Samsung QN990F vs Dreame S100

Direct comparison

Check the best price offer:

Samsung QN990F
$7 697

Available screen sizes: 65”75”85”98”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA (wide viewing angle)

Resolution: 7680x4320

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.6

6.8

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.7

    5.9

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    7.7

    6.2

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    7.6

    6.8

  • Gaming on console

    9.2

    7.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    7.9

    7.6

  • Watching in bright light

    5.2

    6.0

  • Utility functions

    7.5

    5.9

  • Apps

    9.3

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    7.9

    8.3

Advantages

  • Amazing Design

  • Wireless module Wiraless One Connect

  • Very good black

  • High brightness

  • Matte panel very well suppresses reflections

  • Good viewing angles

  • The fastest television in the world - 4K@240Hz and 8K@120Hz refresh rates great for sports

  • Many features for gamers: HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, HGiG, Gamebar

  • Very fast and intuitive Tizen OS operating system

  • Great viewing angles (thanks to the ADS matrix)

  • Decent blacks thanks to Mini-LED backlighting

  • Good colors thanks to the PFS filter (advertised as QLED)

  • High motion fluidity (144 Hz panel)

  • Low input lag (in game mode)

  • A lot of gaming features, including two HDMI 2.1 ports (VRR, ALLM, and Game Bar)

  • Google TV system with a rich library of apps

  • Good sound thanks to the built-in "soundbar"

Disadvantages

No like
  • Very high price

  • Local dimming algorithms could be better refined

  • Missing Dolby Vision and DTS:X

  • High input lag delays with wireless connection to Wireless One Connect

  • Underdeveloped local dimming algorithms (may cause annoying brightness drops)

  • Outdated image processor and poor digital processing of the Google TV system

  • Software bugs, occasional stuttering

  • Useless Filmmaker mode (completely blocks any change to picture settings)

  • Poor implementation of HDR format in games (lack of HGiG support and high input lag in Dolby Vision mode)

Our verdict

The Samsung QN990F is a television that makes an enormous impression from the very first moment. It is probably one of the most beautiful models on the market – ultra-thin, with an almost invisible frame and a base that gives the impression that the screen is hovering above the table. Additionally, there is the futuristic Wiraless One Connect module, this time in a wireless version, which helps to reduce the number of cables in the living room and gives the whole setup a modern character. But it doesn’t end with design. The QN990F also boasts powerful specifications. The Mini-LED with over a thousand dimming zones can generate contrast that at times approaches OLED levels. Moreover, it features very high HDR brightness and a new matte panel that effectively eliminates reflections. And when we add great motion fluidity with a refresh rate reaching up to 240 Hz in 4K, we have a set of features that truly impress. Samsung hasn’t forgotten about gamers either – we have Game Bar, VRR, ALLM, five HDMI 2.1 ports, and phenomenal input lag at the level of 10–15 ms (when connected via micro HDMI).

And this is where we get to the heart of the matter. While the QN990F impresses on paper and in many tests, in practice some solutions still require refinement. The wireless One Connect module raises the input lag to unacceptable levels for gamers, the Mini-LED can struggle in difficult scenes with a lot of details, and the lack of Dolby Vision or DTS:X serves as a reminder that Samsung is stubbornly pursuing its own path, sometimes at the user's expense. Despite this, the QN990F is a television that demonstrates the direction of industry development. It is not a model for everyone – but for those who love gadgets, technological innovations, and want a screen in their living room that looks like it’s from the future. However, if someone is solely looking for the best picture quality, even within Samsung's portfolio, they will find models that perform significantly better – perhaps without 8K, but with more refined contrast or colors. Because 8K still remains a technology that looks firmly towards the future and the QN990F shows what televisions of tomorrow can look like. But are we – the viewers – already ready to pay such a high price for this vision and accept the compromises that come with it?

