Samsung QN900F vs Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026)

Direct comparison

Check the best price offer:

Samsung QN900F
$3 297

NeoQLED 8K / QN900F

PQS9011 / PQS9001 / the one 2026

Info

Available screen sizes: 65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.8

6.8

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.3

    6.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    7.3

    6.3

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    7.4

    6.8

  • Gaming on console

    9.1

    7.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.4

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    7.1

    6.1

  • Utility functions

    7.2

    7.6

  • Apps

    9.3

    7.2

  • Sound quality

    8.2

    6.9

Advantages

  • Good black

  • Very high brightness - up to 2000 nits in HDR

  • Great motion fluidity - 4k@165hz with low motion blur

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, Game-bar, low input lag

  • Decent viewing angles

  • High usability efficiency in difficult lighting conditions: Matte panel + high brightness

  • Pleasant and very fast operating system: Tizen

  • Pleasant sound from built-in speakers

  • Ambilight, which gives evening viewing sessions a unique atmosphere and improves the perceived native contrast of the VA panel

  • Excellent panel response time: minimal motion blur of moving objects

  • Many gaming features: four HDMI 2.1 ports, VRR, ALLM, HGiG

  • 144 Hz refresh rate at 4K and 240 Hz at Full HD from a PC

  • Good coverage of a wide color gamut (PFS LED)

  • Dolby Vision, which actually helps the TV with HDR content

  • Decent brightness of around 500 nits, useful for daytime viewing

  • Rotating stand

Disadvantages

No like
  • Local dimming algorithms could be better refined

  • No recording support from built-in tuners

  • No DTS:X (home theater)

  • No local dimming: average black levels at night and limited HDR performance

  • Smaller app library than the competition

  • Poor viewing angles (can be helped with a swivel stand)

  • Very high input lag in games with Dolby Vision

  • Significant errors in HDR color reproduction (no CMS adjustment available)

  • Infrared remote that requires aiming

Our verdict

The Samsung QN900F is a television that can make a huge impression. The biggest strength of this model is the combination of Mini-LED backlighting with a matte panel. Thanks to this, we not only have decent blacks but, above all, incredible brightness and excellent readability in any conditions. During the day, in a brightly lit living room, it is probably the best-performing television in Samsung's offering this year. Gamers will also find plenty to enjoy here – even though it's an 8K screen, it can operate at a frequency of up to 165 Hz in 4K. Additionally, it comes with a full suite of HDMI 2.1, VRR and ALLM features, and low input lag, so the QN900F works well with both next-generation consoles and PCs. The design also deserves applause – when hung on the wall with a thick metal frame, this model resembles a more luxurious version of the iconic The Frame. Combined with the matte panel and Art Store mode, it can indeed be treated as a piece of equipment that not only plays and shines but also decorates the living room.

However, not everything is perfect. Despite its impressive specifications, managing local dimming doesn't always perform as well as one might expect. With such a large number of zones, Samsung could refine the control over blacks and HDR effects – it's clear that the potential is immense, but it doesn't always translate into top-tier picture quality. Also, it’s worth remembering that 8K resolution is still more of a novelty than a real necessity, and the price of this model makes it easy to start looking for cheaper alternatives, even within Samsung's own range. Despite these reservations, the QN900F is a television that can certainly impress. Its strength doesn't lie in 8K alone, but in how it presents the image, how it looks, and the enjoyment it provides during use.

The idea behind The One series has remained practically unchanged for years, and with the Philips PQS9001 this is both an advantage and its biggest weakness. Once again, we get a versatile mid-range TV whose main distinguishing feature is Ambilight. The lighting that follows what is happening on the screen can completely change the atmosphere of an evening movie session, and for many people it will be the main reason to choose this TV. That is hardly surprising, because once you get used to the effect, it can be difficult to go back to watching without it. The picture quality itself is good, but we have already seen a very similar level from this series in previous years. The VA panel provides decent blacks, colours are nicely saturated, and the brightness is sufficient for comfortable viewing in a typical living room. It is a shame, however, that Philips did not take another step forward and introduce at least basic local dimming. In a dark room, blacks can look noticeably bluish, and HDR, while clearly visible, does not make as strong an impression as it could. After so many years of The One being on the market, we would have expected a little more progress here.

