Samsung QN85F vs Philips OLED811

Direct comparison

QN85F

OLED801 / OLED811

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 48”55”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.6

8.1

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.3

    8.5

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    7.1

    8.7

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.7

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    9.0

    8.9

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.4

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    6.9

    6.0

  • Utility functions

    7.3

    7.9

  • Apps

    9.3

    7.7

  • Sound quality

    7.6

    7.6

Advantages

  • High HDR brightness (even 1700–1800 nits)

  • Very good contrast and deep blacks

  • 2 times higher number of dimming zones than its predecessor (55")

  • 144 Hz panel with VRR and ALLM support

  • Original Game Motion Plus feature – a unique smoother in gaming

  • Low input lag

  • Satin finish of the panel works great during the day combined with high brightness

  • Extensive Tizen platform: with AirPlay, SmartThings, and convenient solar remote

  • Beautifully designed base. Hybrid – can be a central stand or side legs

  • Solid sound with pleasant bass and Dolby Atmos support

  • Three-sided Ambilight that creates a great atmosphere while watching

  • Perfect blacks and outstanding contrast from the OLED panel

  • Strong HDR effect. Brightness around 1500 nits

  • Very good viewing angles

  • Excellent motion clarity (no motion blur)

  • Supports 4K at 165 Hz

  • Four HDMI 2.1 ports

  • Extensive features for gamers

  • Support for multiple audio/video formats (Dolby Vision, Dolby Atmos, HDR10+, DTS)

Disadvantages

No like
  • No Dolby Vision and DTS:X support

  • No recording function from built-in tuners and PiP

  • Issue with HEIC files in the player

  • Titan OS has a more limited app library compared with Google TV and other competitors

  • An infrared remote that requires pointing at the TV (sometimes responds slowly)

  • Very high input lag in games with Dolby Vision

  • Visible posterization (mainly in bright scenes)

  • Underused image processing capabilities of the Pentonic 800

Our verdict

The Samsung QN85F is a television that perfectly shows why the Neo QLED line was created in the first place. On one hand, it offers everything that a modern user expects – high brightness, excellent fluidity, and full support for gamers. On the other hand, it's still an LCD, which means a technology that requires certain compromises. The only question is whether these compromises actually interfere with everyday use? In practice, it’s hard not to be impressed by how the QN85F handles HDR movies. With a brightness level of 1700–1800 nits, when watching dynamic scenes, we truly feel the "HDR spark" that many competing televisions lack. The lighting effects in movies or series can literally overwhelm with intensity, while at the same time, the television does not lose details and doesn’t turn the whole image into a washed-out spot. This is the kind of spectacularity that viewers investing in a new screen are looking for. Gamers also have reasons to be pleased. There’s support for 144 Hz, Variable Refresh Rate (VRR), and Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM). This is already a must-have in this class, but Samsung goes further and adds the unique Game Motion Plus feature. Thanks to this, the image in games becomes smoother, resembling the action of a motion smoother, but without a noticeable increase in latency. This is a solution that truly distinguishes the QN85F from the competition. On top of all this, there is everyday convenience. The Tizen system is fast, stable, and full of applications that we actually use – from Netflix, through Apple TV, to YouTube or Disney+. Additionally, it supports AirPlay, has an extensive SmartThings platform, and the remote, which instead of intimidating us with dozens of buttons, provides simple controls and quick access to the most important functions. This makes the QN85F a television that you just want to reach for every day. Of course, one could list shortcomings. There’s no Dolby Vision, no USB recording, or Picture-in-Picture, and the viewing angles typical of VA panels won’t impress if you sit at a large angle. But all of this pales in comparison to how universal and refined the QN85F is. During the day, it performs excellently in bright rooms, in the evening, it delivers cinematic emotions in HDR, and in games, it provides fluidity and low input lag that other models could envy. Overall, the QN85F is a television that not only successfully continues the cost-effectiveness tradition of its predecessor, the QN85D, but also develops it with several strong points. It's hardware that is hard to define as anything other than a "safe choice" – one that won’t disappoint in any scenario and is likely to meet the expectations of even the most demanding users.