Dreame S100 is a successful, albeit still somewhat raw, debut in the Mini-LED segment. The hardware of the TV stands up for itself: the Mini-LED technology with local dimming provides deep and attractive blacks for the average viewer, while the IPS/ADS matrix offers brilliant viewing angles. This is an interesting combination, as it is extremely rare in the LCD TV segment, which will certainly please those with wide living rooms or large corner sofas. If we add to this a full package for gamers (HDMI 2.1, 144 Hz), the Google TV system with an almost endless number of applications, and a very powerful 4.1.2 sound system with a power of 70 W, which performs well above the market average, we get an incredibly versatile screen.

Where's the catch? In the software. Unfortunately, the Dreame S100 suffers from typical "growing pains" – the outdated processor doesn't quite handle advanced digital processing, and the local dimming algorithms can be irritating in more demanding scenes. Additionally, the Google TV system itself can occasionally experience slight stutters. So, if you're looking for a well-equipped Mini-LED for a wide living room and are willing to forgive it for minor system hiccups, which the manufacturer can fix with future updates – it's a very interesting option. The hardware potential is enormous, although the software still needs some final polishing.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 5 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (40Gbps)
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Super Premium
Good
Stand type
Central
Central
Bezel color
Silver
Black
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand, One Connect Box
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.6/10

5.9/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 1344 (28 x 48)

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 160 (10 x 16)

Contrast:

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

89,250:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

28,200:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

12,100:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,050:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

32,850:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

11,800:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,900:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,650:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

1,700:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

QN990F is the highest representative of the Neo QLED series, so it couldn't lack Mini-LED technology. The 65-inch specimen we tested features a VA panel and as many as 1344 local dimming zones, which already looks really impressive on paper. In practice, it can provide a contrast effect close to ideal. In less demanding scenes, such as in the film Oblivion, the QN990F did not fall behind OLED TVs – the blacks were virtually infinite, and the picture looked fantastic. However, it wasn't always so rosy. Or maybe black and white? Like every Mini-LED, the QN990F has its limitations, and in more challenging sequences, it can leave mixed impressions. Where there is a huge amount of fine details on the screen, the algorithms controlling the zones simply got lost. The contrast dropped, and a clear halo effect appeared around bright elements. Additionally, in films recorded in the 21:9 (2.35:1) format, we noticed that the QN990F is unable to perfectly dim the pitch-black letterbox, leaving a silver/navy blue glow on them. One could say that Samsung in this model focused more on the visibility of details than on the perfect depth of black. On the one hand, this gives very good results in several scenes; on the other hand, in a TV of this class, we expected that the local dimming would be refined even further. The final effect is simply "okay," and at this price level, we would expect something more than just a satisfactory result.

Dreame S100 is a Mini-LED television that in the 65" version uses an IPS/ADS panel. Such a panel does not naturally offer the best contrast on the market, but thanks to a fairly dense Mini-LED backlight, the black levels in this model are quite decent. In less demanding scenes, the contrast could reach values of 30,000:1. This is several times higher and virtually impossible to achieve for any type of LCD panel without local dimming technology. This makes the black levels and contrast in the S100 quite appealing for a less demanding viewer.

Unfortunately, in more demanding shots where a substantial number of small elements appear on a black background, the local dimming algorithms in the Dreame S100 do not work perfectly. The television can become either excessively dark, resulting in super deep blacks, but almost nothing is visible on the screen, or go in the other direction – a large number of details are visible, but the contrast results are very poor. The black levels in very demanding scenes around bright objects take on a grayish hue (halo effect). This is a typical limitation of Mini-LED televisions from the lower and mid-range, and unfortunately, the Dreame S100 is not an exception that handles this problem particularly well. However, it should be noted that generally, the contrast and black levels are definitely better here than in LCD televisions without any local dimming technology.

