Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F vs Philips MLED920 / MLED910

Direct compare

Check the best price offer:

Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F
$777

QN70F / QN74F / QN77F

MLED920 / MLED910

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.1

6.5

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.7

    6.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.6

    6.8

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.7

    6.9

  • Gaming on console

    8.5

    8.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.2

    4.0

  • Watching in bright light

    6.3

    5.5

  • Utility functions

    7.2

    5.5

  • Apps

    8.7

    6.7

  • Sound quality

    6.4

    6.2

Advantages

  • Nice black and contrast

  • Above average panel brightness

  • High refresh rate of 144Hz

  • Many features for gamers: ALLM, VRR, Game Bar, etc.

  • Low input lag

  • 4 HDMI 2.1 ports

  • Extensive and smooth Tizen operating system

  • Super slim design

  • Solid black and high contrast thanks to mini-LED backlighting

  • HDR brightness reaching 700–800 nits in real movie scenes

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Ambilight – a feature that adds atmosphere, especially in the evening

  • Lots of supported audio formats: DTS:X, Dolby Atmos, Dolby True HD 7.1

  • 144 Hz panel with support for VRR, ALLM, and Dolby Vision Gaming

  • Loud sound (up to 88 dB)

  • Illuminated remote

Disadvantages

No like
  • No USB recording function

  • No DTS format

  • Issues with the HGIG function (for gamers)

  • Symbolic local dimming (Is this really MINI-LED?)

  • Titan OS is quite underdeveloped – there are significant bugs and deficiencies in the applications

  • Few user features

  • Hybrid infrared remote control

  • Issues with the fluidity of tonal transitions in dark scenes

  • The TV is not suitable (aside from gaming) for collaboration with a PC – strong dithering and poor readability of fonts, especially colored ones and on dark backgrounds

Our verdict

The Samsung QN70F is quite a decent mid-range television. Its strongest feature is definitely the smoothness of the image – thanks to the 144 Hz panel, low input lag, and a wealth of gamer features, we have here a recipe for nearly the perfect gaming display. It will also perform well for sports fans – the picture is fast, clear, and nothing tears. When it comes to picture quality – it's really not bad. The VA panel offers good black levels, brightness is better than average, and colors look great after calibration. Samsung advertises the QN70F as Neo QLED, meaning Mini LED, and in a certain sense, one can view it that way – but only partially. The backlighting is edge-lit, so it falls short of true Mini LEDs with local dimming. It's a shame because marketing does its job, and the user might feel a bit misled. Additionally, there are some small shortcomings – no USB recording, no DTS support. But despite everything, the QN70F makes a really good impression. It may not be a "true" Mini LED, but for its price, it's a solid piece of television – especially for gamers and anyone who enjoys fast, dynamic content.

The Philips MLED920 is a natural continuation of last year's PML9000 model, but it's not a repeat performance. It's clear that the manufacturer has done its homework – first and foremost, the local dimming algorithms have been improved, which last year tended to significantly degrade the viewing experience. Now, the blacks and contrast look much better, and when combined with the Dolby Vision here, even HDR content looks really decent. The picture occasionally shines where it should, and it doesn’t strain the eyes in more challenging scenes. Undoubtedly, the biggest advantage of the MLED920 is its unique Ambilight system. The three-sided backlighting can give films and games a completely new atmosphere – the screen seems to extend beyond its borders, and the entire room becomes part of the viewing experience. This is something that will be appreciated not only by movie enthusiasts but also by gamers, who, in addition to the lights, get a whole set of features typical for modern gaming TVs: 144 Hz, VRR, ALLM, and Dolby Vision Gaming. In this regard, Philips has a lot to offer. However, there is a significant caveat – this brings us to the most difficult part of this verdict – it is still dual-purpose equipment. On one hand, we have strong picture quality and a unique Ambilight feature, while on the other, there are hardware limitations that are hard to ignore. Titan OS in its current form is a significant bottleneck, filled with bugs and shortcomings that make the television lag behind the competition. Additionally, the price is not low considering the offered capabilities. Therefore, it's hard to recommend it unequivocally to everyone. However, if you are looking for the brightest Philips screen at a reasonable price, with Ambilight, a full set of features for gamers, and basic applications – the MLED920 will be quite a good choice.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Good
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel colour
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

6.2/10

7.9/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 20 (1 x 20)

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 144 (12 x 12)

Contrast:

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Contrast and black detail

Result

9,200:1

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Contrast and black detail

Result

7,000:1

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Contrast and black detail

Result

5,350:1

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Contrast and black detail

Result

5,700:1

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Contrast and black detail

Result

5,300:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

298,900:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

38,500:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

23,950:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

16,850:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,000:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Contrast and black detail
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Contrast and black detail
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

The QN70F is equipped with a VA panel that offers high native contrast – this is already a good starting point for blacks, especially for evening viewing. But theoretically, this does not end its capabilities. The television is branded as Neo QLED, which means the presence of Mini LED technology and a local dimming system. And indeed – the QN70F has such a function. The problem is that we are not talking about classical local dimming with LEDs placed directly behind the panel. Instead, edge lighting is used with a full-screen dimming mechanism known as global dimming. The effect of this is that instead of selective brightness control in individual zones, the entire screen is slightly dimmed when a dark scene appears. In practice, this means that the contrast is average compared to Mini LED models that offer true local dimming. The black level is not bad – it's thanks to the VA panel itself – but we cannot speak of precise light control that advanced systems with multiple zones provide. And here comes the question: is the QN70F series television really a Mini LED TV, or just a marketing variation on the Q70 series? Looking at the technical aspects – it is hard to consider this model a full-fledged representative of this technology. However, in everyday use, the black level looks decent and may be fully satisfying for many people.

The Philips MLED920 in the 55-inch version that we had the opportunity to test uses a high-contrast VA panel. The panel itself is one thing, but the true distinguishing feature of this model is the mini-LED backlighting. This largely determines how black levels and contrast appear – and it must be said that Philips has made a significant leap forward compared to the models from 2024, where the local dimming algorithms performed just mediocrely. In this new version, it's much better, and the contrast presented by the MLED920 can really pleasantly surprise. At times, it even resembles the level known from the best LCD TVs on the market – blacks can be deep, the image gains three-dimensionality, and viewing sessions in a dark room create a great impression. Of course, as is the case with any mini-LED TV, this is not an image entirely free from compromises. With a large amount of fine details on the screen, the local dimming algorithms can sometimes get confused – sometimes dimming details more than we would like, and at other times brightening the background, resulting in slight light blue halos around objects (the so-called halo effect). Despite these imperfections, we must emphasize that black levels and contrast are truly a strong point of the Philips MLED920 and definitely one of the reasons to consider it in the mid-range.

HDR effect quality

5.6/10

5/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Dolby Vision, HDR10, HLG, HDR10+
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 93.7%, Bt.2020: 75.7%
DCI P3: 89.9%, Bt.2020: 65.6%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Brightness measurement

Result

619 nit

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Brightness measurement

Result

449 nit

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Brightness measurement

Result

500 nit

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Brightness measurement

Result

422 nit

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Brightness measurement

Result

483 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

722 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

177 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

775 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

131 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

677 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F HDR effect quality
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F HDR effect quality
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F HDR effect quality
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 HDR effect quality

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F HDR effect quality
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

Philips MLED920 / MLED910

HDR luminance

Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F

HDR luminance

QN70F is a TV that can positively surprise when it comes to brightness. In ideal test conditions, it reaches even 800 nits, which – for this price range – is really solid. Of course, that's a result from measurement test patterns, so we decided to check how it performs in practice, with real movies. Here, the TV somewhat tones down its capabilities. In most of the tested scenes – for example, in "The Meg" – the actual HDR brightness was around 500 nits. That's still a good result that allows you to enjoy HDR effects, although it is far from perfect. On the other hand, we have a QLED screen with a quantum dot layer, which means very good color reproduction capabilities. The colors are vivid and saturated. QN70F covers about 94% of the DCI-P3 color space, and in the wider BT.2020 gamut, it exceeds 75%, so in this regard, there's nothing to be ashamed of.

In our measurements, the Philips MLED920 achieved even around 900 nits in static tests, which is a really solid result for a mid-range TV. In practice, this translates to a lot of satisfaction during viewing sessions – in scenes rich in bright light, such as the first, third, or fifth test screens, the screen was able to generate about 700 nits, which is enough to feel the true "HDR effect." However, it cannot be denied that the limited number of backlighting zones and the compromises of mini-LED dimming algorithms in more demanding scenes reveal their nature. In sequences with small light sources – such as the moon or a scene from the movie Sicario 2 – the television clearly prioritizes maintaining deeper blacks at the expense of the brightness of those small elements. For most viewers, this is still a reasonable compromise, as the dark background tends to look much better, though one must be aware that the details themselves may not impress with intensity. There is also some disappointment regarding colors. Although the applied PFS filter (the equivalent of quantum dots known from QLEDs) does its job and colors appear quite vivid, the coverage of the DCI-P3 color space reaches "only" 90%. In everyday viewing, this will be sufficient, but in extremely colorful productions – such as the latest Disney animations – one can notice that some tones are not as vibrant as they could be in other constructions.

Factory color reproduction

7/10

5/10

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Factory color reproduction
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Factory color reproduction
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the QN70F in the best default picture mode, which is Filmmaker Mode. It must be said that in this particular test unit, the factory settings performed quite well. The picture was calm, natural, and despite minor deviations, pleasant to perceive. The biggest flaw was a slight dominance of red in the white balance, which caused a slight pinkish tint to the entire scene. However, this was not a glaring flaw – rather subtle and only noticeable when directly compared to a properly calibrated screen. A somewhat larger issue appeared in the brightness characteristic. The television tends to understate the brightness of parts of the image that should be displayed more brightly. As a result, some details can appear slightly dimmed – not so much lost entirely, but not as clearly pronounced as they should be. Nevertheless, as far as a television in this category and in these settings goes, we consider the result to be a good starting point for further calibration.

Like every Philips television we tested, we primarily evaluated the MLED920 in Filmmaker mode – this is supposed to be the "most honest" mode, designed for films and to faithfully convey the creators' intentions. Indeed, in terms of colorimetry, it performs the best among all the modes available on the television, but it is not without its flaws. The first thing that stands out is the white balance. The image has a slight tendency to take on purple-pink tones, which gives it a somewhat unnatural character. However, an even bigger problem turned out to be what we mentioned earlier – image clipping. Just look at the gamma or EOTF graphs to see that the line deviates significantly beyond the norm, falling below the value of 1.8. In practice, this means "clipping" the brightest whites, where the image becomes almost milky. Fortunately, most of these issues can be corrected – the MLED920 responds to calibration, and with a few adjustments, the image quality can be significantly improved.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.5/10

7.5/10

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Color reproduction after calibration
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Color reproduction after calibration
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Color reproduction after calibration
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Color reproduction after calibration

After calibration, the QN70F shows that it can offer a really high level of color reproduction. It nearly perfectly balanced the white point, and the values in the Color Checker test dropped below 3 – that is, below the threshold at which the average eye can perceive differences. The image looks natural, and the colors are accurately represented, without excessive saturation or the coolness known from factory settings. It must be said that Samsung provides very extensive calibration options – not only for enthusiasts but also for professionals. The QN70F takes advantage of this potential and, after proper adjustment, can come close to much more expensive models in terms of color accuracy. The only thing one could still criticize is the brightness characteristics. There is still a tendency to brighten the smallest parts of the image – particularly those that should remain darker. However, this is a design feature of this model, not a calibration error. Despite this, the final effect definitely deserves recognition.

After calibration, we managed to largely tame the white balance – to the extent that the average viewer will not be able to detect color inaccuracies. The characteristic pink-purple glow that previously disturbed the naturalness of the picture has also disappeared. The color palette has been organized, and the colors appear more consistent and neutral. The gamma in SDR content after calibration looks really good – there's no sign of the earlier “bleeding” effect in bright scenes. The picture has become more contrasted and devoid of the milkiness that previously spoiled the perception significantly. In the case of HDR content, the improvement is also noticeable, although it is still evident that the television is “doing its own thing.” The EOTF curve cannot be fully shaped, as Philips simply does not provide tools in its settings that allow for precise control over this parameter. In many films, the television simply still showcases the image “in its own way.” Despite these limitations, calibration has brought quite a lot of good – it has managed to minimize most of the color inaccuracies and significantly improve the overall balance of the picture. However, it must be remembered that certain barriers arise from the very hardware construction and they simply cannot be overcome.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9/10

6.5/10

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Smoothness of tonal transitions

In terms of tonal transition fluidity, the QN70F performs really well. The gradients are smooth, and the colors blend into each other without noticeable thresholds or banding. Even in more challenging film scenes – especially very dark ones – any imperfections are minimal, and you really have to focus to notice them. In everyday viewing, most users should not encounter any issues with color blending. The image looks clean and coherent, without artificial smoothing or distortions. This is another aspect where the QN70F pleasantly surprises.

The fluidity of tonal transitions in the Philips MLED920 is not its strongest suit. In our tests, we quickly noticed that the television has noticeable problems in darker scenes – for example, segments from the movie The Green Knight or test grayscale palettes. There, you can see the characteristic banding of colors and too sharp transitions between shades, which can be quite noticeable in productions with a darker style. Fortunately, the situation looks better in brighter scenes – there the image appears smooth and free of major artifacts.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.9/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Samsung QN70F offers a distortion reduction feature that improves the smoothness of tonal transitions. In "Standard" mode, it works quite well - smoothing problematic transitions without significantly interfering with the image structure. Film grain is partially removed, but details such as texture or skin structure still remain visible. The "High" mode operates much more aggressively. The smoothing is stronger, but it comes at the cost of a noticeable loss of detail. Therefore, in practice, we recommend sticking with the "Standard" setting or completely turning off this feature. The improvement in gradation may be less spectacular, but the image retains more naturalness.

When it comes to scaling low-quality content, the QN70F performs very well. Tests with lower resolution images were really impressive. Despite slight aliasing of contours, everything looks clean and clear, even if the original content was very poor. It's just a shame that the TV has an overscan issue that cannot be completely turned off. As a result, the image from very low resolution may be slightly cropped, which is mainly visible on subtitles or the interface.

The manufacturer equipped this model with several features that improve signal quality, and although we usually approach such "enhancers" with skepticism, they turn out to be really helpful here. The key option is called "distortion reduction" – it works best at a medium level because, on one hand, it effectively smooths out unwanted banding and color transitions, while on the other, it doesn't excessively cut details, which keeps the image looking natural.

The situation is a bit worse with upscaling. Lower quality materials – such as test videos with models – appeared soft and lacking in sharpness. Yes, this can be somewhat corrected with the sharpness slider in the menu, but the effect still remains far from what competitors in a similar price range offer. Philips therefore still needs to work on this aspect because, in light of the successful improvement of tonal transitions, the upscaling simply performs poorly.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.5/10

7.8/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
63%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Smużenie (4K 144Hz):

Smużenie (4K@144Hz):

The QN70F is a television with a refresh rate of 144 Hz, which puts it at the forefront in terms of image smoothness. Whether we are watching dynamic sports broadcasts or playing on a console, the picture looks very good. There is no feeling of stuttering, chopping, or the typical "tearing" in fast motion that is common in lower-end models. Samsung also allows you to adjust the smoothness to your own preferences. In the picture clarity settings, we find options such as blur reduction and motion smoothing – each of which can be adjusted independently. This is especially useful when watching content with a lower frame rate and we want to give it a smoother, more cinematic character – or on the contrary, maintain the natural film "feeling" of 24 frames.

The Philips MLED920 features a 144 Hz panel, which immediately suggests that we shouldn’t complain about motion smoothness. And indeed – the motion blur is relatively low here for a VA panel, and although one might occasionally notice slight issues on darker backgrounds, they are not something that most people would notice during regular viewing.

A major plus is the presence of a motion smoother called "Motion Style." It allows you to adjust the smoothness to your own preferences – if someone prefers a more “theatrical,” almost television-like image, they can increase the sliders, and if they want to preserve the natural “jitter” of a cinematic frame, they just need to set lower values. This way, everyone can find the perfect balance.

Console compatibility and gaming features

8.2/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Samsung QN70F is truly a solid choice for gamers. Here we have as many as four HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gbps, which means full support for gaming in 4K at 144 Hz refresh rate. In addition, we have all the basic features we expect today: auto low latency mode (ALLM), variable refresh rate (VRR), and a very well-designed, intuitive Game Bar with information about the mode, resolution, and frame count.

It's also worth highlighting the Game Motion Plus feature, which allows you to add artificial frames to games running at 60 fps or less. It works surprisingly well and in many titles – especially those where consoles struggle to maintain a stable framerate – it improves gameplay smoothness without significant lag.

Unfortunately, there are also some drawbacks. The lack of support for Dolby Vision mode is not surprising – it's a standard for Samsung. But the much bigger disappointment is the absence of the HGiG feature. What's worse, it was removed in a software update, leaving users who previously used it quite shocked. Without HGiG, you can't manually set the maximum HDR brightness from the console, which results in some games looking slightly washed out – especially if the TV misinterprets the tonal range. Why did Samsung, a brand that has set standards in gaming features for years, decide to take such a step? It's hard to say. At the time of writing this review, the tested TV was running on software version 1110 – and frankly, if you care about full support for gamers, it's better to temporarily hold off on updates.

For gamers, the Philips MLED920 is truly a complete tool. The manufacturer has taken care of everything that today is considered standard in televisions designed for consoles and PCs. It features ALLM, so the console automatically switches the screen to game mode, it has VRR and 144 Hz refresh rate, which guarantees smooth gameplay even in fast titles. All key HDR formats are supported – including HGiG and Dolby Vision Gaming for Xbox – which means that regardless of what you are playing and on which console, the TV will be able to extract maximum potential from the image. In everyday gaming, the Game Bar also proves to be useful – a relatively simple implementation by Philips, but a functional panel where you can quickly check image parameters, turn on VRR, or adjust details without leaving the game. It may not be as advanced as the competition's offerings, but it performs its job flawlessly. And lastly, something that distinguishes Philips from its competitors – Ambilight. The three-sided LED backlighting can make a huge impression in games, especially in the evening. It also provides a way to slightly "expand" the screen and feel greater immersion. And since colorful LEDs have recently become almost a mandatory element of a gamer’s room, the MLED920 fits into this trend perfectly.

Input lag

10/10

9.6/10

SDR

1080p60
14 ms
18 ms
1080p120
8 ms
9 ms
2160p60
14 ms
17 ms
2160p120
7 ms
9 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
17 ms
2160p120
7 ms
9 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
35 ms
2160p120 DV
9 ms

QN70F does not disappoint in terms of response time either. For 120 Hz materials, input lag stays around 8 ms, which can be considered a very good result – especially in the context of online competition or fast-paced action games. The screen responds to controller movements almost instantly, without any noticeable delay. This allows for smooth and comfortable gameplay, even in more demanding titles. In this category, Samsung still maintains a high standard, and it’s hard to find anything that could raise concerns.

Input lag on the Philips MLED920 is really very good – in 120 Hz mode, we measured values below 10 ms, placing this model among the absolute leaders of LCD televisions in terms of responsiveness. Even at 60 Hz, a result of around 18 ms is fully acceptable and won’t hinder any type of gameplay. A certain exception is the Dolby Vision mode at 60 frames, where the lag can increase to even 35 ms. This result might be slightly noticeable for esports players, but we must honestly admit – for the majority of so-called “casual gamers,” it will be absolutely unnoticeable. Especially since we’re talking about values that still allow for comfortable gaming without major compromises.

Compatibility with PC

8.2/10

4/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
9ms
9ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F Compatibility with PC
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Compatibility with PC

Let's start with the best aspect when it comes to connecting the QN70F to a computer – that is gaming. The 144 Hz refresh rate, support for G-Sync compatible VRR, and very low input lag are the recipe for an almost perfect screen for PC gamers. In this role, the QN70F truly does not disappoint – games look smooth, responsiveness is at a very high level, and everything operates stably.

However, the performance when it comes to text work is somewhat lacking. At a 4K resolution and 144 Hz refresh rate, there is a noticeable lack of sharpness in the text outlines – the text can appear slightly blurred, with a slight "layering" of the outlines. This is not a problem that disqualifies the usability of the QN70F as a monitor, but those planning to do office work or text editing on this screen should keep this in mind.

When it comes to working with a PC, the Philips MLED920 evokes rather mixed feelings. On one hand, it looks impressive on paper – we have 144 Hz, support for G-Sync and FreeSync, so in terms of gaming on a PC, the television does not disappoint. Anyone looking for a large screen for computer gaming gets a solid package of features here. However, when we try to use it as a typical monitor for daily work, its limitations quickly become apparent. The fonts do not look their best – there is noticeable strong dithering, colorful letters can be jagged, and with very dark text, strange anomalies appear, as if the panel loses thin lines and has trouble accurately reproducing them. In short: Yes for PC gaming. For any work and reading text: a firm no.

Viewing angles

3.1/10

3.2/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
74%
68%

As for the VA panel, the viewing angles on the QN70F are typical – meaning rather average. The image quickly loses contrast and saturation when we start looking at the screen from a sharper angle. Compared to IPS panels, it's definitely weaker. On the other hand – it is precisely because of this panel that we gain better black levels and higher contrast when viewing straight on, which for many users will be more important than wide visibility from the sides.

The viewing angles on the MLED920 are classic for VA matrix technology – even a slight shift from the center causes the colors to begin to fade, the contrast weakens, and the overall picture becomes quite flat and unattractive. There are no miracles here. So if you’re watching movies with a larger group and everyone is sitting a bit off to the side, this will be slightly noticeable. On the other hand, you gain something for this: thanks to this matrix, the MLED920 can display a much deeper black than televisions with IPS panels.

TV efficiency during daytime

6.3/10

5.5/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F TV efficiency during daytime
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV efficiency during daytime
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F TV efficiency during daytime
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV efficiency during daytime

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

Philips MLED920 / MLED910: 421 cd/m2

Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F: 492 cd/m2

The QN70F handles a bright living room without any problems. The screen has a satin finish that effectively reduces reflections, so there's no need to immediately draw the curtains to see something. Even when there’s a lot of light in the room – for example, near a window on the side – the image still looks sharp and colorful. Brightness is also at a solid level. In SDR mode, the television averages around 500 nits, which is more than enough for daytime viewing. It may not be at the level of top models, but in practice – for everyday watching of TV, sports, or YouTube – it performs very well.

The Philips MLED920 performs fairly well in everyday use. The satin coating on the panel effectively reduces reflections, and in most moderately sunny living rooms, it manages unwanted glare. However, it is important to remember that this is not a television that impresses with brightness – the average value in SDR hovers around 450 nits. In very bright rooms, especially with large south-facing windows, the screen may not always overcome intense daylight. In such situations, it's worth supporting it with at least light curtains so that viewing comfort doesn't suffer significantly.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
QLED
Mini-LED PFS LED
Software version during testing
1110
TPN258E_V058.002.179.041
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F TV details about the matrix
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV details about the matrix

Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F

Philips MLED920 / MLED910

TV features

7.2/10

5.5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    Yes
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F TV features
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F TV features
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F TV features
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F TV features
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F TV features
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F TV features
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F TV features
Review Samsung Neo QLED QN70F / QN74F / QN77F TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features

TV Features

The QN70F does not forget about classic features that still matter to many users. On board, we find, among other things, picture-in-picture mode (PiP), enabled by the presence of two tuners, teletext, and "Audio Only" mode – ideal if we want to use the TV like a radio. We can effortlessly pair it with headphones or a soundbar via Bluetooth, and the remote – despite the lack of a numeric keypad – works reliably, allowing control of other devices and additionally does not require us to aim at the screen. However, it should be noted that, as with all new Samsung models, we will not find USB recording functionality here. This is a system limitation that the brand consistently adheres to.

Smart TV QN70F – Tizen

The Tizen system, developed by Samsung for years, is one of the most refined Smart TV interfaces. It is fast, clear, and feature-rich. The QN70F supports voice search (also in Polish), wireless screen sharing from a phone (both via AirPlay and Miracast), as well as integration with watches and other devices in the Samsung ecosystem. All of this is connected by the SmartThings app, which allows controlling devices, automating tasks, and connecting devices on one network. (Not only Samsung brand). However, it is not perfect. Tizen is a closed system, so the selection of applications can be somewhat limited – especially compared to Google TV. All the major streaming services are in place, but if you use less popular services, it's worth checking before purchase whether they are available in the Samsung store.

Smart TV – Titan OS

Philips MLED920 uses the proprietary Titan OS, which is just beginning its journey in the TV market, and unfortunately, this is evident at every turn. On one hand, we have basic features – such as support for AirPlay or the ability to mirror the screen from a smartphone, but on the other hand, its limitations quickly become apparent. Screen mirroring works only with a phone, but not with a laptop. Voice search? Yes, but it is only supported by Amazon Alexa and in languages supported by this assistant. The system runs fairly quickly, but every now and then it can "fail" and gives the impression of something unfinished, still developing.

Classic TV Functions

Titan OS does not pamper in terms of classic TV functions either. Besides the hybrid remote with a numeric keypad – which, although illuminated and cleverly designed in two modes, unfortunately works via infrared – we won't find anything that could truly distinguish the MLED920 from the competition. There is no USB recording or PiP function, and such solutions could be useful in this class. From unusual additions, we have an analog output in the form of a jack, which allows connecting headphones or older speakers. It’s a small nod to users who still use older equipment.

Ambilight TV

What definitely diverts attention from the shortcomings of Titan OS is the unique, three-sided Ambilight system. Here, Philips still plays in its own league and can amaze those who have not encountered this addition. The colorful lighting that responds to screen content gives screenings a unique atmosphere and is something that the competition does not offer in a similar form. It is Ambilight that is meant to ensure that other issues – both system and functional – take a back seat.

Playing files from USB

9/10

8.5/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
No
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

Samsung QN70F performs well in media playback – it easily runs pictures, music, and videos in the most commonly used formats. During testing, it opened JPG files, MP4, and TXT subtitles without any trouble, so for most people, this will simply be sufficient. However, there were a few files – despite having the correct extensions – that refused to play. It may be an issue with a specific version of the system, and the problem might disappear after future updates.

The built-in player in the Philips MLED920 works quite well and handles most popular audio and video files without major issues – exactly as you can see in our test table. There is no need to worry about typical movie or music formats. We can only nitpick about the somewhat selective support for photo formats and certain resolutions.

Apps

8.7/10

6.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Sound

6.4/10

6.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    84dB
    88dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

The Samsung QN70F is quite average in terms of sound, which shouldn't be surprising given the exceptionally slim design of the television. The built-in speakers will perform adequately during daily news watching or simpler content, but it's hard to speak of any depth or spaciousness of sound here. It's simply a compromise that one has to accept when choosing an elegant and thin design over a bulkier housing with a better audio system.

The sound in the Philips MLED920 is probably not going to be the element that impresses you the most. It sounds rather flat, lacking depth and clearer bass, which means that movies or concerts don’t have the extra layer of immersion that a better audio system can provide. However, it must be noted that the volume is really decent – the TV can reach up to 88 decibels. A big plus of the MLED920 is not so much the sound quality itself, but the support for audio formats. Philips has ensured compatibility with nearly all the major standards, including Dolby Atmos, DTS, and Dolby TrueHD 7.1. As a result, if someone decides to connect an external soundbar or receiver, they will encounter no limitations and will be able to enjoy the fullness of cinematic sound.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

84dBC (Max)

75dBC

88dBC (Max)

75dBC