The Philips OLED811 is a mid-range OLED TV for 2026 that stands out from its biggest rivals primarily because of one feature: Ambilight. By projecting light that follows the on-screen action onto the wall behind the TV, Ambilight can transform the atmosphere of an entire viewing session. In the evening, the picture seems to extend beyond the edges of the screen, making everything you watch feel that little bit more special. For some, it will simply be a nice extra; for others, it will be reason enough to choose a Philips TV once again.

Picture quality is very similar to what you get from models such as the LG C6 or Samsung S90H, at least in versions using the same type of panel. You can therefore expect deep, perfect blacks that make bright highlights look particularly impressive. The OLED811 is capable of delivering impactful HDR, and importantly, once calibrated, its picture comes close to reference quality. It does not have a major advantage over its competitors in this respect, but choosing Philips for Ambilight does not mean sacrificing picture quality either.

Gamers will also find several worthwhile improvements over last year’s model. Thanks to the MediaTek Pentonic 800 chipset, the TV finally offers four HDMI 2.1 ports. This means that connecting several devices—such as consoles, a PC and a soundbar—no longer forces you to decide which one gets access to the full capabilities of the interface. Gaming itself is highly enjoyable: the TV responds quickly, supports variable refresh rates and allows PC users to play in 4K at up to 165 Hz. It is only a shame that the new processor’s capabilities have not been put to equally good use when handling lower-quality content.

The operating system, however, raises the most concerns. Titan OS has replaced the well-liked Google TV platform, and although it has clearly improved over the past year, it is still difficult to see the change as a positive one. Admittedly, the system now runs more smoothly, offers more useful features and includes most popular streaming services in its app library. Nevertheless, the selection of apps remains far more limited than on Google TV and competing platforms. In our view, this is still the OLED811’s biggest weakness. The difference will be particularly noticeable to viewers who use less mainstream services.

Is it worth buying? Yes—provided that Titan OS meets your needs. In terms of picture quality and gaming features, the OLED811 offers just as much as its competitors, while Ambilight gives it something no rival can match. Philips therefore gives with one hand and takes with the other: it adds a uniquely immersive viewing atmosphere but limits your freedom when it comes to choosing apps. If all the services you use are available, this may well be a compromise worth making.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Good
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Silver
Graphite
Stand
Height adjustment, Base adjustment
Swivel
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7/10

10/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 240 (20 x 12)

Contrast:

Review Samsung QN85F  Contrast and black detail

Result

101,800:1

Review Samsung QN85F  Contrast and black detail

Result

18,650:1

Review Samsung QN85F  Contrast and black detail

Result

47,050:1

Review Samsung QN85F  Contrast and black detail

Result

9,700:1

Review Samsung QN85F  Contrast and black detail

Result

4,350:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED811 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

Our editorial team received a 55-inch model with a VA panel. In the case of NeoQLEDs, which are TVs with Mini-LED backlighting, size is incredibly important because the larger the screen, the more local dimming zones it can have. This directly translates to higher contrast. In the variant we tested, we counted as many as 240 dimming zones, which is twice as many as in last year's QN85D. Theoretically, such an increase should bring an equally impressive improvement in contrast. Unfortunately, practice showed something different – the QN85F offers results very similar to its predecessor. Yes, in some scenes with a lot of black or in areas where details in the highlights are crucial, there is progress, but it is not proportional to the number of zones. Mini-LED technology can be capricious, and sometimes around small, bright objects, there are subtle halos. This is a typical compromise that one must accept with such a solution. Nevertheless, the contrast in the QN85F is at a very high level and will easily satisfy most users, even the more demanding ones. However, we have the impression that Samsung could refine the algorithms controlling dimming because we know from experience that they can perform really well in other models.

Black level and contrast are areas where the Philips OLED811 showcases all the strengths of OLED technology. Each pixel lights independently and can be turned completely off, so black is simply black. No gray halo or blooming around bright objects. In evening viewing this delivers a great effect: stars in the night sky, city lights, and text on dark backgrounds remain clearly separated from perfectly black surroundings.

So you shouldn't expect improvements here compared with other OLEDs, because in terms of black depth and contrast the result is already exemplary. The OLED811 doesn't need local dimming or any compromise between the brightness of a small object and the black around it. Even a single bright point can sit next to a completely switched-off pixel, giving the picture outstanding depth.