HDR effect quality

6.6/10

3.4/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 91.1%, Bt.2020: 67.0%
DCI P3: 94.6%, Bt.2020: 71.6%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

802 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

689 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

1076 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

577 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

735 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

503 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

71 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

241 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

42 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

589 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Dreame S100

Samsung QN990F

The Samsung QN990F belongs to the bright televisions and this is immediately evident in the tests. In measurements, it achieved around 1300 nits, which in practice allows you to enjoy movies as their creators intended. Bright scenes have the right impact, lights shine, and the feeling is truly cinematic. In standard test patterns, sequences number 1, 3, and 5 performed the best – there the brightness remained around 800-1000 nits, and the image looked very natural. In more challenging segments, it could drop to about 600 nits, but still the level remained sufficient for details to be well visible. However, it should be added that with such highly contrasted shots, the halo effect returns – the same one we mentioned regarding the blacks. Bright elements can leave a glow on dark backgrounds, and this is immediately noticeable. Since we are dealing with a QLED, the color palette is expanded and the colors look impressive. The problem is that with such a flagship model, we expected better numbers. 91% coverage of DCI-P3 and about 67% BT.2020 are results that can be considered solid, but not outstanding. This results in a vibrant and attractive picture; however, competition in this and lower price segments can show even more.

The Dreame S100 is a relatively bright television. In movie mode, the brightness we measured reached about 600 nits. This is a really good result, although not the highest, considering the capabilities of the competition in this price range. In fullscreen scenes, it is evident that the television can generate an image that strikes with brightness. Unfortunately, when more complex scenes appeared on the screen, the local dimming algorithm in this model tried above all to maintain the deepest blacks. However, this came at the expense of HDR effect – and in a drastic way. In such scenes, the brightness of bright elements dropped below 100 nits, which is a truly tragic result, far from any HDR effect. This aspect can be improved, though not without any "buts." It is enough to change the local dimming setting in the television's menu, but then the blacks in such scenes simply turn gray. It’s a pity that Dreame could not refine the local dimming algorithms better, and the S100 is another example that the mere number of local dimming zones does not always translate into better image quality. As a consolation, it is worth adding that the Dreame S100 is advertised as a "QLED" television, although in reality it utilizes a PFS LED filter. As a result, the colors are appropriately saturated, and the color gamut coverage we measured exceeded 94% of the DCI-P3 palette.

Factory color reproduction

7/10

5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the QN990F in Filmmaker mode, which is the best available right out of the box. Right from the start, we noticed several significant errors. The biggest issue was with white balance. Due to too little blue and also incorrect proportions between red and blue, the image – especially in scenes with a lot of white – appeared too yellow and at times even orange. On the Color Checker palette, these errors didn't look dramatic as they hovered around a value of 4, but in everyday viewing, especially with strong whites, they were most noticeable. We also noticed issues with brightness management – the television had difficulty maintaining details in the smallest parts of the image, mainly due to the way it controls the backlight zones. Fortunately, Samsung offers a lot of room for adjustment when it comes to setting corrections. We know that with proper calibration, you can definitely get a lot more out of this screen.

We tested the Dreame S100 in "movie" mode and definitely recommend using this setting for watching all kinds of content. Interestingly, in the deeper settings of the TV, we also find a dedicated "Filmmaker" mode, which is available today from almost every manufacturer. However, in the case of the Dreame S100, we do not recommend using it – it blocks all image-related settings and does not allow any configuration in the menu - not even motion smoothing. So how do the factory colors perform on the S100? Not too bad, but also not great. The TV itself was quite heavily tinted with blue components, which is clearly visible in our white balance measurements. This caused the image to be artificially brightened, and the colors had a slight bluish tint. This is confirmed by the Color Checker palette, which showed how color samples leaned towards blue, generating quite significant color errors. The image in HDR mode looked definitely better, where color errors were not as prominently visible, though they still fell far from ideal. Here, the white balance was also too heavily skewed towards the blue color, which caused quite significant errors in color reproduction.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.5/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After performing calibration, we managed to bring the white balance into order and eliminate the previous deficiencies in blue tones. As a result, the image no longer appeared as if it had a slightly yellowish filter – whites are cleaner, and the overall presentation looks much more natural. We also managed to some extent to tame the brightness characteristic in HDR content. The television now handles maintaining details in blacks significantly better and does not lose them as much as before. However, when we look at the EOTF curve and how the QN990F reproduces brightness in films, it is evident that it still tends to emphasize details in dark scenes more strongly. This is a characteristic feature of Mini-LED technology, and more specifically, how it is managed by the QN990F, which is practically impossible to completely eliminate. Nevertheless, after calibration, the image looks much more natural, primarily due to the correct exposure of white light. The final effect is definitely more pleasant to receive and closer to what we expect from a flagship television.

The Dreame S100 turned out to be a device very susceptible to professional calibration. In its menu, we found a whole array of advanced options that allowed us to effectively correct factory errors. Thanks to advanced white balance correction – both in SDR and HDR content – we completely eliminated excess blue components. The image immediately became much more natural and pleasant to view. After fully tuning the colors, errors in the Color Checker test dropped below Delta E values of 2-3. For the average viewer, this means that any color distortions have become nearly impossible to notice with the naked eye. This is a really nice surprise, as often new brands in the television market have significant problems with proper implementation and functioning of sliders in the calibration menu. Here, everything worked as it should. The only thing we need to criticize is the way the television manages its brightness in HDR. Due to the specific nature of the local dimming algorithms, we observed anomalies in the EOTF curve we measured. In the areas where high highlights should appear, there is a slight uplift of the curve above the reference line. In practice, this results in unnatural brightening of some of the brightest elements in movies or games. Despite this minor flaw, professional calibration brings a huge, very positive change to this model.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.2/10

8/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

In terms of fluidity in tonal transitions, the QN990F shows class. It's one of the best results we've seen so far. In most scenes, there are no visible color banding or typical stepping – the transitions are smooth and natural, and the image feels incredibly cohesive. Of course, as with practically every television, in very dark shots, some gradation issues can be noticed. Stepping can be noticeable there, but this is a typical phenomenon and should not affect the assessment of the QN990F itself. Against the competition, it looks really very good, and the impression from viewing is simply excellent, ensuring that nothing will distract our sight.

The transition between individual shades on the Dreame S100 is quite good. Analyzing most content in HDR10 format, we did not notice significant issues with banding. Only some very extreme and dark scenes revealed a problem with contouring of shades. However, the situation is a bit worse with content in Dolby Vision* format. Here, the color gradation clearly worsens, and the tonal transitions from one color to another are more visible and distinct from each other. Therefore, the rating of this element on our site is slightly lower when considering viewing (on streaming platforms) in this format.

*we will add photos after modifying the site 😉

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.9/10

4/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The QN990F deserves the highest praise for its upscaling. The processor responsible for "pulling up" classic TV to 8K resolution performs quite well. While watching content in a 576p signal, we had no illusions that we would suddenly see a marketing-style miracle where the image magically transforms into crystal-clear 8K. Nevertheless, the final effect was surprisingly good; the image looked clean and clear. It's just unfortunate that the TV, like most Samsung models, has an overscan issue, which slightly cuts off the edges of the screen on the left side.

Regarding image processing, Samsung provides a feature called "noise reduction," which in theory should improve tonal transitions in older materials, where they are usually more noticeable. Unfortunately, we felt quite disappointed here. The feature works poorly – it struggles with unwanted bands and can even introduce its own artifacts. On the plus side, the TV does not eliminate film grain when using this feature, but in practice, that's little consolation since the noise reduction itself proves to be practically useless.

The scaling and digital processing in the Dreame S100 is handled by a technology that the manufacturer proudly calls Dreamind™ Pro AI. However, it is essential to clarify that this is not a proprietary processor but merely a marketing name for a chip from MediaTek – specifically, the model MT5889. Unfortunately, we are talking about quite an outdated unit, from the time when MediaTek lagged significantly behind the competition in terms of performance. This, unfortunately, has a direct impact on the image, as this chip is responsible for that as well. The upscaling in the S100 is rather mediocre, and the processor tends to strongly and artificially sharpen edges (fortunately, this can be somewhat tempered with the sharpness slider in the menu). In the options, we also find a "Contour Smoothing" function, which theoretically is supposed to improve tonal transitions. In practice, it brings almost no improvement – setting it to any level rarely eliminates visible color banding but can unnecessarily blur elements of the image that should remain sharp.

A separate problem is the phenomenon of overscan (clipping the edges of the frame), which is almost always visible here. Although there is an option to set the screen to display the full frame in low-resolution materials, it requires activating the aforementioned Filmmaker mode. And as you already know, this mode completely blocks any other adjustments in the image menu. In our test tables, we noted that the television offers the option to disable overscan, as technically such a feature exists in the system – however, in everyday use, with reasonable image settings, you will not be able to take advantage of it.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.9/10

7.7/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
240Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
No
Brightness drop with BFI
76%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur (4K@240Hz):

Blur (4K@144Hz):

The QN990F can easily be called one of the fastest televisions in the world. In 4K mode, it can display images at a frequency of up to 240 Hz, which until now has been more associated with gaming monitors than with televisions in the living room. However, in everyday viewing, what matters more is how it handles 8K signals at 120 Hz – and it performs very well here too. Motion remains smooth, and the television manages without a hitch even with the most demanding content. Additionally, there is a motion smoother, called "Picture Clarity." With it, you can adjust the image to your own preferences – leave a slight cinematic stutter or switch to maximum smoothness, which works great, for instance, in sports broadcasts.

When it comes to motion fluidity, the Dreame S100 performs really well. It features a panel with a 144 Hz refresh rate, although in reality, the vast majority of users using it in a traditional way will still be limited to 120 Hz (because today's equipment, apart from PCs, only allows for such values). Thanks to the high refresh rate, the image in motion remains really sharp, largely due to the well-functioning MEMC fluidity enhancer. In the menu, we find predefined modes that allow the TV to efficiently add artificial frames, which effectively improves the fluidity of dynamic sports shots, but also helps get rid of image stuttering in film and series materials recorded at 24 frames.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.6/10

7.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 240Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Warning Yes, high input lag
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

It must be said directly – the QN990F is one of those TVs that screams it was designed with gamers in mind. Samsung has been developing its gaming solutions for years, but here we have a true package. Sure, the lack of Dolby Vision support in games is a downside that will always come up in discussions. However, apart from that, the list of features is truly impressive. To start, we have Game Bar – a handy menu that allows you to quickly check and change game-related settings. You can see, for example, VRR is turned on, the frame rate, or the aspect ratio settings. It's like a small "dashboard," allowing you not to dig deep into the menu to make adjustments. Speaking of VRR: yes, variable refresh rate is present here and works flawlessly. Additionally, there's ALLM, which automatically switches the TV to game mode as soon as the console is turned on. These may seem like small details, but together they make using the QN990F simply convenient and hassle-free.

However, the number of ports makes the biggest impression. Four wireless HDMI 2.1 ports are already great news because you don't have to choose whether to connect the console, the receiver, or maybe even the PC. There's plenty of room here for everything. And if we add an additional micro HDMI (which we recommend connecting directly to consoles), hidden in the housing, we practically have five inputs in full 2.1 standard. Add to that support for high refresh rates – 120 Hz in 8K or even 240 Hz in 4K – and we get a TV that not only keeps up with the new consoles but also feels ready for consoles that are yet to come.

