses an organic display, it deserves the highest possible rating for contrast and blacks. This, of course, applies to both market variants: the WOLED version we tested and the QD-OLED variant. Because each pixel is an independent light source and can turn completely off, the TV delivers absolutely perfect blacks and infinite contrast. In practice, this translates into stunning image depth and perfectly sharp separation of bright details from dark backgrounds. Any haloing effect (blooming), which even top LCD TVs with Mini LED backlighting still struggle with today, is out of the question here. You'll appreciate the true magic of the WOLED panel especially during evening viewing in a darkened room; dark parts of scenes gain a remarkable sense of plasticity, incredible three-dimensionality, and a wealth of details hidden in the shadows.

The switch to LG Display’s new WOLED SE panel practically changed nothing when it comes to black levels and contrast. And you couldn’t really expect any major improvement, because we’re still talking about OLED, a technology that can completely turn off each pixel individually. In practice this means perfect black and enormous image depth, especially in darker scenes. Black bars are truly black, there is no halo around bright elements, and contrast remains virtually infinite. Even very expensive Mini-LEDs with thousands of local dimming zones still can’t offer the same precision as the S85H. And that is its biggest advantage. The S85H may be Samsung’s cheapest OLED, but in terms of black levels it can deliver exactly the same as much more expensive models using organic panels.

HDR effect quality

7.7/10

6.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 99.4%, Bt.2020: 75.9%
DCI P3: 95.2%, Bt.2020: 70.9%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1374 nit

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1419 nit

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1570 nit

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1395 nit

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

713 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

733 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

744 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

837 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

755 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

404 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung S85H

Samsung S90H (WOLED)

Luminance of RGB colors

Luminance of RGB colors

The Samsung S90H in the WOLED variant is still an exceptionally bright TV for its price class, although it is slightly dimmer compared to the QD-OLED version. The difference is not as pronounced as in last year’s F series, where gaps could reach as much as 500 nits. Here the specs of both panels are very close, and differences in peak brightness are only about 100–150 nits. In small-area measurements, the S90H on the WOLED panel easily reaches levels close to 1500 nits. That headroom lets it portray HDR dynamics phenomenally—specular highlights, reflections or explosions have the right punch, just as the creators intended in the post-production studio. As with most OLED displays, when a very bright scene fills the entire screen, the protection systems that safeguard the panel kick in and brightness naturally falls to around 700 nits. It’s worth stressing that this is still an excellent result on the market, often noticeably better than many Mini LED screens in the same segment.

Color gamut coverage

The biggest difference between the two S90H variants lies in color reproduction and saturation. This stems directly from the different construction of the WOLED panel, which uses an additional white subpixel. As a result, colors at very high brightness don’t achieve quite the same intensity, and the volume of the wide color gamut is somewhat more limited than with QD-OLED. That said, in everyday use these differences will be hard for most viewers to notice. Our measured DCI-P3 coverage on the WOLED panel reaches nearly 99%, which means that in the vast majority of real film scenes both variants will deliver almost identical images. The true gap only appears in rarer, particularly demanding productions that use the ultra-wide BT.2020 gamut. Due to the WOLED panel’s design, coverage of that standard is about 15% lower compared to the S90HAT with a QD-OLED panel, so the brightest, heavily illuminated HDR colors may appear a bit less vivid.

Interestingly, the new WOLED SE panel has brought a slight improvement in brightness to the S85 series. In the same movie scenes the previous year's model stayed closer to about 700 nits, while the S85H can reach around 800 nits. Of course this isn't a change that completely transforms the HDR experience, but that extra headroom is noticeable especially with small highlights, reflections, and stronger special effects. Around 800 nits is already a very good result for an entry-level OLED and in most films it's enough for HDR to have the right impact. Bright elements can clearly stand out from perfect black, and that contrast still does most of the heavy lifting here. You should remember the typical limitation of organic technology, though. When a very bright scene covers a large part of the screen, brightness can drop by almost half. This is the result of the panel's protection mechanisms, which limit its power with large bright areas.