There has, however, been a noticeable improvement in Titan OS. Compared with last year, and especially with the version from two years ago, the system has become much more pleasant to use. There are more apps, many smaller functions have been improved, and a number of irritating bugs we previously complained about have been fixed. Overall, it works reasonably well, although we are once again frustrated by the remote control, which still requires you to point it directly at the TV. Philips continues to rely on infrared for regular navigation, even though voice control uses a wireless connection. That makes it even harder to understand why the same connection was not used for navigating the menus. The One also has quite a lot to offer gamers. Four HDMI 2.1 ports and a broad set of gaming features are one thing, but what impressed us most was the panel’s response time. Our unit showed practically no visible smearing, even on dark backgrounds, which is quite rare for an LCD TV with a VA panel. Philips deserves a lot of credit for that. The ability to play at 4K 144 Hz or Full HD 240 Hz also makes the TV an interesting option for PC users. Unfortunately, there is still one unfinished element: using Dolby Vision in games on Xbox results in very high input lag.

The PQS9000 therefore leaves us with mixed feelings. It can surprise with excellent motion handling and shows that Philips has clearly worked on its operating system, but we do not see a similar step forward in picture quality. This is a TV we can recommend primarily to fans of Ambilight. If that lighting system is the main reason you are considering a Philips, then buying The One makes a lot of sense. It is still worth checking, however, whether you can find a Mini LED model with good local dimming at a similar price. Such a TV may offer deeper blacks and more impressive HDR performance. In the end, the choice comes down to what matters more to you: the atmosphere created by Ambilight or better picture quality itself.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (40Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Toslink (Optical audio), IR (remote)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Good
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Height adjustment
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.2/10

5.8/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 1056 (24 x 44)

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Samsung QN900F Contrast and black detail

Result

126,000:1

Review Samsung QN900F Contrast and black detail

Result

41,650:1

Review Samsung QN900F Contrast and black detail

Result

49,800:1

Review Samsung QN900F Contrast and black detail

Result

5,350:1

Review Samsung QN900F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,250:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,500:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,950:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,600:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,750:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,500:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The QN900F is equipped with a VA panel, which on its own provides decent contrast, but that’s not its biggest strength. It’s a mini-LED TV, so we’re dealing with local dimming technology that allows selected areas of the image to be dimmed. In the 65-inch variant, we counted as many as 1056 zones, which resulted in truly solid results. In the best possible scenario, the QN900F achieved a contrast exceeding 100,000:1, which is an absolutely impressive result – at that moment, the black really managed to resemble that of an OLED. However, it should be noted that it is not an OLED and has its classic mini-LED traits. Since the TV has to decide which zone to brighten and which to dim – there are moments when the algorithm doesn’t quite know what to do. This was the case, for example, in one of our test scenes, where the QN900F prioritized brightness over black depth, resulting in a significant drop in contrast to a level of 2300:1. Yes, elements on the screen were brighter, but around them, there was a characteristic halo effect – the black then resembled more of a navy blue. Overall, the black in the QN900F is really very good – but not quite enough to compare it to TVs with organic panels.

The black levels and contrast on the Philips PQS9000 are decent for an LCD TV without local dimming. That's mainly down to the VA panel; in our movie scenes contrast often exceeded 5000:1, and in weaker results dropped to around 4000:1. That delivers an image with quite good depth and a clear advantage over typical IPS panels, where black more easily looks gray. Unfortunately, that's about where the panel's strengths end. The TV lacks local dimming, so it can't dim a dark background separately while keeping bright highlights elsewhere on the screen. It only has global dimming, meaning it brightens or dims the entire backlight at once. In a completely dark room you can see these limits: blacks take on a dark navy tint, and shadowy scenes don't have the same depth as on a good locally dimmed screen. Luckily Ambilight helps here. The light on the wall makes the blacks on screen appear deeper and slightly masks the panel's glow. It doesn't change the TV's actual contrast, but it affects how our eyes perceive it. In this case Ambilight is therefore not just decoration, because it can also make evening viewing more pleasant.