This is exactly where the advantage over Mini LED TVs becomes apparent in scenes with lots of black. Even the most advanced local dimming systems control larger areas of the image, so in demanding shots they can produce a halo around bright elements or dim them to preserve a dark background. The Philips OLED811 doesn't have that problem.

HDR effect quality

6.9/10

7.6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 89.7%, Bt.2020: 69.8%
DCI P3: 99.0%, Bt.2020: 74.5%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung QN85F  Brightness measurement

Result

1248 nit

Review Samsung QN85F  Brightness measurement

Result

860 nit

Review Samsung QN85F  Brightness measurement

Result

1093 nit

Review Samsung QN85F  Brightness measurement

Result

465 nit

Review Samsung QN85F  Brightness measurement

Result

957 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1225 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1310 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1443 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

1368 nit

Review Philips OLED811 Brightness measurement

Result

626 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips OLED811

Samsung QN85F

Luminance of RGB colors

Although the more than double number of dimming zones compared to its predecessor has not translated into a spectacular jump in black levels and contrast, we definitely felt it in the HDR effect itself. The QN85F is up to 50% brighter than last year's model, making a huge impression in dynamic scenes. The peak brightness can reach nearly 1700–1800 nits, which is truly impressive in this Mini-LED class. The best part is that almost regardless of the scene being viewed, the HDR effect remains strong and vibrant. In four out of five test scenes, the brightness was around 1000 nits, a level that in most cases allows viewers to feel the true magic of this format. Of course, in scene number 4 from the movie Sicario 2, the limitations of Mini-LED technology become apparent – the brightness of the helicopter's spotlight drops to around 500 nits. It's not an outstanding result, but it's still much more acceptable than in last year's model. Samsung deserves applause, as the improvement in brightness in the QN85F is substantial compared to its predecessor. However, it's a pity about a certain trend seen in this year’s televisions – the manufacturer has worsened the color gamut coverage. Although the QN85F has a QLED panel, its result of around 90% DCI-P3 is average, and in the most demanding films, it can lead to less vibrant colors than in the predecessor. Despite this shortcoming, the overall HDR effect is at an excellent level and really makes a big impression in this class of devices.

Philips OLED811 uses the new generation WOLED EX panels, also found in models like the LG C6 and Samsung S90H. After calibration we measured around 1500 nits, which is a very good result for an OLED TV. You can see it clearly in movies and series. All kinds of light flashes have the right intensity, especially when they appear on a dark background. In such scenes the OLED811 can deliver truly impressive HDR. Of course, that doesn't mean you'll see that peak brightness in every shot. When the screen is filled with a large area of white or a big explosion, brightness falls to around 600 nits. That's still a good result, but those scenes no longer have the same punch as small, bright elements on a dark background. This is a known limitation of OLEDs, and the OLED811 is no exception.

Colors

Aside from HDR brightness, colors also matter, and Philips performs very well here too. It covers almost the entire DCI-P3 gamut, which contains most of the colors used in HDR movies and series. So you get rich reds and lush greens, and while watching it's hard to find major faults in this area. It looks a bit worse with the much wider BT.2020 gamut — its most saturated shades are already beyond the reach of this panel. Added to that is the issue of the white subpixel the WOLED panel uses to help boost brightness. With very bright colors you can see some "whitening": the color is bright but loses some of its saturation. In exactly these situations QD-OLED panels from Samsung Display have the advantage. In most movies and series, however, this won't be something that immediately stands out.

Factory color reproduction

4.8/10

7.8/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

The Samsung QN85F offers several preset picture modes, but out of the box, the television starts in "Eco" mode. We could actually end the discussion here, because for such a model, using this setting makes no sense – the picture is washed out, unpleasant, and far from what we expect from a television of this class. Therefore, we conducted our tests in the best available mode, which is the Filmmaker mode. Its purpose is to faithfully reproduce what the directors saw while filming, and indeed, this setting performs best among all the factory options. However, this does not mean it is free of flaws.