The Dreame S100 seems almost like the perfect screen for gamers. The TV is equipped with 2 HDMI 2.1 ports with a bandwidth of 40 Gbps, which means that features such as Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM) and Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) synchronization in the range of 48-144 Hz work seamlessly on consoles. It also has a well-designed game panel (Game Bar) that allows you to continuously check the most important parameters – from active picture modes to the number of frames rendered by the console, and even the ability to add a crosshair in the center of the screen. All of this looks great on paper, but the biggest issue with the S100 is the implementation of HDR mode in games. The TV does not have a properly implemented HGiG format. As a result, an unsuspecting user may incorrectly configure the console during the initial setup of the display. A wrong configuration can lead to a picture that is too dark or too bright (as a guideline: we suggest setting the brightness in the Xbox console menu to about 600 nits, and in the PS5 to 12 clicks). The Dolby Vision format is also problematic; it often just would not activate at all when using the XBOX – Dreame S100 line. And when it was managed to be activated, gaming was impossible due to a very high input lag that often exceeded 100ms. If the manufacturer can improve the HDR issue in games through an update, the S100 will be truly excellent equipment for gamers. For now, however, one must reckon with compromises.

Input lag

9.9/10

9.2/10

SDR

1080p60
15 ms
15 ms
1080p120
9 ms
6 ms
2160p60
13 ms
15 ms
2160p120
10 ms
6 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
15 ms
2160p120
10 ms
6 ms
4320p60
17 ms

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
127 ms
2160p120 DV
18 ms

If we look at the table with input lag results, the QN990F performs phenomenally – within 10–15 ms, which is practically on par with gaming monitors. But there are a few caveats. First and foremost, the measurements taken on an additional micro HDMI, which Samsung cleverly hid in the television housing, show the full potential. At that point, the image responds instantaneously, and gaming is pure pleasure. The problem starts when we connect the console to the wireless One Connect module. Here, input lag jumps – the measuring device showed values higher by as much as 20 ms for the first 1-2 seconds before the delay stabilized around 40 ms. That’s already a level that is noticeable in faster games. Interestingly, the module was placed nearby, at a distance of 2–3 meters, so the signal didn’t have any challenging conditions. It’s not hard to imagine that if we hide it, for instance, behind a couch at a distance of 6–10 meters, input lag could exceed 100-150 ms. And those values are completely unacceptable for gaming.

Input lag measurements for Wireless One Connect from a distance of 2-3m look as follows:

SDR

Input lag

HDR

Input lag

1080p60

39 ms

1080p120

25 ms

2160p60

39 ms

2160p60

39 ms

2160p120

26 ms

2160p120

26 ms

4320p60

43 ms

4320p60

43 ms

Aside from the aforementioned problem with Dolby Vision, the input lag on the Dreame S100 is really very low. Values around 5-6 ms at a refresh rate of 120 Hz and 12-15 ms for 60 Hz are such excellent results that even a professional gamer won't be able to feel any delay during gameplay. The response to movements on the controller is almost instantaneous here.

Compatibility with PC

7.9/10

7.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Average
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
10ms
6ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGB
Max refresh rate
240Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

QN990F can be impressive when we connect a computer for gaming. The panel with a refresh rate of up to 240 Hz, support for G-Sync, and a really decent input lag make the TV act like a gigantic gaming monitor. For gaming, it's a dream setup, and the responsiveness here is at a level that is practically unheard of in regular TVs.

Unfortunately, the situation looks much worse for regular PC work. That's a pity, because the 8K resolution theoretically has enormous potential – you can place even a 65-inch screen on your desk and sit close to it, taking advantage of the massive pixel density. However, in practice, the magic fades. Despite the correct implementation of chroma 4:4:4, which should guarantee sharp fonts, the readability on the QN990F is not ideal. The letters have slight edge issues, and longer work with text is simply not comfortable. It's a shame because gamers really have significant potential here, and the capabilities in games are great. However, this TV is not really suitable for everyday office work.

