Philips PUS7009 (IPS) vs XIAOMI A PRO 2025

Direct compare

Available screen sizes: 43”55”

Available screen sizes: 43”55”65”75”

Panel technology: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

Operating system: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel technology: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

Operating system: Google TV

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.5

5.6

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.8

    5.7

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.2

    6.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.4

    5.1

  • Gaming on console

    6.4

    6.2

  • TV as a computer monitor

    5.0

    1.0

  • Watching in bright light

    4.5

    3.8

  • Utility functions

    6.8

    6.5

  • Apps

    7.0

    10.0

  • Sound quality

    5.6

    6.0

Advantages

  • Good viewing angles (IPS) - much better than the VA matrix variant

  • The dynamic tone mapping function improves image quality in demanding scenes

  • Okay for casual gamers - VRR, ALLM, low input lag

  • Support for all popular audio formats, including Dolby and DTS

  • Good font readability when connected to a PC

  • Expanded Google TV operating system

  • Voice control in Polish

  • Good image processing

  • High native contrast

  • Attractive price

Disadvantages

No like
  • Poor blacks and weak contrast due to the use of an IPS panel

  • Very weak brightness (250 nits)

  • Poorly developed operating system - TitanOS

  • No support for Dolby Vision

  • No motion smoothing feature in movies

  • Low brightness

  • Poor font readability

  • The system can lag

Our verdict

Philips PUS7009 is a model that is best suited for simple, everyday use. Thanks to its IPS panel, it offers wide viewing angles, which means the picture looks good even if we are not sitting directly in front of it. This is equipment that will mainly work well for watching TV, browsing photos, or using basic apps. For gamers, PUS7009 has a few interesting options, such as ALLM, VRR, or Game Bar. It is not equipment for those who expect top-notch fluidity or quality, but it is entirely sufficient for occasional gaming on a console. A big plus is the readability of text – if someone plans to connect a computer and work with text, the TV performs quite well. When it comes to picture quality, it is not ideal. Blacks are rather gray, contrast is low, and brightness is limited. If we want to watch something in a brightly lit room, we may be disappointed. What about HDR? It's better to forget about it, as the lack of Dolby Vision support and limited technical capabilities mean that HDR content does not make a significant impression. The biggest downside is probably the TitanOS operating system. It has few applications and operates quite clumsily – sometimes it lags, and the interface can be irritating. If someone has previously used Android TV, TitanOS may seem like a step backward. Philips PUS7009 is a TV that will perform basic tasks well – watching TV, casual gaming, or browsing photos. However, if we care about good picture quality or an efficient operating system, it's better to look for another model. This is equipment for those who do not need fireworks but simply want a solid everyday TV.

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 is a device that caters to the needs of many basic users. As one of the most affordable QLED TVs available, it offers a good balance between price and quality. One of its standout features is the Google TV system, which provides seamless access to a variety of apps and multimedia content. The intuitive interface makes it easy to navigate popular streaming platforms such as Netflix and YouTube. Voice control in Polish adds further convenience, allowing users to issue commands without manually navigating menus. The completely wireless remote enhances usability, removing the need to aim directly at the TV.

In terms of picture quality, the TV delivers solid performance for everyday viewing. It handles tonal transitions smoothly and processes lower-quality materials effectively, resulting in a pleasing image for standard television programmes. However, its limited brightness may affect performance in brightly lit environments—an expected compromise in this price range. The inclusion of a basic motion smoother allows for adjustable fluidity in movies and series, making it suitable for less demanding viewers in terms of motion handling.

That said, the TV’s 60 Hz panel and lack of advanced features may limit its appeal for those seeking higher performance. Its low input lag will appeal to occasional gamers, but the device falls short for PC connectivity due to poor font clarity, which makes text work less enjoyable. Additionally, while the operating system offers extensive functionality, its responsiveness could be better.

Despite these shortcomings, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 remains a compelling choice for budget-conscious users seeking an affordable QLED TV with practical features and reliable performance for basic applications.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps

Where to buy

No links

No links

Contrast and black detail

3.1/10

5.9/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS7009 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,550:1

Review Philips PUS7009 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,650:1

Review Philips PUS7009 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,400:1

Review Philips PUS7009 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,650:1

Review Philips PUS7009 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,250:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,300:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,200:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,100:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

The Philips PUS7009 television, available in 43" and 55" variants, is equipped with an IPS panel, which unfortunately does not support achieving deep blacks. The results are exceptionally poor, and the television simply does not meet expectations in this regard. Due to the limitations of the panel, blacks resemble more shades of gray, which makes the picture quality in darker scenes leave much to be desired. For this reason, we do not recommend this model for watching at night with the lights off, as the lack of proper contrast spoils the experience of movie screenings. It is possible that the situation could be improved by the Ambilight system, which can trick perceived contrast, but unfortunately, it is not available in this model.

The Xiaomi A Pro features a VA panel, which provides significantly better black depth and colour intensity compared to IPS panels, particularly in low-light environments. Testing revealed a maximum contrast ratio of approximately 6000:1, which is a solid performance for its category. This high contrast allows for good separation of image elements in darker scenes, enhancing visual quality. For instance, in the film Oblivion, the TV excelled at distinguishing bright and dark areas, effectively elevating the viewing experience.

However, the lack of local dimming technology—a common limitation in this price range—becomes apparent in more demanding scenes. In films like The Revenant, where intricate shadow details are critical, the black levels lose their intensity, appearing closer to navy blue. Without dynamic dimming, parts of the image that should be deeply darkened remain faintly illuminated, which can diminish the overall impact of darker sequences.

Despite this limitation, the TV’s strong contrast performance makes it a good choice for viewers prioritising deep blacks and vibrant colours, provided their expectations align with the TV’s price bracket.

HDR effect quality

3.5/10

3.2/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 74.8%, Bt.2020: 54.5%
DCI P3: 92.0%, Bt.2020: 70.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS7009 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

237 nit

Review Philips PUS7009 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

216 nit

Review Philips PUS7009 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

281 nit

Review Philips PUS7009 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

230 nit

Review Philips PUS7009 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

268 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

205 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

220 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

243 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

213 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

237 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

HDR luminance chart:

XIAOMI A PRO 2025

Philips PUS7009 (IPS)

In terms of HDR quality, PUS7009 (IPS) performs very poorly. A brightness level of 250 nits does not allow for enjoyment of HDR effects, and the image resembles more of a standard SDR. There is no talk of dynamic effects or vivid bursts of light. The coverage of the DCI-P3 color palette is only 75%, which is definitely insufficient. The lack of full color coverage means that the colors are not as vibrant as they should be, resulting in a flat and unconvincing image. There are no aspects for which this model can be praised in the context of HDR.

In the HDR category, the Xiaomi A Pro performs poorly overall. Under ideal conditions, it achieves a brightness level of around 250 nits, which is underwhelming. However, many competing models offer similar or even lower brightness levels. Such limited brightness is insufficient to fully showcase the potential of HDR content. In practical terms, the image lacks the depth and intensity expected from high-quality HDR. Instead, the visuals resemble standard dynamic range (SDR), with scenes that should display striking brightness and contrast appearing flat and uninspiring. That said, for its price, the television offers solid DCI-P3 colour gamut coverage at 92%, made possible by its quantum dot (QLED) technology. This ensures vibrant and saturated colours, making it an appealing choice for gamers and movie enthusiasts seeking richer hues and improved colour reproduction compared to standard models.

Factory color reproduction

4/10

5.1/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

The television was tested in movie mode, which – despite its name – does not provide correct image display. The white balance in both 4K HDR and HD/SDR content is characterized by drops in red, causing the image to appear cooler and the colors to lose their natural warmth. The gamma brightness characteristic and EOTF curve confirm that the television has issues maintaining adequate brightness – it strongly boosts it, resulting in an unnaturally washed-out image. This effect can be seen in the comparisons below, where the overall look appears as if a milky filter has been applied. Additionally, limited coverage of a wide color gamut also does not favor quality – color checker tests indicate significant color fluctuations, making it difficult to achieve faithful image reproduction.

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 performs best in movie mode for colour reproduction straight out of the box, though it is not without its flaws. An analysis of the white balance shows negative green values, causing distortions in white tones. At full white, there are noticeable deviations, and the high-contrast image leads to poor tonal transitions in red, negatively impacting the overall colour quality. Before calibration, the image often displays a pink hue in its scenery.

The gamma contrast graph falls below the 2.4 mark, indicating an overemphasis on darker tones and a lack of prominence in lighter areas. Additionally, the EOTF curve shows a sharp rise early on, which can result in lost detail in bright scenes and an oversaturated appearance. These issues suggest that further calibration is needed to balance the colour reproduction and enhance the overall image.

Factory colour settings on the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 are average, and while this is common in televisions of its class, users seeking accurate colour representation may need to adjust the settings. After proper calibration, the TV delivers a more natural and vibrant palette, aligning better with cinematic standards. For those prioritising precise colour reproduction, professional calibration will significantly improve image quality.

Color reproduction after calibration

5.7/10

7/10

After calibration, the image has significantly improved, especially in terms of white balance, which is now more stable, and the hues have acquired a natural quality, eliminating the previous impression of being too cool. The calibration has brought noticeable benefits in terms of tonality – shadows and midtones are now more realistic, and the overall image appears more harmonious. Unfortunately, hardware limitations still affect image quality. The brightness characteristics remain problematic, despite our efforts, and due to poor coverage of the DCI-P3 and BT.2020 color palettes, delta E errors are still at a high level. Although calibration improved some aspects, the television still does not allow for complete satisfaction.

After calibration, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 TV shows significant improvement. The white balance is the most noticeable change, with previous errors corrected in HD and 4K content. Most deviations are now minimal, falling within an acceptable range, resulting in a more balanced and natural colour representation that enhances viewing comfort.

In terms of gamma, the drop has been largely addressed, leading to a more consistent rendering of tones across various scenes. However, the EOTF curve still hasn't seen substantial improvement, as there is limited control over dynamic tone mapping. This limitation means that some details may still be lost in bright scenes, affecting the perception of certain materials.

Despite these minor issues, the overall picture quality is improved after calibration. The enhanced white balance and reduced gamma issues provide a more realistic and enjoyable viewing experience. While further adjustments could enhance the image even more, the TV now showcases its potential, meeting the expectations of many users.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.9/10

9.3/10

The gradation of tonal transitions in Philips PUS7009 is at a good level, without visible issues that could negatively impact content reception. With careful viewing, some minor imperfections can be noticed in bright, colorful transitions; however, they are subtle enough not to pose a hindrance for most users.

During testing of tonal transition fluidity, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 performed admirably. In most test sequences, there were no noticeable issues. Only in the scene with red water were there minor imperfections, but these were cosmetic and did not significantly impact the overall image quality. Both colour and grey gradients were reproduced with almost perfect accuracy, making this TV an excellent choice for those who prioritise this aspect of television performance.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6/10

6.9/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

When it comes to tonal transitions in low-quality material, the function called "Distortion Reduction" (setting "minimum") effectively improves grading, eliminating ugly tonal transitions. However, this setting on Philips televisions is quite aggressive – while it does not blur grain or high-quality material, it can introduce unwanted effects and blur elements that should remain sharp with a poorer signal.

In terms of image scaling, Philips PUS7009 performs decently. A significant advantage is the lack of cropped image edges, meaning no overscan, which allows for displaying the full frame without loss. The image is noticeably improved, making characters and backgrounds, such as the model or branches in the background, look quite detailed and natural, even with lower quality signals. Although scaling is not perfect, as it can remove desired details in the distance, the results are good enough for most users to be satisfied.

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 handles tonal transitions effectively, especially when dealing with lower-quality materials. Thanks to its advanced digital processing, the colour contour removal feature performs surprisingly well. Setting this option to "Medium" provides the best balance, enhancing the smoothness of tonal transitions while avoiding excessive smoothing of other image elements, like film grain.

In the case of a tested frame featuring a model with numerous branches in the background, the TV demonstrated its digital processing strengths. Adding artificial sharpness clarified the model’s details, particularly enhancing the hair's definition. However, around the branches, subtle contours emerged due to digital intervention. While this adds detail to the overall image, excessive sharpness can sometimes cause certain elements to appear unnaturally highlighted.

Blur and motion smoothness

5/10

4.3/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
Nie
Nie
BFI function 120Hz
Nie
Nie
Brightness drop with BFI
0%
0%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Philips PUS7009 does not have any motion smoothing feature for movies, which means we cannot choose whether the picture should be more stuttery or more cinematic. These features could improve more dynamic scenes. As for motion blur, despite using a 60Hz IPS panel, the situation looks quite good. The response time between pixels is better than in VA panel versions, which means that motion blur remains at an acceptable level and does not significantly affect the viewing comfort of dynamic scenes.

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 features a motion smoothing option known as "Motion Smoothing," which is designed mainly for film viewing. It allows users to adjust the effect to either a more cinematic, film-like appearance with visible frames or a smoother, theatrical image. This feature will likely satisfy movie lovers. However, gamers and sports enthusiasts might be disappointed. The TV uses a 60 Hz refresh rate panel, typical for this price range, which doesn’t offer exceptional motion handling. Our "Ufo" test revealed some motion blur, so those seeking sharper moving images may find it lacking in this regard.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

3.3/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    No
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    No
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

In terms of compatibility with consoles, Philips PUS7009 is suitable for casual gamers. Despite using HDMI 2.0, the TV offers access to features such as ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode), VRR (Variable Refresh Rate), and Game Bar. ALLM automatically switches the TV to low latency mode, allowing for faster response during gameplay, while VRR dynamically adjusts the refresh rate to reduce screen tearing. Game Bar is a tool that provides quick access to game settings and real-time monitoring of parameters - though we believe it appears weaker compared to competing Game Bars.

Unfortunately, more demanding gamers may be disappointed. Philips PUS7009 does not support advanced HDR formats in games or high refresh rates, due to the use of a 60 Hz panel. The lack of support for these features limits the TV's ability to deliver smooth and fully detailed experiences during fast-paced gameplay.

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 includes several gamer-friendly features, such as the Game Bar, which sets itself apart from the typical dashboards seen in other brands. This feature allows quick access to game-related settings, making it convenient during intense gaming sessions. The TV also supports Automatic Low Latency Mode (ALLM), automatically switching to a game-optimised mode to reduce signal delays. However, it lacks HDMI 2.1 support, limiting compatibility with the latest gaming consoles that require higher bandwidth. Additionally, it does not support features like VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) or G-Sync, which are becoming essential for gamers seeking smoother visuals and reduced tearing. While the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 has some useful features, there are better options in this price range offering more advanced gaming solutions.

Input lag

10/10

9.8/10

SDR

1080p60
11 ms
15 ms
1080p120
2160p60
11 ms
15 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
11 ms
14 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

Input lag in PUS7009 is at a very good level – it amounts to just 11 ms for supported resolutions. For most players, this low level of latency should be satisfactory, providing smooth and responsive experiences during gameplay.

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 achieves excellent results, regardless of the resolution or HDR mode. With measurements as low as 15 ms, this television ranks among the best in terms of responsiveness.

Compatibility with PC

5/10

1/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
43ms
105ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RGB
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

Philips PUS7009 is one of the better choices as a monitor for office work. The readability of fonts is very good, regardless of the background – both on light and dark backgrounds, the text remains clear and easy to read. In daily use, especially with text and office tasks, this television performs excellently. However, computer gamers may be somewhat disappointed – the input lag in "Monitor" mode of 43 ms is too high to ensure comfortable gameplay in fast-paced games that require quick reactions. The use of a 60 Hz panel and lack of support for G-Sync means that the television does not meet the standards expected by PC gamers. Therefore, the rating in this category is lower, although the device performs well for everyday computer use for work.

In the category of cooperation with a PC, Xiaomi A Pro 2025 performs very poorly. The fonts are of low quality, and their display on the screen is often problematic. Dithering is ubiquitous; when zooming in on the fonts against a dark background, they are displayed in three colours, which is definitely glaring and can significantly hinder the comfortable use of the device. Such problems can be a significant disadvantage for users who plan to use the television as a computer monitor.

Viewing angles

6.8/10

2.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
71%
81%

Philips PUS7009, thanks to the use of an IPS panel, offers quite good viewing angles. The image remains relatively clear and uniform even when viewed from a greater angle, which is definitely a better result compared to the variant with a VA panel, where there is usually a rapid deterioration in image quality with deviations from the axis.

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 performs poorly in terms of viewing angles due to its VA panel. While the TV offers better blacks when viewed directly in front, the image quality degrades significantly from side angles. During testing, our specialists observed that sitting just one metre from the device caused the image on the right side to appear brightened and desaturated. However, shifting slightly to the side improved the picture, highlighting the noticeable difference in image quality depending on the viewing angle. This makes the viewing experience less enjoyable for larger groups.

TV efficiency during daytime

4.5/10

3.8/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Average
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

XIAOMI A PRO 2025: 249 cd/m2

Philips PUS7009 (IPS): 286 cd/m2

Although the panel in PUS7009 is equipped with a satin coating that effectively suppresses reflections, the brightness level of 280 nits in SDR mode is simply too low for the television to perform well in bright rooms. As a result, in highly sunlit conditions, details on the screen may be hard to discern, which reduces user comfort during the day.

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 presents itself as average. The screen coating is satin, which may help reduce reflections, but the suppression of reflections is average. The brightness of the television is only 250 nits, which is a relatively low result compared to other models on the market. As a result, during sunny days or in brightly lit rooms, the image quality may suffer, and details may be hard to discern.

Details about the matrix

Software version during testing
White LED
PFS LED
Backlight Type
TPN246E_V246.004.012.161
RTM5.220609.003.1850
Image processor
M7632 2GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity:

Philips PUS7009 (IPS)

XIAOMI A PRO 2025

TV features

6.8/10

6.5/10

  • Operating system
    Titan OS
    Google TV
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • AirPlay
    No
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
  • Possibility to connect Bluetooth headphones to the TV
    Yes
    Yes
  • Possibility to simultaneously use Bluetooth headphones and the TV speaker
    Yes
    No
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    RF
    RF
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes

Philips has decided this year to change its approach to the operating system, replacing the previous open Google TV system with its own TitanOS. As is often the case with new solutions, TitanOS is struggling with typical growing pains. Currently, it offers only basic applications, and the app store leaves much to be desired, which may disappoint users expecting a rich selection of programs. Additionally, the lack of support for AirPlay functionality and the inability to record to USB are further limitations that may affect the overall user experience.

An interesting feature of the models with TitanOS is the new remote control, which is very convenient to use thanks to its backlighting. Unfortunately, its wireless operation is not entirely consistent. The hybrid design means that sometimes you need to aim at the TV, and other times you do not – it depends on the buttons being used. This is simply irritating.

On the positive side, support for Bluetooth should be noted, allowing for the connection of a mouse or other peripheral devices. This is particularly useful when using the browser, which may serve as an alternative due to the limited availability of applications in the TitanOS app store.

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 stands out with its Google TV system, one of its key advantages. This platform provides access to a wide range of applications and streaming services, making the TV easy to use. It also features a voice assistant for streamlined navigation and quick content searches without the need to scroll through menus. A major benefit of Google TV is the ability to download virtually any app from the Google Play Store, allowing users to customise the TV to suit their preferences. Users can install streaming, gaming, and other apps, turning the TV into a multimedia entertainment centre. However, it’s important to note that this model lacks recording features and AirPlay, which may disappoint some users. Additionally, there are noticeable lag issues with the operating system, which can affect ease of use. On the plus side, the TV supports Bluetooth pairing with other devices and the remote control can operate without the need to aim at the screen, enhancing user comfort. Despite a few shortcomings, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 is a solid option for those seeking a modern TV experience.

Playing files from USB

8/10

6.8/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

In terms of playing files from USB, Philips PUS7009 performs quite decently. The TV plays most popular formats of photos, audio, and video, and an additional plus is the support for Polish subtitles and the ability to change fonts. Unfortunately, it has issues with playing some image resolutions.

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 comes with a decent built-in media player that satisfies basic user expectations. However, it does have limitations, occasionally struggling with certain file formats, which could be a point of frustration. Thankfully, with access to the Google Play Store, users can easily download alternative media players to better suit their needs. In testing, we found that the TV's compatibility with apps is generally strong, and third-party media players work seamlessly. The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 runs on the Android TV platform, providing access to apps and streaming services. By installing alternative media players, users can overcome compatibility issues and enhance the TV’s functionality. This makes the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 a more versatile option, capable of meeting diverse media playback needs of users, including those with more demanding requirements.

Apps

7/10

10/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
OK
Kodi

Sound

5.6/10

6/10

  • Subjective sound quality:
    5.6/10
    6/10
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1:
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1:
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC):
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD:
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA:
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio:
    Yes
    Yes

The sound in Philips PUS7009 is rather flat and does not stand out against other televisions. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that the TV supports all popular audio formats, including Dolby and DTS, which is a plus in the context of compatibility with various audio sources.

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 offers surprisingly good sound quality for its price range. The audio performance is solid, meeting expectations for a TV in this class. Notably, it supports DTS audio formats, a feature often absent in even more expensive models. While this assessment is subjective and may differ based on personal preferences, the TV delivers a commendable audio experience for its price point.