Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D vs Panasonic W85

Direct comparison

Check the best price offer:

Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D
$747

Q70D / Q74D / Q77D

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Amazon FireTV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.8

6.1

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.1

    5.5

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.0

    5.8

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.5

    5.8

  • Gaming on console

    8.7

    7.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.0

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    5.4

    4.2

  • Utility functions

    7.4

    6.8

  • Apps

    9.3

    7.6

  • Sound quality

    6.3

    5.8

Advantages

  • Excellent performance with consoles and computers

  • Color reproduction after the calibration process

  • Very good efficiency in sports - advanced motion smoothing system

  • Smooth and trouble-free operation of the Tizen system

  • Very good quality of tonal transitions in this budget

  • VA matrix with high native contrast

  • High refresh rate 120/144 Hz

  • Two HDMI 2.1 ports supporting ALLM, VRR, and Dolby Vision in games

  • Very low input lag

  • Quite good color gamut coverage thanks to the QLED filter

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Sturdy central base

  • Great compatibility with PC – full 4:4:4 chroma, readable fonts

Disadvantages

No like
  • Possible noticeable light leaks

  • No Dolby Vision support

  • Low brightness (below 270 nits) – no real HDR

  • HDR mode in games is poorly developed, with incorrect HGiG implementation

  • Weak media file player

  • The FireTV system in Europe is poorly developed: there are micro stutters and awkward translations, and many apps are missing

  • Average sound quality, lacking depth

  • Motion smoothing doesn't want to work

Our verdict

The Samsung Q70D delivers solid performance for its price range, with standout features that will appeal to a wide range of users. Its gaming capabilities, in particular, are impressive, offering features like smooth gameplay and low input lag that make 30 fps titles feel like they’re running at 60 fps. The well-executed HGIG mode, which performs similarly to Dolby Vision, is another highlight for gamers. Additionally, the Samsung Q70D pairs easily with Canal+ decoders, a feature many other TVs struggle with.

When it comes to daytime viewing, the Samsung Q70D shines with bright SDR content that makes it ideal for well-lit rooms. However, there are a couple of downsides. The lack of Dolby Vision is noticeable, as the TV’s brightness could have benefited from it, and light leakage can be seen in dark scenes with low brightness settings. While these issues are not dealbreakers, they are worth noting.

On the plus side, the Samsung Q70D has one of the best motion smoothers in its class, making it perfect for sports or fast-action content. The system runs smoothly and has all needed apps. Overall, the Samsung Q70D is a strong addition to the manufacturer's seventh series, with consistent improvements in quality and growing popularity.

The Panasonic W85B is a TV that aims to prove that the Japanese brand can produce not only top-tier devices but also something more "for the people." And it really does look decent on paper: a VA panel with solid contrast, high refresh rates of 120/144 Hz, two full HDMI 2.1 ports, and low input lag. It sounds like a great setup for a gamer or someone just looking for an affordable TV with good fundamentals. However, the reality is a bit more complicated. The W85B performs well mainly with SDR content, especially after calibration, and will serve well for typical everyday use. But when we start expecting more from it—for example, counting on strong HDR performance or greater immersion in games with that mode activated—the TV quickly shows its limitations. Its brightness is low and the lack of local dimming becomes quite noticeable during evening viewing. Therefore, we view the W85B more as a "daily" TV—ideal for someone who watches terrestrial television, YouTube, or SDR streaming, and wants to connect a console or PC for 120/144 Hz (but without HDR). In that role, it performs very well. Is it a TV for everyone? Definitely not. But if we accept its limitations and approach it with reasonable expectations, the W85B can provide a lot of enjoyment for a relatively sensible price.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (40Gbps)
1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Average
Stand type
Central
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.4/10

5.3/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Contrast and black detail

Result

2,450:1

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Contrast and black detail

Result

6,550:1

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Contrast and black detail

Result

5,850:1

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Contrast and black detail

Result

2,800:1

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,300:1

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,250:1

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,200:1

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,400:1

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

3,150:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The Samsung Q70D and its related models, like the Q77D and Q74D, feature a VA panel, which generally provides excellent contrast. Compared to IPS/ADS screens without advanced local dimming, the contrast on these models is several times better. However, the contrast results can vary significantly due to the non-uniformity of the panel. This means that sometimes the contrast is great, but at other times it can be noticeably worse, though it tends to remain fairly consistent overall, except for light bleeding.

