Samsung QN990F vs Samsung S85F (WOLED)

The Samsung QN990F belongs to the bright televisions and this is immediately evident in the tests. In measurements, it achieved around 1300 nits, which in practice allows you to enjoy movies as their creators intended. Bright scenes have the right impact, lights shine, and the feeling is truly cinematic. In standard test patterns, sequences number 1, 3, and 5 performed the best – there the brightness remained around 800-1000 nits, and the image looked very natural. In more challenging segments, it could drop to about 600 nits, but still the level remained sufficient for details to be well visible. However, it should be added that with such highly contrasted shots, the halo effect returns – the same one we mentioned regarding the blacks. Bright elements can leave a glow on dark backgrounds, and this is immediately noticeable. Since we are dealing with a QLED, the color palette is expanded and the colors look impressive. The problem is that with such a flagship model, we expected better numbers. 91% coverage of DCI-P3 and about 67% BT.2020 are results that can be considered solid, but not outstanding. This results in a vibrant and attractive picture; however, competition in this and lower price segments can show even more.

For most of the time, let's say in 90% of film scenes, viewers won't see practically any difference between the S85F versions. When small but very strong light points appear on the screen – a lantern in a dark alley, a gunshot, the sun breaking through the clouds – this WOLED panel (like the smaller S85F) performs wonderfully. Our measurements showed peak brightness at around 750 nits. We can confidently state: this is an excellent result that guarantees fantastic HDR effects. The problem arises in a very specific, uncomfortable situation for any OLED. We're talking about the moment when the entire screen has to shine at full power brightly. Examples include a slide with a white background, a ski jump scene, or our test sequences (5) from the movie The Meg. And here, unfortunately, the results diverge quite significantly to the detriment of the WOLED panel variant. Our measurement equipment was able to measure a maximum of about 250 to 300 nits of brightness in such conditions. Just to be clear: the same model on a QD-OLED panel in the same test is almost twice as bright. The second issue: colors. And here we also have to be honest – QD-OLED has a design advantage. Why? It’s simple. QD-OLED creates colors from three components (red, green, and blue) and does not need an additional white subpixel. The WOLED panel we are testing uses this white subpixel mainly to boost overall brightness. The effect is that QD-OLED is able to show a slightly wider color palette, and the colors are a bit "cleaner." But let’s be clear: it’s not that the colors on this WOLED panel are bad! On the contrary, they are actually very good. Coverage of the DCI-P3 film palette at 97% and 71% for the wider BT.2020 palette is still a high standard. We just have to honestly admit that this few percent advantage in color coverage is on the side of QD-OLED technology and may be noticeable in very specific moments.

We tested the QN990F in Filmmaker mode, which is the best available right out of the box. Right from the start, we noticed several significant errors. The biggest issue was with white balance. Due to too little blue and also incorrect proportions between red and blue, the image – especially in scenes with a lot of white – appeared too yellow and at times even orange. On the Color Checker palette, these errors didn't look dramatic as they hovered around a value of 4, but in everyday viewing, especially with strong whites, they were most noticeable. We also noticed issues with brightness management – the television had difficulty maintaining details in the smallest parts of the image, mainly due to the way it controls the backlight zones. Fortunately, Samsung offers a lot of room for adjustment when it comes to setting corrections. We know that with proper calibration, you can definitely get a lot more out of this screen.

When it comes to factory color reproduction, our test sample in SDR mode suffered from a slight deficiency in red and yellow color. This resulted in a subtle yellowish tint visible in the shades of white. However, this is not the biggest problem with the S85F. Similar to the QD-OLED panel variant, the biggest issue with this model is the way it presents HDR content. When we look at the EOTF curve graph, it is easy to see that the television has quite significant problems with overly brightening the image. This causes the final picture in many scenes to become very unnatural.

After performing calibration, we managed to bring the white balance into order and eliminate the previous deficiencies in blue tones. As a result, the image no longer appeared as if it had a slightly yellowish filter – whites are cleaner, and the overall presentation looks much more natural. We also managed to some extent to tame the brightness characteristic in HDR content. The television now handles maintaining details in blacks significantly better and does not lose them as much as before. However, when we look at the EOTF curve and how the QN990F reproduces brightness in films, it is evident that it still tends to emphasize details in dark scenes more strongly. This is a characteristic feature of Mini-LED technology, and more specifically, how it is managed by the QN990F, which is practically impossible to completely eliminate. Nevertheless, after calibration, the image looks much more natural, primarily due to the correct exposure of white light. The final effect is definitely more pleasant to receive and closer to what we expect from a flagship television.

After calibrating in Filmmaker mode, we managed to eliminate most of the unwanted effects. In SDR content, the television performs exemplary, and its color reproduction errors do not exceed a value of 2, which is an excellent result. A bit worse, although still very good, are the HDR quality contents. While we were able to eliminate a significant unnaturalness in the image caused by too high a positioning of the EOTF curve, the most discerning observers may notice that it is not perfectly aligned. It runs slightly below the reference curve, which would suggest that the S85F has slight issues showing all the details in the image. We must point out right away that it is highly unlikely that an average viewer would notice any shortcomings in the image. The final effect after calibration is rated as exemplary.

The QN990F deserves the highest praise for its upscaling. The processor responsible for "pulling up" classic TV to 8K resolution performs quite well. While watching content in a 576p signal, we had no illusions that we would suddenly see a marketing-style miracle where the image magically transforms into crystal-clear 8K. Nevertheless, the final effect was surprisingly good; the image looked clean and clear. It's just unfortunate that the TV, like most Samsung models, has an overscan issue, which slightly cuts off the edges of the screen on the left side.

Regarding image processing, Samsung provides a feature called "noise reduction," which in theory should improve tonal transitions in older materials, where they are usually more noticeable. Unfortunately, we felt quite disappointed here. The feature works poorly – it struggles with unwanted bands and can even introduce its own artifacts. On the plus side, the TV does not eliminate film grain when using this feature, but in practice, that's little consolation since the noise reduction itself proves to be practically useless.

The processing of tonal transitions (gradients) in the S85F is at a high level. The television effectively handles posterization (the "stepping" effect of colors), even with heavily compressed materials, such as from streaming services. However, using this feature requires making a certain compromise. We noticed that the noise reduction algorithm is quite aggressive – even at the lowest setting, it can eliminate natural film grain, which for many viewers is part of the film's aesthetics. The "Standard" setting seems to be the golden mean, not causing visible loss of important details, so we can recommend it. However, we advise against using the "High" level, which removes not only noise but also desired details, such as texture or structure of objects on the screen.

The scaling (upscaling) process of lower resolution content works very well in the S85F. The image is sharp and clear. The only minor imperfection we observed is occasional, slight aliasing on the edges. The television also still exhibits characteristics typical of this manufacturer, such as active "overscan" (slight magnification of the image). This should be kept in mind, especially when watching older materials, as it may result in a minimal cropping of the original frame.

The QN990F can easily be called one of the fastest televisions in the world. In 4K mode, it can display images at a frequency of up to 240 Hz, which until now has been more associated with gaming monitors than with televisions in the living room. However, in everyday viewing, what matters more is how it handles 8K signals at 120 Hz – and it performs very well here too. Motion remains smooth, and the television manages without a hitch even with the most demanding content. Additionally, there is a motion smoother, called "Picture Clarity." With it, you can adjust the image to your own preferences – leave a slight cinematic stutter or switch to maximum smoothness, which works great, for instance, in sports broadcasts.

The S85F is a model with impressive speed. The use of a 120 Hz OLED panel ensures that dynamic scenes, both in games and during sports broadcasts, meet expectations: smoothly, sharply, and without loss of clarity. A key role here is played by the instantaneous pixel response time, which is a natural advantage of OLED technology. Transitions between frames are instantaneous, and the image remains clear even during the fastest camera movements. Moving objects, like a ball on the field or a car in a chase scene, are clear and devoid of the characteristic motion blur typical of LCD panels (the so-called "tail").

It must be said directly – the QN990F is one of those TVs that screams it was designed with gamers in mind. Samsung has been developing its gaming solutions for years, but here we have a true package. Sure, the lack of Dolby Vision support in games is a downside that will always come up in discussions. However, apart from that, the list of features is truly impressive. To start, we have Game Bar – a handy menu that allows you to quickly check and change game-related settings. You can see, for example, VRR is turned on, the frame rate, or the aspect ratio settings. It's like a small "dashboard," allowing you not to dig deep into the menu to make adjustments. Speaking of VRR: yes, variable refresh rate is present here and works flawlessly. Additionally, there's ALLM, which automatically switches the TV to game mode as soon as the console is turned on. These may seem like small details, but together they make using the QN990F simply convenient and hassle-free.

However, the number of ports makes the biggest impression. Four wireless HDMI 2.1 ports are already great news because you don't have to choose whether to connect the console, the receiver, or maybe even the PC. There's plenty of room here for everything. And if we add an additional micro HDMI (which we recommend connecting directly to consoles), hidden in the housing, we practically have five inputs in full 2.1 standard. Add to that support for high refresh rates – 120 Hz in 8K or even 240 Hz in 4K – and we get a TV that not only keeps up with the new consoles but also feels ready for consoles that are yet to come.