Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) vs Philips PUS7000

Direct comparison

Check the best price offer:

Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED)
$1 299

S85F / FAE / FAU / S84F

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Panel type: QD-OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

8.1

5.3

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    8.4

    4.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    9.2

    5.7

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    8.9

    4.9

  • Gaming on console

    9.6

    6.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    7.6

    5.8

  • Watching in bright light

    5.1

    3.5

  • Utility functions

    7.3

    5.0

  • Apps

    9.3

    6.7

  • Sound quality

    7.2

    5.8

Advantages

  • Amazing black and contrast

  • Incredible color palette coverage thanks to the QD-OLED panel

  • Great picture in SDR and HDR content

  • High color fidelity after calibration

  • Very good image smoothness – 120 Hz OLED panel

  • Rich set of features for gamers: VRR, Game Bar, low input lag

  • 4 HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gbps

  • Advanced and smoothly operating Tizen system

  • Solar Remote with multiple capabilities

  • Attractive price

  • High contrast VA panel

  • Very low input lag

  • Gaming features – presence of VRR, ALLM, and a dedicated Game Bar

  • HDR10+ support

  • Quite decent image processing (for such a cheap TV)

  • Good readability of fonts – will work well as a large monitor

  • Backlit remote control with numeric keypad

Disadvantages

No like
  • No USB recording function and PiP

  • No Dolby Vision

  • Slight cherry black under very strong external light (not visible during viewing in cinematic conditions)

  • Very low brightness – 200 nits

  • No Ambilight

  • Lack of any features to improve fluidity makes the image very "raw"

  • Titan OS system – the interface is slow, and it lacks many popular applications

  • The remote works with infrared

Our verdict

Samsung S85F with a QD-OLED panel can be surprising – and surprisingly positively so. Before the tests, we didn't think that in the case of televisions, which are often referred to in the context of "panel lottery," one could come across something beneficial for users. Yet, in this case, especially in the 55-inch version, it fully succeeded. The QD-OLED panel, as is fitting for organic technology, offers nearly perfect black and contrast in cinematic conditions. However, the difference lies in the way colors are reproduced – here it is simply outstanding. The color gamut coverage is impressive, and after slight calibration, the colors become almost exemplary. Motion smoothness is equally high. The 120 Hz panel handles both sports and action movies exceptionally well. And if someone plans to connect a console to the S85F, they will receive a full set of advantages: low input lag, variable refresh rate, Game Bar, and full HDMI 2.1 support. In daily use, we were assisted by the Tizen system – closed, but incredibly refined. It responds quickly, offers a rich selection of applications, and features such as AirPlay and voice control make it hard to find something more complete in this category. Indeed, the S85F is not without its flaws. However, the balance of advantages and disadvantages is exceptionally favorable here. One could even get the impression that this is one of the best televisions in its price segment.

If you are looking for a specific reason to buy the Philips PUS7000, it is essentially just the price. This model is meant to be primarily inexpensive, and it fulfills that role perfectly. It could be a decent choice for someone who is still using an old Full HD screen and wants to finally switch to 4K without emptying their wallet. Interestingly, even though this is a "budget 60 Hz" model, Philips has not forgotten about gamers. We get VRR and ALLM, which significantly enhance the gaming experience when connected to a console, making everything quite responsive. But... well, the biggest problem with this TV is brightness, or rather, the lack of it. 200 nits is an output that makes the PUS7000 simply capitulate on a sunny day. The image will be pale and unclear even though it features a high-contrast VA panel. HDR here is basically just a label on the box. With such a dark panel, HDR content looks artificial and simply lacks the necessary intensity, so it’s better to forget about it and stick with regular SDR. Is it worth buying? At this price point, every manufacturer makes similar compromises, so the PUS7000 does not drastically fall behind the rest of the budget screens. The only question is whether you can get along with the Titan OS, which is still a bit raw and lacks many apps that are standard among competitors. With today’s prices, where Chinese brands like TCL and Hisense are flooding the market with QLEDs and Mini-LEDs, the Philips PUS7000 faces a really tough battle. If you care about a well-known brand logo and a low price: you can go for it. However, if you are looking for image quality… you’d better double-check your budget before purchasing.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Toslink (Optical audio)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Average
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Base adjustment
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

10/10

5.9/10

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,500:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,550:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The Samsung S85F in the 55-inch version has something exceptional – it features a QD-OLED panel. This sounds quite surprising, but that’s the fact, at least in Poland. So the question arises: is the difference from last year's S85D with a WOLED panel even noticeable? Yes, although in this particular test – black levels and contrast – it practically makes no difference.

Regardless of the scene, the S85F delivers infinite contrast and perfect black levels that we expect from any OLED. These results can amaze even the most demanding movie enthusiasts. It’s worth noting that such deep blacks can only be offered by televisions with organic panels – and it doesn’t matter whether it’s WOLED or QD-OLED. So, if you dream of a screen that can "turn off" the light in a scene as effectively as an independent cinema in a dark room, the S85F is one of those televisions.

The model PUS7000 we tested in the 55-inch size is equipped with a VA panel. This is significant for black quality, as in such budget constructions we do not find local dimming systems that could assist the screen in dark scenes. Therefore, all the work rests on the panel itself, which, thanks to its characteristics, offers a decent contrast of 6000:1. In practice, this translates to much better experiences during evening viewings compared to competing TVs with IPS panels. The black here is better separated from bright elements, making dark parts of the image not appear washed out, and details in shadows remain visible. However, it is worth noting that in completely dark conditions, the black may slightly take on shades of navy blue and will not be as perfectly "pitch black" as in more expensive models. To mitigate this effect and improve depth perception, it is advisable to consider watching the TV with soft, additional lighting in the room. Usually, this issue was somewhat resolved by the well-known Ambilight system from Philips TVs, which, through a glow on the wall, optically increases contrast. Unfortunately, in the PUS7000 model, the manufacturer decided to look for savings, so we do not find this backlighting system here, which is standard in higher series like the PUS8000.

HDR effect quality

6.2/10

3.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 100.0%, Bt.2020: 86.2%
DCI P3: 78.3%, Bt.2020: 57.1%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

666 nit

Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

703 nit

Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

742 nit

Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

732 nit

Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

433 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

197 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

209 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

230 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips PUS7000

Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED)

As an OLED, the Samsung S85F can really shine – literally. Under favorable conditions, it can generate brightness exceeding 750 nits. This is hugely significant because most movies are created with displays around 1000 nits in mind. In practice, this means that in scenes with moderately large bright elements, the image can look simply fantastic. However, it's not always so rosy. When there is a massive amount of light on the screen – whether it's a vast bright background or an entire screen filled with white – the S85F must tone it down. The brightness can drop by even four times in such scenes. This limitation is known to basically every OLED in this price range, so we don't consider it a particular failing. However, something that deserves praise is what sets this model apart from the competition – color gamut coverage. Thanks to the QD-OLED panel, our colorimeter showed values exceeding 100% DCI-P3 coverage and as high as 86% for the ultra-wide BT.2020 palette. Such results are hard to find even in televisions that cost several times more.

Unfortunately, the PUS7000 is not suitable for watching HDR content. This screen is simply too dark. A brightness level of 200 nits is not enough to correctly display such a format. Even if a HDR signal message appears on the screen, the image will resemble a regular SDR recording. Therefore, it's better to stick with the latter format to avoid issues in displaying bright scenes, which you can read about below. The situation is not improved by the fact that this is a classic LCD model without additional layers to enhance colors, such as QLED or PFS. As a result, colors in HDR may appear washed out. Ultimately, this gives a worse effect than in the standard SDR format, which is simply better suited to the capabilities of this panel.

Factory color reproduction

5.5/10

5.3/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

Samsung, as befits a manufacturer with ambitions, equipped the S85F with a mode called Filmmaker. Its task is simple: to make the colors on the newly purchased television as true to what the director wanted us to see as possible. Sounds great… but, as often happens, a great-sounding theory doesn’t always translate into perfect practice.

In the tested unit, it quickly became apparent that the image – due to an excess of blue and red – looked as if someone had overdone the saturation a bit. As a result, quite significant color errors appeared, particularly in 4K content. To make matters worse, there was a brightness issue – the S85F could brighten most scenes more than it should, taking away their intended mood.

Fortunately, Samsung televisions, including the S85F, offer an impressive number of settings for advanced calibrators. This means we could check what this panel is truly capable of when it gets into the right hands.

We tested the television in movie mode, which theoretically should provide the best and most natural colors. And indeed, this mode is quite correct; however, after connecting the calibration equipment, its biggest flaw became apparent. The PUS7000 has significant deficiencies in displaying red. Poorly tuned white balance and too low saturation of this color cause the image to appear too cool. As a result, one might get the impression that the displayed content is simply lacking in vibrant colors. The situation is exacerbated by the fact that both SDR and HDR content are excessively brightened. This is confirmed by the gamma curve and EOTF graphs, which show that the television displays the image brighter than it should. This causes scenes to lose their depth and may appear somewhat washed out. Fortunately, the Philips menu offers many functions to improve these aspects, so we immediately proceeded to calibration to see what could be squeezed out of this screen.

Color reproduction after calibration

9.3/10

7/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Thanks to the vast number of settings in the menu, we managed to bring the S85F almost to perfection. White balance in SDR content? Literally perfect – deviations do not exceed a value of "1". Thus, it can be confidently said that in materials with not very high dynamics, we have an image close to reference.

In HDR content, minor issues did arise, but they are of little significance in practice – most errors fall below the threshold of perception, which is a value of "3". We also managed to tame the S85F regarding brightness management – the EOTF curve, even in films, adheres to an almost perfect line. This is one of those cases where after calibration, you can comfortably forget about the settings and simply enjoy movies and series at the highest level.

After professional calibration, it is clear that the PUS7000 responds well to image adjustments. In this price range, this is not a given. The effects should be assessed in two scenarios, depending on what content we plan to watch. SDR performs the best. After our corrections, the image looks really good. Most color errors fell below level 3, which is the threshold at which distortions typically become visible to the naked eye in measurements. Movies, series, sports, and regular television present themselves naturally, without unpleasant deviations. If someone primarily watches classic channels or streaming in HD quality, the difference after calibration will be noticeable immediately. However, it must be made clear that the PUS7000 is still not a television suitable for sensible HDR, and calibration does not change much here. The reason lies in the hardware: colors remain too undersaturated. The television lacks solutions that expand the color gamut, such as PFS filters or a quantum dot layer, so the panel simply cannot show the intense colors required by HDR. This is most evident in reds, which still look pale. This limitation cannot be bypassed with menu settings, as it results from the design of the backlighting and the panel itself.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.5/10

6/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

Thanks to the QD-OLED panel, the color blending on the S85F performs really well. It's especially worth noting how it handles the darkest, most demanding scenes – where most televisions start to struggle, this model works almost perfectly.

Interestingly, a minor stumble can be noticed in those easier, brighter shots. There is a slight banding of colors, but it's so subtle that it's hard to believe it would actually bother anyone while watching.

In terms of color gradation in bright scenes, the PUS7000 model performs surprisingly well. It's hard to have any major complaints here. The color transitions are natural and smooth, so there are no disturbing bands or jumps between shades on a bright background. When watching cheerful scenes, nothing should distract your attention from the screen. However, the situation changes dramatically when darker shades of gray or simply very dark colors appear on the screen. Unfortunately, you can then see quite strong "stepping" of colors. Instead of smooth transitions, you get clear cuts between individual tones. In dark, atmospheric films, this can be quite annoying and distract from the viewing experience, as the tonal transitions are not as clean as in the bright parts of the image.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

6.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The tone transition smoothing feature in the S85F works really well – it can completely eliminate the problem of visible bands in very poor quality materials, even from YouTube. Unfortunately, even the lowest level of this option comes with compromises. Noise reduction is aggressive enough that it can smooth out film grain, which many of us consider an element of the cinematic atmosphere. At the "Standard" level, we did not notice that this feature removed anything significant from the image, so we can recommend this setting. On the other hand, the "High" level is a different story – it can smooth not only noise but also fine, desirable details such as the texture of objects.

When it comes to image scaling, the S85F performs very well. The material looks sharp, and the only minor imperfection is slightly visible contour jaggedness. And there’s the ongoing issue with Samsung televisions – overscan. This can cause some scenes to have their frames slightly trimmed, which is worth keeping in mind when watching very old content.

The PUS7000 handles digital image processing quite well. The distortion reduction feature deserves praise, as it effectively smooths out unwanted tonal transitions even at a low setting. However, it has a flaw: if the action is too aggressive, it can introduce undesirable artifacts on the screen. It’s a good idea to experiment with this setting to find the sweet spot between a smooth image and detail clarity.

The upscaling, which is the enhancement of lower quality materials to 4K, is adequate. The image after processing is very "soft," which is typical for almost all Philips televisions. The edges are plastic and smooth, making the image look cohesive. If someone finds it too soft, it can always be adjusted with the sharpness slider in the menu to achieve a more pronounced effect.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.5/10

3.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
120Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
No
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
47%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@60Hz Game Motion Plus):

Blur ():

S85F is a hellishly fast television – and this is not just an empty catchphrase for effect. Thanks to the 120 Hz OLED panel, dynamic scenes, whether in games or while watching a live match, look exactly as they should – smoothly, sharply, and without the feeling that something is "escaping" from the frame. The lightning-fast pixel response time, typical of OLEDs, plays a crucial role here. Transitions between frames are practically instantaneous, and the image remains clear even during the fastest camera movements. A ball flying across half the field? A car racing in a chase scene? Everything here is clear and free of the characteristic "trail" found in LCDs.

This is exactly what we expect from a good OLED – zero compromises in motion fluidity. The S85F gives the feeling that regardless of the pace of the action, we can focus on what is happening on the screen, rather than on the imperfections of the image.

In this regard, we don't really have any good news. It might seem that the biggest downside is the lack of a 120 Hz panel, but in this price range, that's actually standard, and it's hard to expect more. However, the worst part is that the TV does not have any motion smoothing features. There are no supporting systems for either movies or sports. We have to accept that the image on the PUS7000 is processed "raw." This means that during dynamic scenes or fast camera movements, the motion may appear choppy or unclear. We have no way to enable any smoother that would soften this effect.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.6/10

4.7/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 120Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

[UPDATE] We have updated our 2025 Samsung TV reviews following the release of firmware version 1131, which officially restores the essential HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) support.

The S85F has practically everything it needs to become the dream screen for gaming. Four fully-fledged HDMI 2.1 ports with a bandwidth of 48 Gb/s, support for VRR, ALLM, a super-detailed Game Bar that clearly shows all parameters – and on top of that, a gem in the form of Game Motion Plus. This is a motion interpolator that makes animation in games more enjoyable, with only a slight increase in input lag. This is a rare combination, and Samsung deserves a big plus for it. Now comes the moment where we have to complain a bit. The lack of Dolby Vision in Samsung TVs is already standard, so there's no point in hoping (unless something changes in a few years) – but the disappearance of HGiG after the software update is something that’s hard to explain. HGiG (which stands for HDR Gaming Interest Group) is a mode that allows for precise reproduction of brightness in HDR games, according to the creators' intention. Without it, HDR calibration on the console becomes less precise, so we might end up with an image that's too dark in the shadows or overly bright. Perhaps Samsung will fix this in the next update – and we have high hopes for that. Because if HGiG returns, the S85F will become almost the perfect TV for gamers.

Although the PUS7000 is not marketed as a gaming TV, it does not perform as poorly in this category as one might expect. While there is no support for 120 Hz refresh rates, which is understandable at this price point, the manufacturer has included several important features that genuinely improve the comfort of playing on a console. The most significant of these are VRR and ALLM technologies. VRR is responsible for synchronizing the screen with the number of frames generated by the console. This prevents the image from "tearing" and keeps it consistent even during sudden frame drops in the game. In turn, ALLM is a solution that automatically switches the TV to the lowest latency mode right after detecting a signal from the console. All of these parameters are easily accessible thanks to the Game Bar feature. This is a special control panel for gamers that can be brought up on the screen at any time. It allows for a quick overview of current settings and connection status without interrupting gameplay, which is a very convenient solution.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
10 ms
12 ms
1080p120
5 ms
2160p60
10 ms
12 ms
2160p120
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
10 ms
13 ms
2160p120
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

Here, dear gamers, the S85F shows its claws. 5 ms with 120 Hz content and about 10 ms with 60 Hz are results that can be described in one word in the world of televisions – phenomenal. This means that the response to our movements is practically instantaneous. We press the button, and the action on the screen happens without any delay, as if the television were reading our minds. In dynamic games, where a fraction of a second can determine victory or defeat, such values make a huge difference. There is no question of a nervous "wait" for the image to catch up with our movements. The S85F gives us the feeling that everything is under our complete control – and that's how it should be with equipment that aspires to be the ideal screen for gamers.

Another plus for gamers is the very low input lag at around 12 ms. In this price range, the result is impressive. The delay is small enough that the response to controller movements feels instantaneous, and in practice, it's hard to notice at all. Gaming remains comfortable even in fast, dynamic titles where every millisecond counts. In this regard, the PUS7000 can keep pace with much more expensive televisions.

Compatibility with PC

7.6/10

5.8/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
5ms
12ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RGB
BGR
Max refresh rate
120Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

If you plan to connect the S85F to a computer, we have good news – this television is perfect for that. Low input lag and a 120 Hz panel make gaming on a PC pure pleasure. Whether we're talking about dynamic shooters or calmer RPGs, the response is instantaneous, and the fluidity of animations can keep you engaged for hours.

Of course, there’s no rose without thorns. Due to the diamond pixel arrangement in the QD-OLED panel, there is a slight “rainbow icon” effect, particularly noticeable when sitting close to the screen. Fortunately, this is more of a detail that most of you won’t mind in everyday use. Especially since, thanks to the proper implementation of chroma 4:4:4, the readability of fonts is at a very good level – documents, websites, and text editors look just as they should.

When it comes to connecting a computer, the gaming options are quite limited. The screen supports a maximum of 60 Hz and does not offer G-Sync technology, so it is not equipment for demanding PC gamers. However, the PUS7000 surprisingly performs well for text work. The readability of the fonts is at a very high level. The TV correctly handles chrominance sampling at 4:4:4. This means that every letter, regardless of its size or color, is displayed sharp and without any distortion at the edges. As a result, office work or browsing the internet on this screen is simply comfortable and does not strain the eyes like some cheap panels that have trouble with clean font rendering.

Viewing angles

9.8/10

3.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
11%
70%

Here, dear readers, the S85F reaches absolute heights. The viewing angles are phenomenal – some of the best you can get in a television today, thanks to the unique QD-OLED panel from Samsung Display. Of course, WOLED panels can also maintain a high standard in this regard, but let's not kid ourselves – what QD-OLED shows in the S85F is even more impressive. Colors, contrast, and brightness remain practically unchanged even when watching the screen from a very large angle. This is the kind of television where you don't have to fight for the "best spot on the couch" – everyone will see the picture in all its glory, no matter where they sit.

The viewing angles in this model are poor, which results directly from the use of a VA-type panel. Although this panel provides decent contrast, as I mentioned earlier, it has one major drawback: it requires sitting directly in front of the screen. Just slightly shifting to the side is enough for the colors to start losing saturation, and the picture becomes noticeably worse.

Daytime performance

5.1/10

3.5/10

Panel finish
Glare
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Average
Good

Panel brightness

Philips PUS7000: 202 cd/m2

Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED): 317 cd/m2

We really liked the saying "there's no rose without thorns," and it perfectly fits the QD-OLED TVs. Especially when we take a look at their performance in heavily sunlit conditions. As you may notice, in very bright light, the panel's surface can take on a slightly cherry hue. The effect is subtle in the case of the S85F, but in extreme lighting conditions, black can perform a bit worse than in WOLED panels. But - and this "but" is key here - QD-OLED significantly better suppresses direct reflections of light. This means that reflections will be less bothersome, and the image will maintain clarity even when something bright reflects off the screen. You gain some, you lose some.

When it comes to brightness, the S85F is a moderately bright OLED. It's not a model made for extremely sunlit living rooms. If you plan to place it in a very bright room, we recommend considering shades or positioning it in a place that provides at least some protection from direct light.

In a sunny room, the PUS7000 performs poorly. This is all because the panel is simply dim. A brightness level of 200 nits is a very low score that does not allow for comfortable viewing in bright daylight. On the positive side, the satin screen coating does quite well in reducing reflections. Thanks to it, the panel does not display reflections as prominently, but this is not enough to save the situation. The brightness of this model is too low to cut through strong sunlight, so in very bright rooms, the image will simply be unclear.

Panel details

Backlight Type
White LED
Software version during testing
T-PTMFDEUC-0090-1110.7
TPN256E_V056.002.236.141
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) TV Panel details
Review Philips PUS7000 TV Panel details

Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED)

Philips PUS7000

TV features

7.3/10

5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Other inputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) TV features
Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) TV features
Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) TV features
Review Samsung OLED S85F / S84F (QD-OLED) TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features

Features of the Classic S85F TV

The S85F was not really designed with fans of classic television in mind. We won’t find PiP functionality here (which is a bit surprising, because Samsung usually offers it) nor the ability to record programs to USB from the built-in tuners. Fortunately, the basics are present – teletext and a clear channel guide – so this is more than enough for regular, everyday viewing. The included remote, although simple at first glance and lacking a numeric keypad, allows for the control of multiple devices. This means that when connecting, for example, a Canal+ decoder, you don’t need to have two remotes on the table – the one from the television is sufficient.

SmartTV S85F: Tizen

The smart part is a completely different story. Tizen is one of the most advanced operating systems in televisions. It works efficiently, supports all popular internet functions – from screen mirroring, through AirPlay, to voice search. The strongest aspect of Tizen is its integration with the SmartThings app, which can act as a control center for the entire home. Of course, like any closed system, Tizen has its limitations – for instance, a smaller application library compared to GoogleTV. However, looking at the current list of available applications, it’s hard to pinpoint anything that might actually be lacking.

Titan OS System

Titan OS is still a fairly new operating system, and unfortunately, this is evident in daily use. Overall, it operates sluggishly, sometimes even clumsily. The response to commands from the remote is slow, which is further complicated by the fact that the device uses infrared connectivity instead of Bluetooth / RF. This means that we have to aim the remote quite precisely at the television for the system to respond at all. During testing, the screen mirroring feature with computers equipped with Windows failed to work again. Fortunately, streaming from Apple devices using AirPlay went smoothly. Another drawback of Titan OS is the very modest app library. The selection is much smaller than in systems like webOS or Tizen, not to mention Google TV, where the choice of programs is almost unlimited.

Classic Features

On the other hand, the PUS7000 might be a good choice for people who mainly watch traditional television. Here we find a properly functioning teletext and a clear EPG interface, which is the electronic program guide. The remote included in the package is backlit, which greatly facilitates operation after dark, and it has standard numeric buttons for quick channel selection. Interestingly, there is a classic headphone jack input. This is a rarely seen addition in new televisions, allowing for the connection of older home theater systems or wired headphones without the need for additional adapters.

Apps

9.3/10

6.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the S85F performs excellently – almost everything you plug into a USB drive or disk will be played back without any issues. Minor gaps occur only with the support for some less common photo formats, but for the vast majority of you, this will be more than sufficient. So it can be confidently said that for home use, the built-in player is more than solid.

The built-in media player works quite well and handles most popular video formats without major issues. The TV easily reads subtitles from files and manages various audio formats, so those who keep movies on a disk or USB drive should not feel limited. The only complaint pertains to the photo browser - not everything worked correctly, and some files, especially at certain resolutions, would not open at all.

Sound

7.2/10

5.8/10

  • Maximum volume
    80dB
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

Built-in speakers with a power of 20 W on paper may not make a big impression, but in practice, the S85F can surprise. It sounds really pleasant, and at times, you can even catch a hint of bass, which is not a given in this class of speakers. The television does not support the DTS format, which unfortunately has become the standard for most manufacturers by 2025. A nice surprise, however, is the support for Dolby Atmos. Of course, talking about "spatial" sound in the case of two speakers placed at the bottom of the casing would be a bit of an exaggeration, but it's good that Samsung offers such a feature in this model at all.

The sound is already at a typical budget level. It is sufficient for news and public affairs programs, but when it comes to movies and music, it quickly lacks depth and bass. At this price range, it's hard to expect something more, so if we care about better experiences, it’s worth considering a soundbar or connecting external audio, even through the headphone output.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

80dBC (Max)

75dBC

81dBC (Max)

75dBC