Colors

The S85H can produce very pleasant, saturated colors and in most HDR films it looks really good in that respect. We measured roughly 95% DCI-P3 coverage, so the palette most often used in movies is reproduced to a very large degree. Skin tones, greens, and stronger reds still have appropriate intensity, and during normal viewing it's hard to fault them. Only when you look more broadly at BT.2020 do the limitations of the new WOLED SE panel become apparent. Coverage was around 70%, a bit less than in previous-generation WOLEDs and noticeably less than in QD-OLED panels. In films this isn't a major loss, because most productions rarely use such highly saturated colors. You notice it more often in games, where developers are much more likely to employ more intense colors.

Factory color reproduction

7.6/10

7/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

In Filmmaker mode, which we strongly recommend enabling right out of the box, the S90H offers very good factory color tuning. Colors are natural and faithful to the filmmakers' intent, without the intrusive oversaturation found in more aggressive profiles. However, as is usually the case without full calibration, there can be unit-to-unit variation. In our test the white balance lacked a bit of the blue component, causing the image to lean slightly toward warmer, yellowish tones. This was most noticeable in bright scenes, such as the snowy sequences from Star Wars. Additionally, the gamma curve ran slightly low, around 2.2, which resulted in a slight boost to shadow detail. In HDR mode the tuning was a bit better, showing only a slight undersaturation in the red region.

To evaluate color we, of course, selected Filmmaker mode, and in SDR our S85H unit was very well calibrated out of the box. The biggest deviation appears in the white balance, where a bit of blue drops out as brightness increases. In practice this means whites and grays have a slightly warmer tint than they should. It's not a major error and during normal viewing it generally isn't very noticeable. Gamma also stays close to the reference value, so the image is neither overly bright nor unnecessarily dim. The S85H's SDR picture quality is therefore very good straight out of the box. A few more imperfections show up in HDR. Here the white balance shifts more as brightness increases, with blue becoming dominant and the red component noticeably lacking. That also leads to larger errors in some colors. These aren't yet distortions that completely change the character of the image, but compared directly with the reference the difference is easier to spot. Overall, Filmmaker mode is a very good starting point before professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

9.2/10

9.1/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After full calibration it can safely be said that the S90H in the WOLED version looks almost perfect. In SDR mode color reproduction errors drop to ultra-low levels, and Delta E values very rarely exceed 2. That's a phenomenal result, so if you care about perfectly faithful color reproduction it's definitely worth considering calibration. The calibrated HDR mode also performs very well, in which the white balance was stabilized and earlier deviations eliminated. After professional tuning it's really hard to find anything to criticize, because the TV delivers an image with almost exemplary naturalness and dimensionality. The slightly lower rating in this category compared with the QD-OLED variant is solely due to the previously described saturation limitation in extremely bright scenes; the tuning options and color fidelity themselves are at the highest level.

Calibration yields very good results on the S85H. First, the white balance can be set almost perfectly, which removes the slightly too-warm image cast that was visible earlier in SDR. Color reproduction itself also improves significantly; most errors drop to a very low level, and in everyday viewing it's hard to notice any visible inaccuracies. You can also improve a lot in HDR, although some issues remain due to the TV's inherent characteristics. The S85H doesn't always perfectly follow the brightness curve. The darkest areas are slightly boosted, and as you approach the panel's limits you can see small deviations in the brightest highlights. On top of that there's limited coverage of the wider BT.2020 gamut, which no calibration can of course overcome. Despite this, the end result is very good, and after calibration the S85H can deliver a well-tuned, natural image.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8/10

7/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The smoothness of tonal transitions is very solid here, and the WOLED panel variant has been noticeably improved compared with last year's F-series model. Annoying gradient errors and visible banding now appear much less often. Despite this clear improvement, it still does not reach the level represented by QD-OLED technology. In almost every direct comparison, the QD-OLED panel handles smooth transitions between shades a bit more precisely. In summary: regarding gradients, the WOLED panel is clearly better than in previous generations of these panels, but the QD-OLED variant still maintains a noticeable advantage in this category.

