Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D vs LG QNED93A / QNED90A

Direct compare

Check the best price offer:

Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D
$1 197

Neo QLED / QN85D / QNX1D

Info

QNED93A / QNED90A

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.4

7.3

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.7

    6.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.8

    6.9

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.7

    6.9

  • Gaming on console

    8.9

    8.6

  • TV as a computer monitor

    7.6

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    7.3

    6.2

  • Utility functions

    7.4

    8.2

  • Apps

    8.7

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    7.0

    6.9

Advantages

  • Nice Contrast with Mini LED Backlight

  • Ideal for gamers - 120hz, 4xHDMI 2.1, low input lag

  • Tizen operating system with SmartThings and AirPlay support – wide integration and flexibility

  • High brightness 825 cd/m² – Performs well in bright rooms

  • Pleasant sound with noticeable bass

  • Quite good contrast

  • High number of dimming zones

  • Good HDR brightness (about 1400 nits)

  • Wide color gamut coverage (about 96% DCI-P3)

  • 144 Hz mode and a full set of gaming features (HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, G-Sync, FreeSync, HGiG, Game Bar)

  • Low input lag (7 ms at 120 Hz)

  • Good compatibility with PC, including 144 Hz and readable fonts

  • WebOS with a rich selection of apps and voice control

  • Magic Remote

  • Quite effective upscaling and image processing tools - great for older content like antenna TV or YouTube

Disadvantages

No like
  • Lack of recording function

  • Limited support for multimedia formats, no DTS audio format

  • Local dimming algorithms need refinement

  • Very average viewing angles

  • Dolby Vision does not bring a noticeable improvement over HDR10

Our verdict

The Samsung QN85D is the entry-level model in Samsung's 2024 Mini LED – Neo QLED lineup, offering a well-balanced mix of modern smart features and impressive picture quality. Running on the Tizen platform, the QN85D provides extensive support for Samsung's SmartThings ecosystem, enabling seamless integration with other smart devices in the home, regardless of brand. Apple users benefit from AirPlay compatibility, making content sharing from Apple devices straightforward, while the Daily+ feature adds an extra layer of engagement by delivering daily curated content, enhancing everyday use.

For regular viewing, the QN85D performs commendably. Its high brightness level allows it to easily handle well-lit rooms, and the central stand offers stability and aesthetic appeal. Though it lacks a recording function, the QN85D includes several practical features, such as a solar-powered remote that also controls Canal+ decoders, along with Picture-in-Picture (PiP) mode, enhancing versatility in various viewing situations.

When it comes to picture quality, the QN85D excels in contrast and brightness. Its VA panel delivers deep blacks when viewed directly, and the Mini LED technology provides improved backlight control (with some limitations), which is particularly effective in dark scenes. A refresh rate of 120 Hz ensures smooth handling of fast-paced scenes, while low input lag makes the QN85D an excellent choice for gamers and sports fans alike.

Overall, the Samsung QN85D stands out in 2024 as a robust, feature-rich TV with high picture quality and advanced smart capabilities, making it ideal for both everyday viewing and more demanding movie or gaming sessions.

LG QNED93A is a television that, at first glance, appears to be a solid step forward compared to previous LCD models from this brand. On paper, we get a lot: a significantly larger number of dimming zones, a 144 Hz refresh rate for gamers, support for all HDR formats, including Dolby Vision, and WebOS with a new Magic remote, which still ranks among the most user-friendly operating systems. The QNED93A shines the most in gaming applications. Four fully functional HDMI 2.1 ports allow you to connect consoles and computers without any limitations, and the low input lag is maintained at both 120 and 60 Hz. For PC gamers, an additional advantage is the 144 Hz mode and full compatibility with G-Sync and FreeSync. So, it can be confidently said that in terms of gaming features, the QNED93A does not have any complexes compared to the competition. Another strong point is WebOS. LG's system has long been regarded as one of the most convenient for everyday use, and this is confirmed here. Everything is clear, and the Magic remote allows you to control the television like a mouse pointer – quickly and intuitively. Brightness can also be considered a plus. At its peak, it manages to achieve results close to 1400 nits. This is enough to ensure the picture doesn't fade in brighter rooms and that special effects in movies or games look convincing. The image processor does a good job of upscaling older content – television or films in lower resolutions appear clearer and sharper than on many competing screens.

However, it cannot be denied that the biggest problem with the QNED93A is the local dimming algorithms. In scenes full of black, the screen can darken significantly, causing many details to simply disappear. The effect is such that contrast looks better at first glance but comes at the expense of information that should be visible. An additional problem is the Dolby Vision mode, which typically enhances certain aspects of screens, but in this case, changes very little. The differences between dynamic and static metadata must literally be searched for with a magnifying glass. This is simply disappointing because the hardware, with its number of dimming zones and stronger backlighting, has the foundation for a better effect. So who is the LG QNED93A for? It is a television that works brilliantly as a home entertainment center, especially if you're thinking about gaming on a console or PC. In everyday television viewing and movie watching in well-lit conditions, it also provides a lot of satisfaction thanks to its high brightness and solid image processor. However, one must accept that in scenes with a lot of black and when fully utilizing HDR, this model does not match its competitors. LG has shown that it can create a very solid LCD screen, but it is also evident that not everything has been polished as it has in their OLED televisions.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Good
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Central
Central
Bezel colour
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.6/10

7.3/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 120 (12 x 10)

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 308 (14 x 22)

Contrast:

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D Contrast and black detail

Result

107,750:1

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D Contrast and black detail

Result

27,100:1

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D Contrast and black detail

Result

62,500:1

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D Contrast and black detail

Result

8,750:1

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D Contrast and black detail

Result

4,950:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

130,500:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

30,950:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

15,250:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

6,750:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,600:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D Contrast and black detail
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

The 2024 Samsung QN85D stands out as the first model in the Neo QLED series to use a VA panel, allowing for significantly better blacks than the IPS/ADS alternatives. For the 55-inch version, the TV is equipped with 160 dimming zones. While this is fewer than some competing models, particularly those from Chinese brands, the number increases with larger screen sizes, enhancing contrast further.

However, the limited number of dimming zones can present challenges. When displaying smaller bright elements on a dark background, the TV may either keep the brightness high—resulting in a halo effect around objects—or dim the image too much, which is evident in specific test scenes like the Pioneer disc. In more contrast-intensive scenes, such as Oblivion, the TV showcases impressive depth in blacks, though it sometimes struggles with precise light separation, attempting to maintain black levels while sacrificing some detail in brighter areas. These trade-offs affect overall perceived contrast, particularly in demanding viewing conditions.

Despite these limitations, the QN85D’s performance in contrast remains strong for its category, especially compared to TVs without local dimming, where the results are generally more impressive than anticipated.

We took a close look at the 55-inch version of the LG QNED93A, equipped with a high-contrast VA panel. However, in the case of Mini-LED TVs, it's not just the panel itself, but primarily the number and operation of local dimming zones that determine the final effect. In this model, we counted as many as 308 zones, which already looks impressive from the start. For comparison – last year's QNED91T in the 65-inch variant had only around 160. The difference is enormous and shows that LG has made a significant step forward in this technology. On paper, it looks great, but practice quickly dampens the enthusiasm. The contrast in the QNED93A can indeed impress – bright elements are clearly separated from black, and in many scenes, the depth effect truly pleases the eye. The problem is that despite such a significant improvement in backlight construction, the results are not much better than in last year's model. The algorithms controlling dimming can be too aggressive. This is especially noticeable in darker sequences, where the screen dims to such an extent that subtle details disappear from view. Many viewers will appreciate the stronger black, but it is hard to ignore that this comes at the expense of the director's intentions. The most problematic are scenes with many small, bright elements. It is during these moments that typical halo effects, or glowing outlines, associated with LCDs featuring local dimming zones appear around them. This phenomenon does not completely ruin the experience, but it serves as a reminder that even with an increased number of zones, local dimming still has its limitations. Ultimately, the contrast in the QNED93A can be considered good, but we have the impression that the manufacturer did not pay enough attention to optimizing the new model when it comes to black and contrast.

HDR effect quality

5.6/10

5.8/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 94.6%, Bt.2020: 77.5%
DCI P3: 95.1%, Bt.2020: 77.1%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D Brightness measurement

Result

999 nit

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D Brightness measurement

Result

335 nit

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D Brightness measurement

Result

562 nit

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D Brightness measurement

Result

182 nit

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D Brightness measurement

Result

855 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

1330 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

219 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

678 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

160 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

1016 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D HDR effect quality
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D HDR effect quality
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D HDR effect quality
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A HDR effect quality

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D HDR effect quality
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

LG QNED93A / QNED90A

HDR luminance

Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D

HDR luminance

The HDR performance of the Samsung QN85D is a mixed bag. While it excels in synthetic luminance tests, reaching up to 1000 nits, and delivers impressive results in scenes with full-screen brightness – like in The Meg or the opening of Life of Pi – the limitations become apparent when smaller bright elements are introduced. In these cases, the brightness level noticeably dips, weakening the HDR effect and reducing its impact. When brightness hovers around 200-300 nits, the immersive “wow factor” of HDR tends to diminish, and visuals lose some of their intended brilliance.

That said, the QN85D still manages to deliver decent colour quality, covering 95% of the DCI-P3 colour space, which, while respectable, doesn’t set it apart from its top competitors. Colours appear accurate and vibrant, but the HDR experience could be more compelling if the brightness was consistently well-balanced across various content types.

Although the number of local dimming zones in the LG QNED93A did not directly translate to a noticeably better contrast, one cannot deny that this model is brighter than its predecessor. In synthetic tests, we recorded values around 1400-1500 nits, and more importantly, these results are reflected in real movie scenes. In full-screen sequences flooded with white or bright lights, the screen was able to maintain high luminance, which produced a truly decent incredible HDR effect. Unfortunately, where the television could show its true class, namely in scenes that require precision, all the magic evaporates. The dimming algorithms we mentioned earlier are aggressive enough that small bright objects—such as distant lights, stars, or the moon—can almost completely disappear. Just look at the test scenes from the movie Pan or Sicario 2 (screens 2 and 4) to see how subtle details are dimmed to the brink of visibility. It's a shame, because a greater number of zones could theoretically lead to significantly better results. Fortunately, there are also stronger points. The QNED93A performs well in terms of color gamut coverage, achieving around 96% of the DCI-P3 standard. As a result, colors in movies look vivid and full, and the picture does not lose intensity even in more demanding scenes. So it can be said that the HDR in this model is solid, although the unfinished local dimming algorithms hinder its full potential.

Factory color reproduction

6.3/10

6/10

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D Factory color reproduction
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D Factory color reproduction
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

The Samsung QN85D, when tested in Filmmaker Mode, falls short of expectations for film accuracy due to several notable issues in colour and brightness reproduction. In HD content, the white balance is skewed by an excess of red and blue, causing a pinkish tint across the image. This effect, confirmed by Colour Checker tests, impacts the realism of skin tones and other details, becoming particularly distracting in complex scenes.

For 4K HDR content, while the white balance intially appears accurate, there is a pronounced shift towards blue tones at the upper end of the spectrum. This deviation results in colours that lack natural appeal, subtly detracting from the viewing experience. The gamma, although close to the standard reference, slightly dips below the ideal 2.4 level, reducing shadow depth. Moreover, the EOTF curve for 4K content is noticeably elevated above the reference line, leading to excessive brightness in certain image areas. This undermines the cinematic look Filmmaker Mode aims to deliver, creating a visual experience that feels over-bright rather than authentically nuanced.

In summary, while Filmmaker Mode on the QN85D initially presents a cinematic effect, the inaccuracies in colour balance and brightness are too significant to achieve the true-to-source quality that the mode promises.

In movie mode (specifically Filmmaker), color reproduction on the QNED93A was relatively accurate, although it wasn't without critiques. In SDR content, white balance leaned towards warmer tones, resulting in a slight yellowing across the entire screen. Gamma, on the other hand, led to a slight brightening of the image, making it look a bit less natural, especially in scenes requiring precise shading (this is evident in the comparison picture). This isn't a problem that immediately stands out to every viewer, but more discerning individuals may feel that the picture deviates from the aesthetic intended by the filmmakers. In HDR materials, the situation looked somewhat different. The white balance presented itself quite well here, ensuring that whites didn't lean towards pink or unwanted shades of green. However, brightness management proved to be an issue. Analysis of the EOTF curve revealed that at certain moments the television can be noticeably too dark where it shouldn't be, losing some detail and reducing the realism of scenes. This detracted from the experience of HDR effects, which were theoretically supposed to be the most impressive. For this reason, we decided to carry out calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.9/10

7.8/10

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D Color reproduction after calibration
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Color reproduction after calibration
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D Color reproduction after calibration
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Color reproduction after calibration

After professional calibration of the Samsung QN85D’s Filmmaker Mode, there's a noticeable enhancement in HD/SDR content quality. The calibration eliminates major issues with white balance, and adjustments to the brightness characteristics result in a more natural and lifelike picture. Regular HD content, like television broadcasts and YouTube videos, now benefits from well-balanced colours, free from the distracting hues that previously impacted image quality.

However, challenges remain with 4K HDR content. Despite calibration, improvements in white balance for HDR are minor, and more cosmetic than transformative. The EOTF curve initially aligns with reference standards in test conditions, but the television struggles to maintain consistent brightness during film scenes. As a result, dark elements appear overly boosted in mixed scenes, creating excessive contrast. In fully dark scenes, the image often becomes too dim, obscuring finer details and diminishing the overall viewing experience. This inconsistency in brightness affects the depth and accuracy of HDR performance, especially in more challenging scenes.

After professional calibration, the Filmmaker mode on the QNED93A gained the most where it matters most in everyday use. It was possible to adjust the white balance and eliminate the yellowish tint in SDR content, which we watch most often – television, streaming services, or standard quality films. This makes colors look natural and pleasant, and the overall experience is much more comfortable. In HDR mode, we also made adjustments, but the biggest problem here turned out to be the EOTF curve. Although LG provides some leeway in the settings, the television still manages brightness on its own terms. It is evident that the local dimming algorithms are not entirely refined and can spoil the viewing experience by dimming parts of the image at inappropriate moments. Nonetheless, it is worth opting for calibration of this model, especially the mode intended for daily viewing.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.6/10

8/10

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Smoothness of tonal transitions

When it comes to the smoothness of tonal transitions on the Samsung QN85D, it is generally very good. The tonal transitions are smooth, with no significant artefacts. However, more discerning users may notice some minor issues in certain scenes. For example, when blending darker colours, such as in the scene with the red sea, subtle imperfections can be observed. Similarly, with bright colours – the scene from the movie The Martian displays slight gradation issues, resulting in subtle but noticeable transitions between shades. Despite these minor drawbacks, most users will likely be satisfied. The overall performance remains high and in most cases, it delivers smooth, natural transitions between colours.

The fluidity of tonal transitions in the LG QNED93A is really good. In most scenes, there are no artificial color divisions or banding effects. Dark shots are particularly surprising – this is where many TVs struggle, but here the image remains smooth and cohesive. In brighter sections, subtle color transitions can be observed, but they are not pronounced enough to draw significant attention. During testing, we encountered a clear issue with the DSE effect, also known as the "dirty screen" effect. On our unit, the phenomenon was strong enough that in bright scenes, the corners noticeably darkened, giving the image a vignetted appearance. This could be a flaw of the test unit, but during intense viewing, it was hard to ignore.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7/10

7.8/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

When assessing the fluidity of tonal transitions in low-resolution materials on the Samsung QN85D, it's important to consider the noise reduction feature, which significantly improves problematic tonal transitions. However, this feature also has its drawbacks – it removes film grain, a crucial element in many productions that adds authenticity, and it can also soften the image. While this may appeal to those who prefer a smoother image, film enthusiasts who favour the authentic look of films may want to use this feature sparingly.

In terms of image scaling, the television performs very well. The model's figure is presented correctly, without noticeable distortions, and the branches in the background do not suffer from excessive artificial sharpness, a common issue when scaling lower-resolution content. The high capabilities of the image processor are evident, as it effectively handles lower-quality materials, ensuring a high-quality final image.

LG QNED93A proves to be a very solid television for everyday use. Its image processor handles scaling excellently, ensuring that even older movies or terrestrial television gain sharpness and detail. During the screening of "The Godfather," it's clearly visible how upscaling pulls extra details from the image – the characters' faces and the texture of the clothing appear much clearer than in the original material.

The digital image processing also deserves praise. The television is equipped with a function for reducing unwanted color banding and screen irregularities. It works best in the "Medium" setting – subtly smoothing tonal transitions without over-interfering with the image. This way, the natural film grain is preserved, and the screen doesn't appear unnaturally smoothed. Perhaps in some scenes, you can still notice slight color banding, but in practice, the effect is more favorable than with a stronger intervention from the algorithm.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.5/10

7.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
120Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
No
-
Brightness drop with BFI
75%
56%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Image flickers in this mode

Smużenie ():

Smużenie (4K@144Hz):

The Samsung QN85D’s display boasts a 120 Hz refresh rate, which should satisfy both gamers and sports enthusiasts, providing a smooth and dynamic viewing experience. There are options for further improving fluidity, including a blur and judder reduction feature that allows precise adjustment of motion smoothness on a 10-point scale. Blur reduction enhances the sharpness of fast-moving objects, making action scenes clearer, while judder reduction smooths motion to eliminate the "stuttering" effect. Ghosting is generally well-controlled, although minor drawbacks may be noticeable in more demanding scenes, particularly when an object moves against a dark background. Additionally, the television features a BFI (Black Frame Insertion) option at a 60 Hz frequency, which can significantly enhance motion smoothness, although it comes with the potential downside of flicker, which may be bothersome for some viewers.

LG QNED93A is equipped with a 144 Hz panel. This is primarily a nod to gamers, but the fact that higher refresh rates are increasingly making their way into televisions can be seen as a positive development. In everyday viewing, 120 Hz remains key, and in this regard, the QNED93A performs well. The manufacturer also provides the option to adjust the image through the TruMotion system – the De-Judder and De-Blur sliders allow you to choose between a cinematic motion character with visible frames and a fully smoothed theatrical motion.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.5/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 120Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The Samsung QN85D is an excellent choice for gamers, offering a wide range of features that elevate gameplay quality and make it even more immersive. With a 120 Hz refresh rate, the image remains incredibly smooth, crucial during fast-paced action scenes in games. The TV also boasts low input lag, making player responses to commands almost instantaneous, enhancing control over characters and events on screen. Additionally, the Samsung QN85D supports VRR (variable refresh rate) and ALLM (auto low latency mode) technologies, optimising image fluidity and reducing lag by automatically adjusting the TV to meet gamers' needs.

The Xbox app, which enables cloud gaming without requiring a console, is another significant advantage, offering a seamless gaming experience without the need for additional hardware – a feature that sets Samsung TVs apart. The Auto Motion Plus Game feature is another notable addition. This motion smoother simulates a higher frame rate, making 30 fps games appear smoother, akin to 45 fps, while games at 60 Hz are upgraded to a 90 Hz experience. Most importantly, this feature does not introduce significant lag, ensuring the comfort of gameplay remains intact. It allows gamers to enjoy a smoother image without compromising responsiveness.

LG QNED93A is a television that has undoubtedly been designed with gamers in mind. Right from the start, we get a complete package – all four HDMI ports operate at standard 2.1, so whether we connect a console, PC, or receiver, we can be sure of full compatibility. This is important because many manufacturers still limit themselves to two ports, and here nothing prevents all equipment from having maximum capabilities. There’s also an automatic game mode (ALLM), which switches the television to the appropriate settings when the console starts up, as well as variable refresh rate (VRR). This ensures that the image does not stutter or tear, even when the frame rate drops – whether in dynamic shooters or during races.

The 144 Hz panel gives an additional advantage in computer games. While 120 Hz is sufficient for consoles, in the case of PCs, the QNED93A allows for even more – every movement, every glance to the side is refreshed faster, which makes a difference especially in e-sports. The manufacturer also considered HDR in games – the television supports the HGiG mode, which provides guidelines to ensure that the lighting effects are exactly as intended by the game developers. For dessert, we get Game Bar – a special informational strip invoked on the screen that shows parameters in real-time. You can check the frame rate, active VRR functions, or input lag levels. This solution is useful not only for settings enthusiasts, but for anyone who wants to quickly verify what mode the television is operating in and whether everything is working as it should.

Input lag

9.9/10

9.8/10

SDR

1080p60
14 ms
16 ms
1080p120
10 ms
7 ms
2160p60
14 ms
16 ms
2160p120
10 ms
7 ms

HDR

2160p60
14 ms
15 ms
2160p120
10 ms
7 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
21 ms
2160p120 DV
7 ms

The Samsung QN85D impresses in terms of input lag value. The TV achieves remarkable results – below 15 ms for 60 Hz content and around 10 ms for 120 Hz content. This allows gamers to enjoy instantaneous reactions to their actions, especially in dynamic games where every millisecond counts. Such low input lag makes gameplay more responsive and natural, enhancing the overall gaming experience.

In the latency field, the LG QNED93A has nothing to be ashamed of. The TV responds instantly to our actions, which is evident from the first tests with the controller in hand. In 120 Hz mode, the input lag drops to around 7 ms, meaning nearly instant response – shots, passes, and precise movements of the stick immediately translate to the screen. For 60 Hz content, the result slightly increases to just under 15 ms, but it still remains within the full comfort zone. An interesting feature is the Dolby Vision mode for games, which works with the Xbox Series X on the QNED93A. Here, the lag increases to about 20 ms. In theory, this could be considered a deterioration, but in practice, it’s still a very good result. Even with such a demanding picture standard, gameplay remains dynamic, and the differences in control are practically imperceptible.

Compatibility with PC

7.6/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
10ms
7ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
120Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D Compatibility with PC
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Compatibility with PC

The Samsung QN85D can be a solid option as a computer monitor. Its support for 4:4:4 chroma (available only in "Game" mode) ensures that text on the screen remains sharp and easy to read, which is essential for tasks such as working with text documents or spreadsheets. A notable advantage of this model is its exceptionally low input lag in "PC" mode – just 9 ms, providing excellent smoothness and responsiveness, making it suitable for both productivity tasks and gaming.

However, there are a few drawbacks. When displaying fonts on a dark background, an issue becomes apparent – zooming in on an image reveals that horizontal lines appear darker than vertical ones. This is because the subpixels in these areas do not fully illuminate, which seems to be a flaw in the algorithm responsible for rendering thin lines. As a result, text quality on dark backgrounds is not optimal. Despite this, the TV remains a solid choice as a PC monitor, especially given its low input lag and support for 4:4:4 chroma.

A new feature in this year's model is full support for 144 Hz refresh rate, which PC gamers will appreciate. The QNED93A works with both Nvidia graphics cards, offering compatibility with G-Sync, and with AMD products, where it supports FreeSync Premium Pro. This ensures smooth gameplay without screen tearing or stuttering, and the panel itself performs very well in dynamic esports titles and demanding AAA productions.

Equally important is the clarity of the image in everyday work. The television supports chroma 4:4:4, so fonts in Windows and applications are sharp and clear. However, we noticed a small detail - with a dark background and bright letters, subtle horizontal lines may appear due to the arrangement of subpixels. This is a minor detail that does not affect the comfort of using the television on a daily basis, but perfectionists may notice it after spending more time with text. But we don't think anyone would want to work on a 55-inch screen with text sitting less than 1 meter away from it 😉.

Viewing angles

2.9/10

2.9/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
84%
78%

The Samsung QN85D, due to its VA panel, has relatively poor viewing angles. When viewed from the side, colours lose their intensity, with less image contrast. This is a common drawback of VA panels, which generally offer significantly worse image quality when viewed from wider angles. However, when viewed directly in front of the TV, the situation improves considerably – the VA panel provides deep blacks and better contrast, which is a notable advantage if the TV is mainly watched from a central position.

QNED93A uses a VA matrix, and that means one thing: the category of viewing angles becomes its Achilles' heel. Already at an angle of about 45 degrees, brightness drops by as much as 80%, and colors begin to noticeably fade. This is the natural price for the high contrast that VA panels offer. There is no additional coating to improve angles, as found in some more expensive models, so the QNED93A looks best when viewed directly. If you are planning a large family viewing, where some viewers will sit more to the side, you should expect that the image will not be as attractive as it is at the center of the screen.

TV efficiency during daytime

7.3/10

6.2/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Average
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D TV efficiency during daytime
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV efficiency during daytime
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D TV efficiency during daytime
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV efficiency during daytime

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

LG QNED93A / QNED90A: 546 cd/m2

Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D: 825 cd/m2

The Samsung QN85D performs excellently in bright daytime conditions. Although the satin panel moderately suppresses reflections, its impressive brightness level of 825 cd/m² ensures that the TV remains highly readable even in bright sunlight. Large external light sources do not pose a significant issue, making this model a great choice for rooms with plenty of natural light.

LG QNED93A uses a satin matrix that handles reflections moderately well. It is certainly not at the level of matte screens, but it doesn't have the mirror-like effect seen in models with a glossy surface. As a result, reflections are not too bothersome, and colors maintain their intensity even when light from the window hits the screen. Brightness is also a plus. The average level in HDR mode stays within 550-600 nits. This means that the television performs well in well-lit rooms, and you can enjoy a viewing experience even during the day when the blinds are only partially closed. In the role of a large screen in the living room, the QNED93A really performs well.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
Mini-LED QLED
Software version during testing
1120
33.20.74
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D TV details about the matrix
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV details about the matrix

Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D

LG QNED93A / QNED90A

TV features

7.4/10

8.2/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    Yes
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D TV features
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D TV features
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D TV features
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN85D / QNX1D TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features

The Samsung QN85D offers a comprehensive range of smart features thanks to the Tizen platform. Users can access a variety of apps and functions, including SmartThings, which allows them to control not only Samsung devices but also products from other brands, enabling the creation of a fully integrated smart home ecosystem. The TV also supports AirPlay, making it easy to stream content from Apple devices directly to the screen, adding to its versatility and convenience.

This model stands out with its unique features as well. It includes Daily+, which provides diverse content daily, such as fitness exercises or workspace ideas. In terms of design, while it may not be as slim as last year's models, the TV still boasts a sleek and attractive look. The central stand offers solid support and enhances the overall elegance of the device.

In terms of user functions, the TV comes with a remote control compatible with decoders like Canal+, allowing users to control most home equipment with a single device. Additionally, the PiP (Picture-in-Picture) function lets viewers watch two image sources simultaneously. However, a notable drawback is the lack of a recording function, which may be a significant downside for some users.

Smart Features

QNED93A operates under webOS, one of the most enjoyable Smart TV systems. It includes AirPlay, Screen Mirroring, Chromecast, and convenient voice control. The platform is reasonably clear and mostly fast, although in the tested unit, there were instances where the response to pressing the remote required a moment of "thought." However, it is hard to consider this a serious issue – webOS remains a refined system and will likely receive further updates to improve it even more.

Classic Features

In this model, LG did not include the old Magic remote with a numeric keypad, but the TV itself performs excellently as a screen for everyday viewing of antenna channels. The EPG interface is clear, the TV offers a television guide, and we have the ability to record programs from the built-in tuners directly onto a USB drive. Everything works correctly and intuitively. We only missed the PiP function, which in 2025 is offered by just two manufacturers.

Magic Remote

The Magic remote is still the biggest difference compared to the competition. In 2025, it underwent a slight facelift – it has fewer buttons and resembles the minimalist remotes from Samsung a bit. However, the cursor remained key, functioning like a magic wand. Just move your hand, and the pointer on the screen follows your movement. It’s incredibly simple yet very convenient. Navigation in the menu or entering passwords is much faster, and it’s hard to switch back to classic buttons afterwards.

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

8.8/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
No
Yes
GIF
No
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in player on the Samsung QN85D should meet the needs of most users. It supports popular video and audio formats without major issues, providing solid compatibility with widely used codecs. However, more discerning users may notice some limitations – for instance, it does not support playing photos in the HEIC format, which is commonly used by Apple devices, nor does it handle several other less common photo formats.

The built-in media player in the LG QNED93A handles most popular video and audio formats without any issues, so it’s perfectly sufficient for basic use. However, during testing, we noticed two minor hiccups. The first is the lack of support for HEIC files, which is Apple’s photo format. The manufacturer claims that the television should open them, but in practice, we were unable to confirm that. The second issue involved text files with subtitles in TXT format. Fortunately, other, more common subtitle formats worked without any problems, so it's hard to consider this a real limitation in everyday use.

Apps

8.7/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Sound

7/10

6.9/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

The sound on the Samsung QN85D television is pleasant, with a subtle bass feel and clarity across the entire volume range. This is thanks to the built-in 2.2 40W speakers. Unfortunately, the lack of DTS audio format support may be problematic for users looking to enjoy a full audio experience. In such cases, it will be necessary to use an external player to get support for this format.

LG QNED93A sounds quite pleasant for the built-in speakers in the television. The sound is fairly clear, and at moderate volume levels, vocals and dialogues come across distinctly. The bass, as is usually the case in relatively slim constructions, is not the strongest, but its presence can be felt and is completely sufficient for everyday viewing of series. The maximum volume reaches around 81 dB and does not lead to strong distortions, although in more demanding cinematic scenes, it's noticeable that the system has its limitations. Overall, the sound can be described as acceptable and not off-putting. It definitely won't compete with a soundbar, but it also won't ruin your movie experience.

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

81dBC (Max)

75dBC