To illustrate this, we look at two film scenes from "Oblivion" and "Revenant." In the first scene, the lights are well-separated, which is a positive as it suggests that detailed visibility in bright areas should be good in future tests. What stands out in this frame is the sharpness of the smoke under the light and the deep navy blacks in the background. In contrast, the second scene from "Revenant" reveals uneven backlighting, which is quite noticeable and impacts the overall image quality. Despite this, the details in the movie remained clearly visible.

The W85B is Panasonic's entry-level LCD, so one shouldn't expect miracles in this category, but... the VA panel really does a great job here. Its biggest advantage is simply better contrast than in popular IPS panels – blacks often look gray there, while here you can actually see deeper tones. In the scenes we tested, the contrast held around 4000:1, which translates to roughly four times better performance than in IPS panels. Of course, there's no local dimming, so in difficult conditions, when it gets really dark in the room, black can resemble navy more than absolute pitch black. This is the difference you can see compared to OLEDs or Mini-LEDs. But in everyday viewing – a series, a match, a movie in the evening in the living room – this contrast is more than sufficient. The image has the right depth, and the W85B doesn't give the feeling of a "washed-out" television.

HDR effect quality

5.5/10

4.2/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 92.2%, Bt.2020: 68.7%
DCI P3: 95.6%, Bt.2020: 75.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Brightness measurement

Result

433 nit

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Brightness measurement

Result

461 nit

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Brightness measurement

Result

477 nit

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Brightness measurement

Result

475 nit

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Brightness measurement

Result

490 nit

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

228 nit

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

249 nit

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

283 nit

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

282 nit

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

297 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Panasonic W85

Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D

Luminance of RGB colors

The brightness of the Samsung Q70D is fairly average, yet it delivers a noticeable HDR effect. With brightness exceeding 400 nits, the distinction between SDR and HDR materials becomes evident. As observed in the discussion about contrast and black levels, the TV's performance varies across different scenes. In a scene featuring a bright sun against a darker foreground, the measured luminance is lower. However, in a scene with a large, bright light source dominating the frame, the TV achieves its peak brightness, reaching nearly 500 nits—a commendable result for its price range and display class.

Despite these strengths, the relatively low coverage of the wide DCI-P3 color gamut occasionally results in less vivid color reproduction. Even so, the TV offers rich colors and precise shade reproduction, enhancing the movie-watching experience. Furthermore, the Q70D excels in motion blur elimination during dynamic scenes, making it a solid choice for enjoying sports broadcasts and gaming.

Unfortunately, we don't have good news here. The Panasonic W85B is rather dim – its peak brightness does not exceed 300 nits, so it's hard to talk about any true HDR effect. In practice, this means that scenes which on other screens can "shine" and make an impression, here look simply like regular SDR with a slight boost in colors. Our measurements and film tests confirmed this – regardless of the content, the W85B won't extract anything more from HDR. So if someone is looking for a TV specifically for HDR, it's better to look towards other models. As a consolation, the fact remains that in terms of colors, the W85B performs quite well. It's a QLED TV, so its color gamut coverage is wide, and most films and series look natural, without a distinct "washed out" effect. The colors are saturated, so during regular viewing, there is no sense that something is quite wrong.

Factory color reproduction

6.1/10

4.2/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

The best factory mode on the Samsung Q70D is "Filmmaker," and it is the one we used when conducting various tests. Before the calibration process, it had several flaws that effectively prevented the conveyance of the director's intentions. In both SDR and HDR materials, the white balance was dominated by red and green colors. As a result, there was a characteristic yellow tint on the image, causing whites to appear yellowed and creating issues with skin tones, which were noticeably too warm. The reduced gamma in the standard color gamut materials caused a significant drop in the already low contrast. This resulted in an emphasis on details in the blacks but also in blown-out images in brighter scenes. The EOTF curve, in this case, turned out to be much better and only lightened those scenes with relatively low luminance. This was clearly visible in the section where we measured the maximum brightness of the television in HDR materials. At that time, the frame from the movie "Billy Lynn" was unnaturally bright and lacking depth.

While testing the Panasonic W85B, we of course started with the Filmmaker mode, as it is the gold standard today for watching content "as the director intended." The problem is that this TV is quite far from those intentions. The biggest issue turned out to be an excess of red – in both SDR and HDR. The picture often looked overly warm, and in some scenes, it appeared almost "blazing." Additionally, there’s the issue of brightness management. When we looked at the gamma and EOTF charts, it was clear as day that in most scenes, the TV brightens the image more than it should. The effect was easy to predict. Details can get lost, leading to flattening and clipping across the entire screen. Of course, we know how to improve this, but it must be said honestly that it requires quite a bit of work in calibration. Out of the box, the W85B does not provide a reference-level picture – it is rather a TV that will always interpret colors and brightness a bit "its own way" without professional adjustments. Unfortunately, this is to the detriment of the viewer.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.1/10

6.9/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Fortunately, Samsung provides a wide range of calibration tools in all its televisions, where we can find 2-point and 20-point grayscale adjustments as well as advanced CMS. Thanks to this, we were able to significantly improve the quality of SDR and HDR materials. The vast majority of errors have been corrected, and the image that the Samsung Q70D now generates is definitely closer to the reference. Higher deltaE errors in the high dynamic range materials are primarily due to the display's insufficient luminance.

Fortunately, calibration made a significant difference for the Panasonic W85B, especially in SDR content. Here, the improvement was really noticeable – we managed to balance the white and reasonably tame the TV's tendency to excessively brighten the entire image. The picture became more coherent, and the colors gained a naturalness that was lacking in the factory settings. Admittedly, the results from the Color Checker are not perfect, as the W85B has visible issues with green saturation, but overall, we assess the post-calibration effect in SDR very positively. The situation with HDR is a bit different. Here, we were also able to limit the tendency to warm up the entire scene, so the image turned out much better than in the factory settings. However, the same problem we mentioned earlier is still evident – the TV interprets the image too "in its own way" and brightens the entire frame. The lack of local dimming only exacerbates this effect. In summary, briefly in SDR content, the W85B performs really well after calibration and is perfectly suitable for everyday viewing. However, in HDR, even after adjustments, it is still hard to unequivocally recommend it for serious viewing sessions.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

6.9/10

9.1/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

Considering how important light play is in films and series, the overlapping structures and the fluidity of tonal transitions are an extremely significant element in assessing image quality. The color grading on the tested television is at quite a decent level. It cannot be said that it is outstanding, but it is also not bad. We rate it as acceptable. Brighter scenes perform the best here, showing the least amount of stuttering. In scenes recorded in darker settings, slight deficiencies in grading can already be noticed; however, this is not an issue that would cause discomfort while watching. This may be disrupted by the bleeding backlight, clearly visible in the last photo.

Here we can confidently praise the Panasonic W85B. The television handles color blending and tonal transitions really remarkably. Gradients look smooth, without visible bands or artificial outlines. As a result, the image gains a natural quality, and sequences with a lot of subtle shades – like the sky or blurred backgrounds – look exceptionally good for this class of equipment.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7/10

6/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The function responsible for improving gradation is named "Noise Reduction" in the menu. As we have confirmed, it is worth activating as it has a positive effect on tonal transitions. More importantly, it does not negatively affect film grain or fine details, which sometimes the competition "offers" us.

Image scaling in Samsung Q70D should be rated as average. The manufacturer aims not to artificially sharpen the image but to leave it naturally softened.

With native SDR content, the Panasonic W85B performs very well – tonal transitions are smooth and natural, without artificial bands or clear contours. However, the situation looks worse with lower resolution materials. This is where the television has the biggest problem with "beautifying" the image. The lack of any option in the menu that would allow for improving gradation means that with older films or materials from YouTube, one can sometimes notice slight issues with color blending.

Fortunately, upscaling, or increasing the quality of lower resolution content, performs much better. This is definitely a strong point of this model – the image is scaled cleanly and in detail, and the television handles this better than one might expect from such an affordable device. This is thanks to the HCX processor, which Panasonic has been developing for years, and it shows that even in the lower series, it can do a good job.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.4/10

6.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
120Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
No
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
30%
77%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur ():

Blur (4K@144Hz):

The Samsung Q70D is the first model in the manufacturer's range to feature a 120Hz panel, resulting in more advanced motion smoothing capabilities compared to lower-category models. Within the menu, three functions are dedicated to improving motion fluidity: "Motion Blur Reduction," "Judder Reduction," and "Clear Motion (LED)." The third option will be discussed separately. The first function enhances sharpness during motion, while the second adjusts the degree of smoothing. The smoothness feature on the Samsung Q70D performs well, with each setting delivering a noticeable effect. This allows viewers to customise the level of fluidity, making it suitable for those who dislike the typical stuttering of films or enjoy watching sports. The accompanying picture illustrates a configuration with mild smoothing, avoiding the soap opera effect.

The panel employed in the Samsung Q70D offers a commendable response time for its class. While it won't deliver razor-sharp motion clarity, it is a strong choice for sports enthusiasts at this price point.

At first glance, everything looks good – the Panasonic W85B has a 120 Hz panel and even a 144 Hz mode, so it seems that it should handle smooth motion well. The problem begins when we look into the settings. The options for improving fluidity are supposedly present in the menu, but in practice… they change nothing. No matter what we choose, the image looks the same. On top of that, there's a lack of BFI, which is the black frame insertion mode that helps sharpen motion in many TVs. And suddenly, it turns out that despite having a strong panel, the W85B doesn't give us any real tools to adjust that motion to our needs. It only works well when the source itself operates at a higher frequency – for example, games at 120 Hz. But when it comes to movies or sports, we just have to take what the TV shows us, because there's nothing more we can do about it.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.5/10

8.5/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 120Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The tested television, Samsung Q70D, has four HDMI 2.1 ports, all offering a bandwidth of 40 Gbps. Despite this, no negative effects were noticed during testing. More importantly, the TV supports all features associated with the HDMI 2.1 standard. This will certainly please gamers, as it ensures optimal gaming performance using a console or a PC. While HDR Dolby Vision is absent, the correct implementation of HGIG mode and the absence of any calibration checkerboard issues are noteworthy. Additionally, Samsung stands out by allowing gaming with the smoothness enhancer activated without significant performance degradation. This means that 30 fps titles are perceived similarly to those running at a native 60 frames per second.

Samsung was one of the first manufacturers to introduce the Game Bar, which has been consistently improved. It provides all necessary gameplay information and allows users to adjust "on the fly."

In summary, the Samsung Q70D performs excellently with both consoles and computers. All functions worked seamlessly, and there were no issues. The ability to activate the smoothness enhancer without a noticeable increase in input lag is a game-changing feature.

On paper, the Panasonic W85B looks really solid. Here we have two full HDMI 2.1 ports, support for ALLM, variable refresh rate, Dolby Vision in games, and of course, a high refresh rate for the panel itself. Additionally, there’s the characteristic Panasonic game bar that allows you to check key parameters with one click and quickly change them if necessary. Sounds great, but the problem arises when we activate HDR. Here, the W85B significantly falters because it lacks proper HGiG implementation – the TV manages brightness poorly, and instead of faithful image rendering, we get scenes that are too bright, sometimes even blown out. The solution? The simplest – turn off HDR in the console settings and leave everything in SDR. And here it gets really interesting, because in this scenario, the W85B shows its better side. Low input lag, high smoothness thanks to 120 Hz – all of this makes gaming look phenomenal. Yes, HDR can be sacrificed, but if responsiveness and smooth gameplay are priorities, the W85B provides a lot of fun.