The smoothness of tonal transitions is definitely not a strong suit of the S85H compared with other OLEDs. It's most noticeable on bright gradients, where fairly distinct banding appears between successive shades. Instead of an ideally smooth transition you can see separate color bands, and you don't have to look hard to spot them. Gradients in motion look even worse. When gradients move the imperfections become more visible and the image looks simply average in that regard. Dark gradients are not perfect either. You can see unevenness there as well, so the problem isn't limited to the brightest parts of the image. Of course you won't notice this all the time in a typical movie, but scenes with large areas of similar color such as the sky, fog, a sunset or a dark background can reveal the panel's limitations. Compared with older WOLEDs there is still some improvement, but looking at the TVs we've tested this year the S85H performs averagely in this respect, much like its competitor the LG B6, which uses the same panel. This is also one of those characteristics where the difference versus last year's QD-OLED panel becomes very clear. QD-OLEDs handle smooth blending of successive shades much better and clearly beat the WOLED SE panel used here when it comes to gradation.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

7.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
No
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

When it comes to reducing posterization, Samsung has kept the same solutions as last year’s models. The dedicated gradient-smoothing function works quite well and can effectively mask unwanted tonal transitions, which can be useful on a WOLED panel that is somewhat prone to banding. However, keep in mind it acts aggressively. This mechanism, aside from removing artifacts, can clean up fine film grain and slightly soften detail. Ultimately it’s a matter of compromise, but if you care about an absolutely faithful reproduction, it’s safer to leave this option off.

There’s also no breakthrough in scaling. The S90H uses the same NQ4 Gen3 processor as its predecessor, so the quality of upscaling was almost identical. The chip sharpens lower-resolution material very well, extracting a satisfying level of detail. Samsung still hasn’t dealt with the old overscan issue. With some older recordings or archival material the image edges can be slightly cropped. It’s a minor flaw, but it’s a shame the manufacturer still hasn’t eliminated it.

For the S85H, Samsung used the same proprietary NQ4 Gen2 AI processor as in last year’s S85F, and in terms of digital image processing it performs quite well. Upscaling is one of this model’s strengths. Lower-resolution content is well sharpened, edges look natural, and the image doesn’t feel overly artificial. Just bear in mind a common Samsung quirk: at very low resolutions you can’t completely disable overscan, so the TV may slightly crop the left edge of the image. The "noise reduction" function, which smooths weaker tonal transitions, also works very well. The processor can effectively remove posterization and other imperfections visible in lower-quality material. However, you need to be careful with the strength of this feature, because Samsung can be fairly aggressive here. When it’s enabled, along with unwanted artifacts, fine image details such as the texture of skin or clothing can start to disappear.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.5/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
165Hz
120Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
50%
49%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@165Hz ):

Blur (4K@60Hz):

In terms of motion handling, the S90H is simply excellent. This year's panel offers a refresh rate boosted to 165 Hz, though in practice the benefit will be realized mainly by gamers connecting a powerful PC. For movies, TV series, or sports broadcasts, such a high refresh rate makes no difference and the picture looks exactly the same as at the standard 120 Hz. Regardless of the source, the OLED panel's lightning-fast response time does its job, so motion is clean and the ghosting or smearing seen on LCD screens simply doesn't occur here.

The S85H uses an OLED panel, so it performs excellently when it comes to motion blur. Pixels respond virtually instantly, so moving objects don’t leave the characteristic ghosting seen on some LCD TVs. This is especially noticeable with sports or fast-paced games, where the image stays very clean even during rapid motion. The panel runs at 120 Hz. That’s more than enough for movies, TV series, sports, or console gaming. It’s a bit of a shame Samsung didn’t include a higher refresh rate aimed at PC gamers, since more and more TVs now offer 144 or even 165 Hz at 4K. However, that doesn’t affect motion perception in films or sports. There’s also the classic motion smoothing feature with two settings, blur reduction and judder reduction. So you can choose whether films should keep their cinematic 24 frames per second or if you prefer to smooth them a bit. The S85H gives you plenty of flexibility here, and the interpolation works well and, with reasonable settings, doesn’t produce too many artifacts.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.6/10

