Philips PUS8079 vs TCL C8L / QM8L

Direct comparison

C8L / QM8L

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”98”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

4.6

8.3

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.3

    7.7

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    4.9

    7.5

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.5

    7.2

  • Gaming on console

    6.2

    8.9

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    2.6

    10.0

  • Utility functions

    4.7

    8.3

  • Apps

    6.7

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    5.1

    8.1

Advantages

  • Unique Ambilight system

  • Great fluidity of tonal transitions

  • Low input lag values

  • Good built-in file player

  • Support for DTS audio

  • Very deep blacks, Mini-LED backlighting

  • High peak brightness, results reaching nearly 5,000 nits

  • Excellent daytime performance, the powerful backlight easily cuts through reflections on the panel

  • Very good colors, new SQD quantum dots

  • Pentonic 800 processor, a noticeable quality jump in upscaling and the performance of digital features

  • Four full HDMI 2.1 ports

  • Great specs for gamers, extremely low input lag (below 10 ms), up to 288 Hz refresh with VRR, and support for HGiG and Dolby Vision Gaming

  • Google TV, the system runs fast and allows installation of a large number of apps

  • Good sound, audio branded by premium Bang & Olufsen

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low display brightness

  • Missing Dolby Vision

  • IR remote - requires aiming at the screen

  • TitanOs system - limited number of applications

  • Lack of creative fidelity: the TV tends to boost brightness.

  • Slight ghosting

Our verdict

The Philips PUS8079 is the brand's most affordable model featuring the multicoloured Ambilight backlighting, which has a dedicated fanbase. Given its budget price, this is a significant advantage. However, with a lower budget, certain compromises are to be expected. This TV is particularly suited for those who primarily watch content during the day. The main drawback is the contrast, which for a VA panel is quite low, and the luminance hovers around 200 nits, making it unsuitable for high-quality HDR content. However, there are notable positives. The tonal fidelity is relatively high, especially for content within the TV's capabilities, and the smooth gradation is impressive—hard to criticise. For casual gaming, low input lag is a plus. The operating system, though simple and sufficient for basic streaming like YouTube and Netflix, may fall short for users requiring more functionality. In conclusion, the Philips PUS8079 is ideal for those seeking an affordable TV with Ambilight, especially for daytime viewing, but may not be the best choice for high-end content or those seeking a more robust OS.

TCL C8L is undoubtedly one of the most intriguing Mini-LED TVs to come into our lab this year. This model stands out primarily due to its excellent price-to-capability ratio. TCL has accustomed us to aggressive pricing of its screens, but in the case of the C8 series, the manufacturer has managed to push the boundaries even further. For the amount that often allows just the purchase of mid-range models or two models like the C8K with market competitors, here we receive features and specifications equal to those of top models. A new image processor, four full HDMI 2.1 ports, support for extreme refresh rates, and impressive peak brightness thanks to a massive number of dimming zones are arguments that are hard to overlook.

However, analyzing the whole picture, we must honestly summarize the character of this TV. The C8L is a device created more for displaying "impressive" images rather than rigorously faithful ones. What do we mean by that? The software and algorithms managing the Mini-LED backlight zones have been tuned to prioritize spectacle – the image is meant to be bright, contrasty, and strikingly saturated. And what does this mean? The TV tends to interpret images autonomously rather than adhering to certain studio standards. For most users looking for "greater" emotions in movies or games, this effect will likely be an advantage. On the other hand, purists and fans of perfectly natural images (like us 😉) may consider this behavior too aggressive and not in line with the director's intent. Therefore, we leave the final assessment on this issue to you.

Overall, despite this specificity, the TCL C8L is a TV that we can, and indeed must, recommend wholeheartedly. It is primarily a premium-class product that does literally everything correctly... to the point of being painful. We would regard certain imperfections simply as characteristics of this device rather than flaws – mainly due to the technological limitations that all Mini-LED TVs from every manufacturer on the market have accustomed us to. Ultimately, the software refinement has given the new eight a great deal, making it a mature, confident, and nearly complete device.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Premium
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Silver
Stand
Fixed
Height adjustment
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

4.3/10

8/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 2040 (34 x 60)

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,750:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,550:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,150:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,350:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,350:1

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Contrast and black detail

Result

156,600:1

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Contrast and black detail

Result

59,250:1

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Contrast and black detail

Result

17,400:1

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Contrast and black detail

Result

23,650:1

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Contrast and black detail

Result

9,250:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The Philips PUS8079 is equipped with a VA panel, and the size tested was 43". It's important to note that the manufacturer may change the panel type depending on the screen size. While a VA panel typically provides good black levels, the performance here is predictable given the TV's budget price. With a contrast ratio of around 2300:1, this is one of the lowest results for a VA panel, as more advanced units can achieve 2-3 times better results in this regard. As expected for such an affordable device, the backlighting is direct (Direct), offering uniform illumination but lacking zone division, which is typical for low-end models. One positive point is the light separation observed in the test with the movie "Oblivion." However, this advantage fades when watching "Revenant," where the picture quality drastically drops, leaving the scene looking flat and disappointing. Ultimately, while the Philips PUS8079 offers basic features for its price, it falls short of being a viable option for home cinema enthusiasts.

The C8L model cannot be denied one thing: impressive specifications. In the 65-inch variant we tested, the manufacturer packed in as many as 2040 independent local dimming zones (this number obviously increases or decreases with the screen size). Such a dense packing of light points has a direct impact on black depth. The contrast we measured in movie scenes reached impressive five- and six-digit values to one, which is a remarkable result in the LCD world. Is the algorithm perfect? Not entirely. On small, bright elements displayed on a dark background, the trained eye can still notice a slight halo effect and moments when zones come to life, which is a natural feature of Mini-LED technology. Interestingly, in our test scene with the helicopter, the background was noticeably brighter than on competing screens. Unfortunately, TCL has a specific way of manipulating the brightness curve, artificially boosting some scenes, which we do not have full control over from the device menu. This is an evident issue with this model that needs to be taken into account. That said, the black level on this model will be more than satisfactory for most viewers.

HDR effect quality

2.9/10

7.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 80.0%, Bt.2020: 59.0%
DCI P3: 97.4%, Bt.2020: 90.3%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

179 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

177 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

164 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Brightness measurement

Result

1637 nit

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Brightness measurement

Result

701 nit

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Brightness measurement

Result

1428 nit

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Brightness measurement

Result

405 nit

Review TCL C8L / QM8L  Brightness measurement

Result

1728 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

TCL C8L / QM8L

Philips PUS8079

The Philips PUS8079 has a maximum brightness of just 202 nits in content with a wide tonal range, which is very low and makes it unsuitable for streaming movies and series in the highest quality. Additionally, using HDR with dynamic metadata doesn’t improve the situation, as the only HDR format available on this model is HDR10+, which is rare and has limited content support. The TV also uses WLED backlighting, which is not optimal and results in only 80% coverage of the DCI-P3 wide colour gamut. This limits the intensity of colours in HDR content.

In terms of HDR, the TCL C8L turns out to be a hellishly bright television – and I mean literally. On a synthetic chart of 5%, our measuring equipment indicated a result exceeding 4500 nits. This is a result that is downright cosmic, considering that reference director monitors, which we often refer to in our materials, typically operate around 4000 nits. Does this mean that the C8L breaks barriers and climbs to the technological peak of Mini-LED? Not exactly. Dry synthetic tests are one thing, and real movie images are another. In real, varied scenes, the C8L achieves a peak of around 1600 nits. This is still a very good result, ensuring a very high level of HDR dynamics, but also clearly lower than what the manufacturer boasts in the specifications. The trouble starts with very small flashes of light – then brightness can drastically drop to around 600 nits. The algorithm tries at all costs to maintain deep black and minimize halo effect, but it does so at the expense of HDR impact. This is perfect evidence that laboratory charts rarely correspond to what we ultimately see on the screen.

Huge applause is due for color reproduction, all thanks to the new generation of SQD (Super Quantum Dot) quantum dots. The coverage of the DCI-P3 palette reaches 97%, but the true jaw-dropper is the measurement of the extremely demanding BT.2020 space. The C8L achieves as much as 90% in it, placing it alongside today's top screens that boast RGB backlighting. Importantly, unlike some screens with Micro/Mini RGB backlighting, this effect is stable regardless of the scene displayed. Of course, one must remember that content mastered for such a wide gamut in films or series is still a rarity. However, the mere fact that the panel has such a "color reserve" deserves immense admiration.

Factory color reproduction

1.8/10

5.3/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

The best factory mode for colour reproduction and fidelity to the director's vision on the Philips PUS8079 was the "Film" mode. However, this setting displayed significant discrepancies between the filmmaker's intent and the actual output. In both SDR and HDR materials (with HDR being less affected), the white balance was off, showing a blue tint similar to store displays, rather than pure whites. When it came to SDR materials, gamma was notably lowered, cutting into the already limited contrast and brightening the overall image. The EOTF curve in HDR content also showed a significant drop below the reference line, making HDR materials appear even darker. The colour accuracy in both SDR and HDR modes was poor, with high deltaE values indicating that the colours were far from their intended representation.

We tested the TCL C8L in the best factory picture mode available in this TV’s menu for image fidelity. That, of course, is Filmmaker Mode, which appeared in this brand’s software relatively recently (a year ago in the "K" series). Thanks to it, an average user can get a pretty good color reproduction straight out of the box, although it is certainly not a perfectly tuned mode. Looking at the factory white balance of our unit, both in SDR and HDR material, the red component was clearly lacking, which made the image noticeably cooler and caused a slight shift toward bluish-green tints. The issue of brightness management is also ambiguous, as we mentioned earlier. While for SDR content the gamma linearity is actually correct and holds steadily at the reference value of 2.4, in HDR things look much worse. Tracking the EOTF curve clearly shows the TV has a significantly boosted brightness across the range, which can make the final image overly bright and inconsistent with the creators’ intent, and that in a mode that by definition should avoid that. Of course, like every sample in our lab, this one also underwent professional calibration, and its results are shown below.

Color reproduction after calibration

4.8/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Fortunately, Philips incorporates advanced image correction tools across its televisions. SDR content benefited the most from these adjustments, with significant improvements in deltaE errors, white balance, and gamma. While the image still isn’t perfect, it is much more watchable, making it easier on the eyes during movie or series viewing. HDR content, however, was more challenging due to the television’s low luminance. While the EOTF curve and white balance improved, the corrections weren’t as effective as with SDR materials. It’s important to note that each unit may have different errors, some larger and some smaller, but the adjustments made were a step in the right direction.

As you can see, the results of a professional calibration of the TCL C8L are really promising, thanks to the extensive adjustment tools the manufacturer put at our disposal in the menu. Above all, we were able to completely correct the white balance — we eliminated the red deficiency, so the image finally stopped drifting toward unwanted cool tones. After that adjustment, errors in the ColorChecker test fell to near-reference levels, regularly landing below a Delta E of 2, which is below the threshold of human perception.

If the test patterns look this perfect, you might ask: why then the lower final score in this category? The answer lies in the brightness management discussed earlier. Although the menu includes sliders that let you precisely straighten the EOTF curve on synthetic signals, when confronted with actual movie material (I recommend enabling the EOTF filter when watching movies), you can see that in most scenarios the TV still reacts to HDR metadata its own way. As a result, the picture can be slightly over-brightened and not faithful to the creators' intent, and it was precisely this lack of consistency with real films that cost the C8L a few points.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

9/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The tested television excels in the smoothness of tonal transitions, performing admirably in nearly every scene. While there are slight shortcomings in darker areas, particularly near blacks, the overall performance remains impressive, especially considering the device’s affordability.

One noticeable drawback, however, is the visible backlight bleed in the corners, a common issue with panels in budget-friendly models. Despite this, the television’s strong performance in tonal transitions significantly outweighs this minor flaw, making it a compelling option for its price range.

The smoothness of tonal transitions on the C8L is nearly exemplary. A well-tuned panel combined with the processing algorithms means the TV handles posterization, the ugly, layered banding where individual shades separate, very well. Subtle, minimal errors and slight imperfections in gradation are noticeable only in extremely dark, demanding scenes. However, overall, when watching high-quality content at native resolution, transitions between colors are extremely smooth and natural.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.3/10

8/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Let us revisit the topic of tonal transitions, this time in the context of overall image quality enhancement. As shown in the photo on the left, the gradation improvement feature delivers excellent results. It provides multiple settings, each offering noticeable benefits without softening the film grain effect. Once again, it must be emphasised that this feature is the standout advantage of the tested television.

On the other hand, the television’s performance in image scaling leaves much to be desired. Fine details often appear heavily jagged, with a noticeable white halo around figures. Additionally, the significant artificial sharpening detracts from the overall image quality.

This year the C8 series and higher models received probably the biggest and most anticipated upgrade in TCL’s history, and it specifically concerns digital image processing. The C8L is the lowest-end model in the manufacturer's lineup to be equipped with the latest flagship chip, the MediaTek Pentonic 800 (listed in the menu as MT9655). Thanks to its processing power, the feature called "Gradual Smoothing" finally works as it should. The algorithm effectively eliminates unwanted posterization (ugly tonal transitions/color banding), doing so intelligently enough that it does not degrade the sharpness of other details.

The processor also handles upscaling lower-resolution content to 4K very well. Although evaluating this element can be mostly academic, because the differences between today's TVs in this class are very subtle. The most important takeaway is that TCL finally has nothing to be ashamed of compared to the competition.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.2/10

7.7/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
BFI function 120Hz
No
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
32%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur ():

Blur (1080p@288Hz):

This paragraph will be notably brief due to the absence of even basic motion-smoothing functionality, which is unsurprising given the device's budget-oriented nature. The VA panel used here is not known for exceptional sharpness and is instead associated with high contrast and slower response times, as confirmed by the matrix analysis results. Photos captured during fast motion reveal typical motion blur for this type of panel. While not ideal, the television could be conditionally suitable for watching sports, though viewers should expect less-than-optimal motion clarity. Additionally, films may exhibit noticeable stuttering due to the lack of any motion-smoothing features, even basic ones.

The TCL C8L is equipped with a fast panel that has a native 144 Hz refresh rate. That spec will be most appreciated by demanding PC gamers, while most users, who rely on consoles or TV broadcasts, will use a steady 120 Hz. It is at 120 Hz that motion processing algorithms handle image rendering for movies, series, and sports. In the TV’s menu you’ll find a "Motion Clarity" option that lets you adjust the motion smoothing to your preferences. The algorithms handle cinematic material at 24 or 30 frames per second (fps) as well as dynamic sports broadcasts at 50 or 60 fps, maintaining appropriate smoothness.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 288Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The Philips PUS8079 provides only basic gaming features, including ALLM, VRR, and a Game Bar. The key highlight is the inclusion of dynamic frequency adjustment, which ensures a smooth image with minimal screen tearing—an impressive offering for this price range.

A notable benefit for gamers is the presence of the Game Bar, allowing adjustments to be made "on the fly" without needing to exit the game. Importantly, this feature retains options found in higher-end models, such as shadow enhancement for improved visibility in darker areas and a colour filter designed to assist gamers with visual impairments.

For gamers – especially for those with powerful PCs and several consoles at the same time – the TCL C8L is a true beast. It’s the first model in the manufacturer’s lineup equipped with four full HDMI 2.1 ports with a maximum bandwidth of 48 Gbps. This is directly thanks to the new Pentonic 800 processor we wrote about earlier. Additionally, the TV seamlessly supports virtually every gaming feature. It has an automatic game mode (ALLM) that reduces latency to minimal levels and full frame synchronization (VRR) operating in an impressive range of up to 288 Hz. We’re also talking about standards like G-Sync or FreeSync from Nvidia and AMD. When it comes to image display standards, there are also no compromises: the C8L offers complete support for HDR formats in games, including gaming Dolby Vision and the HGiG profile. All of these features can be conveniently managed from a very readable game bar (Game Bar), which we can customize according to our preferences. From a purely gaming perspective, there really isn’t anything to complain about in the C8L – well, maybe aside from the previously mentioned slight ghosting. But other than that? It’s an unflawed machine for gamers.

Input lag

9.9/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
14 ms
14 ms
1080p120
8 ms
2160p60
14 ms
13 ms
2160p120
8 ms

HDR

2160p60
14 ms
13 ms
2160p120
8 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
13 ms
2160p120 DV
8 ms

The results of the input lag measurements in PUS8079 are at a high level, regardless of the signal or resolution. All gamers will certainly appreciate the manufacturer's efforts, as a game running at 4K60Hz with HDR will have only 13 ms of latency, which is practically unnoticeable even in online games.

In laboratory tests we measured input lag at under 10 ms. For a gamer that means a completely imperceptible delay. Importantly, this result can be improved further by forcing the PC to use a refresh rate above 120 Hz. We also give high marks to Dolby Vision Game mode, where the lag is just as low as in standard SDR or HDR10 modes.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
14ms
7ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGB
Max refresh rate
60Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

When connecting the Philips PUS8079 to a computer to use it as a monitor, it delivers a low input lag of 14 ms, which is barely noticeable in terms of mouse-screen-eye interaction. However, the television falls short in font clarity, making it unsuitable for use as a monitor. The issue lies in the phenomenon known as dithering, which becomes apparent in the display of grey text. Not all subpixels are lit on adjacent pixels as they should be, resulting in blurry text that severely impacts readability and makes extended work impractical.

The TCL C8L is very well suited as a large-format monitor. The TV supports refresh rates up to 288 Hz at Full HD resolution, which will be appreciated by fans of esports titles and owners of less powerful graphics cards in AAA games. The TV also works seamlessly with frame-synchronization technologies AMD FreeSync and NVIDIA G-Sync. Importantly for text work, the C8L renders most fonts correctly and legibly. At very close range you can notice minimal errors in the rendering of letter edges and a slight graininess around them, but the issue disappears entirely (or rather becomes much less noticeable) once you sit at a normal, recommended viewing distance.

Viewing angles

3.8/10

4.5/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
41%
74%

One of the most notable and frequent drawbacks of VA panels is their limited viewing angles, especially in models without angular coatings that could improve performance in this area. Interestingly, the Philips PUS8079 performed somewhat better in this regard compared to the PML9009 we recently tested. However, even with this slight improvement, a small deviation from the centre still leads to noticeable colour degradation and a significant reduction in contrast.

TCL C8L uses a VA-type panel, which by nature is not known for wide viewing angles. In this case, however, the manufacturer used TCL CSOT's proprietary WHVA 2.0 panel. As a result, viewing angles are significantly better than those of average VA panels, which is definitely a plus. Colors and contrast do not degrade as drastically when moving slightly off-axis as they do on most LCD screens. Overall, it's still a level below IPS panels, and even more so below OLED displays, but for a VA LCD panel the improvement is quite noticeable.

Daytime performance

2.6/10

10/10

Panel finish
Satin
Glare
Reflection suppression
Poor
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

TCL C8L / QM8L : 1651 cd/m2

Philips PUS8079: 192 cd/m2

During our test sequence, we also evaluated the television’s performance in daytime viewing conditions, which we recommend given the insufficient contrast for darker environments. Unfortunately, the results were disappointing. The satin coating didn't help much, and combined with the television's low luminance, this effectively rules it out for use in a bright, sunny room.

The TCL C8L is one of the brightest TVs we've tested so far. As you can see from the brightness chart (or rather, you might not), its peak brightness reaches a cosmic 5,000 nits (exactly 4,862)! Although with a full-screen white image that value drops to around 600 nits, the TV's overall daytime performance lets us confidently say it's an almost perfect screen for very bright, sunlit living rooms. While the glossy panel used here doesn't suppress reflections as aggressively as matte screens, the display's enormous brightness can cut through most unwanted reflections from windows or other artificial light sources such as lamps.

Panel details

Backlight Type
White LED
Mini-LED Super QLED (SQD)
Software version during testing
TPN246E_V246.004.012.161
V8-0015T01-LF1V080.000644
Image processor
mt9655 2,5GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Philips PUS8079 TV Panel details
Review TCL C8L / QM8L TV Panel details

Philips PUS8079

TCL C8L / QM8L

TV features

4.7/10

8.3/10

  • System
    Titan OS
    Google TV
  • System performance
    Poor
    Very good
  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    No
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Philips PUS8079 TV features
Review Philips PUS8079 TV features
Review TCL C8L / QM8L  TV features
Review TCL C8L / QM8L  TV features
Review TCL C8L / QM8L  TV features
Review TCL C8L / QM8L  TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    Yes
    No
  • Font size adjustment
    No
    Yes
  • Audio description
    No
    Yes

One of the standout features of Philips televisions is, without a doubt, the multicoloured Ambilight backlighting. Positioned on the back of the device, this system displays colours that adjust to what’s happening on screen, creating a more immersive viewing experience. The operating system, TitanOS, powers the television, but it is more closed and limited compared to Google TV-based models from the brand. A significant drawback is the lack of essential apps, such as Apple TV, MAX, Canal+, or Player. Additionally, TitanOS' closed nature restricts basic functions like programming recordings or recording to USB. Apple device users may also be disappointed by the absence of AirPlay, which allows easy screen streaming. On the plus side, it’s possible to connect a keyboard and mouse for smoother navigation through the menu. While headphones can be connected, they must be wired, and sound can also be played through the TV’s speakers. Another inconvenience is that the TV uses IR for control instead of Bluetooth, which feels outdated in today’s tech landscape.

In summary: TitanOs has quite a few "buts," especially for individuals who use many streaming platforms. Instead, it is an option for those who limit themselves to the so-called holy trinity of Netflix, YouTube, and CDA.

SmartTV: Google TV

Online you can still come across older opinions about TCL where users complained about slow performance or occasional freezes of the Google TV interface. With the C8L model, however, there's a big step forward. Thanks to a new processor and some fixes, Google TV's stability and speed are at a very high level. We can easily compare the system's operation to closed systems like Tizen or webOS found in competing flagship models. On board it comes with a full package of features, led by the updated Gemini voice system.

TV features

For typical TV-related matters the C8L simply reliably fulfills its role as a television 😉. You'll find classic, standard solutions here, such as a Bluetooth module for smooth pairing of wireless headphones and the still-present teletext for the built-in tuners. However, it's clearly a model designed primarily for modern streaming platforms. One sign of this is the minimalist, modern remote, which, unlike the cheaper C7L, lacks a traditional numeric keypad entirely.

Apps

6.7/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
No
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8/10

9.4/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The default media player on the Philips PUS8079 offers a broad range of capabilities but it has some limitations. It supports nearly all video formats, with notable exceptions like Dolby Vision and the less commonly used .asf format. However, it struggles with the H.265 HEVC codec at high bitrates and does not support .sub subtitle files, which are fairly popular. For photos, the player performs reasonably well, but it lacks support for certain resolutions and formats, such as HEIC, which is commonly used by Apple devices. In terms of audio, the player excels and cannot be faulted. Unfortunately, due to system limitations, there is no option to expand its functionality, so users are limited to the features provided by the manufacturer.

The built-in USB media player handles everyday tests without the slightest problems. It's good to see that the TV natively and smoothly opens even less common image formats, such as Apple's HEIC. We did encounter a few formats that the factory app couldn't handle, but with Google TV that's no barrier. A huge advantage of this system is the ability to install any third-party player (e.g., VLC) directly from Google Play, which often completely resolves file compatibility issues.

Sound

5.1/10

8.1/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    78dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

The best thing about the sound system in the Philips PUS8079 is that it is present. Unfortunately, there is virtually no midrange or bass, and the high frequencies are somewhat unpleasant. Interestingly, the television does include a full set of essential audio codecs, including Dolby Atmos and DTS-HD Master Audio, making it easy to connect to a home theatre system.

It might seem that in terms of sound the TCL C8L would perform exactly the same as last year’s C8K. After all, the Bang & Olufsen-branded 6.2.2 audio system is on board again, with the same power and the same system features, namely Beosonic technology. Nothing could be further from the truth. The new generation performed noticeably better in our listening tests. Why is that? To be honest, from a purely hardware standpoint we don't know, but it's clear on the graphs from our measurements. Maybe TCL simply managed to improve the speakers' behavior with a new software update and better speaker tuning and drive. But as we always say, they're still TV speakers. We believe anyone who wants to fully enjoy this TV's potential will still need to buy a good soundbar or a home theater system. The C8L offers full support for audio codecs like Dolby Atmos and the niche DTS. Only by connecting an external audio setup will you be able to get true, immersive spatial sound from movies or games and complement what you see on this TV.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

78dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy