Philips PUS7000 vs Philips OLED950

Direct comparison

OLED950 / OLED+

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 65”77”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.3

8.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.8

    8.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.7

    8.8

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.9

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    6.5

    9.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    5.8

    6.5

  • Watching in bright light

    3.5

    7.3

  • Utility functions

    5.0

    6.5

  • Apps

    6.7

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    5.8

    8.2

Advantages

  • Attractive price

  • High contrast VA panel

  • Very low input lag

  • Gaming features – presence of VRR, ALLM, and a dedicated Game Bar

  • HDR10+ support

  • Quite decent image processing (for such a cheap TV)

  • Good readability of fonts – will work well as a large monitor

  • Backlit remote control with numeric keypad

  • Amazing peak brightness, exceeding 2000 nits on test panels (Tandem OLED matrix)

  • Perfect blacks and infinite contrast

  • Support for all HDR formats, including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Excellent support for gamers: 4K@120Hz, VRR, ALLM, and 144 Hz mode

  • Very low input lag

  • Impressive 4-sided Ambilight system

  • Google TV system offering access to a vast library of applications

  • Backlit remote control, rechargeable via USB-C port

Disadvantages

No like
  • Very low brightness – 200 nits

  • No Ambilight

  • Lack of any features to improve fluidity makes the image very "raw"

  • Titan OS system – the interface is slow, and it lacks many popular applications

  • The remote works with infrared

  • Only two HDMI ports in standard 2.1

  • Remote control communicating via infrared (requires aiming at the receiver)

  • Very high price compared to market competition

  • Sound quality noticeably weaker than in the lower model OLED910

  • Slight issues with posterization

Our verdict

If you are looking for a specific reason to buy the Philips PUS7000, it is essentially just the price. This model is meant to be primarily inexpensive, and it fulfills that role perfectly. It could be a decent choice for someone who is still using an old Full HD screen and wants to finally switch to 4K without emptying their wallet. Interestingly, even though this is a "budget 60 Hz" model, Philips has not forgotten about gamers. We get VRR and ALLM, which significantly enhance the gaming experience when connected to a console, making everything quite responsive. But... well, the biggest problem with this TV is brightness, or rather, the lack of it. 200 nits is an output that makes the PUS7000 simply capitulate on a sunny day. The image will be pale and unclear even though it features a high-contrast VA panel. HDR here is basically just a label on the box. With such a dark panel, HDR content looks artificial and simply lacks the necessary intensity, so it’s better to forget about it and stick with regular SDR. Is it worth buying? At this price point, every manufacturer makes similar compromises, so the PUS7000 does not drastically fall behind the rest of the budget screens. The only question is whether you can get along with the Titan OS, which is still a bit raw and lacks many apps that are standard among competitors. With today’s prices, where Chinese brands like TCL and Hisense are flooding the market with QLEDs and Mini-LEDs, the Philips PUS7000 faces a really tough battle. If you care about a well-known brand logo and a low price: you can go for it. However, if you are looking for image quality… you’d better double-check your budget before purchasing.

Philips OLED950 is undoubtedly a technological showcase that redefines what we can expect from a home entertainment center in many aspects. The use of groundbreaking Tandem OLED technology means that when it comes to picture quality, we are reaching absolute heights here. The combination of infinite black and perfect contrast with brightness that can exceed the magical barrier of 2000 nits in HDR mode produces effects that, at times, take your breath away. Whether we are watching movies in a sunlit living room or playing games at night with the support of a 4-sided Ambilight system, the experience is simply phenomenal. This is a complete screen that will satisfy both the cinephile seeking fidelity in Dolby Vision and the gamer demanding 144 Hz and perfect motion response.

However, this admiration for the raw performance of the panel is mixed with some disappointment when we look at the manufacturer's promises regarding image processing. Philips strongly promoted the use of a "dual" P5 processor, suggesting that it would be a remedy for all the woes of digital signal processing. However, the reality turned out to be less revolutionary. In our tests, the difference compared to models equipped with the standard, single P5 chip was almost imperceptible in everyday use. Issues with the smoothness of tonal transitions and posterization in difficult scenes, although rare, still occur. Given the astronomical price of this model, we expected a much greater qualitative leap in this aspect that would justify such a high positioning of the equipment. The issue of cost-effectiveness becomes the biggest problem for this otherwise outstanding television. When we look at the market with a cool head, the situation of the 950 model becomes complicated. It's not just about the strong competition from cheaper flagship models like the LG G5 or Samsung S95F, but about the "fratricidal" fight within Philips' own offerings. It turns out that the lower-positioned OLED910 model offers us practically the same brilliant image generated by an identical panel. Moreover, the 910 model wins at the starting gate in terms of audio, offering an integrated soundbar from Bowers & Wilkins, which is simply absent in the more expensive 950 model in favor of a different design. Thus, we encounter a paradox: we get the same picture and worse sound, yet we have to pay significantly more. Therefore, although the OLED950 is a fantastic screen, in 2025 the title of "Best Philips TV" and our recommendation goes to the model OLED910.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
2 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Premium
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.9/10

10/10

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,500:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,550:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail
Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail
Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail
Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

The model PUS7000 we tested in the 55-inch size is equipped with a VA panel. This is significant for black quality, as in such budget constructions we do not find local dimming systems that could assist the screen in dark scenes. Therefore, all the work rests on the panel itself, which, thanks to its characteristics, offers a decent contrast of 6000:1. In practice, this translates to much better experiences during evening viewings compared to competing TVs with IPS panels. The black here is better separated from bright elements, making dark parts of the image not appear washed out, and details in shadows remain visible. However, it is worth noting that in completely dark conditions, the black may slightly take on shades of navy blue and will not be as perfectly "pitch black" as in more expensive models. To mitigate this effect and improve depth perception, it is advisable to consider watching the TV with soft, additional lighting in the room. Usually, this issue was somewhat resolved by the well-known Ambilight system from Philips TVs, which, through a glow on the wall, optically increases contrast. Unfortunately, in the PUS7000 model, the manufacturer decided to look for savings, so we do not find this backlighting system here, which is standard in higher series like the PUS8000.

There's no need to elaborate here. Like in every OLED TV, the black level and contrast in the Philips OLED950 are simply perfect. No matter the movie scene being watched, nighttime shots, or materials in 2.39:1 aspect ratio with black bars, you can count on perfect black without bleeding or washout. This is one of the biggest advantages of OLED technology over LCD and Mini-LED TVs. There are no algorithms for local dimming at play here, nor are there any compromises. Black always remains black. The only thing we noticed in our tests is the helicopter scene from the movie Sicario 2. The OLED950 quite clearly highlights details in the shadows. However, this is a characteristic of our test sample, more related to the nature of image reproduction than to the black level itself. In this regard, everything here is top-notch.

HDR effect quality

3.3/10

8.7/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 78.3%, Bt.2020: 57.1%
DCI P3: 99.7%, Bt.2020: 82.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

197 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

209 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

230 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

1910 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2084 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2194 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2179 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

1370 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review Philips PUS7000 HDR effect quality
Review Philips OLED950 HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review Philips PUS7000 HDR effect quality
Review Philips OLED950 HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review Philips PUS7000 HDR effect quality
Review Philips OLED950 HDR effect quality

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Review Philips PUS7000 HDR effect quality
Review Philips OLED950 HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

Philips OLED950

HDR luminance

Luminance of RGB colors

Philips PUS7000

HDR luminance

Unfortunately, the PUS7000 is not suitable for watching HDR content. This screen is simply too dark. A brightness level of 200 nits is not enough to correctly display such a format. Even if a HDR signal message appears on the screen, the image will resemble a regular SDR recording. Therefore, it's better to stick with the latter format to avoid issues in displaying bright scenes, which you can read about below. The situation is not improved by the fact that this is a classic LCD model without additional layers to enhance colors, such as QLED or PFS. As a result, colors in HDR may appear washed out. Ultimately, this gives a worse effect than in the standard SDR format, which is simply better suited to the capabilities of this panel.

OLED950 is a phenomenal TV for consuming HDR content, which is primarily due to the use of innovative Tandem OLED technology. With this technology, the screen is capable of generating astronomical brightness values, reaching over 2000 nits in movie scenes (on test screens). This is an outstanding result, placing the OLED950 model among the very top displays available on the market. However, it should be noted that there is a specific characteristic of this solution – at moments when full-screen bursts of light appear on the screen, the brightness can drop by as much as half. Nevertheless, it is worth emphasizing that values above 1000 nits on a full screen are still an outstanding result. This allows for HDR images to be displayed exactly as filmmakers would wish, maintaining the dynamics and impact of light scenes.

The use of Tandem OLED technology has also brought measurable benefits in terms of color reproduction, improving elements where traditional WOLED panels have had difficulties compared to QD-OLED competitors. In the case of the OLED950, the color gamut coverage is broader than in classic WOLED panels, reaching nearly 100% of the DCI-P3 space and a solid 82% of the demanding BT.2020 palette. Although these results still do not match the high achievements of QD-OLED panels, the difference diminishes during real-world usage. We cannot deny that in the vast majority of films, colors look simply fantastic on this model – they are saturated, vibrant, and full of depth.

Factory color reproduction

5.3/10

5.5/10

Review Philips PUS7000 Factory color reproduction
Review Philips OLED950 Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review Philips PUS7000 Factory color reproduction
Review Philips OLED950 Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the television in movie mode, which theoretically should provide the best and most natural colors. And indeed, this mode is quite correct; however, after connecting the calibration equipment, its biggest flaw became apparent. The PUS7000 has significant deficiencies in displaying red. Poorly tuned white balance and too low saturation of this color cause the image to appear too cool. As a result, one might get the impression that the displayed content is simply lacking in vibrant colors. The situation is exacerbated by the fact that both SDR and HDR content are excessively brightened. This is confirmed by the gamma curve and EOTF graphs, which show that the television displays the image brighter than it should. This causes scenes to lose their depth and may appear somewhat washed out. Fortunately, the Philips menu offers many functions to improve these aspects, so we immediately proceeded to calibration to see what could be squeezed out of this screen.

We tested the OLED950 model in Movie mode. Although it is theoretically the best and most faithful preset on this television, in practice, it proved to be not without flaws. Interestingly, in the unit we tested, the biggest challenge wasn't the white balance itself – although it did have a slight tendency to give the image a pinkish tint. The main problem lay in the way the television managed brightness, both in everyday SDR content and in demanding HDR scenes. Analysis of the gamma chart and EOTF curve leads to one key conclusion: the television excessively highlights brightness in the lower registers. This results in the image appearing less contrasty than the panel technology would allow. Details in dark areas that should remain perfectly black (characteristic of "OLED black") are simply unnecessarily highlighted and brightened. Fortunately, these errors can be corrected using the appropriate tools, so – as always – we proceeded with professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

9.4/10

Review Philips PUS7000 Color reproduction after calibration
Review Philips OLED950 Color reproduction after calibration
Review Philips PUS7000 Color reproduction after calibration
Review Philips OLED950 Color reproduction after calibration

After professional calibration, it is clear that the PUS7000 responds well to image adjustments. In this price range, this is not a given. The effects should be assessed in two scenarios, depending on what content we plan to watch. SDR performs the best. After our corrections, the image looks really good. Most color errors fell below level 3, which is the threshold at which distortions typically become visible to the naked eye in measurements. Movies, series, sports, and regular television present themselves naturally, without unpleasant deviations. If someone primarily watches classic channels or streaming in HD quality, the difference after calibration will be noticeable immediately. However, it must be made clear that the PUS7000 is still not a television suitable for sensible HDR, and calibration does not change much here. The reason lies in the hardware: colors remain too undersaturated. The television lacks solutions that expand the color gamut, such as PFS filters or a quantum dot layer, so the panel simply cannot show the intense colors required by HDR. This is most evident in reds, which still look pale. This limitation cannot be bypassed with menu settings, as it results from the design of the backlighting and the panel itself.

As can be seen, the OLED950 transforms into an absolutely phenomenal display after a professional calibration process, which without a shadow of a doubt can be placed in the same category as the best televisions currently available in the world. This equipment only needed a professional touch to show its full potential and eliminate factory shortcomings. The minimal errors in reproduction in Color Checker tests and the fidelity of the color palette speak for themselves. We are dealing with an almost perfect device here. A true window to the world, offering top-notch image quality.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

6/10

7.1/10

Review Philips PUS7000 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips OLED950 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips PUS7000 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips OLED950 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips PUS7000 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips OLED950 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips PUS7000 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips OLED950 Smoothness of tonal transitions

In terms of color gradation in bright scenes, the PUS7000 model performs surprisingly well. It's hard to have any major complaints here. The color transitions are natural and smooth, so there are no disturbing bands or jumps between shades on a bright background. When watching cheerful scenes, nothing should distract your attention from the screen. However, the situation changes dramatically when darker shades of gray or simply very dark colors appear on the screen. Unfortunately, you can then see quite strong "stepping" of colors. Instead of smooth transitions, you get clear cuts between individual tones. In dark, atmospheric films, this can be quite annoying and distract from the viewing experience, as the tonal transitions are not as clean as in the bright parts of the image.

If we had to point out the weaker point of the OLED950 model compared to market competitors like the G5 or S95F, it would be, as with most TVs from this manufacturer, the digital signal processing. Although the processor used here is referred to as a "dual" processor, our tests did not show significant changes compared to the lower-positioned OLED910 model. The differences are in reality symbolic, which was reflected in only a cosmetic increase in the rating in this category. In very demanding, especially dark scenes, one can still occasionally notice issues with slight posterization. However, it should be clearly emphasized that this is a "flaw" that an average viewer very rarely notices during normal usage, and the overall reception remains at a high level.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.5/10

7.1/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Review Philips PUS7000 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips OLED950 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review Philips PUS7000 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips OLED950 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

The PUS7000 handles digital image processing quite well. The distortion reduction feature deserves praise, as it effectively smooths out unwanted tonal transitions even at a low setting. However, it has a flaw: if the action is too aggressive, it can introduce undesirable artifacts on the screen. It’s a good idea to experiment with this setting to find the sweet spot between a smooth image and detail clarity.

The upscaling, which is the enhancement of lower quality materials to 4K, is adequate. The image after processing is very "soft," which is typical for almost all Philips televisions. The edges are plastic and smooth, making the image look cohesive. If someone finds it too soft, it can always be adjusted with the sharpness slider in the menu to achieve a more pronounced effect.

Upscaling

In terms of image scaling, the proprietary P5 processor performs just as well as in most models from this manufacturer. Lower resolution content takes on a very soft and plastic character. Such a presentation will certainly appeal to many. However, if you prefer sharper contours, you can gently enhance them with the appropriate slider in the TV menu. In this aspect, it's really hard to pick on anything. The image simply looks very good and additionally there is no problem with the phenomenon of overscan.

Smoothing and Distortion Reduction

The tonal transition smoothing feature fares a bit worse. In the settings, we find an option called “Distortion Reduction.” This allows for three levels of processor intervention adjustment. Unfortunately, the Minimum setting works poorly and the smoothing effects are negligible. The Medium level gives a decent result, but it also starts to smooth out the skin details of actors. On the other hand, the Maximum setting works too aggressively. It removes definitely too many details from the face and background elements or can even take away the film grain. To achieve the optimal effect, it's worth playing around with these settings at home and adjusting them to your preferences. It might seem that the Medium option represents the best compromise here.

Blur and motion smoothness

3.9/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur ():

Blur (4K@144Hz):

In this regard, we don't really have any good news. It might seem that the biggest downside is the lack of a 120 Hz panel, but in this price range, that's actually standard, and it's hard to expect more. However, the worst part is that the TV does not have any motion smoothing features. There are no supporting systems for either movies or sports. We have to accept that the image on the PUS7000 is processed "raw." This means that during dynamic scenes or fast camera movements, the motion may appear choppy or unclear. We have no way to enable any smoother that would soften this effect.

The motion representation in the OLED950 model is virtually perfect. This is typical for screens of this type (OLED 120Hz+), as the matrix shows no blurring at all. Thanks to this, we can enjoy flawless sharpness in practically any conditions. A big part of this is not only due to the specifics of organic technology. Equally important work is done by the smoothing systems implemented by the manufacturer.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Although the PUS7000 is not marketed as a gaming TV, it does not perform as poorly in this category as one might expect. While there is no support for 120 Hz refresh rates, which is understandable at this price point, the manufacturer has included several important features that genuinely improve the comfort of playing on a console. The most significant of these are VRR and ALLM technologies. VRR is responsible for synchronizing the screen with the number of frames generated by the console. This prevents the image from "tearing" and keeps it consistent even during sudden frame drops in the game. In turn, ALLM is a solution that automatically switches the TV to the lowest latency mode right after detecting a signal from the console. All of these parameters are easily accessible thanks to the Game Bar feature. This is a special control panel for gamers that can be brought up on the screen at any time. It allows for a quick overview of current settings and connection status without interrupting gameplay, which is a very convenient solution.

OLED950 is almost the perfect TV for gamers. This is not only due to the unique atmosphere that the Ambilight system creates during gameplay. The most important aspect here is the solid hardware support. We find literally everything that one should expect from a modern gaming screen today. The manufacturer has implemented two HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gb/s. This gives us access to gaming in 4K resolution at 120 frames per second. Of course, support for VRR technology and the ALLM automatic game mode is also included. The device handles any HDR signal effortlessly, whether we are using Dolby Vision or the HGiG standard.

Access to all settings is available from one place thanks to the special Game Bar overlay. Although this interface may not be the most graphically attractive on the market, it fully serves its purpose. It displays all the most important signal parameters and offers useful additions. Gamers can take advantage of the mini-map zoom function or add a permanent crosshair on the screen, which can be seen as a small aid in online competition. Adjusting the contrast range also proves useful. It allows for brightening shadows and achieving better visibility of enemies hidden in the dark corners of the map.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
12 ms
12 ms
1080p120
5 ms
2160p60
12 ms
12 ms
2160p120
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
12 ms
2160p120
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
12 ms
2160p120 DV
5 ms

Another plus for gamers is the very low input lag at around 12 ms. In this price range, the result is impressive. The delay is small enough that the response to controller movements feels instantaneous, and in practice, it's hard to notice at all. Gaming remains comfortable even in fast, dynamic titles where every millisecond counts. In this regard, the PUS7000 can keep pace with much more expensive televisions.

According to what we have come to expect from televisions in this segment, the signal delay in this model is practically negligible. Our measurements indicated nearly reference values: just 5 ms at a refresh rate of 120 Hz and 12 ms for a 60 Hz signal. This means an instantaneous response to every command issued via a controller, mouse, or keyboard. With such low results, the only limitation during dynamic online gameplay is now just your own reflexes and lack of "skill," not the hardware. 😉

Compatibility with PC

5.8/10

6.5/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
12ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BWRG
Max refresh rate
60Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes
Review Philips PUS7000 Compatibility with PC
Review Philips OLED950 Compatibility with PC

When it comes to connecting a computer, the gaming options are quite limited. The screen supports a maximum of 60 Hz and does not offer G-Sync technology, so it is not equipment for demanding PC gamers. However, the PUS7000 surprisingly performs well for text work. The readability of the fonts is at a very high level. The TV correctly handles chrominance sampling at 4:4:4. This means that every letter, regardless of its size or color, is displayed sharp and without any distortion at the edges. As a result, office work or browsing the internet on this screen is simply comfortable and does not strain the eyes like some cheap panels that have trouble with clean font rendering.

In this category, the situation looks quite specific. If we look at the OLED950 through the lens of a gamer, we get a phenomenal display. It works excellently not only with consoles but also in combination with a powerful computer. We have access to an additional 144 Hz mode, full support for G-Sync and FreeSync technologies, as well as very low signal latency. One could therefore risk stating that for PC gamers, this is an almost ideal monitor.

However, problems arise when we examine the readability of the fonts. We're not just talking about the unusual subpixel arrangement of the WOLED panels (BWRG), which in all televisions of this type causes a specific coloration of text edges. The tested model struggles with correctly displaying Chroma 4:4:4 sampling. This is mainly visible when we display colored text on another colorful background. The letters then gain strange shading, unnatural contours, and unwanted artifacts. It's a bit of a shame, although one must honestly admit that this is a very specific flaw. For 99% of you, no one is likely to notice this during normal entertainment. However, if you belong to that 1% of people planning to purchase the OLED950 strictly as a monitor for office work, you may feel disappointed.

Viewing angles

3.1/10

7.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
70%
29%

The viewing angles in this model are poor, which results directly from the use of a VA-type panel. Although this panel provides decent contrast, as I mentioned earlier, it has one major drawback: it requires sitting directly in front of the screen. Just slightly shifting to the side is enough for the colors to start losing saturation, and the picture becomes noticeably worse.

As befits organic technology, the viewing angles here are practically very good. We can enjoy a great picture regardless of where we sit on the sofa while looking at the screen. The only reservation comes when directly comparing the used Tandem OLED matrix with the competition's solutions. Compared to last year's LG panels equipped with the MLA filter or the best QD-OLED screens from Samsung, the angles in the OLED950 are slightly weaker. They are not as perfect as those of the mentioned rivals. Nevertheless, they still generally maintain a very high level, and in everyday use, it's hard to consider this a drawback.

Daytime performance

3.5/10

7.3/10

Panel finish
Satin
Glare
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good
Review Philips PUS7000 Daytime performance
Review Philips OLED950 Daytime performance
Review Philips PUS7000 Daytime performance
Review Philips OLED950 Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

Philips OLED950: 615 cd/m2

Philips PUS7000: 202 cd/m2

In a sunny room, the PUS7000 performs poorly. This is all because the panel is simply dim. A brightness level of 200 nits is a very low score that does not allow for comfortable viewing in bright daylight. On the positive side, the satin screen coating does quite well in reducing reflections. Thanks to it, the panel does not display reflections as prominently, but this is not enough to save the situation. The brightness of this model is too low to cut through strong sunlight, so in very bright rooms, the image will simply be unclear.

The OLED950 model works perfectly well in really bright rooms without concerns. The key advantage here is the previously mentioned very high brightness of the panel. In terms of OLED technology, the performance is impressive. It can confidently be stated that in this regard, this television is capable of competing with mid-range Mini-LED models. In the world of organic panels, this is not at all obvious, which is a significant plus for the tested device.

However, there is one drawback that can be described as its Achilles' heel. Similar to most Tandem OLED panels, the manufacturer has used a glossy screen coating here. Unfortunately, it does not handle direct light reflections very well. It's worth keeping this in mind when planning the TV’s placement relative to windows, as reflections may be visible.

Panel details

Backlight Type
White LED
Software version during testing
TPN256E_V056.002.236.141
Image processor
MT5896

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Philips PUS7000 TV Panel details
Review Philips OLED950 TV Panel details

TV features

5/10

6.5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    No
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    No
  • Voice search
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features

Titan OS System

Titan OS is still a fairly new operating system, and unfortunately, this is evident in daily use. Overall, it operates sluggishly, sometimes even clumsily. The response to commands from the remote is slow, which is further complicated by the fact that the device uses infrared connectivity instead of Bluetooth / RF. This means that we have to aim the remote quite precisely at the television for the system to respond at all. During testing, the screen mirroring feature with computers equipped with Windows failed to work again. Fortunately, streaming from Apple devices using AirPlay went smoothly. Another drawback of Titan OS is the very modest app library. The selection is much smaller than in systems like webOS or Tizen, not to mention Google TV, where the choice of programs is almost unlimited.

Classic Features

On the other hand, the PUS7000 might be a good choice for people who mainly watch traditional television. Here we find a properly functioning teletext and a clear EPG interface, which is the electronic program guide. The remote included in the package is backlit, which greatly facilitates operation after dark, and it has standard numeric buttons for quick channel selection. Interestingly, there is a classic headphone jack input. This is a rarely seen addition in new televisions, allowing for the connection of older home theater systems or wired headphones without the need for additional adapters.

Smart Features

The biggest advantage of the OLED950 is the Google TV system — the manufacturer is increasingly moving away from it in cheaper models in favor of TitanOS, but here we fortunately still have a fully functional environment based on Android. This means access to a vast library of applications, a voice assistant, and convenient features like Chromecast. For unknown reasons, our editorial team was once again unable to launch Windows Miracast, despite the manufacturer declaring that this option is available. On the positive side: Apple device users can rest easy, as the television supports AirPlay.

Classic Features

In terms of "classics," the television offers a rather basic set: teletext and Bluetooth connectivity. The most criticisms are directed at the remote control. On one hand, it is sensibly designed, has backlighting, "hybrid" switching between the control of typical functions and a numeric keypad, and charges via USB-C. On the other hand, enthusiasm quickly fades when it turns out you need to point it at the screen, as it operates on infrared.

Apps

6.7/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8.2/10

9.5/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player works quite well and handles most popular video formats without major issues. The TV easily reads subtitles from files and manages various audio formats, so those who keep movies on a disk or USB drive should not feel limited. The only complaint pertains to the photo browser - not everything worked correctly, and some files, especially at certain resolutions, would not open at all.

The built-in file player in the OLED950 model works wonderfully. During our tests, the device handled practically every format we provided. Whether they were video files, audio tracks, or photos, the TV played them without any issues. It’s hard to find any weak points in handling the most popular standards. However, if someone still finds something lacking (which seems unlikely), the operating system comes to the rescue. With the presence of Google TV, we are not limited to just the default solutions. At any moment, one can enter the app store and install an external player, such as the popular VLC or Kodi. This ensures that the TV can handle literally any file from our home library.

Sound

5.8/10

8.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    85dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

The sound is already at a typical budget level. It is sufficient for news and public affairs programs, but when it comes to movies and music, it quickly lacks depth and bass. At this price range, it's hard to expect something more, so if we care about better experiences, it’s worth considering a soundbar or connecting external audio, even through the headphone output.

The 2.1 speaker system used here, with a total power of 70 W, provides a solid dose of quality sound. It plays clearly, and thanks to the additional subwoofer at the back of the case, the sound is deep and has a distinct punch. This element is often missing in cheaper models, where the bass is practically nonexistent. However, we must face the truth when comparing it to the OLED910 model. That TV, equipped with a built-in Bowers & Wilkins soundbar, simply sounds much better. Was it a good decision? In our opinion, the outstanding audio from the 910 model adds greater value. Choosing the 950 model makes sense mainly if you're big fans of Ambilight, and the sound issue is taken care of by your external home theater or soundbar.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

No acoustic data