Both in SDR and HDR, the QN85F strongly highlighted warm colors. This stemmed from a lack of white balance, with a noticeable absence of blue. Additionally, the picture sometimes appeared overexposed – both the gamma brightness characteristic and the EOTF curve indicated that the television has a tendency to blow out scenes. In SDR, the color reproduction errors (Delta E at levels of 4–5) were still acceptable, but in HDR, the inaccuracies became really significant and clearly deviated from what the creators intended to show us. Fortunately, Samsung provides a wide range of calibration tools in its televisions, so – as always – we proceeded with professional calibration to see how much could be improved.

The movie mode on the Philips OLED811 is sensibly configured right out of the box. Most color errors are minor, both in SDR and HDR, so you can sit down and watch without first adjusting the settings. There are no major inaccuracies that would immediately pull attention away from the film.

It's not perfect, though. The white balance shows a slight deficiency of red compared with green, so whites and grays can have a faint greenish tint. It's not a strong cast, but measurements clearly show it. There are also small brightness deviations in SDR: some areas of the picture are slightly lifted, and the deepest blacks aren't always rendered evenly. In HDR the TV tracks the reference much more closely, although in places it slightly pulls details out of the shadows. These are generally things to refine. The factory movie mode provides a good starting point, and calibration will show how much more you can get out of it.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.5/10

9.3/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibrating the movie mode, we managed to tame the colors in both modes to nearly perfection – most of them did not exceed an error value of 3, which is the limit of visibility to the human eye. The image became more natural, fuller, and at the same time devoid of the blooming that was noticeable right after taking the TV out of the box. This shows how much potential lies in the QN85F and how well it responds to precise settings. However, this does not change the fact that certain technological barriers cannot be overcome. Despite the significant benefits of calibration, limitations of the panel itself still remain. Although the number of dimming zones has doubled compared to its predecessor, the algorithms controlling the backlighting can manipulate brightness in their own way. Sometimes this leads to slight color distortions or subtly visible halo effects around bright objects. Nonetheless, the reception after calibration is really pleasant and shows how good a screen the QN85F can be if we just take a moment for the right settings.

After calibration the Philips OLED811 produces an image very close to the reference. We managed to even out the white balance and remove the subtle color cast visible in the factory settings. Errors in Color Checker measurements for SDR and HDR dropped to around 1 to 2, and many samples even fall below 1. That's a level at which it's hard to spot differences from the reference image with the naked eye. We also improved the gamma, and only in the brightest whites a slight brightening remains. In HDR the EOTF curve also stays close to the reference, although the TV still tends to slightly boost the brightness of small elements like stars or subtitles. That gives the image a bit of extra glow that shouldn't be there, but otherwise there's little to complain about. It was already good out of the box, and after calibration we managed to refine most of the remaining shortcomings.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9/10

7.5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

Minor color errors are practically unnoticeable; it is the smoothness of tonal transitions that is a category that even a less experienced viewer will notice. Unfortunate bands and artificial lines can completely ruin the perception of the image. Fortunately, the QN85F handles this aspect almost perfectly. Gradients are smooth, transitions between colors are seamless, and there are no artificial strokes or clear lines separating the hues on the screen. The image remains cohesive, and nothing distracts our attention from the content. Only under very extreme conditions did we notice slight issues in the gray palette, but this is a drawback typical of most televisions and it's hard to consider it a serious downside. In practice, while watching movies, we encountered no problems.

Compared with Philips’ previous OLEDs, the smoothness of tonal transitions has clearly improved. The biggest difference is visible in the dark parts of the image, which can give WOLED panels a lot of trouble. On the OLED811 they have been smoothed out very well; tones transition smoothly from one to another without obvious banding or visible steps. That’s a big plus, especially when watching dark scenes. Unfortunately, it’s not as good in brighter scenes. This is where we have the biggest reservations: instead of smooth transitions between tones you can sometimes see distinct boundaries, a posterization effect. It can be noticeable, and it’s a shame that the improvement seen in dark scenes didn’t extend to the bright areas to the same degree.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

6.8/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Although the native tonal transitions on the QN85F perform excellently with 4K materials, we don't always deal with content in the highest resolution. That's when it becomes crucial how the television handles upscaling and digital image processing. This process is managed by Samsung's proprietary processor – AI NQ4 Gen2. In practice, it works very efficiently. If visible color banding or other undesirable phenomena appear on the screen, for example in materials from YouTube, they can be easily smoothed out using the "noise reduction" function. Set to medium, it improves tonal transitions while not excessively blurring desired details. However, it's important to remember that – as with most Samsung televisions – this feature significantly affects the film grain. Therefore, during movie screenings, it's advisable to use it cautiously to maintain the natural character of the image.