Input lag

10/10

9.8/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
17 ms
1080p120
7 ms
8 ms
2160p60
13 ms
17 ms
2160p120
7 ms
8 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
17 ms
2160p120
7 ms
8 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
17 ms
2160p120 DV
10 ms

The delay performance of the Samsung Q70D is excellent, regardless of the signal or resolution. Gamers will certainly appreciate the manufacturer's efforts, as a game running in 4K at 120 Hz with HDR experiences only 7 ms of delay, which is practically imperceptible even in online games. It is also worth noting that enabling the motion smoother doubles the lag, but it still provides a very comfortable gaming experience.

There is really nothing to be afraid of here. The Panasonic W85B reacts instantly to our movements, and the values measured in tests can easily compete with gaming monitors. With a 120 Hz signal, the input lag is around 8–10 ms, and at 60 Hz it hovers around 17–20 ms. In practice, this means one thing – no delays, no frustration! You press the button, and the action happens right away on the screen.

Compatibility with PC

8/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
13ms
8ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
Max refresh rate
120Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

After connecting the Samsung Q70D to the computer and using it as a monitor, input lag is impressively low at just 13 ms, making it virtually imperceptible in the mouse-to-screen experience. Thanks to the proper implementation of chroma 4:4:4, font readability is excellent, meaning the TV can confidently serve as a monitor for text-based work.

The subpixel arrangement is BGR, which doesn’t negatively affect using the TV as a monitor. However, since most operating systems are not designed for this subpixel format, it may result in slightly less sharp contours. This is a minor issue, barely noticeable to most users.

The Panasonic W85B performs surprisingly well as a computer monitor. It's practically perfect for office work – the fonts are sharp and very readable thanks to full chroma 4:4:4 support, so it's easy to type, browse the web, or work on spreadsheets. But the real "fun" starts with gaming. The TV easily handles refresh rates up to 144 Hz for PC, and it also supports popular image synchronization technologies like NVIDIA G-Sync and AMD FreeSync. Because of this, we don't have to worry about screen tearing or micro-stutters – the gameplay is smooth and simply looks great.

Viewing angles

2.9/10

3.2/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
71%
77%

Due to the VA panel, the Samsung Q70D struggles with off-angle viewing. Even a slight shift in position leads to a noticeable drop in contrast and a significant loss of colour accuracy.

Here you can see the biggest price we pay for the high quality of the VA matrix contrast. The W85B, like most TVs with this type of panel, does not perform well when viewing from a greater angle. Colors lose intensity and the image begins to fade as soon as we move away from the screen's axis. This is not a flaw of Panasonic itself, but rather a feature of VA technology – great contrast in exchange for weaker viewing angles. So if you plan to watch movies with a larger group and often sit "to the side," keep this in mind.

Daytime performance

5.4/10

4.2/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Average
Good
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

Panasonic W85: 263 cd/m2

Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D: 449 cd/m2

The satin finish of the panel in Q70D allows for quite good performance in a heavily sunlit room. It is worth noting that reflections do not extend beyond their source, and thus do not spread over the rest of the panel. We also have good words for the maximum brightness of the TV in SDR materials, which is 450 nits, allowing for comfortable consumption of content during the day.

The Panasonic W85B has a satin finish panel that handles glare reduction and color retention quite well, even in bright light coming from windows or lamps. There is no "mirror" effect here, so watching television in a typical living room during the day is comfortable. However, the problem arises when we encounter really bright rooms – the TV does not have high brightness, so it won't cut through very strong sunlight. It's simply a screen that performs best in controlled conditions.

Panel details

Backlight Type
QLED
QLED
Software version during testing
T-NKM2DDEUC-1053.2
Fire OS 8.1.4.6 (RS8146/3057
Image processor
MT5896

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D TV Panel details
Review Panasonic W85 TV Panel details

Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D

Panasonic W85

TV features

7.4/10

6.8/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 40Gbps
    1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    Yes
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    No
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D TV features
Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D TV features
Review Panasonic W85 TV features
Review Panasonic W85 TV features
Review Panasonic W85 TV features
Review Panasonic W85 TV features

The Tizen system powers the operation of the Samsung Q70D. It is a well-known software, as the manufacturer has been developing it for its televisions for a long time. Its main advantage is smooth operation and the absence of significant stuttering, which is confirmed by our tests. However, its biggest downside is its closed nature. Although the app store is quite extensive, users are still at the mercy of the manufacturer. As a result, we cannot install missing apps, even from a pendrive. On the other hand, an advantage—especially for Apple device users—is the implementation of AirPlay functionality, which allows easy screen mirroring from the device to the television. Thankfully, Samsung has also included the option to connect a keyboard and mouse for much faster navigation through the television menu. It’s worth noting that this year, the manufacturer has included a Bluetooth remote, which often wasn’t the case.

The Tizen system has another advantage: it integrates very well with external devices, such as the NC+ decoder or soundbars. The connection process is quick and doesn't require special skills. One of the standout features of the Samsung Q70D in our tests is the speed of application operation, with apps loading almost instantly and eliminating annoying delays. Additionally, users can utilize the built-in voice assistant, simplifying navigation and content searching.

In summary, the Tizen system is very efficient software and certainly a strong advantage of the television. While more advanced users may complain about the lack of apps like KODI, the majority will be satisfied.

SmartTV: FireTV

The W85B runs on the Fire TV system and it must be admitted – this is a significant step forward compared to Panasonic's previous proprietary solutions. Here we have support for AirPlay, screen mirroring, and even voice control through Alexa. It sounds modern and in practice it actually offers quite a few possibilities. The problem is that in Europe, Fire TV still looks a bit like a "guest with luggage." It works decently, but there are occasional micro-stutters, the interface doesn’t always respond as smoothly as we would like, and you may encounter awkward translations in the menu. It’s not yet on the level of the major players like Google TV or even Tizen, but it is still an improvement over what Panasonic had before. However, the worst part of it all is that the Fire TV app library is quite modest and that is its biggest drawback.

Classic TV Features

In terms of classic television functionalities, it's quite good – we have a classic remote control with a full numeric keypad, a clear EPG guide, and the ability to record programs from the built-in tuner to an external USB drive (e.g., a flash drive). A downside is the lack of options to schedule recordings in advance – you can record "here and now," but you can't set recordings for later.

Apps

9.3/10

7.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
No
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
No
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
No
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

3.1/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
No
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in player of the Samsung Q70D is a major advantage. It handled almost all video and audio files prepared for testing excellently. The only exceptions were the Dolby Vision format (which is not surprising) and some less popular codecs. On the positive side, the player supports Polish characters and allows users to change font colours. However, its performance with photo formats is lacking, as it only supports the popular JPEG format. Other formats, such as PNG or Apple's HEIC, are notably absent.

The biggest problem with the built-in player on Fire TV is the lack of support for external subtitle files. If you have your own movie library and use text files, you simply won't be able to display them on this TV. The player itself handles basic video formats, but if someone wanted to fully utilize files from USB, they would likely end up installing an additional app from the store (e.g., VLC).

Sound

6.3/10

5.8/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    87dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Constrained by its slim design, the built-in audio system of the Samsung Q70D is not particularly remarkable. The sound is relatively balanced overall, but increasing the volume beyond 2/4 of the scale is not advisable. On the other hand, for those with a home theatre system, the TV supports a range of audio codecs, including the most essential ones: DTS-HD Master Audio and Dolby Atmos.

Here, the Panasonic W85B unfortunately has nothing to brag about. The speakers sound flat and rather "plastic," so cinematic experiences are definitely not to be had here. There is no depth, no clear bass – just basic sound that merely "exists." It's a shame because we thought the external subwoofer used here would actually make a difference. Unfortunately, we were mistaken. The only advantage is that the television can play really loudly. This might appeal to older users who often need higher volume to comfortably watch programs or news. For everyday TV viewing, it’s enough, but if someone is thinking about movies and gaming – an additional soundbar or audio system is essentially a must.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

87dBC (Max)

75dBC