9.6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 165Hz
    48 - 120Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Players should feel at home with the S90H, because in that respect Samsung left few reasons to complain. The TV has four HDMI 2.1 ports, each of which supports VRR, ALLM, and high refresh rates. There's also the Game Bar, a handy menu that lets you quickly check key parameters and change settings without leaving the game. Importantly, Samsung has also improved HGiG. In last year's models it could cause issues when used with a console, but in the S90H it now works as it should. What sets it apart from the competition is primarily Game Motion Plus. It's a special motion-smoothing mode designed for games, which works best with titles running at 30 or 60 frames per second. Motion becomes noticeably smoother, while latency remains at a reasonable level. In our measurements it was under 50 ms, so you can still play comfortably. That's important, because on many TVs turning on a similar smoothing mode causes such a large increase in input lag that controls start to feel noticeably sluggish. Samsung has managed to find a good compromise here. There's still no Dolby Vision Gaming, but in practice Game Motion Plus may prove to be a far more useful feature.

The Samsung S85H is very well set up for gaming, whether you connect a console or a PC. The manufacturer didn’t skimp on ports and all four HDMI inputs support full HDMI 2.1. That means you can use 4K at 120 Hz, VRR, and ALLM without worrying which input to plug your console into. With several devices that matters, because you don’t have to choose between a console, a PC, or a soundbar connected via eARC. The feature set itself is very comprehensive. The S85H supports VRR, FreeSync, and automatic switching to game mode, and Samsung offers its comprehensive Game Bar, which lets you quickly view key signal parameters and change settings without leaving the game. The only real omission is Dolby Vision, which will matter mainly to Xbox owners. That’s a typical trait of Samsung TVs. Game Motion Plus performs very well and is one of the features that have set Samsung TVs apart for years. It smooths motion in games running at 30 or 60 fps, but does so without as large an increase in input lag as traditional motion smoothing. In practice, with more relaxed games, racing titles, or action games this can really improve perceived motion, especially if you’re sensitive to low framerates.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
10 ms
10 ms
1080p120
6 ms
5 ms
2160p60
10 ms
10 ms
2160p120
6 ms
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
10 ms
10 ms
2160p120
5 ms
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

Input lag is another area that's really hard to fault. With a 120 Hz signal we measured only about 5/6 ms, which is truly a stellar result. After switching to even higher refresh rates the delay fell to virtually astronomically low values, practically imperceptible during gameplay. The Samsung S90H delivers absolutely top-tier results.

Samsung S85H also performs very well in terms of input lag. At 120 Hz we measured input lag below 5 ms, which is a level at which the TV's response to controls is practically instantaneous. At 60 Hz the delay is naturally higher, but still remains very low, about 10 ms, so in this respect the S85H gives little reason to complain.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

7.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
6ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RWGB
RGWB
Max refresh rate
165Hz
120Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

The S90H works great as a large-format PC monitor, and not just because of its full set of gaming features. NVIDIA G-Sync certification, low input lag, and support for refresh rates up to 165 Hz mean it pairs with typical gaming PCs without issues. In terms of motion handling and image sharpness in PC games, it’s hard to find any faults. The situation is a bit different for everyday office work, web browsing, or text editing. While fonts remain readable, the specific subpixel structure of the WOLED panel (with an additional white subpixel) can make itself noticeable. When sitting very close to the screen, letter edges and small interface elements may show slight colored fringes or appear slightly softened. This is a characteristic of WOLED panels. In practice, however, it’s not a major problem. We tested the 65-inch variant, which is naturally used from about a meter or more away. From that distance the effect practically disappears and does not interfere with daily work. It may be more significant in the smallest versions, such as 42 or 48 inches, which often sit on desks and are used from a few dozen centimeters away.

The Samsung S85H also works very well as a large PC monitor. Font readability is good, and from the typical distance you sit from a screen this size, text looks really good. You just need to remember the four-subpixel layout of the WOLED panel, which means that from very close up the edges of letters aren't quite as perfectly sharp as on a traditional RGB monitor. However, this is a characteristic of OLED technology itself and shouldn't be an issue in normal TV use.

The S85H also has a lot to offer PC gamers. It delivers 120 Hz, G-Sync support, very low input lag, and of course the lightning-fast response time of the OLED panel. The only thing that was really missing was the ability to run the panel at a higher refresh rate. More and more TVs already support 144 or 165 Hz at 4K, so an additional mode like that would be welcome here.