The upscaling itself looks very good. Test materials in lower resolutions were displayed sharply and clearly, with a lot of detail. The only drawback remains the issue of overscan, which is cutting off the edges of the screen. In most situations, this is not noticeable, but with very old materials below HD quality, there may be instances where part of the image on the left side is slightly cropped.

The OLED811 handles lower-quality content reasonably well, though it's far from perfect. The "Artifact Reduction" feature helps smooth tonal transitions and on the low setting delivers a pretty good result. It doesn't remove banding between shades as effectively as similar solutions from some competitors, but at least it doesn't introduce new artifacts. That's a sensible setting for everyday viewing. Still, there's some disappointment, because the MediaTek Pentonic 800 chip used here can, in other manufacturers' implementations, deal more effectively with heavy compression even at similarly low settings. A lot therefore depends on how each manufacturer uses its capabilities. We have a few more reservations about the 4K upscaling itself. There is plenty of detail, but the overall image looks fairly soft. Edges are heavily smoothed, which robs the picture of some sharpness and clarity. You can partly correct that with the sharpness slider in the menu, though that will just emphasize outlines rather than recover detail. On the plus side, there is no overscan, so even with an SD signal the TV does not crop the edges of the picture.

Blur and motion smoothness

7/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
165Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
68%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur (4K@165Hz ):

Motion blur and fluidity of motion in the QN85F is a topic worth discussing in more detail, as the television is equipped not with a standard 120 Hz panel, but with a 144 Hz panel. The additional hertz will primarily be appreciated by PC gamers, but the mere presence of such an option can be seen as a nice addition and a sign of the times – it’s hard to complain about the trend towards faster panels, since in practice, each of us would like the image to be as fluid as possible. However, the most important thing is how the television handles typical 120 Hz refresh rates – in the case of consoles, sports, or films recorded at 24 or 30 frames per second. And here, the QN85F performs really well. In movies, you can easily adjust the character of the image thanks to the “picture clarity” function, where we find two adjustable sliders. Key for viewing sessions is the one responsible for reducing motion blur. Lower values give the image a more cinematic character with preserved “frame rate,” while higher values lead to a strong smoothing that resembles television theater.

In terms of motion handling, the OLED811 performs excellently. At 120 Hz, which is useful for console gaming and watching sports, the image stays clear and moving objects don’t leave noticeable trails. The fast response of OLED pixels helps here; you can see it clearly in the UFO test, even on dark backgrounds. There are also motion-smoothing controls. For movies you can adjust the strength of smoothing to your taste, ranging from preserving a cinematic feel to much smoother motion. A separate motion blur reduction control is useful for fast-paced content like live sports broadcasts.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.6/10

9.5/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 165Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Warning Yes, high input lag
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The Samsung QN85F makes a great impression in terms of features for gamers. It has four HDMI 2.1 ports, so we can easily connect several devices at once. There is also variable refresh rate (VRR) to prevent screen tearing, as well as automatic game mode (ALLM), which allows the TV to switch to the appropriate settings automatically when we start the console. Additionally, it supports refresh rates of up to 144 Hz – something that PC gamers will particularly appreciate, but the mere fact that such an option is available shows that Samsung is fully supporting gamers. The Game Bar panel deserves praise as well. It's a quick glance at key parameters – from frame rate to refresh mode to shortcuts for picture settings. Instead of sifting through the entire menu, everything is at our fingertips, which turns out to be really convenient in practice. However, the most interesting addition is the Game Motion Plus feature. It's nothing more than motion smoothing, transferred into the gaming world. When enabled, the picture becomes smoother, sometimes it even looks as though we're getting several more frames, and importantly, the response delay does not increase enough to interfere with gameplay. This solution truly sets Samsung's 120Hz TVs apart from the competition.