HDR effect quality

6.4/10

5.5/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 90.6%, Bt.2020: 66.0%
DCI P3: 94.5%, Bt.2020: 75.5%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung QN900F Brightness measurement

Result

1200 nit

Review Samsung QN900F Brightness measurement

Result

609 nit

Review Samsung QN900F Brightness measurement

Result

850 nit

Review Samsung QN900F Brightness measurement

Result

214 nit

Review Samsung QN900F Brightness measurement

Result

1415 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

449 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

467 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

487 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

486 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

507 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026)

Samsung QN900F

QN900F is really a bright TV – it can generate nearly 2000 nits, which is a value that remains unattainable for most models available on the market. But the mere ability to achieve such brightness is not everything – it also matters whether the TV can use it well. And this is not always perfect. Our tests on movie scenes showed that in scenes such as those from Life of Pi or The Meg, the QN900F can truly shine – literally and figuratively. In such moments, its greatest advantage, which is brightness, makes a huge impression. However, in more challenging scenes, the issues begin – similar to assessing contrast. When smaller, bright elements appear on the screen, the TV often struggles with the decision: whether to highlight them at the expense of black levels, or perhaps maintain deep black but tone down the brightness. The result of this is situations where, for example, in the movie Sicario 2, the brightness dropped to just 200 nits, making details barely visible. The dimming algorithms could definitely be better for a TV of this class.

Philips PQS9000 is a moderately bright TV; in our HDR scenes it reached roughly 450 to just over 500 nits. That's enough to notice a difference versus SDR. Sun reflections, lamps, and highlights have a bit more sparkle than on basic TVs, whose brightness often tops out around 300 nits. However, it’s not at a level where bright elements make a particularly strong impression. The biggest limitation remains contrast. Without local dimming, the TV raises the black level around a bright object when it brightens that object. That means there’s no clear separation between strong highlights and a dark background, and that contrast is what really shows off HDR. The PQS9000 offers more than the cheapest models, but despite decent brightness the effect stays fairly basic.

Colors

Philips deserves praise for the colors. Although the manufacturer labels this model QLED, a PFS phosphor is used here instead of quantum dots. That solution does not prevent good results, however. On test patterns and in measurements of film scenes we recorded about 94% DCI-P3 coverage and 75% BT.2020. For this class of TV that’s really good. In practice, it means the vast majority of colors used in HDR movies and series will have proper saturation. Lush greens and intense reds are not a major problem and add appeal to the picture. Limitations are easier to spot in some games and rarer content that uses the most saturated shades of the wide BT.2020 gamut. In those situations, displays with wider color coverage, such as SQD or RGB LED, can show more. In its price segment the PQS9000 has nothing to be ashamed of.

Factory color reproduction

5/10

5.1/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

Testing the QN900F in Filmmaker mode, one quickly noticed the characteristic features of the image despite the fact that this mode is designed to reflect the director's vision. The white balance was not perfect – the television had noticeable deficiencies in blue color. This made the entire scene take on a warmer tone, as if someone had applied a subtle filter in shades of yellow and orange. In movies where bright shots dominate – for example, scenes in the snow or in strong daylight – this created a slight warming effect, which does not always convey the director's intent. The second noticeable element was brightness management. The QN900F sometimes managed to brighten the image more than necessary. It looked as if the exposure had been slightly "pulled up," causing the scene to lose its naturalness. Shadows were sometimes too shallow, and contrast was slightly weakened. These are not disqualifying errors, but for a television in this price range, it is evident that Filmmaker mode has not been perfected one hundred percent. This is particularly evident when comparing its image to what was visible after screen calibration.

Unfortunately, the PQS9000’s factory picture settings for Film mode need some fine-tuning. In SDR the biggest issue is an excess of red in the white balance, which makes whites, grays, and skin tones too warm, sometimes even slightly pink. On top of that, the gamma runs below the target across most of its range. The TV therefore brightens midtones and highlights, making the overall image look flatter than it should.