Viewing angles

7.6/10

7.5/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
31%
34%

Viewing angles on the Samsung S90H are very good and among the best on the market. That's thanks to the OLED panel, which when viewed from the side doesn't lose brightness or color saturation as quickly as many LCD TVs. The image therefore keeps its proper appearance for longer, which matters especially when you're watching TV with a larger group and not everyone is seated directly in front of the screen. Only at very extreme angles can you notice the advantage of QD-OLED panels. In their case viewing angles are practically perfect, while on WOLED panels the colors and brightness begin to shift slightly.

Viewing angles are one of the big advantages of the S85H and OLED panels in general. Even when you view the screen from well off to the side, the image still retains good contrast, brightness and color saturation. In this respect the S85H performs significantly better than practically any LCD or Mini-LED TV available today. Only QD-OLED panels actually do better, keeping colors even more stable at wide angles. However, you’ll only find those in higher-end models.

Daytime performance

6.5/10

5.1/10

Panel finish
Matte
Satin
Reflection suppression
Very Good
Average
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

Samsung S85H: 350 cd/m2

Samsung S90H (WOLED): 473 cd/m2

There is one thing, however, in which the S90H with a WOLED panel performs better than the QD-OLED version. It's about viewing in a strongly sunlit room. Thanks to the presence of a conventional polarizer, black doesn't shift here as much toward gray or a dark cherry tone as it does with QD-OLED panels. Combined with the new matte finish, this gives very good results. The image, even in strong light, retains more depth, and colors don't lose their vibrancy as quickly. That doesn't mean the screen stays completely black under all conditions. Under very strong lighting you can notice a slight purple tint, typical of WOLED panels. In the S90H it is partially muted by the matte coating and isn't as noticeable.

Ultimately both variants perform similarly in this category. WOLED does a better job of holding black in a bright room, but on the other hand delivers slightly lower SDR brightness. At times the difference compared with the QD-OLED version can be around 150 nits.

Samsung S85H is a moderately bright TV. In our measurements the average brightness in SDR was about 350 nits, so that should be enough for ordinary daytime viewing as long as the TV isn't placed in a very sunlit living room. In a moderately lit room the picture remains readable, but with large windows and light hitting the screen directly the S85H's capabilities start to run out. We have a few more remarks about the WOLED SE panel itself. The change in panel construction compared with the previous generation affected how the screen handles reflections, and unfortunately it's not a change for the better. Reflections are more noticeable than on earlier WOLED panels. LG Display tried to partly mask this effect with a more satin screen finish that scatters light, but that doesn't completely solve the issue. With a strong light source the reflection becomes quite large and a characteristic grayish halo appears around it. In photos it's clear that such a reflection can take up a large part of the image and strongly affect how it's perceived. The S85H therefore doesn't really differ from cheaper OLEDs when it comes to daytime viewing. It performs best in the evening or in a room where you have at least partial control over the light. During the day it's still comfortable to use, but it's definitely not a TV designed for a very bright living room.

Panel details

Backlight Type
WRGB OLED
WRGB OLED
Software version during testing
T-RSMHDEUC-0100-120 4.3, E4601200, BT - G. albo 1204
1204
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV Panel details
Review Samsung S85H TV Panel details

Samsung S90H (WOLED)

Samsung S85H

TV features

7.3/10

7.3/10

  • System
    Tizen
    Tizen
  • System performance
    Very good
    Very good
  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    No
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Classic TV

When it comes to ordinary cable or over-the-air TV, Samsung doesn't offer any revolutions compared with last year's model. Setting aside the marketing AI features, you simply get a solid, traditional package: a full set of tuners, a CI slot for a decoding card, teletext, and a convenient RF remote that doesn't require pointing directly at the screen. The problem is that the market competition offers exactly the same, and the S90H adds nothing new in this area. What's more, the PIP function, picture-in-picture, has been dropped from the S90 series. If you liked keeping an eye on the news in the corner of the screen while watching another program, you can't do that here.

Smart TV: Tizen

While it's hard to call anything new for traditional TV, Tizen in its 2026 version performs really well. The most important news is that the system runs incredibly smoothly and responds to commands without unnecessary hesitation. Any animation stutters or lag in menu navigation have disappeared. Even though it's Samsung's proprietary platform, rather than the Google TV many dislike, the app lineup is complete — you'll find absolutely all major VOD services here. Cloud gaming fans will also be pleased, because the gaming section has been heavily refined. For everyday Smart TV use, it's an exceptionally fast and mature environment.