[UPDATE] We have updated our tests of Samsung TVs for the 2025 model year due to the release of software version 1131, which restored the crucial feature for gamers, HGiG.

The only serious downside remains the lack of proper HGiG support. This is a standard responsible for correct tone mapping in HDR games, ensuring that brightness and contrast are displayed as intended by the creators. Without HGiG, we have to adjust the brightness manually, which doesn’t always yield ideal results. The feature was available in previous models, but it disappeared from the QN85F after one of the updates. We hope that Samsung will quickly fix this issue, and we will keep checking to see if it has been resolved.

OLED811 has almost everything you could expect from a gaming TV. It supports 120 Hz at Full HD, 1440p and 4K resolutions, and when connected to a PC can reach 165 Hz. It also has VRR, which helps avoid screen tearing with variable frame rates, and ALLM, which automatically switches to game mode. So you don't have to dig into the settings every time you power up your console.

HGiG also works correctly, so once you enable HDR on the console the TV doesn't apply its own brightness adjustments. There's also a Game Bar that lets you check signal parameters and quickly change settings useful while gaming. The list even includes Dolby Vision for games, but there's a significant catch, which you'll read about below.

Input lag

9.8/10

8.8/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
14 ms
1080p120
9 ms
5 ms
2160p60
16 ms
14 ms
2160p120
9 ms
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
14 ms
2160p120
12 ms
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
157 ms
2160p120 DV
57 ms

The input lag on the QN85F is at a very high level. With content at 120 or 144 Hz, the values often oscillated below 10 ms, which is an absolutely remarkable result. Naturally, when playing at 60 Hz, the lag doubles, but it still remains low enough that in practice it is virtually unnoticeable. Thanks to this, the QN85F will be suitable for both dynamic e-sports games and calmer console titles.

OLED811 responds instantly. We measured 14 ms at 60 Hz and just 5 ms at 120 Hz, both in Full HD and 4K. Those are excellent results that let you comfortably play even fast-paced online titles. Unfortunately, enabling Dolby Vision changes things dramatically: at 60 Hz latency rises to 157 ms, and at 120 Hz it’s 57 ms. The first value in particular already means a clearly noticeable delay between input on the controller and the on-screen response. For gaming it’s definitely better to stick with HDR10.

Compatibility with PC

8.4/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
9ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGWB
Max refresh rate
144Hz
165Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

The QN85F performs really well in terms of cooperation with a computer. Thanks to the PC mode with a refresh rate of up to 144 Hz, support for G-Sync, and low input lag, gaming on a personal computer is very enjoyable and should not cause irritation even for more demanding players. The readability of fonts also looks good – the television supports chroma 4:4:4, so standard texts appear sharp and clear. A problem arises only with very thin letters. Regardless of the refresh rate setting – whether it’s 144, 120, or 60 Hz – horizontal, thin lines were hardly visible. Reducing the refresh rate slightly improved the situation, but never enough to say that they were displayed perfectly.

Philips OLED811 works very well with a computer. The manufacturer finally managed to correctly implement 4:4:4 chroma even at maximum resolution and refresh rate. That means small text and colored outlines are legible, without blurring or the rainbow fringing that results from loss of color information. Dark text on dark backgrounds also performs well, which TVs can struggle with. There are still minor imperfections related to the RGWB subpixel layout. Fonts aren't as sharp as on a classic RGB monitor, and with white letters you can see subtle red outlines up close. From a normal viewing distance you hardly notice it, though sitting close to the screen at a desk makes it easier to spot.

The most fun, though, is PC gaming. The combination of 4K at 165 Hz, working G-Sync, and input lag around 5 ms makes the OLED811 excellent for that. If you have a computer that can take advantage of that refresh rate, it's definitely worth hooking it up to the Philips TV.

Viewing angles

3.2/10

7.8/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
73%
32%

The viewing angles on the QN85F are a classic Achilles' heel of most LCD TVs with VA panels. When looking at the screen at an angle, there is a noticeable drop in brightness fairly quickly, and whites begin to gray out while colors lose their intensity. This is the price to pay for the high contrast that this technology offers. Samsung could have aimed for a better coating to widen the viewing angles in this model, but it is not found here. In practice, this means that the best viewing experience will be achieved when sitting directly in front of the TV, and any significant deviation will result in a clear loss of image quality.