The Dreame S100 performs well as a large gaming monitor. It has a 144 Hz panel and easily supports G-Sync and FreeSync. The problem arises when you want to work with text on it. Due to a software bug, the television does not handle full color sampling (Chroma 4:4:4) at 120 Hz and 144 Hz refresh rates, causing the fonts to appear blurry. To make the text perfectly sharp, you need to manually lower the refresh rate to 60 Hz in Windows. This is quite an irritating solution that forces constant switching between settings if you want to use this screen for both work and gaming.

Viewing angles

6.5/10

6.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
57%
68%

Samsung has implemented a viewing angle enhancement coating in the QN990F and it actually does its job. We feel that this year it works a bit weaker than in last year's models, but nonetheless the effect is still impressive. For a VA panel, the viewing angles are really very good – good enough to compare them with what televisions with IPS panels offer. This means that even when watching from the side, we do not noticeably lose either contrast or colors.

The viewing angles on the Dreame S100 are really good, thanks to the ADS panel. Unlike VA panels, this type of screen allows you to view the image at a steep angle without a noticeable loss in color saturation and brightness. This comes at the cost of worse native contrast; however, for most viewers (especially those with a wide couch), it will be quite a good compromise. There is a lack of Mini-LED TVs with good viewing angles at a reasonable price on the market today, so the S100 nicely fills this niche.

Daytime performance

5.2/10

6/10

Panel finish
Matte
Satin
Reflection suppression
Very Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Average
Good

Panel brightness

Dreame S100: 463 cd/m2

Samsung QN990F: 363 cd/m2

One of the biggest innovations in this year's Neo QLED 8K TVs are the matte screens. Yes, you read that right – Samsung has used a matte coating in its flagship model, and we must admit that the effect is truly impressive. Reflections practically disappear, the screen doesn't turn into a mirror, and watching in a bright living room suddenly becomes much more enjoyable. Of course, there’s no rose without thorns. The matte coating makes blacks appear a bit washed out during the day, and colors lose some of their vibrancy. It’s a compromise – either we fight reflections, or we keep the maximum color depth.

When it comes to brightness, the QN990F is not a record-breaker. In TV mode, it achieves around 370-400 nits, which is fine for everyday TV watching, but in very bright, sunlit rooms, it may prove inadequate to completely "break through" the light coming into the room.

The Dreame S100 easily performs well in most living rooms during the day. The television is equipped with a satin finish on the screen – while it may not perfectly reduce reflections, it does an excellent job of preserving color saturation, which does not fade when the room is bright. In terms of pure brightness, the S100 features a moderately bright screen. At peak brightness in SDR format, it can reach about 600 nits. Such a reserve allows it to be placed in a typically sunlit room, although – let's be honest – it is not a brightness demon, and it may struggle with direct, harsh sunlight.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
Mini-LED PFS LED
Software version during testing
T-RSPFDEUC-0090-1050.6 E2500007, BT-S
RTMA.250416.179
Image processor
mt5889 3GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung QN990F TV Panel details
Review Dreame S100 TV Panel details
Review Samsung QN990F TV Panel details
Review Dreame S100 TV Panel details

Samsung QN990F

Dreame S100

TV features

7.5/10

5.9/10

  • System
    Tizen
    Google TV
  • System performance
    Very good
    Decent
  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 5 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 40Gbps
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    Yes
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    No
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung QN990F TV features
Review Samsung QN990F TV features
Review Samsung QN990F TV features
Review Samsung QN990F TV features
Review Dreame S100 TV features
Review Dreame S100 TV features
Review Dreame S100 TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    No
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Classic Features and Connections

Even though the QN990F looks like a television from the future, if someone simply wants to watch regular TV - it can be done quite comfortably. On board, we have several practical additions, such as PiP, which allows for watching two sources simultaneously. There's no need to even mention Bluetooth, as that's already a standard. However, the entire idea of wireless operation is particularly noteworthy. The One Connect module can be placed in a different location than the TV itself, which is a significant convenience for people who frequently switch devices. Of course, it still needs to be plugged into a power source, so it's not a completely cable-free solution, but it's hard not to see this as a showcase of Samsung's strength – a glimpse of what future televisions could look like.

Smart TV System: Tizen

When it comes to the system, Samsung opted for its proprietary Tizen, which, despite being a closed ecosystem – operates extremely smoothly. It's one of the fastest, if not the fastest operating systems in televisions, and it's also very intuitive. All the classic smart features are present: AirPlay, screen mirroring, voice search in multiple languages, or quick access to the most important streaming applications. There may be a few niche programs missing, but the vast majority of users will find everything they need here.

Smart TV: Google TV

Dreame S100 uses the Google TV operating system. This is great news for anyone looking for a TV with access to almost all streaming apps on the market. The system operates quite smoothly, although it occasionally experiences slight stutters – which is a classic issue in most Chinese TVs with Google software. On board, we find almost every necessary Smart TV feature, including screen mirroring and voice search using Google Assistant. Unfortunately, the Dreame S100 lacks support for AirPlay, so iPhone users won't be able to easily share content from their phones.

TV Features

Unfortunately, the Dreame S100 is not a TV designed for traditional television viewers. Apart from basic options for connecting headphones or a fairly simple remote control equipped with a numeric keypad, we won't find virtually any additional features to facilitate everyday viewing of traditional channels. The only nice and, recently, quite rarely found addition is the presence of a physical headphone jack output. This allows for the connection of older wired headphones or analog audio sets.

Apps

9.3/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

8.3/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
No
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The QN990F handles playback of files from USB practically flawlessly. Movies, music, photos – most popular formats work without the slightest problems, and there’s no need to fiddle with additional players or devices. Only with less common picture formats can limitations arise. It's a pity that despite the manufacturer's claims, real support for HEIC files is lacking. The television recognizes them in the media browser, but in practice, it cannot open them.

The built-in media player works well and handled most of the files we provided from our flash drive without any issues. However, there were instances when the application experienced slight stuttering, and selected movies or photos took several seconds to load. If the factory player turned out to be not very intuitive for you or lacked advanced features, the Google TV system comes to the rescue. Just enter the app store and install any external file playback program (e.g., VLC) that will solve this problem.

Sound

7.9/10

8.3/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    84dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

The QN990F can play really nicely. Considering such a slim design, the sound is surprisingly clear and detailed, so one can be satisfied for daily movie watching or gaming. Unfortunately, as is often the case with Samsung's ultra-thin TVs, it lacks bass - and you can feel it right away. Action scenes or stronger effects do not have the depth that a decent soundbar or home theater system would provide. However, it is worth noting the support for Dolby Atmos. This is currently the most popular surround sound codec in films and provides a much greater sense of immersion in the action. Unfortunately, as always with Samsung, support for DTS:X is missing. This format is indeed appearing less frequently in new productions, but it is still valued by fans of physical Blu-ray media.

The sound of the Dreame S100 is one of the greatest advantages of this model – it is really good. The TV is equipped with a 4.1.2 speaker system with a total power of 70 W. The sound is clean, with distinctly perceivable bass, which is confirmed by our acoustic measurements. Large drivers placed on the sides of the cabinet effectively widen the soundstage. As a result, we get a noticeably more spacious sound than with standard 20-watt 2.0 systems. The device supports Dolby Atmos encoding, so we can easily play spatial audio tracks from streaming platforms without the need to purchase an external soundbar. Unfortunately, it lacks support for the DTS format – this is a downside, although we must honestly admit that this standard has recently been abandoned by most manufacturers. On the positive side, the audio connection options are commendable. The Dreame S100 can easily be connected to newer home theaters or soundbars via the HDMI eARC port or optical output. A nice and increasingly rare addition is the classic minijack headphone jack, which gives a second life to older audio sets.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

84dBC (Max)

75dBC