Tizen

Samsung S85H runs on Tizen, and it's hard to fault its online features. The system is fast, responsive, and the app selection is among the largest on the market. Besides the main streaming platforms, there are also plenty of less popular services, so it's unlikely you'll find yourself missing something essential. Samsung is also expanding SmartThings features, integration with other devices, and more AI-driven solutions. There are a lot of capabilities here, and some users will probably never explore even half of them. A big plus is the promised seven years of system updates. For a TV, which we usually keep much longer than a phone or computer, that matters. Tizen should therefore receive new features and fixes for a long time instead of being abandoned after two or three years. The S85H also doesn't feel like a budget model. We essentially get the same extensive ecosystem that Samsung offers in its higher-end TVs.

Traditional features

Samsung's approach to a TV's traditional features looks completely different. It's clear the manufacturer has been increasingly prioritizing "modern" services over traditional ones for several years. The S85H therefore isn't a TV that will particularly appeal to people who are used to full-featured regular TV operation. The included remote illustrates this well. It's small, minimalist, and has only the most necessary buttons, but no classic numeric keypad. For streaming this solution is convenient, but for frequent watching of traditional TV without a set-top box, not everyone will like it. It's simply a consequence of the direction Samsung is taking its TVs.

Apps

9.3/10

9.3/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

9.1/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player easily handles most popular video, audio, and photo formats. The range of supported files is broad enough that the inability to install external apps like VLC is hardly a problem. However, we did encounter one serious bug when trying to open HEIC photos from an iPhone. The TV not only failed to display the files, it caused Tizen to completely freeze. The system stopped responding to the remote, and we had to unplug it from the outlet. This is a clear software bug that Samsung should patch as soon as possible in the next firmware update.

The USB file player on the Samsung S85H works quickly and without major issues. The TV handles both videos and photos well, and for the latter we had no problems with unusual resolutions or a high number of megapixels. Subtitle support is also a plus; Polish characters display correctly and you don't need to change any settings. The only real shortcoming was the lack of support for HEIC, the image format commonly used by Apple devices. Aside from that, the built-in player performs very well and will be more than sufficient for most people for everyday use with a USB flash drive or external USB drive.

Sound

8.4/10

7.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    86dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

On paper the audio specification of the S90 series has stood still for years. It still uses a 2.1 configuration with a total power of 40 W, so before testing we assumed any noticeably better sound would mainly apply to the largest variants. However, the 65-inch model we tested also sounded noticeably better than its predecessors. The sound is fuller, more dynamic and has more "weight" than the dry technical specs would suggest. We don't know whether Samsung changed anything in the speakers themselves or whether the improvement is mainly due to better tuning and software optimization, but you can hear the effect from the first moments. For such a slim TV the S90H performs really well and for many people may be sufficient even without a soundbar. The only real complaint is the lack of DTS:X support, which unfortunately is increasingly absent from TVs. It does have Dolby Atmos, so users of streaming services are unlikely to feel any major drawback. Those most likely to be left wanting are people using Blu-ray discs, where DTS tracks still appear fairly often.

* In the test we used the S90H variant. The S92H is also available for purchase; it is equipped with two additional 20 W drivers. This results in a 2.1.2 setup with a total power of 60 W, so you can expect stronger and more spacious sound. We can't confirm that, however, as we didn't have the chance to test that version.

In terms of sound, the S85H hasn’t really changed compared with its predecessor. It still uses a fairly basic 2.0 system with a total output of 20 W, which sounds adequate and, for such a slim TV, can even add a bit of bass. That’s perfectly fine for everyday TV watching, but it’s not at the level of pricier models that can sound fuller and more "spatial." With that picture, adding at least a soundbar is a no-brainer. All the more so since the S85H supports Dolby Atmos and Samsung’s Q-Symphony, which lets a compatible Samsung soundbar work together with the TV speakers instead of replacing them entirely. If you want to get more from this setup when watching movies, external audio is the most sensible addition.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

86dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy