Philips PUS8209 vs LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A

Direct compare

PUS8209

QNED85A / QNED86A / QNED87A / A6A / A6B / A6C

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”86”100”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.3

7.0

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.4

    6.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.1

    6.2

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.9

    7.2

  • Gaming on console

    6.6

    8.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    8.0

  • Watching in bright light

    4.4

    5.8

  • Utility functions

    4.7

    8.4

  • Apps

    6.2

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    5.0

    6.0

Advantages

  • High native contrast

  • Three-sided Ambilight system – unique wall lighting behind the TV, enhancing immersion while watching

  • Low input lag – around 13 ms

  • Has basic gaming features - VRR and ALLM

  • Support for Polish characters and subtitle customization – built-in player allows changing the color and size of the font

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS – a wide range of supported audio codecs

  • 120 Hz panel, good for sports and gaming

  • Very low input lag

  • Great for gamers (VRR, ALLM, HGiG, etc.)

  • Full set of HDMI 2.1 ports

  • Good compatibility with PC (great font readability)

  • Bright picture (around 700 nits in HDR), works well in moderately bright rooms

  • Good viewing angles (IPS)

  • Supports Dolby Vision

  • User-friendly webOS operating system with Magic Remote and voice assistant

  • Ability to record programs to USB

Disadvantages

No like
  • Titan OS operating system – limited number of applications

  • Poor brightness (280 nits) – issues with viewing in bright environments

  • Poor viewing angles – typical for VA panels

  • Issues with font display

  • Very poor black and contrast due to the IPS panel

  • Lack of the declared 144 Hz in PC mode

  • Aggressive "light bars" when dimming is enabled (edge local dimming ruins evening movie screenings)

  • Confusion in markings and versions – even TVs with the same name in different stores can have different stands (central or two legs) or frame colors, which can be very misleading when purchasing.

Our verdict

Philips PUS8209 is a model that stands out primarily due to its unique Ambilight system. The three-sided backlighting behind the television dynamically adjusts to the image, adding a special atmosphere while watching movies or playing games. This solution, which Philips is known for, makes a difference and can be a great choice for those looking for something more unconventional in their daily usage. In terms of picture quality, the television performs quite well, especially in this price range. The VA panel provides solid contrast and decent blacks, which works particularly well in the evening in dark rooms. Watching movies in such conditions is genuinely pleasant, although the screen brightness (280 nits) leaves a lot to be desired – in bright rooms, the image can look pale, and HDR content does not make a significant impression. As for gaming, the PUS8209 also has a few advantages. Support for VRR, ALLM, and a low input lag of 13 ms make gameplay smooth and responsive. Of course, this is not equipment for advanced gamers, but for those who occasionally pick up a controller, it should be sufficient. The biggest downside is the Titan OS operating system. Many popular apps are missing, and the interface does not always run as smoothly as one would wish. The remote, which requires aiming at the TV, can be irritating, especially in situations where quick response is expected. In summary: the Philips PUS8209 is a television that will serve basic purposes well. Ambilight adds uniqueness and enhances the atmosphere while watching. In daily use or occasional gaming, it holds up, but its limitations – particularly in screen brightness and the operating system – may be problematic for more demanding users. If we are looking for simple equipment with an unusual visual addition, this model is worth considering.

QNED86A6A is a television that really does a great job in its price class when it comes to sports, gaming, and everyday TV watching. The 120 Hz panel makes the picture smooth and the motion sharp, which will be appreciated by both fans and gamers. Additionally, it has low input lag along with a full set of gaming features such as HGiG, VRR, and ALLM. The TV works just as well with a computer as it does with a console, so in the office or on a desk in the 43” version, it will perform excellently as a work monitor. Another strong point is the webOS system. It is a fast, stable, and app-rich operating system that, paired with the Magic remote, provides very convenient control. The new version of the remote is slimmer and fits better in the hand, and the cursor on the screen is a solution that many competitors lack. It also includes classic features – USB recording, Bluetooth for headphones, and a full set of HDMI 2.1 with eARC and Dolby Atmos support. This makes the QNED85 series TVs some of the most "multimedia" televisions in their class. But let's not sugarcoat it; this model also has its significant drawbacks. Its biggest flaw is undoubtedly the contrast, or rather the lack of it. The IPS panel combined with edge "mini-LED" is simply a very bad idea. The screen is simply not suitable for watching movies in a dark living room. The blacks are grayish-blue, and local dimming can generate light stripes resembling lasers, which effectively ruins the viewing experience. For home theater, this is not a choice that can be recommended with full conviction. The second problem may not be directly related to the TV itself but to its sales. It concerns the chaos in naming and the differences in derivative versions. The same model, even with the same designation, can have a different frame color or stand depending on the store. This can really be frustrating for the buyer and create a sense of confusion. In summary: LG QNED86A6A is a great TV for sports, gaming, and everyday television, with a convenient system and great functionality. But if you are looking for a screen specifically for movies or series and require deep blacks, it is better to look towards TVs that can truly be called Mini-LEDs with full confidence.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Legs
Central
Stand type
stand-type-Graphite
stand-type-Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Height adjustment
Flat design
No
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

6.6/10

3.7/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 6 (1 x 6)

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,050:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

7,300:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

10,200:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

9,050:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,200:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,050:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

1,750:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,800:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

1,850:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

1,350:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Philips PUS8209 positively surprised us in terms of contrast, which is really solid for its price range. Thanks to the use of a VA panel, it achieved a contrast level of 8000:1, which can be considered a very good result in this price category. In tests using scenes from the movie Oblivion, the television performed well, offering visible light separation. Three independent light sources in the test scene were reproduced without major issues. Similarly, in the case of the film Sicario 2, where the black levels, although not perfect, appear decent, allowing for the differentiation of details in darker parts of the image. The lack of local dimming technology is noticeable, however, the manufacturer has implemented a "global dimming" feature. This mechanism allows the television to automatically dim or brighten the entire screen depending on the content, which somewhat improves the perception of contrast. Philips PUS8209 offers solid contrast and decent results in tests. Although it lacks the precision of local dimming, its capabilities at this price are satisfactory and will please most users.

Although the manufacturer describes the QNED86A as a Mini-LED television, one would be hard-pressed to find the multi-zone local dimming system known from more expensive models. In practice, we are dealing with classic edge lighting that only allows for dimming horizontal bands of the screen from top to bottom. Combined with the low-contrast IPS/ADS panel, the effect is simply poor. If we decide to keep local dimming enabled, a problem arises – the television can illuminate selected areas in such a way that it appears like “flying lasers” crossing the screen. This is very distracting, and it is difficult to claim a truly cinematic experience under such conditions. Therefore, in our opinion, it is better to disable this function. However, one has to reckon with the fact that the contrast then drops to around 1500:1, but at least the image does not irritate with artificial flashes.

HDR effect quality

3.8/10

6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 91.4%, Bt.2020: 67.0%
DCI P3: 95.4%, Bt.2020: 73.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

231 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

268 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

278 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

274 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

281 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

602 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

524 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

690 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

512 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

500 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

HDR luminance chart:

LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A

HDR luminance

Philips PUS8209

HDR luminance

Unfortunately, this is where the problems begin. A maximum brightness of 280 nits is definitely too low to feel the true HDR effect. In practice, the image resembles standard SDR more, so it's hard to speak of deeper visual experiences. On the plus side, the color gamut coverage is commendable – 91.4% DCI-P3 is a result that will be sufficient for most films. It must also be noted that the image is stable and there are no issues with sudden changes in brightness or colors. Looking at the overall picture, HDR on this TV is more of a formality than an actual added value. If we are looking for true HDR emotions, this model may not meet expectations.

Against the backdrop of contrast and black, the brightness of the QNED86A and the overall HDR effect performs much better. This is a television that can reach around 700 nits in the best conditions, so in terms of brightness alone, there is nothing to be ashamed of. As a result, scenes with strong lights, explosions, flashes, or bright parts of the landscape look clear and can make an impression. Interestingly, even in more challenging moments with small, contrasting elements on the screen, the television handles their backlighting well, and the details are quite visible. The problem resurfaces when there are a lot of dark tones. The lack of effective local dimming causes black to virtually disappear, and instead, we get a gray glow spreading across the entire screen. This kills the sense of depth and makes the image look flat, as if it lacks a cinematic quality. In bright animations or colorful family films, this won't be an issue because colors and bright light dominate there. But in horrors or productions set in darkness, these limitations are very palpable. As a consolation, it’s worth mentioning that the QNED86A is actually a QLED television with a PFS LED filter, which gives it very good coverage of wide color gamuts. Both the DCI-P3 palette and the wider BT.2020 perform really solid here. This ensures that colors in HDR films are saturated, vibrant, and have the right depth – even if the black itself disappoints, the colors can save the viewing experience and make the image look attractive.

Factory color reproduction

6/10

5.6/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

Philips PUS8209 offers many picture modes, but the best among them, without a doubt, is the Filmmaker mode. Despite its proud name, it has its clear issues. In the case of HD content, the white balance is characterized by a strong dominance of red, causing the image to be significantly warmer than it should be in reality. The brightness characteristic (gamma), although correct in the midtones, has serious problems at the beginning and end of the graph. Drops in the shadows lead to a loss of details in dark areas, and highlights in bright areas make some elements look unnatural.

For high-quality 4K HDR content, the situation reverses. In this case, blue dominates, leading to an effect of artificial image enhancement, reminiscent of unnatural store settings. Such an image looks unappealing and inconsistent with the creators' intentions. An additional problem is the EOTF curve, responsible for brightness in HDR materials. It deviates significantly from the reference chart, making the image appear too dark, robbing the depth and detail of HDR content.

Against this background, the errors in the Color Checker test and deviations in color palette reproduction are exceptionally large, which negatively impacts the overall image quality. The Filmmaker mode, although the best among the available options, requires significant corrections to fully deliver the director's vision.

We primarily tested the QNED86A in Filmmaker mode, which is designed to provide the most accurate picture. Unfortunately, right out of the box, there were quite a few shortcomings. The most noticeable issue was the poorly adjusted white balance – there was a lack of blue, causing the overall image to lean slightly yellow, and at times, even orange. An even bigger problem turned out to be the way the television manages brightness. Due to its technical limitations – namely, local dimming that only works along the edges of the screen – the QNED86A tends to over-brighten entire scenes. This is where the flattening effect we mentioned earlier comes from. Instead of distinct depth and contrast, we get something akin to "boosted brightness," which can strain the eye over time.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.3/10

7.6/10

After calibration, the white balance for HD and 4K content has improved significantly. Although we did not achieve a perfectly flat characteristic, the effect is definitely better than before. The image on the television no longer appears artificially warm or overly cold, which significantly enhances the naturalness of the displayed content. The brightness characteristic (gamma) has also been adjusted - the biggest issues at the beginning and end of the graph have been mitigated. The EOTF curve, which is responsible for brightness in 4K HDR material, has been stabilized, eliminating problems with excessive dimming of the image. In the color palette test, some imperfections can still be seen due to average coverage of a wide color gamut, which is a limitation of the hardware itself. Nevertheless, the final effect is clearly better than before calibration - the image looks more natural and approaches the expectations for the Filmmaker mode.

What was saved in the QNED86A6A is undoubtedly the colors. After calibration, the white balance was set with great precision, resulting in deviations on the Colour Checker palette mostly not exceeding the threshold of visibility for the human eye. In other words – the colors finally looked natural, without strange yellow or orange tones that previously ruined the experience. Unfortunately, even the best calibration cannot bypass design limitations. The already mentioned very modest number of local dimming zones and their unfortunate placement made the analysis of the EOTF curve in films still show clear over-brightening of scenes. The image tended to flatten, lacking cinematic depth. Fortunately, this effect is not as noticeable in older productions or SDR content. There, calibration really does its job and allows taming the QNED in such a way that the image can be pleasing. However, the specifics of this design – especially the contrast issues – cannot be entirely overcome.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

6.5/10

8.9/10

Philips PUS8209 presents a decent gradation in bright scenes, where tonal transitions are smooth enough not to be distracting. Unfortunately, in darker scenes, such as red water, the television clearly struggles. Issues with blending shades and a lack of precision in reproducing subtle color differences are very noticeable here.

The blending of colors is one of the stronger points of the QNED86A. In everyday viewing, the image appears really smooth, without noticeable "steps" or sudden transitions between colors. The television handles color blending quite naturally, so with most materials, it's hard to spot issues with gradation. Any imperfections only appear in extreme conditions – for example, in the darkest scenes of movies, where even much more expensive televisions can have problems. There, you might notice slight banding or characteristic stripes, but these are marginal situations that shouldn't interfere with normal usage. Overall, the QNED86A performs well in this category and has nothing to be ashamed of compared to the competition.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5.5/10

7.8/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

The television offers a "Distortion Reduction" feature that effectively improves the gradation of tonal transitions, especially when set to the minimum level. Unfortunately, it comes at a price – the feature also smooths out details like the texture of materials. On the plus side, the operation of this option does not negatively affect the film grain, which remains intact.

As for image scaling (upscaling), the television generates a plastic, soft image that generally looks pleasant. However, in the background, one can sometimes notice issues with aliasing on some elements, such as branches or fine details, which can lower the quality of the reception. Despite these minor imperfections, the overall experience of scaling is satisfactory.

If someone is worried about possible "steps" when connecting colors, there is a simple way in the QNED86A. Just turn on the feature called Smooth Gradation and set it to medium level. Then the TV really smooths out all those unwanted transitions – especially in older productions – and does it in such a way that the film grain doesn't disappear, nor do strange artifacts appear. In other words, you can use it without worry.

The upscaling itself also turns out quite well. Of course, there are no miracles here – with lower quality sources, you can observe characteristic jaggedness. Fortunately, there is a sharpness slider in the menu, and if someone prefers a more "softer" image, it can be quickly adjusted to their taste.

Blur and motion smoothness

3.8/10

7.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
120Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
No
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
62%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

The 60 Hz panel in the Philips PUS8209 is mainly suited for watching movies, but there is also a certain sense of dissatisfaction here. The TV does not offer any motion smoothing feature that would allow adjusting the smoothness of the picture to individual preferences, which may be disappointing for some users.

The QNED86A is equipped with a 120 Hz refresh rate panel, so right from the start, it's safe to say that it's suitable for both sports and gaming. And indeed, this is true – the image looks smooth, and motion blur is not very noticeable. IPS panels have always had some issues with this, and you can sometimes notice slight blurring here as well, especially in very dynamic scenes, but it's not something that ruins watching a match or a fast-paced game. For movie and sports fans, LG has added the traditional TruMotion smoother. In the menu, we have two sliders – one for movies (De-Judder), the other for sports (De-Blur). The first adds missing frames and allows you to adjust the character of motion – from raw, cinematic to more fluid, "theatrical." The second enhances sharpness during dynamic actions, so it's worth turning it up a bit if you're watching a lot of sports.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 120Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The Philips PUS8209 offers basic functions useful for gamers, such as variable refresh rate (VRR), automatic low latency mode (ALLM), and a Game Bar that makes managing settings easier.

Unfortunately, due to the 60 Hz panel, the television will not meet the expectations of more demanding gamers who are counting on higher fluidity and precision of the image. Additionally, this model does not support any HDR mode dedicated to games, such as HGiG or Dolby Vision, which further limits its capabilities in this regard.

In terms of gaming, the LG QNED86A6A is a complete tool. It features four HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gb/s, which means that whether you connect a PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X, or a powerful PC – everything will work at full 4K 120 Hz with support for all features. This is a big plus, as some competitors still have only two such ports, which can be problematic with a larger number of devices. It also has VRR, or variable refresh rate, which eliminates screen tearing, and ALLM, which automatically activates game mode when the console is turned on. There’s also Dolby Vision Gaming and a proper implementation of the HGiG format, so titles supporting these formats look more vivid and detailed. Added to all of this is the Game Optimizer – a kind of control center for the gamer. From this level, you can view image parameters in real-time, quickly change modes, activate additional features, or adjust image settings to your preferences. The LG QNED86A6A essentially has everything one can expect from a modern gaming television.

Input lag

10/10

9.9/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
15 ms
1080p120
6 ms
2160p60
13 ms
14 ms
2160p120
6 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
14 ms
2160p120
6 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
15 ms
2160p120 DV
6 ms

Input lag in the Philips PUS8209 is one of its strongest points. With a value of around 13 ms, the TV provides a very quick response time, which should satisfy most gamers, both casual and more advanced. Such a result allows for comfortable gameplay even in dynamic games.

There's really nothing to complain about here. The QNED86A6A achieves excellent results – around 5 ms for 120 Hz content and about 15 ms for 60 Hz. These are values that will easily satisfy both console gamers and those who connect a PC to the TV. The response to movements is instantaneous, so you can forget about delays between the image and the action on the controller.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

8/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
13ms
6ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGB
Max refresh rate
60Hz
120Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

On paper, collaboration with a PC seems promising, especially with support for chroma 4:4:4, which should ensure good font readability and detail reproduction. In practice, however, the television has significant issues displaying text, especially on dark backgrounds, where the so-called pixelation is clearly visible, negatively affecting work comfort.

Additionally, the lack of support for technologies such as G-Sync means that gameplay smoothness when connected to a PC leaves much to be desired, making this model less attractive for users looking for a television for gaming on a computer.

The LG QNED86A, thanks to its IPS matrix, full RGB subpixel layout, and correct implementation of chroma 4:4:4, makes fonts look stunning. Text is sharp, clear, and legible, making this TV great for office work. This is important because this year the model is also debuting in a 43" size, and such a variant can comfortably land on a desk and serve as a large monitor. Of course, some users who opt for the 43" will be gamers, and there are also no complaints here. The TV supports 4K at 120 Hz, so gameplay is smooth and enjoyable. It’s a bit of a shame that there's no higher refresh rate mode like the 144Hz declared by the manufacturer, as PC gamers would surely appreciate that. Nevertheless, the QNED86A6A performs really well as a monitor for gaming and work.

Viewing angles

2.1/10

6.9/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
87%
61%

The viewing angles on the Philips PUS8209 are weak, which is typical for VA matrices. When viewing at an angle, the brightness of the image decreases significantly, and the colors lose their depth, which can significantly affect viewing comfort, especially in larger groups or in an unusual setup of the television relative to the viewer.

QNED86A6A performs very well in this regard. The IPS panel used here ensures that the image retains its brightness and color saturation even when viewed at an angle. There is no fading effect that often appears in cheaper TVs with VA panels. Of course, there is no comparison to the level offered by organic panels, where colors and contrast hold up perfectly at almost any angle. But for an LCD TV, it is definitely one of the better results and is easily sufficient for watching movies or sports together on the couch with a larger group.

TV efficiency during daytime

4.4/10

5.8/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Average
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A: 462 cd/m2

Philips PUS8209: 277 cd/m2

The Philips PUS8209 is equipped with a satin coating on the panel, which only moderately suppresses reflections, which may be insufficient in brightly lit rooms. However, the biggest problem is the low brightness of 280 nits. In practice, this means that watching content during the day, especially in bright sunlight, can be challenging, as the image appears too dark to ensure comfortable use.

QNED86A6A is not a brightness master, but it manages just fine. Thanks to the moderately high brightness of the panel and quite decent glare reduction, the television performs well in typical, moderately lit living rooms. The image remains clear, and colors do not lose their intensity in daylight. However, let’s not kid ourselves; this is not a screen that will handle extremely bright conditions, where sunlight pours in through huge windows and floods the room.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
PFS LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
TPN246E_V246.004.147.081
33.20.74
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

TV features

4.7/10

8.4/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    No
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes

Philips PUS8209 uses the Titan OS operating system, which, although easy to use, remains limited in terms of functionality. The number of available applications is small compared to more developed ecosystems such as Google TV, which may disappoint users accustomed to broader capabilities. Additionally, the lack of support for AirPlay limits collaboration with Apple devices, reducing the TV's flexibility in streaming content. The remote, although interesting, requires pointing at the screen, which may not appeal to everyone.

The absence of more advanced features like PiP (Picture-in-Picture) or program recording further limits the device's capabilities in everyday use.

Philips PUS8209 is a television that attracts attention with an interesting solution in the form of a three-sided Ambilight system, which dynamically lights up the wall behind the TV, adjusting its colors and intensity to the content displayed on the screen. This effect creates a sense of greater depth of image and enhances immersion, especially in darkened rooms. Unfortunately, its potential is limited by the Titan OS operating system, which leaves much to be desired. The limited number of applications and lack of support for popular features like AirPlay can be a significant drawback for more demanding users. While Ambilight sets this model apart from the competition, deficiencies in the operating system significantly impact the overall functionality of the television.

Smart Features: webOS

QNED86A6A runs on the well-known webOS – a system that has been a strong point of LG TVs for years. Everything operates quickly and stably, and apps launch without significant delays, though the interface can be somewhat overwhelmed by advertisements at times. Fortunately, the convenience is more noticeable in daily use than the shortcomings. A significant advantage is the Magic Remote, which allows you to control the cursor like a mouse – it's one of those features that you can easily get used to and later find hard to give up. The new version of the remote is slimmer as it has been stripped of the numeric keypad. Some will appreciate the simplicity, while others will miss the classic set of buttons; it's more a matter of habit.

Classic Features

Onboard, there are also a few solutions that are not always obvious in 2025. There is the ability to record programs from built-in DVB-T2 tuners onto USB, so you can calmly return to a match or series at any moment. In the evening, Bluetooth headphone support will come in handy – especially if someone in the house falls asleep faster than we do. Additionally, there is a full set of HDMI 2.1 ports with eARC support and audio formats like Dolby Digital and Dolby Atmos.

Playing files from USB

8/10

8.9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the Philips PUS8209 performs well in everyday use. It handles Polish characters in subtitles without any issues and allows for adjustments to the color and size of the font, which significantly improves the comfort of using this feature. More demanding users may notice some shortcomings in the supported file formats, but for most applications in everyday use, this player should be fully sufficient.

The built-in media player in the QNED86A6A performs quite well with the most popular audio and video formats. During testing, we had no trouble playing MP4, MKV, or MP3 files; everything played smoothly without glitches. The TV also handled most images, although here we encountered a typical barrier for many manufacturers – the lack of full support for the HEIC format from Apple. So, if you regularly use an iPhone and store photos in this standard, you'll need to convert them beforehand or, preferably, transfer them using AirPlay. Other than that, it's hard to find fault as the built-in solution is really decent.

Apps

6.2/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
No
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Sound

5/10

6/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    84dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The sound in the Philips PUS8209 can be described as average, typical for televisions in this price range. The 2x10 W speakers do not offer exceptional quality or depth, but they are sufficient for everyday TV viewing. A positive aspect is the wide range of supported audio codecs, such as Dolby Atmos and DTS, which can significantly enhance audio quality in conjunction with external sound systems like soundbars or home theater setups.

In terms of sound, the QNED86A6A performs quite decently, but let's not hide it – this is not the level that will impress home cinema enthusiasts. The sound is clean and clear, dialogues are easily heard, but overall it sounds rather flat and there is definitely a lack of solid bass. For everyday watching of television, streaming services, or news, this is an acceptable level; however, if you plan to watch movies or play games more often, even a basic soundbar will make a significant difference.

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

84dBC (Max)

75dBC