Philips PUS7000 vs LG QNED80A6A (IPS)

Direct comparison

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 43”65”86”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.3

5.9

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.8

    5.7

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.7

    5.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.9

    5.5

  • Gaming on console

    6.5

    6.8

  • TV as a computer monitor

    5.8

    5.0

  • Watching in bright light

    3.5

    4.7

  • Utility functions

    5.0

    6.8

  • Apps

    6.7

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    5.8

    6.0

Advantages

  • Attractive price

  • High contrast VA panel

  • Very low input lag

  • Gaming features – presence of VRR, ALLM, and a dedicated Game Bar

  • HDR10+ support

  • Quite decent image processing (for such a cheap TV)

  • Good readability of fonts – will work well as a large monitor

  • Backlit remote control with numeric keypad

  • Wide viewing angles – the image looks just as good from any spot on the couch

  • Rich and vibrant colors thanks to the PFS filter (QNED)

  • Smooth and modern WebOS 25 system

  • Magic remote (with cursor)

  • Good detail reproduction in HDR

  • Effective upscaling and tone transition smoothing function

  • Low input lag

  • Decent features for gamers (VRR, ALLM, HGiG), despite the 60Hz panel

  • Smooth tone transitions – no visible "banding" in color gradients

Disadvantages

No like
  • Very low brightness – 200 nits

  • No Ambilight

  • Lack of any features to improve fluidity makes the image very "raw"

  • Titan OS system – the interface is slow, and it lacks many popular applications

  • The remote works with infrared

  • Poor contrast and grayish black – the IPS panel does not perform well in low light

  • Problematic local dimming – vertical backlight bands are highly visible on a dark background

  • 60Hz panel

  • No Dolby Vision support

  • Sound lacking depth – a soundbar is recommended

Our verdict

If you are looking for a specific reason to buy the Philips PUS7000, it is essentially just the price. This model is meant to be primarily inexpensive, and it fulfills that role perfectly. It could be a decent choice for someone who is still using an old Full HD screen and wants to finally switch to 4K without emptying their wallet. Interestingly, even though this is a "budget 60 Hz" model, Philips has not forgotten about gamers. We get VRR and ALLM, which significantly enhance the gaming experience when connected to a console, making everything quite responsive. But... well, the biggest problem with this TV is brightness, or rather, the lack of it. 200 nits is an output that makes the PUS7000 simply capitulate on a sunny day. The image will be pale and unclear even though it features a high-contrast VA panel. HDR here is basically just a label on the box. With such a dark panel, HDR content looks artificial and simply lacks the necessary intensity, so it’s better to forget about it and stick with regular SDR. Is it worth buying? At this price point, every manufacturer makes similar compromises, so the PUS7000 does not drastically fall behind the rest of the budget screens. The only question is whether you can get along with the Titan OS, which is still a bit raw and lacks many apps that are standard among competitors. With today’s prices, where Chinese brands like TCL and Hisense are flooding the market with QLEDs and Mini-LEDs, the Philips PUS7000 faces a really tough battle. If you care about a well-known brand logo and a low price: you can go for it. However, if you are looking for image quality… you’d better double-check your budget before purchasing.

The QNED80A variant based on IPS technology targets a completely different audience. If you are looking for a television for a space where life buzzes all day, and family members watch TV from different spots, this will be a good choice. Wide viewing angles and saturated colors ensure that the picture looks good regardless of whether we are sitting directly in front or at the dining table. Of course, it is not perfect equipment, as there simply aren't any in this price range. The IPS panel won't provide you with jet black, so evening horror movie sessions may appear slightly gray, and edge dimming in dark scenes can create visible light stripes. Despite these shortcomings, the QNED80A makes up for it with an overall good picture quality. The processor's performance deserves immense praise – both scaling regular TV to 4K and presenting details in HDR content are outstanding here. The picture is clean, sharp, and rich in detail, even if the screen itself doesn't break brightness records. Combined with the superb WebOS system, which operates quickly and stably, this is a very safe, solid choice for everyday family entertainment at a relatively low price.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
No
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.9/10

2.7/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 6 (1 x 6)

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,500:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,550:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

2,400:1

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,350:1

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

2,450:1

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,200:1

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,150:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Contrast and black detail
Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Contrast and black detail

The model PUS7000 we tested in the 55-inch size is equipped with a VA panel. This is significant for black quality, as in such budget constructions we do not find local dimming systems that could assist the screen in dark scenes. Therefore, all the work rests on the panel itself, which, thanks to its characteristics, offers a decent contrast of 6000:1. In practice, this translates to much better experiences during evening viewings compared to competing TVs with IPS panels. The black here is better separated from bright elements, making dark parts of the image not appear washed out, and details in shadows remain visible. However, it is worth noting that in completely dark conditions, the black may slightly take on shades of navy blue and will not be as perfectly "pitch black" as in more expensive models. To mitigate this effect and improve depth perception, it is advisable to consider watching the TV with soft, additional lighting in the room. Usually, this issue was somewhat resolved by the well-known Ambilight system from Philips TVs, which, through a glow on the wall, optically increases contrast. Unfortunately, in the PUS7000 model, the manufacturer decided to look for savings, so we do not find this backlighting system here, which is standard in higher series like the PUS8000.

If you come across a model equipped with an IPS panel, the situation changes drastically and we won't beat around the bush – the contrast is simply weak. This is a natural feature of this technology, which pales in comparison to VA panels. Black, especially during evening screenings in the dark, is rarely jet black – more often, it leans towards shades of dark gray or navy blue. However, the real problem with this variant is the way the local dimming system operates. Since we are dealing with edge-lit backlighting on a panel that naturally "lets" through more light, this system often does more harm than good. When a bright object appears on a dark background, the TV tries to illuminate it by activating the appropriate zone. The effect? Instead of pinpoint light, we see illuminated vertical bands stretching across the entire screen. Unfortunately, this looks worse than in the VA version. Due to the lower native contrast of the panel, these "light bands" (so-called blooming) are much more visible and stand out more from the background. In many cases, these jumps in brightness are so aggressive that instead of enjoying the show, we focus on the backlighting work.

HDR effect quality

3.3/10

4.8/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 78.3%, Bt.2020: 57.1%
DCI P3: 91.3%, Bt.2020: 66.5%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

197 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

209 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

230 nit

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

369 nit

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

325 nit

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

434 nit

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

342 nit

Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

318 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review Philips PUS7000 HDR effect quality
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review Philips PUS7000 HDR effect quality
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review Philips PUS7000 HDR effect quality
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

LG QNED80A6A (IPS)

HDR luminance

Philips PUS7000

HDR luminance

Unfortunately, the PUS7000 is not suitable for watching HDR content. This screen is simply too dark. A brightness level of 200 nits is not enough to correctly display such a format. Even if a HDR signal message appears on the screen, the image will resemble a regular SDR recording. Therefore, it's better to stick with the latter format to avoid issues in displaying bright scenes, which you can read about below. The situation is not improved by the fact that this is a classic LCD model without additional layers to enhance colors, such as QLED or PFS. As a result, colors in HDR may appear washed out. Ultimately, this gives a worse effect than in the standard SDR format, which is simply better suited to the capabilities of this panel.

When it comes to image dynamics and brightness, the QNED80A has its feet firmly on the ground. It is not a "light beast" – during our measurements, peak brightness oscillated around 350-400 nits. To put it plainly: these are values that will not allow HDR formats to fully spread their wings. So don’t expect the glare of the sun or car headlights in movies to blind you. However, this TV has a powerful ace up its sleeve that saves the overall view of the image – it is the colors. LG engineers have implemented an advanced filtration system here (technically likely based on a PFS phosphor, marketed as QNED/NanoCell), which does a fantastic job. Thanks to it, despite the average brightness, the screen can generate exceptionally saturated and pure colors. Our instruments showed coverage of the wide DCI-P3 cinema palette at the level of 93-94%. This result outclasses most standard LCD TVs. In practice, this means that when watching 4K HDR content, the image – while not particularly bright – is very plastic, vibrant, and pleases the eye with the depth of colors.

Factory color reproduction

5.3/10

4.4/10

Review Philips PUS7000 Factory color reproduction
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review Philips PUS7000 Factory color reproduction
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the television in movie mode, which theoretically should provide the best and most natural colors. And indeed, this mode is quite correct; however, after connecting the calibration equipment, its biggest flaw became apparent. The PUS7000 has significant deficiencies in displaying red. Poorly tuned white balance and too low saturation of this color cause the image to appear too cool. As a result, one might get the impression that the displayed content is simply lacking in vibrant colors. The situation is exacerbated by the fact that both SDR and HDR content are excessively brightened. This is confirmed by the gamma curve and EOTF graphs, which show that the television displays the image brighter than it should. This causes scenes to lose their depth and may appear somewhat washed out. Fortunately, the Philips menu offers many functions to improve these aspects, so we immediately proceeded to calibration to see what could be squeezed out of this screen.

Here, regardless of whether you encounter the VA or IPS version, the situation looks identical. LG engineers once again served us their vision of a "gaming look," which unfortunately has little to do with accuracy. After switching to console, the white balance automatically drifts into very cold areas. The image is dominated by the color blue, making it seem artificially sharpened, and the white is so aggressive that it is almost burned out. This creates an effect that we associate with bright retail modes – everything is supposed to shine and scream "I am digital." While some may like this, we must say it straight: this is not an accurate image. If you care about naturalness, we suggest checking the settings right away and changing the color temperature to a warmer one.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

7.4/10

Review Philips PUS7000 Color reproduction after calibration
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Color reproduction after calibration
Review Philips PUS7000 Color reproduction after calibration
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Color reproduction after calibration

After professional calibration, it is clear that the PUS7000 responds well to image adjustments. In this price range, this is not a given. The effects should be assessed in two scenarios, depending on what content we plan to watch. SDR performs the best. After our corrections, the image looks really good. Most color errors fell below level 3, which is the threshold at which distortions typically become visible to the naked eye in measurements. Movies, series, sports, and regular television present themselves naturally, without unpleasant deviations. If someone primarily watches classic channels or streaming in HD quality, the difference after calibration will be noticeable immediately. However, it must be made clear that the PUS7000 is still not a television suitable for sensible HDR, and calibration does not change much here. The reason lies in the hardware: colors remain too undersaturated. The television lacks solutions that expand the color gamut, such as PFS filters or a quantum dot layer, so the panel simply cannot show the intense colors required by HDR. This is most evident in reds, which still look pale. This limitation cannot be bypassed with menu settings, as it results from the design of the backlighting and the panel itself.

After professional calibration, the QNED80A in the IPS version has changed beyond recognition, especially in "regular" content (SDR). We managed to eliminate the greenish tint and calm down the overly bright gamma. In classic television or older games, color errors (DeltaE) fell below the threshold of perceptibility (value < 2). The image is now consistent, natural, and truly pleasing to the eye. The situation is somewhat more complicated in HDR mode. Although the colors are already in place, the television has trouble perfectly controlling the brightness (EOTF curve). Due to the limitations of edge lighting and the rather poor adjustment options provided by LG in this area, the television's software sometimes "does what it wants" just to mask the imperfections of black and contrast. However, this is not a cause for concern – despite these technical limitations, the image after calibration is a class better than what you saw out of the box.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

6/10

9.2/10

Review Philips PUS7000 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips PUS7000 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips PUS7000 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips PUS7000 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Smoothness of tonal transitions

In terms of color gradation in bright scenes, the PUS7000 model performs surprisingly well. It's hard to have any major complaints here. The color transitions are natural and smooth, so there are no disturbing bands or jumps between shades on a bright background. When watching cheerful scenes, nothing should distract your attention from the screen. However, the situation changes dramatically when darker shades of gray or simply very dark colors appear on the screen. Unfortunately, you can then see quite strong "stepping" of colors. Instead of smooth transitions, you get clear cuts between individual tones. In dark, atmospheric films, this can be quite annoying and distract from the viewing experience, as the tonal transitions are not as clean as in the bright parts of the image.

Another very strong point of this model is the way it handles tonal transitions. Often in cheaper LCD constructions, we see what's called banding – a situation where the television cannot smoothly display a gradient, creating visible "steps" between shades. In the case of the QNED80A, the engineers have done their homework. Whether we are watching a blue sky, fog, or dark scenes full of gray, the transitions between colors are incredibly smooth and soft. There are no artificial cuts or jagged color edges. As a result, the image is very cohesive and natural, which is not a standard in this price segment.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.5/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Review Philips PUS7000 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review Philips PUS7000 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

The PUS7000 handles digital image processing quite well. The distortion reduction feature deserves praise, as it effectively smooths out unwanted tonal transitions even at a low setting. However, it has a flaw: if the action is too aggressive, it can introduce undesirable artifacts on the screen. It’s a good idea to experiment with this setting to find the sweet spot between a smooth image and detail clarity.

The upscaling, which is the enhancement of lower quality materials to 4K, is adequate. The image after processing is very "soft," which is typical for almost all Philips televisions. The edges are plastic and smooth, making the image look cohesive. If someone finds it too soft, it can always be adjusted with the sharpness slider in the menu to achieve a more pronounced effect.

It often happens that cheap 4K TVs mercilessly expose the flaws of low-resolution materials. Here, it's different. The QNED80A is great equipment for watching content that isn't perfect. The processor does a great job of upscaling the image, making even older recordings look quite decent on a 4K screen – they are consistent and free of digital noise. An interesting feature is the gradation reduction available in the settings. It is quite effective in combating so-called banding (color banding) in low-bitrate materials. Of course, one should approach it with some caution. Due to the lower computing power of the chip (compared to the premium series), enabling this option can sometimes result in unwanted artifacts or blurriness. Despite this risk, we encourage experimentation, as in many cases this feature can save a poor-quality viewing experience.

Blur and motion smoothness

3.9/10

4.6/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
No
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

In this regard, we don't really have any good news. It might seem that the biggest downside is the lack of a 120 Hz panel, but in this price range, that's actually standard, and it's hard to expect more. However, the worst part is that the TV does not have any motion smoothing features. There are no supporting systems for either movies or sports. We have to accept that the image on the PUS7000 is processed "raw." This means that during dynamic scenes or fast camera movements, the motion may appear choppy or unclear. We have no way to enable any smoother that would soften this effect.

In terms of motion reproduction, the QNED80A unfortunately has a tough time. The television is based on a 60Hz refresh rate panel, which in 2025 in the QNED series is quite a disappointment. If you are looking for perfect sharpness in dynamic soccer matches, you might feel a bit unsatisfied. A solution in this situation is the TruMotion system. It allows for artificially adding frames, which smooths out the image in movies and series. In the menu, you will find the De-Judder slider – we recommend setting it to a value of 2, 3, or 4. This is the "golden mean" that improves fluidity without turning the film into a soap opera.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Although the PUS7000 is not marketed as a gaming TV, it does not perform as poorly in this category as one might expect. While there is no support for 120 Hz refresh rates, which is understandable at this price point, the manufacturer has included several important features that genuinely improve the comfort of playing on a console. The most significant of these are VRR and ALLM technologies. VRR is responsible for synchronizing the screen with the number of frames generated by the console. This prevents the image from "tearing" and keeps it consistent even during sudden frame drops in the game. In turn, ALLM is a solution that automatically switches the TV to the lowest latency mode right after detecting a signal from the console. All of these parameters are easily accessible thanks to the Game Bar feature. This is a special control panel for gamers that can be brought up on the screen at any time. It allows for a quick overview of current settings and connection status without interrupting gameplay, which is a very convenient solution.

In the gaming section, we won't sugarcoat it for you – the QNED80A is not e-sports equipment. The lack of support for 120Hz signal is a fact that must be accepted. However, LG engineers have done everything to squeeze the maximum potential out of this 60 Hz panel, providing gamers with a set of desired features. First and foremost, the television supports VRR (in the range of 48-60Hz) and ALLM. This means that the image is smooth, does not stutter, and the television automatically switches to low latency mode as soon as we pick up the controller. Accessing these options is incredibly simple thanks to the dedicated system overlay – Game Dashboard. It is also worth appreciating the support for the HGiG format. This is a nod to owners of modern consoles. Although the screen does not support gaming Dolby Vision, HGiG ensures that the television "understands" how to display games in HDR. This helps us avoid the issue of blown-out clouds, which is unfortunately a plague on cheaper LCD televisions.

Input lag

10/10

9.8/10

SDR

1080p60
12 ms
15 ms
1080p120
2160p60
12 ms
15 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
15 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

Another plus for gamers is the very low input lag at around 12 ms. In this price range, the result is impressive. The delay is small enough that the response to controller movements feels instantaneous, and in practice, it's hard to notice at all. Gaming remains comfortable even in fast, dynamic titles where every millisecond counts. In this regard, the PUS7000 can keep pace with much more expensive televisions.

What about responsiveness? Our measurements showed an input lag of about 15 ms. In the gaming world, where top monitors go down to 1 ms, this might seem like an average result, but in the category of living room TVs, it is a very good result. In practice, this means that when playing on a console, you will not feel any discomfort. There's no situation here where the character reacts with a noticeable delay after pressing a button on the controller. The TV responds to the controller without delay, allowing you to enjoy the gameplay without unnecessary irritation. For recreational gaming after work – the result is quite acceptable.

Compatibility with PC

5.8/10

5/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Average
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
12ms
15ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGB
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No
Review Philips PUS7000 Compatibility with PC
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Compatibility with PC

When it comes to connecting a computer, the gaming options are quite limited. The screen supports a maximum of 60 Hz and does not offer G-Sync technology, so it is not equipment for demanding PC gamers. However, the PUS7000 surprisingly performs well for text work. The readability of the fonts is at a very high level. The TV correctly handles chrominance sampling at 4:4:4. This means that every letter, regardless of its size or color, is displayed sharp and without any distortion at the edges. As a result, office work or browsing the internet on this screen is simply comfortable and does not strain the eyes like some cheap panels that have trouble with clean font rendering.

In terms of cooperation with a PC, we have another surprise in store. Theoretically, it is IPS matrices that, due to their pixel structure, should dominate in displaying static office content. Meanwhile, the QNED80A breaks the mold once again. During testing, we noticed strange behavior when displaying text. While classic, bold fonts are readable and look correct, the trouble begins with small, thin letters. They tend to "split" along the contours and cast a strange shadow. This causes fine text to become less clear, and prolonged reading can be tiring for the eyes. So, if you are looking for a TV that will mainly serve to display Excel tables or Word documents, this particular variant may disappoint you a bit.

Viewing angles

3.1/10

6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
70%
69%

The viewing angles in this model are poor, which results directly from the use of a VA-type panel. Although this panel provides decent contrast, as I mentioned earlier, it has one major drawback: it requires sitting directly in front of the screen. Just slightly shifting to the side is enough for the colors to start losing saturation, and the picture becomes noticeably worse.

Do you remember how we complained about the weaker contrast? Now it's time for a comeback. It is in terms of viewing angles that the IPS matrix shows its superiority and reason for existence. If you have a spacious living room and family members watch television from different spots – for example, from an armchair in the corner or over the dining table – this variant will be a home run. Unlike VA panels, here the image retains its properties even at a large angle. Colors remain vibrant and do not change hues when viewed from the side. This makes the QNED80A in this version a great choice for watching games with friends or cartoons with kids, where not everyone has the luxury of sitting perfectly in front of the screen.

Daytime performance

3.5/10

4.7/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good
Review Philips PUS7000 Daytime performance
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Daytime performance
Review Philips PUS7000 Daytime performance
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

LG QNED80A6A (IPS): 310 cd/m2

Philips PUS7000: 202 cd/m2

In a sunny room, the PUS7000 performs poorly. This is all because the panel is simply dim. A brightness level of 200 nits is a very low score that does not allow for comfortable viewing in bright daylight. On the positive side, the satin screen coating does quite well in reducing reflections. Thanks to it, the panel does not display reflections as prominently, but this is not enough to save the situation. The brightness of this model is too low to cut through strong sunlight, so in very bright rooms, the image will simply be unclear.

QNED80A is not a "light monster," so in full, direct sunlight, the image may appear a bit washed out. It is not equipment dedicated to combating sharp sunlight hitting directly on the screen. However, it has an ace up its sleeve that significantly improves user comfort: the panel coating. Instead of a cheap, glossy finish, LG has used a satin texture here. It works very effectively, "softening" reflections from the surroundings. So we don't see our perfect reflection in the screen like in a mirror, which can be incredibly irritating in darker scenes. So it might be insufficient for extremely bright rooms, but in standard, moderate home conditions, the QNED80A will perform perfectly.

Panel details

Backlight Type
White LED
Mini-LED PFS LED
Software version during testing
TPN256E_V056.002.236.141
33.21.62
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Philips PUS7000 TV Panel details
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV Panel details
Review Philips PUS7000 TV Panel details
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV Panel details

Philips PUS7000

LG QNED80A6A (IPS)

TV features

5/10

6.8/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV features
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV features
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV features
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV features
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV features
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV features
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV features
Review LG QNED80A6A (IPS) TV features

Titan OS System

Titan OS is still a fairly new operating system, and unfortunately, this is evident in daily use. Overall, it operates sluggishly, sometimes even clumsily. The response to commands from the remote is slow, which is further complicated by the fact that the device uses infrared connectivity instead of Bluetooth / RF. This means that we have to aim the remote quite precisely at the television for the system to respond at all. During testing, the screen mirroring feature with computers equipped with Windows failed to work again. Fortunately, streaming from Apple devices using AirPlay went smoothly. Another drawback of Titan OS is the very modest app library. The selection is much smaller than in systems like webOS or Tizen, not to mention Google TV, where the choice of programs is almost unlimited.

Classic Features

On the other hand, the PUS7000 might be a good choice for people who mainly watch traditional television. Here we find a properly functioning teletext and a clear EPG interface, which is the electronic program guide. The remote included in the package is backlit, which greatly facilitates operation after dark, and it has standard numeric buttons for quick channel selection. Interestingly, there is a classic headphone jack input. This is a rarely seen addition in new televisions, allowing for the connection of older home theater systems or wired headphones without the need for additional adapters.

WebOS Platform and Support

One of the biggest advantages of the QNED80A model is its "brain," meaning the operating system. LG has implemented a full-fledged WebOS for the year 2025, which in terms of smoothness and usability is on par with more expensive models. Applications launch smoothly, and navigating the menu is a pure pleasure. All this is thanks to the unique remote control with a pointer function (cursor), which underwent a visual overhaul this year. The manufacturer opted for minimalism—the new "Magic" is significantly smaller and more ergonomic. It fits perfectly in hand, but this change also has a downside. The physical number pad has disappeared from the casing. For the younger generations, who are accustomed to streaming, this is not an issue, but older family members who are used to entering channel numbers from memory will have to change their habits.

Everyday Use and Add-ons

In terms of functions that we would call "classic," the QNED80A sticks to a proven standard. It is not a multimedia powerhouse that will surprise you with exotic features, but it performs flawlessly in everyday television craftsmanship. The operation of classic television, including Teletext, is correct and problem-free. Wireless communication also deserves praise—the Bluetooth module works reliably, allowing for quick connections to a game console controller or wireless speakers. This is a TV that simply "works"—steadily, predictably, and without unnecessary complications.

Apps

6.7/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8.2/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
No
24 Mpix
No
No
28 Mpix
No
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player works quite well and handles most popular video formats without major issues. The TV easily reads subtitles from files and manages various audio formats, so those who keep movies on a disk or USB drive should not feel limited. The only complaint pertains to the photo browser - not everything worked correctly, and some files, especially at certain resolutions, would not open at all.

Many of us still enjoy watching movies or photos from our own USB drives. Here, the QNED80A performs quite decently, supporting a wide range of video and audio codecs. Most movie libraries will start "right off the bat." However, it is important to remember the specifics of the WebOS system. Since it is a closed environment, we are stuck with what the manufacturer has prepared for us – there is no option to install alternative players (e.g., the popular VLC) if we encounter a read error. What kind of errors might we encounter? First and foremost, the lack of support for HEIC files. So, if you take pictures with your iPhone and want to display them on a large screen straight from the flash drive – the TV won't see them. It's worth changing the photo save format on your phone to JPG right away. We also noticed that the player has difficulties processing very large graphic files. Photos with resolutions around 20-28 Mpix might not load or could cause errors. Aside from these exceptions – the playback is trouble-free.

Sound

5.8/10

6/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The sound is already at a typical budget level. It is sufficient for news and public affairs programs, but when it comes to movies and music, it quickly lacks depth and bass. At this price range, it's hard to expect something more, so if we care about better experiences, it’s worth considering a soundbar or connecting external audio, even through the headphone output.

When it comes to sound, the QNED80A fits into the market standard for the mid-range. Here we have a classic 2.0 setup with a power of 20 watts. We won't hide it – you can't fool physics. The sound lacks low tones (bass) and that specific depth that builds the atmosphere in action movies or while listening to music. However, the TV has one significant advantage that users of traditional television, such as series and news programs, will appreciate. It's the reproduction of speech. Dialogues are surprisingly clear and natural. The sound is not "bass-heavy" or artificially boosted, which prevents ear fatigue and allows understanding every word of the narrator without the need to increase the volume.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

No acoustic data