In HDR the white balance itself is much better. Aside from minor deviations, the components stay close to each other, so there isn’t the pronounced tint seen in SDR. However, the EOTF curve shows a slight brightening of parts of the image, and the biggest issue appears in measurements of the wide color gamut. Many hues deviate significantly from the reference, with errors reaching 8–9. So the good gamut coverage we praised earlier doesn’t mean the TV hits specific colors accurately. It can display a wide color range, but out of the box it doesn’t use it very precisely.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.7/10

7.7/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, we were able to eliminate the errors in white balance and adjust them to a level that can be considered acceptable. It's not perfect, but definitely better than the factory settings. Most color errors are now within the deltaE 2–3 range, so in practice they shouldn't be noticeable during everyday viewing. The biggest improvement is seen in how the television manages brightness in SDR content. Shadows and details are no longer flattened, giving the image depth and naturalness. When it comes to 4K HDR materials, colors themselves are no longer an issue, but some imperfections of the Mini-LED technology can still be observed. The QN900F tends to dim the smallest bright elements too much, causing them to sometimes disappear from view. However, it should be added that this is a much better solution than boosting the entire screen, which would spoil the contrast. It's more of a characteristic of this technology than a typical flaw, but it's worth keeping in mind. The effects of calibration are really very good.

Calibration brought a big improvement, especially in SDR material. We managed to even out the white balance and remove the previous color cast, and the Color Checker measurements now look really very good. Colors are much closer to what should be on the screen, so with regular TV or SDR movies we can be satisfied with the result. Unfortunately HDR somewhat spoils that outcome. On one hand it's limited by the panel's capabilities, since calibration won't improve contrast or replace local dimming. On the other hand there are color errors we couldn't correct because the CMS settings, that is color management, were grayed out and inactive. For that Philips loses points with us. White balance can be fine-tuned, but without access to wide color gamut controls you can't correct colors in HDR as effectively. It's a shame, because the SDR results show the potential is there, it's just not allowed to be fully used everywhere.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.3/10

8.6/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The QN900F performs really well in terms of gradation. The tonal transitions are smooth and natural, without distinct outlines or banding. Interestingly, it is one of the few TVs that handles dark transitions better than bright ones – we only noticed slight imperfections in heavily brightened scenes like the one from the movie Kingsman. In most cases, the picture simply looks very good and we have nothing to complain about.

Philips PQS9000 handles tonal transitions very well. It’s especially noticeable in dark scenes, where shades blend smoothly into one another without visible banding or distinct borders between colors. As a result, even large uniform areas look smooth. Minor imperfections only appear in brighter tones, but you have to look closely to notice them. During normal viewing they are unlikely to distract from the movie. In this category Philips performs really well.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

If we would like to eliminate non-fluid tonal transitions that can be annoying, for example while watching YouTube, we can use a feature called noise reduction. It works really effectively – it removes the issues with color blending when we set it to Standard level. However, as with most Samsung televisions, this comes with compromises. Although we did not notice that this feature significantly affects the structure of objects in the image, it unfortunately reacts rather aggressively to film grain. Most people will appreciate this effect – the noise is simply removed – but if someone is looking for an image as close as possible to reference settings, then we definitely recommend turning off this option.

As for scaling, which means handling very low-quality content, the QN900F performs really well. On the test screen with the model, the image looked clear, with only slight aliasing that should not bother most viewers. However, it is worth mentioning one issue – the television has problems with so-called overscan, which can cause older content to be slightly cropped. This can manifest itself, for example, with subtitles disappearing from the bottom of the screen.

The digital image processing in the Philips PQS9000 performs well, though we have a few reservations. The "Distortion Reduction" function helps smooth tonal transitions in lower-quality material, but it works quite unevenly. It can improve a section of the picture, only to, moments later and still within the same scene, seem to lose effectiveness and reintroduce banding between shades. A plus is that it doesn't remove film grain or fine noise, so the image retains its texture. We found the "Medium" setting worked best, and that's the one we recommend. The 4K upscaling itself is acceptable, though the picture is very soft. Edges are heavily smoothed, which may make the image feel less crisp to some viewers. In that case, it's worth slightly increasing the sharpness in the TV's menu, as this will make edges stand out more. Don't overdo the sharpness slider, however, or you may introduce artificial halos instead of improving the picture.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.8/10

8.1/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
165Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
74%
0%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@165Hz):

Blur (1080p@240Hz):

There really isn't anything to complain about here – the QN900F looks very good when it comes to motion. Thanks to the 165 Hz panel in 4K, one can confidently say that this TV is suitable for both watching sports and gaming. The motion smoothness feature plays a key role here. It works remarkably well – not only during sports broadcasts, where it can eliminate blurring and image jitter, but also in games, where the animation becomes clearer and smoother. And of course, if someone likes to experiment with movies – they also have that option. At lower settings, there's a slight graininess and filmic character, while at higher settings, it reaches soap opera effect territory. So everyone can adjust the picture to their preferences, and the TV has the power to handle it.

In terms of motion handling, the Philips PQS9000 performs outstandingly for an LCD TV. It's not just the 144 Hz refresh rate, but above all how quickly the panel itself responds. At 120 Hz you can hardly see the typical trailing smears behind moving objects. What's especially pleasing is that this also applies to darker backgrounds, where many VA panels clearly struggle. Here motion remains clear, and Philips pleasantly surprised us in that regard. To adjust how motion is displayed there is the "Motion Style" function. It includes two sliders: "Smoothness" and "Blur Reduction," which let you tailor the effect to the content you're watching and your personal preferences. Our suggested settings are shown in the photo. Treat them as a starting point and try different levels of smoothing to see which you prefer.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.6/10

9.5/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 165Hz
    48 - 240Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Warning Yes, high input lag
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

[UPDATE] We have updated our 2025 Samsung TV reviews following the release of firmware version 1131, which officially restores the essential HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) support.

It is really nice here. The QN900F offers a full set of features that we would expect from a top-tier gaming television – we have VRR, ALLM, Game Bar, and also cloud gaming applications. However, the biggest highlight is the proprietary motion smoothing, which also works in games and – importantly – does not add noticeable delays. This is something we won't find in its other competitors. Unfortunately, there is also something concerning. This year, Samsung has apparently messed something up with its televisions. During the test of the QN900F before its update, it had the HGIG feature, which allowed for perfect adjustment of HDR settings for the console. However, according to our procedures, we always update the equipment to the latest version – to give the manufacturer a chance to fix any shortcomings. And here… it turned out the opposite. After the update, the HGIG feature disappeared from the menu, making the proper configuration of the console for HDR practically impossible. It was supposed to be complete – 165Hz, four HDMI 2.1 ports, a full gaming package… but unfortunately, it turned out to be a little blunder. Such a shame.

Gaming features

When it comes to gaming features, the Philips PQS9000 really has a lot to offer. Four HDMI 2.1 ports let you connect multiple devices without having to decide which one gets the full-capability port. Consoles can use 120 Hz in Full HD, 1440p and 4K, and a PC can also take advantage of 144 Hz at 4K or 240 Hz if you drop down to Full HD. There's also VRR, which matches the refresh rate to the frame rate and prevents screen tearing. Its range goes from 48–240 Hz, with the upper limit applying to Full HD mode.

ALLM is included, so the TV automatically switches into game mode, and HGiG works correctly, which is useful when setting up HDR on a console. There's also a Game Bar for quick access to settings and signal information. The list even includes Dolby Vision gaming, but that option is hard to enjoy because of very high latency. Apart from that caveat, the feature set is really solid.

Input lag

9.8/10

7.2/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
32 ms
1080p120
12 ms
16 ms
2160p60
14 ms
32 ms
2160p120
11 ms
16 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
32 ms
2160p120
10 ms
16 ms
4320p60
18 ms

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
213 ms
2160p120 DV
106 ms

In terms of input lag, the QN900F presents a class of its own. Regardless of the resolution or refresh rate set, the response time remains lightning fast. It's one of those TVs where it's really difficult to feel any delay. Gamers can count on full responsiveness and the certainty that every action from the controller will be immediately reflected on the screen. In this category, it's simply top-notch.

Input lag is already less impressive than the rest of the "gaming" gear. At 60 Hz we measured 32 ms, both in SDR and HDR. That's enough for more relaxed games, but in fast shooters you can feel a slight delay. At 120 Hz the lag drops to 16 ms and gameplay is noticeably more enjoyable, though the competition can respond even faster.

The biggest problem appears when Dolby Vision is enabled. At 60 Hz the delay is as much as 213 ms, and at 120 Hz it reaches 106 ms. The response to controller input is then clearly delayed, which significantly interferes with gameplay. That's why on the PQS9000 it's definitely better to stick with HDR10. Dolby Vision is supported for games, but its practical usefulness remains limited.

Compatibility with PC

8.4/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Average
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
18ms
16ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
165Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

QN900F is an 8K television, so even in a larger size, it can be considered a full-fledged work monitor—as long as someone can actually fit such a colossus on their desk. The device supports chroma 4:4:4, so overall text readability is good, although we noticed some issues with the thinnest lines. This may be due to the fact that at the native resolution of 8K, some texts are simply so microscopic that the television isn't necessarily perfectly adapted for it. It sounds a bit ridiculous, but how else can one explain it? 😉

On the other hand, the QN900F can be a great choice for PC gamers. It supports G-Sync technology and offers a refresh rate of up to 165 Hz at 4K resolution. So, if you have a very powerful computer, the QN900F will allow it to spread its wings and showcase its gaming prowess in full splendor.

PQS9000 owes its high score for computer use mainly to its gaming capabilities. A 144 Hz refresh rate at 4K and support for G-Sync Compatible and AMD FreeSync Premium Pro let you use frame synchronization on compatible NVIDIA and AMD cards. Working with text also fares well. Standard fonts are sharp and legible, and thanks to correct 4:4:4 chroma support, colored letters, icons, and small desktop elements do not lose clarity. The biggest drawback concerns very small, dark text, where the horizontal strokes of letters are noticeably darker than the vertical ones, making some characters look uneven. You probably won't notice this from the couch, but if someone plans to put The One on a desk and work up close, this flaw may become bothersome.

Viewing angles

5/10

3.2/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
67%
68%

The viewing angles on the QN900F are really good, but we have the impression that the "Ultra Viewing Angle" coating that Samsung heavily advertises performs worse than last year. Sure – the effect is still much better than in most LCD TVs with VA panels, but it still falls short of OLEDs or good IPS panels. The picture holds up decently when viewed from the side, colors do not fade as quickly as in standard VAs, but we expected something more, especially since previous Samsung generations were able to perform better. Perhaps the additional matte coating that appeared this year in the 8K series has an impact on this.

Viewing angles are one of the weakest points of the Philips PQS9001. Move to the side and the colors noticeably lose saturation, and the image becomes washed out and lower in contrast. When watching with several people, seats directly in front of the screen are clearly the best. This is unfortunately a typical limitation of VA panels, where strong contrast head-on comes at the expense of poorer off-axis performance. Most TVs with this type of panel have the same problem, and The One is no exception. The swivel stand helps a bit by allowing you to angle the screen toward the viewer, but it won't solve the issue with widely spaced seats.

Daytime performance

7.1/10

6.1/10

Panel finish
Matte
Satin
Reflection suppression
Very Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Average
Good

Panel brightness

Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026): 502 cd/m2

Samsung QN900F: 723 cd/m2

One of the innovations in 8K from Samsung is the matte display. This year, the Koreans have been progressively "matting" their televisions, and it must be admitted that the QN900F is at the very top in this regard – reflections are suppressed better than in any other model on the market. In practice, this means that even in a brightly lit living room, the image remains clear, and reflections virtually disappear from the screen. Of course, such a coating also comes at a price. Colors lose some intensity, and black doesn't look as deep in bright light as it does on glossy screens. But that's more of a detail than a real problem, because after all, the richness of colors and the depth of black matter most in the evening, with the lights off – and then this effect completely disappears.

The Philips PQS9001 performs quite well for daytime viewing. Its biggest advantage is a stable brightness of around 500 nits, regardless of how many bright elements appear on the screen. Even when watching winter sports or a scene full of white, the picture doesn't dim. In a typical living room that level is more than enough to comfortably watch TV without having to cover the windows.

The satin finish does a decent job of suppressing reflections, though it doesn't eliminate them completely. a window opposite the screen will be visible and may be distracting, especially in darker scenes. Black levels hold up well in daylight, so the overall image doesn't become overly washed out. So it's pretty good for everyday viewing, provided the sun isn't shining directly on the screen.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
T-OSCPFDEUC-0090-1110.7, E2500007, BT-S
TPM267E_V167.002.054.151
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung QN900F TV Panel details
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV Panel details
Review Samsung QN900F TV Panel details
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV Panel details

Samsung QN900F

Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026)

TV features

7.2/10

7.6/10

  • System
    Tizen
    Titan OS
  • System performance
    Very good
    Decent
  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 40Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), IR (remote)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    Yes
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung QN900F TV features
Review Samsung QN900F TV features
Review Samsung QN900F TV features
Review Samsung QN900F TV features
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV features
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV features
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV features
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Television Features

The QN900F has quite a lot to offer. In addition to standard connections and tuners, it also includes many typical television features. There is teletext, a clear EPG, and even a PiP function, which is rare these days. The QN900F easily supports other devices using the included solar remote, which somewhat compensates for the lack of recording from the built-in antenna tuners.

Smart TV

When it comes to smart features, Samsung once again provides a lot – there are many applications available (though not all), and Tizen on the QN900F ran very smoothly. It's also hard to find a better TV for connecting external devices – AirPlay, Miracast, Chromecast – everything works flawlessly. An interesting feature is the Art Gallery mode, which – similar to The Frame – allows you to display images on the turned-off screen. Thanks to the fairly thick, massive frame, the effect is really impressive – it looks like a digital painting on the wall and may impress someone. The QN900F can thus be jokingly referred to as The Frame Super Extra Pro 😉

Titan OS in this year's The One shows that Philips has worked on its system. Compared with last year's version, many small issues and functions that previously didn't work as they should have been fixed. Now we can use AirPlay without problems, cast a computer screen via Miracast, or search by voice in Polish. The system itself runs decently, though it's definitely not among the fastest. The app library has also grown: Netflix, Prime Video, Disney+, CANAL+, Apple TV, and YouTube are available. The selection is still smaller than on Google TV, but for popular services Titan gives fewer reasons to complain. Everyday usability has improved in the standard features as well. You can connect Bluetooth headphones and listen to audio through them at the same time as the TV speakers, and there's a mode that lets you turn off the screen and leave only the sound. USB recording and picture-in-picture (PiP) are missing. What's most disappointing is the remote: despite backlit buttons it still controls the TV via infrared, so you have to point it at the screen. The system has gained many useful tweaks, but that control element remains unchanged and can be irritating in daily use.

Apps

9.3/10

7.2/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

8.6/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
No
6 Mpix
Yes
No
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the QN900F works really well. During testing, we didn't notice any major issues with handling various audio and video formats – in fact, you can check it out yourself in our file list. The only conundrum arose with the subtitles – only those saved in the .txt format worked for us, even though according to Samsung's information, the TV should support many more extensions. What could be the reason for this? It's hard to say. It’s possible that this is just a temporary bug that will be fixed in one of the upcoming updates.

The built-in USB player works quickly and smoothly and handles most tested files without problems. It performs well with music, from common MP3s to FLAC files, including 96 kHz/24-bit. It's perfectly adequate for everyday media playback from a USB flash drive. However, once again our biggest reservations are about photo handling. The player treats resolutions rather selectively: it opened our 8 MP, 16 MP and 32 MP files, but failed with, among others, 4 MP, 12 MP and 24 MP. It's hard to find any logic in that, since a larger photo works while a smaller one does not. That can be annoying when browsing vacation photos.

Sound

8.2/10

6.9/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    96dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

The QN900F performs really well – just as a premium television should. The bass is quite strong, but slightly subdued. We wouldn't compare it to top-tier audio systems, but for built-in speakers, it does the job. The high tones also stand out – quite clear and distinct, which is particularly useful when watching movies with a lot of dialogue. Unfortunately, Samsung still does not support the DTS:X format in its televisions. This means that if we want to hear sound recorded in that standard, we need to connect an external home theater system via an amplifier – the television simply won't play it back on its own.

The Philips PQS9001 has a 2.0 audio system with a total power of 40 W, that is, two 10 W speakers per side. It sounds quite good and definitely better than most budget TVs. There's plenty of volume, but the sound lacks depth. The biggest issue is a lack of deep bass, so explosions in movies and heavier parts of music don't have the proper weight. Higher frequencies are not reproduced evenly either. Measurements show a clear dip around 2 kHz, then a boost at 6–7 kHz and a drop-off above about 8 kHz. That can emphasize sibilance and add a bit of harshness to the sound, despite the recessed treble. It's adequate for everyday viewing, but for movies and music it's worth considering external audio. Especially since the TV supports surround sound formats, including Dolby Atmos and DTS. A compatible soundbar or AV receiver will make better use of those formats than the built-in speakers.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

96dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy