Philips PUS8359 (VA) vs Samsung Q7F

Direct compare

Check the best price offer:

Samsung Q7F
$472

PUS8349 / PUS8359

Available screen sizes: 50”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”85”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.4

5.7

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.2

    5.7

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.4

    5.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.5

    5.3

  • Gaming on console

    6.4

    6.3

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.0

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    4.7

    3.9

  • Utility functions

    5.3

    6.6

  • Apps

    6.2

    8.7

  • Sound quality

    6.1

    5.8

Advantages

  • Colour reproduction after calibration

  • Dynamic tone mapping function - recovers details that are too bright for the television

  • Smooth tonal transitions

  • Very good cooperation with computers and consoles - low input lag, chroma 4:4:4

  • Solid native contrast (VA Panel)

  • Vivid colors thanks to the QLED filter

  • Low input lag (around 10MS)

  • Advanced and smooth Tizen operating system

  • Small sleek pilot with Type-C charging

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness of HDR materials

  • Missing a significant portion of essential applications

  • Poor viewing angles

  • Very low brightness (only 250 nits in HDR)

  • Lack of many features for gamers, including VRR and HGiG – the manufacturer promised something, but ultimately these features are simply not there

  • Lack of many classic "TV" features, e.g., USB recording or PIP

  • No Dolby Vision

  • Average quality of digital image processing

Our verdict

Philips PUS8359 in 50" is a straightforward television, but offers sufficient features to satisfy many consumers. Its most notable feature, which is common across the brand, is the Ambilight backlighting. At this price point, this addition is certainly valuable and may be a deciding factor for many buyers. While it’s unrealistic to expect a flawless picture in this price range, some models offer more, and in our view, this television is one of them.

In particular, the quality of tonal transitions, colour reproduction after calibration, and performance when connected to a computer stand out. With low input lag, casual gaming is quite enjoyable. However, the unit does have its drawbacks. The low luminance in HDR content and limited DCI-P3 colour gamut coverage are noteworthy issues. That said, the dynamic tone mapping feature works efficiently.

While the contrast and black levels are not exceptional, they are certainly better than those found in units with IPS/ADS panels. The operating system is one of the better ones, though it is still being developed and lacks many features, which we will address in a dedicated section. Additionally, it doesn’t offer as broad an app library as its competitors, though this should change soon.

Who is the PUS8359 for? It is suited for anyone seeking a balance between quality and price.

Samsung Q7F is the cheapest model from the manufacturer in the QLED line, and it must be admitted that several advantages can easily be pointed out. After calibration, the colors look really good, and the additional QLED filter makes the hues more saturated than in typical budget LCD TVs. In addition, there is a VA panel that offers quite decent native contrast. It is certainly not at the level of top constructions, but it does fine for everyday viewing. The biggest plus, however, is the Tizen system, which is Samsung's flagship card. It runs smoothly, is well-developed, provides access to a plethora of applications and add-ons, and at the same time allows you to easily connect the TV to the SmartThings ecosystem and control other devices in the home. And this is basically where the list of pros ends, because the longer you use the Q7F, the more it becomes clear that it is a heavily unfinished product. It is not just about the panel itself with its low brightness and mediocre picture quality in HDR films, but also about the lack of features that usually worked flawlessly in Samsung TVs. The manufacturer claims the presence of VRR and HGiG, but in practice, they are of no use, which makes it difficult to recommend the TV even to casual gamers. It also doesn't perform very well for regular television, as the digital image processing is at best average, and the tonal transition improvement feature, which usually performed excellently in Samsung TVs, here practically does not work. The Q7F is a product that can only be recommended to those looking for a TV with two phrases on the box: “QLED” and “good Smart TV”. The rest receive a rather bland product that lacks a lot to compete even with other more budget-friendly offerings. It is a shame because usually the word "QLED" in Samsung meant something more than just an ordinary TV.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Stand type
stand-type-Graphite
stand-type-Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Height adjustment, Base adjustment
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.6/10

4.7/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,400:1

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,950:1

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,500:1

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,650:1

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,800:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,850:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,750:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

3,300:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

3,050:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,750:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

The Philips PUS8359/12 in the 50-inch version is equipped with a VA panel, which is worth highlighting as the manufacturer often uses them interchangeably with IPS/ADS panels, depending on the screen size. This is particularly important in terms of contrast and black levels, which are key factors in assessing picture quality. The panel features direct backlighting (Direct LED), but it lacks local dimming support, a characteristic that is expected given the device’s price range.

Nonetheless, the choice of VA panel allows for superior black levels and contrast compared to the IPS/ADS panels that lack advanced backlighting systems. The television’s simple construction also benefits the visibility of detail in dark areas. In our first test scene from Oblivion, the black levels were quite good, with impressive light separation, a feat that even more expensive models sometimes struggle with. A second test frame from The Revenant also appeared quite solid. While some blooming from the backlighting is noticeable due to construction limitations, the details in darker scenes remain well-defined and difficult to fault. However, it must be noted that the black levels could still be deeper.

The Samsung Q7F in the tested size of 55 inches has a VA panel, which immediately translates to decent native contrast. Values around 3000:1 may not be record-breaking, as we know that VA panels are currently being produced with more than double the contrast, but it still performs much better than IPS or ADS panels, where blacks quickly fade into shades of gray or navy blue. Unfortunately, we won't find typical local dimming zones here, but the manufacturer has added something resembling global dimming – meaning the whole screen darkens in relation to the content. The effect? In most scenes, blacks look quite solid, although during night screenings, we can still see that they resemble dark navy blue or gray rather than true pitch black. Overall, it's okay, but without fireworks – it's not spectacular, but it's also not a disaster.

HDR effect quality

4.6/10

3.7/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 83.0%, Bt.2020: 61.0%
DCI P3: 92.4%, Bt.2020: 69.2%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

281 nit

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

280 nit

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

324 nit

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

290 nit

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

320 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

215 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

225 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

267 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

113 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung Q7F

HDR luminance

Philips PUS8359 (VA)

HDR luminance

The Philips PUS8359 has low brightness levels; however, dynamic tone mapping works surprisingly well, making it worth praising!

Unfortunately, the Samsung Q7F is not one of the bright televisions, and this directly affects the quality of HDR movies. The peak brightness of the panel is only about 250 nits, which is definitely too low to speak of true cinematic experiences. In practice, the image in HDR content does not differ significantly from classic SDR, making it hard to talk about any "wow effect" that usually accompanies us while watching such films. During testing movie scenes, the image simply looked dim, and brightness almost invariably hovered around the mentioned 250 nits. The worst performance was observed in shots with small, intensely glowing elements – the applied global dimming technique reacted very aggressively, dimming the entire screen to maintain the black effect. On the plus side, it is worth noting the presence of a QLED coating that expands the color palette. As a budget QLED model, the Q7F performs quite decently here: its DCI-P3 color coverage is about 93%, and BT.2020 reaches 70%. This means that colors, despite the low brightness, can look quite vivid and attractive.

Factory color reproduction

4/10

5/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

The best factory mode for fidelity to the source material was the "Film" mode, which we used during our tests. As with all factory modes in televisions, it has flaws, and we’ll now examine what went wrong in both SDR and HDR materials. In both cases, the white balance showed an excessive dominance of green and red, resulting in a yellowish tint across the entire image. This caused issues such as yellowed whites and problems with skin tones. This was clearly illustrated on the "ColourChecker" palette, where each tested sample shifted towards warmer equivalents. The foundation of the image lies in contrast and black levels, represented by gamma charts and the EOTF curve. Looking at the gamma chart, we saw a real rollercoaster, with both elevated and lowered gamma. The elevated gamma caused visibility issues in blacks, while the lowered gamma led to a dramatic drop in contrast. In this context, the EOTF curve performed significantly better, as it only mildly brightened the image.

The factory color reproduction in the Samsung Q7F definitely isn't one of its strong points. In Filmmaker mode, which theoretically should be closest to neutral, the white balance issue is immediately noticeable. There's too much red on the screen, while blue is noticeably lacking. The effects of this are very easy to see – white, instead of being neutral, takes on warm, almost slightly orange tones. Over time, this makes the entire image look somewhat unnatural, and bright areas of the scene can seem unrealistic. The problems become even more apparent in HDR content. The graphs show that the TV has significant errors in the Color Checker palette, which translates to visible inaccuracies in the real image. In practice, this means that colors are not presented as they should be. The Q7F also heavily manipulates brightness; darker elements are overly boosted, causing them to lose their cinematic feel, while bright parts can appear dimmed. As a result, the image seems flattened, and instead of helping to bring out details, contrast only highlights its own limitations. This is particularly frustrating in HDR materials, as every detail matters there. In scenes where a subtle play of light and shadow should be felt, the Q7F either overdoes the brightening or, conversely, suppresses elements that were meant to draw the eye. This causes the image to lose its depth, and instead of cinematic realism, we get more of a simplification effect.

Color reproduction after calibration

5/10

7.6/10

Philips offers a wide range of image calibration tools in its higher-end and more affordable models. We used these tools, but the process was not as straightforward as many might expect. While we adjusted the white balance, significantly improved the gamma, and refined the EOTF curve in both SDR and HDR content, the deltaE errors remained extremely high. Several factors contribute to this situation, including the limited coverage of the DCI-P3 colour gamut and the unit's maximum brightness in HDR materials.

After professional calibration, we managed to bring the Q7F in order – at least in terms of SDR content. The picture in this mode looks really good: the white balance has been set correctly, the colors appear natural, and errors in the color palette have dropped to values that are practically invisible to the eye. The gamma behaves excellently, and the only minor drawback is a slight brightening of smaller elements, which results from the lack of local dimming. For everyday TV watching or standard quality films, the Q7F performs surprisingly well.

It was much more difficult to tame HDR content. Despite adjusting the white balance, the television continues to manipulate brightness significantly, causing scenes to sometimes look unnatural – what was meant to be subtly darker can end up being overly brightened, and bright parts of the image sometimes appear dull. The final effect is better than in the factory settings, but it is evident that the design limitations of the Q7F do not allow for fully utilizing the potential of HDR materials.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.4/10

9/10

The fluidity of gradation in the Philips PUS8359 is quite good. Almost every scene maintains smooth tonal transitions. The most challenging scene, the second one from the film The Green Knight, didn’t prove to be a "deal-breaker" and demonstrated that the television handles it excellently within its price range. The only minor issue we noticed was in the darkest scenes, where some occasional fluidity problems were visible, but these were relatively selective. Overall, we rate the fluidity of tonal transitions very highly. It is important to note, however, that this feature is not available in HDR materials.

The fluidity of tonal transitions in the Q7F is really impressive. The gradients are smooth, without strong steps or artificial divisions that can be quite noticeable in cheaper televisions. Even in more challenging scenes, like the one from The Revenant or the red shot of the actor flowing in water, the image held its level and simply looked good. If someone examines it very closely, they might notice slight imperfections in extremely demanding moments, but they are subtle enough that most people won't even notice them. For this price range, the Q7F handles gradation surprisingly well, and it's hard to find anything serious to criticize.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6/10

4.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
No
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

In this paragraph, we will take a look at two functionalities. We will once again look at the function responsible for tonal transitions, but we will also check how the television handles image scaling. The option responsible for smooth gradation is called "Distortion Reduction." As we have established, it quite effectively smooths out imperfections. However, we need to point out two things: we cannot enable it for HDR material and it blurs details in films.

The tested television cannot boast the best image scaling. There is a noticeable overall blurriness of the image, but what is worse, it blurs details. This is particularly visible on the branches and the model's hair. Additionally, a characteristic white halo can often be seen surrounding characters.

Upscaling and digital image processing in the Q7F is a bit of a sine wave. On one hand, we have really nice upscaling – weaker sources look better than one might expect. The image becomes clearer, sharper, and even older movies or terrestrial TV hold up well. Samsung has been strong in this area for years, and the Q7F confirms that. On the other hand… things start to get tricky. The TV has a problem with overscan – part of the image is simply cut off, and it looks rather unrefined. Additionally, we were let down by a feature called "noise reduction," which should improve the smoothness of tonal transitions in weaker materials. In other Samsungs, it works relatively well, but here it practically makes no difference – the banding in gradients remains. It's a bit disappointing because we could have expected more from a model that is aimed at users looking for a display for SDR content.

Blur and motion smoothness

3.8/10

5.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
-
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
-
-
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
49%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

The Philips PUS8359 is not the best choice for watching sports. This is primarily due to the absence of even a basic motion smoothing feature, which given the price point, is not entirely surprising. Additionally, the television uses a VA panel, which, while offering high contrast, is not known for its sharpness or fast response times. As demonstrated in our analysis, fast-moving scenes often result in noticeable blurring, a common issue with this type of panel.

Although it is not an ideal option, the TV can be used for sports viewing with some compromises, particularly regarding motion sharpness. It's also worth noting that films are prone to stuttering since the TV lacks any form of motion smoothing, even the most basic functionality.

Motion blur and motion fluidity in the Q7F is probably the most budget-conscious element of this TV. The 60 Hz panel is noticeable, with blur being quite evident, especially in dynamic scenes, and it's rather difficult to consider this model as equipment designed for watching sports or playing fast-paced games. In tests with the little green man, there was a long tail, and the ball in a football match would leave trails behind it.

On the plus side, the presence of motion smoothing is commendable. It really makes a difference in movies - especially since most materials are recorded at 24 frames. Here we can decide for ourselves whether we prefer a more "cinematic" image, with the slight jerkiness characteristic of cinema, or a smoother, more "television-like" one. This actually works quite well and helps improve the viewing comfort for series or movies.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

3.3/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    No
  • VRR range
    60
    No
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Unsurprisingly the Philips PUS8359/12 offers only the most basic support for consoles. When connecting a console, users can rely on features like VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) and ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode). VRR is particularly commendable, as even some higher-end models can struggle with this functionality.

A noteworthy addition is the implementation of a dedicated GameBar, which allows for on-the-fly adjustments without needing to exit the game, minimising unnecessary distractions. This feature also provides options to tailor gameplay for individuals with disabilities, making it a highly commendable inclusion.

Features for gamers in the Samsung Q7F is a topic that evokes quite a bit of mixed emotions. On one hand – no sensible person expected miracles here, after all, it's a 60 Hz television, and it was clear from the beginning that it wouldn't be a device to extract the maximum from a console or PC. On the other hand, since the manufacturer promised specific solutions in promotional materials, it's natural that we wanted to see them in practice. At the start, it's quite decent. The automatic game mode (ALLM) works, so there's no need to manually fiddle with the settings; the console switches the TV to low latency mode by itself. Additionally, we have the Game Bar, which looks impressive and allows you to check a few basic parameters without leaving the game. And this is where the good news ends.

The biggest problem with the Q7F is VRR, or rather its absence. Indeed, a relevant icon appears in the menu, and you can even see it in the Game Bar, but throughout the entire test, the function remained dead and could not be activated in any way. The issue with HGiG is even more painful; this option was actually available at the beginning, but after a software update, it disappeared completely, which is simply unprofessional. Therefore, the Q7F is only suitable for absolute basics. Sure, you can turn on the console, play more mellow titles, and enjoy low input lag, but if someone is counting on more advanced features that the manufacturer promised, they will be disappointed. This is not a television intended for gaming, and it's better to be aware of this before purchasing.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
12 ms
13 ms
1080p120
2160p60
12 ms
13 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
11 ms
12 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

After connecting to a console the measured input lag was excellent, leaving nothing to criticise. At both FHD and 4K settings, we recorded latencies of 12ms, while adding HDR to the higher resolution further reduced the lag to 11ms. Each of these results is highly commendable, ensuring gameplay is virtually free from delays at the controller-to-screen level.

The input lag on the Samsung Q7F is really good for a 60 Hz display. Measurements showed values below 12 ms, which means that for regular gaming on a console, this model is more than sufficient. Of course, it doesn’t match the top-level 120 Hz screens that can go below 6–7 ms, but in everyday use, it's hard to talk about noticeable delay. In this regard, the Q7F does not lag behind the competition in its segment and can easily be considered a safe choice for casual or sports gaming. At least in this respect.

Compatibility with PC

6/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
11ms
13ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No

Connecting the Philips PUS8359 to a computer poses no significant issues for gaming. The latency remains excellent, with 4K HDR settings delivering an 11ms input lag—an imperceptible value along the eye-screen-mouse line. Additionally, the tested TV supports 4:4:4 chroma, ensuring that working with text files is seamless and free from visual discomfort.

Cooperation with a PC on the Q7F is decent, although it's not a TV that will satisfy the most demanding users. The fonts are displayed clearly and sharply, so you can comfortably work on it – especially for everyday office tasks or browsing the internet. With thin letters, you can notice slight shading, but it's not something that interferes with normal use. In a smaller size, the Q7F can actually work as a computer screen, although you have to keep its limitations in mind. The lack of variable refresh rate means that we won't benefit from G-Sync or FreeSync, and 60 Hz effectively closes the door to more demanding PC gaming. For work and light use, it will be okay, but for serious gaming, it's definitely better to look for something higher up in Samsung's offering.

Viewing angles

3.4/10

3.5/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
65%
78%

The brightness drop at a 45-degree angle is 65%, indicating that even a slight deviation from the centre of the screen can result in noticeable discomfort due to colour degradation and image fading. This is a common characteristic of most VA panels that lack wide-viewing angle coatings.

The viewing angles on the Q7F are simply poor – typical for VA panels. Just sitting slightly to the side and it's immediately clear that the picture loses quality. Colors fade, contrast significantly drops, and blacks begin to resemble more of a gray than anything deep. This is a television that is definitely best viewed straight on, and any larger viewing angle comes with compromises.

TV efficiency during daytime

4.7/10

3.9/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

Samsung Q7F: 237 cd/m2

Philips PUS8359 (VA): 318 cd/m2

The Philips PUS8359/12 matrix has a satin finish. This finish effectively minimises light reflections, allowing for relatively comfortable TV viewing during the day. It is worth noting that the maximum brightness of the TV in SDR content is around 320 nits, which is a respectable result, particularly as the brightness is maintained even with 100% white screen fill.

The performance of the Q7F during the day unfortunately does not impress. Due to low brightness, the screen quickly succumbs in very sunlit rooms. Therefore, it is difficult to recommend it to those who plan to watch television in a bright living room with large windows. In moderately lit rooms, it still manages, but in bright light, the picture loses clarity. Additionally, the fact that the panel does not always effectively handle reflections means that during the day, glare can be problematic. This is more of a screen for evening viewing than for daily sessions in full sunlight.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
White LED
QLED
Software version during testing
V246.003.000.131
T-RSLFDEUC-0090-1110.7, E2500007, BT-S
Image processor
nie wiem ale chyba tredriper

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Philips PUS8359 (VA)

Samsung Q7F

TV features

5.3/10

6.6/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    No
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes

It is impossible not to first mention the most distinctive feature of the manufacturer's televisions: the multicoloured Ambilight backlighting. Positioned on the rear casing, this feature adjusts colours to match the on-screen content, often enhancing the immersive experience.

The operating system powering the Philips PUS8359/12 is Philips' proprietary TitanOs. Compared to the manufacturer's Google TV models, TitanOs is significantly more closed and limited in its application resources. For instance, important apps such as Apple TV, MAX, Canal+, and Player are absent. This closed nature also extends to basic functionalities; users cannot program recordings or record content to USB.

Apple device users may find the lack of AirPlay functionality disappointing, as it prevents seamless screen streaming. On the positive side, users can connect a keyboard and mouse for easier navigation of the TV menu. Wired headphone support is available, and audio can simultaneously play through the TV’s speakers when headphones are connected. However, the remote control uses IR rather than Bluetooth, which feels outdated.

In summary: TitanOs comes with several limitations, especially for users relying on a wide range of streaming platforms. It is better suited for those sticking to the "holy trinity" of Netflix, YouTube, and CDA.

Smart TV – Tizen system

Here Q7F shows its strongest side. Samsung has been developing the Tizen system for years, and it is evident that we are dealing with a mature, refined platform. Everything works smoothly, the menu does not lag even when switching between heavier applications, and installing additional programs from the library is quick and hassle-free. Additionally, there is full support for AirPlay, integration with voice assistants, as well as a wide range of add-ons – from collaboration with devices in the SmartThings ecosystem to the ability to control Philips Hue smart lighting or other smart gadgets. Samsung strongly focuses on advanced network features, and it shows – in terms of Smart TV, Q7F has absolutely nothing to be ashamed of, and on the contrary, it can put more expensive competitor models to shame.

Classic Features

On the side of classic "TV" solutions, it is clear that the manufacturer has put everything on the smart card. We will not find USB recording or PiP mode here, features that used to be standard. It is evident that Q7F is primarily intended to be a media center, not a device for users accustomed to more traditional solutions. Fortunately, there are several practical additions – we have Bluetooth for pairing headphones or speakers and the option to change the font size in the menu, which will be appreciated by users with weaker eyesight.

Playing files from USB

8/10

9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
No
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
No
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
No
Yes

The default media player built into the Philips PUS8359/12 offers a broad range of capabilities, though it does have its limitations. It supports nearly all video formats except Dolby Vision and the less common .asf format. However, a notable drawback is the lack of support for the H.265 HEVC codec at high bitrates.

For photos, the player performs adequately but does not support some widely used resolutions and formats, such as HEIC, commonly found on Apple devices. The strongest performance is seen with audio playback, where the player excels and leaves little to criticise.

Unfortunately, due to the limitations of the TitanOs system, there is no option to expand the player's functionality, leaving users restricted to what the manufacturer has provided.

In the Q7F, we have a built-in file player, and as is usually the case with Samsung TVs, it works quite well – most popular movies or music play without any fuss. For basic use, it’s sufficient, and there’s usually no need to reach for external solutions like connecting a laptop. It’s worse if someone wants to upload photos – it can stumble here, especially with Apple’s HEIC or PNG, which are visible in the player menu but don’t necessarily want to work.

Apps

6.2/10

8.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
No
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Sound

6.1/10

5.8/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    80dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The audio system built into the Philips PUS8359/12 features a basic 2x 10 W speaker configuration. Unsurprisingly, such a setup does not offer much in terms of performance. However, if the volume remains below 50% of its maximum level, the audio quality is satisfactory and unlikely to draw criticism.

For a significantly improved experience, it is highly recommended to connect even an affordable soundbar. Thanks to the range of codecs supported by the manufacturer, including Dolby Atmos and DTS-HD Master Audio, external audio devices will undoubtedly enhance the overall sound quality.

The Samsung Q7F comes with a 20 W speaker system and… well, there’s no point in sugarcoating it; it’s not really impressive. The TV itself sounds quite decent, meaning we can clearly hear series, news, or daily programs, and the dialogues are not lost, but there is a lot lacking in depth and sound space. There is practically no bass; something thuds, but it resembles more of a knock on a box than true low tones. Music sounds flat, and movies also don't make any significant impression – we won’t feel like we're in a cinema. It’s a sound in the category of “acceptable,” just enough to have something built-in, but if someone is counting on stronger experiences, they will sooner or later reach for a soundbar anyway. And to be honest – even the simplest model will make a significant difference here, and Samsung has quite a few of those in their offering.

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

80dBC (Max)

75dBC