Viewing angles on the OLED811 are excellent and among the best on the market. Even sitting well off to the side, you still see the picture with deep blacks and well-saturated colors. That's a big advantage over LCD screens: you don't have to sit exactly in front to enjoy good picture quality.

QD-OLED panels perform even better, preserving colors more accurately at an angle. On the Philips, at wider viewing angles whites shift slightly toward a greenish tint, but the effect is so minor that it's hard to find it bothersome while watching. We'd even say that in this respect we encountered the best WOLED unit we've tested so far.

Daytime performance

6.9/10

6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Glare
Reflection suppression
Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

Philips OLED811: 392 cd/m2

Samsung QN85F : 690 cd/m2

QN85F performs excellently during the day. The satin coating of the panel combined with high brightness makes it a television designed for bright rooms. Colors do not lose their intensity, and the image does not wash out even when a lot of light comes in. The television itself is bright enough to handle a living room with large south-facing windows without any problems. Thus, the QN85F provides an image that allows us to watch movies or games during the day without annoying reflections and the feeling that the picture is fading in the sunlight.

OLED811 handles daytime viewing fairly well, though in a very bright living room it already has its limits. Maximum SDR brightness reaches about 600 nits, comparable to the LG C6 or the Samsung S90H, which use the same panel. That's noticeably higher than basic OLEDs and will be more than enough for most people. Keep in mind, however, that this brightness isn't maintained across the whole screen; with a lot of white it drops, and the average of our measurements was about 392 nits.

Direct reflections from windows or lamps can be a bigger problem. The glossy coating reduces them reasonably well, but you can still see them clearly on the screen, especially in dark scenes. It doesn't diffuse them as effectively as matte screens, so placing the TV opposite a large window isn't the best idea. On the plus side, black levels remain very good during the day. In a typical living room the Philips will perform without major issues, but if strong sunlight falls directly on the screen, you'll want blinds.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
WRGB OLED
Software version during testing
T-PTMFDEUC-0090-1126.0, E2540300, BT-S
TPM267E_V167.002.054.151
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung QN85F TV Panel details
Review Philips OLED811 TV Panel details

Samsung QN85F

Philips OLED811

TV features

7.3/10

7.9/10

  • System
    Tizen
    Titan OS
  • System performance
    Good
    Good
  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung QN85F  TV features
Review Samsung QN85F  TV features
Review Samsung QN85F  TV features
Review Samsung QN85F  TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features
Review Philips OLED811 TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Smart TV and Tizen System

The Samsung QN85F runs on the proprietary Tizen operating system, which has been one of the strongest points of the Korean manufacturer for years. The platform operates quickly, is comprehensive, and provides access to virtually all necessary applications. We have AirPlay support, the ability to mirror the screen, voice search, and a very clear interface. Everything is controlled by a remote with a minimal number of buttons, designed to give us quick access to the most important applications.

Classic TV Features

When it comes to classic television functions, the QN85F offers a rather basic set. The EPG interface is readable and easy to use, resembling a traditional teletext program list. A downside is the lack of USB recording and the absence of PiP functionality, which Samsung offered in many other models. This is because the QN85F uses single tuners. For some people, this may be a drawback, but looking at how few viewers today use traditional linear television, it will not matter much for most users.

SmartThings and Device Support

A strong element of the entire platform is the SmartThings application. With it, we can integrate the television with other home devices—not just those from Samsung. We can connect Philips Hue or Yeelight smart lighting, video intercoms, and many other devices to the system. SmartThings also allows us to control the television without using the traditional remote— we can use the app on our smartphone, mouse mode, or gesture control if we have a Samsung smartwatch. This makes the QN85F part of a larger ecosystem and fits excellently into the trend of the IoT smart home.

Smart features: Titan OS

It's the Smart TV system that is the most controversial change in the OLED811. Philips dropped the user-favorite Google TV in favor of its own Titan OS. For many people this may be hard to accept, although Titan has been getting better every year and runs noticeably smoother. We have working AirPlay, screen mirroring from a computer, and voice search in Polish. System responsiveness has improved too, though minor delays still occur when navigating menus. We suspect the infrared remote is partly to blame, as it doesn't always register commands immediately. The biggest limitation compared with Google TV remains a smaller app selection. That doesn't mean it's empty — you'll find Netflix, Prime Video, Disney+, CANAL+, and Apple TV was recently added to the library. If you mainly use popular services, Titan should be enough, but it's worth checking availability of lesser-known apps before buying (list at the bottom 😉).

Ambilight

Ambilight is still one of the best reasons to consider a Philips. On the OLED811 it's three-sided — LEDs at the top and along the sides of the chassis light the wall with colors matched to what's happening on screen. In the evening it creates a great effect and can change the mood of the whole room, which is why we awarded extra points for this feature. You don't have to use dynamic picture tracking though. If you prefer calmer viewing conditions, you can set a steady white light. That's a nice option for evening sessions when you don't want to sit in front of a bright screen in a completely dark room.

Classic features

For regular TV watching the OLED811 performs well, although there is no USB recording or picture-in-picture (PiP). You can connect Bluetooth headphones and use them at the same time as the TV speakers. What bothers us most is the aforementioned infrared control. The remote itself is really interestingly designed: it has backlighting and a hybrid keyboard with a numeric section. It's a shame you have to aim it at the TV like with old remotes. For equipment at this level we'd prefer to just press buttons without wondering which way we're holding the remote. Hopefully Philips will fix that in future models.

Apps

9.3/10

7.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

8.6/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
No
6 Mpix
Yes
No
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The player in the QN85F works as most people expect, supporting virtually all popular formats and is sufficiently capable even for more demanding users. Movies, music, photos – everything launches without issues. The only hiccup occurs with HEIC files, which are images from Apple devices. According to the specifications, they should work, but in practice, they simply do not open. Thumbnails are visible, but the file itself refuses to launch. This seems to be just a regular software bug. Apart from that one case, the player performs well and gives no reasons for complaints.

The USB player in the OLED811 handles most of the audio and video formats we test, so it’s perfectly fine for watching a movie or playing music from a USB flash drive. Our biggest complaints are with photos, specifically the oddly selective handling of their resolutions. The TV opened files at 8, 16 and 32 MP, but couldn’t deal with the rest. It’s not that the photos are simply too large; the player can display a higher-resolution image yet refuse to open a smaller one. When browsing vacation photos this can be plain annoying, because some will have to be converted on a computer first... or you can just use remote screen capture... 😉

Sound

7.6/10

7.6/10

  • Maximum volume
    84dB
    93dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

The Samsung QN85F is equipped with a 2.2 system with a power of 40 W and performs really well for built-in speakers. The bass is pleasant, and the dialogues are clear and easy to hear even during louder scenes. Even at maximum volume, the television does not produce any unwanted vibrations, and nothing creaks. At the bottom of the housing, there is a subwoofer responsible for the bass, so it’s important to ensure that it is not obstructed during installation.

As for formats, the QN85F does not support DTS:X audio, which for Samsung has been a standard for several years now, forcing Blu-ray enthusiasts to connect audio devices first to the home theater and then to the television. In return, however, we get support for the more popular Dolby Atmos format, which can add extra space to the sound in movies and series.

When it comes to sound, there have been a few concrete changes compared with last year’s OLED820. The rear subwoofer has been removed, and the 4.1 speaker layout has been replaced by a 2.2 configuration. Despite those changes, the OLED811 still sounds good and quite balanced. It can play louder, and the sound even seems a bit fuller than last year. The bass has taken a hit, though. While the sound has some weight, the low end lacks the depth of the previous model. You notice this most in films and music, when you’re waiting for a bigger impact. Still, this is definitely well above average for built-in TV speakers. If you want deeper bass and clearer spatial effects, it’s worth considering a soundbar or a system with an AV receiver. Philips gives you a lot of flexibility here: it supports both Dolby Atmos and DTS, and can pass Dolby TrueHD tracks over HDMI eARC to compatible equipment without issue. So there’s plenty to take advantage of if we decide to expand the sound system later.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

84dBC (Max)

75dBC

93dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy