Samsung QN80F 100" vs SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2)

Direct comparison

Check the best price offer:

Samsung QN80F 100"
$4 587

BRAVIA 3 II / XR35M2

Available screen sizes: 100”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”85”100”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.5

7.0

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.2

    6.5

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    7.0

    6.3

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.7

    6.7

  • Gaming on console

    8.9

    8.1

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    7.2

  • Watching in bright light

    7.0

    5.8

  • Utility functions

    7.7

    7.9

  • Apps

    9.3

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    6.7

    6.8

Advantages

  • HDR brightness up to 1300 nits

  • Good black levels - MiniLED with a VA panel

  • Fast 144 Hz panel and 4 HDMI 2.1 ports

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, and great gamebar

  • Low input lag (<10 ms)

  • Fast Tizen operating system with SmartThings support

  • Supports Dolby Atmos

  • Very good motion clarity and exceptionally low motion blur for a 120Hz LCD TV

  • 4 × HDMI 2.1 48 Gbps, finally!

  • Lots of gaming features: VRR, ALLM, low input lag

  • Wide color gamut, QLED (PFS)

  • Supports Dolby Vision

  • Google TV with a wide range of apps and features

  • Broad audio format support: Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Record programs to USB

  • Two remotes included

Disadvantages

No like
  • Poor viewing angles

  • Modest number of dimming zones for a 100" screen

  • Missing Dolby Vision

  • High price relative to its capabilities; for only a little more you can buy the much better BRAVIA 5

  • No local dimming

  • Lacks proper HGiG support

  • Average processing of lower-quality content

Our verdict

QN80F is the first "eighty" from Samsung available in a 100-inch version (previously "only" 98 inches 😉) and it is also the model that has made it into the series with Mini LED backlighting. And it must be admitted that at this scale, it performs really well. Although the number of dimming zones is not impressive considering such a huge screen, the contrast and blacks are at a solid level, and combined with high brightness, the TV can deliver great experiences in HDR movies and series. The 144 Hz panel ensures smooth motion, and the full set of features for gamers – VRR, ALLM, or Game Motion Plus – makes it hard to define the QN80F as anything other than a screen designed for both console and PC. Additionally, there is fast and stable Tizen, which provides access to all key applications and can act as a smart home hub thanks to the proprietary SmartThings app. Of course, there are some shortcomings – there is no Dolby Vision, no USB recording, and the viewing angles at 100 inches can be really problematic. Mini LED still has its limitations, so those expecting absolutely perfect blacks need to keep this in mind. On the other hand, given the current prices of OLEDs in such sizes, it is hard to talk about real competition.

QN80F is a versatile TV, well-crafted, and providing a lot of satisfaction on a daily basis. Looking at the history of this series, one can be sure that as soon as it appears at reasonable promotions, it will be one of the most interesting offers in its class. And if Samsung refines the minor shortcomings with updates, this 100-inch beast could prove truly difficult to beat just like its smaller variants.

The Sony Bravia 3 II is a TV that quickly reveals what the manufacturer had in mind for this model. It's meant above all to be a sensible Bravia for gaming, and in that respect the changes are substantial. After all, Sony fixed one of the biggest complaints about its TVs: having only two full HDMI 2.1 ports. Here there are four, and that alone makes the Bravia 3 II a much more convenient choice for anyone who wants to hook up a lot of gaming gear. Fortunately it doesn't stop at gaming. The 120 Hz panel performs very well in terms of motion, motion blur is minimal, and the motion-enhancing systems work surprisingly effectively, sometimes even better than on Sony's top TVs. That's why sports are another use where the Bravia 3 II feels right at home. Add Google TV with its full suite of apps and features, and in terms of everyday use it's the Sony we've known for years.

The biggest problem with this model, however, isn't the TV itself but its current price. The Bravia 3 II is today priced dangerously close to the Bravia 5, and when the premium for the higher model is only a few percent, choosing the lower series starts to lose its point. The Bravia 5 already offers full Mini-LED backlighting with local dimming, exactly what the Bravia 3 II most lacks for evening viewing and in HDR. That's why we look at this model through the lens of price. The Bravia 3 II is a genuinely successful lower midrange TV and, at the right price, could easily be one of the more interesting choices for a gamer or sports fan. However, if the gap to the Bravia 5 remains small, it will be hard to recommend it with full conviction.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Good
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Base adjustment
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand
Two remote controls, Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.1/10

5.6/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 120 (10 x 12)

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Samsung QN80F 100"  Contrast and black detail

Result

94,400:1

Review Samsung QN80F 100"  Contrast and black detail

Result

12,650:1

Review Samsung QN80F 100"  Contrast and black detail

Result

31,750:1

Review Samsung QN80F 100"  Contrast and black detail

Result

7,350:1

Review Samsung QN80F 100"  Contrast and black detail

Result

3,000:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,050:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,650:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,850:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

6,400:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,350:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The QN80F belongs to the NeoQLED family, which consists of Samsung TVs based on mini-LED technology. In practice, this means local dimming zones that are intended to improve contrast and light separation. In the case of the 100-inch version, we have a VA panel combined with about 120 zones – a rather modest result for such a large surface, although it must be acknowledged that it still translates into noticeably better results than in smaller screens. In its best cinematic scenes, the contrast can be really strong – five-digit values are not an exaggeration, and the lights separate from the blacks in a way that makes a significant impression at first glance. However, you cannot deceive physics. Since such a huge screen must "work" with a relatively small number of zones, there are moments when the TV struggles with image control. For example, when a multitude of bright, small elements appears on a black background in the final scene of a movie, there are visible halos around them. This shows that even with a refined algorithm, mini-LED still has its limitations. Generally, however, the contrast can be considered very good, and in everyday viewing, most users will be fully satisfied. One just has to remember that this model will not provide absolute blacks, known from OLEDs. The same goes for any LCD TV.

The Bravia 3 II uses a VA panel, a solution that by design provides much better contrast than IPS or ADS panels. In our unit the native contrast was about 5000:1, which is a pretty good result for a TV without local dimming. In practice this means that in a mildly lit room blacks can look really decent. Dark parts of the image don't immediately turn gray, and night scenes have noticeably more depth than on many IPS-panel TVs. However, the poorer black performance becomes apparent when you turn off the lights. The Bravia 3 II doesn't have local dimming, so the entire backlight behaves similarly regardless of what's happening in any particular area of the image. In a dark room it's easy to see that black is no longer truly black but starts to shift toward a dark navy. It's not at a level that seriously ruins the movie experience, but during an evening viewing the difference versus a Mini-LED, and even more so versus an OLED TV, becomes very clear.

HDR effect quality

6.5/10

5.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 90.0%, Bt.2020: 67.9%
DCI P3: 94.2%, Bt.2020: 73.9%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung QN80F 100"  Brightness measurement

Result

1150 nit

Review Samsung QN80F 100"  Brightness measurement

Result

721 nit

Review Samsung QN80F 100"  Brightness measurement

Result

875 nit

Review Samsung QN80F 100"  Brightness measurement

Result

377 nit

Review Samsung QN80F 100"  Brightness measurement

Result

849 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

408 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

430 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

449 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

457 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

455 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2)

Samsung QN80F 100"

When it comes to HDR in Filmmaker mode, the QN80F can make a great first impression on you. Our lab tests showed that under the best conditions, the TV can achieve brightness exceeding 1200–1300 nits. These are truly remarkable results, which make HDR effects in many films look incredible. The TV is simply bright enough that it doesn’t need to artificially adapt the picture – bright parts of scenes have the right "power" and actually look like a light source. Of course, the lab is one thing, and everyday viewing is another. In practice, during movie scenes, brightness usually oscillates between 700–1100 nits. These are still great values that, in most cases, give a strong sense of realism and make the lights on screen really capable of dazzling you. The problem arises in exceptionally challenging sequences, where, like almost every mini-LED, it reveals its limitations. A good example is Sicario 2: scenes with helicopters in the night sky look much weaker, and the lights lose intensity, dropping to around 370 nits, making it hard to speak of serious admiration. This leads us to the topic of colors. Although we are dealing with a QLED, the coverage of the DCI-P3 color palette is about 90%. This is fairly average for a quantum dot TV. In practice, this means that some colors may appear less saturated than we would expect, especially in demanding HDR productions.

Bravia 3 II is certainly not a TV that tries to impress with brightness. In our measurements it reached about 450 nits, so it's far from the strongest designs on the market. That said, HDR here is not just a paper feature. Compared with regular SDR material, the brightest parts of the image can already punch through, and reflections, highlights, or stronger exposures have a bit more energy and stand out better from the rest of the scene. You can see this best in simpler shots where many bright elements appear on screen. Then the Bravia 3 II can give a hint of a higher-dynamic-range picture. The problem only starts with more demanding content, where much greater brightness headroom is needed. There the TV quickly shows its limits and instead of strong, striking HDR we get only a correctly rendered picture.

Colors

Bravia 3 II uses a QLED-type panel, although technically it does not use a traditional quantum-dot layer. Instead Sony applied a PFS phosphor-based solution that serves a very similar role: it allows for more saturated reds and greens and thus lets the TV display a much wider color gamut. Measurements showed about 94% coverage of the DCI-P3 gamut and about 74.4% of the very wide BT.2020. Those are good results for this class of hardware, meaning the Bravia 3 II has no problem showing adequately saturated colors in HDR content. Colors don't look washed out, and the more intense shades can look really attractive.

Factory color reproduction

6/10

6.3/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

Samsung QN80F performs best in Filmmaker mode, which is designed to faithfully convey the creators' intentions. And indeed – it is a mode in which the TV showcases its potential. But let’s not deceive ourselves, it is far from perfect. In SDR content, a problem with white balance became apparent. Slight deficiencies in green and a clear excess of red caused the screen to take on a pinkish hue. You don’t even need measuring tools to notice this – in everyday viewing, the slightly shifted color palette could be quite noticeable, and in color checker tests, colors were even "jumping" out of their reference fields. With HDR content, the situation was a bit better, as the white balance was closer to ideal, but another problem emerged – brightness management. The EOTF curve often caused the image to become too bright, which spoiled the perception of contrast, and in dynamic scenes led to a slight "flickering" in the reception. We actually already mentioned this in the sections about black levels and HDR. The good news, however, is that Samsung provides a lot of tools for improvement. The QN80F allows for really detailed calibration, including a 20-point white balance. And since the manufacturer left us so many options, we decided to see how the TV would perform after solid corrections.

In Professional mode the Bravia 3 II, straight out of the box, delivers a fairly good level of color reproduction. In SDR the most noticeable issue is a slightly low gamma, which makes the midtone areas a bit brighter. White balance is not perfect either; as brightness increases there is a slight lack of blue and red, so whites can sometimes take on a slightly warmer, mildly greenish tint. However, these are not errors that immediately stand out while watching a movie. Average error values hover around 3, so the factory preset can be considered quite good. The situation is similar in HDR. Here again there is a slight deficiency in the blue component, so the image is a touch warmer than the reference, but the difference is not large enough to be significantly distracting during normal viewing.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.3/10

8/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibrating the QN80F, it immediately showed that it is capable of much more. The pink tint that could previously spoil the reception has disappeared, and the white balance finally looks as it should – natural and without excessive deviations. The colors have gained depth, and the image has become more saturated and consistent, making movies simply more enjoyable to watch. It's a bit like removing a light haze from the screen – suddenly everything seems sharper and clearer. Brightness management has also improved. The television no longer gets lost so easily in dynamic changes, and the EOTF graph shows that the curve tracking is much more stable. Of course, there are no miracles – the limited number of zones still means that small, bright elements can be slightly brightened, but that is due to the construction itself, not the settings. After this adjustment, the QN80F feels like a more mature piece of equipment, and watching movies finally provides the satisfaction one expects from a television even in the higher class.

After calibration you can get a lot out of SDR content. The white balance was set almost perfectly, gamma practically matches the reference value, and average color errors fell from around 3 to about 1. That's a level at which differences from the reference image are, in practice, very hard to detect. The Bravia 3 II therefore shows that despite its position in Sony's lineup it has quite a lot of potential for precise picture tuning. Improvements are also visible in HDR, although here you can no longer work around all of the TV's limitations. After equalizing the colors it's easier to notice that the EOTF curve in film material runs slightly below the reference value in places, meaning the Bravia 3 II slightly darkens part of the image. That's not ideal from a reference standpoint, but in this particular TV it also has an advantage. With no local dimming and average black levels, this behavior slightly reduces the visibility of the backlight in darker scenes and helps maintain a greater sense of contrast. So you could say Sony partially masks the limits of the panel that way, rather than trying at all costs to stick to the reference luminance.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9/10

9.5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

In terms of the smoothness of tonal transitions, meaning blending colors into one another, the QN80F performs really well. The color gradients are smooth, the image doesn’t break into artificial bands, and the sky or vast shadowed surfaces look as they should – without strange spots or disturbances. It particularly excels in scenes with dark tones, where many televisions tend to lose their way and generate ugly artifacts. Here, everything remains coherent and clear. Indeed, in the brightest areas, one can sometimes notice slight banding, but that’s a detail that only very discerning viewers analyzing the image frame by frame will catch. In everyday use, there is practically nothing to complain about. The QN80F provides a sense of assurance that tonal transitions will not be a distracting element.

In terms of tonal transition smoothness, the Bravia 3 II performs very well. In most of the scenes we watched, it was hard to spot any issues with blending individual shades. Gradients remain smooth both in bright parts of the image, like skies or sunsets, and in much more challenging dark shots. The only thing that may be noticeable in our photos, especially in the darkest scenes, is uneven backlighting. This is not related to color banding, but rather a consequence of using a backlight without local dimming.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

6/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

With lower quality materials, such as YouTube videos or older television recordings, the QN80F can showcase its stronger and weaker points. If strange color transitions or artifacts start appearing on the screen, it's worth using the noise reduction function. The best setting is at the "medium" level – it smooths out the problematic segments without blurring the entire image. However, one compromise must be kept in mind: this function always removes film grain. If someone enjoys its presence in older productions, it's better to leave the reduction turned off because, regardless of the setting, the grain simply disappears.

Resolution scaling, or upscaling, is another strong point of Samsung. The QN80F may not be the best TV on the market, but it performs very well in its price range, which is very important for such a large size as a 100-inch screen. Even low-quality materials can gain a second life – the image becomes sharper, more readable, and overall much more pleasant to view. A weak point remains overscan, or slight trimming of edges in very low resolutions (e.g., 576p), which has been a longstanding issue for Samsung. Fortunately, in everyday viewing of HD and 4K content, this practically doesn’t matter anymore.

The Bravia 3 II is Sony’s first TV to use the new MediaTek Pentonic 800 chipset, and you can see a few changes in image processing. Starting with the basics: upscaling is solid. The TV can sensibly upscale lower-resolution material and doesn’t have a strong tendency to overemphasize jagged edges or other source imperfections. With regular broadcast TV or lower-quality streaming the picture remains quite pleasing. We have more reservations about the digital image processing. In this model Sony replaced the well-known "Smooth Gradation" feature with a new setting called "Digital Noise Reduction." Its role is essentially the same: to smooth unpleasant tonal transitions and artifacts caused by heavy compression. Unfortunately, this feature performs noticeably worse than before. At the "Large" setting — the only one that noticeably affected the picture — the TV can smooth away too many image elements at once, causing film grain to disappear and surface textures or even character skin to start looking unnatural. Worse, the effect is not very consistent. When a scene contains more motion the function’s effect weakens significantly and at times it looks as if the TV stops intervening in the image altogether. For everyday viewing we therefore don’t recommend using it at a high level. It can help on a static shot, but the price is often too much loss of detail.

Blur and motion smoothness

7/10

8.2/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
120Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
BFI function 120Hz
No
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
Brightness drop with BFI
69%
25%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur ():

The QN80F features a 144 Hz panel, and this is evident in practice – with full refresh, the image is exceptionally smooth, and motion blur remains at an acceptable, barely noticeable level. However, this mode is mainly aimed at PC gamers. The most important reference point in everyday use remains a 120 Hz refresh rate, and here a certain discrepancy arises. During the UFO test, we noticed the blurring of contours of quickly moving objects – it looked as if the television had the BFI (Black Frame Insertion) function permanently enabled, which in practice led to an unpleasant double edge effect. We do not yet know if this is a software issue or a characteristic of this model, but in its current form, it is difficult to praise such behavior.

Motion handling is definitely one of the Bravia 3 II's strongest points. The TV uses a 120 Hz VA panel, a solution that by nature, despite the high refresh rate, doesn't always cope well with motion blur. Here Sony has managed to get that problem very well under control. Fast-moving objects remain sharp, and the characteristic trails and blurring are reduced to a very low level, if not to zero. It's one of the least smearing LCD TVs we've had the chance to test. Interestingly, in this respect the Bravia 3 II can even outperform the much more expensive flagship True RGB series: the Bravia 9 II.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.6/10

8.1/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 120Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Samsung QN80F gives the impression of a television designed with gamers in mind. On the list of advantages, we have a 144 Hz panel, four full HDMI 2.1 ports, complete support for VRR and ALLM, and one of the best-designed game bars on the market. In addition, there's the Game Motion Plus motion smoother, which works in games without actually increasing input lag, making the QN80F an absolute standout in this category. In practice, this means that you can enjoy a smoother picture without losing responsiveness, which is a dream for many console gamers!

As usual with Samsung, there’s a lack of Dolby Vision in games, and that's not surprising anymore. However, what surprised us much more is that in the 2025 models… the HGIG feature has disappeared. It was the feature that allowed consoles like PlayStation 5 or Xbox Series X to perfectly match HDR tone mapping to the capabilities of the television. In the current firmware of the QN80F, this option is simply not available—it seems more like a mistake than a conscious decision by the manufacturer, but on the day of testing, we have to acknowledge that HGIG is not available. Because of this one missing feature, the QN80F goes from being an almost perfect television for gamers to an "almost" perfect device. It's quite a shame because aside from this, Samsung has created a model that really sets the bar high in the gaming hardware segment.

[UPDATE] We have updated our tests of Samsung televisions from the 2025 lineup due to the release of software version 1131, which restored the crucial feature HGiG for gamers.

Sony Bravia 3 II is a very good TV for gamers, although not everything has been handled the way we'd like. The biggest change concerns the connections. For the first time in a Sony TV we get four full HDMI 2.1 ports with 48 Gb/s bandwidth, thanks to the new MediaTek Pentonic 800 chipset. That removes one of the long-standing issues that has plagued the manufacturer's TVs. You can connect several devices at once and use each input's full capabilities, including VRR and ALLM. There's also a simple Game Bar that lets you check key signal parameters and change a few useful settings, such as black level, when you want to improve visibility in darker parts of a game.

There are, however, two limitations worth knowing. The first is the lack of support for 1440p at 120 Hz. This won't be a problem for everyone, but people using that resolution on a console or PC, for example to get higher frame rates in certain games, will have to choose 1080p. We have more reservations about HGiG support. Sony does not allow disabling tone mapping on the Bravia 3 II, so the TV continuously processes HDR content even when you would prefer to leave that task to the console. You can most easily notice this during HDR setup. The checkerboard pattern does not disappear at the point corresponding to the TV's actual capabilities. That doesn't mean HDR in games will look bad. You just need to approach the setup a bit differently and, instead of relying on the pattern, manually set the peak brightness to about 450 nits. The issue can be worked around, but you should know about it before you start configuring your console.

Input lag

9.8/10

9.9/10

SDR

1080p60
17 ms
14 ms
1080p120
8 ms
8 ms
2160p60
17 ms
14 ms
2160p120
8 ms
8 ms

HDR

2160p60
17 ms
14 ms
2160p120
8 ms
8 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
14 ms
2160p120 DV
8 ms

Input lag is something that can ruin the entire fun, but fortunately, there's nothing to worry about with the QN80F. At 120 Hz, the lag drops below 10 ms, so it feels like the TV doesn't exist at all between the controller and the image. The response is immediate; everything happens exactly when we want it to. At 60 Hz, the result is around 17 ms – that's more, but still within the range of full comfort. In practice, console games look and operate smoothly, with no annoying lags in sight. This is the moment where it’s clear that Samsung really put effort into the gaming mode – the QN80F gives a sense of control and speed that one would expect more from a monitor rather than from a 100-inch behemoth in the living room.

In terms of input lag, the Bravia 3 II performs very well. With a 120 Hz signal the input lag is around 8 ms, while at 60 Hz it increases to about 14 ms, so in both cases the response to controls is very fast and during normal gaming you'd be hard-pressed to notice any delay. It's also a plus that the TV behaves well in Dolby Vision Gaming mode on Xbox. The input lag then remains practically just as low, and until recently Sony often had a noticeable problem with this.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

7.2/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Average
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
8ms
8ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
120Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Cooperating with a PC on the QN80F is a bit strange. When it comes to gaming, there’s no cause for concern: we have full support for 144 Hz, both G-Sync and FreeSync work, and the smoothness is truly impressive. The problem starts when using a computer for everyday tasks – especially when we are looking at fonts instead of games. At 120 Hz, the image looks nearly flawless. The letters are readable, sharp, and the only minor detail that can be noticed is a slight dimming of thin lines. However, this is a detail that shouldn’t interfere with normal usage. Bigger problems arise at 144 Hz, which is the mode that is supposedly designed for PC users. Instead of crystal-clear fonts, a strange anomaly appears. The TV adds shadows with tiny dots, causing the text to simply look odd. Fortunately, this is more of a curiosity than a real problem. After all, it’s hard to imagine someone putting a 100-inch colossus on a desk and staring at Excel or Word sheets from half a meter away. For gaming, the QN80F is excellent, and when working normally with a PC, it’s better to just stick to the 120 Hz mode.

Using it with a computer is generally good, although again not without a few reservations. The Bravia 3 II correctly supports 4:4:4 chroma, so in typical use text and the system UI look sharp and readable. However, gray fonts can draw attention, as their vertical edges are often noticeably brighter than the horizontal ones. On a larger screen that isn't particularly bothersome, but if you're considering the smaller Bravia 3 II as a monitor for working with text, it's worth keeping in mind. What bothers us more is the lack of additional higher-refresh-rate modes. It's not even about 144 or 165 Hz at 4K, but at least the option to get smoother motion at Full HD. This solution is appearing increasingly in competing TVs (DLG 240Hz), while Sony still doesn't offer it, even in its pricier models. For most users, 4K at 120 Hz will of course be perfectly adequate, especially for consoles, but people who also use the TV as a PC gaming monitor may be left wanting.

Viewing angles

3.1/10

3.3/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
71%
72%

The viewing angles are unfortunately a weak point of the QN80F. With smaller TVs, this can still be tolerated, but in the case of 100 inches, the flaw becomes much more noticeable. It is enough to sit slightly off to the side for the edges of the screen to appear fainter than its center. And when we try to watch something at a steeper angle, the image simply loses its charm – colors become washed out, contrast drops, and the depth visible straight on is lost. It’s a shame that with such a large screen, Samsung did not attempt to apply coatings that would widen the viewing angles. This is where it would make the most sense, as it’s hard to expect everyone in the living room to sit perfectly in front of the screen. If someone is primarily interested in wide angles, they need to look for mini-LEDs on an IPS panel – these may not have such deep blacks, but they perform much better when viewed from the side.

The viewing angles are pretty typical for a VA panel — in other words, just average and for some probably even poor. The Bravia 3 II looks best when you’re sitting directly in front of the screen. As you move to the side, colors start to lose saturation and blacks become increasingly gray. Unfortunately, that’s the price you pay for this panel’s high native contrast. Watching with two or three people shouldn’t be much of an issue, but if the couch is wide, people sitting at its far edges will see a noticeably worse picture.

Daytime performance

7/10

5.8/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Panel brightness

SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2): 447 cd/m2

Samsung QN80F 100" : 623 cd/m2

The performance of the QN80F during the day is an interesting topic, as the 100-inch version differs from smaller sizes not only in scale but also in the coating used. Samsung opted for a different type of anti-reflective layer here, and it must be said that the effect is not as good as in the smaller models – reflections are a bit more visible, especially with strong light coming in from the window. On the other hand, the manufacturer found a way around this, as the 100-inch QN80F compensates with brightness. The average luminance in SDR content exceeds 620 nits, which practically provides a really strong reserve for viewing even in a heavily sunlit room. In everyday use, the difference between weaker reflection suppression and higher brightness is practically neutralized – the TV maintains readability and does not lose clarity even in the middle of the day. The end result is that although the coating in this version is not among the best, thanks to the high brightness, the QN80F performs better in bright conditions than one might expect.

During the day the Bravia 3 II performs quite decently, although a lot depends on where you place the TV. The satin coating handles reflections reasonably well; it doesn't act like a mirror, but strong light sources, especially a window opposite the screen, can interfere with viewing. The VA panel is an advantage here, helping blacks retain fairly good depth in daylight so the image doesn't immediately turn gray or become washed out. The set can also reach about 450 nits of brightness and can maintain that level regardless of how many bright elements are on screen. That will be more than enough for a typical living room, and during the day the picture remains easy to see. If, however, the TV is to be placed in a very bright room with large windows and a lot of direct light, you can find models with a noticeably more effective coating and greater brightness headroom.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
T-PTMFDEUC-0090-1110.7, E2500007, BT-S
6140200730
Image processor
PENTONIC 800 4GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung QN80F 100" TV Panel details
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV Panel details
Review Samsung QN80F 100" TV Panel details
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV Panel details

Samsung QN80F 100"

SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2)

TV features

7.7/10

7.9/10

  • System
    Tizen
    Google TV
  • System performance
    Very good
    Good
  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    Yes
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung QN80F 100"  TV features
Review Samsung QN80F 100"  TV features
Review Samsung QN80F 100"  TV features
Review Samsung QN80F 100"  TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

SmartTV Features: Tizen

When it comes to smart TVs, the QN80F has a lot to brag about. Samsung relies on Tizen, and it's clear that this system has been refined over the years. All the major streaming apps are available, voice search works, and AirPlay and Miracast are supported, so there are no issues streaming content from your phone or laptop. What's most interesting is that the TV can integrate other devices in the home into its ecosystem – thanks to SmartThings and support for the Matter standard, you can connect light bulbs, robot vacuums, and even devices from other brands. In practice, the QN80F becomes not just a screen for movies, but also a convenient control center for the entire apartment. Of course, it is still a closed system, so a few less popular apps might be missing, but let's face it – for 99% of users, it has everything they need and even more.

Classic Features

The traditional features on the QN80F perform quite well, although a few things are missing. On the plus side, there's PiP, or picture-in-picture – a rarely found feature that can still be very practical. Additionally, we have EPG, working teletext, and Bluetooth support, which makes it easy to pair headphones or a soundbar. On the flip side, there's no USB recording from the built-in tuners, and it lacks a remote with a classic numerical keypad. Instead, we get Samsung's characteristic small remote, which may initially seem too minimalist. However, it must be acknowledged that this unassuming gadget hides a lot of capabilities and can control other devices, such as satellite receivers, consoles, or Blu-ray players, so in practice, one remote is enough to manage the entire setup in the living room.

Smart TV Features: Google TV

The Bravia 3 II runs on Google TV and, in terms of capabilities, it’s one of the more feature-rich systems currently found in TVs. First and foremost, it offers access to a very large number of apps, so in addition to the most popular streaming platforms you’ll also find many less obvious services without much trouble. Sony also supports AirPlay and Chromecast, making it very convenient to cast content from a smartphone. Voice search also performs well, backed by Gemini, which handles commands in multiple languages and can genuinely make using the TV easier. However, during our tests we ran into one problem: the Bravia 3 II would not correctly receive a picture from a Windows 11 PC via Miracast. So if you want to use the TV as a secondary display for a computer, the safest solution is still a connection via HDMI.

Classic TV features

Sony also hasn’t forgotten users who still primarily use regular broadcast TV. The Bravia 3 II supports recording programs to USB, including the ability to schedule recordings via PVR, which is rare these days, especially in cheaper models. There is also teletext and a clear channel guide, so in terms of basic TV functions we really lacked nothing here, perhaps except for picture-in-picture (PiP). It’s notable that the set includes two remote controls. The first is modern and simplified (the non-backlit version), while the second is a classic design with a full numeric keypad. And although it may look a bit old-fashioned, viewers who watch a lot of traditional TV may actually find it more convenient, for example when entering channel numbers.

Apps

9.3/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9/10

9.3/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
No
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the QN80F performs quite decently, but it's hard to say it's fully extravagant. It handles movies quite well – it can easily play popular video formats, from simple MP4s to heavier containers. It's not at the level of all-in-one applications like VLC, but it's sufficient for everyday viewing. Especially since the last update fixed the issue with handling various subtitle formats in movies. The situation with photos is a bit worse. Support essentially ends at JPG and BMP, so if someone keeps their photo archive in another format, they have to rely on an additional application or will be forced to convert the photos.

The Bravia 3 II's built-in player works really well, and during our tests it handled most popular video and audio formats without any problems. There’s really nothing that would force us to install an extra player or use an external device. The only exception might be videos with subtitles saved in .txt format, which the TV does not support, but let’s be honest, at that point that would be nitpicking.

Sound

6.7/10

6.8/10

  • Maximum volume
    87dB
    87dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

The QN80F performs well on its own – with a slight bass, some space thanks to Dolby Atmos, and clear enough that daily watching of movies or series isn't exhausting. But with a 100-inch screen, it practically begs for a soundbar. Only then will the scale of the image and sound begin to match, as while the television does a decent job, it's hard to expect built-in speakers to fill such a large living room with sound.

In terms of sound, the Bravia 3 II performs adequately, but there’s not much more to say. The speakers handle dialogue and regular TV well, but they clearly lack lower frequencies. Bass drops off quickly, so with music, action movies, or games the sound is fairly light and lacks punch. That’s not unusual for TVs in this class, but if you want a more impactful sound a soundbar is highly recommended. Supported audio formats are much better. The Bravia 3 II handles practically everything you might need, including Dolby TrueHD, DTS-HD Master Audio, and DTS:X, formats increasingly skipped by other manufacturers. The TV can also pass them through to an external audio setup. The exception is Dolby Atmos encoded in Dolby TrueHD, which the built-in speakers cannot reproduce directly, but when using a suitable soundbar or AV receiver this shouldn’t be a significant problem.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

87dBC (Max)

75dBC

87dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy